DOCSLIB.ORG

Application Reference No

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Application Reference No COMMITTEE REPORT Application 11/02798/VARY Reference Site Address Gorcott Hall, Gorcott Hill, Beoley, Redditch Proposed removal of condition 2 of planning permission 09/01025/FUL which limited permission for mixed use single residence, venue for weddings, events and dinner parties to a Proposals temporary 2 year period. Also proposed variation of condition 3 which limited the number of events to 12 per year to allow up to a maximum of 18 per year. Case Officer Lucy Hammond Presenting Officer Tamasine Swan Applicant Mrs Alison Foxon Ward Member(s) Cllr Kerridge Parish Council Mappleborough Green Reason for Referral Support from Ward Member to Committee Recommendation REFUSE 1. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL Planning permission is sought to remove condition 2 from a previously approved planning permission (granting consent for a change of use of a single residence to a mixed use of single residence and venue for weddings, events and dinner parties); condition 2 limited permission to a temporary 2 year period. This application also proposes to vary the wording of condition 3, which limited the number of events to 12 per year to allow up to a maximum of 18 per year. 2. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND SURROUNDINGS (INCLUDING RELEVANT PLANNING CONSTRAINTS) The application site is located within the West Midlands Green Belt, approximately 1.5km north of the village of Mappleborough Green. It lies adjacent to the A435 at a point at which it is a dual carriageway. The site is land locked on all sides with access and egress directly onto the A435. Gorcott Hall is a Grade II* listed building with associated barns and outbuildings, some of which are Grade II listed. The site is well screened from public view by existing mature planting to the site boundaries and has no neighbouring properties on any side. 3. HISTORY/BACKGROUND Reference Number Proposal Decision and date 09/01025/FUL Change of use of existing buildings Refused 21.01.2010 from a single residence to a mixed use Allowed at appeal 17.12.2010 of single residence and venue for weddings, events and dinner parties. 05/03098/FUL Conversion of outbuildings to form Approved 07.02.2006 residential accommodation, storage and garaging together with new link to house. 05/03099/LBC Conversion of barns and new link to Approved 07.02.2006 house with single storey extension. 4. RELEVANT POLICY CONTEXT The Development Plan Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) Scheme is not of regional significance Warwickshire Structure Plan 1996 - 2011 (Saved Policies) None relevant to this application Stratford-on-Avon District Local Plan Review 1996-2011 (saved policies) PR.1 Landscape and Settlement Character PR.2 Green Belt DEV.1 Layout and Design DEV.4 Access DEV.5 Car Parking DEV.8 Energy Conservation COM.17 Rural Employment CTY.1 Control over Development Other Material Considerations Central Government Guidance PPS1 Delivering Sustainable Development PPG2 Green Belt Draft National Planning Policy Framework Supplementary Planning Guidance and Supplementary Planning Documents District Design Guide Other Documents Corporate Strategy Draft Core Strategy Other Legislation Human Rights Act 1998 Equalities Act 2010 Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act 2006 5. APPLICANT’S COMMENTS Covering letter Additional information/plan regarding visibility splays at access 6. PARISH COUNCIL No representations (25.01.2012) 7. WARD MEMBERS The comments made by the Ward Member(s) have been summarised by the case officer. Councillor Kerridge Support: [1] Seems to fit Stratford policy with regard to business development and has no draw backs (04.01.2012) [2] Would like to see a resolution of condition 4 of the original permission regarding improvements to the visibility. Improving road safety would increase the likelihood of continuing support for the application (01.03.2012) 8. THIRD PARTY REPRESENTATIONS None 9. CONSULTATIONS WCC Highways Objection on the grounds of the existing access being inadequate (06.01.2012) WCC Museum (Ecology) No comment – not an ecological issue (19.01.2012) 10. ASSESSMENT OF THE KEY ISSUES Principle of Development Notwithstanding the fact that the Local Planning Authority refused the previous planning application (ref.09/01025/FUL), the principle of development was established through the subsequent appeal which was allowed by the Planning Inspector. This permitted the change of use of some of the buildings on site to facilitate weddings and other events. However, the Inspector imposed conditions amongst which was one granting only a temporary 2 year consent and the other placed a restriction on the number of events that could take place annually at the site. Since it is the removal and variation of these conditions that is sought through the submission of this current application I consider the principle of development continues to be acceptable with regard to saved policy PR.2 in respect of Green Belt and the assessment of the relevant key issues, particularly relating to highway safety are addressed below in the following sections. Due to the property being bounded by the A4023 Coventry Highway to the south and the A435 to the east, I consider the local highway network would be capable of accommodating the proposed levels of traffic from the uses now in operation at the site. Therefore, with regard to sustainability, I consider the proposal is acceptable. Impact on highway safety The only vehicular access into and out of the site is from the slip road providing access onto the A435 from the A4023. The western property boundary is made up of a number of large trees, partially reducing visibility along the slip road when exiting the site onto the A435. Condition 4 of the permission allowed at appeal required details to be forthcoming of improvement works to be carried out to the trees along the frontage to improve visibility. Even with such works carried out it would still result in substandard visibility splays for a dual carriageway road with a de-restricted speed limit. However no such details were forthcoming and the condition was never discharged. The use has been operating at the site for over a year now and it is only throughout the life of this application, at my request, that details of improvement works to the visibility at the front of the site have been submitted. The applicant states that such works have already been carried out and a recent site visit would confirm that this is correct, although it appears the works were carried out some time ago without the condition having been discharged. Unfortunately the Inspector did not provide reasons for the imposition of conditions 2 and 3 (with regard to the temporary consent and limit on number of events). Nevertheless, it is my opinion that these conditions were considered necessary to ensure that any impact on highway safety was regulated and kept to a minimum. The Highways Authority previously objected on the grounds that the existing access was inadequate to support the intensification which would result from the proposed use. Although the Inspector disagreed with the comments from the Highways Authority the imposition of conditions 2 and 3 at least managed the proposed development with respect to impact on highway safety. However, since this application now wishes to further increase the number of vehicle trips generated and moreover remove the temporary consent altogether which would result in a permanent permission, if allowed, the Highways Authority have maintained their original objection for the same reasons as before. I have no reason to disagree with the comments made by the Highways Authority. Just because there are no records of any accidents at this location since permission was granted does not, in my opinion, mean that the access, its relationship with the A435 and proximity to the slip road and junction with the A4023 is any more adequate or likely to result in less vehicular conflicts than when previously assessed in 2010. Furthermore, in view of the fact that the required information in respect of the visibility splays was never forthcoming at the appropriate time and the use has been in operation since in breach of condition 4 I do not consider there are any material reasons or indeed any other benefits resulting from the development which would outweigh the potential harm caused to highway safety. For these reasons I maintain that the removal of condition 2, thus allowing a permanent permission, and the variation of condition 3 to allow an increase in the number of annual events from 12 to 18 would be in conflict with saved policy DEV.4 of the Local Plan Review which expects all development to have satisfactory regard to access arrangements and ensure that a proposal will not cause unacceptable harm to highway safety. NERC The nature of the proposals does not raise any ecological issues or concerns. There is therefore no objection on ecological grounds. It is the duty of the Authority to have regard to conserving biodiversity, including in relation to living organisms or types of habitat, restoring or enhancing a population or habitat under the Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act 2006. I am satisfied that appropriate regard has been given to the Natural Environment and Rural Communities (NERC) Act 2006. Conclusions The principle of development, i.e. the use of buildings for weddings and other events, was established through the appeal being allowed by the Inspector which followed the Council’s refusal of 09/01025/FUL. Condition 2 was imposed granting a 2 year temporary consent while condition 3 limited the number of annual events to no more than 12 days. The current application seeks to remove condition 2 which would result in a permanent permission and vary condition 3 so that the number of annual events allowed to take place can be increased from 12 to 18 days.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vebraalto.Com
    Approx 49 acres (20.00 ha) In 3 Lots, Gorcott Hill, Redditch, B98 9ER/B98 9HN GUIDE PRICE £8,000 - 10,000 Per Acre (+Fees) For sale by Public Auction, subject to prior sale, reserve and conditions at 6.30 pm on Tuesday 29th September 2020 at The View, Hill Farm Marina, Stratford Road, Wootton Wawen, Warwickshire, B95 6DE. 49 Acres (20.00 ha) of Land will be offered in 3 Lots; Lot 1 - 35.74 Acres (14.46 ha) of Land Lot 2 - 9.18 Acres (3.71 ha) of Land Lot 3 - 4.08 Acres (1.65 ha) of Land Large blocks of mature woodland/amenity land in the South Midlands area only occasionally come onto the open market. The opportunity now presented gives buyers the chance to purchase a useful acreage of mixed deciduous woodland which has been managed for timber production. The trees include good stands of oak with some ash and scots pine with an understory of bluebells and wild flowers in the Spring together with a rich diversity of birdlife. Originally part of the Skilts Estate (The bulk of which was sold in October 1948) there is an area extending to some 9.51 Acres (3.85 ha) of newly planted mixed woodland including sycamore, oak, alder etc. which will, in future years attract additional grant payments (further details from the auctioneer). The majority is South and South/East facing on the slopes of Gorcott Hill, easily accessed from the A435 dual carriageway. Lying some 14 miles South of Birmingham City Centre with excellent road communications via the M42 Motorway Junction 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Boundary Growth of Redditch Borough
    Housing Growth Background Document January 2013 Introduction Bromsgrove District Council and Redditch Borough Council jointly consulted on cross boundary growth options in 2010. Since then changes to the planning system have meant that both Councils need to work together to find a solution to meet the growth needs of Redditch which cannot all be sustainably accommodated within the Borough. The Councils have agreed to work together to find land within Bromsgrove District, in the vicinity of Redditch Borough, to sustainably accommodate this additional housing growth. This is a non-technical document that has been written to explain how a location has been identified by officers of both authorities to meet this cross-boundary growth. For this reason, technical information is not included but cross-referenced or results summarised in the relevant paragraphs. This document is structured to reflect the process of site selection and the following provides a summary of what each chapter will cover: Chapter Summary 1. Background To explain why cross boundary growth is necessary and how the growth requirements have been determined. This will cover the legislation, planning policies and evidence documents that are relevant to this cross boundary growth issue. 2. Strategic Objectives To identify the Strategic Objectives which site(s) will need to contribute to. 3. Methodology To explain how the site selection process was carried out and the sources of information. 4. Area Assessment Principles To identify the principles that will be used in the area assessment process. 5. Broad Area Appraisal To identify broad area(s) that are more appropriate for accommodating the development in accordance with relevant criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Redditch Gateway, Land Adjacent to the A4023, Coventry Highway, Redditch, Worcestershire
    Name of Expiry Date Plan Ref. Applicant Proposal _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Redditch Hybrid application comprising: Outline planning 31.10.2017 17/00701/OUT Gateway application (with matters of appearance, Infrastructure landscaping, layout, scale and details of internal Ltd circulation routes reserved) for the development on a phased basis of 32ha of employment land for business/industrial uses (Use Classes B1, B2, B8). The development shall include: landscaping, parking, associated infrastructure, utilities, drainage (including SUDS) and ground engineering works; and Full planning application for Phase 1 Ground Engineering works, and details of means of access to the site from the A4023. Redditch Gateway, Land Adjacent to the A4023, Coventry Highway, Redditch, Worcestershire RECOMMENDATION: That DELEGATED POWERS be granted to the Head of Planning and Regeneration to GRANT planning permission subject to the applicant entering into a suitable legal mechanism to secure the following: 1. £200,000.00 to be paid on first occupation and held for a period of 15 years from its receipt in the form of a bond and management arrangement to support HGV routing. 2. biodiversity offset scheme for each phase of development and biodiversity monitoring contribution. 1.0 Consideration and Determination of Cross Boundary Application 1.1 Three identical applications have been submitted which include land within three LPA boundaries (Stratford, Bromsgrove and Redditch). 1.2 The consideration of the impacts of a development proposal are not altered by political boundaries and cannot be considered in isolation. Members need to consider the application as a whole, (not just that part of the development within its own administrative boundary) and come to a decision based upon that consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • The Place for Business at the Heart of England
    SoADC Industrial and Economic Strategy 2018-2023 The Place for Business at the Heart of England Draft Local Industrial and Economic Development Strategy for Stratford-on-Avon District 2018-2023 September 2018 SoADC Industrial and Economic Strategy 2018-2023 Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this Strategy 1.2 Strategic context for the Strategy 1.3 Geographic Context 1.4 Stratford-on-Avon Economy 1.5 Economic Performance 2018 2. Key Challenges and Opportunities 2.1 National 2.2 Regional 2.3 Local 3. Developing Our Strategic Priorities 3.1 Vision, Aims and Priorities 3.2 Summary of Objectives 3.3 Relationship to other Strategies 4. Aim 1: The best place to start and grow a business 4.1 Automotive 4.2 Agricultural and Rural Enterprise 4.3 Growing Businesses and Start-ups 5. Aim 2: Prosperous communities 5.1 Culture, Tourism and Heritage 5.2 Connectivity 5.3 Infrastructure 6. Aim 3: Good jobs and greater earning power for all 6.1 Retail and Town Centres 6.2 Skills 6.3 Incomes and Jobs 7. Delivering the strategy 7.1 Achieving the Vision and Aims 7.2 Action Plan 7.3 Role of Stratford-on-Avon District Council 7.4 Key Players: Local 7.5 Key Players: Sub-regional 7.6 Key Players: Regional 7.7 Monitoring and Review If you have any queries regarding this document please contact the Policy Team. If you find the text in this document difficult to read, we may be able to supply it in a format better suited to your needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Application No. 17/01847/OUT
    COMMITTEE REPORT Application Ref. 17/01847/OUT Redditch Gateway, Land Adjacent To The A4023 Coventry Highway, Site Address East Of Ravensbank And Winyates Green, Redditch Hybrid application comprising: Outline planning application (with matters of appearance, landscaping, layout, scale and details of internal circulation routes reserved) for the development on a phased basis of 32ha of employment land for business/industrial Description of uses (Use Classes B1, B2, B8). The development shall include: Development landscaping, parking, associated infrastructure, utilities, drainage (including SUDS) and ground engineering works; And Full planning application for Phase 1 Ground Engineering works, and details of means of access to the site from the A4023 Applicant Redditch Gateway Infrastructure Ltd Reason for Referral Scale of development to Committee Case Officer Alice Cosnett Presenting Officer Alice Cosnett Ward Member(s) Studley with Mappleborough Green Town/Parish Mappleborough Green Parish Council Council . Southern development parcel allocated under REDD.1: Winyates Green Triangle, Mappleborough Green . Northern development parcel allocated under REDD.2: Gorcott Description of Site Hill, Mappleborough Green Constraints . Application site falls within the jurisdictions of Stratford on Avon District Council, Bromsgrove District Council and Redditch Borough Council Summary of Recommendation GRANT SUBJECT TO S106 AGREEMENT DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND PROPOSAL The site extends to approximately 32 hectares and is within two land parcels to the north and south of the A4023 Coventry Highway, a main dual carriageway arterial road linking from the A435 which forms the eastern boundary of both parcels. The site lies on the edge of the built-up area of Redditch; approximately 2.5 miles from the town centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Core Strategy 2012
    ED.1.4 Stratford-on-Avon District Local Development Framework Draft Core Strategy 2012 FEBRUARY 2012 Stratford-on-Avon District Local Development Framework Draft Core Strategy 2012 February 2012 A large print copy, electronic copy or further paper copies of this publication are available on request © Copyright Stratford-on-Avon District Council Corporate Support Stratford-on-Avon District Council Elizabeth House, Church Street Stratford-upon-Avon Warwickshire CV37 6HX Telephone 01789 267575 e-mail [email protected] Content Page No: Section 1 – Introduction 3-4 Section 2 – Cross Boundary Relationships 5-7 Section 3 – The Vision 8 Section 4 – Strategic Objectives 9 Section 5 – Sustainability Framework 10 - 12 Section 6 – Resources 6.1 Climate Change and Sustainable Energy 13-19 6.2 Safeguarding the Water Environment 20-27 6.3 Waste 28-32 6.4 Minerals 33-36 Section 7 – District Designations 7.1 Green Belt 37-40 7.2 Areas of Restraint 41-43 7.3 Cotswolds Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty 44-47 7.4 Vale of Evesham Control Zone 48-50 Section 8 – District Assets 8.1 Landscape 51-55 8.2 Natural Features 56-61 8.3 Heritage Assets 62-65 8.4 Green Infrastructure 66-72 8.5 Design and Distinctiveness 73-78 Section 9 – Spatial Strategy 9.0 The Preferred Option for Development 79-82 9.1 Distribution of Development 83-88 9.2 Affordable Housing 89-92 9.3 Protection of Housing Stock 93-95 9.4 Specialised Accommodation 96-98 9.5 Housing Mix Type 99-101 9.6 Gypsies & Travellers 102-105 9.7 Economic Development 106-112 9.8 Retail Development
    [Show full text]
  • Report by BBP Regeneration
    Coventry & Warwickshire Sub- Regional Employment Market Signals Study Report by BBP Regeneration For [Client] [Publication date] Based on Data Summer / Autumn 2018 Published April 2019 Based on Data Summer / Autumn 2018 Published July 2019 1 Report prepared by: Studio 432, Metal Box Factory 30 Great Guildford Street London, SE1 0HS [email protected] www.bbpregeneration.co.uk Job number: 2756 Version: FINAL Prepared by: Elena Kosseva / Dolapo David Checked by: Robert Bennett ([email protected]) Status: FINAL details Document © BBP Regeneration 2018 - Neither the whole nor any part of this report may be published in any way without prior consent. Disclaimer: This report is only for the benefit of the party to whom it is addressed, and no responsibility or liability is extended to any third party for the whole or any part of its contents. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of its content, the report has been prepared on the basis of information available at the date of publication and without any independent verification. 2 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Background/ Evidence Base and Benchmarking Review ......................................................... 9 National and Regional Policy and Trends ........................................................................................... 9 Coventry and Warwickshire Sub-Region ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly List Dated 10 August 2020
    Stratford-on-Avon District Council Development Control Valid Applications Received Weekly list Dated 10 August 2020 The following Planning Applications received since the publication of the previous list dated 3 August 2020; may be viewed via the Council’s website http://apps.stratford.gov.uk/eplanning or electronically at Stratford on Avon District Council, Elizabeth House, Church Street, Stratford upon Avon CV37 6HX, during normal office hours, 8.45 am to 5.15 pm Monday to Wednesday inclusive, 8.45 am to 5.00 pm Thursday and Friday. To save the inconvenience of travelling to Elizabeth House, a copy of the submitted plan(s) have also been forwarded to the local Parish Council to whom you may refer. Any persons wishing to make representations about any of these applications may do so in writing to the Planning Manager (Applications and Committee) at Planning and Housing Services, Stratford on Avon District Council, Elizabeth House, Church Street, Stratford upon Avon CV37 6HX or alternatively by email; [email protected]. Please note that all comments received will be a matter of public record and will be made available for public inspection and will be published on the Council’s website at www.stratford.gov.uk/planning. _____________________________________________________________________________ App No 20/02016/FUL Received 28 July 2020 Valid 28 July 2020 Location The Grindles Kings Coughton Alcester B49 5QD Proposal Proposed extension to rear of existing house Applicant Name Mr Garry Taylor Agents Name Mr Lance Cook Agents Address 14 Lamplugh Square Bridlington YO15 2JX Parish ALCESTER TOWN COUNCIL Map Ref East 408308 Map Ref North 258787 _______________________________________________________________________________________________ App No 20/01961/FUL Received 22 July 2020 Valid 23 July 2020 Location Millbank Mill Lane Aston Cantlow B95 6JP Proposal Side extension to replace existing buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • Warwickshire Major Road Network (MRN) Proposed Programme and Priorities
    Communities Overview and Scrutiny Committee 12 February 2020 Warwickshire Major Road Network (MRN) Proposed Programme and Priorities Recommendation(s) 1. That Communities Overview and Scrutiny Committee note the contents of this report which shows how the Major Road Network (MRN) proposals in Warwickshire integrate with national and Local Transport Plan objectives and sets out the proposed prioritisation for scheme development. 1.0 Key Issues 1.1 On 19th June 2019, Communities Overview and Scrutiny Committee considered a report on the Warwickshire Major Road Network (MRN) – Proposed Programme and Priorities which had previously been considered by Cabinet on 11th June 2019. 1.2 The original report recommended that Cabinet: 1) Agrees the proposed Warwickshire Major Road Network (MRN) programme and priorities; 2) Approves the submission of a Strategic Outline Business Case (SOBC) for the proposed A426/A4071 Avon Mill/Hunters Lane Improvement scheme in Rugby as the initial MRN priority for delivery during the period 2020- 2025; and 3) Notes scheme development work already undertaken or in progress on the other initial priority schemes and proposed longer-term priorities for delivery during the next MRN period 2025-2030. 1.3 In accordance with the Cabinet resolution to approve recommendation 2 above, the SOBC for the proposed Avon Mill/Hunters Lane scheme was submitted to Midlands Connect by the deadline of 5th July 2019. 1.4 The other proposed priorities set out in the Cabinet Report were as follows: (a) Proposed delivery during MRN Period 1 (2020-2025): (i) A452 Thickthorn Island to Bericote Road Roundabout Corridor Improvements, Kenilworth. (ii) A444 Nuneaton Town Centre (part of Transforming Nuneaton project).
    [Show full text]
  • County of Hereford and Worces'er - Boundary W ~H Warw Cksh R Local Government
    Review of Non-Metropolitan Counties COUNTY OF HEREFORD AND WORCES'ER - BOUNDARY W ~H WARW CKSH R LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION f'OH ENGLAND REPORT NO. 592 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE FRICS FSVA Members Mr K F J Ennals CB Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany THE RT HON CHRIS PATTEN MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES THE COUNTY OF HEREFORD AND WORCESTER AND ITS BOUNDARY WITH WARWICKSHIRE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION i 1. On 2 September 1986, we wrote to Hereford and Worcester County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the county under Section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of our letter were sent to all the principal local authorities and parishes in Hereford and Worcester, and in the adjoining counties of Gloucestershire, Shropshire, Staffordshire and Warwickshire; to the National and County Associations of Local Councils; to Members of Parliament with constituency interests; and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition, copies were sent to those government departments with an interest; the West Midlands Regional Health Authority; public utilities; the English Tourist Board; the editors of the Municipal Journal and Local Government Chronicle; and to local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The County Councils were requested to assist us in publicising the start of the review by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the area concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Warwickshire County Council Stratford-On-Avon Strategic Transport Assessment Phase 2 Studley Scenario Analysis
    Warwickshire County Council Stratford-on-Avon Strategic Transport Assessment Phase 2 Studley Scenario Analysis 211439-19.R015 Issue | 25 July 2013 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 211439-19 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd The Arup Campus Blythe Gate Blythe Valley Park Solihull B90 8AE United Kingdom www.arup.com Warwickshire County Council Stratford-on-Avon Strategic Transport Assessment Phase 2 Studley Scenario Analysis Contents Page 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Overview 1 1.2 Scope 1 1.3 Study Objectives 1 1.4 Study Area 1 2 Scenario Development 3 2.1 2028 Reference Case Development 3 2.2 Core Strategy Scenarios 4 2.3 Trip Distributions 9 2.4 Scenario Demands 10 3 Results Analysis 13 3.1 Overview 13 3.2 Model Stability 13 3.3 Number of Runs 14 3.4 Network Wide Statistics 14 3.5 Average Maximum Queue Length Analysis 14 3.6 Additional Analysis 16 4 Studley Scenario Testing – Outline Impact Analysis 17 4.1 2028 Core Strategy Allocation: Results Analysis 17 4.2 Model Stability 17 4.3 Network Wide Statistics 17 4.4 Maximum Queue Length Analysis 21 4.5 Summary 21 5 AQMA Analysis 22 5.1 Overview 24 5.2 Results Analysis 25 5.3 Summary 25 Appendices Appendix A Studley Average Maximum Queue Difference Plots 211439-19.R015 | Issue | 25 July 2013 J:\211000\211439-19\4 INTERNAL PROJECT DATA\4-05 REPORTS\STRATFORD STA PHASE 2\ISSUE\211439-19 R015 2 - SDC STA PHASE 2 - STUDLEY SCENARIO MODELLING REPORT_ISSUE.DOCX Warwickshire County Council Stratford-on-Avon Strategic Transport Assessment Phase 2 Studley Scenario Analysis 1 Introduction 1.1 Overview Arup have been commissioned by Warwickshire County Council and Stratford on Avon District Council to undertake strategic level testing and impact analysis of potential Core Strategy allocations for Stratford on Avon District Council (SDC).
    [Show full text]
  • MINUTES of the 97Th MEETING of MAPPLEBOROUGH GREEN PARISH COUNCIL HELD on MONDAY 20Th January 2020 at 7:30Pm, in Mappleborough Green School
    MINUTES OF THE 97th MEETING OF MAPPLEBOROUGH GREEN PARISH COUNCIL HELD ON MONDAY 20th January 2020 at 7:30pm, in Mappleborough Green School PRESENT Cllrs. Coley (Chair), Berry, Cameron (Vice), Lyon and Badwal District Cllr Peter Hencher-Serafin and County Cllr Rickhards Becky Howes Clerk 1. THE CHAIR DECLARED THE MEETING OPEN AT 7:30pm 2. APOLOGIES: Cllr Chadwick 3. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST: none 4. PUBLIC FORUM: One member of the public was present, Carolyn Lewis, resident from Pratts Lane. Carolyn addressed the Parish Council, following recent discussions with Cllr Berry, identifying her and neighbours concerns regards recent flooding in the parish. A discussion took place regards the serious flooding issues in Pratts Lane, Common Lane and Orchard Place and the dangerous outcome of the most recent floodings, with cars being abandoned on the main roads. Carolyn stated that she was arranging a meeting with Warwickshire and Worcestershire Council representatives and Nadhim Zahawi MP and asked if a Parish Council member could also be present and for support of the Parish Council in this matter. The Parish Council agreed for representation to be made at the meeting and offered support. Cllr Rickhards stated that he had contacted the Flood Management Team today and suggested the Parish Council do the same, all agreed, Clerk to action. Cllr Coley thanked Carolyn for attending. 5. To Approve and Sign the Minutes of the 96th meeting of the Parish Council on Monday November 11th 2019, Vice Chair Cllr Cameron to sign the Minutes as a true record Cllr Lyon proposed the minutes, seconded by Cllr Berry all agreed, Cllr Cameron signed as a true record.
    [Show full text]