DOCSLIB.ORG

The North Carolina State University Coastal and Estuary Storm Surge and Flood Prediction System

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The North Carolina State University Coastal and Estuary Storm Surge and Flood Prediction System Transactions on Ecology and the Environment vol 63, © 2003 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 The North Carolina State University coastal and estuary storm surge and flood prediction system L. J. Pietrafesa, L. Xie, D. A. Dickey, M. C. Peng & S. Yan College of Physical & Mathematical Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27691, USA Abstract The North Carolina State University Coastal and Estuary Marine & Environmental Prediction System (CEMEPS) is a coupled system of mathematical models. CEMEPS contains a suite of interactively linked atmospheric, oceanic, estuary and river model components. The model architecture couples mesoscale atmospheric models or event models such as hurricanes or a suite of atmospheric variable measurements, wind-fields and precipitation, to ocean basin, continental margin, and estuary hydrodynamic models to a river discharge-interaction model. So, winds and precipitation are both observed and modeled and water waves and currents and water levels are predicted. Thus, storm surge and estuary flooding can be accurately determined well in advance of a storm. CEMEPS output is routinely used by the North Carolina Office of the National Weather Service to make forecasts of coastal and estuary flooding during the passage of Tropical and Extra-Tropical Cyclones. While the model system is currently focused on the coasts of the Carolinas, CEMEPS could be ported to all coasts. The goal of CEMEPS is to improve the capacity of coastal communities to reduce flood impacts. l Introduction In a coastal location, flooding occurs when the actual water level in the adjacent ocean, estuary or inland water body significantly exceeds spring tidal levels or the banks of the containment barrier and intrudes onto the adjacent land. Thus, Transactions on Ecology and the Environment vol 63, © 2003 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 in order to predict coastal and inland flooding during a storm event, one must have accurate information of local land elevation and actual water level prior to and during the event. Along a coastline and in estuaries the total water level height is determined by 6 main factors: wind and pressure induced sea level rise or fall; wind induced waves; astronomical tides; seasonal modulation of the steric state of the ocean basins; freshwater input; and the estuary's water level. Here, we define a model scenario to develop a prognostic capability to accurately predict coastal and inland flooding in all of its aspects during the passages of high energy atmospheric events such as Tropical Cyclones. The NCSU coastal flooding model has been used to make real-time coastal flooding forecasts in the North Carolina coastal lagoon sound system since the 1993 hurricane season. The prediction has been generally accurate (within 10% of observations). The very first real-time test case was Hurricane Emily of 1993 [l]. For that case, the maximum water level along the Outer Banks, NC on the sound side predicted by NCSU model 12 hours in advance was not only within 0.5 feet of actual observations (of > 11 feet) but also 2 feet closer to observations than the National Hurricane Center's SLOSH model [2]. While NOAA's SLOSH model has been used for guidance by the NOAA National Weather Service (NWS), the NCSU CEMEPS has demonstrated an improved capability to predict coastal flooding on the NC coast both offshore and inshore. CEMEPS was intended to contain a suite of interactively linked oceanic and atmospheric model components as described in Xie [3]. Albeit, the passage of Hurricane Floyd in 1999 showed the need for an even more advanced predictive modeling capability. First, we should consider what the National Hurricane Center (NHC) presently uses for coastal flooding forecasts, the SLOSH model and its difference with CEMEPS. 2 SLOSH versus CEMEPS First, the SLOSH model is 2-D. It estimates the average motion of a water column and then computes the surface water level. However, it cannot explicitly reveal the water flow speed and direction near the bottom or any specific depth. Since an important factor determining the storm surge is bottom friction, 2-D storm surge models cannot properly estimate bottom stress and thus storm surge. CEMEPS is fully three-dimensional and the water column at each location is divided into levels. Water flow at each level is computed allowing the model to more accurately estimate the bottom stress by using the near-bottom flow instead of depth-averaged flow. Next, the SLOSH model does not consider the effect of fresh water. During "wet storms", runoff and river discharges can cause significant water level fluctuations near the river mouths and around the peripheries of the estuaries. CEMEPS has a mechanism to incorporate land and river runoff effects. Finally, unlike SLOSH, CEMEPS conserves water and has a physically correct lateral wetting and drying (inundation and retreat) boundary condition which allows the model to accurately estimate inland flooding by allowing water to move horizontally in equilibration with each ensuing time step. Unprecedented levels of flooding and 56 human fatalities followed the rapid Transactions on Ecology and the Environment vol 63, © 2003 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 passage of Hurricane Floyd across North Carolina (NC), 16-17 September, 1999. The net damage ascribed to Humcane Floyd, a Cat 2, was estimated to be in excess of $6B. Why? Well, circumstantially, Hurricane Dennis, a Cat l, had been present on the NC coast over the period 30 August- 06 September. Paths of Dennis and Floyd are in Figure 1. This is what physically occurred. Figure 1: 1999 North Atlantic Tropical Cyclone Map for the paths of Hurricanes Dennis and Royd derived from NOAA National Hurricane Center information. Dennis' winds mechanically drove coastal waters towards the coast, and simultaneously drove inshore sound waters from the northeast end of Parnlico Sound towards the southwest end. The offshore rise of water and inshore drop of water resulted in a hydraulic head along the axes of the barrier island inlets, particularly Oregon Inlet. This head drove a persistent non-tidal current of up to more than 2 knots for -6 days, into the sound. The amount of coastal ocean water which entered the sound system during Dennis' presence (1.4x109m3) was equivalent to 75% of the amount of water already present in the sound (1.86x109m3)prior to the hurricanes arrival so the total volume of water in the sound expanded to 3.26x109m3of water (Fig. 3). Both Dennis and Floyd had heavy precipitation (Fig. 2). The enormous amount of water in Parnlico Sound dammed up or blocked the flows at the mouths of all tributaries into Pamlico Sound, causing the rivers to go into relative storage modes and thus backed waters up towards the heads of the rivers (Fig. 3). Following Dennis' departure, the waters in the sound began to discharge through the three inlets (outlets) but within a week and a half, along came Floyd (Fig. l). River waters were still blocked at their mouths and riverlestuary waters expanded explosively over the banks. The subsequent flooding was directly related to existing water levels prior to the arrival of Floyd (Figs. 4,s). Transactions on Ecology and the Environment vol 63, © 2003 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 a. Hurricane Dennis Rainfall September 4-5,1999 North Carolina Precipitation in Inches Based on Prelimfnary Data b. Hurricane Floyd Rainfall September 14-16,1999 North Carolina Figure 2: Precipitation associated with Dennis and Floyd. The message here is that during the passage of the two very wet hurricanes, the coastal ocean and estuary and rivers coupled in a way that produced massive lateral flooding. No modeling architecture or combination of data and models existed at the time to have properly predicted the massive flooding that ensued. CEMEPS was designed to overcome these shortcomings. Transactions on Ecology and the Environment vol 63, © 2003 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 Wnshingmn Oregon Duck a. 3 1 1. 9, Dxk-Oregon - - Washington-Oregon Year Day Figure 3: (a) 40 hour low pass time series of sea level at Duck, Oregon Inlet, and Washington North Carolina for the period 8125-9/20, 1999 (b) 40 hour low pass of the difference in sea level from outside Oregon Inlet and inside Oregon Inlet(Duck minus Oregon) and from Oregon Inlet to Little Washington (Washington minus Oregon) for the period 8/25 9/20, 1999 (c) Northeastward(+)/Southwestward(-) component of the Wind Stress vector time series at Cape Lookout during the period 8/25-9120, 1999 (d) Volumetric flux of water through Oregon Inlet during 30 August - 20 September, 1999 (e) Cumulative volumetric flux through Oregon Inlet from 30 August- 20 September, 1999. Transactions on Ecology and the Environment vol 63, © 2003 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 CORRELATION BETWEEN SURGE AND FLOOD 80. r7md Tendency (KmA2) 60- -SurgeAnmaly (mch) do. -80. , . 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 ExhHng Rmd Lcvcl (m) Figure 4: Surge and lateral inundation vs. existing water level in Parnlico Sound. Figure 5: SeaWifs image 23 September. 3 The CEMEPS architecture CEMEPS includes one of several mesoscale atmospheric models, a coastal ocean model, the Princeton University Ocean Model (POM), [4], coupled to a 3rd generation wave model WAM Cycle4, and the estuary model of Xie and Pietrafesa [3] based on the earlier version of Pietrafesa [l]. Tides are simulated Transactions on Ecology and the Environment vol 63, © 2003 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 Transfer Rain - - > Flow Model inoludas p10 d effect (intervention) Jaalzco DATE PLOT -Ferecaat: Pamlico Pamlico Flow -- Lover 950 Confxdenca Limit -- Upper 95% Confidence Limit Figure 6: River discharge vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A FAILURE of INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina
    A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina U.S. House of Representatives 4 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Union Calendar No. 00 109th Congress Report 2nd Session 000-000 A FAILURE OF INITIATIVE Final Report of the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Report by the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoacess.gov/congress/index.html February 15, 2006. — Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U. S. GOVERNMEN T PRINTING OFFICE Keeping America Informed I www.gpo.gov WASHINGTON 2 0 0 6 23950 PDF For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 Fax: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 COVER PHOTO: FEMA, BACKGROUND PHOTO: NASA SELECT BIPARTISAN COMMITTEE TO INVESTIGATE THE PREPARATION FOR AND RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA TOM DAVIS, (VA) Chairman HAROLD ROGERS (KY) CHRISTOPHER SHAYS (CT) HENRY BONILLA (TX) STEVE BUYER (IN) SUE MYRICK (NC) MAC THORNBERRY (TX) KAY GRANGER (TX) CHARLES W. “CHIP” PICKERING (MS) BILL SHUSTER (PA) JEFF MILLER (FL) Members who participated at the invitation of the Select Committee CHARLIE MELANCON (LA) GENE TAYLOR (MS) WILLIAM J.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Service Assessment': Hurricane Isabel September 18-19, 2003
    Service Assessment Hurricane Isabel September 18-19, 2003 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Silver Spring, Maryland Cover: Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Rapid Response Team imagery, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 1555 UTC September 18, 2003. Service Assessment Hurricane Isabel September 18-19, 2003 May 2004 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Donald L. Evans, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., U.S. Navy (retired), Administrator National Weather Service Brigadier General David L. Johnson, U.S. Air Force (Retired), Assistant Administrator Preface The hurricane is one of the most potentially devastating natural forces. The potential for disaster increases as more people move to coastlines and barrier islands. To meet the mission of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Weather Service (NWS) - provide weather, hydrologic, and climatic forecasts and warnings for the protection of life and property, enhancement of the national economy, and provide a national weather information database - the NWS has implemented an aggressive hurricane preparedness program. Hurricane Isabel made landfall in eastern North Carolina around midday Thursday, September 18, 2003, as a Category 2 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Scale (Appendix A). Although damage estimates are still being tabulated as of this writing, Isabel is considered one of the most significant tropical cyclones to affect northeast North Carolina, east central Virginia, and the Chesapeake and Potomac regions since Hurricane Hazel in 1954 and the Chesapeake-Potomac Hurricane of 1933. Hurricane Isabel will be remembered not for its intensity, but for its size and the impact it had on the residents of one of the most populated regions of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005
    MARCH 2008 ANNUAL SUMMARY 1109 ANNUAL SUMMARY Atlantic Hurricane Season of 2005 JOHN L. BEVEN II, LIXION A. AVILA,ERIC S. BLAKE,DANIEL P. BROWN,JAMES L. FRANKLIN, RICHARD D. KNABB,RICHARD J. PASCH,JAMIE R. RHOME, AND STACY R. STEWART Tropical Prediction Center, NOAA/NWS/National Hurricane Center, Miami, Florida (Manuscript received 2 November 2006, in final form 30 April 2007) ABSTRACT The 2005 Atlantic hurricane season was the most active of record. Twenty-eight storms occurred, includ- ing 27 tropical storms and one subtropical storm. Fifteen of the storms became hurricanes, and seven of these became major hurricanes. Additionally, there were two tropical depressions and one subtropical depression. Numerous records for single-season activity were set, including most storms, most hurricanes, and highest accumulated cyclone energy index. Five hurricanes and two tropical storms made landfall in the United States, including four major hurricanes. Eight other cyclones made landfall elsewhere in the basin, and five systems that did not make landfall nonetheless impacted land areas. The 2005 storms directly caused nearly 1700 deaths. This includes approximately 1500 in the United States from Hurricane Katrina— the deadliest U.S. hurricane since 1928. The storms also caused well over $100 billion in damages in the United States alone, making 2005 the costliest hurricane season of record. 1. Introduction intervals for all tropical and subtropical cyclones with intensities of 34 kt or greater; Bell et al. 2000), the 2005 By almost all standards of measure, the 2005 Atlantic season had a record value of about 256% of the long- hurricane season was the most active of record.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner's Guide for Hurricane Awareness
    Mariner’s Guide For Hurricane Awareness In The North Atlantic Basin Eric J. Holweg [email protected] Meteorologist Tropical Analysis and Forecast Branch Tropical Prediction Center National Weather Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration August 2000 Internet Sites with Weather and Communications Information Of Interest To The Mariner NOAA home page: http://www.noaa.gov NWS home page: http://www.nws.noaa.gov NWS marine dissemination page: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/marine/home.htm NWS marine text products: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/marine/forecast.htm NWS radio facsmile/marine charts: http://weather.noaa.gov/fax/marine.shtml NWS publications: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/om/nwspub.htm NOAA Data Buoy Center: http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov NOAA Weather Radio: http://www.nws.noaa.gov/nwr National Ocean Service (NOS): http://co-ops.nos.noaa.gov/ NOS Tide data: http://tidesonline.nos.noaa.gov/ USCG Navigation Center: http://www.navcen.uscg.mil Tropical Prediction Center: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/ High Seas Forecasts and Charts: http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/forecast.html Marine Prediction Center: http://www.mpc.ncep.noaa.gov SST & Gulfstream: http://www4.nlmoc.navy.mil/data/oceans/gulfstream.html Hurricane Preparedness & Tracks: http://www.fema.gov/fema/trop.htm Time Zone Conversions: http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/zones.html Table of Contents Introduction and Purpose ................................................................................................................... 1 Disclaimer ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Response of Forested Lands During The
    HYDROLOGICAND WATER-QUALITYRESPONSE OF FORESTED AND AGRICULTURALLANDS DURING THE 1999 EXTREME WEATHERCONDITIONS IN EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA J. D. Shelby, G. M. Chescheir, R. W. Skaggs, D. M. Amatya ABSTRACT. This study evaluated hydrologic and water-quality data collected on a coastal-plain research watershed during a series of hurricanes and tropical storms that hit coastal North Carolina in 1999, including hurricanes Dennis, Floyd, and Irene. DUring September and October 1999, the research watershed received approximately 555 mm of rainfall associated with hurricanes. This was the wettest such period in a 49-year historical weather record (1951 -1999). Prior to the hurricanes, the watershed experienced a dry late wintel; spring, and summer (565 cm for Feb.-Aug.). Tlzis was the third driest such period in the 49-year record Maximum daily flow rates measured across the research watershed were greater during hurricane Floyd than for any other time in a four-year (1996-1999) study of the watershed. Daily flows observed for an agricultural subwatershed were generally greater than for a forested subwatershed throughout the study, and during the hurricanes of 1999. Daily nutrient loads measured across the research watershed were greater during hurricane Floyd than for any other time in the study. In general, the two-month period of hurricanes produced total nitrogen and total phosphorus loads nearly equal to average loads for an entire year: Total annual nitrogen export from an agricultural subwatershed was 18 kghin 1999, with 11 kgh(61 %) lost during September and October: Total annual nitrogen export from a forested subwatershed was 15 kghin 1999, with 10 kgha (67%)lost during September and October: The nitrogen export observed in the forested subwatershed was high compared to other forested areas, likely due to the highly permeable organic soils in the watershed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Hurricane on Caribbean Tourist Arrivals 2013
    Tourism Economics, 2013, 19 (6), 1401–1409 doi: 10.5367/te.2013.0238 The impact of hurricane strikes on tourist arrivals in the Caribbean CHARLEY GRANVORKA CEREGMIA, Université des Antilles et de la Guyane, Pointe-à-Pitre, Guadeloupe ERIC STROBL Department of Economics, École Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau, France, and SALISES, University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago. E-mail: [email protected]. (Corresponding author.) The authors quantify the impact of hurricane strikes on the tourism industry in the Caribbean. To this end they first derive a hurricane destruction index that allows them to calculate the actual wind speed experienced at any locality relative to the hurricane eye of a passing or land falling hurricane. They then employ this hurricane index in a cross-country panel data context to estimate its impact on country- level tourist numbers. The results suggest that an average hurricane strike causes tourism arrivals to be about 2% lower than they would have been had no strike occurred. Keywords: hurricanes; tourist arrivals; Caribbean The Caribbean is more dependent on tourism to sustain livelihoods than almost any other region of the world in that the sector often serves as the primary industry or at least as a major earner of foreign exchange. For example, in terms of output generation, in the British Virgin Islands, Antigua and Barbuda, and Anguilla tourism constitutes over 70% of gross domestic product (GDP), while in other islands, such as Aruba, Barbados and the Bahamas, more than half of GDP is generated through tourism and related receipts (World Travel and Tourism Council, 2010).
    [Show full text]
  • MICROCOMP Output File
    II 106TH CONGRESS 1ST SESSION S. 1610 To authorize additional emergency disaster relief for victims of Hurricane Dennis and Hurricane Floyd. IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 Mr. EDWARDS (for himself and Mr. ROBB) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry A BILL To authorize additional emergency disaster relief for victims of Hurricane Dennis and Hurricane Floyd. 1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa- 2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 3 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS OF AD- 4 DITIONAL AMOUNT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000 5 FOR DISASTER RELIEF FOR THE VICTIMS OF 6 HURRICANE FLOYD. 7 (a) FINDINGS.ÐCongress finds thatÐ 8 (1) between August 29 and September 9, 1999, 9 Hurricane Dennis hovered off the coast of North 2 1 Carolina and eventually made landfall off Cape Hat- 2 teras; 3 (2) Hurricane Dennis brought 20 inches of rain 4 to portions of North Carolina, wiped out significant 5 portions of the highway network on the North Caro- 6 lina Outer Banks, and flooded homes and busi- 7 nesses; 8 (3) Hurricane Dennis caused millions of dollars 9 in damage to houses, businesses, farms, fishermen, 10 roads, beaches and protective dunes; 11 (4) between September 14 and 16, 1999, Hur- 12 ricane Floyd menaced most of the southeastern sea- 13 board of the United States, provoking the largest 14 peace time evacuation of eastern Florida, the Geor- 15 gia coast, the South Carolina coast, and the North 16 Carolina
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    EX E CUTIV E SUMMARY CLIVE WILKINSON AND DAVID SOUTER 2005 – a hot year zx 2005 was the hottest year on average since the advent of reliable records in 1880. zx That year exceeded the previous 9 record years, which have all been within the last 15 years. zx 2005 also exceeded 1998 which previously held the record as the hottest year; there were massive coral losses throughout the world in 1998. zx Large areas of particularly warm surface waters developed in the Caribbean and Tropical Atlantic during 2005. These were clearly visible in satellite images as HotSpots. zx The first HotSpot signs appeared in May, 2005 and rapidly expanded to cover the northern Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico and the mid-Atlantic by August. zx The HotSpots continued to expand and intensify until October, after which winter conditions cooled the waters to near normal in November and December. zx The excessive warm water resulted in large-scale temperature stress to Caribbean corals. 2005 – a hurricane year zx The 2005 hurricane year broke all records with 26 named storms, including 13 hurricanes. zx In July, the unusually strong Hurricane Dennis struck Grenada, Cuba and Florida. zx Hurricane Emily was even stronger, setting a record as the strongest hurricane to strike the Caribbean before August. zx Hurricane Katrina in August was the most devastating storm to hit the USA. It caused massive damage around New Orleans. Status of Caribbean Coral Reefs after Bleaching and Hurricanes in 2005 zx Hurricane Rita, a Category 5 storm, passed through the Gulf of Mexico to strike Texas and Louisiana in September.
    [Show full text]
  • GSA TODAY • Southeastern, P
    Vol. 9, No. 12 December 1999 INSIDE Section Meetings • Northeastern, p. 14 GSA TODAY • Southeastern, p. 18 A Publication of the Geological Society of America • South-Central, p. 22 Hurricanes Dennis and Floyd: Coastal Effects and Policy Implications Robert S. Young, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resources Management, Western Carolina University, Culhowee, NC 28723, [email protected] David M. Bush, Department of Geology, State University of West Georgia, Carrollton, GA 30118, [email protected] Andrew S. Coburn, acoburn@alumni. duke.edu, Orrin H. Pilkey, opilkey@geo. duke.edu, Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines, Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708 William J. Cleary, Center for Marine Science Research, UNC—Wilmington, 601 South College Road, Wilmington, NC 28403-3297, [email protected] ABSTRACT Tropical systems Dennis and Floyd impacted eastern North Carolina in Figure 1. Erosion on Oak Island, North Carolina by Hurricane Floyd in 1999. Pilings on the house and 1999, the fourth and fifth storms in exposed, broken septic tanks lining the beach indicate that the beach profile was lowered approximately three years to make landfall in this area. 1 m during the storm. Septic tanks are emplaced with drain fields above the water table, which limits All five storms were very similar in their location in nearshore environments. As an example of the range of impacts of human development in the coastal zone, before Floyd the recreational beach was situated directly above these septic systems. strength (wind speed); however, the effects on the coast were quite different.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Floyd / Hurricane Matthew Empirical Disaster Resilience Study
    Hurricane Floyd / Hurricane Matthew Empirical Disaster Resilience Study 2015-ST-061-ND001-01 Project Number: 5107321 March 22, 2019 Prepared for: Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate Office of University Programs and The University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill Coastal Resilience Center of Excellence 100 Europa Drive, Suite 540 Chapel Hill, NC 27517 Prepared by: AECOM 12420 Milestone Center Drive Suite 150 Germantown, MD 20876 T: +1 (301) 820 3000 F: +1 (301) 820 3009 aecom.com Hurricane Floyd/Hurricane Matthew Empirical Disaster Resilience Study Project Reference: 2015-ST-061-ND001-01 Project Number: 5107321 Abstract Two types of studies were conducted. An exploratory study examined whether 17 theoretical indicators of resilience demonstrate whether communities saved time and money as they recovered from Hurricane Matthew. The other study, a losses avoided study, examined whether the acquisition of flood-prone properties by county and municipal governments increased resilience following Hurricane Matthew. The hazard mitigation projects in the study were implemented after Hurricane Floyd, which struck the coast of North Carolina in 1999 and caused $2 billion of damage, and before Hurricane Matthew, which struck the coast of South Carolina in 2016 and moved north, causing $967 million in North Carolina. Exploratory Study The exploratory study used empirical measures of pre-Hurricane Matthew conditions (indicators of resilience) and Hurricane Matthew outcomes in six eastern North Carolina counties. Measures of 17 indicators of resilience (independent variables) were compared to post- Hurricane Matthew outcomes (dependent variables) (dependent variables. Each hypothesized outcome was that higher levels of an indicator of resilience led to less damage to privately owned structures or public infrastructure and a less time-consuming recovery from Hurricane Matthew.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Dennis Storm Tide Summary
    Hurricane Dennis Preliminary Water Levels *For the purpose of timely release, data contained within this report have undergone a “limited” NOS Quality Assurance/Control; however, the data have not yet undergone final verification. All data subject to NOS verification. July 2005 noaa National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services SUMMARY Hurricane Dennis made landfall near Pensacola, FL as Category 3 Hurricane on 10 July @ 4:00pm EDT. At the time of landfall maximum sustained winds were near 105 mph and the minimum central pressure was 950 MB. Water level stations from Key West, FL to Southwest Pass, LA were impacted by Hurricane Dennis. Apalachicola, FL recorded the highest storm tide of 2.452m (8.05ft) above MLLW. Cedar Key, FL recorded 2.373m (7.79 ft); Panama City Beach, FL recorded 2.070m (6.79 ft); Panama City, FL recorded 1.703m (5.59 ft). Figure 1. Hurricane Dennis made landfall near Pensacola, FL and continued north through Alabama on 10 July 05. NOAA NOS CO-OPS Hurricane DENNIS Preliminary Report *For the purpose of timely release, data contained within this report have undergone a “limited” NOS Quality Assurance/Control; however, the data have not yet undergone final verification. All data subject to NOS verification. Table 1. Storm Tide Summary for Hurricane Dennis. For the purposes of timely release of data, the data contained within this report has undergone preliminary NOS Quality Assurance/Quality Control. A final report will be released following NOS data verification. Max Water Level Predicted Max Water Level Predicted above MLLW Water Levels Difference above MLLW Water Levels Difference Station Name Station ID Latitude Longitude Date/Time GMT Storm Tide (m) (m) (m) Storm Tide (ft) (ft) (ft) Key West, FL 8724580 24 33.2 N 81 48.5 W 07-09-05 14:42 0.906 0.514 0.392 2.97 1.69 1.29 Naples, FL 8725110 26 7.8 N 81 48.4 W 07-10-05 05:12 1.297 0.483 0.814 4.26 1.59 2.67 Fort Myers, FL 8725520 26 38.
    [Show full text]
  • Caribbean: Hurricanes Dennis & Emily
    CARIBBEAN: HURRICANES DENNIS & 9 August 2005 EMILY: FOCUS ON HAITI AND JAMAICA The Federation’s mission is to improve the lives of vulnerable people by mobilizing the power of humanity. It is the world’s largest humanitarian organization and its millions of volunteers are active in over 181 countries. In Brief Appeal No. 05EA014; Operations Update no. 03; Period covered: 26 July to 3 August 2005; Appeal coverage: 70.22%; (the contributions list is being updated and will be attached to the next operations update). Appeal history: · Launched on 15 July 2005 for CHF 758,000 (USD 587,505 or EUR 486,390) for 3 months to assist 29,000 beneficia ries (5,800 beneficiary familie s). · Disaster Relief Emergency Funds (DREF) allocated: CHF 250,000 · The total funding sought under this appeal has been increased to CHF 852,612 Click here to access the revised budget for the operation. Outstanding Needs: CHF 253,932 Related Emergency or Annual Appeals: Caribbean Annual Appeal 05AA041; Guyana: Floods Emergency Appeal 05EA001 Operational Summary: Relief distributions are underway in Haiti, in Saint Marc and Petit and Grand Goâves. Families hit by Hurricane Dennis in Petit and Grand Goâves have received allocated relief items, including 300 hygiene kits, blankets, body and laundry soap. The remaining items will be distributed by the Haitian National Red Cross Society (HNRCS) to Côtes-de -Fer, Bainet and Roseau in the coming days . In addition, 800 kitchen kits, 800 blankets, 2,400 boxes of laundry soap and 2,400 bars of toilet soap have been distributed to 800 beneficiary families in Saint Marc in Bas Artibonite .
    [Show full text]