INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS NEGOTIATIONS (2Nd Edition) INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS and MANAGEMENT SERIES Series Editor: Pervez N
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GE Works GE 2012 Annual Report Annual 2012 GE
General Electric Company Fairfield, Connecticut 06828 www.ge.com GE Works GE 2012 Annual Report 2012 Annual Report 3.EPC055148101A.103 “ Last year we set focused execution goals for GE: double-digit industrial earnings growth; margin expansion; restarting CITIZENSHIP AT GE the GE Capital dividend to the parent; reducing the size of IN 2012, WE GE Capital; and balanced capital allocation. We achieved all As a 130-year-old ~ 2^]caXQdcTS\^aTcWP]!!\X[[X^]c^R^\\d]XcXTbP]S technology company, nonprofit organizations. of our goals for the year.” GE has proven its ~ ;Pd]RWTS abc^UPZX]S_a^VaP\bcWPcQaX]VcWT[PcTbc JEFF IMMELT, CHAIRMAN AND CEO breast cancer technologies to women. sustainability. Working Healthymagination and Susan G. Komen for the Cure have to solve some of the partnered to bring the latest breast cancer technologies to world’s biggest challenges, more women, by encouraging women to be screened through targeted programs in the U.S., China and Saudi Arabia. Citizenship is in the ~ 6T]TaPcTS! QX[[X^]X]aTeT]dTUa^\^daTR^\PVX]PcX^] products we make, how product portfolio. we make them, and in the difference we make 2012 PERFORMANCE in communities around GE’s newest Evolution Series GE is one of the largest locomotive prototype (pictured) employers in the U.S. and the world. reduces emissions by more than the world, with 134,000 70% compared with 2005 engines, U.S. employees and www.gecitizenship.com saving railroad customers more 305,000 employees globally, CONSOLIDATED REVENUES GE SCORECARD (In $ billions) than $1.5 billion in infrastructure as of the end of 2012. -
Creative Accounting, Fraud and International Accounting Scandals
Creative Accounting, Fraud and International Accounting Standards Michael Jones University of Bristol [email protected] 1 Overview • Based on Book: Creative Accounting, Fraud and International Accounting Scandals • Investigates nature of creative accounting and fraud • Examines history of accounting scandals • Looks at creative accounting, fraud and accounting scandals in 13 countries worldwide • Focus on political aspects 2 Creative Accounting 3 Two Quotes “How do you explain to an intelligent public that it is possible for two companies in the same industry to follow entirely different accounting principles and both get a true and fair audit report?” M. Lafferty “Every company in the country is fiddling its profits”. I. Griffiths 4 Definitions 1. Fair Presentation Using the flexibility within accounting to give a true and fair picture of the accounts so that they serve the interests of users 5 Definitions 2. Creative Accounting Using the flexibility within accounting to manage the measurement and presentation of the accounts so that they serve the interests of preparers 6 Definitions 3. Impression Management Using the flexibility of the accounts (especially narrative and graphs) to convey a more favourable view than is warranted of a company’s results serving the interests of preparers 7 Definitions 4. Fraud Stepping outside the Regulatory Framework deliberately to give a false picture of the accounts 8 Definitions No Flexibility to give Flexibility to Flexibility to Flexibility a “true and fair“ give a give a view creative view fraudulent view Regulatory Working within Working within Working framework regulatory regulatory framework outside eliminates framework to ensure to serve preparer’s regulatory accounting choice users’ interests interests framework Within regulatory framework Outside regulatory framework 9 Managerial Motivation 1. -
Culture, Management Style, and Business Systems Chapter
Culture, Chapter 5 Management Style, and Business Systems CHAPTER OUTLINE CHAPTER LEARNING OBJECTIVES Global Perspective: Do Blondes Have More Fun in Japan? What you should learn from Chapter 5: Required Adaptation LO1 The necessity for adapting to cultural differences Degree of Adaptation LO2 How and why management styles vary around Imperatives, Electives, and Exclusives the world The Impact of American Culture on Management Style LO3 The extent and implications of gender bias in other countries Management Styles around the World Authority and Decision Making LO4 The importance of cultural differences in business Management Objectives and Aspirations ethics Communication Styles LO5 The differences between relationship-oriented Formality and Tempo P-Time versus M-Time and information-oriented cultures Negotiations Emphasis Marketing Orientation Gender Bias in International Business Business Ethics Corruption Defi ned The Western Focus on Bribery Bribery: Variations on a Theme Ethical and Socially Responsible Decisions Culture’s Infl uence on Strategic Thinking Synthesis: Relationship-Oriented versus Information- Oriented Cultures cat2994X_ch05_124-157.indd 124 18/08/10 12:12 PM PART TWO Global Perspective DO BLONDES HAVE MORE FUN IN JAPAN? Recounts one American executive, “My fi rst trip to Japan Then about seven years ago, Mattel Inc. conducted con- was pretty much a disaster for several reasons. The meet- sumer research around the world and learned something sur- ings didn’t run smoothly because every day at least 20, if prising: The original Barbie, with her yellow hair and blue not more, people came walking in and out of the room just eyes, played as well in Hong Kong as it did in Hollywood. -
The Real Scandal on Spain's Economic Scene
Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 10, Number 10, March 15, 1983 ical environment of Spain today would appear to have other motivations than economic ones. A key to the apparent mystery may be the unusual serenity of the private banks. Indeed, it is now suspected that the entire operation against Rumasa was cooked up between the top private banks, in particular Banesto, Bilbao, Central, and Hispanoamericano, and Mariano Rubio, deputy governor of the Bank of Spain since 1965 and architect of the monetarist The real scandal on takeover of the country's finances. The profile of these top banks is highly interesting. Spain's economic scene Investments abroad-otherWise known as capital flight doubled in 1982 relative to 1981. Ninty-five percent of all overseas investment by banks was carried out by the top 10, by Katherine Kanter in Paris and after the United States-Miami, to be precise--Chile, Portugal, and Puerto Rico were the major recipients of Span When Spanish Finance Minister Miguel Boyer announced ish bankers' money. Investments increased most into Chile, Feb. 23, that due to non-cooperation on the part of the coun Puerto Rico, and Uruguary, and decreased in those countries try's largest private enterprise Rumasa S.A. (1.5 percent of struggling to industrialize in spite of their debt burden: Ar the GNP, 400 companies, 350,000 employees, 18 banks), gentina, Mexico, Brazil, and Peru. the government would probably have to send in auditors from Now, whatever one may think of the "ride' em cowboy" the central bank, the Bank of Spain, he provoked an imme entrepreneurial approach of Ruiz Mateus, the unescapable diate run on the Rumasa group's banks and a stir in the fact is that the Rumasa empire he controlled was the only :'1ternational financialpress demanding that Spain should be major economic and financial power in the country with some blacklisted on the credit markets. -
Common Draft Terms of Merger Banco Santander-Banesto
Common Draft Terms of Merger BETWEEN BANCO SANTANDER, S.A. (as absorbing company) AND BANCO ESPAÑOL DE CRÉDITO, S.A. (as absorbed company) Boadilla del Monte and Madrid, 9 January 2013 1/50 1. INTRODUCTION For purposes of the provisions of sections 30 and 31, et seq. of Law 3/2009 of 3 April, on Structural Modifications of Mercantile Companies (hereinafter, the “Structural Modifications Act”), the undersigned, in their capacity as members of the Board of Directors of Banco Santander, S.A. (“Santander”) and Banco Español de Crédito, S.A. (“Banesto”), respectively, prepare and sign these common draft terms of merger (proyecto común de fusion) (hereinafter, the “Draft Terms of Merger” or the “Draft Terms”), which shall be subject to the approval of the General Shareholders’ Meetings of Santander and Banesto in accordance with the provisions of section 40 of the Structural Modifications Act. The integration of Banco Banif, S.A. (“Banif”) in Santander will be executed in a separate operation. The text of the Terms is as follows. 2. RATIONALE FOR THE MERGER The merger by absorption of Banesto by Santander occurs within the context of a profound restructuring of the Spanish financial system, which involves a major reduction in the number of institutions and the creation of larger institutions. In addition, the Spanish financial system has lost profitability over the last five years due to a drop in margins, which has adversely affected efficiency despite an improvement in costs, as well as to cyclically high provisions. In brief, the financial sector needs to optimise its income, margins, and fees, normalise provisions, and, in sum, improve efficiency. -
Offering Circular BANESTO FINANCIAL PRODUCTS PLC
Offering Circular BANESTO FINANCIAL PRODUCTS PLC (Incorporated with limited liability in Ireland but with its tax residence in the Kingdom of Spain) EUR 10,000,000,000 Euro Medium Term Note Programme guaranteed by BANCO ESPAÑOL DE CRÉDITO, S.A. (Incorporated with limited liability in the Kingdom of Spain) This base prospectus ("Base Prospectus") has been approved by the Central Bank of Ireland (the "Central Bank"), as competent authority under the Prospectus Directive 2003/71/EC (the "Prospectus Directive"). The Central Bank only approves this Base Prospectus as meeting the requirements imposed under Irish and EU law pursuant to the Prospectus Directive. Such approval relates only to the notes (the "Notes") which are to be admitted to trading on the regulated market of the Irish Stock Exchange or other regulated markets for the purposes of Directive 2004/39/EC or which are to be offered to the public in any Member State of the European Economic Area. This Base Prospectus, as approved and published by the Central Bank, in accordance with the requirements of the Prospective Directive, comprises a Base Prospectus for the purposes of the Prospectus Directive and the Prospectus (Directive 2003/71/EC) Regulations 2005, and for the purpose of giving information with regard to the issue of Notes issued under the Euro Medium Term Note Programme (the "Programme") described herein, during the period of twelve months after the date hereof. This document has also been approved as listing particulars (the "Listing Particulars") by the Irish Stock Exchange pursuant to its listing and admission to trading rules (the "Listing Rules") for the purpose of providing information with regard to the issue of Notes issued under the Programme described herein, to be admitted to trading on the Global Exchange Market ("GEM") during the twelve month period following the date hereof. -
2015 Interim Report
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS Revenue Continuing operations Six months ended 30 June 1st Half 2nd Half 2015 2014 Change (Restated) 6,000 Performance 5,000 Earnings per share HK$2.62 HK$1.60 +64% Interim dividend per share HK$0.60 HK$0.60 - 4,000 n millio ’ 3,000 HK$’mil HK$’mil HK$ Revenue 2,000 - Hong Kong TV broadcasting 1,386 1,581 -12% - Hong Kong digital new media business 72 87 -17% 1,000 - Programme licensing and distribution 483 516 -6% - Overseas pay TV operations 93 122 -23% 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 - Channel operations 55 63 -12% YEAR - Other activities 42 29 +45% - Inter-segment elimination (100) (109 ) -7% 2,031 2,289 -11% Prot Attributable to Equity Holders of the Company Total expenses (1,570) (1,550 ) +1% 1st Half 2nd Half Share of losses of associates (33) (42) -23% Profit attributable to equity holders 1,148 700 +64% 2,000 1,800 30 June 31 December 1,600 2015 2014 1,400 HK$’mil HK$’mil 9,258 10,557 -12% Total assets n 1,200 illio 1,233 1,853 -33% Total liabilities m 1,000 ’ K$ Total equity 8,025 8,704 -8% H 800 Number of issued shares 438,000,000 438,000,000 600 400 Ratios 200 Current ratio 8.2 5.0 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Gearing 5.0% 4.5% YEAR Revenue by Operating Segment by Operating Segment % relating to 1st half of 2014 are shown in brackets % relating to 1st half of 2014 are shown in brackets Hong Kong TV Programme Hong Kong TV Programme broadcasting licensing and broadcasting licensing and 67% (68%) distribution 52% (58%) distribution 20% (20%) 48% (40%) Hong Kong Overseas pay TV digital new operations Hong Kong media -
A Guide to Sources of Information on Foreign Investment in Spain 1780-1914 Teresa Tortella
A Guide to Sources of Information on Foreign Investment in Spain 1780-1914 Teresa Tortella A Guide to Sources of Information on Foreign Investment in Spain 1780-1914 Published for the Section of Business and Labour Archives of the International Council on Archives by the International Institute of Social History Amsterdam 2000 ISBN 90.6861.206.9 © Copyright 2000, Teresa Tortella and Stichting Beheer IISG All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Niets uit deze uitgave mag worden vermenigvuldigd en/of openbaar worden gemaakt door middel van druk, fotocopie, microfilm of op welke andere wijze ook zonder voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de uitgever. Stichting Beheer IISG Cruquiusweg 31 1019 AT Amsterdam Table of Contents Introduction – iii Acknowledgements – xxv Use of the Guide – xxvii List of Abbreviations – xxix Guide – 1 General Bibliography – 249 Index Conventions – 254 Name Index – 255 Place Index – 292 Subject Index – 301 Index of Archives – 306 Introduction The purpose of this Guide is to provide a better knowledge of archival collections containing records of foreign investment in Spain during the 19th century. Foreign in- vestment is an important area for the study of Spanish economic history and has always attracted a large number of historians from Spain and elsewhere. Many books have already been published, on legal, fiscal and political aspects of foreign investment. The subject has always been a topic for discussion, often passionate, mainly because of its political im- plications. -
Corporate Governance in the 2007–2008 Financial Crisis: Evidence
Journal of Corporate Finance 18 (2012) 389–411 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Corporate Finance journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jcorpfin Corporate governance in the 2007–2008 financial crisis: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide David H. Erkens a, Mingyi Hung a,⁎, Pedro Matos b a Leventhal School of Accounting, Marshall School of Business, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, United States b Department of Finance, Darden School of Business, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22906, United States article info abstract Article history: This paper investigates the influence of corporate governance on financial firms' performance Received 27 September 2011 during the 2007–2008 financial crisis. Using a unique dataset of 296 financial firms from 30 Received in revised form 15 January 2012 countries that were at the center of the crisis, we find that firms with more independent Accepted 17 January 2012 boards and higher institutional ownership experienced worse stock returns during the crisis Available online 28 January 2012 period. Further exploration suggests that this is because (1) firms with higher institutional ownership took more risk prior to the crisis, which resulted in larger shareholder losses during JEL classification: the crisis period, and (2) firms with more independent boards raised more equity capital G2 during the crisis, which led to a wealth transfer from existing shareholders to debtholders. G3 Overall, our findings add to the literature by examining the corporate governance determi- N2 nants of financial firms' performance during the 2007–2008 crisis. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Corporate governance Credit crisis Global financial institutions 1. -
2020 Annual Report on Corporate Governance
BANCO SANTANDER, S.A. 2020 INFORMATION ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND REMUNERATIONS → 2020 Annual corporate governance report → 2020 Activities reports of the audit; nomination; remuneration; risk supervision, regulation and compliance; responsible banking, sustainability and culture; and innovation and technology committees → 2020 Annual directors’ remuneration report The corporate governance chapter of the consolidated directors’ report that forms part of the 2020 Annual Report of Banco Santander, S.A. (Banco Santander) is attached. The entire document is available on the Banco Santander’s corporate website (www.santander.com). This chapter includes the content of the 2020 annual corporate governance and remuneration report, drafted in a free format as we have been doing since the entry into force of the relevant Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores’s Circular, as well as the 2020 activities reports of the audit; nomination; remuneration; risk supervision, regulation and compliance; responsible banking, sustainability culture; and innovation and technology committees. The chapter must be read in conjunction with the other sections of the 2020 Annual Report given it forms part of it. In addition, due to that circumstance, it must be noted that the automatic links to other sections that are included in the attached document will not work. The references to find the above mentioned information within the attached chapter are the following: → 2020 Annual corporate governance report Entire corporate governance chapter → 2020 Activities reports of the audit; nomination; Sections 4.5, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9 remuneration; risk, supervision and compliance; and 4.10, respectively responsible banking, sustainability and culture; and innovation and technology committees Sections 6 (excluding section → 2020 Annual directors’ remuneration report 6.6), 9.4 and 9.5 Annual report 2020 Contents Corporate governance 168 Responsible Corporate Economic Risk management banking governance and financial review and compliance 1. -
Gemmel V. Immelt, No. 650780 2018, 2019 BL 264106 (Sup
Gemmel v. Immelt, No. 650780_2018, 2019 BL 264106 (Sup. Ct. June 28, 2019), Court Opinion Printed By: EBRANDWEIN1 on Friday, July 19, 2019 - 8:23 AM Case Analysis Summary Positive 0 Distinguished 0 Caution 0 Superseded 0 Negative 0 Total 0 Direct History Summary Caution 0 Negative 0 Total 0 Pagination defendant General Electric Company (GE) (NYSCEF * BL Doc. No. (NYSCEF) 23, affirmation of defendants' counsel, exhibit A [amended complaint], ¶¶ 17-19). Majority Opinion > GE is a New York corporation based in Boston, Massachusetts ( id., ¶ 20). Defendants Jeffrey R. SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK Immelt, Sebastien N. Bazin, W. Geoffrey Beattie, John COUNTY J. Brennan, Francisco D'Souza, Marijn E. Dekkers, John L. Flannery, Edward P. Garden, Peter B. Henry, Susan J. Hockfield, Andrea Jung, Risa Lavizza- RICHARD GAMMEL, HOWARD LASKER, MICHAEL Mourey, Rochelle B. Lazarus, Steven M. Mollenkopf, BERNSTEIN IRA, Plaintiff, - v - JEFFREY IMMELT, James J. Mulva, James E. Rohr, Mary L. Schapiro, SEBASTIEN BAZIN, W BEATTIE, JOHN BRENNAN, James S. Tisch, and Lowell C. McAdam (collectively, FRANCISCO DSOUZA, MARIJN DEKKERS, JOHN the Director Defendants) are either current or former FLANNERY, EDWARD GARDEN, PETER HENRY, members of GE's board of directors (the Board) and SUSAN HOCKFIELD, ANDREA JUNG, RISA the committees, including the Audit Committee, the GE LAVIZZO-MOUREY, ROCHELLE LAZARUS, STEVEN Capital Committee, the Compensation Committee, and MOLLENKOPF, JAMES MULVA, JAMES ROHR, the Risk Committee, charged with overseeing GE's MARY SCHAPIRO, JAMES TISCH, LOWELL business operations ( id., ¶¶ 21-39). Apart from Immelt MCADAM, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, and Flannery, both of whom served as chief executive Defendant. -
Ge 2013 Annual Report 1 Letter to Shareowners
Progress GE Works 20132013 AnnualAnnual ReportReport ON THE COVER: Shana Sands, GE Power & Water, Greenville, South Carolina. Turbine is destined for Djelfa, Algeria. PICTURED: Lyman Jerome, GE Aviation Focusing our best capabilities on what matters most to our investors, employees, customers and the world’s progress. PICTURED, PAGE 1 Back row (left to right): JOHN G. RICE KEITH S. SHERIN SUSAN P. PETERS Vice Chairman, GE Vice Chairman, GE Senior Vice President, and Chairman and Human Resources MARK M. LITTLE Chief Executive Officer, Senior Vice President and JEFFREY S. BORNSTEIN GE Capital Chief Technology Officer Senior Vice President and Front row (left to right): Chief Financial Officer JEFFREY R. IMMELT Chairman of the Board and JAMIE S. MILLER BETH COMSTOCK Chief Executive Officer Senior Vice President and Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer Chief Marketing Officer DANIEL C. HEINTZELMAN Vice Chairman, Enterprise BRACKETT B. DENNISTON III NOT PICTURED: John L. Risk and Operations Senior Vice President and Flannery, Senior Vice President, General Counsel Business Development 2013 PERFORMANCE CONSOLIDATED SEGMENT OPERATING EARNINGS GE CFOA REVENUES (In $ billions) PROFIT (In $ billions) PER SHARE (In $ billions) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 $154 $149 $147 $147 $146 CAPITAL 5149 48 45 44 $24.5 $1.64 $17.8 $17.4* $22.8 $1.51 $16.4 $20.5 $1.30 $14.7 $17.2 $1.13 NBCU 15 17 6 2 2 $15.7 $12.1 $0.91 INDUSTRIAL 88 83 93 100 100 *Excludes NBCUniversal deal-related taxes GE Scorecard Industrial Segment Profi t Growth 5% Return on Total Capital 11.3% Cash from GE Capital $6B GE Capital Tier 1 Common Ratio 11.2% Margin Growth 60bps GE Year-End Market Capitalization $282B, +$64B Cash Returned to Investors $18.2B GE Rank by Market Capitalization #6 GE 2013 ANNUAL REPORT 1 LETTER TO SHAREOWNERS MAKING PROGRESS GE has stayed competitive for more than a century—not because we are perfect—but because we make progress.