DOCSLIB.ORG

Fowl Deeds the Impact of Chicken Production and Consumption on People and the Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

sustain the alliance for better food and farming Fowl deeds The impact of chicken production and consumption on people and the environment Food Facts No9 A SUSTAIN PUBLICATION What are ‘Food Facts’? There is growing concern about the quality of the food are not comprehensive dossiers, they are “sign-posting” we eat and drink - a recent poll1 showed that a majority documents, indicating the current scope of the debate of people now believe that food safety is deteriorating. and offering sources of further information. Many People are also worried about the environment and organisations in the Sustain membership (see inside back farming practices, and how our food production and cover) provide some of the best sources of such distribution systems may be contributing to problems information, and the Food Facts series is guided by a such as transport pollution, global warming and the loss working party (listed below) to whom we are indebted. of wildlife. The buoyant market for healthier foods, and However, the views expressed here do not necessarily exponentially growing sales for organically produced represent those of every member of the working party, foods show that many of us are prepared to make or of the Sustain membership as a whole. We are grateful positive choices to help tackle these problems. But our to the following organisations for supporting the ability to do so depends, among other things, on having production of the Food Facts series: Government’s the facts. This report is the ninth in a planned series of Environmental Action Fund, the Esmée Fairbairn twelve, all of which aim to provide information about the Charitable Trust, the Cobb Charity, the Cecil Pilkington positive and negative effects of food production methods Charitable Trust and the Chapman Charitable Trust. For on our environment and society. To date the topics in the more information about Food Facts please contact us at series have included: milk, beef, apples, pears, soya, the address on the back cover, or see the Sustain website carrots, beer, lettuce and chicken meat. Sustain Food Facts at www.sustainweb.org Working party David Buffin (Pesticides Trust), Kathy Cowbrough (Community Nutrition Group), Chris Emerson (Agri-Environment Consultant), Vicki Hird (Sustain: The alliance for better food and farming), Tim Lobstein (Food Commission), Clive Peckam (East Anglia Food Link), Matthew Rayment (Royal Society for the Protection of Birds), Judy Steele (Henry Doubleday Research Association). Acknowledgements This publication would not have been possible without the help and advice of the Working Party above and: Phillip Andrews (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food), Vernon Barber (National Farmers Union), Laure Barrington (Soil Association), Alison Bone (National Farmers Union), Peter Bradnock (British Poultry Meat Federation), Peter Crofts (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food), Alisdair Cox (Grampian Country Foods Group), Alison Craig (Pesticides Trust), Gavin Dupee (Sustain: The alliance for better food and farming), Julie Fletcher (Photographs), Karen Frances (Sustain: The alliance for better food and farming), Richard Guy (Real Meat Company), Brigit Henderson (Landworker), Jack Kay (Veterinary Medicines Directorate), Jeanette Longfield (Sustain: The alliance for better food and farming), Peter Mundy (Soil Association), Lidia Peroni (Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food), Peter Rodman (National Farmers Union), Jill Smith (Health and Safety Executive), and Professor John Webster (Bristol University). Special thanks to Louise Stayte. Design: Ian Tokelove. Photographs copyright: Compassion in World Farming & Sustain: The alliance for better food and farming Supported by Published by Sustain: The alliance for better food and farming - 1999 Fowl deeds The impact of chicken production and consumption on people and the environment by Alexis Vaughan sustain the alliance for better food and farming Published by Sustain: The alliance for better food and farming - 1999 Contents Foreword by Professor John Webster ....................................................................vi Summary...................................................................................................................vii Introduction..............................................................................................................1 Production and consumption..................................................................................2 Broiler selection........................................................................................................3 The 43 day life of a chicken....................................................................................4 The broiler house.....................................................................................................4 Transport to the abattoir ..........................................................................................6 Processing chickens ..................................................................................................7 What’s in broiler feed? ............................................................................................11 Soya........................................................................................................................11 Meat and bone-meal ...............................................................................................12 Antibiotics ...............................................................................................................12 Probiotics ................................................................................................................14 Other feed additives ................................................................................................14 Chicken chain............................................................................................................16-17 Broilers and the environment.................................................................................18 Broiler litter - where does it go? ...............................................................................18 Cleaning and disinfecting .........................................................................................18 Dirty air...................................................................................................................19 Is it safe to eat chicken meat?................................................................................21 The big three contaminants......................................................................................21 Fatty food? ..............................................................................................................22 Supermarkets ...........................................................................................................23 Chickens fly further..................................................................................................24 Brazil.......................................................................................................................24 Thailand..................................................................................................................25 Comparison of broiler systems ...............................................................................28 What are the alternatives? .....................................................................................30 Free range?..............................................................................................................30 What should the consumer buy? ..............................................................................30 Broiler legislation.....................................................................................................30 Recommendations....................................................................................................31 Contacts.....................................................................................................................32 References.................................................................................................................34 iv Published by Sustain: The alliance for better food and farming - 1999 iv Foreword by Professor John Webster Once upon a time, not such a very long time ago, we knew how our food was produced. Even if we were not directly involved, we saw the crops growing in the fields, we saw the animals being fed, milked, killed and butchered. We may not have thought very deeply about, for example, the health, environmental and animal welfare implications of what we saw but, at least, we had some facts to go on when forming judgements about what to eat. The intensification of agriculture has undoubtedly brought cheaper food to more people. However, by destroying the direct, day-to- day association between producer and consumer it has also created new problems. It is easier for producers to disguise practices which would deter consumers from buying their products. It is also easier to hoodwink the consumer with false propaganda in support of any extreme opinion or vested interest. Nowhere are these problems more acute than in that most intensive and hidden form of ‘factory farming’, the broiler chicken industry. If we are to make sound and honourable decisions about the food we eat, we need food facts. It is the business of Sustain to do just that. This report on the industry that produces broiler chickens has been well researched; it is honest
Recommended publications
  • Farmer Willingness to Supply Poultry Litter for Energy Conversion and to Invest in an Energy Conversion Cooperative

    Farmer Willingness to Supply Poultry Litter for Energy Conversion and to Invest in an Energy Conversion Cooperative

    Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 42,1(February 2010):105–119 Ó 2010 Southern Agricultural Economics Association Farmer Willingness to Supply Poultry Litter for Energy Conversion and to Invest in an Energy Conversion Cooperative Kimberly L. Jensen, Roland K. Roberts, Ernie Bazen, R. Jamey Menard, and Burton C. English* Conversion of poultry litter to energy can serve as a renewable energy source and provide an alternative to land application in areas where poultry production is intensive. Economies of size may limit a farmer’s ability to economically use on-farm conversion. Capital costs can be spread across several poultry farmers to convert poultry litter to energy in a centralized fa- cility. This research determined influences on the amount of litter poultry producers will to sell to a centralized conversion facility, on their willingness to invest in a conversion co- operative, and on the prices for litter required to divert litter from current uses. Key Words: poultry litter, supply, renewable energy JEL Classifications: Q12, Q13 Increases in energy costs, with energy costs considered renewable energy. The U.S. De- comprising over half of cash expenses for partment of Energy (DOE) includes bioenergy, poultry producers (Cunningham, 2008), cou- or energy from biomass, as a source of re- pled with a desire for sustainable production newable energy and includes animal wastes in practices, highlight the need to investigate the its definition of biomass that can be used to use of poultry litter as a potential energy feed- generate renewable energy (DOE, 2009). Sec- stock. Poultry litter, the bedding and waste ma- ond, conversion of litter to electricity can pro- terials removed from poultry houses, can serve vide an alternative use for the litter in areas as an energy feedstock for heating and elec- where poultry production is intensive and litter tricity generation either in on-farm systems or supplies exceed the fertilizer needs on nearby in centralized litter-to-energy conversion fa- farmlands.
  • The Greening of Louisiana's Economy: the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing

    The Greening of Louisiana's Economy: the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing

    Increasing Employment in Mississippi The Greening of Mississippi’s Economy: the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Sector August 2011 greenjobs.mdes.ms.gov In 2009, Mississippi and Louisiana partnered to research economic development opportunities and workforce needs associated with the region’s green economy. Through a $2.3 million grant from the U.S. Department of Labor, a consortium of the Mississippi Department of Employment Security, Mississippi State University, Louisiana Workforce Commission, and Louisiana State University conducted an extensive study of economic activity that is beneficial to the environment. This and other research products were developed as part of that effort. “This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded by the U.S. Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration. The solution was created by the grantee and does not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Labor. The Department of Labor makes no guarantees, warranties, or assurances of any kind, express or implied, with respect to such information, including any information on linked sites and including, but not limited to, accuracy of the information or its completeness, timeliness, usefulness, adequacy, continued availability, or ownership. This solution is copyrighted by the institution that created it. Internal use by an organization and/or personal use by an individual for non-commercial purposes is permissible. All other uses require the prior authorization of the copyright owner.” Equal Opportunity Employer/Program Auxiliary aids and services available upon request to individuals with disabilities: TTY 800-582-2233 i Table of Contents Description of Sector ....................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction to the Green Component of the Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Sector ...
  • A STUDYGUIDE by Robert Lewis

    A STUDYGUIDE by Robert Lewis

    A STUDYGUIDE BY ROBERT LEWIS www.metromagazine.com.au www.theeducationshop.com.au McLibel (Franny Armstrong, 2005) is an 85-minute documentary film about the attempt by McDonald’s to stop the distribution of a pamphlet that they claimed defamed them. wo of the distributors of the settlement negotiations. Even spies. BEFORE WATCHING THE pamphlet, London Greenpeace FILM Tmembers Helen Steel and Dave Seven years later, in February 2005, Morris, defended themselves in what the marathon legal battle finally McLibel is about the court case turned out to be Britain’s longest-ever concluded at the European Court of that was brought by McDonald’s in civil trial. Human Rights. And the result took Britain to stop the distribution of the everyone by surprise – especially the pamphlet ‘What’s wrong with McDon- McLibel is the story of two ordinary British Government. ald’s?’. The pamphlet made many people who humiliated McDonald’s in accusations against McDonald’s. the biggest corporate PR disaster in McLibel is not just about hamburgers. history. McDonald’s loved using the It is about the importance of freedom To understand what the case was UK libel laws to suppress criticism. of speech now that multinational about you need to study the pamphlet. Major media organizations like the corporations are more powerful than BBC and The Guardian crumbled and countries. It is a long pamphlet, so to make the apologized. task easier it has been divided into Filmed over ten years by no-budget sub-sections in Table 1 on (page 3). But then they sued gardener Helen Director Franny Armstrong, McLibel The whole class should look at the Steel and postman Dave Morris.
  • ANIMAL AGRICULTURE: Waste Management Practices GAO/RCED-99-205

    ANIMAL AGRICULTURE: Waste Management Practices GAO/RCED-99-205

    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Honorable Tom Harkin, GAO Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry, U.S. Senate July 1999 ANIMAL AGRICULTURE Waste Management Practices GAO/RCED-99-205 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-282871 July 26, 1999 The Honorable Tom Harkin Ranking Minority Member Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry United States Senate Dear Senator Harkin: The production of livestock and poultry animals, also known as animal agriculture, is important to the economic well-being of the nation, producing $98.8 billion per year in farm revenue. This production also contributes to the viability of many rural communities and the sustainability of an adequate food supply for the American public. However, concern over pollution resulting from intensive livestock and poultry production—in which large numbers of animals are held in confined production facilities—has increased in recent years. Nationwide, about 130 times more animal waste1 is produced than human waste—roughly 5 tons for every U.S. citizen—and some operations with hundreds of thousands of animals produce as much waste as a town or a city.2 These large volumes of waste threaten surface water and groundwater quality in the event of waste spills, leakage from waste storage facilities, and runoff from fields on which an excessive amount of waste has been applied as fertilizer. Furthermore, as animal production is increasingly concentrated in larger operations and in certain regions of the country, commonly used animal waste management practices may no longer be adequate for preventing water pollution.
  • Protecting Activists from Abusive Litigation: Slapps in the Global

    Protecting Activists from Abusive Litigation: Slapps in the Global

    PROTECTING ACTIVISTS FROM ABUSIVE LITIGATION SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH AND HOW TO RESPOND SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH Features and Policy Responses Author: Nikhil Dutta, Global Programs Legal Advisor, ICNL, [email protected]. Our thanks go to the following colleagues and partners for valuable discussions and input on this report: Abby Henderson; Charlie Holt; Christen Dobson; Ginna Anderson; Golda Benjamin; Lady Nancy Zuluaga Jaramillo; Zamira Djabarova; the Cambodian Center for Human Rights; iProbono; and SEEDS for Legal Initiatives. Published in July 2020 by the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL NORTH 2 III. SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH 4 A. Instances of Reported SLAPPs in the South 4 i. Thailand 5 ii. India 7 iii. Philippines 10 iv. South Africa 12 v. Other Instances of Reported SLAPPS in the South 13 B. Features of Reported SLAPPs in the South 15 IV. POLICY RESPONSES TO SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL NORTH 19 A. Enacting Protections for Public Participation 19 B. Creating Expedited Dismissal Procedures for SLAPPs 20 C. Endowing Courts with Supplemental Authorities to Manage SLAPPs 23 D. Permitting Recovery of Costs by SLAPP Targets 24 E. Authorizing Government Intervention in SLAPPs 25 F. Establishing Public Funds to Support SLAPP Defense 25 G. Imposing Compensatory and Punitive Damages on SLAPP Filers 25 H. Levying Penalties on SLAPP Filers 26 I. Reforming SLAPP Causes of Action 27 V. POLICY RESPONSES TO SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH 27 A. Thailand 28 B. Philippines 30 C. Indonesia 33 VI. DEVISING FUTURE RESPONSES TO SLAPPS IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH 33 REFERENCES 37 I.
  • The Following Report Is No Longer Current, and Is to Be Used for Historical Purposes Only

    The Following Report Is No Longer Current, and Is to Be Used for Historical Purposes Only

    The following report is no longer current, and is to be used for historical purposes only. CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES: The Enforcement of Humane Slaughter Laws in the United States Researched and written by DENA JONES for the Animal Welfare Institute 2 CRIMES WITHOUT CONSEQUENCES: The Enforcement of Humane Slaughter Laws in the United States Researched and written by Dena Jones May 2008 Animal Welfare Institute Crimes Without Consequences: The Enforcement of Humane Slaughter Laws in the United States Researched and written by Dena Jones Animal Welfare Institute P.O. Box 3650 Washington, DC 20027 www.awionline.org Copyright © 2008 by the Animal Welfare Institute Printed in the United States of America ISBN 0-938414-94-1 LCCN 2008925385 i CONTENTS Executive Summary .................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ............................................................................................. 5 1.1 About the author........................................................................ 6 1.2 About the Animal Welfare Institute ........................................... 6 1.3 Acknowledgements ................................................................... 6 2. Overview of Food Animal Slaughter in the United States ...................... 7 2.1 Animals Slaughtered ................................................................. 7 2.2 Types of Slaughter Plants .......................................................... 12 2.3 Number of Plants .....................................................................
  • Legal Research Paper Series

    Legal Research Paper Series

    Legal Research Paper Series NON HUMAN ANIMALS AND THE LAW: A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ANIMAL LAW RESOURCES AT THE STANFORD LAW LIBRARY By Rita K. Lomio and J. Paul Lomio Research Paper No. 6 October 2005 Robert Crown Law Library Crown Quadrangle Stanford, California 94305-8612 NON HUMAN ANIMALS AND THE LAW: A BIBLIOGRPAHY OF ANIMAL LAW RESOURCES AT THE STANFORD LAW LIBRARY I. Books II. Reports III. Law Review Articles IV. Newspaper Articles (including legal newspapers) V. Sound Recordings and Films VI. Web Resources I. Books RESEARCH GUIDES AND BIBLIOGRAPHIES Hoffman, Piper, and the Harvard Student Animal Legal Defense Fund The Guide to Animal Law Resources Hollis, New Hampshire: Puritan Press, 1999 Reference KF 3841 G85 “As law students, we have found that although more resources are available and more people are involved that the case just a few years ago, locating the resource or the person we need in a particular situation remains difficult. The Guide to Animal Law Resources represents our attempt to collect in one place some of the resources a legal professional, law professor or law student might want and have a hard time finding.” Guide includes citations to organizations and internships, animal law court cases, a bibliography, law schools where animal law courses are taught, Internet resources, conferences and lawyers devoted to the cause. The International Institute for Animal Law A Bibliography of Animal Law Resources Chicago, Illinois: The International Institute for Animal Law, 2001 KF 3841 A1 B53 Kistler, John M. Animal Rights: A Subject Guide, Bibliography, and Internet Companion Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 2000 HV 4708 K57 Bibliography divided into six subject areas: Animal Rights: General Works, Animal Natures, Fatal Uses of Animals, Nonfatal Uses of Animals, Animal Populations, and Animal Speculations.
  • Most Appropriate Measures for Reducing Ammonia Emissions in Latvia’S Pig and Poultry Housing

    Most Appropriate Measures for Reducing Ammonia Emissions in Latvia’S Pig and Poultry Housing

    Agronomy Research 17(3), 797–805, 2019 https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.19.047 Most appropriate measures for reducing ammonia emissions in Latvia’s pig and poultry housing J. Priekulis1, L. Melece2,* and A. Laurs1 1Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Agriculture Mashinery J.Čakstes bulv.6, LV-3001 Jelgava, Latvia 2Institute of Agricultural Resources and Economics, Department of Economics, Struktoru str. 14, LV-1039, Riga, Latvia *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract. New goals of ammonia emissions reduction for each of EU Member State, including Latvia, were approved by the EU Directive 2016/2284/EU ‘on the reduction of national emissions of certain atmospheric pollutants’. Agriculture sector, particularly livestock farming, is the main source of these emissions. Besides, the implementation of modern or intensive animal rearing/breeding technologies causes the increase of emissions in Latvia. Therefore, more effective ammonia abatement measures or techniques should be chosen for implementation in Latvia to reach the objectives. The description and benefits of such measures are provided in the guidelines and recommendations developed and approved by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and the European Commission. However, all of these recommendations are not applicable in Latvia. Therefore, the aim of research was to find most appropriate ammonia emissions abatement measures for pig and poultry farming in Latvia. The study was focused on the intensive pig and poultry farming, particularly animal housing. Evaluation or assessment of most appropriate ammonia emissions’ reduction measures was conducted using an expert method. The results of the study indicate that it is possible to ensure reduction of ammonia emissions by comparatively simple and less expensive options that could be more or less easy implemented (e.g.
  • A Guide to Poultry Litter Use in Louisiana Rice Production

    A Guide to Poultry Litter Use in Louisiana Rice Production

    A Guide to Poultry Litter Use in Louisiana Rice Production A loss of production on recently precision-leveled rice bedding materials used in commercial broiler houses include fields in a rice-crawfish-rice rotation has become a common wood shavings, rice hulls and sawdust. As the bedding mate- occurrence in commercial Louisiana rice production. This is rial is used it forms a hard layer on the surface often referred especially true on mechanically altered silt loam soils of the to as a cake. This cake can be removed (decaked) after one coastal plains found in southwest Louisiana. flock has been grown or can be removed after several flocks The use of poultry litter on unproductive areas has in- have been grown, depending on the management practices creased productivity levels in many cases above those realized of the producer. Therefore, nutritive value of litter is not prior to precision-leveling. The use of litter in conjunction constant between sources. The nutrient content can vary with inorganic fertilizers also has been reported to improve considerably depending on the bedding material used, num- yields above those found when using inorganic fertilizers ber of flocks grown between decaking, feed source and feed alone. Research in organic fertilizers such as poultry litter in efficiency, bird type, management practices and whether the southwest Louisiana rice production has been neglected in litter has been composted or is fresh. This variability makes the past because transportation and application costs have it imperative that every delivered batch of litter be tested to traditionally exceeded the nutritional benefit of the poultry determine the nutrient and water content.
  • Feeding Broiler Litter to Beef Cattle

    Feeding Broiler Litter to Beef Cattle

    MP-1773 February, 1996 Feeding Broiler Litter to Beef Cattle G. W. Evers, L. W. Greene, J. B. Carey and D. S. Doctorian* Broiler production in Texas has expanded at er litter to beef cattle utilizing information an annual rate of 7 percent since 1986 with from other states and two surveys on broiler 371 million broilers produced in 1994. Broiler litter feeding in the eastern half of Texas. litter (mixture of poultry excreta, bedding material, wasted feed and feathers) is usually Feed Quality Broiler Litter removed from the poultry houses on an annual Not all broiler litter is suitable for livestock basis. Because of its high nutrient content, feed. It is estimated that only about 35 percent poultry litter is usually applied to agricultural of the broiler litter produced in Alabama is of land as fertilizer with an economic value of $20 sufficient quality to be fed to cattle (Ruffin and to $30/ton. Broiler litter has a higher value as McCaskey, 1993). The composition of broiler a feed for beef cattle. Cattle are ruminants and litter is quite variable due to the amount of soil can digest material high in cellulose, hemicellu- contamination, type of litter, number of batch- lose and fiber. Byproducts of many grain and es of birds reared on the litter, and poultry food processing industries (i.e. citrus pulp, house management (McCaskey, 1995). The sugar beet pulp, brewers grain, corn gluten, nutrient and mineral variability of broiler litter fish meal, cotton hulls, and rice bran) are fed fed in Texas during the 1993-94 winter is to cattle.
  • The Nitrogen Contained in Carbonized Poultry Litter Is Not Plant Available

    The Nitrogen Contained in Carbonized Poultry Litter Is Not Plant Available

    Open Agriculture. 2018; 3: 284–290 Research Article Christoph Steiner*, Keith Harris, Julia Gaskin, KC. Das The nitrogen contained in carbonized poultry litter is not plant available https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2018-0030 received February 7, 2018; accepted June 26, 2018 1 Introduction Abstract: Pyrolysis of biomass, reduces its volume, mass, There is growing concern about the large amounts of odour, and potential pathogens, while concentrating manure being generated by large animal feeding operations nutrients in the resulting biochar. However, the plant and the potential hazard for water eutrophication and air availability of nutrients in particular of nitrogen remains quality. In many cases there is insufficient land available largely unknown. Therefore, we investigated the nutrient for spreading the manure at agronomic rates and the availability of carbonized poultry litter. A nutrient poor increasing scale of animal feeding operations which has soil was either fertilized with poultry litter or poultry litter caused accumulation of excess nutrients. The poultry carbonized at 500°C at the rates of 1.5, 3 and 6 t/ha. These industry in the US produces 576,436 t of nitrogen (N) and organic amendments were compared with corresponding 276,932 t of phosphorus (P) representing an excess of rates of mineral fertilizers (NH4NO3, KCl, CaHPO4, MgSO4) in 483,646 and 252,493 t respectively (Gollehon et al. 2001). a pot experiment. After four successive harvests of ryegrass Thermochemical conversion (pyrolysis) might be (Lolium sp.) in a greenhouse we analyzed plant nutrient one option to process poultry litter for renewable energy uptake and nutrient concentrations in the soil.
  • Poultry Litter/Manure Management Practices in Intensively Managed Poultry Farms in Portharcourt

    Poultry Litter/Manure Management Practices in Intensively Managed Poultry Farms in Portharcourt

    IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS) e-ISSN: 2319-2380, p-ISSN: 2319-2372. Volume 8, Issue 3 Ver. II (Mar. 2015), PP 53-58 www.iosrjournals.org Poultry Litter/Manure Management Practices in Intensively Managed Poultry Farms in Portharcourt Ekenma Kalu Department Of Veterinary Public Health And Preventive Medicine. Micheal Okpara University Of Agriculture, Umudike. Abstract: The investigation to determine the different litter/manure management practices of poultry farmers was carried out in Port Harcourt urban area. A well structured questionnaire was administered to 30 randomly selected poultry farmers in the study area by one on one interview and observation of the environment. The results revealed that poultry farming is on the increase. Majority of these farmer’s management practices showed that they have little knowledge about proper disposal of litter/manure resulting from their farm operations. 53.3% sell their waste immediately after clearing their farms while 43.3% store them for later use and 3.4% applied theirs directly to nearby farm lands. During the period of study, 96.7 % of the farmers had not heard of manure treatment before disposal while 3.3% have heard of it but did not practice it. It was also noted that improper handling of poultry production from start to finish could lead to environmental hazards. Keywords: Intensively managed, Poultry farms, Litter/manure, Port Harcourt. I. Introduction Poultry is one of the most developed animal industries in Nigeria. Historically, the growth of poultry industry began as a result of its high level of energy and protein, rapid turnover rate and short incubation period (i.e.