Collective Security and the League of Nations

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Collective Security and the League of Nations WWlf Cors"s f.^,ope a Collective security and the League of Natlons """b.,J.F^,'u li Efq [. ]sEG) ,o rhc L:rut! A$.nbrr tr .Pr' d; '. ' '. The Covenant of the League of Nalions Why did collective securit fail in the 1930s? i I r.turc b a wid &Dh&d l))' iilio! fore rhc usxr mrimr hon€ rlr q pEom9l"ruggl.db@F$thsan h4rJh ro i mrior rcrcDn or4r ii ihc ercdsdd t [ \ i F! Gd ed Ftide $iid b ish-Nhs partie (he Bitrh bbou. ofiirud drbd n M:r rer. h taPe i drrstr'bd.rio!r dbmibryadbR .IIE CAUSES OFWOBLDWAF IN EL.]FOPE] TtsE FALURE OF @LIfCTNTE SEC'I]RI sdEunodfohid'6.hpidollheD TheD+!smh.jshtn.dth.f.o.d olqPi6'l!n'oditin{|d&EP|iaft olE Y dirfori b ruis. d'. srch& ro!5 ii.Ehst fdred ,o lds rh.i snrsj GaF!1./|gPonofeiofij.gFtb ud d€Pldird d rhe) ltnptd ro Prett rh.n .oph ii rhe o,bwAsJnnois oer). Fnr. dd ldv eok brsr b b.afur.d,*lhqw<!ndt*hddyd. ^hhoud 'lylcd'plohz+l's'!nia'oda..n D.pBbD* rishto4 i3 gric,, dbh.tbi The Abyssinian Cti6is (1935) id Lg.n kild elzlo4rot e tn@n iii*^r,,p*' ar+,"+.a'. ;;;.,;,;,.."," 2_ o I d fi<Ld qi6 Po$[L I]Ni$! !$(5Dn i E \ I Lc f q,l1ro o+ U'tar^( pe4i The Washington Conference \1921 22) and J3Fi ii pdnuh @nihEd ro bu tll up .itfonrt.'ftu|bnna8!b'j'oilo rid rx,0@6rFGft.!!dhrGonoo.5rr.orrnqK,sriailnd,4{) rh. asrord surd Dnrlc Bn6 d6hn r irci rhr 1s: altnnc vnh JiPai, rsi otr pror.d rh. 4hri of dr jsnqrs b e$tr.Aglbdt$,[email protected] isblldrh. The London Nava Conference (1930) . mijor Po*6 vse nir rQn b I nir rhor 5lgaDo!iho4i'h4didercb@nibu The London Naval Treaty (1936) h rerj-r6, rhe Drtor eoq.( nd r o 'o The Geneva Disarmament Conference (1932-34) br'btIt4u.ofNnfi'EKaid€Pa 4 Ii3rr b @rn. Br dn dn. HiLri N 'n. dd tqdity of rnrusi bd rhn spnrdor <hs.d dthFm.hwutily'Jfcsndlrosqud ln odobs rs!, Hids (rN Gneror dGqn:ir, danid.ary k r& cqhln Why did the League lailto achieve disarmament? P.lhlPsmNtdi!.ppoinl.ddhnshi|utlo olrylhou8htsFoogmdis{n:me alrddyl@'atbNb@4(gftcos @rr<dEs<uiry'GnPdidofo!DIk. ird rh! id.a ofonedE *ontI od Dom dd mlfthuctbdm.dono.d s THE CAUSLS OI WOBLD WAB II IN EUFOPE: HITLER,S WAB Hitle/s foreign policy aims: 1919-j3 tsi'r' hd foudr i $bdd w{ r, ud ir! beicnPonn|}'bliid.diil3!l{h.|c h. h.'d ofcdm:ils surcid.r ri * Hldd h6 ntid, mn h d{td.d 6 go ih 'ki, doDhrion of E{rn Eu6p. (Pobnd od Linutu b@n! c.man r@ibn6). n6c Bis, how€i wd. ton wro c.miq E @ Bddai'dMnorybPbhDd'hrdd N:, rodsi pdiq ** 3ha.d br r[t hino ldb'MbnDd.nlh.D.!t.h.Aib.it+d.i (DAPi Csnai sblr.r',Bnr, r.d rcn. I (NsL{Pi N{joilr s..hrrr G(nan wqksr hny) h rero D), rer, Hitd ^lb.idprk rq ob'{rtK sd 6 d! ubn d d' Grn:N,:! rid ro rh. rturr ofv.srnk, r d. {rub! oos f6n c.ds e.i.rr.'reB T}e I ad bq bn djEdvd r[{ cd* a6ren. "dld I I hrd (r!Mr i! ih. Glnf hrd fdr @uP). t t (.,p1ft. bo.L hs, embh{bn of tI tu Gmm n.hl puiiq n'l rh. 1bslot ; 6' it'd.qqat. ha..p.e d kt 8.r a$w6 4 Mt6 alJE.toa E.tubre . wc n6l ha,qhdhsthturoh b,iut tu kt e.nn etotu * ha nd,arb,nat I Fnntutr*t4Ndr er9ttert thd rhc Pbs d doE n Mai karl @dd b! vr{.d r Hr'rs! e/t,rr,, d rr4. br n4. prol rh i6i lbF wdd b. : E 5 .r Gh s'!^,e,4 i hL b@k. ri&.d, M.r e,r^ vrE *.!id6a ofw phm4 ry ruf Npr. * djdha oaHrder! ct :i i arioo for eid dominrioritp T:ytd, hv jud @dru', c M.,B &ztr 6ri4 hd. nrddrt - I ftlk df s*hin ainrjng ry a dht4dhgboolczE6&dl'h@n .o&ip Fnqobj<'iK ri d.loorr Hi& di.rdber&ier:rrho!$h.rsbrh4 jnrh. re3Ga6dnrussr.Ndr& d sirenni, vhG rtriqi di4dhioi E aiddsf'hiF,rdrar'@limii.d'd<@.d hk plildFl6 of abiiiry Br kdoli6 of r.r.M!', sFc b b..rd r6n rh. ussf, rtu ordwof \tNin6 Bi6' dE p!@bte ro $n obir'iE Hitler's rise to Dower rutr31e'udlh.€rn.sdrftL43u *pldonu&nh.db.'h'h.L4ut|':bililyloGin€Gssda6.ddlh. sin''giadfn@bqdac'owr'€th( ! i' E tu hF( ofih. srober !@rcd( d'is ed prr&,,rart domric in w.ini.c.o.ny (s 6pr! 4). rh. fa @oPb,rb b pmi rid..4 rh. Nd Artl! 'u.c @ 7 6!od.Hjdq-6dt'o.ontrcpo€|qdl lDuary 1err. ts. wr aov lblc b pdsu. u. enft isNE 6c4n Pdiq obj.d(6, r h.lc4lhiddiioi,Hi'|fihdbeob@u8hlb Pons ri'h ihe 6$rna of db{ 4h-! o N&, qinc '* buljr.irii sd rhe ri3ht d hiD'.t $G ndd rh{ rh. \'L @dd so' I Hitler and the short-term causes of World War ll ihrcuofi.reror Isodd$cn {i.rerdth6.obid\E@uldLi,obhitdPa{od Rev s ng the Treaty of Versailes ,'siorii3ioras.dhknrbELtt6tr, obF.isFDed dn{oamr btiiri g .I cqooi, INninq' ni r,t fs { s. o/r,fina r.ir. @ 'hDq&mqlxo.t'ansibr&rwrh6hM,,o rof Hi'r,. J!&r obiloiB \$!,o uitrr r sm. k4rh E M,ii &npl sq$sr q q $iI bIr Pu6Lt rcf qPtbiri!'Tk boon kr h'roPrr oxadi€i i rib eo 6 qsi 'tunlbdr€dhr@ir de@t!&firyatrts€r'i itua* i 6e tr5: German rem itarzatron ofthe Rh neand t0 rnilinidh. re vr porribrr ridrt il\ dd rili'*ih, Nadih.rss, {r Fu 'ed !.d or ro his e{ objedir Hller's involvemeni in the Spanish Civi War ish.rbs sqgnnoi h powr s Doturc bi 3Ls d ou, Grnot' !€$ {d 'o Rome Berin A\ s and lhe Ant' Comintern Pacl Mssolin irr sus.d,h€ d{ or! Rdhe coohrm hd srh ,iPan r NorEer Ler6. h rerT dr joied ib! per. rh. Nai Fo( ,bn, b! s4 ,iPan b aPPrr Fr$urc h The Hossbach N,4emofandum h! russEiis 6n r.$bj.d 6r dnan r! rdnls o/rr! !@d rrr/ rhr Rsel 3'Jl{'0lsiHo'EqA]!'4o[j E LL .I na9. tn tu? Mqapdt aJ vid!tr. - wht ruoPeru rd? coi4 b lrd, Jin6 sha ilqin nn xk, dd ltu kae, at h. {nt Mrydtdtrt*btht4v,a pttid cttt.rttttt t.trc,*in othn h4 84. at {i'.' rk h{-he, ntn\& olvhn h, vt Bh t did d@ y tundd. Erk' rht otHrb^ rn4q5 b,x ih. andhd.t al rl ,o,: cqqd w| hk.h ,r.] |h.|t| J.? nqlh,, rret hd dt b{r rykQd t\ nor Fbhh6$drqrkMdoF .r*dddiw E 468 Hrn.rh{a \|4.1h' The takeover of Czechos ovakia tijiolbtdcdrtiis'bIh(slLld63h|oItbl l] N NIFOF- ts TLEF 5 WAN I {, k* ,J- D s.pr.nb., ejkin, Eiic od hl' d<ldld b 44e b HiL!\'utriinum: ind sr Hitler and the immediate causes of World War ll PUs€d ih@udou ih. Drr rJr ! !i ! hNei'h.mlllhdghHnk!hdsi3ltda[ It1 The invasion of Poland ,hrt vs [email protected] c(Do. rh. inpns Y. Po 0d !T rcl@\ ra ! 6 b lql' Dd.psd.d'h@'n<d Porish riiibd to 'h. F20,6€ kd aror l$vir arw) hd nrd.d q Is icbryt6kqbihe6L.ft$scedD fo{6 b Pcprtr I do rdr rh. ford s@E irlqeBd.tuid4,n d* rM.ft . tu6 * rh! drroPljoi. dd q ruf F3 ,h< 6 tohid. 6<oir tiord ,1. kd ^i3'o ADDeasement as a cause of World War ll o I rd'b'Brndh6e'9Ishn@p'iiNlolnk drrudond &Pu6 br s,trt4 srisu< bdgh'abN'tg.[.nlEdorbl*$ho o/af $aid noir woi dila3Rd '/'r! .haF'b[nih.1odb3b,6!dtoa tnFftEt dr,h kaP, ssssrhs r w: E had s0ns.d Hidd b b. iiftnr"s! a lo Nhlynslh<brkrFld-t.bd|oq|h t1 Reviewing the causes of war a E hde ee,4.h of rhe oajor Eudp! Brltain , sisncd A4ro c{oan Ndi &G 'h. USSR htGtvo{b6t€!'dbIIzg@nelvlhGdi{Y Italy tudrryrdtiuP@nb E t0.
Recommended publications
  • Crager on Burkman, 'Japan and the League of Nations: Empire and World Order, 1914-1938'
    H-US-Japan Crager on Burkman, 'Japan and the League of Nations: Empire and World Order, 1914-1938' Review published on Wednesday, March 11, 2009 Thomas W. Burkman. Japan and the League of Nations: Empire and World Order, 1914-1938. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 2008. xv + 289 pp. $58.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-8248-2982-7. Reviewed by Kelly E. Crager (Texas Tech University)Published on H-US-Japan (March, 2009) Commissioned by Yone Sugita Japanese Interwar Diplomacy In Japan and the League of Nations, Thomas W. Burkman recounts the history of Japan's foreign affairs from the close of World War I through the beginning of the Second Sino-Japanese War. Traditional understanding of Japan's role in the world during this era has been grossly simplified, according to the author, and a new and more balanced treatment of this topic was necessary to help bring about a fuller understanding of the developments in East Asia and the Pacific region prior to the Second World War. Although generally considered to have been an aggressive world power that largely eschewed international involvement to pursue its national interests, the empire, as Burkman insists, was very much committed to the promotion of ideals espoused by Woodrow Wilson and embodied in the League of Nations. Even though the Japanese readily embraced internationalist ideas, and participated fully, Japanese internationalism was influenced by peculiarly Japanese ideas concerning power and place. The author believes that when Wilsonian internationalism began to wane and when the economic pressures of the global depression began to set in, Japanese policymakers sought to protect national interests in the region rather than holding fast to internationalist policies that would make the empire vulnerable to foreign powers.
    [Show full text]
  • Peacekeeping Interventions in Africa
    d Secur n ity a e S c e a r i e e s P FES Gavin Cawthra Peacekeeping Interventions in Africa “War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength.” About The Author Professor Gavin Cawthra holds the Chair in Defense and Security Management at the Graduate School of Public and Development Management (P&DM) at the University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. He is former Director of the Graduate School of Public and Development Management, and was previously coordinator of the Military Research Group, Director of the Committee on South African War Resistance, and Research Officer at the International Defense and Aid Fund (UK). Professor Gavin Cawthra holds PhD from King’s College, University of London and BA Honours from the University of Natal. He has published numerous books as well as journal articles in the area of security studies. His publications have been translated into several languages. Mr. Cawthra has lectured in more than 20 countries all over Africa and does regularly consultancies for governments, NGOs and international organisations. Part of this briefing is drawn from the findings of a research project carried out under the leadership of the author, made possible by a Social Science Research Council African Peacekeeping Network (APN) research grant, with funds provided by Carnegie Corporation of New York. Cover Art How have we become mere voters and passive participants instead of shaping our own destiny? This is the question that Mozambican artist, Nelsa Guambe, asks in her current exhibition, “Status quo”. The paintings reflect on the current situation of the country, on collective debt, political conflict, devaluation of the local currency Metical and roaring inflation.
    [Show full text]
  • This Essay Focuses on the Concept of Collective Security with a View Of
    POSSIBLE TRANSFORMATION OF COLLECTIVE SECURITY ARRANGEMENTS IN THE POST-SEPTEMBER 11 ERA Collective security is by nature a result of attempts to preserve the security of each and every state, which has come together against a common enemy/adversary. This concept will be analyzed in relation to the role of identity-building in the formation of collective security arrangements. Coercion has been one of the indispensable stimulants in state building. It is evident that anything, which is gained with coercion, is exposed to threat and thus to implicit vulnerability, as it is not achieved with the free will cooperation of others. Corollary to this logic, it can be said that as states are the product of coercion, they are exposed to threats against their security. Naturally, the essential minimum activities of a state have also been related to the use of coercion. Of these essential activities, war making and protection are directly related to coercion. One can therefore readily understand that security has always been a matter of critical importance for states since their existence is coercion-based. It is also evident that in this course of coercion-based international affairs, states resorted also to collective security efforts in various forms ranging from collations to even pacts and alliances that would in turn help their own security. HASAN ULUSOY1 1 Hasan Ulusoy, born in 1966, is a Turkish diplomat. He has served at the Turkish missions in France/ the Council of Europe, Nigeria and Iran, and now works as first secretary at the Turkish Embassy in Switzerland. He has a MSc.
    [Show full text]
  • Collective Security and the United Nations
    Collective Security and the United Nations: The Work of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change KEVIN OZGERCIN Collective Security and the United Nations FES Briefing Paper September 2004 Page 2 national security in 2003, evidenced not least by “...the object of the exercise [Panel] is to find a Security Council paralysis around Iraq. The attack credible and convincing collective answer to the on the UN mission in Baghdad on 19 August challenges of our time. We must show that the 2003 equally traumatized the world organization. United Nations is capable of fulfilling that purpo- In the months preceding the formation of the se, not just for the most privileged Member Sta- HLP, there was a growing tendency of one tes but also those that are concerned with the group of states, led by the US, to pronounce its threats posed by poverty, hunger and disease. right of unilateral, pre-emptive military strike, We must understand that a threat to some is a irrespective of established international norms threat to all, and needs to be addressed accord- and considerable opposition from the Security ingly.” — UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, 18 Council and other authoritative agencies. Mean- February 2004 while, another group of states highlighted the 1 Mandate of the High-Level Panel on dangers such unilateralism and indiscriminate Threats, Challenges, and Change use of force may pose to international order and the collective security of humans as well as When United Nations Secretary-General Kofi states. The UN and the international
    [Show full text]
  • From Hegemony to Ambivalence. Nato's Transformation and European Stability
    FROM HEGEMONY TO AMBIVALENCE. NATO'S TRANSFORMATION AND EUROPEAN STABILITY by Marco Cesa Università di Bologna Facoltà di Scienze Politiche and The Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies Bologna Center Fellowships Programme 1997-1999 Final Report submitted to NATO, Office of Information and Press, June 30 1999. NOT TO BE QUOTED WITHOUT PERMISSION 2 CONTENTS: Introduction p. 3 1. The Limits of Alliance Theory p. 4 2. Alliances: A Typology p. 7 3. NATO after the End of the Cold War p. 14 4. The Leader Asserts Itself... p. 18 4.1 Who’s Afraid of the European Pillar? p. 20 4.2 Bigger Is Better (or Isn’t It?) p. 24 4.3 Out of Area or Out of Business p. 28 5. ... and the Followers Reluctantly Comply p. 30 Tables p. 34 Bibiliography p. 35 Abstract p. 40 3 Introduction Although the scholarly literature on alliances is extremely rich and variegated1, it is no exaggeration to argue that its conceptual and theoretical content leaves something to be desired2. In the work of political scientists and analysts, alliances are invariably seen as aggregations of power, reflecting either the need to face some threat or the opportunity of achieving some gain. But diplomatic historians know better. Indeed, they often show that the functions performed by alliances are not simply confined to a third, external, party: in fact, most alliances involve functions of reciprocal control and management among the allies: in many alliances, the partners try and restrain or influence each other, and what is often at issue is not merely the pursuit of the collective interests of the alliance but the coexistence of various national interests.
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization News (Bi-Monthly); United Nations Task Trative Apparatus of Its Own
    UNESCO – United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization News (bi-monthly); United Nations Task trative apparatus of its own. (The Com- Force on Environment and Human Settle- mittee worked as advisory organ from ments: Report to the Secretary-General, 1922 until 1946 when its role was taken 15 June 1998, New York 1998. over by UNESCO.) Internet: Homepage of UNEP: www. In 1925, France, responding to a re- unep.org; UNEP Industry and Environment quest by the Assembly of the → League Unit: www.unepie.org/; International Insti- of Nations, after the latter had been un- tute for Sustainable Development, Earth Ne- gotiations Bulletin (reports on the sessions able to secure funding to maintain a sig- of the Governing Council of UNEP and on nificant office in Geneva, created the In- other important UNEP meetings): www.iisd. ternational Institute for Intellectual Co- ca; further: www.ecologic-events.de/ieg-con operation, a legally independent institu- ference/en/index.htm; www.reformtheun.org/ tion with a secretariat of its own, fi- index.php/united_nations/c495?theme=alt 2. nanced by the French government. The International Committee of Intellectual Co-operation continued to exist as the UNESCO – United Nations Institute’s Board of Trustees. Educational, Scientific and Cultural From the beginning, conflicts sur- Organization rounded the creation of UNESCO: Should it be a governmental or a non- I. Introduction governmental organization? (→ NGOs) UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Should the Organization be concerned Scientific and Cultural Organization) solely with education and culture was founded on the initiative of the (“UNECO”) or should it encompass fur- Conference of Allied Ministers of Edu- ther areas, such as science and commu- cation, set up during World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • The League of Nations
    CFMUNESCO Cividale del Friuli Model United Nations UNESCO HISTORICAL COMMITTEE BOOKLET 2020 1920 – The League of Nations INDEX Part 1 - Work in the Historical Committee…………………………………………………..…page 3 Part 2 - Historical Background…………………………………………………………………page 6 Part 2.1 Historical Background - Aftermath of the world……………………………………...page 6 Part 2.2 Historical Background - Paris Peace Conference………………………………….…..page 9 Part 2.3 Historical Background - The League of Nations………………………………….….page 15 Part 2.4 Historical Background - First session of the League of Nations……………………..page 20 Part 3 - Chronology……………………………………………………………………………page 22 Part 4 - Nations and characters represented……………………………………………….…..page 23 Part 5 - Historical documents……………………………………………………….…………page 24 Sources……………………………………………………………………………….………..page 32 2 Historical Committee Booklet Part 1- Work in the Historical Committee A Historical Committee is a specialised committee that will be part of CFMUNESCO 2020. Its rules of procedure are slightly different from those of other MUN committees and so this Booklet is necessary to future delegates to understand them well. 1. How will the Historical committee work? A Historical Committee is a committee focused on historical events, which occurred in past times. For this reason, throughout the conference, delegates will have to pretend they are taking a step back into the past. The discussion will cover the period after the end of the Great War, from the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 until the approval of the Locarno Pact on the 1st December 1925. Delegates will discuss about real crises that endangered the stability of our world in the above mentioned period. The crises discussed occurred in different years and, during the debate, they will be discussed following their chronological order.
    [Show full text]
  • Minorities in Lithuania
    [Communicated to the Members of the Council.] C. 149.1 9 2 5 . 1. Geneva, March gth, 1925. LEAGUE OF NATIONS MINORITIES IN LITHUANIA Situation of the Polish Minority in Lithuania (See Council Document C. 31. 1925. I.) Note by the Secretary-General. In a letter dated March 6th, 1925, the Lithuanian Government communicated to the Secre tary-General some further observations regarding the situation of the Polish minority in Lithuania The Secretary-General has the honour to communicate herewith to the Members of the Council for their information the above-mentioned letter and observations. LETTER ADDRESSED TO THE SECRETARY-GENERAL BY THE LITHUANIAN DELEGATE TO THE LEAGUE OF NATIONS. Geneva, March 6th, 1925. I have the honour to forward to you the enclosed memorandum concerning the situation of the Polish minority in Lithuania, with the request that you will communicate it to the Members of the Council. Annexes I to IV will follow this document as soon as possible. (Signed) V. S idzikauskas , Lithuanian Delegate to the League oj Nations. Lithuanian Minister at Berlin. MEMORANDUM CONCERNING THE SITUATION OF THE POLISH MINORITY IN LITHUANIA submitted to the Council of the League oj Nations by the Lithuanian Government. The so-called Committee of Exiled Poles in Lithuania, whose headquarters are at Vilna, has addressed several petitions to the Council of the League of Nations accusing Lithuania of not observing the provisions of the Minorities Declaration of May 12th, 1922, and of persecuting the Polish minority in Lithuania. The Lithuanian Government, in its note of May 28th, 1924, addressed to M.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Collective Security and the United States Security
    Chicago Journal of International Law Volume 10 Number 1 Article 5 6-1-2009 United Nations Collective Security and the United States Security Guarantee in an Age of Rising Multipolarity: The Security Council as the Talking Shop of the Nations Kenneth Anderson Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil Recommended Citation Anderson, Kenneth (2009) "United Nations Collective Security and the United States Security Guarantee in an Age of Rising Multipolarity: The Security Council as the Talking Shop of the Nations," Chicago Journal of International Law: Vol. 10: No. 1, Article 5. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol10/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. United Nations Collective Security and the United States Security Guarantee in an Age of Rising Multipolarity: The Security Council as the Talking Shop of the Nations Kenneth Anderson* I. INTRODUCTION: POSTULATING THE RISE OF A MULTIPOLAR WORLD Two interrelated theses are these days much in vogue. One is the thesis of US decline and, by corollary, the rise of new Great Powers and multipolarity. Though this thesis is in vogue today, it has been a favorite of writers, politicians, and statesmen over generations-almost a parlor game for intellectuals. It is a parlor game that tends, however, to turn historians into futurists. Proceeding from the unimpeachable, but also uninformative, observation that no empire in the course of history has lasted forever, thence to the claim that the American empire is teetering-these analyses have a predictive track record as poor as they are undeniably popular.
    [Show full text]
  • From Nuremberg to the Hague
    From Nuremberg to The Hague: Teaching from the Past - Challenges for the Future Background: Making War More “Civilized” Efforts to mitigate the impact of military conflicts extend well back into the 19th century. One turning point came with Henry Dunant’s experiences in Italy in 1859, when more than 30,000 dead and wounded were left untended or unburied after the battle of Solferino. Dunant did what he could to help the wounded and care for the dead on the battlefield, but his options were very limited. He then went on to advocate founding a neutral entity to care for the wounded – a desire that met with widespread support. The new organization, founded in 1863, would name itself the “International Committee of the Red Cross” (ICRC) in 1876. By August 1864, twelve countries had already adopted the first Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field (the “First Geneva Convention”). But the Red Cross and Geneva Convention focused “only” on such casualties as wounded soldiers and prisoners of war, not the way in which war itself was waged (ius in bello) or the right to wage war (ius ad bellum). Ten years later, at the Brussels Conference of August 1874, a group of countries entered into negotiations on the “Laws and Customs of War.” While the Brussels declaration failed to take effect for lack of adequate ratification, 25 years later the treaties based on it – the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 – brought a breakthrough. The Hague Conventions on Land Warfare prohibited certain means and methods of waging war, and can be viewed as an attempt to civilize the very process of waging war itself.
    [Show full text]
  • NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946
    INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL (NUREMBERG) Judgment of 1 October 1946 Page numbers in braces refer to IMT, judgment of 1 October 1946, in The Trial of German Major War Criminals. Proceedings of the International Military Tribunal sitting at Nuremberg, Germany , Part 22 (22nd August ,1946 to 1st October, 1946) 1 {iii} THE INTERNATIONAL MILITARY TRIBUNAL IN SESSOIN AT NUREMBERG, GERMANY Before: THE RT. HON. SIR GEOFFREY LAWRENCE (member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) President THE HON. SIR WILLIAM NORMAN BIRKETT (alternate member for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland) MR. FRANCIS BIDDLE (member for the United States of America) JUDGE JOHN J. PARKER (alternate member for the United States of America) M. LE PROFESSEUR DONNEDIEU DE VABRES (member for the French Republic) M. LE CONSEILER FLACO (alternate member for the French Republic) MAJOR-GENERAL I. T. NIKITCHENKO (member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) LT.-COLONEL A. F. VOLCHKOV (alternate member for the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics) {iv} THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FRENCH REPUBLIC, THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND, AND THE UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Against: Hermann Wilhelm Göring, Rudolf Hess, Joachim von Ribbentrop, Robert Ley, Wilhelm Keitel, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, Alfred Rosenberg, Hans Frank, Wilhelm Frick, Julius Streicher, Walter Funk, Hjalmar Schacht, Gustav Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach, Karl Dönitz, Erich Raeder, Baldur von Schirach, Fritz Sauckel, Alfred Jodl, Martin
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf Crisis and Collective Security Under the United Nations Charter
    Pace International Law Review Volume 3 Issue 1 Article 9 September 1991 The Gulf Crisis and Collective Security under the United Nations Charter Stephen M. De Luca Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr Recommended Citation Stephen M. De Luca, The Gulf Crisis and Collective Security under the United Nations Charter, 3 Pace Y.B. Int'l L. 267 (1991) Available at: https://digitalcommons.pace.edu/pilr/vol3/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at DigitalCommons@Pace. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pace International Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Pace. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE GULF CRISIS AND COLLECTIVE SECURITY UNDER THE UNITED NATIONS CHARTER INTRODUCTION The international response to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait stirred hope in many people around the world that, for the first time since it was created forty-five years ago, the United Na- tions can fulfill its role as the keeper of international peace and security.1 For the first time since 1950, during the Korean Con- flict, the Security Council adopted resolutions2 condemning an act of aggression, calling for universal action to stop the aggres- sion, and imposing sanctions to force the aggressor out of the invaded territory.3 The most remarkable aspect of the adoption of these resolutions is not that the Soviet Union did not boycott the Council, as it did in the Korean Conflict,4 but that no per- manent member of the Security Council5 used its veto power' to Greenberger & Shribman, Coming of Age: U.N., Long Stymied By Cold War, Be- gins to Fulfill Its Promise, Wall St.
    [Show full text]