Maeresera Sadiki 2012.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maeresera Sadiki 2012.Pdf University of KwaZulu-Natal Military Interventions in African Conflicts: The Southern African Development Community Coalition of the Willing’s Military Intervention in the Democratic Republic of Congo, 1998-2002 By Sadiki Maeresera Supervisor: Prof Ufo Okeke Uzodike Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Postgraduate programme in Political Science, School of Social Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietemaritzburg, South Africa 2012 DECLARATION I declare that this thesis is my own unaided work. All citations, references and borrowed ideas have been duly acknowledged. It is being submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities, Development and Social Sciences, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. ----------------------------------- -------------------------------------------- Sadiki Maeresera Professor Ufo Okeke Uzodike ---------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Date Date i DEDICATION I dedicate this dissertation to my parents, who through the power and blessings of Almighty God have always and will forever remain the source of inspiration. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to first and foremost acknowledge my appreciation to my supervisor, Professor Ufo Okeke-Uzodike, for his unwavering kindness in giving me advice, constructive criticism, and firm guidance from the first day I registered with the University of KwaZulu-Natal’s School of Politics as a doctoral candidate up to the completion of this gruelling academic work. My appreciation goes to members of staff and students at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg and more specifically Professor Deane Peter Baker (now with the United States Naval Graduate School), Dr Noleen Loubser, Dr Bernard Matolino and Ayo Whetho, my fellow doctoral candidate in the School of Politics for their scholarly inspirations. I am greatly indebted to the following institutions and individuals who assisted me in conducting interviews during my fieldwork research: staff at the United Nations Observer Mission in the Congo (MONUC), the office of the African Union (AU) special representative in the DRC, and the respective government ministries and departments and civil society groups in the following countries where fieldwork research was conducted: Angola, Botswana, DRC, Namibia, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe as well as South Africa. Special mention goes to the staff at the following embassies in Kinshasa: Angola, Botswana, Namibia, Mozambique, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. I wish to thank the following Professors for their assistance in facilitating interviews during fieldwork research: Ernest Wamba dia Wamba (former president of the DRC rebel group, RCD and now a member of the DRC government), Gavin Cawthra and Antoni Van iii Nieuwkerk of the Centre for Defence and Security Studies at the University of the Witwatersrand, Assindie Mungala of the UNESCO Chair at the University of Kinshasa, Andre Du Pissani of the Department of Political Science at the University of Namibia and Bizeck Phiri of the Department of Political Science at the University of Zambia. Special thanks to Colonel Manuel Barros of the Institute for Strategic Studies at the University of Luanda, and Lt. General Louis Fisher of the Centre for Strategic Studies at the University of Botswana. Last but not least, I appreciate all the continuous constructive criticism and comments I got from the following professors: Theo Neethling of the Department of Political Science at the University of the Free State; Louis Du Plessis of the Centre for Military Studies, University of Stellenbosch, Mark Hough of the Institute for Strategic Studies, University of Pretoria and Lloyd Sichone of the University of South Africa, and Professor Martin Rupiya of the African Public Policy and Research Institute. The long time scholarly encouragement and motivation I got from the academic staff at the University of Zimbabwe’s Department of Political Science, particularly Professors Hasu Patel, John Makumbe, Dr Joseph Kurebwa, Dr Charity Manyeruke, Dr Max John Chinyanganya, Mr Eldred Masunungure and Mr Simon Badza, is much appreciated. I would like to express my appreciation for the moral support I got from my beloved and caring family (Tinotenda, Laura-Nyaradzo, Oppah and Joyce). I acknowledge the research grant awarded to me by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) through the United Nations University for Peace, Africa Programme. The views expressed in this thesis are the author’s own. iv ABSTRACT This study focuses on the premise that national interests of governments are the primary motivating factors that inform decisions on military interventions. Military strategy remains a principal tool in the attainment, pursuance and safeguarding of these interests. Military intervention is the last resort to a series of options that begin with and continue to inform the dynamic: diplomacy, policing, reliance on alliance action and finally, deterrent or pro-active military action. Military interventions in the 20 th century have been undertaken at the multilateral, regional and sub-regional levels in given conflicts by a range of actors. Scholarly questions have been asked about the rationale behind the respective governments’ decisions to undertake these interventions. In the case of this study, which focuses on the SADC coalition of willing nations’ military intervention in the Congo conflict, questions have centred on the following: What was the rationale and motive that led governments of the three countries to undertake the decisions for military intervention in the Congo? Was the intervention an altruistic act by the intervening governments seeking to stop aggression of an ally or was it driven by the personal quests by leaders of these intervening countries to secure their share of the DRC mineral wealth? Or, was it merely a case of the three governments intervening as a coalition in pursuit of their varied interests? What was the strategy that this coalition adopted in pursuit of the member countries interests? It is this attempt to explain and determine the rationale and principal factors that informed the three countries’ decision to intervene in the conflict and the military strategy adopted to safeguard these interests that serve as the focal basis for this study. In trying to answer its key questions, this study uses historical and qualitative approaches in collecting and analysing data not only from both primary and secondary sources but also v interviews with participants (some off the record as still serving). Thus, the findings of the research would be analysed critically within the framework of the core objectives of the study, which seek not only to identify and establish how the interests of the governments that intervened in the DRC conflict were the primary motivating factor that informed their decisions on military interventions, but also to ascertain the extent to which the SADC coalition’s military strategy became a principal tool in the attainment and safeguarding of these varying interests as well as how that strategy was utilised as a mechanism for the translation and development of these varying interests into common ones among the intervening countries. Lastly, the study seeks to offer policy suggestions on the execution of future military interventions in African conflicts, particularly at the SADC sub-regional level. Whilst literature on military interventions seems to be informed by realpolitik, with the notions by Barry Buzan (and others) that strong states take decisions to intervene when their geostrategic and economic interests are served, states can also militarily intervene for humanitarian purposes. Using the realist paradigm as a theoretical tool of analysis, the study noted that military intervention can best be understood in terms of the power and interests of particular nation states acting individually or collectively as a coalition using the brand of a sub-regional, regional or even international organisation with or without the mandate of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). An analysis is made on the scholarly legal debates surrounding the decision to intervene by the SADC coalition. The study generally established that the claimed interests that motivated the decisions by the respective governments were generally based on the political, economic and military/security dimensions. A critical evaluation of these respective interests of the interveners show that their interests shifted in regards to the levels of importance (that is primary and secondary vi level) at the initial stage of the intervention and during the intervention period. The coalition’s military strategy became a tool for attaining, securing and safeguarding of these respective interests. As part of the strategy, the SADC coalition’s Mutual Defence Pact acted as a political and legal guide in the promotion of complimentary and common interests of the interveners. Despite formulating such a military strategy, the unexpected longevity of the intervention impacted on the intervening countries’ logistical capacity to sustain the war effort. An initiative by the DRC government to enter into bilateral business ventures with the respective SADC countries and its awarding of mining concessions to the same was meant to be part, arguably, of sustaining the military intervention. However, this war time economic initiative has raised questions among scholars and policy practitioners on whether or not the
Recommended publications
  • Patronage and Military Entrenchment in the National Economy
    Patronage and Military entrenchment in the national economy THE PRESIDENT’S MEN: Zimbabwe’s Service Chiefs are suspected to have played a key role during the election.-zimbabweinpictures.com This week, we continue with publishing and controlling ownership of the means as platinum and gold mining. This section edited excerpts from a report published hrough an elaborate patronage of production. The military, through po- examines the extent to which ZANU-PF’s by the Crisis in Zimbabwe Coalition titled system established to reward OLWLFDOSDWURQDJHKDVEHFRPHDVLJQLÀFDQW political patronage has entrenched the The Military Factor in Zimbabwe’s Politi- SDUWLVDQ VHQLRU PLOLWDU\ RIÀ- part of the domestic bourgeoisie class and military in national economic affairs and cal and Electoral Affairs. Below is Chapter cials and keep them loyal to many top commanders have teamed up the likely impact on electoral processes. 5 of the report which looks at how service TZANU-PF and to President Mugabe, the with politicians and businessmen to form Retired and serving senior military chiefs are being handsomely rewarded for military has increasingly played central political and economic interest groups RIÀFHUVKDYHLQWKHUHFHQWSDVWEHHQDS their role in maintaining the status quo. and critical role in directing production venturing into lucrative businesses such Continued on Page 3 The Bottom Line is Economic Empowerment “I believe that if we solve the Now the issue is that Zimbabwe- see is for the South African gov- opment Chamber we tell people, are campaigning for elections. economic problems then other ans come to South Africa look- ernment to give the Zimbabwean ´<RXFDQEHWKHHPSOR\HUUDWKHU In Zimbabwe people are dying.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mortal Remains: Succession and the Zanu Pf Body Politic
    THE MORTAL REMAINS: SUCCESSION AND THE ZANU PF BODY POLITIC Report produced for the Zimbabwe Human Rights NGO Forum by the Research and Advocacy Unit [RAU] 14th July, 2014 1 CONTENTS Page No. Foreword 3 Succession and the Constitution 5 The New Constitution 5 The genealogy of the provisions 6 The presently effective law 7 Problems with the provisions 8 The ZANU PF Party Constitution 10 The Structure of ZANU PF 10 Elected Bodies 10 Administrative and Coordinating Bodies 13 Consultative For a 16 ZANU PF Succession Process in Practice 23 The Fault Lines 23 The Military Factor 24 Early Manoeuvring 25 The Tsholotsho Saga 26 The Dissolution of the DCCs 29 The Power of the Politburo 29 The Powers of the President 30 The Congress of 2009 32 The Provincial Executive Committee Elections of 2013 34 Conclusions 45 Annexures Annexure A: Provincial Co-ordinating Committee 47 Annexure B : History of the ZANU PF Presidium 51 2 Foreword* The somewhat provocative title of this report conceals an extremely serious issue with Zimbabwean politics. The theme of succession, both of the State Presidency and the leadership of ZANU PF, increasingly bedevils all matters relating to the political stability of Zimbabwe and any form of transition to democracy. The constitutional issues related to the death (or infirmity) of the President have been dealt with in several reports by the Research and Advocacy Unit (RAU). If ZANU PF is to select the nominee to replace Robert Mugabe, as the state constitution presently requires, several problems need to be considered. The ZANU PF nominee ought to be selected in terms of the ZANU PF constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Business-Security Complex and the Transition in Zimbabwe
    The Security-military Business Complex and the Transition in Zimbabwe Zimbabwe Institute Discussion Paper: June 2008 Abstract The military has over the last few years expanded and consolidated its position in both the politics and the economy of Zimbabwe. The Zimbabwe army now virtually controls the major institutions of the state and formal policy making structures and processes of the country. Through their role in the Joint Operations Command- a group of the Army, Police, Prisons and the Central Intelligence Organisation heads which meets regularly to coordinate military and security affairs, serving and retired military and other security officials have come to direct all key national and governance issues rather than the cabinet. On the economic front, the military has increasingly played an important role in both directing production and ownership of the means of production. The military has become a significant part of the domestic bourgeoisie class and many top commanders have teamed up with politicians and businessmen to form political and economic interest groups venturing into lucrative business ventures, such as platinum and gold mining. The military is now deeply engrained in the in political and economical affairs of the country that whatever transitional deal has to be undertaken has to take into consideration the political and economic interests of this important constituency. The increased role of the army in politics since the late 1990s strongly suggests that the military leadership would be an important power broker whose opinion will have to be sought on any political deal to be concluded. Equally, all other parties would need to get the army to underwrite any agreement if it were to be effective and lasting.
    [Show full text]
  • The Discourse of Tribalism in Botswana's 2019 General Elections
    The Discourse of Tribalism in Botswana’s 2019 General Elections Christian John Makgala ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5984-5153 Andy Chebanne ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5393-1771 Boga Thura Manatsha ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5573-7796 Leonard L. Sesa ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6406-5378 Abstract Botswana’s much touted peaceful Presidential succession experienced uncertainty after the transition on 1 April 2019 as a result of former President Ian Khama’s public fallout with his ‘handpicked’ successor, President Mokgweetsi Masisi. Khama spearheaded a robust campaign to dislodge Masisi and the long-time ruling Botswana Democratic Party (BDP) from power. He actively assisted in the formation of a new political party, the Botswana Patriotic Front (BPF). Khama also mobilised the country’s most populous Central District, the Bangwato tribal territory, of which he is kgosi (paramount chief), for the hotly contested 2019 general elections. Two perspectives emerged on Khama’s approach, which was labelled loosely as ‘tribalism’. One school of thought was that the Westernised and bi-racial Khama was not socialised sufficiently into Tswana culture and tribal life to be a tribalist. Therefore, he was said to be using cunningly a colonial-style strategy of divide- and-rule to achieve his agenda. The second school of thought opined that Khama was a ‘shameless tribalist’ hell-bent on stoking ‘tribalism’ among the ‘Bangwato’ in order to bring Masisi’s government to its knees. This article, Alternation Special Edition 36 (2020) 210 - 249 210 Print ISSN 1023-1757; Electronic ISSN: 2519-5476; DOI https://doi.org/10.29086/2519-5476/2020/sp36a10 The Discourse of Tribalism in Botswana’s 2019 General Elections however, observes that Khama’s approach was not entirely new in Botswana’s politics, but only bigger in scale, and instigated by a paramount chief and former President.
    [Show full text]
  • After Mugabe Mnangagwa’S Choice
    COMMENT AFTER MUGABE MNANGAGWA’S CHOICE We have removed a tyrant but not yet a tyranny, argues David Coltart or the last two years I have warned that what they did. Others have criticised those of us Zimbabwe was facing a perfect storm—the who complained about the illegality, saying that unique convergence of several factors that we were purists and out of touch with the need to could tear the country apart.* The eye of remove the biggest evil, namely Mugabe. However, Fthat storm hit Zimbabwe in mid-November and it is not my main purpose here to argue why the although it tore down the house of Robert Mugabe, coup was wrong. Let me rather quote the words it left remarkably little other damage. What I didn’t of the great philosopher John Locke who wrote anticipate was the level of unity within the military. in 1690 that ‘wherever law ends, tyranny begins’. I feared that the divisions within the ruling ZANU Tyranny, not Robert Mugabe, was our greatest evil, PF party were reflected in the military and that and the breach of our laws and Constitution has the removal of Mugabe would result in a firefight merely entrenched and perpetuated tyranny. within the armed forces. Although there was serious If there is any doubt about this one needs only to tension between the police and the army, the army consider the composition of the new Cabinet. Since and airforce stood together causing remarkably 2008 Robert Mugabe was in essence a fig leaf—the little loss of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Briefing
    Policy Briefing Africa Briefing N°51 Pretoria/Brussels, 21 May 2008 Negotiating Zimbabwe’s Transition I. OVERVIEW tensify, with more Zimbabweans fleeing across bor- ders, while inflation, unemployment and the resulting massive suffering increase. The 29 March 2008 elections have dramatically changed Zimbabwe’s political landscape. For the first There has been a chorus of condemnation from West- time since independence in 1980, Robert Mugabe ran ern leaders and international and African civil society second in the presidential voting, and the opposition – over the withholding of the results and the rising vio- the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) – won lence. The UN Security Council discussed Zimbabwe, control of parliament. The MDC went to the polls while the African Union (AU) and Southern African deeply divided, but Morgan Tsvangirai and his party Development Community (SADC) called for release regained their authority by winning despite an uneven of the results and criticised the violence. However, playing field. Instead of allowing democracy to run its South Africa’s President Thabo Mbeki has continued course, Mugabe has fought back by withholding the to shield Mugabe, not backing away from his 12 April presidential results for five weeks and launching a statement that there was no crisis in the country. countrywide crackdown. Zimbabwe is in constitutional Other African leaders, led by SADC Chairman Levy limbo: it has no elected president or legally constituted Mwanawasa and AU Chairman Jikaya Kikwete, seem cabinet, parliament has not been convened, and prepared to take a more robust line. Since the impact ZANU-PF and the MDC are challenging half the par- of outspoken, Western-driven diplomacy is likely to be liamentary results in court.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Cartel Power Dynamics in Zimbabwe 1 © Report on Cartel Power Dynamics in Zimbabwe NOTE from the EDITOR
    Report on Cartel Power Dynamics in Zimbabwe January 2021 ©Report on Cartel Power Dynamics in Zimbabwe 1 © Report on Cartel Power Dynamics in Zimbabwe NOTE FROM THE EDITOR Maverick Citizen is publishing this report on cartel dynamics in Zimbabwe. Sadly, it is not safe to do so in Zimbabwe at a time when freedom of expression and the press has been brutally suppressed. Journalists and activists are being regularly arrested, imprisoned and sometimes tortured and murdered. The findings outlined in this report emanate from local research that has been thoroughly and independently fact checked by Maverick Citizen and trusted independent professionals. We believe the report’s analysis and recommendations can inform anti-corruption agencies, governments and human rights activists worldwide on this urgent subject of concern. Although all the facts and allegations in this report have been published in various forms of media before, Maverick Citizen provided prior notice and the opportunity for those referred to in the report to respond to its findings before publication. Maverick Citizen is a section of the Daily Maverick, and is an online news publication, which focuses on human rights, social justice and civil society activism. Read our reports daily at: www.maverickcitizen.co.za Write to us at: [email protected] 2 © Report on Cartel Power Dynamics in Zimbabwe CONTENTS Acronyms ........................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Africa Report
    PROJECT ON BUSINESS AND POLITICS IN THE MUSLIM WORLD AFRICA REPORT Third Quarterly Report on Africa July to September 2008 Volume: 1 Reports for the month of July 2008 Principal Investigator: Prof. Dr. Ijaz Shafi Gilani Contributors Abbas S Lamptey Snr Research Associate Reports on Sub-Saharan AFrica Abdirisak Ismail Research Assistant Reports on East Africa INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY ISLAMABAD BUSINESS AND POLITICS IN THE MUSLIM WORLD AFRICA REPORT Third Quarterly Report on Asia July to September 2008 Volume: 1 Reports for the month of July 2008 Department of Politics and International Relations International Islamic University Islamabad 2 BUSINESS AND POLITICS IN THE MUSLIM WORLD AFRICA REPORT Third Quarterly Report on Africa 2008 Table of contents Reports for the month of July Week-1 July 08, 2008 05 Week-2 July 15, 2008 95 Week-3 July 22, 2008 241 Week-4 July 29, 2008 366 Country profiles Sources 3 4 BUSINESS AND POLITICS IN THE MUSLIM WORLD Weekly Presentation: July 8, 2008 Sub-Saharan Africa Abbas S Lamptey Period: June 29 to July 5, 2008 THE HEADLINES 1. CHINA -AFRICA RELATIONS WEST AFRICA • Nigeria: Phase3 Telecom Partners Chinese Firm for Additional Rollout: Daily Trust (Abuja): 30 June 2008. SOUTHERN AFRICA • South Africa: Reality Check: Business Day (Johannesburg): EDITORIAL: 4 July 2008. • Angola: Govt And China Sign Financial Accord: Angola Press Agency (Luanda): 4 July 2008. • Angola: Chinese Communist Party Hails Political Stability, Economic Growth: Angola Press Agency (Luanda): 3 July 2008. • Angola: President Eduardo Dos Santos Analyses Cooperation With China: Angola Press Agency (Luanda): 3 July 2008. • Namibia: Major Chinese Building Firms 'Not AA Compliant’: The Namibian (Windhoek): 1 July 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • A Country Held Captive by Its Past: the Case of Zimbabwe
    Ekonomia — Wroclaw Economic Review 24/1 (2018) Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis No 3832 DOI: 10.19195/2084-4093.24.1.9 Olga Kraśniewska University of Wroclaw [email protected] A country held captive by its past: The case of Zimbabwe Date of submission: 20th of March 2018; date of acceptance: 15th of May 2018 JEL Classification: A10, E31, F54, N37, O55 Keywords: Zimbabwe, colonialism, land reform, hyperinflation, Robert Mugabe, crisis Abstract A country held captive by its past: The case of Zimbabwe The article provides an overview of the history of Zimbabwe in the context of economical, structural and social factors. It tries to answer a question, what were the main reasons that affected Zimbabwe’s development after gaining independence in 1980. It describes pre-colonial and colonial times as well as president Mugabe’s era, that ended with a military coup in November 2017. It portrays issues such as the after-effect of colonialism, land reform, political regime, internal struggles and conflicts between the ruling party ZANU-PF and opposition parties, hyperinflation crisis, as well as economic indicators like GDP, public and external debt, level of education and health care. In the context of upcoming elections in 2018, the article deliberates whether meaningful changes in the country’s situation are possible in the nearest future and what it will take to achieve them. To understand the present, one has to know the past Undoubtedly, the history of a given country is inextricably linked to the people that govern it. Zimbabwe is quite unusual in this respect. From the moment it gained independence from the white rule until November 2017, Zimbabwe was practically governed by only one major political party — ZANU PF, led by Robert Gabriel Mugabe.
    [Show full text]
  • Broken Ranks
    Wounded eagles Fresh blood from old wounds Rogue army for a fragile state The howitzer and the handshake Broken ranks Issue 30 | February/March 2015 | www.gga.org Available now: Africa Survey 2014 Africa in Figures Africa Survey 2014 T Businesses trading internationally, latest year % Share of… - total exporting total total total 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% total sales inputs Latest directly or sales sales inputs and/ inputs and trade Country exported of Chad 2009 year indirectly that are exported or supplies of foreign regulations “The Africa Survey is a one- indirectly b (at least 1% directly of foreign b origin Benin 2009 a b origin of sales) origin constraint Congo (Rep.) 2009 Algeria 2007 5.2% 98.5% 0.8% 0.7% 71.8% 53.3% 46.8% 36.1% Burkina Faso 2009 Angola 2010 5.8% 98.6% 0.4% 1.0% 60.7% 74.7% 25.3% 35.8% Tanzania 2013 Benin 2009 12.8% 91.9% 2.7% 5.4% 55.8% 59.3% 40.7% 56.2% Algeria 2007 Botswana 2010 9.6% 96.6% 1.8% 1.6% 86.3% 38.4% 61.6% 15.8% stop-shop for every African Burkina Faso 2009 8.7% 97.2% 1.1% 1.6% 76.5% 48.0% 52.0% 42.6% Angola 2010 Burundi 2006 2.1% 99.2% 0.6% 0.3% 78.5% 57.2% 42.8% 20.9% Gabon 2009 Cameroon 2009 9.3% 96.5% 1.8% 1.7% 63.2% 64.7% 35.3% 26.3% Central African Republic 2011 Cape Verde 2009 4.0% 97.0% 0.6% 2.4% 59.5% 53.1% 46.9% 27.2% Niger 2009 Central African Republic 2011 15.1% 94.7% 3.0% 2.4% 85.1% 38.7% 61.3% 31.9% Chad 2009 11.8% 94.0% 3.0% 3.0% 67.6% 53.4% 46.6% 57.4% Togo 2009 statistic you need but don’t Comoros … ………… ……… … Cape Verde 2009 Congo (DRC) 2013 9.0% 96.7% 1.7% 1.5%
    [Show full text]
  • The Weaponisation of the Coronavirus Crisis in Zimbabwe: Legal and Extra-Legal Instruments
    iBusiness, 2021, 13, 48-66 https://www.scirp.org/journal/ib ISSN Online: 2150-4083 ISSN Print: 2150-4075 The Weaponisation of the Coronavirus Crisis in Zimbabwe: Legal and Extra-Legal Instruments Gorden Moyo1, Kucaca Ivumile Phulu2 1Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Lupane State University, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe 2Faculty of Public Law, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa How to cite this paper: Moyo, G., & Phu- Abstract lu, K. I. (2021). The Weaponisation of the Coronavirus Crisis in Zimbabwe: Legal and This article sets out to examine the legal and extra-legal instruments deployed Extra-Legal Instruments. iBusiness, 13, by the ruling executive-military alliance in the fight against the scourge of the 48-66. COVID-19 pandemic in Zimbabwe. The ruling executive-military alliance led https://doi.org/10.4236/ib.2021.131004 by President Emmerson Mnangagwa has responded to the eruption of the Received: January 4, 2021 coronavirus by adopting a highly securitised approach backed by a battery of Accepted: March 22, 2021 legal and extra-legal instruments. It is therefore the argument of this article Published: March 25, 2021 that the Mnangagwa administration has weaponised COVID-19 in order to achieve some objectives beyond the public health concerns. In particular, the Copyright © 2021 by author(s) and government has sought to use the lockdown measures to clamp down on po- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative litical opposition, silence critics, contain the restive population, and entrench Commons Attribution International its power and control over some key accountability institutions including the License (CC BY 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • 293/04 : Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights and the Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa / Zimbabwe Summary of Fa
    293/04 : Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights and the Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa / Zimbabwe Summary of Facts 1. The communication is submitted by the Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights and the Institute for Human Rights and Development in Africa (Complainants) and deals with the Zimbabwean Government’s (Respondent) failure to expedite administration of justice, the functioning of the judiciary and alleged violation of the right to participate in government. 2. The Complainants allege that in the 2000 General Elections that took place in Zimbabwe the results of 40 constituencies were contested and the court was petitioned to invalidate the results. It is alleged that Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), the main opposition party file[d] petitions to invalidate results in 38 constituencies, the ZANU (PF), the ruling party filed one petition and the Zimbabwe Union of Democrats (ZUD) filed one petition. 3. The Complainants also allege that in an attempt to prevent the filing of petitions the President of the Republic of Zimbabwe passed a regulation giving him a wide variety of power in order to alter electoral laws as he sees fit. Further reasons for this action were to eliminate the jurisdiction of the courts from entertaining election petitions. According to the Complainants, the Electoral Act (Modification) No. 3 Notice of 2000 Statutory Instrument 318/2000 (Annexure 1) passed by the Respondent had the effect of legalising the outcome of the elections and oust the jurisdiction of the courts from hearing the petitions. 4. The MDC challenged the Regulation in the Supreme Court, and the Court held in its favour stating that “the notice effectively deprived them of that rights…The right of unimpeded access to courts is of cardinal importance for the adjudication of justiciable disputes”.
    [Show full text]