DOCSLIB.ORG

Club De Playa Km 17 +500

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Club De Playa Km 17 +500 CLUB DE PLAYA KM17+500 Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental-Modalidad Partícula CLUB DE PLAYA KM 17 +500 Promovente: RODRIGO MADRID PÉREZ MANIFESTACIÓN DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL Modalidad Particular 0 RODRIGO MADRID PÉREZ CLUB DE PLAYA KM17+500 Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental-Modalidad Partícula CONTENIDO CAPITULO I .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1. DATOS GENERALES DEL PROYECTO, DEL PROMOVENTE Y DEL RESPONSABLE DEL ESTUDIO DE IMPACTO AMBIENTAL. ................................................................................................... 2 1.1. Proyecto ................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2. Ubicación del proyecto ............................................................................................................. 2 1.3. Vida útil del proyecto ................................................................................................................ 4 1.4. Presentación de la documentación legal ................................................................................. 4 1.5. Promovente .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.5.1. Razón social ..................................................................................................................... 4 1.5.2. Registro federal de contribuyentes ................................................................................... 4 1.5.3. Nombre y cargo del representante legal .......................................................................... 4 1.5.4. Dirección del Promovente para recibir u oír notificaciones .............................................. 4 1.6. Datos generales del responsable del estudio de impacto ambiental ....................................... 5 1.6.1. Nombre o razón social...................................................................................................... 5 1.6.2. Registro federal de contribuyentes ................................................................................... 5 1.6.3. Nombre del responsable técnico de la elaboración del estudio ....................................... 5 1.6.4. Dirección del responsable técnico del estudio ................................................................. 5 CAPITULO II ............................................................................................................................................. 6 2. DESCRIPCIÓN DEL PROYECTO .................................................................................................. 7 2.1. Información general del proyecto ............................................................................................. 7 2.1.1. Antecedentes del proyecto ................................................................................................. 10 2.2. Naturaleza del proyecto.................................................................................................. 10 2.2.1. Selección del sitio ........................................................................................................... 12 2.2.2. Ubicación física del proyecto y planos de localización .................................................. 13 2.2.3. Inversión requerida ......................................................................................................... 15 2.2.4. Dimensiones del proyecto .............................................................................................. 15 2.2.5. Uso actual del suelo y/o cuerpos de agua en el sitio del proyecto y en sus colindancias. 17 i RODRIGO MADRID PÉREZ CLUB DE PLAYA KM17+500 Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental-Modalidad Particular 2.2.6. Urbanización del área y descripción de servicios requeridos ........................................ 19 2.3. Características particulares del proyecto ............................................................................... 20 2.3.1. Descripción de las obras y actividades .......................................................................... 20 2.4. Personal, equipos, y materiales ............................................................................................. 21 2.4.1. Personal ......................................................................................................................... 21 2.4.2. Insumos .......................................................................................................................... 22 2.4.3. Maquinaria y equipo ....................................................................................................... 22 2.4.4. Usos secundarios ........................................................................................................... 23 2.4.5. Análisis de estabilidad de las estructuras. ..................................................................... 23 2.4.6. Acciones adicionales ...................................................................................................... 23 2.4.7. Programa general de trabajo .......................................................................................... 24 2.4.8. Preparación del sitio ....................................................................................................... 24 2.4.9. Descripción de obras y actividades provisionales del proyecto ..................................... 25 2.4.10. Etapa de construcción ................................................................................................ 26 2.4.11. Etapa de operación y mantenimiento ......................................................................... 27 2.4.12. Descripción de obras asociadas al proyecto .............................................................. 27 2.4.13. Etapa de abandono del sitio ....................................................................................... 27 2.4.14. Utilización de explosivos ............................................................................................ 27 2.5. Generación, manejo y disposición de residuos sólidos, líquidos y emisiones a la atmósfera. 28 2.5.1. Etapa de construcción .................................................................................................... 28 2.5.2. Etapa de operación ........................................................................................................ 30 2.5.3. Infraestructura para el manejo y la disposición adecuada de los residuos. ................... 30 CAPITULO III .......................................................................................................................................... 32 3. VINCULACIÓN CON LOS ORDENAMIENTOS JURÍDICOS APLICABLES EN MATERIA AMBIENTAL Y EN SU CASO, CON LA REGULARIZACIÓN DE USO DE SUELO. ............................ 33 3.1. Vinculación con Programas de Ordenamiento Ecológico del Territorio, Áreas Naturales Protegidas, sitios Ramsar y zonificaciones prioritarias para la conservación ................................... 33 3.1.1. Programa de Ordenamiento Ecológico General de Territorio (POEGT). ....................... 33 3.1.2. Áreas Naturales Protegidas ........................................................................................... 98 ii Rodrigo Madrid Pérez CLUB DE PLAYA KM17+500 Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental-Modalidad Particular 3.1.3. Sitios Ramsar ............................................................................................................... 100 3.1.4. Regionalización del territorio en Regiones Terrestres Prioritarias (RTP), Regiones Hidrológicas Prioritarias (RHP), Regiones Marinas Prioritarias (RMP) y Áreas de Importancia para la Conservación de las Aves (AICAS) ......................................................................................... 102 3.1.5. Cumplimiento de leyes, reglamentos o normas de los tres niveles de gobierno. ........ 111 3.1.6. Normas Oficiales Mexicanas ........................................................................................ 116 3.2. Análisis integral de la viabilidad jurídica del proyecto. ......................................................... 161 3.3. Conclusiones ........................................................................................................................ 166 CAPÍTULO IV ....................................................................................................................................... 168 4. DESCRIPCIÓN DEL SISTEMA AMBIENTAL REGIONAL Y SEÑALAMIENTO DE TENDENCIAS DEL DESARROLLO Y DETERIORO DE LA REGIÓN ........................................................................ 169 4.1. Delimitación del Área de Estudio Preliminar ........................................................................ 169 4.1.1. Ubicación geográfica .................................................................................................... 169 4.1.2. Criterios para la definición del Sistema Ambiental ....................................................... 172 4.1.3. Delimitación del Sistema Ambiental ............................................................................. 180 4.2. Áreas de Importancia para la Conservación de las Aves (AICA). ....................................... 182 4.3. La Convención sobre los Humedales de Importancia Internacional: Convención de Ramsar. 184 4.4. Medio físico .........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CAT Vertebradosgt CDC CECON USAC 2019
    Catálogo de Autoridades Taxonómicas de vertebrados de Guatemala CDC-CECON-USAC 2019 Centro de Datos para la Conservación (CDC) Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas (Cecon) Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala Este documento fue elaborado por el Centro de Datos para la Conservación (CDC) del Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas (Cecon) de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia de la Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala. Guatemala, 2019 Textos y edición: Manolo J. García. Zoólogo CDC Primera edición, 2019 Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas (Cecon) de la Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia de la Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala ISBN: 978-9929-570-19-1 Cita sugerida: Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas [Cecon]. (2019). Catálogo de autoridades taxonómicas de vertebrados de Guatemala (Documento técnico). Guatemala: Centro de Datos para la Conservación [CDC], Centro de Estudios Conservacionistas [Cecon], Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala [Usac]. Índice 1. Presentación ............................................................................................ 4 2. Directrices generales para uso del CAT .............................................. 5 2.1 El grupo objetivo ..................................................................... 5 2.2 Categorías taxonómicas ......................................................... 5 2.3 Nombre de autoridades .......................................................... 5 2.4 Estatus taxonómico
    [Show full text]
  • Xenosaurus Tzacualtipantecus. the Zacualtipán Knob-Scaled Lizard Is Endemic to the Sierra Madre Oriental of Eastern Mexico
    Xenosaurus tzacualtipantecus. The Zacualtipán knob-scaled lizard is endemic to the Sierra Madre Oriental of eastern Mexico. This medium-large lizard (female holotype measures 188 mm in total length) is known only from the vicinity of the type locality in eastern Hidalgo, at an elevation of 1,900 m in pine-oak forest, and a nearby locality at 2,000 m in northern Veracruz (Woolrich- Piña and Smith 2012). Xenosaurus tzacualtipantecus is thought to belong to the northern clade of the genus, which also contains X. newmanorum and X. platyceps (Bhullar 2011). As with its congeners, X. tzacualtipantecus is an inhabitant of crevices in limestone rocks. This species consumes beetles and lepidopteran larvae and gives birth to living young. The habitat of this lizard in the vicinity of the type locality is being deforested, and people in nearby towns have created an open garbage dump in this area. We determined its EVS as 17, in the middle of the high vulnerability category (see text for explanation), and its status by the IUCN and SEMAR- NAT presently are undetermined. This newly described endemic species is one of nine known species in the monogeneric family Xenosauridae, which is endemic to northern Mesoamerica (Mexico from Tamaulipas to Chiapas and into the montane portions of Alta Verapaz, Guatemala). All but one of these nine species is endemic to Mexico. Photo by Christian Berriozabal-Islas. amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 01 June 2013 | Volume 7 | Number 1 | e61 Copyright: © 2013 Wilson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Com- mons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License, which permits unrestricted use for non-com- Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 7(1): 1–47.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Climate Change Measured at Relevant Spatial Scales: New Hope for Tropical Lizards
    Global Change Biology (2013) 19, 3093–3102, doi: 10.1111/gcb.12253 The impact of climate change measured at relevant spatial scales: new hope for tropical lizards MICHAEL L. LOGAN*, RYAN K. HUYNH† ,RACHELA.PRECIOUS‡ and RYAN G. CALSBEEK* *Department of Biology, Dartmouth College, 78 College St., Hanover, NH 03755, USA, †Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, 106 Guyot Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA, ‡Department of Natural Resource Conservation, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, 160 Holdsworth Way, Amherst, MA 01003, USA Abstract Much attention has been given to recent predictions that widespread extinctions of tropical ectotherms, and tropical forest lizards in particular, will result from anthropogenic climate change. Most of these predictions, however, are based on environmental temperature data measured at a maximum resolution of 1 km2, whereas individuals of most species experience thermal variation on a much finer scale. To address this disconnect, we combined thermal perfor- mance curves for five populations of Anolis lizard from the Bay Islands of Honduras with high-resolution tempera- ture distributions generated from physical models. Previous research has suggested that open-habitat species are likely to invade forest habitat and drive forest species to extinction. We test this hypothesis, and compare the vulnera- bilities of closely related, but allopatric, forest species. Our data suggest that the open-habitat populations we studied will not invade forest habitat and may actually benefit from predicted warming for many decades. Conversely, one of the forest species we studied should experience reduced activity time as a result of warming, while two others are unlikely to experience a significant decline in performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Xenosaurus Tzacualtipantecus. the Zacualtipán Knob-Scaled Lizard Is Endemic to the Sierra Madre Oriental of Eastern Mexico
    Xenosaurus tzacualtipantecus. The Zacualtipán knob-scaled lizard is endemic to the Sierra Madre Oriental of eastern Mexico. This medium-large lizard (female holotype measures 188 mm in total length) is known only from the vicinity of the type locality in eastern Hidalgo, at an elevation of 1,900 m in pine-oak forest, and a nearby locality at 2,000 m in northern Veracruz (Woolrich- Piña and Smith 2012). Xenosaurus tzacualtipantecus is thought to belong to the northern clade of the genus, which also contains X. newmanorum and X. platyceps (Bhullar 2011). As with its congeners, X. tzacualtipantecus is an inhabitant of crevices in limestone rocks. This species consumes beetles and lepidopteran larvae and gives birth to living young. The habitat of this lizard in the vicinity of the type locality is being deforested, and people in nearby towns have created an open garbage dump in this area. We determined its EVS as 17, in the middle of the high vulnerability category (see text for explanation), and its status by the IUCN and SEMAR- NAT presently are undetermined. This newly described endemic species is one of nine known species in the monogeneric family Xenosauridae, which is endemic to northern Mesoamerica (Mexico from Tamaulipas to Chiapas and into the montane portions of Alta Verapaz, Guatemala). All but one of these nine species is endemic to Mexico. Photo by Christian Berriozabal-Islas. Amphib. Reptile Conserv. | http://redlist-ARC.org 01 June 2013 | Volume 7 | Number 1 | e61 Copyright: © 2013 Wilson et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Com- mons Attribution–NonCommercial–NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License, which permits unrestricted use for non-com- Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 7(1): 1–47.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief Review of the Guatemalan Lizards of the Genus Anolis
    MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, NO. 91 A Brief Review of the Guatemalan Lizards of the Genus Anolis BY L. C. STUART ANN ARBOR MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN June 6, 1955 LIST OF THE MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS OF THE MUSEUM OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Address inquiries to the Director of the Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, Michigan *On sale from the University Press, 311 Maynard St., Ann Arbor, Michigan. Bound in Paper No. 1. Directions for Collecting and Preserving Specimens of Dragonflies for Museum Purposes. By E. B. Williamson. (1916) Pp. 15, 3 figures No. 2. An Annotated List of the Odonata of Indiana. By E. B. Williamson. (1917) Pp. 12, 1 map No. 3. A Collecting Trip to Colombia, South America. By E. B. Williamson. (1918) Pp. 24 (Out of print) No. 4. Contributions to the Botany of Michigan. By C. K. Dodge. (1918) Pp. 14 No. 5. Contributions to the Botany of Michigan, II. By C. K. Dodge. (1918) Pp. 44, 1 map No. 6. A Synopsis of the Classification of the Fresh-water Mollusca of North America, North of Mexico, and a Catalogue of the More Recently Described Species, with Notes. By Bryant Walker. (1918) Pp. 213, 1 plate, 233 figures No. 7. The Anculosae of the Alabama River Drainage. By Calvin Goodrich. (1922) Pp. 57, 3 plates No. 8. The Amphibians and Reptiles of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. By Alexander G. Ruthven. (1922) Pp. 69, 13 plates, 2 figures, 1 map No. 9. Notes on American Species of Triacanthagyna and Gynacantha.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpetology at the Isthmus Species Checklist
    Herpetology at the Isthmus Species Checklist AMPHIBIANS BUFONIDAE true toads Atelopus zeteki Panamanian Golden Frog Incilius coniferus Green Climbing Toad Incilius signifer Panama Dry Forest Toad Rhaebo haematiticus Truando Toad (Litter Toad) Rhinella alata South American Common Toad Rhinella granulosa Granular Toad Rhinella margaritifera South American Common Toad Rhinella marina Cane Toad CENTROLENIDAE glass frogs Cochranella euknemos Fringe-limbed Glass Frog Cochranella granulosa Grainy Cochran Frog Espadarana prosoblepon Emerald Glass Frog Sachatamia albomaculata Yellow-flecked Glass Frog Sachatamia ilex Ghost Glass Frog Teratohyla pulverata Chiriqui Glass Frog Teratohyla spinosa Spiny Cochran Frog Hyalinobatrachium chirripoi Suretka Glass Frog Hyalinobatrachium colymbiphyllum Plantation Glass Frog Hyalinobatrachium fleischmanni Fleischmann’s Glass Frog Hyalinobatrachium valeroi Reticulated Glass Frog Hyalinobatrachium vireovittatum Starrett’s Glass Frog CRAUGASTORIDAE robber frogs Craugastor bransfordii Bransford’s Robber Frog Craugastor crassidigitus Isla Bonita Robber Frog Craugastor fitzingeri Fitzinger’s Robber Frog Craugastor gollmeri Evergreen Robber Frog Craugastor megacephalus Veragua Robber Frog Craugastor noblei Noble’s Robber Frog Craugastor stejnegerianus Stejneger’s Robber Frog Craugastor tabasarae Tabasara Robber Frog Craugastor talamancae Almirante Robber Frog DENDROBATIDAE poison dart frogs Allobates talamancae Striped (Talamanca) Rocket Frog Colostethus panamensis Panama Rocket Frog Colostethus pratti Pratt’s Rocket
    [Show full text]
  • Download Vol. 9, No. 3
    BULLETIN OF THE FLOIRIDA STATE MUSEUM BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES Volume 9 Number 3 NEW AND NOTEWORTHY AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES FROM BRITISH HONDURAS Wilfred T. Neill 6 1 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA Gainesville 1965 Numbers of the) BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM are pub- lished at irregular intervals.. Volumes, contain about 800 pages ard aft not nec- essarily completed in' any dne calendar year. WALTER AUFFENBERG, Managing Editor OLIVER L. AUSTIN, JR., Editor Consultants for this issue: John M. Legler Jay M. Savage Communications concerning·purchase of exchange of the publication and all man« uscripts should be addressed to the Managing Editor of the Bulletin„ Florida State Museum, Seagle Building, Gainesville, Florida. Published 9 April 1965 Price for 'this issue, *70 NEW AND NOTEWORTHY AMPHIBIANS AND REPTILES FROM BRITISH HONDURAS WILFRED T. NEILL 1 SYNOPSiS. Syrrhophus leprus .cholorum new subspecies, Fic#nia ·publia toolli- sohni new subspecies, and Kinosternon mopanum new species are described. Eleutherodactylus stantoni, Micrurus a#inis alienus, Bothrops atfox asper, and Crocodylus *noret~ti barnumbrowni are reduedd to synonymy. Anolis sagrei mavensis is removedfrom synonymy. ' Mabutja brachypoda is recognized. Ameiua undulata hartwegi and A. u. gaigeae interdigitate rather than intergrade. Eleutherodacfylus r..Iugulosus, 'Hula picta, Anolis nannodes, Cori,tophanes hernandesii, Sibon n. nebulata, Mic,urus nigrocinctus diuaricatus, Bothrops nasu- tus, and Kinosternon acutum are added to the British Honduras herpetofaunallist. Phrynohyas modesta, Anolis intermedius, Scaphiodontophis annulatus carpicinctus, Bothrops vucatanitus,- and Staurott/pus satuini are deleted from the list. New records are present~d for species whose existence in British Honduras was either recently discovered or inadequately documented: Rhinophrvnus dorsalis, Lepto- dactylus labiatis, Hyla microcephala martini, Phrunoht/as spilomma, Eumeces schwaftzei, Clelia clelia, Elaphe flavirufa pardalina.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecography ECOG-03593 Tarr, S., Meiri, S., Hicks, J
    Ecography ECOG-03593 Tarr, S., Meiri, S., Hicks, J. J. and Algar, A. C. 2018. A biogeographic reversal in sexual size dimorphism along a continental temperature gradient. – Ecography doi: 10.1111/ecog.03593 Supplementary material SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL A biogeographic reversal in sexual size dimorphism along a continental temperature gradient Appendix 1: Supplementary Tables and Figures Table A1. Placement of species missing from phylogeny. Species Comment Reference Most closely related to oaxaca and Campbell, J.A., et al. 2016. A new species of Abronia mixteca, most similar to mixteca Abronia cuetzpali (Squamata: Anguidae) from the Sierra Madre del Sur of according to Campbell et al. so add Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Herpetology 50: 149-156. as sister to mixteca Anolis alocomyos Both formerly part of tropidolepis, Köhler, G., et al. 2014. Two new species of the Norops & Anolis make a random clade with pachypus complex (Squamata, Dactyloidae) from Costa leditzigorum tropidolepis Rica. Mesoamerican Herpetology 1: 254–280. Part of a clade with microtus and Poe S, Ryan M.J. 2017. Description of two new species Anolis brooksi & ginaelisae so make a random clade similar to Anolis insignis (Squamata: Iguanidae) and Anolis kathydayae with these & brooksi & kathydayae, resurrection of Anolis (Diaphoranolis) brooksi. Amphibian based on Poe & Ryan. & Reptile Conservation 11: 1–16. Part of a clade with aquaticus and Köhler, J.J., et al. 2015. Anolis marsupialis Taylor 1956, a Anolis woodi so make a random clade with valid species from southern Pacific Costa Rica (Reptilia, marsupialis these Squamata, Dactyloidae). Zootaxa 3915111–122 Köhler, G., et al. 2016. Taxonomic revision of the Norops Anolis mccraniei, Formerly part of tropidonotus, so tropidonotus complex (Squamata, Dactyloidae), with the Anolis spilorhipis, split tropidonotus into a random resurrection of N.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Vol. 17, No. 2
    5. '6- 2'y-]irt--2 , 1 -< 4-41: 1 * 7 _ i,~ ,i tj ~,'~,4-2 . "in•'4~ ~SJ:f-'f~-47 4 23* :*S;':k f AL 1 4 2.- ~ r-1 4-4- r1 -f- - I I r + , . 4. 45 ' El -4~-- 77 N. -3'4 1(t ~~l.~1+ _.. ~ |.,.iX- 94." JI ~~,I €4, '''ilf,/I,1 '1|---_t;*· 1,·-·4", r».i'[ 1 f„ , -+ · . - 2/4 W L.1 -; N 152 1 17' M# · I ' ft "39 of the FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM Biological Sciences Volume 17 1973 Number 2 THE HERPETOFAUNA oF THE ISLAS DE LA BAHIA, HONDURAS Larry David Wilson Donald E. Hahn - 0 9.: . t.*, ..J , ''. '/'~:,1!''l, "',i , .1: '„,t?'' -'.5 , "4': 't. UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE Numbers of the BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA STATE MUSEUM, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, are published at irregular intervals. Volumes contain about 300 pages and are not necessarily completed in any one calendar year. OLIVER L. AUSTIN, JR., Editor Consultants for this issue: HOWARD W. CAMPBELL Roy McDIARMID Communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publication and all manu- scripts should be addressed to the Managing Editor of the Bulletin, Florida State Museum, Museum R6ad, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32601. This public document was promulgated at an annual cost of $2308.05 or $2.30.8 per copy. It makes available to libraries, scholars, and all interested persons the results of our researches in the natural sciences, emphasizing the Circum-Caribbean Re- gion. Publication date: 21 May, 1973 Price: $2.35 THE HERPETOFAUNA OF THE ISLAS DE LA BAHIA, HONDURAS LARRY DAVID WILSON AND DONALD E.
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Evolution of Adhesive Toepads and Claws in Anolis Lizards
    Stick or grip? Co-evolution of adhesive toepads and claws in Anolis lizards The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Crandell, Kristen E., Anthony Herrel, Mahmood Sasa, Jonathan B. Losos, and Kellar Autumn. 2014. “Stick or Grip? Co-Evolution of Adhesive Toepads and Claws in Anolis Lizards.” Zoology 117 (6) (December): 363–369. doi:10.1016/j.zool.2014.05.001. Published Version doi:10.1016/j.zool.2014.05.001 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:20444690 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#OAP *Manuscript 1 2 3 4 1 Stick or grip? Co-evolution of adhesive toepads and claws in Anolis lizards 5 6 7 2 Kristen E. Crandell1, Anthony Herrel2,3, Mahmood Sasa4,5, Jonathan B. Losos6, Kellar 8 9 3 Autumn7 10 11 12 4 13 14 15 5 1.Field Research Station at Fort Missoula, Division of Biological Sciences, University 16 17 6 of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA 18 19 20 7 email : [email protected] 21 22 23 24 8 2. UMR 7179 C.N.R.S/M.N.H.N., Département d'Ecologie et de Gestion de la 25 9 Biodiversité, 57 rue Cuvier, Case postale 55, 75231, Paris Cedex 5, France. 26 27 28 29 10 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Conservation Status of the Herpetofauna for an Area from North of Hidalgo, Mexico
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by SEDICI - Repositorio de la UNLP Trabajo Cuad. herpetol. 29 (2): 131-139 (2015) Diversity and conservation status of the herpetofauna for an area from north of Hidalgo, Mexico Luis M. Badillo-Saldaña, Aurelio Ramírez-Bautista, Daniel Lara-Tufiño, Christian Berriozabal-Islas Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo. Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas. Laboratorio de Ecología de Poblaciones. Apartado Postal 1-69, Plaza Juárez, 42001 Pachuca, Hidalgo, México. Recibido: 27 Febrero 2015 ABSTRACT Revisado: 14 Mayo 2015 Conservation measures currently lack adequate information to assign some species of amphib- Aceptado: 09 Junio 2015 ians and reptiles in the categories of protection. In this study we analyzed and compared the Editor Asociado: M. Vaira herpetofauna of mountain cloud forest (MCF) and tropical evergreen forest (TEF) in an area north of Hidalgo. For this study, we conducted fieldwork (24 sites) and a literature review. In addition, the conservation status of species was analyzed. The herpetofauna of the municipal- ity of Tepehuacan de Guerrero, Hidalgo, Mexico consists of 70 species (20 amphibians and 50 reptiles), nine of which are historical records that were not found in the present study. Cloud forest was more diverse (39 species) than TEF (37 species). There are discrepancies between national and international agencies of conservation regarding the threatened status of these spe- cies. The high biodiversity recorded in MCF and TEF in the study area indicates the importance of this area for conservation. In this study, we propose to reassess the conservation category of Hidalgo state herpetofauna.
    [Show full text]
  • Check List LISTS of SPECIES Check List 11(3): 1642, April 2015 Doi: ISSN 1809-127X © 2015 Check List and Authors
    11 3 1642 the journal of biodiversity data April 2015 Check List LISTS OF SPECIES Check List 11(3): 1642, April 2015 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/11.3.1642 ISSN 1809-127X © 2015 Check List and Authors Amphibians and reptiles of the state of Hidalgo, Mexico Julio A. Lemos-Espinal1* and Geoffrey R. Smith2 1 Laboratorio de Ecología-UBIPRO, FES Iztacala UNAM. Avenida los Barrios 1, Los Reyes Iztacala, Tlalnepantla, edo. de México, Mexico - 54090 2 Department of Biology, Denison University, Granville, OH, USA 43023 * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: We compiled a checklist of the amphibians crops. At higher elevations in the provinces of Sierra and reptiles of the state of Hidalgo, Mexico. The Madre Oriental and the Transvolcanic Belt, there are herpetofauna of Hidalgo consists of a total of 175 conifer forests of pine (Pinus spp.), oak (Quercus spp.), species: 54 amphibians (14 salamanders and 40 and Mexican Fir (Abies religiosa (Kunth) Schlechtendahl anurans); and 121 reptiles (one crocodile, five turtles, 36 and Chamisso, 1830), among other species. In the lizards, 79 snakes). These taxa represent 32 families (12 lower areas of these provinces is mountain cloud forest amphibian families, 20 reptile families) and 87 genera characterized by the most diverse vegetation type per (24 amphibian genera, 63 reptile genera). Two of these unit area of the country (Rzedowski 1996). The cloud species are non-native species (Hemidactylus frenatus forest of the mountains on the outskirts of the village Duméril and Bibron, 1836 and Indotyphlops braminus of La Mojonera is home to the most important Fagus (Daudin, 1803)).
    [Show full text]