Idiopathic Macular Telangiectasis Type 2 and Co-Existent Diabetic Retinopathy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Jhingan et al. Int J Retin Vitr (2017) 3:50 DOI 10.1186/s40942-017-0103-x International Journal of Retina and Vitreous ORIGINAL ARTICLE Open Access Idiopathic macular telangiectasis type 2 and co‑existent diabetic retinopathy Mahima Jhingan1, Kerul Marsonia1, Dhananjay Shukla2, Philip J. Rosenfeld3 and Jay Chhablani1* Abstract Background: To study the interaction between idiopathic macular telangiectasis type 2 (MacTel2) and coexistent diabetic retinopathy (DR) during long term follow up. Methods: A retrospective chart review was done for all eyes with MacTel2 and DR with a minimum 2 years follow up. Eyes with other retinal disorders and poor quality imaging were excluded. Data collected included demographics, presenting visual acuity, systemic evaluation, treatments done, duration of follow up, and fnal visual outcomes. Results: Out of 951 patients with MacTel2, 277 patients had diabetes. Out of 277 patients, 44 eyes of 22 patients had MacTel2 coexisting with DR. Twenty-eight eyes of 14 patients were included in this study. All cases of MacTel2 were bilateral with a preponderance of women (71.42%). Mean follow up was 93.07 84.03 months with a mean random blood sugar level of 135.41 45.47 mg% at presentation. Twenty-fve (89.28%)± eyes presented with mild non-pro- liferative diabetic retinopathy.± Two (7.14%) eyes progressed in their DR staging from baseline. Stage III MacTel2 were noted in 11 (39.28)% eyes at baseline. None of these eyes progressed to stage V during follow up. Mean presenting logMAR BCVA was 0.214 0.227 which dropped to 0.399 0.301 at last visit (p 0.0005). Diabetic macula edema (DME) was not noted in any± eye till last follow up. ± = Conclusions: 12.5% of eyes with MacTel2 in diabetic patients had coexistent DR. MacTel2 led to slowly progressive visual loss irrespective of the presence of DR. Keywords: Idiopathic juxtafoveal retinal telangiectasis, Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, Proliferative diabetic retinopathy, IMT, Idiopathic macular telangiectasia, Mac Tel2 Background signifcant association with abnormal glucose tolerance Idiopathic juxtafoveal retinal telangiectasis or idiopathic has been reported by Millay et al. [3]. macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel2) is a condition Te MacTel research group [4] found a coexistence of wherein dilated telangiectatic vessels are present juxta- diabetes mellitus in 28% and hypertension in 52% in their foveally, usually temporally, and lead to retinal thinning study, which was suggestive of the fact that the vascular along with photoreceptor damage, and in some instances, stress in these conditions may add to the pathogenesis subretinal neovascularization secondary to Muller cell of MacTel2. Tey excluded all individuals who presented degeneration [1, 2]. Gass [1, 2] frst described the condi- with diabetic retinopathy and MacTel2 from their study. tion in 1968; since then considerable research has been Tere is very limited literature on natural history of done to determine its natural history and pathogen- MacTel2 coexistent with diabetic retinopathy. In a case esis. Pathogenesis of MacTel2 is still not clear; however, study by Green et al. [5], they noted that the retinal capil- lary changes in MacTel2 were similar to those observed in the diabetic and pre-diabetic states although the patient had no history of diabetes mellitus. Similar fnd- *Correspondence: [email protected] 1 Srimati Kanuri Santhamma Retina Vitreous Center, L.V. Prasad Eye ings were also reported by Diaz-Rodriguez [6] in their Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, L V Prasad Marg, Banjara Hills, study in 2005. Chew et al. [7] compared the Fundus fuo- Hyderabad, Telangana 500 034, India rescein angiography (FFA) features of leakage in MacTel2 Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s) 2017. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/ publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Jhingan et al. Int J Retin Vitr (2017) 3:50 Page 2 of 8 with diabetic macular edema and explained for the frst A comprehensive ocular examination was performed time the diference in leakage caused due to each one. in all cases. Ocular investigations included optical coher- Tey underlined the importance of imaging for this dif- ence tomography (OCT) and fuorescein angiography ferentiation for the very frst time. Shukla et al. [8] in a (FFA), wherever indicated. FFA was performed using study on the natural history of MacTel2, noted that diabe- FF450plus Fundus Camera with VISUPAC. OCT was tes was a common association (59%) though retinopathy performed using Stratus OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec), was initially absent or mild to moderate in 99% patients. RTVue-100 (Optovue) and Cirrus HD-OCT imaging However, they did not describe in detail about the natural systems (Carl Zeiss Meditec). Systemic investigations history of two diseases during the study period. included blood sugars or any relevant blood investiga- Reports from the data obtained in the MacTel database tions. Diabetes was defned as controlled if random blood [9, 10] were described as abstracts at various meetings sugar was 140 mg/dl or less [12]. A one-step change and have yet to make it to print as a full paper for our (documented by fundus photography) in severity of DR better judgement, but they all focused on the association was considered a signifcant change. IJRT 2A or MacTel2 of diabetes mellitus and MacTel2, besides proving that classifcation and staging was done according to Gass and DR progressed at a slower rate in patients with MacTel. Blodi classifcation, [1] using color fundus photographs. Tese did not describe the coexistence of DR and Mac- All images and data were analysed by single observer Tel2 as a separate entity besides showing progression. (MJ) and in the event of a confict were reassessed by the Te aim of this study was to longitudinally study the second observer (JC), who was responsible for taking the evolution of MacTel2 (treated and untreated) in the pres- fnal decision on images. ence of DR; and to assess the efect of presence of Mac- Treatment modalities employed consisted of obser- Tel2 on the progression of DR in the largest series so far. vation, laser photocoagulation of non-central diabetic macular edema (DME) in the pre OCT era, intravitreal Methods anti-VEGF agents in cases of CNVM and pan retinal A retrospective computer-assisted database search and photocoagulation in cases proliferative diabetic retinopa- chart review was carried out on all subjects with a diag- thy as per treating ophthalmologist’s discretion. Patients’ nosis of MacTel2 and diabetic retinopathy who presented follow up was also individualized, as dictated by the dis- to LV Prasad Eye Institute, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, ease severity. Repeat FFA was advised in cases of doubts Hyderabad, India, between June 1987 and November related to progression of DR or development of DME in 2015 and followed up for a minimum duration of 2 years. patients with MacTel. Inclusion criteria for our retrospective study included Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS soft- all patients who presented to us between June 1987 and ware (version 16.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), with special November 2015 and were diagnosed to have MacTel2 emphasis on the aforementioned information. p values and DR at any of their visits clinically with the aid of diag- less than 0.05 were considered as statistically signifcant. nostics such as fundus fuorescein angiography or optical coherence tomography. Eyes with presence of any other Results retinal disease or poor quality images were excluded. A total of 951 patients with a diagnosis of MacTel2 in our Eyes with any previous treatment before presentation medical records department database were identifed. for either MacTel2 or DR were excluded from the study. Out of these, 277 patients were noted to have associated Written informed consent had been obtained from all diabetes mellitus. subjects. Te institutional review board approved the Out of 951 patients with MacTel2, 277 patients had study and all the procedures adhered to the tenets of the diabetes. Out of 277 patients, 22 (12.5%) patients had Declaration of Helsinki. Te chart review followed the coexistence of diabetic retinopathy and MacTel2 at previously set out guidelines, described in earlier publi- presentation or during the follow up period, 14 patients cations [11]. among these had a minimum follow up of 2 years and Data collected included demographics, corrected were included in present study. Twenty-eight eyes of 14 distance visual acuity, details of the clinical examina- subjects fulflled the criteria to be included in the pre- tion procedure, additional investigations and systemic sent study. Ten out of the 14 (71.42%) patients in our examination, treatments performed, associated systemic study were female; the mean age at presentation was illnesses, duration of follow up in months, and fnal ana- 52.14. ± 5.52 years (range 41–59 years). Te pathol- tomical and visual outcomes. Visual acuity was measured ogy was bilateral in all the cases. Te median follow up using the Snellen’s chart and the results were subse- was 68 months with an interquartile range of 79 months quently converted to logMAR notations. (XU 120.25–XL 41.25). Te mean duration of diabetes Jhingan et al. Int J Retin Vitr (2017) 3:50 Page 3 of 8 Table 3 Progression of idiopathic macular telangiectasis mellitus in the study patients was 11.64 ± 7.056 years.