DOCSLIB.ORG

Safety and Security Tech Memo

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Safety and Security Tech Memo DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Appendix P Safety and Security Technical Memorandum DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Chicago Red Line Extension Project Safety and Security Technical Memorandum April 27, 2015 Updated September 9, 2015 Prepared for: Chicago Transit Authority 567 W. Lake Street Chicago, IL 60661 Prepared by: 125 S. Wacker Drive Suite 600 Chicago, IL 60606 SAFETY AND SECURITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Table of Contents Section 1 Summary ................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Safety and Security Defined ..................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Key Findings ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2.1 No Build Alternative ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2.2 Bus Rapid Transit Alternative ........................................................................ 1-1 1.2.3 Union Pacific Railroad Rail Alternative ........................................................... 1-2 1.2.4 Halsted Rail Alternative ................................................................................. 1-3 1.3 2014–2015 Red Line Extension Project Update ........................................................ 1-4 Section 2 Introduction ............................................................................................... 2-1 Section 3 Methods for Impact Evaluation ................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Regulatory Framework ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Federal .......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.2 State .............................................................................................................. 3-2 3.1.3 Regional and Local ........................................................................................ 3-3 3.1.3.1 Regional Transportation Authority of Northeastern Illinois ................. 3-3 3.1.3.2 Chicago Transit Authority .................................................................. 3-3 3.1.3.3 City of Chicago.................................................................................. 3-4 3.1.3.4 Village of Calumet Park ..................................................................... 3-5 3.1.4 Other ............................................................................................................. 3-5 3.1.4.1 National Fire Protection Association.................................................. 3-5 3.1.4.2 Union Pacific Railroad ....................................................................... 3-6 3.2 Impact Analysis Thresholds ..................................................................................... 3-7 3.2.1 Construction Impacts ..................................................................................... 3-7 3.3 Area of Potential Impact ........................................................................................... 3-8 3.4 Methods ................................................................................................................... 3-8 3.4.1 Safety ............................................................................................................ 3-9 3.4.2 Security ....................................................................................................... 3-10 Section 4 Affected Environment ................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Bus Rapid Transit Alternative ................................................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Major Safety and Security Incidents on CTA Bus System .............................. 4-1 4.1.2 Crime Summary ............................................................................................. 4-1 i SAFETY AND SECURITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 4.1.3 Pedestrian Safety .......................................................................................... 4-2 4.1.4 Pedestrian Security ....................................................................................... 4-4 4.1.5 Emergency Services ...................................................................................... 4-4 4.2 Union Pacific Railroad Rail Alternative ..................................................................... 4-4 4.2.1 Major Safety and Security Incidents on CTA Rail System .............................. 4-4 4.2.2 Crime Summary ............................................................................................. 4-4 4.2.3 Segment UA .................................................................................................. 4-7 4.2.3.1 Pedestrian Safety .............................................................................. 4-7 4.2.3.2 Pedestrian Security ......................................................................... 4-10 4.2.3.3 Highway-Rail Grade Crossings ....................................................... 4-10 4.2.3.4 Emergency Services ....................................................................... 4-12 4.2.4 Segment UB ................................................................................................ 4-12 4.2.4.1 Pedestrian Safety ............................................................................ 4-12 4.2.4.2 Pedestrian Security ......................................................................... 4-14 4.2.4.3 Emergency Services ....................................................................... 4-14 4.3 Halsted Rail Alternative .......................................................................................... 4-15 4.3.1 Major Safety and Security Incidents on CTA Rail System ............................ 4-15 4.3.2 Crime Summary ........................................................................................... 4-15 4.3.3 Segment HA ................................................................................................ 4-15 4.3.3.1 Pedestrian Safety ............................................................................ 4-15 4.3.3.2 Pedestrian Security ......................................................................... 4-19 4.3.3.3 Emergency Services ....................................................................... 4-19 4.3.4 Segment HB ................................................................................................ 4-19 4.3.4.1 Pedestrian Safety ............................................................................ 4-19 4.3.4.2 Pedestrian Security ......................................................................... 4-20 4.3.4.3 Emergency Services ....................................................................... 4-21 Section 5 Impacts and Mitigations ............................................................................. 5-1 5.1 No Build Alternative ................................................................................................. 5-1 5.2 Bus Rapid Transit Alternative ................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.1 Permanent Impacts and Mitigations - Bus Rapid Transit Alternative .............. 5-1 5.2.2 Construction Impacts and Mitigations - Bus Rapid Transit Alternative ............ 5-5 5.2.3 Cumulative Impacts and Mitigations – Bus Rapid Transit Alternative .............. 5-5 5.3 Union Pacific Railroad Rail Alternative - Right-of-Way Option .................................. 5-6 ii SAFETY AND SECURITY TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 5.3.1 Permanent Impacts and Mitigations - Union Pacific Railroad Rail Alternative - Right-of-Way Option .................................................................. 5-6 5.3.1.1 Segment UA ..................................................................................... 5-6 5.3.1.2 Segment UB ................................................................................... 5-10 5.3.2 Construction Impacts and Mitigations - Union Pacific Railroad Rail Alternative - Right-of-Way Option ................................................................ 5-12 5.3.2.1 Segment UA ................................................................................... 5-12 5.3.2.2 Segment UB ................................................................................... 5-13 5.3.3 Cumulative Impacts and Mitigations – Union Pacific Railroad Rail Alternative - Right-of-Way Option ................................................................ 5-13 5.3.4 120th Street Yard and Shop......................................................................... 5-13 5.3.4.1 Permanent Impacts and Mitigations ................................................ 5-13 5.3.4.2 Construction Impacts and Mitigations .............................................. 5-14 5.4 Union Pacific Railroad Rail Alternative - East Option .............................................. 5-14 5.4.1 Permanent Impacts and Mitigations - Union Pacific Railroad Rail Alternative - East Option .............................................................................. 5-14 5.4.1.1 Segment UA ................................................................................... 5-14 5.4.1.2 Segment UB ................................................................................... 5-17 5.4.2 Construction Impacts and Mitigations - Union Pacific Railroad Rail Alternative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Purpose and Need Report
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Appendix D Purpose and Need Report DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Chicago Red Line Extension Project Purpose and Need Report May 25, 2016 Prepared for: Chicago Transit Authority 567 W. Lake Street Chicago, IL 60661 Prepared by: 125 S. Wacker Drive Suite 600 Chicago, IL 60606 PURPOSE & NEED REPORT Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 1-1 Section 2 The Purpose of the Red Line Extension Project .................................... 2-1 Section 3 The Need for the Red Line Extension Project ........................................ 3-1 Section 4 The Red Line Extension Project Area ................................................... 4-1 Section 5 Justification of the Purpose and Need ................................................... 5-1 5.1 Long Transit Trips to Job Centers for Far South Side Residents .............................5-1 5.2 Transit-Dependent Populations Lack Direct Access to Rapid Transit Rail Service ..5-6 5.3 Isolation from Major Activity Centers and Limited Viable Transportation Options ....5-8 5.4 Underserved Transit Markets and Limited Transit Connectivity ............................. 5-13 5.5 Disinvestment and Limited Economic Development Have Affected Far South Side Communities......................................................................................................... 5-15 5.6 The Need for a Rail Car Storage Yard and Maintenance Facility .......................... 5-17
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago Track Map [Pdf]
    Chicago Track Map Lehigh Ave To Waukegan & Kenosha, WI Wilmette To Antioch To Deerfield, Greyslake & Fox Lake Service Guide Amtrak to Milwaukee & All Points Northwest *27 *27 Glenview Greenleaf Ave *27 CTA Linden WILMETTE Green Bay Rd CTA Linden Yard Red Line Green Line Pink Line LAKE MICHIGAN Howard to 95th/Dan Ryan Harlem to Cottage Grove 54th/Cermak to Loop ‘L’ Glenayre Isabella All Times Weekdays: 4a to 12:50a Weekdays: 4a-1a GLENVIEW *27 Sat, Sun & Holidays: Sat, Sun & Holidays: 5a-1a Blue Line 5am to 12:50a O’Hare to Forest Park Harlem to Ashland/63rd Purple Line Central All Times Weekdays: 4:10a to 1:05a Linden to Howard Central St (Evanston) Sat, Sun & Holidays: Mon-Thu: 4:45a-1:30a Fri:4:50a-2:10a Brown Line 5:15a to 1:05a Sat: 5:30a-2:15a Sun & Holidays:6:30a-1:45a Kimball to Loop ‘L’ Linden to Loop ‘L’ Express Weekdays & Sat: 4a to 1a Orange Line Weekdays: 5:15a-9:15a, 2:25p-6:25p Golf Noyes Sun: 5a to 1a Midway to Loop ‘L’ Kimball to Belmont Weekdays: 3:30a-1:05a Yellow Line GOLF Weedays & Sat: 4a to 2a Harms Woods *26b Sat: 4a-1:05a Dempster-Skokie to Howard To Crystal Lake, McHenry & Harvard *26a Foster Holiday & Sun: 5a to 2a Green Bay Rd Sun & Holidays: 4:30a-1:05a Weekdays: 5a-11:15p Cumberland Sat, Sun & Holidays: 6:30a-11:15p East Northwest Hwy Emerson St Ave Benson Metra Lehigh Ave Davis Davis St Milwaukee Dist. North BNSF Railway Union Pacific Northwest (Evanston) Chicago Union Station to Fox Lake Chicago Union Station to Aurora Ogilvie T.C.
    [Show full text]
  • New All-Time Public Safety Record Set in 1961
    Annual subscription price: $2.00. Distributed free of charge to all active and retired CT A employes. Address communications to CT A TRANSIT NEWS, Room 742, Merchandise Mart Plaza, Chicago 54, Illinois. Phone: MOhawk 4-7200 Published monthly by and for employes of the Chicago Transit Authority, under the direction of the Public Information Department. DAVID E. EVANS, Editor NEW ALL-TIME PUBLIC SAFETY RECORD SET IN 1961 CTA TRAFFIC AND PASSENGER ACCIDENTS PER 100,000 MILES OPERATED (Reported and Employes of Chicago Transit Authority set a new public safety Blind Case Accidents) record in 1961 by cutting traffic and passenger accidents to an all-time low. This was the seventh consecutive year that an all- 0 5 10 15 20 time safety record has been established. 1947 20.9 CT A buses and trains were invol ved in 1,429 fewer traffic and 1948 18.5 passenger accidents in 1961 than in 1960, while traveling more .1949 than 151 million vehicle miles. The 1961 frequency rate is 7.7% 16.0 lower than the 1960 frequency rate and 39% better than the fre- 1950 quency rate in 1954, the year CTA inaugurated its comprehensive 17.3 safety program. 1951 19.3 1952 CTA's safety program includes formal training of CTA operating 16.9 and supervisory personnel and in addition an individual accident 1953 prevention retraining program, special refresher programs, an 15.1 interstation safety contest and many activities designed to help 1954 15.8 supervisory personnel improve their skills in recognizing unsafe 1955 conditions and taking necessary corrective actions.
    [Show full text]
  • System-Wide Rail Capacity Study
    SYSTEM-WIDE RAIL CAPACITY STUDY Over the last few decades, ridership on CTA rail lines has continued to grow. To evaluate the effect of this growth, CTA has conducted a system-wide study of rail line capacity that examined existing crowding on each rail line and identified segments that are currently at capacity or are expected to reach capacity limits in the near future. The study analyzed the relationship between capacity and physical constraints that impact CTA’s ability to respond to crowded conditions. The study also identified a series of high-level potential solutions to be explored further that could address capacity and crowding on the rail system in the future. WHAT IS CAPACITY? On any rail line, the maximum number of passengers that can be carried per hour is based on three measurements: the number of trains per hour that can be operated on the line, the number of rail cars in each train, and the amount of usable square feet on each rail car. According to Federal Transit Administration (FTA) guidelines, a train is considered overcrowded if each passenger has less than 5.4 square feet of usable space. Under this metric, each CTA rail car has a comfortable capacity of approximately 61 passengers. The total line capacity (or amount of space that can be supplied) of each CTA line under this crowding metric equals 61 passengers per car, multiplied by the number of cars per train and the number of trains per hour that are possible to operate on that line. The other component of capacity is passenger demand, or the total number of people that want to ride on the train.
    [Show full text]
  • Intent to Prepare an Environmental
    Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2011 / Notices 207 the SPR funds apportioned annually CTA operates the rapid transit system in a.m. at CTA Headquarters, in must be used for research, development, Cook County, Illinois. The proposed Conference Room 2A, 567 W. Lake and technology transfer activities. In project, described more completely Street, Chicago, IL 60661. accordance with government-wide grant within, would bring the North Red and Representatives of Native American management procedures, a grant Purple lines up to a state of good repair Tribal governments and Federal, State, application must be submitted for these from the track structure immediately regional, and local agencies that may funds. In addition, recipients must north of Belmont Station in Chicago, have an interest in any aspect of the submit periodic progress and financial Illinois to the Linden terminal in project will be invited to be reports. In lieu of Standard Form 424, Wilmette, Illinois. The purpose of this participating or cooperating agencies, as Application for Federal Assistance, the Notice of Intent is to (1) alert interested appropriate. FHWA uses a work program as the grant parties regarding the intent to prepare ADDRESSES: Comments will be accepted application. The information contained the EIS, (2) to provide information on at the public scoping meetings or they in the work program includes task the nature of the proposed project and may be sent to Mr. Steve Hands, descriptions, assignments of possible alternatives, and (3) to invite Strategic Planning and Policy, Chicago responsibility for conducting the work public participation in the EIS process.
    [Show full text]
  • L L L L R R R Table of Contents R List of Exhibits Ii R 1
    f r REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY r Engineering support Services for strategic Plan and Capital Investment Plan Implementation Task 6A Report Interstate Transfer Program May 13, 1988 Prepared by PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF QUADE & DOUGLAS, INC. Chicago, Illinois l l l L r r r Table of Contents r List of Exhibits ii r 1. Background of Assignment 1 2 . Overview of Interstate Transfer Program 1 3. Conduct of Task 3 4. Content of and Issues Affecting Chicago's IST-Transit Program 3 5 . Conclusions 11 6. Exhibits 13 l l l l l i r r I LIST OF EXHIBITS r Letter Source Title r A UMTA Letter 4/20/88, Ettinger to Williams re IST Program B IDOT Original IST Program Allocations c IDOT Revised IST Program Allocations D PBQD List of Documents Reviewed E PBQD List of Meetings held and persons contacted F IDOT Transfer 2 Project List, Federal Obligations through March 31, 1988 G DPW Description of Subway Renovation Program (As Revised May 1985) H DPW Quarterly Progress Report No. 16, Jackson Park Transit Improvement . Project, January 1988, Page 12 I IDOT Letter 2/29/88, Wheeler to Williams re Howard/Dan Ryan Rescoping Proposal J RTA Memorandum 1/27/88, Gaudette to Johnson and Hankett re SWT fleet requirement K UMTA Attachment 4 to UMTA - City of Chicago Grant Agreement, Amendment 03, Projec t IL-23-9020, July 28, 1986. (Cost Escalation) l l l L L ii 1. Background of Assignment r The April 20, 1988 letter from UMTA (Joel P. Ettinger - Area 5 Director) to Chicago DPW (David s.
    [Show full text]
  • Value Capture and Joint Development
    : VALUE CAPTURE AND JOINT DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FOR CTA PROPERTIES A A Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission Chicagojransit Authority November, 1986 ITRAN |HE 4491. C4 V215 HE 4491. C4 V215 3 5556 021 401 328 VALUE CAPTURE AND JOINT DEVELOPMENT: POTENTIAL FOR CTA PROPERTIES TRANSPORTATION LIBRARY November 1986 J UN m NORT.SWESTERN UNIVERSITY Submitted To: The Chicago Transit Authority Merchandise Mart Plaza, Post Office Box 3555 Chicago, Illinois 60654 Submitted by: The Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission 400 West Madison Street Chicago, Illinois 60606 Project Staff: Project Director: John H, Paige Project Manager: William D. Markle William D. Markle and Associates Project Planner: Lyle G, Gomm The preparation of this report was financed through a funding contribution received by the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission from the Chicago Transit Authority. The opinions, findings, and conclusions are not necessarily those of the funding agency. .•0* -- V ^1^ Table of Contents Page Table of Contents i Illustrations ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iii INTRODUCTION 1 VALUE CAPTURE AND JOINT DEVELOPMENT 2 CASE STUDIES 5 THE EIGHT STUDY SITES. 9 1. Howard Street Station 12 Present Development Process 17 2. Wilson Avenue Station 26 3. Belmont Avenue Station 35 4. Limits Garage 43 5. Cumberland Avenue Station 52 6. Damen Avenue Station 60 7. Harlem Avenue Station 69 8. Dorchester Avenue Station 77 DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE CTA 86 References 92 Illustrations Page Table I Transit Station Ridership Figures 10 Table II Bus Routes Near
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-0002.01 Issued for Bid Cta – 18Th Street Substation 2017-02-17 Dc Switchgear Rehabilitation Rev
    2017-0002.01 ISSUED FOR BID CTA – 18TH STREET SUBSTATION 2017-02-17 DC SWITCHGEAR REHABILITATION REV. 0 SECTION 00 01 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY 18TH STREET SUBSTATION DC SWITCHGEAR REHABILITATION 18TH SUBSTATION 1714 S. WABASH AVENEUE CHICAGO, IL 60616 PAGES VOLUME 1 of 1 - BIDDING, CONTRACT & GENERAL REQUIREMENTS BIDDING AND CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS 00 01 10 TABLE OF CONTENTS 00 01 10 LIST OF DRAWINGS DIVISION 01 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK 1-8 01 18 00 PROJECT UTILITY COORDINATION 1-2 01 21 16 OWNER’S CONTINGENCY ALLOWANCE 1-3 01 29 10 APPLICATIONS AND CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT 1-6 01 31 00 PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATION 1-5 01 31 19 PROJECT MEETINGS 1-4 01 31 23 PROJECT WEBSITE 1-3 01 32 50 CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE 1-12 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES 1-9 01 35 00 SPECIAL PROCEDURES SPECIAL PROCEDURES ATTACHMENTS 01 35 23 OWNER SAFETY REQUIREMENTS 1-28 01 42 10 REFERENCE STANDARDS AND DEFINITIONS 1-6 01 43 00 QUALITY ASSURANCE 1-2 01 45 00 QUALITY CONTROL 1-6 01 45 23 TESTING AND INSPECTION SERVICE 1-4 01 50 00 TEMPORARY FACILITIES AND CONTROLS 1-10 01 55 00 TRAFFIC REGULATION 1-4 01 60 00 PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS 1-4 01 63 00 PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES 1-3 01 73 29 CUTTING AND PATCHING 1-5 01 63 00 PRODUCT SUBSTITUTION PROCEDURES 1-3 01 78 23 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE DATA 1-7 01 77 00 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ASSET INFORMATION 1-2 Table of Contents 00 01 10-1 2017-0002.01 ISSUED FOR BID CTA – 18TH STREET SUBSTATION 2017-02-17 DC SWITCHGEAR REHABILITATION REV.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Requirements for Red and Purple
    PROJECT NO. 2014-0017.06 PART 3 – PROJECT REQUIREMENTS FOR RED AND PURPLE MODERNIZATION (RPM) PHASE ONE DESIGN-BUILD CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY Issued for Execution December 12, 2018 FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE BY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION SUPERVISED BY: CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY INFRASTRUCTURE DIVISION - CONSTRUCTION Red and Purple Modernization (RPM) Phase One Issued for Execution Design-Build December 12, 2018 PART 3 - PROJECT REQUIREMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 3.1 General Project Description 1 3.1.1 Project Limits 2 3.1.1.1 Overall Guideway Improvement Limits 3.1.1.2 At-Grade Civil Improvement Limits 3.1.1.3 Signal Corridor Improvement Limits 3.1.2 Pre-Stage Work 3 3.1.2.1 Existing Retaining Wall, Wing Wall and Ballast Curb Rehabilitation 3.1.2.2 CTA-Provided Materials 3.1.2.3 Pre-Stage Interlockings 3.1.2.4 Miscellaneous Traction Power Elements 3.1.2.5 Miscellaneous Trackwork 3.1.2.6 Signal System Elements 3.1.2.7 Communication Elements 3.1.2.8 Temporary Stations and Platforms 3.1.3 Red Purple Bypass (RPB) Work 10 3.1.3.1 Temporary Track RVT 3.1.3.2 Bypass Track NM5 3.1.3.3 Kenmore Interlocking 3.1.3.4 Existing Residential and Commercial Building Demolition 3.1.3.5 North Mainline (NM) Track 3.1.3.6 RV1/RV2 Structure Rehabilitation and Track Improvements 3.1.3.7 Miscellaneous Improvements 3.1.3.8 Vautravers Building Relocation and Rehabilitation 3.1.4 Lawrence to Bryn Mawr Modernization (LBMM) 12 3.1.4.1 Embankment and Retaining Walls 3.1.4.2 Winona Relay Room 3.1.4.3 North Mainline (NM) Track 3.1.4.4
    [Show full text]
  • SPINB Template
    North Red and Purple Modernization Project Scoping Report August 2011 Prepared for: Chicago Transit Authority 567 West Lake Street Chicago, IL 60661 Federal Transit Administration 200 West Adams Street Suite 320 Chicago, IL 60606 Prepared by: 125 South Wacker Drive Suite 600 Chicago, IL 60606 Scoping Report Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose of this Report ......................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Background ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.4 Project Area ........................................................................................... 1-2 1.5 Alternatives ........................................................................................... 1-3 1.5.1 No Action Alternative ............................................................ 1-3 1.5.2 Basic Rehabilitation Alternative ............................................ 1-3 1.5.3 Basic Rehabilitation with Transfer Stations Alternative .... 1-4 1.5.4 Modernization 4-Track Alternative ...................................... 1-4 1.5.5 Modernization 3-Track Alternative ...................................... 1-5 1.5.6 Modernization 2-Track Underground Alternative ............. 1-6 1.6 Summary of Purpose and Need ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Starts on New Howard Shop See Page 5 I in This Issue: I Executive's Message
    .January-Pebruary 1991 . Volume 44 - Number 1 Construction Starts on New Howard Shop See Page 5 I In This Issue: I Executive's Message EXECUTIVE'S MESSAGE 2 The year ahead for CTA will be both exciting and challenging. It will be exciting because of the many changes that will be coming to our agency. It will be challenging because of the many obstacles we face in making SKOKIE SHOP OPEN HOUSE 3 those changes. None of the changes will be possible without the full support of every- UNITED WAY- 4 one involved. With that in mind, let me share with you some of the major MAINTENANCE HELPING HANDS events we can look forward to in the coming months. NEW BUSES: After many frustrating delays, new buses manufactured 5 NEW HOWARD SHOP - by the TMC Corporation, of Rosewell, N.M., have finally begun arriving. SPIRIT OF CHICAGO By the beginning of February, we should have more than 100 in service. By the end of summer, all 491 will be in service. These will be the first CTA'S SAFEST YEAR- 6 mainline buses to offer wheelchair lift service for the disabled. Another MESSAGE FROM ELONZO HILL 470 buses are being manufactured by the Flxible Corporation, of Dela- ware, Ohio. Delivery is expected to begin in the summer. These new buses will represent nearly one-half of the fleet now in service. In the CTA RESERVISTS - 7 TRANSIT MEMORIES meantime, it is a credit to the hard work of the bus maintenance staff that we have been able to keep our oldest buses, some with more than 700,000 miles of service, in operation.
    [Show full text]
  • Regionally Significant Projects Benefits Report September 2017
    Draft ON TO 2050 Regionally Significant Projects Benefits Report September 2017 Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 3 Process ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Definition change from previous plans .............................................................................................. 4 Solicitation of projects............................................................................................................................ 5 Evaluation framework ......................................................................................................................... 13 Project evaluation ..................................................................................................................................... 13 Project cost estimates ........................................................................................................................... 13 Capital costs ...................................................................................................................................... 13 Operating costs ................................................................................................................................. 14 Cost summary for projects .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]