DOCSLIB.ORG

Fitting Strategies for Patients with Unilateral Hearing Loss

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Fitting Strategies for Patients with Unilateral Hearing Loss 12843.C09.PGS 3/8/02 11:11 AM Page 253 9 Fitting Strategies for Patients with Unilateral Hearing Loss MICHAEL VALENTE, MAUREEN VALENTE, JANE ENRIETTO, KAREN M. LAYTON Introduction Definition of Unilateral Hearing Loss Patients with unilateral hearing loss typi- For the purposes of this chapter, unilateral cally have difficulty with (1) locating the hearing loss is defined as unaidable hearing sources of sound, (2) understanding speech in one ear and normal hearing [15 dB hear- when the signal arrives on the side of the ing level (HL) or better at 250 to 8000 Hz] in poorer ear, and (3) understanding speech in the opposite ear. Unaidable hearing is de- background noise (especially if the noise is fined as an ear having one or more of the fol- arriving on the side of the better ear). Pa- lowing characteristics: tients with unilateral hearing loss can pres- 1. Profound sensorineural hearing loss so ent a challenge to the dispensing audiolo- that amplified sound cannot be heard gist. The dispenser can choose a traditional with any degree of usefulness. dispensing model, which suggests provid- 2. Very poor word recognition score. ing extensive counseling on the communica- 3. Marked intolerance for amplified tion problems likely to occur as a result of sounds. unilateral hearing loss, or recommend con- tralateral routing of the signal (CROS) am- plification to the good ear. On the other Incidence and Prevalence of Unilateral hand, the dispenser could explore with the Hearing Loss patient several alternate fitting strategies. This chapter focuses on the problems as- Although information is available regarding sociated with unilateral hearing loss and the incidence of unilateral hearing loss in provides information beneficial for dis- children (Bess and Tharpe, 1986; Kielmovitch pensers who want to explore alternative fit- and Friedman, 1988; Oyler et al, 1988; Brook- ting strategies for patients with unilateral houser et al, 1991), there is less information hearing loss. regarding the incidence of unilateral hearing 253 12843.C09.PGS 3/8/02 11:11 AM Page 254 254 STRATEGIES FOR SELECTING AND VERIFYING HEARING AID FITTINGS loss in adults. Much of the information re- (1991) estimated that nearly seven million garding the incidence of unilateral hearing Americans have some degree of unilateral loss in adults involves sudden hearing loss, hearing loss. They quoted a prevalence rate often as a result of illness (Van Dishoeck and for school-aged children of 3:1000 in which Bichman, 1957; Petheram, 1976; Shanon et al, hearing loss was 45 dB HL or greater, which 1982), otologic surgery (acoustic neuroma), increased to 13:1000 if milder losses (26 to 45 or nonotologic surgery (Arenberg et al, 1972; dB HL) were included. They provided no Wright and Saunders, 1975; Plasse et al, 1980; information for children under age 3 years. Millen et al, 1982). The authors reported that Everberg (1960) re- Rambur (1989) reported that the incidence vealed a greater prevalence of unilateral of sudden unilateral hearing loss in the deafness among males (62.3%) than females United States was approximately 40,000 per (37.7%); he also reported a higher rate of left year, equally distributed between males and ear impairment (52.5%). Of interest is that females. Her report and reports by Bye unilateral impairment is generally detected (1978) and Berg and Pallasch (1981) indicate later in life because speech and language that sudden hearing loss usually occurs in skills appear to develop more normally. Of adolescents or older adults, with the greatest Everberg’s 122 subjects, 52.5% were identi- incidence occurring between 30 and 60 years fied after the first year in school. Bess and of age (Megighian, 1986). Hearing loss was Tharpe (1986) cited Tarkkanen and Aho usually unilateral, although Rambur (1989) (1966) to corroborate these findings, with an and Megighian (1986) found bilateral sud- average identification age of 6 years. The den hearing loss in up to 17% of the cases. hearing loss in 50% of the children was not Bergenius (1985) studied vestibular find- detected until 7 years of age or older, which ings in sensorineural hearing loss. Of 1,635 the authors find unacceptable in view of the patients undergoing audiologic evaluation deleterious effects unilateral hearing loss has from 1979 to 1982, 12.9% fulfilled the criteria on academic performance (see below) (Bess for “pure unilateral sensorineural hearing and Tharpe, 1986). loss or tinnitus alone.” Noury and Katsarkas Brookhouser et al (1991) investigated uni- (1989) cited various references that stated lateral hearing loss in children, the results that sudden hearing loss has no sexual of which may lend information related to predilection and a mean age of occurrence adult populations. They also reported an in- between 40 and 47 years of age. Sudden cidence in unilateral hearing loss of 3:1000 hearing loss is usually unilateral, with bilat- when including hearing loss greater than 45 eral involvement reported in 7% of the cases. dB HL or 13:1000 when including hearing Although statistics related to children may loss between 26 and 45 dB HL. They re- not easily be generalized to adults, they may ported that Kinney (1953) found 1307 cases provide general trends. Oyler et al (1988) ex- of sensorineural hearing loss in children, of amined the incidence of unilateral hearing which 48% were unilateral. Of 1829 consecu- loss in a large school district of approxi- tive patients studied by Brookhouser et al, mately 54,000 students, with a second part of 690 (37.7%) had asymmetrical hearing loss. the study looking at academic performance. Of those 690 cases, 391 (56.7%) were described The prevalence of unilateral sensorineural as having isolated unilateral sensorineural hearing loss was approximately 2 students hearing loss. When 67 of these 391 cases per 1000. In 106 children, there were slightly were deleted from the study (due to various more males than females and almost twice as factors, such as conductive component), the many children with hearing loss in the right authors reported on the results of 324 chil- ear as the left ear. Almost three fourths of the dren; 62% were males and 38% were fe- hearing losses were sensorineural (N = 78). males. The left ear was affected in 52% and Bess and Tharpe (1986) and Tharpe and Bess the right ear was affected in 48%. This find- 12843.C09.PGS 3/8/02 11:11 AM Page 255 CHAPTER 9 I FITTING STRATEGIES FOR UNILATERAL HEARING LOSS 255 ing was not statistically significant. The in- (acquired). Congenital unilateral hearing vestigators felt their statistics were consis- loss can be genetic (dominant, recessive, or tent with previous investigators’ prepon- sex-linked) or nongenetic [cytomegalovirus derance of males over females. However, (CMV), low birth weight, syphilis, mumps, previous findings of greater right-sided ver- or anoxia]. In addition, unilateral hearing sus left-sided hearing losses were not sup- loss can be acquired at any age, and the re- ported by this study. sulting hearing loss may be progressive, Tieri et al (1988) observed 280 cases of uni- fluctuating, or sudden. lateral sensorineural hearing loss from 1979 to Several investigators have examined the 1986. The age range was 8 months to 12 years, etiology of unilateral hearing loss in chil- with a mean age at diagnosis of 7.6 years; 62% dren. In each investigation, the cause of the were males and 38% females. They felt these unilateral hearing loss was unknown (idio- findings were in agreement with those of pathic) in the majority of cases. Kinney Tarkkanen and Aho (1966) and Hallmo et al (1953) reported that of known causes in a se- (1986). The right ear was affected in 49.6% of ries of 310 children, meningitis, measles, and cases and the left ear in 50.3% cases. Degree of mumps were the most common etiologies. hearing loss ranged from mild to profound, Tieri et al (1988) examined 280 children be- with 79.3% falling in the latter range. In addi- tween 1979 and 1986 and found that the etio- tion, 250 audiograms revealed a flat configu- logic factor was known in only 23% of the ration. Tieri et al, noting that incidence is diffi- cases, and that of the known factors mumps cult to evaluate, cited the following statistics: was predominant. Everberg (1960) evalu- Everberg (1960), an incidence rate of 0.06%; ated 122 children with unilateral hearing Tarkkanen and Aho (1966), 0.09%; and Kinney loss and noted that congenital factors are (1953), 8.5%. Tieri et al noted that 24.7% of responsible for approximately 75% of the their children were diagnosed before the age cases, with heredity being the major causal of 6 years, as compared with the 47.5% under factor. 7 years noted by Everberg and the 7% before With the recent technologic advances in school age noted by Hallmo et al. They con- the treatment of neonates, additional risk cluded that school age diagnosis may be a factors for unilateral hearing loss have result of critical teacher observation, older emerged. These include persistent pulmo- children’s awareness of sensory skills, and nary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) exposure to a greater number of infectious (Hendricks-Munoz and Walton, 1988), hy- diseases. perbilirubinemia (Bergman et al, 1985), Although no clear-cut statistic is available intraventricular hemorrhage (Slack et al, regarding the incidence of unilateral sensori- 1986), and low birth weight (Clark and neural hearing loss in adults, perhaps the Conry (1979). Although these factors are findings summarized earlier in this chapter most typically associated with bilateral hear- may provide some insight. The incidence of ing loss, unilateral hearing loss has also been unilateral hearing loss is of such significance reported.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Head-Related Transfer Functions and Virtual Auditory Display
    Chapter 6 Head-Related Transfer Functions and Virtual Auditory Display Xiao-li Zhong and Bo-sun Xie Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/56907 1. Introduction 1.1. Sound source localization and HRTFs In real environments, wave radiated by sound sources propagates to a listener by direct and reflected paths. The scattering, diffraction and reflection effect of the listener’s anatomical structures (such as head, torso and pinnae) further disturb the sound field and thereby modify the sound pressures received by the two ears. Human hearing comprehen‐ sively utilizes the information encoded in binaural pressures and then forms various spatial auditory experiences, such as sound source localization and subjective perceptions of environmental reflections. Psychoacoustic experiments have proved that the following cues encoded in the binaural pressures contribute to directional localization [1]: 1. The interaural time difference (ITD), i.e., the arrival time difference between the sound waves at left and right ears, is the dominant directional localization cue for frequencies approximately below 1.5 kHz. 2. The interaural level difference (ILD), i.e., the pressure level difference between left and right ears caused by scattering and diffraction of head etc., is the important directional localization cue for frequencies approximately above 1.5 kHz. 3. The spectral cues encoded in the pressure spectra at ears, which are caused by the scattering, diffraction, and reflection of anatomical structures. In particular, the pinna- caused high-frequency spectral cue above 5 to 6 kHz is crucial to front-back disambiguity and vertical localization. © 2014 The Author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders Biomed Central
    BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders BioMed Central Case report Open Access Acute unilateral hearing loss as an unusual presentation of cholesteatoma Daniel Thio*1, Shahzada K Ahmed2 and Richard C Bickerton3 Address: 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, South Warwickshire General Hospitals NHS Trust Warwick CV34 5BW UK, 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology, South Warwickshire General Hospitals NHS Trust Warwick CV34 5BW UK and 3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, South Warwickshire General Hospitals NHS Trust Warwick CV34 5BW UK Email: Daniel Thio* - [email protected]; Shahzada K Ahmed - [email protected]; Richard C Bickerton - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 18 September 2005 Received: 10 July 2005 Accepted: 18 September 2005 BMC Ear, Nose and Throat Disorders 2005, 5:9 doi:10.1186/1472-6815-5-9 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6815/5/9 © 2005 Thio et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Cholesteatomas are epithelial cysts that contain desquamated keratin. Patients commonly present with progressive hearing loss and a chronically discharging ear. We report an unusual presentation of the disease with an acute hearing loss suffered immediately after prolonged use of a pneumatic drill. Case presentation: A 41 year old man with no previous history of ear problems presented with a sudden loss of hearing in his right ear immediately following the prolonged use of a pneumatic drill on concrete.
    [Show full text]
  • Signal Processing in High-End Hearing Aids: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Trends
    EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing 2005:18, 2915–2929 c 2005 V. Hamacher et al. Signal Processing in High-End Hearing Aids: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Trends V. Hamacher, J. Chalupper, J. Eggers, E. Fischer, U. Kornagel, H. Puder, and U. Rass Siemens Audiological Engineering Group, Gebbertstrasse 125, 91058 Erlangen, Germany Emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], eghart.fi[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Received 30 April 2004; Revised 18 September 2004 The development of hearing aids incorporates two aspects, namely, the audiological and the technical point of view. The former focuses on items like the recruitment phenomenon, the speech intelligibility of hearing-impaired persons, or just on the question of hearing comfort. Concerning these subjects, different algorithms intending to improve the hearing ability are presented in this paper. These are automatic gain controls, directional microphones, and noise reduction algorithms. Besides the audiological point of view, there are several purely technical problems which have to be solved. An important one is the acoustic feedback. Another instance is the proper automatic control of all hearing aid components by means of a classification unit. In addition to an overview of state-of-the-art algorithms, this paper focuses on future trends. Keywords and phrases: digital hearing aid, directional microphone, noise reduction, acoustic feedback, classification, compres- sion. 1. INTRODUCTION being close to each other. Details regarding this problem and possible solutions are discussed in Section 5. Note that Driven by the continuous progress in the semiconductor feedback suppression can be applied at different stages of technology, today’s high-end digital hearing aids offer pow- the signal flow dependent on the chosen strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Bimodal Hearing Or Bilateral Cochlear Implants: a Review of the Research Literature
    Bimodal Hearing or Bilateral Cochlear Implants: A Review of the Research Literature Carol A. Sammeth, Ph.D.,1,2 Sean M. Bundy,1 and Douglas A. Miller, M.S.E.E.3 ABSTRACT Over the past 10 years, there have been an increasing number of patients fitted with either bimodal hearing devices (unilateral cochlear implant [CI], and hearing aid on the other ear) or bilateral cochlear implants. Concurrently, there has been an increasing interest in and number of publications on these topics. This article reviews the now fairly voluminous research literature on bimodal hearing and bilateral cochlear implantation in both children and adults. The emphasis of this review is on more recent clinical studies that represent current technology and that evaluated speech recognition in quiet and noise, localization ability, and perceived benefit. A vast majority of bilaterally deaf subjects in these studies showed benefit in one or more areas from bilateral CIs compared with listening with only a unilateral CI. For patients who have sufficient residual low-frequency hearing sensitivity for the provision of amplification in the nonimplanted ear, bimodal hearing appears to provide a good nonsurgical alternative to bilateral CIs or to unilateral listening for many patients. KEYWORDS: Bimodal hearing, bimodal devices, bilateral cochlear Downloaded by: SASLHA. Copyrighted material. implants, binaural hearing Learning Outcomes: As a result of this activity, the participant will be able to (1) compare possible benefits of bimodal hearing versus bilateral cochlear implantation based on current research, and (2) identify when to consider fitting of bimodal hearing devices or bilateral cochlear implants. Multichannel cochlear implants (CIs) tion for persons with hearing loss that is too have proven to be a highly successful interven- severe for good performance with conventional 1Cochlear Americas, Centennial, Colorado; 2Division of Centennial, CO 80111 (e-mail: [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Bedside Neuro-Otological Examination and Interpretation of Commonly
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.2004.054478 on 24 November 2004. Downloaded from BEDSIDE NEURO-OTOLOGICAL EXAMINATION AND INTERPRETATION iv32 OF COMMONLY USED INVESTIGATIONS RDavies J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75(Suppl IV):iv32–iv44. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.054478 he assessment of the patient with a neuro-otological problem is not a complex task if approached in a logical manner. It is best addressed by taking a comprehensive history, by a Tphysical examination that is directed towards detecting abnormalities of eye movements and abnormalities of gait, and also towards identifying any associated otological or neurological problems. This examination needs to be mindful of the factors that can compromise the value of the signs elicited, and the range of investigative techniques available. The majority of patients that present with neuro-otological symptoms do not have a space occupying lesion and the over reliance on imaging techniques is likely to miss more common conditions, such as benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), or the failure to compensate following an acute unilateral labyrinthine event. The role of the neuro-otologist is to identify the site of the lesion, gather information that may lead to an aetiological diagnosis, and from there, to formulate a management plan. c BACKGROUND Balance is maintained through the integration at the brainstem level of information from the vestibular end organs, and the visual and proprioceptive sensory modalities. This processing takes place in the vestibular nuclei, with modulating influences from higher centres including the cerebellum, the extrapyramidal system, the cerebral cortex, and the contiguous reticular formation (fig 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Cochlear Implants in Unilateral Hearing Loss for Tinnitus Suppression
    Central Annals of Otolaryngology and Rhinology Review Article *Corresponding author Mohamed Salah Elgandy, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cochlear Implants in Unilateral Iowa hospital and clinics, 200 Hawkins drive, Iowa, Iowa City 52242.PFP 21167, USA, Tel; +1(319)519-3862; Email; Hearing Loss for Tinnitus Submitted: 19 January 2019 Accepted: 06 February 2019 Suppression Published: 08 February 2019 ISSN: 2379-948X 1,2 2,3 Mohamed Salah Elgandy *and Richard S. Tyler Copyright 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Zagazig University, Egypt © 2019 Elgandy et al. 2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, USA 3Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, USA OPEN ACCESS Keywords Abstract • Unilateral hearing loss Tinnitus is a pervasive symptom that can affect many people with hearing loss. • Tinnitus It is found that its incidence is increasing due to accompanying occupational and • Electrical stimulation environmental noise. Even, there is no standard treatment is present up till now, but • Cochlear implants cochlear implants (CIs) positive effects are well proven and documented. This article provides an overview of many publicly available reports about cochlear implants and tinnitus, with review of several articles demonstrating the benefit of cochlear implants for unilateral hearing loss and tinnitus. We believe that this approach will help many, and should be considered as standard practice and reimbursed. INTRODUCTION An increase in rate. Unilateral hearing loss affecting approximately18.1 million • Decrease in rate persons in the United States [1]. Patients with unilateral deafness • Periodic activity frequently also experience tinnitus, which can have a profound • Synchronous activity cross neurons has been associated with an increased incidence of depression, impact on an individual’s quality of life.
    [Show full text]
  • 32 3. UNADDRESSED HEARING PROBLEMS This Section Contains
    3. UNADDRESSED HEARING PROBLEMS This section contains: a description of the types of hearing problems that affect children; the prevalence of hearing problems; unmet needs for hearing screening, diagnosis and treatment; and evidence on the learning consequences of unaddressed hearing problems. Definitions Normal hearing was defined in 1965 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology and Otolaryngology (AAOO) as any hearing loss up to 26 dB. This level of hearing loss is the point at which an individual begins to find it difficult to understand typical speech in a quiet environment. The AAOO guidelines around normal hearing have not changed since this cutoff was established and are supported by the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Audiology. Hearing deficits are categorized and defined in various ways, and there is variation in defining levels of hearing loss across countries, states, and health care providers. There are no widely agreed upon definitions for all types and levels of hearing loss. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA) categorizes and defines hearing loss primarily by type, degree, and configuration.103 Type of Hearing Loss (as defined by ASHA) ● Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is the most common type of permanent hearing loss and “happens when there is damage to the inner ear (cochlea) or to the nerve pathways from the inner ear to the brain.” Audible speech may be unclear or sound muffled. This type of hearing loss can usually not be corrected with medical treatment or surgery. SNHL can be caused by: ○ Drugs that are toxic to hearing ○ Hearing loss that runs in the family (genetic or hereditary) ○ Head trauma ○ Malformation of the inner ear ○ Exposure to loud noise ● Conductive hearing loss “occurs when sound is not sent easily through the outer ear canal to the eardrum and the tiny bones (ossicles) of the middle ear.” Sounds will seem softer and less easy to hear.
    [Show full text]
  • Audio Engineering Society Convention Paper Presented at the 113Th Convention 2002 October 5–8 Los Angeles, CA, USA
    ALGAZI ET AL. HAT MODELS FOR SYNTHESIS Audio Engineering Society Convention Paper Presented at the 113th Convention 2002 October 5{8 Los Angeles, CA, USA This convention paper has been reproduced from the author's advance manuscript, without editing, corrections, or consideration by the Review Board. The AES takes no responsibility for the contents. Additional papers may be obtained by sending request and remittance to Audio Engineering Society, 60 East 42nd Street, New York, New York 10165-2520, USA; also see www.aes.org. All rights reserved. Reproduction of this paper, or any portion thereof, is not permitted without direct permission from the Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. THE USE OF HEAD-AND-TORSO MODELS FOR IMPROVED SPATIAL SOUND SYNTHESIS V. Ralph Algazi1, Richard O. Duda1, and Dennis M. Thompson1 1CIPIC Interface Laboratory, University of California, Davis CA, 95616-8553, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Richard O. Duda ([email protected]) ABSTRACT This paper concerns the use of a simple head-and-torso model to correct de¯ciencies in the low-frequency behavior of experimentally measured head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). This so-called \snowman" model consists of a spherical head located above a spherical torso. In addition to providing improved low- frequency response for music reproduction, the model provides the major low-frequency localization cues, including cues for low-elevation as well as high-elevation sources. The model HRTF and the measured HRTF can be easily combined by using the phase response of the model at all frequencies and by \cross-fading" between the dB magnitude responses of the model and the measurements.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unilateral Cochlear Implant for Tinnitus
    REVIEW PAPER DOI: 10.5935/0946-5448.20180022 International Tinnitus Journal. 2018;22(2):128-132. A Unilateral Cochlear Implant for Tinnitus Mohamed Salah Elgandy1 Richard Tyler2,3 Camille Dunn2 Marlan Hansen2 Bruce Gantz2 Abstract In recent years a growing number of Patients with unilateral hearing loss have been undergoing cochlear implantation. We provide an overview of the efficacy of cochlear implants (CIs) to rehabilitate patients with unilateral deafness with regards to sound localization, speech recognition, and tinnitus. Although CI is not yet an FDA-approved treatment for unilateral deafness, several recent studies show improvements in speech understanding, sound localization, and tinnitus. Based on encouraging results and the unique ability to restore binaural sound processing, the benefits to many as an aid to their tinnitus, we argue that CIs should be offered as a treatment for unilateral deafness. Keywords: hearing loss, tinnitus, electrical stimulation, cochlear implants. 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Zagazig University, Egypt 2Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA 3Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA Send correspondence to: Mohamed Salah Elgandy Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Zagazig University, Egypt. E-mail: [email protected] Paper submitted to the ITJ-EM (Editorial Manager System) on August 30, 2018; and accepted on September 10, 2018. International Tinnitus Journal, Vol. 22, No 2 (2018) 128 www.tinnitusjournal.com INTRODUCTION disturbances. It is important to note that the therapy in these situations is for depression and anxiety, not tinnitus. Unilateral hearing loss implies a profound sensori- neural hearing loss in one ear and no greater than a mild As with any bothersome, common disorder that lacks hearing loss in the opposite ear.
    [Show full text]
  • A Giant Cholesteatoma of the Mastoid Extending Into the Foramen
    Neurology International 2018; volume 10:7625 A giant cholesteatoma of the mastoid extending into Introduction Correspondence: Yuekang Zhang, Department of Neurosurgery, Post Graduate Training the foramen magnum: Cholesteatomas are benign, slowly pro- Centre, West China Hospital, Sichuan gressive lesions that are usually found in the University; 37 Guo Xue Xiang Road, A case report and review 1-5 temporal bone. They are epidermoid Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China. of literature cysts of embryologic origin that result in Tel.: +86.18980601975 - Fax: +86.02885422490. progressive desquamation and trapping of E-mail: [email protected] Seidu A. Richard,1-3 Li Qiang,1 squamous epithelium behind an intact tym- panic membrane.6 They can be congenital Key words: Cholesteatoma, Case report, Zhi Gang Lan,1 Yuekang Zhang,1 or acquired.1,4,5 They can be classified into Dizziness, Epidermoid Cyst, Hearing loss, Chao You1 supralabyrinthine, infralabyrinthine, mas- Tinnitus. 1Department of Neurosurgery, West sive labyrinthine, infralabyrinthine-apical, Contributions: SAR conceived the project and and apical.1,4 They have the penchant for China Hospital, Sichuan University, designed the study; SAR, LQ and ZQL col- 2 China; Department of Immunology, the petrous apex, skull base, and internal lected patient’s data; YZ and CY provided Jiangsu University, China; 3Department auditory canal. Also, these lesions may technical assistance in the study; SAR pre- of Surgery, Volta Regional Hospital, Ho, infiltrate other vital soft tissue structures pared the illustration, analyzed data and wrote such as the sigmoid sinus, jugular vein and Ghana the paper. artery, and the cerebellopontine angle.1,4,5 Symptoms associated with cholesteatomas Conflict of interest: the authors declare no includes vertigo, tinnitus, otorrhea, and potential conflict of interest.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Dissertation Title: the Pattern of Hearing Loss As Seen at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City
    RESEARCH DISSERTATION TITLE: THE PATTERN OF HEARING LOSS AS SEEN AT THE UNIVERSITY OF BENIN TEACHING HOSPITAL, BENIN CITY. BY DR. PAUL R O C ADOBAMEN ADDRESS: ENT UNIT, DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY, UBTH, BENIN CITY. A RESEARCH DISSERTATION, SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE AWARD OF FMCORL OF THE NATIONAL POST GRADUATE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF NIGERIA. MAY 2006. 1 CANDIDATE’S DECLARATION I, Dr. Adobamen P R O C hereby declare that: “The pattern of hearing loss as seen at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital, Benin City”; - Is an original prospective work done by me as the sole author and assistance received is duly acknowledged. - This work has not been previously submitted either in part or in full to any other College for a Fellowship nor has it been submitted elsewhere for publication. SIGNATURE------------------------ DATE------------------------------- 2 CERTIFICATION This study titled: “The pattern of hearing loss as seen at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital (UBTH), Benin City” was done by Dr. Adobamen P R O C under our supervision. We also supervised the writing of this dissertation. 1. NAME: Prof. F O Ogisi. FRCS, FICS, FWACS, FMCORL, DLO. STATUS: CONSULTANT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIST, HEAD AND NECK SURGEON, PROFESSOR. ADDRESS: DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY, U. B. T. H., BENIN CITY, NIGERIA. SIGNATURE:------------------------------------------------------ DATE:------------------------------------------------------------ 2. NAME: PROF B C EZEANOLUE. FMCORL, FWACS, FICS STATUS: CONSULTANT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIST, HEAD AND NECK SURGEON, ASSOCIATE. PROFESSOR. ADDRESS: DEPARTMENT OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, U.N.T.H., ENUGU, NIGERIA. SIGNATURE:------------------------------------------------------ DATE:------------------------------------------------------------ 3 DEDICATION This book is dedicated to the bride of Jesus Christ; for their gallant stand for the Word of God.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Loss and Auditory Disorders: Outside the Clinic
    Hollea Ryan, Au.D., Ph.D., CCC-A Audiology Program Director, Samford University Bethany Wenger, Au.D., CCC-A Pediatric Audiologist, Vanderbilt University Disclaimers • Hollea Ryan is employed by Samford University and receives financial compensation for her work. No conflict of interest exists for this presentation. • Bethany Wenger is employed by Vanderbilt University Medical Center and receives financial compensation for her work. She has previously worked as a consultant for a hearing protection device company and was financially compensated. No conflict of interest exists for this presentation. Hearing Loss and Auditory Disorders:Hearing Loss Outside and Auditorythe Clinic Disorders: Outside the Clinic AGENDA • Unilateral Hearing Loss • Minimal (Bilateral) Hearing Loss • Auditory Disorders • Non-clinical Settings • Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Learning Objectives At the completion of this presentation, the participant will be able to: 1) Detail current research findings regarding children with minimal hearing loss and/or noise-induced hearing loss. 2) Identify non-academic settings in which children with hearing loss struggle. 3) Summarize various treatment options for children with hearing loss that improve communication, academic performance, and/or quality of life. What the Literature is Indicating about Minimal/Unilateral Hearing Loss Hearing Care Practices Before and After UNHS (Fitzpatrick, Whittingham, & Durieux-Smith, 2013; Fitzpatrick, Durieux-Smith, & Whittingham, 2010) • Retrospectively evaluated 20 years of history related
    [Show full text]