DOCSLIB.ORG

Assessment 2016 West Africa Coastal Areas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Assessment 2016 West Africa coastal areas DETAILED MASTER PLAN 2016 UPDATING 2017 This document has been developed by the West African Coast Observation Mission with the support of the Centre for Ecological Monitoring (CSE) and the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as part of the implementation of UEMOA Regional Coastal Erosion Control program and the enforcement of article 10 of the Abidjan convention related to coastal erosion control through the implementing agency agreement entered into between UEMOA and CSE in November 2012. Table of contents SUMMARY TABLE OF SECTORS 4 GH - GHANA 171 MR - MAURITANIA 20 sandy terrace and coconut groves west Ghana – Cote d’Ivoire 172 Nouadhibou peninsula and the baie du levrier 21 Cape three points 173 Banc d’Arguin - north Nouakchott 26 urban sector and periurban extension of Sekondi - Takoradi 176 Nouakchott 29 Shama – Elmina Hinterland 182 south Mauritania and Senegal river delta 33 urban areas and extensions Elmina – Cape Coast - Saltpond 183 SENEGAL (NORTH) 37 rural Hinterland of urban areas of Cape Coast and Accra 187 Saint-Louis – Gandiolais – Grande cote 37 Accra west urban area 188 Dakar 44 Accra, east urban and outskirts area 189 Petite cote 53 volta delta right bank Ningo-Adafoah 194 Sine Saloum 61 volta delta left bank 198 GM - THE GAMBIA 68 TG - TOGO 204 SN - SENEGAL (SUD) 78 BJ - BENIN 212 Casamance maritime 79 Benin west area 213 GW - GUINEA BISSAU 84 Benin central west area 218 GN - GUINEA 92 Benin central east 221 northern area of Cap Verga—Tristao 93 Benin east area 225 mangrove of the central area 97 the urban and peri-urban area of Conakry 101 rice-growing islands in southern Guinea 104 SL - SIERRA LEONE 110 northern Sierra Leone 112 urban and periurban Freetown 115 Sierra Leone south center 119 Sherbro area - Liberia 121 LR - LIBERIA 125 Sierra Leone – Robertsport - Monroviaa 126 area under the influence of Monrovia 128 Dolota - Buchanan 135 Buchanan – Rivercess – Greenville - Grancess 138 Grancess – Cap Palmas 140 CI - COTE D’IVOIRE 143 Liberia border – San Pedro 144 est San Pedro – Sassandra - Fresco 150 Fresco - Assagny 152 rural sector Assagny – Jacqueville – Abidjan west 157 Abidjan – port Bouet 159 periurban area east Abidjan – Grand Bassam 163 sandy terrace and coconut groves in eastern Cote d’Ivoire 168 p.3 Summary table of sectors 2016 WEST AFRICA COASTAL AREAS ASSESSMENT DETAILED MASTER PLAN This table sums-up the main information per sectors gathered per areas and per country. The entries in red specify the Priority levels mo- One column has been added with regard to the dified since the SDLAO during the updating. SDLAO summary table which specifies the pro- tected areas existing in each sector. Sectors for which modifications have been made are in colored lines. Sectors colored in red are those posing the hi- ghest risk levels. In most cases, they are already subject to a special attention by States and deve- The column ‘potential developments’ indicates lopments are undertaken there. if the different prospective developments anti- cipated in 2020 during the SDLAO have in fact been confirmed or not. Those developments concern essentially the stakes and infrastruc- ture; as well as human occupancy dynamics p.4 Priority level Priority Monitoring- Monitoring- Core set of Confirmed N° Type Ref Name Protected area 2011 level 2016 observation 2011 observation 2016 problem issues devpt 2016 AREA MR1 NOUADHIBOU PENINSULA AND BAIE DU LÉVRIER Watch-keeping Without 1 Sector MR1-a Cap Blanc Low Medium for the purpose Cap Blanc satellite reserve ENVIRONMENT recommendation of anticipation Watch-keeping 2 Sector MR1-b Pointe and Cansado Bay Low Medium for the purpose Regular PERI-URBAN & PORT YES of anticipation Urban coastline and port 3 Sector MR1-c Medium Medium Regular Regular URBAN & PORT of Nouadhibou North Nouadhibou & Baie Intensive and Intensive and Baie de l’étoile protected area 4 Sector MR1-d Medium Medium ENVIRONMENT YES de l’Etoile regular regular (proposed) Banc d’Arguin national park Intensive and 5 Sector MR1-e Baie du Lévrier Medium Medium Regular Banc d’Arguin Ramsar Site ENVIRONMENT YES regular Banc d’Arguin World Heritage Site p.5 p.6 Priority level Priority Monitoring- Monitoring- Core set of Confirmed N° Type Ref Name Protected area 2011 level 2016 observation 2011 observation 2016 problem issues devpt 2016 AREA MR2 BANC D’ARGUIN – NORTH NOUAKCHOTT Banc d’Arguin national park 6 Sector MR2-a Banc d’Arguin (BANP) Low Medium Regular Regular Banc d’Arguin Ramsar Site ENVIRONMENT Banc d’Arguin World Heritage Site Banc d’Arguin national park Without 7 Sector MR2-b Mamghar – Majhrat Low Medium Regular Banc d’Arguin Ramsar Site ENVIRONMENT recommendation Banc d’Arguin World Heritage Site Watch-keeping Tanit – Sebkhra 8 Sector MR2-c Low Medium for the purpose Regular ANTICIPATION YES N’Dramcha of anticipation Watch-keeping 9 Sector MR2-d Djreidrat Low Medium for the purpose Regular ANTICIPATION YES of anticipation AREA MR3 NOUAKCHOTT Intensive and 10 Sector MR3-a North Nouakchott High High Regular URBAN & TOURISM YES regular Intensive and Intensive and 11 Sector MR3-b South Nouakchott Very high Very high URBAN & PORT YES regular regular AREA MR4 SOUTH MAURITANIA AND RIVER SENEGAL DELTA ENVIRONMENT & 12 Sector MR4-a PK 28 - South Tiguent Medium Medium Regular Regular YES ANTICIPATION Watch-keeping ENVIRONMENT & 13 Sector MR4-b South Tiguent - Chott Boul Low Medium for the purpose Regular YES ANTICIPATION of anticipation Chat Tboul Ramsar site Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Chott Boul - Ghara ENVIRONMENT & 14 Sector MR4-c Low Medium Regular Regular the river Senegal delta (Mauritania) (RBTDS) PORT Diawling National Park Diawling Ramsar site Chat Tboul Chat Tboul Ramsar site Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of 15 Sector MR4-d Ndiago Low Medium Regular Regular the river Senegal delta (Mauritania) ENVIRONMENT Diawling National Park Diawling Ramsar site AREA SN1 SAINT-LOUIS - GANDIOLAIS - GRANDE COTE Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Saint-Louis urban, peri- the river Senegal delta (Senegal) Intensive and Intensive and 16 Sector SN1-a urban and patrimony Very high Very high Djoudj Birds National Park URBAN & PERI-URBAN YES regular regular sector Djoudj Ramsar site Djoudj birds world heritage site Priority level Priority Monitoring- Monitoring- Core set of Confirmed N° Type Ref Name Protected area 2011 level 2016 observation 2011 observation 2016 problem issues devpt 2016 AREA MR2 BANC D’ARGUIN – NORTH NOUAKCHOTT Banc d’Arguin national park 6 Sector MR2-a Banc d’Arguin (BANP) Low Medium Regular Regular Banc d’Arguin Ramsar Site ENVIRONMENT Banc d’Arguin World Heritage Site Banc d’Arguin national park Without 7 Sector MR2-b Mamghar – Majhrat Low Medium Regular Banc d’Arguin Ramsar Site ENVIRONMENT recommendation Banc d’Arguin World Heritage Site Watch-keeping Tanit – Sebkhra 8 Sector MR2-c Low Medium for the purpose Regular ANTICIPATION YES N’Dramcha of anticipation Watch-keeping 9 Sector MR2-d Djreidrat Low Medium for the purpose Regular ANTICIPATION YES of anticipation AREA MR3 NOUAKCHOTT Intensive and 10 Sector MR3-a North Nouakchott High High Regular URBAN & TOURISM YES regular Intensive and Intensive and 11 Sector MR3-b South Nouakchott Very high Very high URBAN & PORT YES regular regular AREA MR4 SOUTH MAURITANIA AND RIVER SENEGAL DELTA ENVIRONMENT & 12 Sector MR4-a PK 28 - South Tiguent Medium Medium Regular Regular YES ANTICIPATION Watch-keeping ENVIRONMENT & 13 Sector MR4-b South Tiguent - Chott Boul Low Medium for the purpose Regular YES ANTICIPATION of anticipation Chat Tboul Ramsar site Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Chott Boul - Ghara ENVIRONMENT & 14 Sector MR4-c Low Medium Regular Regular the river Senegal delta (Mauritania) (RBTDS) PORT Diawling National Park Diawling Ramsar site Chat Tboul Chat Tboul Ramsar site Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of 15 Sector MR4-d Ndiago Low Medium Regular Regular the river Senegal delta (Mauritania) ENVIRONMENT Diawling National Park Diawling Ramsar site AREA SN1 SAINT-LOUIS - GANDIOLAIS - GRANDE COTE Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of Saint-Louis urban, peri- the river Senegal delta (Senegal) Intensive and Intensive and 16 Sector SN1-a urban and patrimony Very high Very high Djoudj Birds National Park URBAN & PERI-URBAN YES regular regular sector Djoudj Ramsar site Djoudj birds world heritage site Priority level Priority Monitoring- Monitoring- Core set of Confirmed N° Type Ref Name Protected area 2011 level 2016 observation 2011 observation 2016 problem issues devpt 2016 Transboundary Biosphere Reserve of the river Senegal delta (Senegal) Gueumbeul Special Wildlife Reserve South Saint-Louis – Intensive and Intensive and (IUCN Category IV) ENVIRONMENT & 17 Sector SN1-b High Very high YES Barbarie Split regular regular National Park of Barbarie Split (IUCN TOURISM Category II) Marine Protected area of Saint-Louis Gandon community Natural Reserve Darou Khoudoss community Natural Watch-keeping reserve 18 Sector SN1-c Grande Côte - Niayes Low Medium for the purpose Regular ANTICIPATION YES Notto Gouye Diama Community of anticipation Natural Reserve Watch-keeping Intensive and 19 Sector SN1-d Kayar - Guediawaye High Very high for the purpose Kayar Marine Protected area ENVIRONMENT YES regular of anticipation AREA SN2 DAKAR Dakar dune coastline Intensive and Intensive and 20 Sector SN2-a High High PERI-URBAN & URBAN North Camberene - Yoff regular regular Dakar rocky coastline Intensive and Intensive and 21 Sector SN2-b High Very High National Park of Magdalen islands URBAN West Yoff
Recommended publications
  • CONTROL of .ALLUVIAL RIVERS by STEEL JETTIES By

    CONTROL of .ALLUVIAL RIVERS by STEEL JETTIES By

    CONTROL OF .ALLUVIAL RIVERS BY STEEL JETTIES by E. 1. Carlson and R. A. Dodge, Jr. A paper to be presented at The First Water Resources Engineering Conference of The American Society of Civil Engineers, Omaha, Nebraska, May 14-18, 1962 CONTROL OF ALLUVIAL RIVERS BY STEEL JETTIES by E. J. Carlsonl / and R. A. Dodge, Jr. 2 / SYNOPSIS Both field and laboratory studies were conducted to refine the methods used in the design of steel jetty fields for river aline- ment. A set of dimensionless friction head-loss curves, verified by model studies are developed and described. Using the developed curves and reconnaissance field data, a method is given for predict- ing the changes in a riverbed after the designed jetty field is installed. /Head, Sediment Investigations Unit, Hydraulics Branch, Division of Engineering Laboratories, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado. 2 /Hydraulic Engineer, Hydraulics Branch, Division of Engineering Laboratories, Bureau of Reclamation, Denver, Colorado. INTRODUCTION Steel jacks and jetties have been used successfully by the Corps of Engineers, highway departments, railway companies, and others to prevent damage to riverbanks, levees, bridge abutments, and other structures. The Bureau of Reclamation and the Corps of Engineers are using them to stabilize the channel of the Rio Grande within the floodway in the Middle Rio Grande Valley. (1)1 / The individual jack unit consists of three angle irons, 12 or 16 feet in length placed at 90° angles in three planes and joined at their cen- ters, Figure 1. Wire is laced through the angle irons in a standard pattern to tie them together.
  • JPC.CCP Bureau Du Prdsident

    JPC.CCP Bureau Du Prdsident

    Onchoccrciasis Control Programmc in the Volta Rivcr Basin arca Programme de Lutte contre I'Onchocercose dans la R6gion du Bassin de la Volta JOIN'T PROCRAMME COMMITTEE COMITE CONJOINT DU PROCRAMME Officc of the Chuirrrran JPC.CCP Bureau du Prdsident JOINT PROGRAII"IE COMMITTEE JPC3.6 Third session ORIGINAL: ENGLISH L Bamako 7-10 December 1982 October 1982 Provisional Agenda item 8 The document entitled t'Proposals for a Western Extension of the Prograncne in Mali, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Ssnegal and Sierra Leone" was reviewed by the Corrrittee of Sponsoring Agencies (CSA) and is now transmitted for the consideration of the Joint Prograurne Conrnittee (JPC) at its third sessior:. The CSA recalls that the JPC, at its second session, following its review of the Feasibility Study of the Senegal River Basin area entitled "Senegambia Project : Onchocerciasis Control in Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, l,la1i, Senegal and Sierra Leone", had asked the Prograrrne to prepare a Plan of Operations for implementing activities in this area. It notes that the Expert Advisory Conrnittee (EAC) recormnended an alternative strategy, emphasizing the need to focus, in the first instance, on those areas where onchocerciasis was hyperendemic and on those rivers which were sources of reinvasion of the present OCP area (Document JPC3.3). The CSA endorses the need for onchocerciasis control in the Western extension area. However, following informal consultations, and bearing in mind the prevailing financial situation, the CSA reconrnends that activities be implemented in the area on a scale that can be managed by the Prograrmne and at a pace concomitant with the availability of funds, in order to obtain the basic data which have been identified as missing by the proposed plan of operations.
  • Dealing with Erosion: the Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods

    Dealing with Erosion: the Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods

    2ND ANNUAL CAPE COASTAL CONFERENCE Linking Science with Local Solutions and Decision-Making Dealing With Erosion: The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods Greg Berman (Woods Hole Sea Grant & Cape Cod Cooperative Extension) Photo Credit: Ted Keon Climate Change Impacts In Coastal Environments 34 5 12 Coastal Adaptation On Cape Cod we manage at parcel scale http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/regional/index.php?idp=223 The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods Why protect properties……..? Town of Brewster example The Facts The Implications Value = $333,000,000 (don’t want takings) Only ~1% of properties To keep the same revenue, ~3% of town area the tax rate would go from 8.18 to 9.06 but they make ~10% of the real estate taxes or ~$300 per household The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods • Do nothing 1. Will system recover by itself? 2. How far is the structure from the water? 3. Grandfathering protects structures (not lawn) before August 10, 1978 Photo Credit: Ann McNichol The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods • Do nothing • Vegetation Plant Natives: Root systems stabilize. Take up water. Break the impact of raindrops or wave-splash. Slow down runoff Remove Invasive The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods • Do nothing • Vegetation • Re-grade The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods • Do nothing Horizontal • Vegetation • Re-grade • Managed retreat V E R T I C A L The Spectrum of Coastal Erosion Control Methods • Do nothing Photo Credit: Ted Keon • Vegetation • Re-grade • Managed retreat • Beach
  • Livelihood Zone Descriptions

    Livelihood Zone Descriptions

    Government of Senegal COMPREHENSIVE FOOD SECURITY AND VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS (CFSVA) Livelihood Zone Descriptions WFP/FAO/SE-CNSA/CSE/FEWS NET Introduction The WFP, FAO, CSE (Centre de Suivi Ecologique), SE/CNSA (Commissariat National à la Sécurité Alimentaire) and FEWS NET conducted a zoning exercise with the goal of defining zones with fairly homogenous livelihoods in order to better monitor vulnerability and early warning indicators. This exercise led to the development of a Livelihood Zone Map, showing zones within which people share broadly the same pattern of livelihood and means of subsistence. These zones are characterized by the following three factors, which influence household food consumption and are integral to analyzing vulnerability: 1) Geography – natural (topography, altitude, soil, climate, vegetation, waterways, etc.) and infrastructure (roads, railroads, telecommunications, etc.) 2) Production – agricultural, agro-pastoral, pastoral, and cash crop systems, based on local labor, hunter-gatherers, etc. 3) Market access/trade – ability to trade, sell goods and services, and find employment. Key factors include demand, the effectiveness of marketing systems, and the existence of basic infrastructure. Methodology The zoning exercise consisted of three important steps: 1) Document review and compilation of secondary data to constitute a working base and triangulate information 2) Consultations with national-level contacts to draft initial livelihood zone maps and descriptions 3) Consultations with contacts during workshops in each region to revise maps and descriptions. 1. Consolidating secondary data Work with national- and regional-level contacts was facilitated by a document review and compilation of secondary data on aspects of topography, production systems/land use, land and vegetation, and population density.
  • Shadow Colony: Refugees and the Pursuit of the Liberian

    Shadow Colony: Refugees and the Pursuit of the Liberian

    © COPYRIGHT by Micah M. Trapp 2011 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED SHADOW COLONY: REFUGEES AND THE PURSUIT OF THE LIBERIAN- AMERICAN DREAM BY Micah M. Trapp ABSTRACT This dissertation is about the people living at the Buduburam Liberian refugee camp in Ghana and how they navigate their position within a social hierarchy that is negotiated on a global terrain. The lives of refugees living in Ghana are constituted through vast and complex social relations that span across the camp, Ghana, West Africa and nations further afield such as the United States, Canada and Australia. The conditions under which these relations have developed and continue to unfold are mediated by structural forces of nation-state policies, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the international governing body for refugees, and the global political economy. Situated within the broader politics of protracted refugee situations and the question of why people stay in long-term camps, this research is a case study of one refugee camp and how its people access resources, build livelihoods and struggle with power. In particular, this dissertation uses concepts of the Liberian-American dream and the shadow colony to explore the historic and contemporary terms and circumstances ii through which Liberian refugees experience and evaluate migratory prospects and restrictions. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The production of this dissertation has been an outcome of many places and people. In Washington, DC my committee members, Dolores Koenig, Geoffry Burkhart, and David Vine have provided patient support and provocative feedback throughout the entire process. Thank you for asking the right questions and reading so many pages.
  • Beach Nourishment Effects Østerstrand Fredericia - Denmark 2017

    Beach Nourishment Effects Østerstrand Fredericia - Denmark 2017

    Beach Nourishment Effects Østerstrand Fredericia - Denmark 2017 Juni 2020 Project Building with Nature (EU-InterReg) Start date 01.11.2016 End date 01.07.2020 Project manager (PM) Ane Høiberg Nielsen Project leader (PL) Per Sørensen Project staff (PS) Henrik Vinge Karlsson Time registering 402412 Approved date 26.06.2020 Signature Report Beach nourishment effects – Østerstrand, Frederica, Denmark Author Henrik Vinge Karlsson and Per Sørensen Keyword Beach nourishment, Nourishment design, Coastal protection, Building with nature, BWN, Fredericia, Østerstrand. Distribution www.kyst.dk, www.northsearegion.eu/building-with-nature Referred to as Kystdirektoratet (2020), Beach nourishment effects – Østerstrand, Frederica; Lemvig. 2 Beach Nourishment Effects Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Description of Study site .............................................................................................................................5 1.2 Division of study stretch..............................................................................................................................7 1.3 Description of Nourishment ......................................................................................................................7 1.4 Research design ..............................................................................................................................................8 1.4.1 Research questions..............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................9
  • The Effects of Urban and Economic Development on Coastal Zone Management

    The Effects of Urban and Economic Development on Coastal Zone Management

    sustainability Article The Effects of Urban and Economic Development on Coastal Zone Management Davide Pasquali 1,* and Alessandro Marucci 2 1 Environmental and Maritime Hydraulic Laboratory (LIAM), Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering (DICEAA), University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy 2 Department of Civil, Construction-Architectural and Environmental Engineering (DICEAA), University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The land transformation process in the last decades produced the urbanization growth in flat and coastal areas all over the world. The combination of natural phenomena and human pressure is likely one of the main factors that enhance coastal dynamics. These factors lead to an increase in coastal risk (considered as the product of hazard, exposure, and vulnerability) also in view of future climate change scenarios. Although each of these factors has been intensively studied separately, a comprehensive analysis of the mutual relationship of these elements is an open task. Therefore, this work aims to assess the possible mutual interaction of land transformation and coastal management zones, studying the possible impact on local coastal communities. The idea is to merge the techniques coming from urban planning with data and methodology coming from the coastal engineering within the frame of a holistic approach. The main idea is to relate urban and land changes to coastal management. Then, the study aims to identify if stakeholders’ pressure motivated the Citation: Pasquali, D.; Marucci, A. deployment of rigid structures instead of shoreline variations related to energetic and sedimentary The Effects of Urban and Economic Development on Coastal Zone balances.
  • ANPOWER ANALYSIS of the LIBERIAN NATIONAL POLICE

    ANPOWER ANALYSIS of the LIBERIAN NATIONAL POLICE

    Tzi ANPOWER ANALYSIS of the LIBERIAN NATIONAL POLICE Supplement to: Report To The Secretary of State By The U. S. Survey Mission To Liberia, Dated April 11, 1966 Novembe r/December 1966 -ojes' te'z 1-- -Js. / .reCpe 6 AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT j OFFICE OF PUBLIC SAFETY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20523 MANPOWER ANALYS IS OF THE LIBERIAN NATIONAL POLICE Supplement to: Report To The Secretary of State By the U. S. Survey Mission to Liberia, Dated April 11, 1966 Office of Public Safety Agency for International Development Frank A. Jessup Office of Public Safety NovemberlDecember 1966 PREFACE This report is intended to serve as a guide in forcasting the man­ power requirements associated with the continued development of the National Police Force of Liberia. The author wishes to acknowledge the predominant role played by the Honorable James A. A. Pierre, Attorney General of Liberia, in the development of the report. His continued personal interest, advice and support was invaluable to the successful execution of the project. Ref­ erence must also be made to the constructive advice and contributions made by Mr. E. Harding Smythe, Director, National Police Force and his staff. Similarly consequential were the contributions of Mr. Robert H. Nooter, Director, USAID to Liberia and members of the United States Mission to Liberia. Other very valuable individual contributions were made by Mr. Albert I. Sandsmark, Chief Public Safety Advisor, and his staff in the office of Public Safety. Grateful aclmowledgment is also extended to Colonel Robert A. Malone, Chief, United States Military Mission to Liberia, and his Chief of Staff, Benjamin Almond, for their counsel concerning the content of the report.
  • COASTAL HAZARDS Too Many People Living Too Close to the Edge of a Rising Sea

    COASTAL HAZARDS Too Many People Living Too Close to the Edge of a Rising Sea

    COASTAL HAZARDS Too Many People Living Too Close To The Edge Of A Rising Sea A Growing Challenge For The 21st Century This Report Is Part Of The Ocean On The Edge Series Produced By The Aquarium Of The Pacific As Products Of Its National Conference—Ocean On The Edge: Top Ocean Issues, May 2009 2 COASTAL HAZARDS Ocean on the Edge: Top Ocean Issues Making Ocean Issues Come Alive for the Public The conference brought together leading marine scientists and engineers, policy-makers, film-makers, exhibit designers, informal science educators, journalists and communicators to develop a portfolio of models for communicating major ocean issues to the public. This report is one of a series of reports from that conference. The reports include: Coastal Hazards, Marine Ecosystems and Fisheries, Pollution in the Ocean, and Critical Condition: Ocean Health and Human Health. There is also a series of briefer reports on film-making, kiosk messaging design, and communicating science to the public. All reports are available at www.aquariumofpacific.org COASTAL HAZARDS 3 4 COASTAL HAZARDS Acknowledgements Support for the “Ocean on the Edge Conference: Issues” held in May 2009, at Long Beach Top Ocean Issues” was provided by NOAA, Convention Center. Participants in the the National Science Foundation, Southern Coastal Hazards workshop session included: California Edison, SAVOR, the Long Beach Dr. Robert Dean, Dr. R. A. Dalrymple, Dr. Convention Center, and the Aquarium of the Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., Dr. Jerry R. Pacific. Schubel, and Dana Swanson. Sandy Eslinger was the facilitator of the session. Leah Young We are grateful to the Conference’s National and Margaret Schubel were the rapporteurs.
  • Shaping the Beach, One Wave at a Time New Research Is Deciphering How Currents, Waves, and Sands Change Our Shorelines

    Shaping the Beach, One Wave at a Time New Research Is Deciphering How Currents, Waves, and Sands Change Our Shorelines

    http://oceanusmag.whoi.edu/v43n1/raubenheimer.html Shaping the Beach, One Wave at a Time New research is deciphering how currents, waves, and sands change our shorelines By Britt Raubenheimer, Associate Scientist nearshore region—the stretch of sand, for a beach to erode or build up. Applied Ocean Physics & Engineering Dept. rock, and water between the dry land be- Understanding beaches and the adja- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution hind the beach and the beginning of deep cent nearshore ocean is critical because or years, scientists who study the water far from shore. To comprehend and nearly half of the U.S. population lives Fshoreline have wondered at the appar- predict how shorelines will change from within a day’s drive of a coast. Shoreline ent fickleness of storms, which can dev- day to day and year to year, we have to: recreation is also a significant part of the astate one part of a coastline, yet leave an • decipher how waves evolve; economy of many states. adjacent part untouched. One beach may • determine where currents will form For more than a decade, I have been wash away, with houses tumbling into the and why; working with WHOI Senior Scientist Steve sea, while a nearby beach weathers a storm • learn where sand comes from and Elgar and colleagues across the coun- without a scratch. How can this be? where it goes; try to decipher patterns and processes in The answers lie in the physics of the • understand when conditions are right this environment. Most of our work takes A Mess of Physics Near the Shore Many forces intersect and interact in the surf and swash zones of the coastal ocean, pushing sand and water up, down, and along the coast.
  • SALTWATER INTRUSION and CLIMATE CHANGE a Primer for Local and Provincial Decision-Makers

    SALTWATER INTRUSION and CLIMATE CHANGE a Primer for Local and Provincial Decision-Makers

    SALTWATER INTRUSION and CLIMATE CHANGE A primer for local and provincial decision-makers. Atlantic Climate Adaptation Solutions Association Saltwater Intrusion and Climate Change 1 SALTWATER INTRUSION and CLIMATE CHANGE Report Prepared by: Prince Edward Island Department of Environment, Labour and Justice Report Edited by: Doug Linzey, Fundy Communications, 2340 Gospel Rd, Canning NS Content Review and Project Management: Prince Edward Island Department of Environment, Labour and Justice, 11 Kent Street, Charlottetown, PE, C1A 7N8, [email protected] Disclaimer: This document was prepared for a specific purpose and should not be applied or relied upon for alternative uses without the permission, advice, and guidance of the authors, the provincial managers, and ACASA, or their respective designates. Users of this report do so at their own risk. Neither ACASA, the provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador, nor the authors of this report accept responsibility for damages suffered by any third party as a result of decisions or actions taken based on this report. Avertissement: Ce document a été préparé dans un but précis et ne devrait pas être appliqué ou invoqué pour d’autres utilisations sans autorisation, des conseils et des auteurs, les directeurs provinciaux et ACASA, ou leurs représentants respectifs. Les utilisateurs de ce rapport font à leurs risques et périls. Ni ACASA, les provinces de la Nouvelle-Écosse, au Nouveau-Brunswick, Île du Prince Édouard, Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador ou les auteurs de ce rapport acceptent la responsabilité pour les dommages subis par un tiers à la suite de décisions ou actions prises sur la base de ce rapport.
  • Impact of the Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak on Market Chains And

    Impact of the Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak on Market Chains And

    FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Dakar, 2016 The conclusions given in this information product are considered appropriate at the time of its preparation. They may be mod- ified in the light of further knowledge gained at subsequent stages of the project. In particular, the recommendations included in this information product were valid at the time they were written, during the FAO workshop on the market chains and trade of agricultural products in the context of the Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa, organized in December 2014 in Dakar, Senegal. The views expressed in this information product are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not men- tioned. ISBN 978-92-5-109223-1 © FAO, 2016 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise in- dicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.