4 Management of Acid Grassland (Pdf)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4 Management of Acid Grassland (Pdf) 04 Kent Wildlife Trust Land Management Advice Series Management of Acid Grassland This advice sheet contains information about the following topics: ● the importance of this habitat in Kent ● species associated with this habitat ● choosing a management regime for your site ● increasing the plant diversity of the site ● choosing livestock and finding a suitable grazier Acid heathland/grassland mosaic at Hothfield Heathlands © Kent Wildlife Trust ● protected species This leaflet is designed to give owners Up until the Second World War, traditional ● dealing with ragwort and other of acid grassland some general grazing practices ensured that grasslands problem plants recommendations on how to manage were grazed in a low intensity, wildlife- ● their land and assumes that the primary friendly manner, resulting in habitats which dealing with scrub objective is to manage the land for were botanically very diverse. ● references and further reading nature conservation purposes. Other ● further advice advice sheets are available and are From the 1940s onwards, more efficient listed in the Further Reading section. farming techniques such as better drainage and chemical inputs, together with farming Acid grassland in Kent subsidies, all contributed to change the way our grasslands were used: many Species-rich acid grassland is mainly areas were either ‘improved’, ploughed up found on the Greensand Ridge, in the for crops, or left ungrazed and gradually High Weald and in parts of the Blean, taken over by scrub and woodland. Other Dartford and Dungeness areas, although areas were lost to development, quarrying, occasional patches occur on sands and road construction and tree planting. Since gravels overlying the chalk in the Downs. then, traditionally managed, wildflower- It is a particularly rare habitat, of which rich grasslands have declined nationally only 512 hectares are left in Kent (ARCH by 97%; their disappearance is thought Kent Habitat Survey 2012) and it is listed to have led to the drastic decline of many as a Priority Habitat in the Kent Biodiversity species including bumblebees, farmland Action Plan. It tends to be associated with birds and wildflowers. It is therefore parkland, old pastures and commons, and important that land managers and it is often found in mosaics with heathland conservationists across Kent work to re- Betony © I.Rickards and woodlands. establish a network of acid grassland. Large print version available by calling 01622 662012 Your living landscape. Your living seas. Keeled skimmer dragonfly © Kent Wildlife Trust Comma butterfly on devil’s-bit Knole Park © C.Blackburn scabious © I.Rickards Female adder © Dr Lee Brady Species associated with Wildflower species found on acid grassland Ground-nesting birds such as skylarks acid grassland in Kent: bell heather, betony, bilberry, and meadow pipits will use this habitat bird’s-foot trefoil, biting stonecrop, bitter- unless it is too heavily grazed or is Acid grassland occurs on free-draining, vetch, blue fleabane, broom, buck’s-horn dominated by trees and tall scrub; nutrient-poor soils such as sandstones and plantain, chamomile, clustered clover, softer, wetter acid grassland can provide gravels. The diversity of plant and animal common centaury, common dog-violet, a source of invertebrates which are species found tends to be lower than on common rockrose, common stork’sbill, essential food for rearing chicks. other grasslands, but these species are devil’s-bit scabious, dwarf gorse, European more specialised and able to cope with a Reptiles such as adder and viviparous gorse, harebell, heath bedstraw, heath lizard are frequently found in this habitat low soil pH of between 3.5 and 6.0 and a speedwell, heather, heath spotted-orchid, and like to bask on the open, warm usually short, open vegetation structure. lady’s bedstraw, lousewort, milkworts, ground (areas with short vegetation and Acid grassland often occurs in a mosaic mouse-ear hawkweed, parsley-piert, patches of bare ground warm up faster with other habitats such as heathland, bog, pignut, rough/lesser hawkbit, saw-wort, than taller grassland areas); however, or along woodland rides. The wildflower sheep’s-bit, sheep’s sorrel, shepherd’s- they rely on nearby cover, such as species listed below provide a rough cress, slender bird’s-foot trefoil, thymes, scrub, for shelter from predators. guide as to plants which are indicative of tormentil, violets, wild strawberry, wood unimproved, species-rich acid grassland, anemone, wood sage. Many species of invertebrate lay their but botanical diversity will depend on eggs on certain species of grass or Lichens, mosses and fungi such as wax many factors including past management, wildflower and overwinter in tussocks; cap are also associated with this habitat. drainage, aspect and stocking density. areas of bare sand and soil are Often areas of acid grassland can look very particularly important as solitary bees short and “devoid” of wildlife; however Species of grass most commonly found and wasps make use of the loose, include sheep’s fescue, common bent many of these patches are rich with moss sandy soil to create burrows and lay grass, heath-grass, wavy hair-grass and and lichens, so make sure these areas are their eggs. purple moor-grass. protected too. Where ponds occur, a particular set of species has evolved to cope with the acidity of the water, such as keeled skimmer dragonfly, which breeds only in acid ponds. Choosing a management regime for your site Under-grazing, or no grazing or mowing at all, results in grassland becoming dominated by coarse grasses and scrub, with the eventual loss of the characteristic acid grassland species. Wavy hair-grass © I.Rickards Devil’s-bit scabious © I.Rickards Meadow pipit © Amy Lewis Lousewort © I.Rickards Harebells © J.Shorter Management of these grasslands is some tussocks and taller grass to remain. to do so, cutting different parts of the therefore very important to maintain their This regime will allow most plants to set grassland at different times of the year species diversity. seed and invertebrates to complete their will create a more diverse mosaic. lifecycles. Do not overgraze. If you have the option to get the site Re-creating acid grassland grazed, then this is preferable to not ● grazing in April/May can be important for It is possible to re-create acid grassland from grazing the site at all: livestock tends control of scrub since this is the period cultivated land, although this is most likely to use parts of a site in different ways when the livestock are most likely to tackle to work where the soils are thin and low in and so creates patches of taller and birch and other woody growth nutrient. Other factors such as weed burden, shorter vegetation. Mowing is a good ● light grazing from July into the autumn will availability of local seed sources, current artificial alternative but will create a very help to reduce dominance of some of the species composition, aspect, choice of seed uniform sward. Remember to factor in rank grasses (purple moor grass) and soft/ mix and drainage will all affect the outcome. rabbit grazing into your plans to manage hard rush. Further advice should be sought from Kent the site – it may be that you do not Wildlife Trust if this is an option you would need livestock. If dwarf shrubs such as like to consider. heather are present, then ensure that you rotate the cutting / grazing so as to Increasing the number of allow stands of different ages to develop. plant species Grassland which has been agriculturally Grazing - the preferred option: Rushes may need to be controlled by grazing © Kent Wildlife Trust ‘improved’ over the decades can slowly have ● for established acid grassland (where nutrient removed through grazing. Numbers the scrub and rough grasses are under of plant species may be very low and it control), exclude livestock from early Mowing (if grazing is not available): will take several years for seed to come in March to July and then graze later in the ● cut once a year in September; the later from adjacent land, assuming that you have year (August – December), depending you leave the cut, the more plants will get species-rich acid grassland nearby. Where on how wet the land is. Aim for a sward a chance to set seed. This is particularly possible, it is always preferable to allow seed height of under 5cm/2 inches but allow important if there is no grazing by livestock to come in naturally or by spreading some or rabbits taking place (or not enough). If green hay (fresh cuttings) from species-rich possible, remove the cuttings since any acid grassland. However, it is possible to dead vegetation (or ‘thatch’) will smother increase the number of plant species by seeds trying to germinate and will also introducing seed or young plants from a local allow nutrients to build up on site. source. The seed source must be of local Do not add fertilizer. provenance to ensure that the seed is of a ● if there are problems with aggressive local genetic strain and therefore well-adapted vegetation (ie. purple moor grass, birch) to the environment (see Further Reading). For Grazing by rabbits may mean that you do not need to do any grazing or cutting © Richard Burkmar then cutting earlier in the year would be small areas, buying single species seed packs beneficial (July-August). If it is practical is often cheaper than buying mixes. Further reading and references Kent Wildlife Trust Land Management Advice Series Control of ragwort, thistles and other problem plants; A brief guide to choosing livestock for conservation grazing; Scrub, its value for wildlife and how to manage it; Management of small pastures. The Grazing Animals Project (G.A.P.) Bracken and birch encroaching on acid grassland © Kent Wildlife Trust Downloadable publications and the G.A.P.
Recommended publications
  • Conservation Grazing.Pdf
    MINNESOTA WETLAND RESTORATION GUIDE CONSERVATION GRAZING TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT Document No.: WRG 6A-5 Publication Date: 1/30/2014 Table of Contents Introduction Application Other Considerations Costs Additional References INTRODUCTION Grazing by bison, elk and deer was historically a natural occurrence in grassland and shrubland plant communities in Minnesota. This grazing tended to be nomadic in nature and its intensity depended on the type of grazers, herd sizes, climate conditions, fire frequency, and the composition and structure of individual plant communities. Today conservation grazing is conducted by a variety of species including cattle, bison, horses, sheep, and goats to target specific invasive plants, or to replicate the grassland plant community structure and diversity that historically resulted from grazing. When grazing is conducted to control invasive species the intensity and duration of grazing is carefully monitored to ensure that target species are managed effectively, and that the integrity of the plant community is maintained. Most conservation grazing involves a short pulse of grazing followed by a long rest. Grazing can have benefits as well as negative impacts, so it is important to involve experienced professionals. Detailed grazing plans are an important component in the planning and implementation of prescribed grazing. Equipment that may be needed for grazing includes watering systems, electric, or barb”ed” wire fences around rotational grazing areas, moveable fencing to concentrate grazing and to ensure that areas are not overgrazed, and in some cases salt licks to concentrate animals (Tu et al. 2001). The following is a list of species commonly used for conservation grazing and their general characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Grazing Animals for Environmental Quality
    Management of grazing animals for environmental quality Etienne M. in Molina Alcaide E. (ed.), Ben Salem H. (ed.), Biala K. (ed.), Morand-Fehr P. (ed.). Sustainable grazing, nutritional utilization and quality of sheep and goat products Zaragoza : CIHEAM Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 67 2005 pages 225-235 Article available on line / Article disponible en ligne à l’adresse : -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ http://om.ciheam.org/article.php?IDPDF=6600046 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ To cite this article / Pour citer cet article -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ Etienne M. Management of grazing animals for environmental quality. In : Molina Alcaide E. (ed.), Ben Salem H. (ed.), Biala K. (ed.), Morand-Fehr P. (ed.). Sustainable grazing, nutritional utilization and quality of sheep and goat products . Zaragoza : CIHEAM, 2005. p. 225-235 (Options Méditerranéennes : Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 67) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ http://www.ciheam.org/
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Mustang Biodiversity Conservation Project Final Report
    UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Upper Mustang Biodiversity Conservation Project ATLAS ID GEF-00013971 TRAC-00013970 (formerly NEP/99/G35 and NEP/99/021) Final Report of the Terminal Evaluation Mission September 2006 Phillip Edwards (Team Leader) Rajendra Suwal Neeta Thapa ACRONYMS AND TERMS Exchange rate at the time of the TPE was US$1 to NR 71 (Nepali Rupees) ACA Anapurna Conservation Area ACAP Anapurna Conservation Area Project AHF American Himalayan Foundation APPA Appreciative Participatory Planning and Action BCP Biodiversity Conservation Plan CAMC Conservation Area Management Committee CAMOP Conservation Area Management Operation Plan CAMP Conservation Area Management Plan CAMR Conservation Area Management Regulation CBBMS Community Based Biodiversity Monitoring System CBO Community Based Organization CITES Convention on International Trade on Endangered Species CPM Co-Project Manager CRAC Community Resource Action Area Committee CRAJSC Community Resources Action Joint Sub-Committee CTF Community Trust Fund DAG Disadvantage Group DDC District Development Committee DNPWC Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation EIA Environment Impact Assessment FIT Free Independent Tourist/Trekker GEF Global Environment Facility GIS Geographic Information System GON Government of Nepal Ha. Hectares HMG His Majesty’s Government HQ Head Quarters HRD Human Resource Development ICDP Integrated Conservation Development Program ICIMOD International Center for Integrated Mountain Development IEA Initial Environmental Assessment IGA Income
    [Show full text]
  • How to Manage Different Habitats Commons Factsheet No
    How to manage different habitats Commons Factsheet No. 08 www.naturalengland.co.uk How to manage different habitats Many commons and greens are beautiful places, rich in wildlife. Because commons have a long history of being used by people, the habitats they support are relatively natural but have been shaped by human activities over the millennia (e.g. unimproved grassland, heathland, woodlands). If they are to retain their wildlife and scenery the traditional uses must either be continued, or replicated some other way (see FS3 Why does our common need to be looked after?). This factsheet summarises the characteristic features of each habitat type, together with conservation aims and management techniques for habitats frequently found on commons. Different techniques Before deciding on particular management techniques, you will want to consider their The management of habitats can vary from potential impact on the species present, simple to complex. It can often be carried the landscape, the environment, features out by volunteers with hand tools or may of archaeological and historical interest, need people with specialised training and and public access and safety (see FS5 Is our equipment. Here, the main methods you common more special than we think?, FS4 Who might use are outlined and sources of further has an interest in the common? and FS8 What information signposted. Herbicide treatments future for our commons?). Remember to plan are not discussed, as these are best used only aftercare and monitoring (see FS17 Are we if there are no other realistic options, and getting it right?). you will want specialist advice and possibly contractors to carry out the work.
    [Show full text]
  • MANAGEMENT of Natura 2000 Habitats * Semi-Natural Dry Grasslands (Festuco- Brometalia) 6210
    Technical Report 2008 12/24 MANAGEMENT of Natura 2000 habitats * Semi-natural dry grasslands (Festuco- Brometalia) 6210 The European Commission (DG ENV B2) commissioned the Management of Natura 2000 habitats. 6210 Semi-natural dry grasslands and scrubland facies on calcareous substrates ( Festuco-Brometalia ) (*important orchid sites) This document was prepared in March 2008 by Barbara Calaciura and Oliviero Spinelli, Comunità Ambiente Comments, data or general information were generously provided by: Bruna Comino, ERSAF Regione Lombardia, Italy Daniela Zaghi, Comunità Ambiente, Italy Mats O.G. Eriksson, MK Natur- och Miljökonsult HB, Sweden Monika Janisova, Institute of Botany of Slovak Academy of Sciences, Slovak Republic) Stefano Armiraglio, Museo di Scienze Naturali di Brescia, Italy Stefano Picchi, Comunità Ambiente, Italy Guy Beaufoy, EFNCP - European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism, UK Gwyn Jones, EFNCP - European Forum on Nature Conservation and Pastoralism, UK Coordination: Concha Olmeda, ATECMA & Daniela Zaghi, Comunità Ambiente 2008 European Communities ISBN 978-92-79-08326-6 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged Calaciura B & Spinelli O. 2008. Management of Natura 2000 habitats. 6210 Semi-natural dry grasslands and scrubland facies on calcareous substrates ( Festuco-Brometalia ) (*important orchid sites). European Commission This document, which has been prepared in the framework of a service contract (7030302/2006/453813/MAR/B2 "Natura 2000 preparatory actions: Management Models for Natura
    [Show full text]
  • Bryn Tip Local Nature Reserve
    BRYN TIP LOCAL NATURE RESERVE The village of Bryn is lucky enough to have its own Nature Reserve! The Reserve is popular with the residents of Bryn and visitors from further afield who come to walk their dogs, ride horses on the bridle way or take a gentle stroll whilst enjoying the wildlife and views of the surrounding countryside. The site has been used all year round and is also the starting point for the Bryn Heritage walk. This Reserve is home to hundreds of species of wildlife including flowers, fungi, invertebrates, birds, reptiles and mammals. The site was declared a Local Nature Reserve in order to protect the wildlife and preserve the landscape for people to enjoy long into the future. CONSERVATION GRAZING Over the last few years, the Countryside & Wildlife Team of the Local Authority have been working with contractors, and occasionally volunteers, to reduce the amount of invasive scrub on the site. This initial intensive management has allowed the grasses and flowering plants to flourish in those areas. However, unless the scrub is regularly managed it will become dense and eventually take over the grassland, making the site a lot less attractive to walk through. Similarly, the grassland is becoming rank and tussock and unless it is managed sensitively, much of the special wildlife will be lost. Using contractors and staff is not a sustainable long term approach for managing the Nature Reserve, even less so with the current and proposed budget cuts that the Local Authority is faced with. Conservation grazing is a more traditional, sustainable and less labour-intensive way of getting the grassland into good condition and keeping the scrub under control.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Transformations Program
    SUNY College Cortland Digital Commons @ Cortland Transformations College Archives 2014 2014 Transformations Program State University of New York at Cortland Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.cortland.edu/transformationsprograms Recommended Citation State University of New York at Cortland, "2014 Transformations Program" (2014). Transformations. 25. https://digitalcommons.cortland.edu/transformationsprograms/25 This Program is brought to you for free and open access by the College Archives at Digital Commons @ Cortland. It has been accepted for inclusion in Transformations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Cortland. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TRANSFORMATIONS A Student Research and Creativity Conference April 25, 2014 Portland Transformations: A Student Research and Creativity Conference April 25, 2014 Sperry Center SUNY Cortland Schedule of Events 12:30-1:20 p.m. Keynote Address Sperry Center, Room 105 "Multidisciplinary Solutions to 2T Century Environmental Challenges: Lessons from Sustainable Agriculture and Conservation Grazing" Gary S. Kleppel 73, Ph.D. Professor of Biological Sciences; Director of Biodiversity, Conservation & Policy Program University of Albany 1:30-2:30 p.m. Concurrent Sessions I 2:30-3 p.m. Poster Session A Sperry Center, 1st Floor Hallway 3-4 p.m. Concurrent Sessions II 4-4:30 p.m. Poster Session B Sperry Center, 1st Floor Hallway 4:30-5:30 p.m. Concurrent Sessions III Refreshments will be available 2:30-4:30 p.m. in Sperry Center, first floor food service area. PLEASE NOTE: Food and beverages are NOT allowed in classrooms. Cover design by Lauren Abbott, New Media Design major. Transformations: A Student Research and Creativity Conference is an event designed to highlight and encourage scholarship among SUNY Cortland students.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Conservation Translocation Perspectives: 2021. Case Studies from Around the Globe
    Global conservation Global conservation translocation perspectives: 2021 translocation perspectives: 2021 IUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group Global conservation translocation perspectives: 2021 Case studies from around the globe Edited by Pritpal S. Soorae IUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group (CTSG) i The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN or any of the funding organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. IUCN is pleased to acknowledge the support of its Framework Partners who provide core funding: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark; Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland; Government of France and the French Development Agency (AFD); the Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea; the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad); the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida); the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) and the United States Department of State. Published by: IUCN SSC Conservation Translocation Specialist Group, Environment Agency - Abu Dhabi & Calgary Zoo, Canada. Copyright: © 2021 IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non- commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Citation: Soorae, P. S.
    [Show full text]
  • Practical Grazing Management to Maintain Or Restore Riparian Functions and Values on Rangelands 1 2 3 Sherman Swanson , Sandra Wyman , and Carol Evans
    Volume 2, 2015 pp. 1-28 ISSN: 2331-5512 Practical Grazing Management to Maintain or Restore Riparian Functions and Values on Rangelands 1 2 3 Sherman Swanson , Sandra Wyman , and Carol Evans Keywords: riparian vegetation, livestock grazing management, grazing strategies, grazing tools, stream, meadow, fish, wildlife habitat, water quality AGROVOC terms: controlled grazing, foraging, rangelands, riparian vegetation, riparian zones Abstract Successful rangeland management maintains or restores the ability of riparian plant communities to capture sediment and stabilize streambanks. Management actions are most effective when they are focused on the vegetated streambank closest to the active channel, the greenline, where vegetation most influences erosion, deposition, landform, and water quality. Effective grazing management plans balance grazing periods, especially those with more time for re-grazing, with opportunities for plant growth by adjusting grazing timing, duration, intensity, and/or variation of use and recovery. Emphasizing either: a) schedules of grazing and recovery, or b) limited utilization level within the same growing season, is a fundamental choice which drives management actions, grazing criteria, and methods for short-term monitoring. To meet resource objectives and allow riparian recovery, managers use many tools and practices that allow rather than impede recovery. Economic decisions are based on both evaluation of investments and ongoing or variable costs, themselves justified by reduced expenses, increased production, or improved resource values. Ongoing management adjusts actions using short-term monitoring focused on chosen strategies. Long-term monitoring refocuses management to target priority areas first for needed functions, and then for desired resource values. Once riparian functions are established, management enables further recovery and resilience and provides opportunities for a greater variety of grazing strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Lowland Raised Bogs
    SCOTTISH INVERTEBRATE HABITAT MANAGEMENT Lowland raised bogs Wester Moss © Paul Kirkland / Butterfly Conservation Introduction Scottish records of the Bilberry pug moth (Pasiphila debiliata ) is from Kirkconnell Flow There has been a dramatic decline in the area of (Dumfries and Galloway) while the Bog sun- lowland raised bog habitat in the past 100 years. jumper spider ( Heliophanus dampfi ) is known The area of lowland raised bog in the UK only from two sites in the UK – one of which is retaining a largely undisturbed surface is Flanders Moss (Stirlingshire). In addition, there is estimated to have diminished by around 94% a possibility that the Bog chelifer ( Microbisium from an original 95,000 ha to 6,000 ha. In brevifemoratum ) is likely to occur in Scottish Scotland, it is estimated that the original 28,000 bogs—highlighting that there may yet be ha of lowland raised bog habitat has now unrecorded species in this important habitat diminished to a current 2,500 ha. Most of the (Legg, 2010). remaining lowland raised bog in Scotland is Support for management described in this located in the central and north-east lowlands. document is available through the Scotland Rural Historically the greatest decline has occurred Development Programme (SRDP) Rural through agricultural intensification, afforestation Development Contracts (RDC). A summary of and commercial peat extraction. Future decline is this support (at time of publication) can be found likely to be the result of the gradual desiccation of in this document. bogs, damaged by a range of drainage activities and/or a general lowering of groundwater tables. Lowland raised bogs support many rare and localised invertebrates, such as the Large heath butterfly (Coenonympha tullia ) and the 6 spotted pot beetle ( Cryptocephalus sexpunctatus ).
    [Show full text]
  • Grazing Management
    I. GRAZING MANAGEMENT The greatest diversity within California’s coastal grasslands can be seen in the forbs or wildflowers that BACKGROUND emerge in the spring following winter rains. Sites The vegetation of the Santa Cruz Mountains is comprised of a rich and with adequate management diverse assemblage of plant species. This wealth of diversity was most of non-native vegetation will evident within the grassland ecosystems that evolved under a variety of reward these efforts with disturbance pressures including fire and grazing by large herds of ungu- bountiful displays of colorful late animals, which are now mostly extinct. The flora that emerged has spring wildflowers. been described as one of the most diverse and species rich ecosystems in the United States. The arrival of early Spanish and Anglo settlers initiated a particularly dra- matic change in species composition of California grasslands, primarily as By some estimates, nearly a result of tilling the grasslands for agricultural crop production, reduction 80 percent of the vegetation of native grazing animals and introduction of cattle herds brought over cover within California from Europe and let loose on the new rangeland. This introduction of non- grasslands is exotic native plants and animals, coupled with the concurrent suppression of fire vegetation. on the landscape as the western United States was settled, resulted in the substantial replacement of the native grassland vegetation with a predom- inately exotic, annual flora. The exotic vegetation is often more competi- tive, productive, and prolific than the native plants within which it coexists, and tends to dominate and replace existing native grasses and wildflow- ers.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Treatments for Native Grassland Restoration 2013
    Evaluating Treatments for Native Grassland Restoration 2013 Evaluating Treatments for Native Grassland Restoration Jonathan Haufler, Scott Yeats, and Carolyn Mehl Ecosystem Management Research Institute P.O. Box 717, Seeley Lake, MT 59868. www.emri.org Conservation Innovation Grant NRCS 69-3A75-9-152 Evaluating Treatments for Native Grassland Restoration 2013 Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................. 1 Project Objectives ........................................................................................................ 3 Methods .......................................................................................................................... 3 Site Selection ............................................................................................................... 3 Treatments .................................................................................................................. 5 Prescribed Fire ......................................................................................................... 5 Prescribed Grazing .................................................................................................. 9 Prescribed Grazing and Prescribed Fire ................................................................ 14 Mechanical Shrub and Tree Removal ...................................................................
    [Show full text]