DOCSLIB.ORG

2011 CIS Consolidated Financial Statement Template Without Convenience Translation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2011 CIS Consolidated Financial Statement Template Without Convenience Translation Partnership Fund JSC Consolidated Financial Statements for the period from 28 June 2011 (date of incorporation) to 31 December 2011 Partnership Fund JSC Contents Independent Auditors’ Report 3 Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 4 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 5 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 6 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 7 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 8 Partnership Fund JSC Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as at 31 December 2011 ’000 GEL Note 2011 ASSETS Non-current assets Interests in equity accounted investees 10 235,957 Prepayments for non-current assets 2,942 Property and equipment 189 Intangible assets 2 Total non-current assets 239,090 Current assets Prepayments and other receivables 943 Cash and cash equivalents 11 2,537 Asset classified as held for sale 6 167,197 Total current assets 170,677 Total assets 409,767 EQUITY AND LIABILITIES Equity Owner contributions 12 382,730 Retained earnings 4,037 Total equity 386,767 Non-current liabilities Deferred tax liabilities 9 3,154 Total non-current liabilities 3,154 Current liabilities Loans and borrowings 13 745 Trade and other payables 15 18,013 Provisions 14 1,088 Total current liabilities 19,846 Total liabilities 23,000 Total equity and liabilities 409,767 4 The consolidated statement of financial position is to be read in conjunction with the notes to, and forming part of, the consolidated financial statements set out on pages 8 to 36. Partnership Fund JSC Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity for the period from 28 June 2011(date of incorporation) to 31 December 2011 Owner contributions Retained Total ’000 GEL (note 12) earnings equity Balance at 28 June 2011 (date of incorporation) - - - Total comprehensive income for the period Profit for the period - 4,037 4,037 Transactions with owners, recorded directly in equity Owner contributions, net of tax of GEL 3,439 thousand (see note 9) 382,730 - 382,730 Balance at 31 December 2011 382,730 4,037 386,767 6 The consolidated statement of changes in equity is to be read in conjunction with the notes to, and forming part of, the consolidated financial statements set out on pages 8 to 36. Partnership Fund JSC Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the period from 28 June 2011(date of incorporation) to 31 December 2011 28 June 2011 (date of incorporation) ’000 GEL Note to 31 December 2011 Cash flows from operating activities Profit before income tax 3,752 Adjustments for: Depreciation and amortisation 5 Share of results of equity accounted investees (net of income tax) (5,868) Net finance income (83) Cash used in operating activities before changes in working capital (2,194) and provisions Change in prepayments and other receivables (192) Change in trade and other payables 998 Change in provisions 1,088 Net cash used in operating activities (300) Cash flows from investing activities Interest received 15 Acquisition of property and equipment (194) Acquisition of intangible assets (2) Acquisition of interests in equity accounted investees (193) Net cash used in investing activities (374) Cash flows from financing activities Proceeds from owner contributions 2,480 Proceeds from borrowings 731 Net cash from financing activities 3,211 Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 2,537 Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period - Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period 11 2,537 During the period from 28 June 2011 (date of incorporation) to 31 December 2011 the Fund received non-cash capital contributions in the form of interests in investees and other current and non-current assets. Details of the transactions are set out in the note 12 of these consolidated financial statements. 7 The consolidated statement of cash flows is to be read in conjunction with the notes to, and forming part of, the consolidated financial statements set out on pages 8 to 36. Partnership Fund JSC Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period from 28 June 2011(date of incorporation) to 31 December 2011 1. Background (a) Organisation and operations Partnership Fund JSC (the “Fund”) is a joint stock company domiciled in Georgia. The consolidated financial statements include financial statements of the Fund and its subsidiaries (together referred to as the “Group” and individually as “Group entities”) and the Group’s interest in associates and jointly controlled entities. The Group entities are Georgian joint stock and limited liability companies as defined in the “Law of Georgia on Entrepreneurs” and are disclosed in note 20. The Fund was established on 28 June 2011 as a wholly state-owned enterprise following the “Law of Georgia on Partnership Fund JSC” as of 8 April 2011. The Fund is the first specialised public sector entity established by the State of Georgia, accountable to the President of Georgia and governed by the Supervisory Board chaired by the Prime Minister of Georgia. It was created to support investments in less developed industries of the Georgian economy and create new employment opportunities in the country. The Group’s principal activity is to provide equity and debt financing, and guarantees to private and public sector companies operating in Georgia with priority for projects in the energy, agriculture, manufacturing and real estate sectors. The main sources of income are expected to come from dividends and guarantee fees. The capital of the Fund was formed by the contribution from the Government of Georgia of its 24% interests in Georgian Oil and Gas Corporation JSC and Georgian Railway LLC, both of which are state-owned monopoly companies operating in the gas distribution and transportation sectors respectively. In addition, 100% interests in Nenska JSC and Tbilisi Logistics Center LLC were contribution to the capital of the Fund by the Government of Georgia (see note 20). The Fund’s registered office is 15 Queen Tamar Avenue, 0112, Tbilisi, Georgia. As at 31 December 2011 the Fund is wholly owned by the State of Georgia represented by the Government of Georgia (the “Parent”). Related party transactions are detailed in note 19. (b) Group structure As at 31 December 2011 the Fund has interests in the following entities: 31 December 2011 Country of incorporation and Name operation Ownership/voting Principal activities Construction and operation of Nenskra JSC Georgia 100% hydro-power plant Tbilisi Logistics Center LLC Georgia 100% Servicing food commodities Borjomi Likani International JSC Georgia 50% Hotel operations Georgian Oil and Gas Oil and gas sale, extraction and Corporation JSC Georgia 24% exploration and rent of pipelines Georgian Railway LLC Georgia 24% Railroad transportation 8 Partnership Fund JSC Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the period from 28 June 2011(date of incorporation) to 31 December 2011 (c) Georgian business environment The Group’s operations are located in Georgia. Consequently, the Group is exposed to the economic and financial markets of Georgia which display characteristics of an emerging market. The conflict between Georgia and the Russian Federation has created additional uncertainty in the environment. The legal, tax and regulatory frameworks continue development, but are subject to varying interpretations and frequent changes which together with other legal and fiscal impediments contribute to the challenges faced by entities operating in Georgia. The consolidated financial statements reflect management’s assessment of the impact of the Georgian business environment on the operations and the financial position of the Group. The future business environment may differ from management’s assessment. 2. Basis of preparation (a) Statement of compliance These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRSs”). (b) Basis of measurement The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except that interests in investees contributed by the owners and assets classified as held for sale are measured at fair value and fair value less costs to sell, respectively, at initial recognition. (c) Functional and presentation currency The national currency of Georgia is the Georgian Lari (“GEL”), which is the Group’s functional currency and the currency in which these consolidated financial statements are presented. All financial information presented in GEL has been rounded to the nearest thousand, except when otherwise indicated. (d) Use of estimates and judgments The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRSs requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from those estimates. Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. Information about significant areas of estimation uncertainty and critical judgments in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognised in the consolidated financial statements is included in the following notes: • Note 6 - estimating the fair value less costs to sell for asset classified as held for sale • Note 10 - estimating the fair value of interests in investees contributed by the owner on initial recognition Information about assumptions and estimation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant Expedition to the Republic of Georgia
    PLANT EXPEDITION TO THE REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA — CAUCASUS MOUNTAINS AUGUST 15 - SEPTEMBER 11, 2010 SPONSORED BY THE DANIEL F. AND ADA L. RICE FOUNDATION PLANT COLLECTING COLLABORATIVE (PCC) Chicago Botanic Garden Missouri Botanical Garden The Morton Arboretum New York Botanical Garden University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum 1 Table of Contents Summary 3 Georgia’s Caucasus 4-6 Expedition, Expedition Route & Itinerary 7-10 Collaboration 11 Observations 12-13 Documentation 14 Institutional review 14-15 Acknowledgements 16 Maps of the Republic of Georgia and PCC member locations 17 Photo Gallery Collecting 18-19 Collections 20-24 Seed Processing 25 Landscapes 26-29 Transportation 30 Dining 31 People 32-33 Georgia Past and Present 34 Georgia News 35-36 Appendix I – Germplasm Collections Listed by Habit Appendix II – Germplasm Collections Listed Alphabetically Appendix III – Weed Risk Assessment Appendix IV – Field Notes 2 Summary With generous support from the Daniel F. and Ada L. Rice Foundation, Galen Gates and the Plant Collecting Collaborative (PCC) team made outstanding progress through an expedition in the Republic of Georgia. On this recent trip into the Caucasus Moun- tains, a record was set for the most collections made on any Chicago Botanic Garden and PCC expedition to date. The trip, door to door, was 26 days with field collecting most days; nearly every night‘s activity included seed cleaning. We made three hundred collections at 60 sites. Most were seeds from 246 types of trees, shrubs, and perennials, 14 were bulb taxa and four were in the form of perennial roots. Remarkably, 53 taxa are new to U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Brand Success Evaluation MAIA SETURI Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
    Brand Success Evaluation MAIA SETURI Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia Abstract: It is very important for the company to use the trademark and manage them effectively in the working conditions on the competitive market. Trademark (Brand) obsesses the consumer's attention, attracts them and in case of customer’s satisfaction ensures their loyalty. But the brand can’t be considered in unchanged way, even strong and successful brand is evolving and changes over the time. The goal of my research was to study customers’ attitude toward "Borjomi" on Georgian market and to assess the weaknesses, which might be linked to the development of the brand and its further success’s based on the results of the research. There is not still well developed and thought the largest importance of branding in the business of companies commercial success, for example, non-existent work experience of branding in the past. Keywords: Trademark, market, brand, brand effectiveness, branding, brand image, marketing, consumer, loyality, competitive market. Introduction It is very important for the company to use the trademark and manage them effectively in the working conditions on the competitive market. Trademark (Brand) obsesses the consumer's attention, attracts them and in case of customer’s satisfaction ensures their loyalty. “Consumer assesses the identical products depending on how it is branded"(1). But the brand can’t be considered in unchanged way, even strong and successful brand is evolving and changes over the time. Creating a brand is an important and significant first step towards its successful, hard way. Research of the issues related to the brand creation and development is one of the actual (urgent) topics, which is discussed in this paper on the example of Georgian mineral water "Borjomi".
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Historical and Environmental Route
    Georgia Historical and Environmental route: Samtskhe - Javakheti 1. Depart from Bavra (Armenia) and arrival to Samtshke-Javakheti Transboundary protected area and Ramsar site 2. Kumudo Dome Church, 964 AD., Kurmodo Village (Akhalkalaki Municipality) 3. Vardzia Cave City, XII-XIII Century, Tmogvi Village (Aspindza Municipality) 4. Kertvisi Castle 5. Sapara Monastery, X; XII-XIV Century, Greli Village (Akhaltsikhe Municipality) 6. Atskuri Virgin Mary Church, Middle Centuries, Atskuri Village 7. Atskuri Prision, X-XIV Century, Atskuri Village (Akhaltsikhe Municipality) 8. Vale Virgin Mary Church, X Century, Vale Village (Akhaltsikhe Municipality) 9. Akhaltsike Archeological Museum 10. Green Monastery Church, IX-XIV Century, Likani Village (Borjomi Municipality) 11. Tabatskuri Red Church, Middle Centuries, Tabatskuri Village 12. Ktsia-Tabtskuri Proteced Areas 13. Timotesubani, 1204 A.D., Timotesubani Village (Borjormi Municipality) 14. Kharagauli National Park (Borjormi Municipality) 15. Ubisa Monastery, IX- XII Century, Ubisa Village (Kharagauli Municipality) 16. Tsromi cathedral, 626-635 A.D., Tsromi Village (Kashuri municipality) 17. Tskhisis’natlismcemli Church, 1002 A.D., Tskhisi Village (Kashuri municipality) 18. Kashuri (Nazuki bakers) (Tkibuli municipality) Imereti 19. Bagrati Cathedral, 1003 A.D., Ukimerioni Hill, Kutaisi 20. Gelati Monastery, XII Century, Gelati Village (UNESCO Cultural Heritage site) (Tkiuli Municipality) 21. Martyr’s Monastery, VII-XIX Century, Mitsameta Village 22. Vani Archeological Museum (Kolkheti expedition) 23. Sataplia and Promethe cave protected area Dinosaurs path 24. Tsivi and Tsia archeological excavation Samegrelo-Zemo Svaneti 25. Zugdidi City 26. Proposed UNESCO Natural World Heritage and Ramsar sites - Colchis - Country of Argonauts (Medea and Aieti), habitat of Phasianus colchicus NATURE 2000 and Emerald Network species and habitat 27. Martvili monastery, VII Century, Martveli (Martveli Muncipality) 28.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Project Catalogue September 2020
    INVESTINGEORGIA.ORG INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES 2020 A PLEASURE DOING BUSINESS Located in the Caucasus region, on the coast of The country's ambitious objectives to be one of the Black Sea, Georgia is geographically well the best investment locations on the world map positioned as a gateway between Europe and are reflected in number of different Asia. The country is perfectly situated for easy well-recognized international rankings, where access to most major European, Central Asian Georgia maintains strong positions. For and Middle Eastern markets and has free trade example, Georgia holds 7th position in World agreements (FTAs) with most of them. In this Bank’s 2020 “Ease of Doing Business Index”. way, Georgia already boasts majority of the Foreign-owned businesses make significant preconditions required to become a regional contribution to the Georgian economy and its financial and business centre. great position for deepening links between Europe and Asia will further raise country’s Today, Georgia has a strong investment offer - productivity - via the transfer of technology, by it has liberal and free market oriented economic increased export-oriented investments and policy, access to 2.3 billion consumer market stronger regional competition positions. through its solid FTA network including both EU and China, educated, skilled and competitively Georgia is a great destination for companies priced workforce, 6 types of low and flat taxes, from all around the world, whether it’s to enter significantly decreased number of licenses and the regional market itself, the European market, permissions, well developed, integrated and or the broader Asian markets. It is a country full multimodal transport infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • As the Museum of Decorative-Applied Arts
    Terms of Reference Preparation of Museography for the “New Cavalry House” (Cavalry Corps) as the Museum of Decorative-Applied Arts Museum Exposition Concept, Interior Design and Management Plan 1: INTRODUCTION The Municipal Development Fund of Georgia (hereinafter the employer) is a legal entity of public law whose purpose is to mobilize financial resources from donors including international and Georgian financial institutions, in order to make them available for investments in local infrastructure and services, while simultaneously helping local self-governments in strengthening their institutional and financial capacity. The MDF programs envisage the implementation of various projects including the Third Regional Development Project financed by the World Bank and the Government of Georgia (GoG). The aim of the project is to promote tourism development in Mtskheta-Mtianeti and Samtskhe-Javakheti Regions. Site location and description The Decorative-Applied Arts Museum (“New Cavalry House”) is located in Borjomi Municipality, in the city of Borjomi. Borjomi is outstanding among the Georgian Spa resorts and owns the origin of the mineral water brand, “Borjomi”. Borjomi Gorge has great and significant resources and potentials for the development of cultural tourism. Besides the richness in culture and the presence of relevant monuments of cultural heritage, the natural landscape is of incomparable beauty. The extremely favourable location of Borjomi town and the numerous places of interest (among which area: Likani complex, Borjomi-Kharagauli National Park, alpine ski resort Bakuriani, Vardzia, Akhaltsikhe Rabati and Historical Museum of Samtskhe-Javakheti, Abastumani resort) make it an important tourist destination. Borjomi has a big advantage over other tourist destinations: it is located next to the National Borjomi-Kharagauli Park, the largest National Park in Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Opportunities in Hospitality & Real Estate in Georgia 2019
    HOSPITALITY & INVESTMENT CLIMATE & 1 OPPORERTUANLITIES ES IN GETAORGITEA 2019 GEORGIA COUNTRY OVERVIEW Area: 69,700 sq. km Population: 3.7 mln GDP 2018: USD 16.2 billions Life expectancy at birth 2017: 73.5 years GDP real growth rate 2018: 4.7 % Georgian GDP CAGR 2013-2018 (GEL): 4 % Literacy: 99.8 % GDP per capita 2018: USD 4346 Capital: Tbilisi Inflation rate (December) 2018 (Y-o-Y): 1.5% Currency (code): Lari (GEL) Total Public Debt to Nominal GDP (%) 2018: 42.2% INVESTMENT CLIMATE & 2 OPPORTUNITIES IN GEORGIA ADVANTAGES OF INVESTMENT CLIMATE IN GEORGIA A politically stable investment destination EHƒEKGPVRro-business and corruption-free government Free trade agreement with 2.3 billion markets Competitive cost of labor and energy Entry gate between Europe and Asia Stable Macroeconomic situation and solid sovereign balance sheet 5KORNGNQYCPFGHƒEKGPVVCZCVKQP 7th easiest country to do business in (World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Report 2019) 6th safest country in the world (Numbeo’U%TKOG+PFGZ BB BB Stable Ba2 Stable INVESTMENT CLIMATE & 3 OPPORTUNITIES IN GEORGIA WHY INVEST IN HOSPITALITY & REAL ESTATE IN GEORGIA Continuous Increase of International No Real Estate Ownership Restrictions Visitors – 21% average annual growth of Governmental Incentives Available Visa Free Regime with 98 Countries Unique Nature and Culture Various Types of Resorts and Investment Opportunities INVESTMENT CLIMATE & 4 OPPORTUNITIES IN GEORGIA NUMBER OF INTERNATIONAL TRAVELERS HAS BEEN GROWING RAPIDLY 10 9 8.7 8 7.9 7 6.3 6.7 6 5.7 5.9 5 4.7 +10% 4 3 2 1 0
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Progress Report Georgia Communities
    QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT GEORGIA COMMUNITIES EMPOWERED FOR LOCAL DECISION-MAKING APRIL TO JUNE 2005 Prepared for Prepared by William E. Krause The Urban Institute Georgia Communities Empowered for Local Decision-Making United States Agency for International Development Cooperative Agreement No. 114-A-00-04-00131-00 THE URBAN INSTITUTE 2100 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 (202) 833-7200 July 2005 www.urban.org UI Project 07755-000-00 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Highlights ..............................................................................................................................................2 II. Progress of Major Activities...................................................................................................................3 III. Deliverables and Reports....................................................................................................................12 IV. Problems or Delays Affecting Performance ........................................................................................13 V. Work Planned for Next Reporting Period ............................................................................................13 VI. Specific Action Requested ..................................................................................................................15 QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT APRIL TO JUNE 2005 GEORGIA COMMUNITIES EMPOWERED FOR LOCAL DECISION-MAKING Cooperative Agreement No.: 114-A-00-04-00131-00 Date of Issuance: September 23, 2004 Amount Obligated: $5,000,000 Total Potential
    [Show full text]
  • Borjomi Local Development Strategy
    Borjomi Local Development Strategy 2016‐2019 June 1, 2016 BORJOMI LOCAL ACTION GROUP www.borjomilag.ge The development of this Local Development Strategy has been financially support by the European Union under the ENPARD project “A New Approach for Rural Development in Georgia” implemented by Mercy Corps. Technical support was provided by the Austrian Federal Institute for Less Favoured and Mountainous Areas (BABF), with additional input from the project partners, Angus Council in Scotland and Borjomi Municipality. 2 Contents 1. Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 4 2. General Overview of Borjomi Municipality ..................................................................................... 5 3. Analysis of the Development Needs ............................................................................................... 6 3.1 Description of the region ......................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2 Socio‐economic situation ................................................................................................ 7 3.1.3 Education and qualification ............................................................................................. 8 3.1.4 Agriculture ....................................................................................................................... 8 3.1.5 Bio‐diversity ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Valuing Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity: Experience and Approaches Taken in Georgia
    Valuing Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity: Experience and Approaches Taken in Georgia Workshop for Eastern Europe and Central Asia on Valuation and Incentive Measures Tbilisi Georgia 29 -31 May 2012. Prepared by: Malkhaz Adeishvili 1 Valuing Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity: Experience and Approaches Taken in Georgia Part 1: Economic valuation studies undertaken in Georgia and used approaches Part 2: Basics of Sector Scenario Analysis (SSA) Part 3: Results of recent UNDP/GEF and WWF economic valuation studies: Economic Valuation of the Contribution of PA Ecosystem Services to Economic Growth and Peoples’ Wellbeing in Georgia 2 Part 1: Economic Valuation Studies Undertaken in Georgia and Used Approaches • World Bank studies (2000) exploring the revenue generation potential of the national parks to be established under the GEF funded Protected Areas Development Project: - Contingent Valuation Survey among Georgian City Dwellers: Attitudes, Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Biodiversity Conservation. Tijen Arin, World Bank. Manon Circe, Tecsult Inc. Georgian Opinion Research Business International (GORBI). (2000); - Tourist Preferences for the Establishment of National Parks in Georgia, Survey Results for Expatriates Residing in Tbilisi, Georgia. Tecsult International Inc. (2000). • Methodology used – Contingent Valuation Method: the respondents were asked for their maximum willingness to pay (WTP) for access to national parks (e.g. the highest entrance fee that they would pay ) as well as WTP for nature conservation in Georgia. 3 Part 1: Economic Valuation Studies Undertaken in Georgia and Used Approaches Some findings of these studies: • Contingent Valuation Survey among Georgian City Dwellers (2000): - The recreational value that Georgian city dwellers would derive from visiting national parks was estimated at 2.7 million GEL (1.7 mln USD) annually.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SFG2732 Public Disclosure Authorized THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STARTEGIES OF SAMTSKHE-JAVAKHETI AND MTSKETA-MTIANETI Public Disclosure Authorized Third Regional Development Project Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized December, 2016 Abbreviations GNTA Georgia National Tourism Administration EIA Environnemental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan RDS Regional Development Strategy RTDS Regional Tourism Development Strategy MDF Municipal Development Fund of Georgia MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia MoCMP Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection MESD Ministry of Economic and Sustaineble Developmnet NACHP National Agency for Cultural Heritage Protection PIU Project Implementation Unit RDP Regional Development Project SECHSA Strategic Environmental, Cultural Heritage and Social Assessment WB World Bank Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 THIRD REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (RDP III) ..................................................... 12 1.2 REGIONAL AND SECTORAL CONTEXT: RDS AND RTDS FOR SAMTSKHE- JAVAKHETI AND MTSKHETA-MTIANETI REGIONS ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Borjomi: Rebuilding a Brand Icon in Russia
    IMD-5-0682 I N T E R N A T I O N A L 24.04.2006 BORJOMI: REBUILDING A BRAND ICON IN RUSSIA Research Associate Mope We have to create this category and own it! Ogunsulire prepared this case under the supervision of Jacques Fleury hit the table for emphasis, but his two colleagues Professor Dominique Turpin remained skeptical. Marianna Glotova, group marketing director as a basis for class discussion for Georgian Glass and Mineral Water (GGMW), barely waited rather than to illustrate either for her CEO to finish before breaking in: effective or ineffective handling of a business situation. People will see it as tampering with their Borjomi! They will not like it; remember the example of “new Coke.” But Fleury disagreed. On the contrary, Russians will listen to us because we are Borjomi! Vladimir Ashurov, a partner in Salford Capital Partners, owners of GGMW, looked from one to the other in silence. The heated debate had been raging for over two hours, but no-one had noticed the time passing. As a Russian, Ashurov understood Glotova’s visceral reaction to any potential dilution of the Borjomi brand. One of Russia’s oldest mineral water brands, Borjomi was also one of its best-known and loved. Though a finance specialist, Ashurov was as passionate as Glotova about marketing the Borjomi brand. However, he was also a venture capitalist and could clearly see the opportunity Fleury identified. The challenge before Borjomi was huge. Having grown rapidly in the past three years, the company now wanted to triple its revenues in Russia further from $50 in 2005 to about $155 million in the next three years.
    [Show full text]
  • Organized Crime and Corruption in Georgia
    Organized Crime and Corruption in Georgia Georgia is one of the most corrupt and crime-ridden nations of the former Soviet Union. In the Soviet period, Georgians played a major role in organized crime groups and the shadow economy operating throughout the Soviet Union, and in the post-Soviet period, Georgia continues to be an important source of inter- national crime and corruption. Important changes have been made since the Rose Revolution in Georgia to address the organized crime and pervasive corruption. This book, based on extensive original research, surveys the most enduring aspects of organized crime and corruption in Georgia and the most important reforms since the Rose Revolution. Endemic crime and corruption had a devastating effect on government and everyday life in Georgia, spurring widespread popular discontent that culminated with the Rose Revolution in 2003. Some of the hopes of the Rose Revolution have been realized, though major challenges lie ahead as Georgia confronts deep-seated crime and corruption issues that will remain central to political, economic, and social life in the years to come. Louise Shelley is a Professor in the School of International Service of Amer- ican University. She is the founder and director of the Terrorism, Transna- tional Crime and Corruption Center (Traccc). She specializes in transnational crime, the relationship between terrorism and transnational crime, human trafficking and smuggling. Her particular regional focus is the former Soviet Union. She is the author of Policing Soviet Society (Routledge, 1996), and has published numerous articles and book chapters on different aspects of crime, corruption and terrorism. Erik R.
    [Show full text]