Dr. A. Neil Hutton

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dr. A. Neil Hutton Climate Change Sun By Dr. A. Neil Hutton Sunspot Relative size of the Earth You are here www.cspg.org Climate Change Contents 1) Global Warming Debate..........................................................................................................................3 2) The World’s Historic Climate.................................................................................................................5 3) Carbon Dioxide ..................................................................................................................................... 11 4) The Greenhouse Effect ......................................................................................................................... 17 5) Here Comes the Sun ............................................................................................................................. 21 6) Fearmongering........................................................................................................................................ 29 7) The Spin Cycle ........................................................................................................................................ 35 8) Global Circulation Models .................................................................................................................. 39 9) Economics ............................................................................................................................................... 45 10) Afterword ............................................................................................................................................. 51 Climate Change was originally published as a ten-part series in the Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists’ monthly magazine, The Reservoir, between January and November 2009. The CSPG thanks Dr. Neil Hutton for his work in making this series possible. cover designed from images of the NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio The RESERVOIR is published 11 times per year by the Canadian Society No official endorsement or sponsorship by the CSPG is implied for any perform as expected or that they will give the desired results. Some of Petroleum Geologists. This includes a combined issue for the months advertisement, insert, or article that appears in the Reservoir unless information contained herein may be inaccurate or may vary from standard of July and August. The purpose of the RESERVOIR is to publicize the otherwise noted. All submitted materials are reviewed by the editor. We measurements. Society's many activities and to promote the geosciences. We look for both reserve the right to edit all submissions, including letters to the Editor. technical and non-technical material to publish. Additional information Submissions must include your name, address, and membership number The CSPG expressly disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions on the RESERVOIR's submission guidelines can be found at http:// (if applicable). The material contained in this publication is intended for or conduct of any third-party user of information contained in this www.cspg.org/publications/pubs-reservoir-submissions.cfm. informational use only. publication. Under no circumstances shall the CSPG and its officers, directors, employees, and agents be liable for any injury, loss, damage or The contents of this publication may not be reproduced either in part or While reasonable care has been taken, authors and the CSPG make no expense arising in any manner whatsoever from the acts, omissions or in full without the consent of the publisher. guarantees that any of the equations, schematics, or devices discussed will conduct of any third-party user. CLIMATE CHANGE I: Global Warming Debate by Dr. A. Neil Hutton A while ago, it came to my attention that however warming, in itself, does not prove proxy values with depth. The burial pressure APEGGA was undertaking a survey of the hypothesis of global warming as a result range of the ice cores is from 5 bars to 15 Members’ views on the subject of Climate of the release of carbon dioxide in the bars or 5-15 atmospheres, a maximum of Change. In reviewing responses to other atmosphere. Nevertheless, the manmade, or about 220 psi. It appears that decompression surveys, such as those generated by AAPG, it “Anthropogenic, Global Warming, results in CO2 depletion. Nevertheless, this was evident that the responders ranged over Hypothesis” has been widely accepted by the rather invariant proxy data was an entire spectrum of opinion. Many appeared media and the public. Global warming studies inappropriately linked to observational data not to be fully conversant with the range of have become big business. Indeed, it has from the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii. current, related research or were relying attained near religious status among the The result is a flat historic graph melded only on the uncritical reporting by the media. green lobby, resulting in unwarranted with the modern data scaled to provide a On the whole, the media have done a personal attacks on some scientists’ dramatic right angle and near vertical climb remarkably poor job in reporting on global credibility and integrity and attempts to place in modern CO2 values. warming. Typically, the reports have been a them in the same category as holocaust simple regurgitation of the spin produced by deniers. The objectivity and impartiality of The curve is visually dramatic but conceals the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate peer review has been compromised while an unacknowledged change of age. The Change (IPCC). research funding becomes more difficult to youngest proxy from the Siple Ice Core is obtain for those expressing critical views. 1890 with a value of 328 ppmv but the entire The use of the term “spin” may seem an data set was arbitrarily moved to fit Mauna unusual way in which to characterize At this point I will quote a comment by Loa data for 1973. This appears to have been objective scientific reports. However the meteorologist Piers Corbyn in the Weather done to conceal an inconveniently high pre- IPCC Summary for Policymakers (SPM), Action Bulletin, December, 2000: “The industrial value for CO2 of 328 ppmv. where the media generally obtain their problem we are faced with is that the information, does not always reflect the meteorological establishment and the global 2 Human activities have warmed the opinions in the scientific report and in some warming lobby research bodies which climate since 1750. instances actually contradicts the conclusions receive large funding are now apparently so of the scientists. For example, the IPCC corrupted by the largesse they receive that This is an unwarranted assertion which is Summary for Policy makers, (IPCC 2001b, p. the scientists in them have sold their not supported by facts. 10) states that “there is new and stronger integrity.” It is worth mentioning here that evidence that most of the warming observed even under President George Bush, the 3. The warmth of the last half-century is in the last 50 years is attributable to human United States has spent $29 billion on climate unusual. It is the highest in at least the activities”. Although in the scientific report research in the last six years. This is more past 1,300 years, and is “very likely” itself, (IPCC 2001a, Chapter 1, p. 97) the than double what was spent on the Apollo caused by increases in anthropogenic conclusion is quite different: “The fact that Space Program. greenhouse gases. the global mean temperature has increased since the late 19th Century and that other The SPM of the IPCC Fourth Assessment This assertion is based on the infamous Mann trends have been observed does not Report made four basic points, none of which hockey stick graph, which has been shown necessarily mean that an anthropogenic effect can be supported scientifically. In order to to be totally invalid in a number of scientific on the climate system has been identified. support their arguments, there has been a papers and by the Wegman Commission of Climate has always varied on all time scales, pattern of data manipulation in a highly the United States Congress. Not withstanding so the observed change may be natural.” unscientific attempt to confirm the the scathing criticism of this work by many anthropogenic (man-made) warming theory. authors, it continues in widespread use by In an extraordinary move last spring the IPCC the IPCC with minor modification in the 2007 released the 21-page SPM for the Fourth The four cornerstones of the of the IPCC report. The IPCC has been shown to have Assessment Report (2007) more than three global warming hypothesis are: violated its own rules in its 2007 attempt to months ahead of the 1,600-page scientific rebut criticisms of the “hockey stick”. All report. This was to ensure that the scientific 1. Carbon Dioxide, the most important this to evade acknowledging worldwide report was consistent with the SPM. In other anthropogenic greenhouse gas, evidence of the Little Ice Age, the Medieval words the science was not to conflict with increased markedly as a result of human Warm Period, and the Roman Warm Period. the politics! activities, and its atmospheric Both of the latter periods of warming had concentration of 379 ppmv (parts per temperatures greater than our present The general public and the media, apparently, million by volume) in 2005 far exceeded warming. This was brilliantly documented by are quite unaware of these contradictions the natural range of 180
Recommended publications
  • Using Concrete Scales: a Practical Framework for Effective Visual Depiction of Complex Measures Fanny Chevalier, Romain Vuillemot, Guia Gali
    Using Concrete Scales: A Practical Framework for Effective Visual Depiction of Complex Measures Fanny Chevalier, Romain Vuillemot, Guia Gali To cite this version: Fanny Chevalier, Romain Vuillemot, Guia Gali. Using Concrete Scales: A Practical Framework for Effective Visual Depiction of Complex Measures. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2013, 19 (12), pp.2426-2435. 10.1109/TVCG.2013.210. hal-00851733v1 HAL Id: hal-00851733 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00851733v1 Submitted on 8 Jan 2014 (v1), last revised 8 Jan 2014 (v2) HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Using Concrete Scales: A Practical Framework for Effective Visual Depiction of Complex Measures Fanny Chevalier, Romain Vuillemot, and Guia Gali a b c Fig. 1. Illustrates popular representations of complex measures: (a) US Debt (Oto Godfrey, Demonocracy.info, 2011) explains the gravity of a 115 trillion dollar debt by progressively stacking 100 dollar bills next to familiar objects like an average-sized human, sports fields, or iconic New York city buildings [15] (b) Sugar stacks (adapted from SugarStacks.com) compares caloric counts contained in various foods and drinks using sugar cubes [32] and (c) How much water is on Earth? (Jack Cook, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution and Howard Perlman, USGS, 2010) shows the volume of oceans and rivers as spheres whose sizes can be compared to that of Earth [38].
    [Show full text]
  • Charles and Ray Eames's Powers of Ten As Memento Mori
    chapter 2 Charles and Ray Eames’s Powers of Ten as Memento Mori In a pantheon of potential documentaries to discuss as memento mori, Powers of Ten (1968/1977) stands out as one of the most prominent among them. As one of the definitive works of Charles and Ray Eames’s many successes, Pow- ers reveals the Eameses as masterful designers of experiences that communi- cate compelling ideas. Perhaps unexpectedly even for many familiar with their work, one of those ideas has to do with memento mori. The film Powers of Ten: A Film Dealing with the Relative Size of Things in the Universe and the Effect of Adding Another Zero (1977) is a revised and up- dated version of an earlier film, Rough Sketch of a Proposed Film Dealing with the Powers of Ten and the Relative Size of Things in the Universe (1968). Both were made in the United States, produced by the Eames Office, and are widely available on dvd as Volume 1: Powers of Ten through the collection entitled The Films of Charles & Ray Eames, which includes several volumes and many short films and also online through the Eames Office and on YouTube (http://www . eamesoffice.com/ the-work/powers-of-ten/ accessed 27 May 2016). The 1977 version of Powers is in color and runs about nine minutes and is the primary focus for the discussion that follows.1 Ralph Caplan (1976) writes that “[Powers of Ten] is an ‘idea film’ in which the idea is so compellingly objectified as to be palpably understood in some way by almost everyone” (36).
    [Show full text]
  • Urantia, a Cosmic View of the Architecture of the Universe
    Pr:rt llr "Lost & First Men" vo-L-f,,,tE 2 \c 2 c6510 ADt t 4977 s1 50 Bryce Bond ot the Etherius Soeie& HowTo: ond, would vou Those Stronge believe. Animol Mutilotions: Aicin Wotts; The Urontic BookReveols: N Volume 2, Number 2 FRONTIERS April,1977 CONTENTS REGULAR FEATURES_ Editorial .............. o Transmissions .........7 Saucer Waves .........17 Astronomy Lesson ...... ........22 Audio-Visual Scanners ...... ..7g Cosmic Print-Outs . ... .. ... .... .Bz COSMIC SPOTLIGHTS- They Came From Sirjus . .. .....Marc Vito g Jack, The Animal Mutilator ........Steve Erdmann 11 The Urantia Book: Architecture of the Universe 26 rnterview wirh Alan watts...,f ro, th" otf;lszidThow ut on the Frontrers of science; rr"u" n"trno?'rnoLllffill sutherly 55 Kirrian photography of the Human Auracurt James R. Wolfe 58 UFOs and Time Travel: Doing the Cosmic Wobble John Green 62 CF SERIAL_ "Last & paft2 First Men ," . Olaf Stapledon 35 Cosmic Fronliers;;;;;;J rs DUblrshed Editor: Arthur catti bi-morrhiyy !y_g_oynby Cosm i publica- Art Director: Vincent priore I ons, lnc. at 521 Frith Av.nr."Jb.ica- | New York,i:'^[1 New ';;'].^iffiiYork 10017. I Associate Art Director: Fiank DeMarco Copyright @ 1976 by Cosmic Contributing Editors:John P!blications.l-9,1?to^ lnc, Alt ?I,^c-::Tf riohrs re- I creen, Connie serued, rncludrnqiii,jii"; i'"''1,1.",th€ irqlil ot lvlacNamee. Charles Lane, Wm. Lansinq Brown. jon T; I reproduction ,1wr-or€rn whol€ o,or Lnn oarrpa.'. tsasho Katz, A. A. Zachow, Joseph Belv-edere SLngle copy price: 91.50 I lnside Covers: Rico Fonseca THE URANTIA BOOK: lhe Cosmic view of lhe ARCHITECTURE of lhe UNIVERSE -qnd How Your Spirit Evolves byA.A Zochow Whg uos monkind creoted? The Isle of Paradise is a riers, the Creaior Sons and Does each oJ us houe o pur.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Science - Where Is the Recent Warming?
    Better Science - Where is the Recent Warming? Two Friends of Science members published the following letters in the Readers’ Forum section of the September 2012 issue of “The PEG Magazine”, the official publication of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA). HERE'S SOME BETTER SCIENCE Re: Online Denials Not Well Founded, by J. Edward Mathison, P.Geol., and Let's Get Back to Applying Science, by Joe Green, P.Eng., Readers' Forum, The PEG,April 2012. A return to the appropriate application of science would be most welcome. But how do we define Science? Since the 17th century a scientific method with accepted standards has developed. Researchers propose hypotheses as explanations of observed phenomena and design experimental studies to test them. Fundamental is the principle of full transparency, with data and methodology archived and shared so results can be verified and reproduced independently by other scientists. This has not been the pattern for the climatologists in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, who have shown a total disregard for these procedures by withholding data, refusing to reveal or discuss methodology, and essentially ignoring evidence contrary to their hypothesis. PhiI Jones of the Climate Research Unit of the U.K.'s University of East Anglia has not been forthcoming. Despite numerous freedom of information requests and enquiries, data and its associated methodology have not been fully released for independent due diligence. This is notwithstanding that this is the temperature data set presented as primary evidence of late 20th century warming, and the basis for draconian policy and taxation measures.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biblical View of the Cosmos the Earth Is Stationary
    A BIBLICAL VIEW OF THE COSMOS THE EARTH IS STATIONARY Dr Willie Marais Click here to get your free novaPDF Lite registration key 2 A BIBLICAL VIEW OF THE COSMOS THE EARTH IS STATIONARY Publisher: Deon Roelofse Postnet Suite 132 Private Bag x504 Sinoville, 0129 E-mail: [email protected] Tel: 012-548-6639 First Print: March 2010 ISBN NR: 978-1-920290-55-9 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Cover design: Anneette Genis Editing: Deon & Sonja Roelofse Printing and binding by: Groep 7 Printers and Publishers CK [email protected] Click here to get your free novaPDF Lite registration key 3 A BIBLICAL VIEW OF THE COSMOS CONTENTS Acknowledgements...................................................5 Introduction ............................................................6 Recommendations..................................................14 1. The creation of heaven and earth........................17 2. Is Genesis 2 a second telling of creation? ............25 3. The length of the days of creation .......................27 4. The cause of the seasons on earth ......................32 5. The reason for the creation of heaven and earth ..34 6. Are there other solar systems?............................36 7. The shape of the earth........................................37 8. The pillars of the earth .......................................40 9. The sovereignty of the heaven over the earth .......42 10. The long day of Joshua.....................................50 11. The size of the cosmos......................................55 12. The age of the earth and of man........................59 13. Is the cosmic view of the bible correct?..............61 14.
    [Show full text]
  • (1) a Directory to Sources Of
    DOCUMENT' RESUME ED 027 211 SE006 281 By-McIntyre, Kenneth M. Space ScienCe Educational Media Resources, A Guide for Junior High SchoolTeachers. NatiOnal Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C. Pub Date Jun 66 Note-108p. Available from-National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C.($3.50) EDRS Price MF -$0.50 HC Not Available from EDRS. Descriptors-*Aerospace Technology, Earth Science, Films, Filmstrips, Grade 8,*Instructional Media, *Resource Guides, *Science Activities, *Secondary School Science, Teaching Guides,Transparencies Identifiers-National Aeronautics and Space AdMinistration This guide, developed bya panel of teacher consultants, is a correlation of educational mediaresources with the "North Carolina Curricular Bulletin for Eighth Grade Earth and Space Science" and thestate adopted textbook, pModern Earth Science." The three maior divisionsare (1) the Earth in Space (Astronomy), (2) Space Exploration, and (3) Meterology. Included. for theprimary topics under each division are (1) statements of concepts, (2) student activities, and (3) annotated listings of films, filmstrips, film-loops, transparencies, slides,and other forms of instructional media. Appendixesare (1) a directory to sources of instructional media, (2) a title index to the films and filmstrips cited, (3)a listing of bibliographies, guides, and printed materials related to aerospace edUcation. (RS) DOCUMENT. RESUM.E. ED 027 211 SE 006 281 By-McIntyre, Kenneth M. Space ScienCe Educational Media Resources, A Guide for JuniorHigh School Teachers. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C. Pub Date Jun 66 Note-108p. Available from-National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D.C.($3.50) EDRS Price MF -$0.50 HC Not Available from EDRS.
    [Show full text]
  • Radio Canada's
    Friends of Science friendsofscience.org climatechange101.ca Press Release November 26, 2019 Radio Canada’s “Décrypteurs” Climate Fail (CALGARY) Friends of Science Society have issued a letter to Radio Canada condemning recent coverage of the CLINTEL “No Climate Emergency” declaration as poor and biased journalism. On Nov. 23, 2019, fact-checkers at Radio Canada’s “Décrypteurs” claim to have deconstructed the list of scientists who issued the Climate Intelligence - CLINTEL “No Climate Emergency” declaration to the UN. A larger group of CLINTEL signatories and expanded scientific explanation was presented on Nov. 20, 2019 to the European Parliament, as reported by the Global Warming Policy Foundation. Radio Canada’s fact-checking team claim few of the CLINTEL signatories are climate scientists, but this is a term which only came into use about 2005. It is irrelevant in the complex field of climate where physicists, atmospheric scientists, geoscientists, astrophysicists, oceanographers, volcanologists and chemists among others, all have input to and understanding of climate change science. Radio Canada relies on information from the International Fact Checking Network (IFCN). IFCN certified “Climate Feedback” as an accurate source to evaluate such climate news, but it is really a group of self- interested scientists who issued a disrespectful and fact-fail review of the CLINTEL ‘No Climate Emergency” document, as detailed in this Friends of Science rebuttal. While the “Décrypteurs” claim some CLINTEL signatories are not scientists, it is ironic that CBC/Radio Canada regularly report on Al Gore’s climate proclamations and give headline coverage to Greta Thunberg, neither of whom are climate scientists and both of whom are engaged in a global carbon offset promotion scheme.
    [Show full text]
  • BLACK SWANS by Dr Gerrit J. Van Der Lingen (© 2015)
    BLACK SWANS By Dr Gerrit J. van der Lingen (© 2015) Christiana Figueres is a Costa Rican diplomat. She was appointed Executive Secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) on May 17, 2010. She succeeded Yvo de Boer. The UNFCCC organises annual climate conferences, called COPs (Conferences Of the Parties to the UNFCCC). The first one was held in Berlin in 1995. The last one (COP20), at the time of writing this essay, was in Lima, Peru, 1-12 December 2014. Christiana Figueras chaired that conference. In her opening address she said, among other, the following: “The calendar of science loudly warns us that we are running out of time”, and “Here in Lima we must plant the seeds of a new, global construct of high quality growth, based on unparalleled collaboration building across all previous divides. History, dear friends, will judge us not only for how many tonnes of greenhouse gases we were able to reduce, but also by whether we were able to protect the most vulnerable, to alleviate poverty and to create a future with prosperity for all”. Maurice Newman, Chairman of the Australian Prime Minister’s Business Advisory Council, wrote an article in The Australian newspaper of 8 May, 2015, titled: “The UN is using climate change as a tool, not an issue”. About Christina Figueres he wrote: “Why then, with such little evidence, does the UN insist the world spends hundreds of billions of dollars a year on futile climate change policies? Perhaps Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN’s framework on Climate Change has the answer? In Brussels last February she said, “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.” In other words, the real agenda is concentrated political authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Trillion Theory: a New Cosmic Theory
    European J of Physics Education Volume 11 Issue 4 1309-7202 Lukowich Trillion Theory: A New Cosmic Theory Ed Lukowich Cosmology Theorist from Calgary, Alberta, Canada Graduated from University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada [email protected] (Received 08.09.2019, Accepted 22.09.2019) INTRODUCTION Trillion Theory (TT), a new theory, estimates the cosmic origin at one trillion years. This calculation of thousands of eons is based upon a growth factor where solar systems age-out at a max of 15 billion years, only to recycle into even larger solar systems, inside of ancient galaxies that are as old as 200 billion to 900 billion years. TT finds a Black Hole inside of each sphere (planet, moon, sun). Black Holes built and recycled solar systems inside humongous galaxies over a trillion cosmic years. 5 possible future proofs for Trillion Theory. - Proof 1: Finding a Black Hole inside of a sphere. Cloaked Black Hole gives sphere axial spin and gravity. - Proof 2: Black Hole survives Supernova of its Sun. Discovery shows resultant Black Hole after a Supernova was always inside of its exploding Sun. - Proof 3: Discovery of a Black Hole graveyard. Where the Black Holes that occupied the spheres of a solar system are found naked, fighting for new light, after the Sun’s Supernova destroyed their system. - Proof 4: Discover that Supermassive Black Holes, at galaxy hubs, have evolved to be hundreds of billions of years old. - Proof 5: Emulate, inside of a laboratory, the actions of a Black Hole spinning light into matter. This discovery shows how Black Holes capture and spin light to build spheres.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyoto Accord
    Kyoto Accord A reproduction of the 2002 debate solicited by APEGGA Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta Published in “The PEGG” journal and on-line Between Matt McCulloch, P.Eng., is with the Calgary office of the Pembina Institute for Appro- priate Development, in a lead technical role in the institute's Eco-Solutions Group. Dr. Matt Bramley is the Pembina Institute's director of climate change. And Dr. Sallie Baliunas is deputy director at Mount Wilson Observatory and an astrophys- icist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Dr. Tim Patterson is professor of geology (paleoclimatology) in the Department of Earth Sciences at Carleton University. Allan M.R. MacRae, P.Eng., is a Calgary investment banker and environmentalist. Views expressed are not necessarily those of any institution with which they are affiliated. This paper reflects the scientific view of Friends of Science Society whose scientific advisors in 2002 included Dr. Sallie Baliunas and Dr. Tim Patterson. THE KYOTO ACCORD Editor's Note: The PEGG solicited the following exchange on the Kyoto Accord and the science behind it, in an effort to provide two divergent views of the debate. The Point side is in favour of the science behind Kyoto and its implementation; the Counterpoint side dis- putes the science and doesn't agree that the accord, as it currently stands, is an accepta- ble way to address climate change. Each side received an advance copy of the other's argument, allowing them to write rebuttals, which also appear here. ________________________________________ POINT BY MATT McCULLOCH, P.ENG. and MATTHEW BRAMLEY, PhD Atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) are rising rapidly as a result of human activities, mainly the burning of fossil fuels.
    [Show full text]
  • You Are Right. I Am ALARMED--But by Climate Change Counter Movement
    You are right. I am ALARMED – But by Climate Change Counter Movement Shraey Bhatia Jey Han Lau Timothy Baldwin School of Computing and Information Systems The University of Melbourne [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract German evolutionary biologist and physiologist Prof. Dr. Ulrich Kutschera told in an interview The world is facing the challenge of climate crisis. Despite the consensus in scientific com- that CO2 is a blessing for mankind and that the munity about anthropogenic global warming, claimed 97% consensus among scientists is a the web is flooded with articles spreading cli- myth. ... he rejected extremes, among them the mate misinformation. These articles are care- climate alarmists who predict a fictitious, immi- fully constructed by climate change counter nent earth heat death and thus practice a kind of movement (CCCM) organizations to influence religious cult. the narrative around climate change. We re- visit the literature on climate misinformation New Zealand schools to terrify children about in social sciences and repackage it to introduce the climate crisis. Who cares about education in the community of NLP. Despite consider- if you believe the world is ending? What will it able work in detection of fake news, there is take for sanity to return? Global cooling? An- no misinformation dataset available that is spe- other Ice Age even? The climate lunatics ... en- cific to the domain.of climate change. We try courage them to wag school to protest for more to bridge this gap by scraping and releasing ar- ticles with known climate change misinforma- action. tion.
    [Show full text]
  • On Number Numbness
    6 On Num1:>er Numbness May, 1982 THE renowned cosmogonist Professor Bignumska, lecturing on the future ofthe universe, hadjust stated that in about a billion years, according to her calculations, the earth would fall into the sun in a fiery death. In the back ofthe auditorium a tremulous voice piped up: "Excuse me, Professor, but h-h-how long did you say it would be?" Professor Bignumska calmly replied, "About a billion years." A sigh ofreliefwas heard. "Whew! For a minute there, I thought you'd said a million years." John F. Kennedy enjoyed relating the following anecdote about a famous French soldier, Marshal Lyautey. One day the marshal asked his gardener to plant a row of trees of a certain rare variety in his garden the next morning. The gardener said he would gladly do so, but he cautioned the marshal that trees of this size take a century to grow to full size. "In that case," replied Lyautey, "plant them this afternoon." In both of these stories, a time in the distant future is related to a time closer at hand in a startling manner. In the second story, we think to ourselves: Over a century, what possible difference could a day make? And yet we are charmed by the marshal's sense ofurgency. Every day counts, he seems to be saying, and particularly so when there are thousands and thousands of them. I have always loved this story, but the other one, when I first heard it a few thousand days ago, struck me as uproarious. The idea that one could take such large numbers so personally, that one could sense doomsday so much more clearly ifit were a mere million years away rather than a far-off billion years-hilarious! Who could possibly have such a gut-level reaction to the difference between two huge numbers? Recently, though, there have been some even funnier big-number "jokes" in newspaper headlines-jokes such as "Defense spending over the next four years will be $1 trillion" or "Defense Department overrun over the next four years estimated at $750 billion".
    [Show full text]