Findings of the Households Assessments of Syrian Households in Host Communities Irbid Governorate 25Th February 2013 BACKGROUND
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Findings of the Households Assessments of Syrian Households in Host Communities Irbid Governorate 25th February 2013 BACKGROUND The continued crisis in Syria has caused a large influx of Syrians into Jordan, amounting to more than 242,162 refugees (UNHCR, 25.02.2013). According to UNHCR registration data, more than 90% have settled in Northern Jordan, as well as the urban and peri- urban centres of Amman and Zarqa, with the large majority of refugees settling within host communities. Information management systems available to humanitarian actors have struggled to keep pace with the rapidly changing refugee context. With this in mind, REACH was deployed to Jordan in October 2012 in order to complement information management efforts undertaken by other humanitarian actors, notably by UN agencies, and to contribute towards addressing information gaps on Syrian refugees located in camps and host communities. By establishing a baseline dataset that includes key information on the geographical distribution, conditions and priority needs of Syrian refugees, REACH aims to ensure better planning, coordination and traceability of humanitarian aid. The data presented in this factsheet represents the findings of household level interviews that were conducted in the host communities of Irbid Governorate in December 2012. During this phase of the project, 8,903 displaced Syrian households, representing 38,479 individuals, were assessed. The household assessments focused on collecting five key sets of information from each households: 1. Household demographic data; 2. Registration card numbers; 3. Displacement profile; 4. Accommodation context; 5. Services and Needs. Additionally, assessment team leaders collected GPS data for each building housing Syrian refugee households in order to allow for the mapping of key data trends discovered through the analysis of collected data. Assessment Methodology REACH’s assessment methodology is based on a three step approach to data collection that gradually sharpens the understanding of the context both in terms of geographical focus as well as depth of data, as shown in the figure below. The objective of this process is to provide humanitarian actors with information that allows for more informed decision-making with regards to their targeting of specific geographic locations or beneficiary group based on their programme planning needs; thus enabling better planning, coordination and traceability of aid. As such the REACH methodology (outlined in the figure below) focuses primarily on the geographic identification of refugees living in host communities and collects a core baseline of household specific information that enables the preparation of situational analyses. - Division of an area of intervention into neighbourhoods/mantikas as basic service units Phase I; Identification of Community (BSUs) that have the attributes of having boundaries that can be defined with a similar Units (BSUs) understanding by different community individuals or groups. Key Informant interviews are conducted within each BSU to collect information that can inform later steps in the process. Phase II; HH - Household level assessment including demographic data, accommodation status, Survey and registration status, protection concerns, displacement profile, and needs / access to basic Context Analysis services. Collection of secondary data to support the analysis will be conducted. Phase III; - Targeted programme assessment of areas in which refugee families are located according to project needs Thematic / assessment ToRs. Use of BSUs to link with community leaders to facilitate access to all groups and analysis specifically most vulnerable households. Collected data informs programme planning and implementation. Geographical Scope / Depth of Data of Depth / Scope Geographical A partnership of: Key findings the exception of Al Hassakeh, with no households reporting it to be their area of origin, at least five households reported to A total of 8,904 households were identified through the originate from each Syrian Governorate. See Annex 2 for assessment, representing approximately 38,485 individuals. area of origin by sub-district. Of these, 5,471 households (22,975 individuals) were settled in urban areas in the Governorate (Irbid and Ramtha cities) Figure 2 - Household Governorate of Origin and 3,433 households (15,510 individuals) in rural areas. Rural Annex 1 shows the breakdown of individuals by BSU in Irbid Damascus Governorate. Damascus 2% City 5% Hama Other Dara Household profile 2% 2% As Sweida Homs The average size of households identified through the 9% Homs assessment was 4.3, with an even split between males and As Sweida Damascus City 2% females (2.1 and 2.2 per household on average). Hama 66% of individuals identified were reported to be under the Rural Damascus age of 18, of which 18% under the age of 5. Only 30% of Other reported direct family members were aged between 25 and Dara 59, indicating a high dependency ratio. 78% Table 1 – Age profile of displaced households1 The Syrian Governorate of Dara, geographically adjacent to Age Males Females Total % Irbid Governorate, had overwhelmingly the largest population Under 5 3559 3442 18% displacement rate into Irbid of all Governorates in Syria at the 5 to 11 4047 3745 20% time of the assessment. The number of displaced Syrian households in Irbid reporting to be from Dara represents 2.9% 12 to 17 3053 2794 15% of the population of Dara as per the 2011 census (UNHCR, 18 to 24 2148 2705 13% 2011). The Syrian Governorates with the next largest 25 to 59 5306 6204 30% percentage of population displacement into Irbid Governorate over 60 477 669 3% are As Sweida and Homs, both with 0.2% of the 2011 Total 18590 19559 100% population being displaced into Irbid. Annex 3 maps this information. 205 households reported having children under 18 with them Figure 3 - Percentage of 2011 population who were part of their extended family but not directly related displaced to Irbid Governorate to them, and only 22 reported having children under 18 with 2.89 them who were not part of the family or extended family. 3.00 2.50 Displacement profile 2.00 1.50 The vast majority of households identified, 78%, reported that 1.00 they were originally displaced from the Syrian Governorate of 0.2 0.19 0.1 0.04 0.02 0.01 Daraa. Other Syrian Governorates from which a sizeable 0.50 0.00 proportion of identified households originate include Homs, census 2011per as populationof % 9%, Damascus city, 5%, Hama, 2%, and Rural Damascus, 2%. Additionally, a very small number of households reported being displaced from the Governorates of Aleppo, Idleb, Deir- ez-Zor, Ar Raqqa, Quneitra, Lattakia, and Tartous representing less than 2% of the total. The geographic spread Of the households identified through the assessment, 93% of household origin covered nearly the whole of Syria. With were displaced from their place of origin in 2012. The third quarter of 2012 saw the highest displacement rate amongst 1 Note: age breakdown of household was not answered by all households currently resident in Irbid Governorate, with 46% respondents A partnership of: of those who left their homes in 2012 being displaced in July, members would likely be joining them in Jordan within two August, or September. months from the time of assessment. A very high proportion of households, 20%, reported that Figure 4 - Month of original displacement male family members over the age of 18 were left behind in 20% Syria at the time of assessment. Furthermore, a small number 15% of households reported having females over 18 left behind in Syria, 7%. In addition to those households with family 10% members left behind in Syria, a small proportion reported that 5% family members were residing outside either Jordan or Syria % of respondentsof % 0% at the time of assessment. Figure 6 - Households with family members left 2012 behind 25 The reported dates of arrival in Jordan mirror these trends of 20 initial displacement, with 7,959 of the 8,456 respondents who 15 provided a date of arrival having arrived in 2012 – 47% of % of householdsof % 10 these in July/August/September. 5 Only 12% of respondents reported having stayed in a different 0 location in Syria for more than a week after initial Males under 18 Females under Males over 18 Females over 18 18 displacement from their home, implying that the majority left the country immediately following initial displacement. The large majority of respondents, 82%, reported finding out 47% of Syrian households identified through the assessment about services available to them upon arrival in Jordan from reported that they arrived at their current location within 1 other Syrian families, and 11% reported finding out week of entering Jordan, with 27% of the total reporting arrival information from Jordanian families. 1% received information in their current location on the same day. A considerable about services through text messages, radio/television, or proportion of respondents, 28%, reported that they had been local charities2. present in Jordan for between one and six months before settling in Irbid. Only a very small proportion, representing 1% If their household faced problems or threats, the vast majority, of the total, reported that they had been in Jordan for over a 71%, of households reported that they felt comfortable to year before settling in Irbid Governorate. raise concerns with the Jordanian police. In addition to this a sizeable proportion of households, 25%, reported that they would seek the help of other Syrian families. Interestingly, Figure 5 - Time spent in Jordan before despite the perceived level of support from local NGOs / arrival at current location charities regarding the distribution of various forms of 30% assistance (see below), only a very small proportion, 1%, of 25% households felt these organisations were appropriate to 20% contact when facing problems. 15% of respondentsof % 10% 5% 0% Same 1-7 8-14 15 1-3 3-6 6 mths > 1 day days days days - mths mths - 1 year 1 mth year The majority of households reported that they travelled to Jordan with their complete family unit, 72%.