Brandon Road: Appendix A
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
GLMRIS – Brandon Road Appendix A - Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report August 2017 US Army Corps of Engineers Rock Island & Chicago Districts The Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin Study—Brandon Road Draft Integrated Feasibility Study and Environmental Impact Statement—Will County, Illinois (Page Intetionally Left Blank) List of Attachments Attachment 1: Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report Transmittal Memo Attachment 2: Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report Attachment 3: Appendix I—Corps Future Without Project Condition Factsheet Attachment 4: Appendix II—U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Planning Aid Letter to Corps Attachment 5: Appendix III—Corps Combined GLMRIS-BR Factsheets Attachment 6: Appendix IV—U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Planning Aid Letter to Corps Attachment 7: Appendix V—Great Lakes Fish Table Attachment 8: Appendix VI—Des Plaines River Fish Table Attachment 9: Appendix VII—Des Plaines River U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Fish Table Attachment 10: Appendix VIII—Scoping Comments from Illinois Department of Natural Resources Attachment 11: Appendix IX—Indiana Department of Natural Resources Comments on the Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report Attachment 12: Appendix X—2016 Des Plaines River Management Plan Attachment 13: Appendix XI—Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Comments on Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report A-1 A-2 Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report On U.S. Army Corps of Engineers GLMRIS – Brandon Road Project Prepared by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Carterville Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office Marion, IL U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Midwest Regional Office Fisheries Program Ecological Services Program Bloomington, IL U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Green Bay Fish & Wildlife Conservation Office New Franken, WI U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Midwest Region Bloomington, Minnesota September 2016 A-3 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose, Scope, & Authority ......................................................................................................... 1 FWCA Agency Coordination ........................................................................................................ 1 Prior Studies and Reports .............................................................................................................. 6 DESCRIPTION OF THE STUDY AREA ....................................................................................... 7 DESCRIPTION OF CORPS’ ALTERNATIVES ............................................................................ 9 1. No New Federal Action............................................................................................................ 9 2. Non-structural Alternative........................................................................................................ 9 3. Technology Alternative – Continuous Electric Barrier............................................................ 9 4. Technology Alternative – Complex Noise ............................................................................ 10 5. Technology Alternative - Complex Noise with Intermittent Electric Barrier ....................... 10 6. Technology Alternative - Complex Noise with Continuous Electric Barrier ........................ 10 7. Lock Closure .......................................................................................................................... 10 FISH AND WILDLIFE CONCERNS AND PLANNING OBJECTIVES .................................... 12 DESCRIPTION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCE CONDITIONS .................................. 16 The Great Lakes .......................................................................................................................... 16 Cultural and Economic Significance ....................................................................................... 17 Ecosystem/Habitat Characteristics .......................................................................................... 18 Aquatic Species Communities ................................................................................................. 22 Interjurisdictional Species ....................................................................................................... 27 Overview and Threats/Stresses ................................................................................................ 29 Overview of Restoration and Recovery Efforts ...................................................................... 30 The Des Plaines River ................................................................................................................. 31 Cultural and Economic Significance ....................................................................................... 32 Biological Significance ............................................................................................................ 33 Aquatic Species Communities ................................................................................................. 33 Interjurisdictional Species ....................................................................................................... 37 Overview of Threats/Stresses .................................................................................................. 39 A-4 Overview of Restoration and Recovery Efforts ...................................................................... 40 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY............................................................................................... 41 EVALUATION AND COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES .................................................... 43 FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION MEASURES AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........ 52 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 54 A-5 APPENDICIES I. Corps’ Future Without Project Condition for Asian Carp, November 13, 2015 II. USFWS PAL to the Corps, October 30, 2015 III. Corps’ GLMRIS-Brandon Road Draft December 2015 Factsheets, December 2015 IV. USFWS PAL to the Corps, March 31, 2016 V. List of the fishes of the Great Lakes and their Federal/State listing statuses VI. List of the fishes of the Des Plaines River including tributaries from 2013 survey VII. List of the fish collected by the Service from the Upper Des Plaines River from 2011- 2015 VIII. GLMRIS Brandon Road Scoping Comments from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources to the Corps, January 16, 2015 IX. Indiana Department of Natural Resources’ letter to the USFWS with comments on the draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report, September 6, 2016 X. Illinois Department of Natural Resources Des Plaines River Fishery Management Plan, June 2016 XI. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources’ letter to the USFWS with comments on the draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report, September 12, 2016 A-6 INTRODUCTION Purpose, Scope, & Authority The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is evaluating seven alternatives for controlling the upstream movement of Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) at Brandon Road Lock and Dam (BRLD). These measures are focused on preventing the transfer of three key species as identified in the Great Lakes Mississippi River Interbasin Study (GLMRIS) - Bighead Carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis), Silver Carp (H. molitrix; collectively Asian carp), and a scud (Apocorophium lacustre). The BRLD project will assess the efficacy of establishing a single point to control the upstream transfer of ANS from the Mississippi River basin into the Great Lakes basin at the BRLD site. Construction of one-way ANS controls near BRLD is anticipated to enhance protections for the Great Lakes basin while also providing additional information and technology to inform potential two-way risk reduction solutions. Brandon Road Lock and Dam was identified in the GLMRIS analyses as the only single location that can address upstream transfer of Mississippi River species through all Chicago Area Waterway System pathways. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) involvement in this project is authorized by the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (FWCA). At the request of the Corps, the Service is assisting in coordination with State fish and wildlife management agencies on formal comment and review of the project under the FWCA. The FWCA establishes fish and wildlife conservation as a co-equal purpose or objective of federally-funded or permitted water resource development proposals or projects. A required product under this FWCA consultation is the Draft Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Report (DFWCAR) which outlines the Service’s fish and wildlife concerns and planning objectives, evaluates the anticipated impacts of the alternatives on the significant resources, and recommends alternatives that the Corps should consider selecting with input from affected states fish and wildlife agencies. The Service has submitted two Planning Aid Letters (PAL) to the Corps providing preliminary comments on the BRLD project and the pending evaluation of the proposed alternatives. This DFWCAR does not constitute the FINAL report of the Secretary of the Interior as required by Section 2(b) of the FWCA. After the Corps selects an alternative, the Service will revise this draft FWCAR and provide the final FWCAR in fulfillment with Section 2(b) of the FWCA. FWCA Agency Coordination