DOCSLIB.ORG

1. Agent Orange 2. Camp David Accords 3. Détente 4. Domino

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1. Agent Orange 2. Camp David Accords 3. Détente 4. Domino American II – Unit 7 – Vocabulary Words 1. Agent orange 2. Camp David Accords 3. Détente 4. Domino Theory 5. Doves 6. Feminism 7. Geneva Accords 8. Hawks 9. Ho Chi Minh 10. Ho Chi Minh Trail 11. Iran Hostage Crisis 12. Kent State Shootings 13. Mandate 14. My Lai Massacre 15. Napalm 16. Ngo Dinh Diem 17. Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) 18. pardon 19. realpolitik 20. SALT II 21. Search and Destroy Missions 22. Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT I) 23. Tet Offensive 24. The Pentagon Papers 25. Tonkin Gulf Resolution 26. Vietcong 27. Vietminh 28. Vietnamization 29. Watergate 30. Woodward and Berstein AMERICAN II - UNIT 7 – Notes Moving Toward Conflict France Controlled Vietnam since late 1800’s, but the peasants disliked foreign rule, followed Ho Chi Minh, the communist leader of Vietnam throughout the Vietnam War, who was exiled to China Japan forced out France in WWII, but faced problems with peasants with return of Ho Chi Minh who started Vietminh (Vietnamese word to describe their dislike of foreign rule, and desire to rule themselves) After Japanese defeat in WWII, France wanted to take back over Vietnam Vietnamese fought back with Ho Chi Minh 1. What was Vietminh and why did the Vietnamese want it? Moving Toward Conflict (cont) US afraid of Domino Theory - This is an American belief that if one country falls to communism the surrounding countries to fall to communism as well soon afterwards The French were beaten and surrendered in northwest Vietnam in 1954 Geneva Accords – This agreement between America and Vietnam temporary divided Vietnam along 17th parallel in 1954. N. Vietnam being communist with elections in 1956 to decide leader of N and S Vietnam 2. Why was America so confident that the Geneva Accords would peacefully solve the Vietnam issue? Why did it not end up solving the situation? Moving Toward Conflict (cont) Ho Chi Minh had great popularity in the North b/c he divided up land between the peasants Ngo Dinh Diem, S. Vietnam’s democratic leader, was very corrupt and lost so much popularity, refused to run in 1956 election. By 1957 Ho Chi Minh started attacking S. Vietnam with Vietcong (Citizens of South Vietnam who would support and fight for the North Vietnamese) using the Ho Chi Minh Trail (A Trail that went through Laos and Cambodia along the Board of Vietnam that the North Vietnamese would use to supply or attack South Vietnam.) 3. What is the difference between the Vietcong and the North Vietnamese Army? Moving Toward Conflict (cont) By 1963, the US had put 16,000 US troops in S. Vietnam to keep them from falling to communism Ngo Dinh Diem was Catholic, and country was Buddhist, he tried stop Buddhism, and monks set themselves on fire to protest The US needed to “replace” Diem b/c he lost support of the people, so the US allowed him to be assassinated 4. What was Ngo Dien Diem doing that made America unhappy with him? Moving Toward Conflict (cont) Now S. Vietnam needed a leader, and none could be found, this made S. Vietnam weaker United States wanted to get involved, and knew an “attack” would be the only way in which the people would buy a war USS Maddox was supposedly attacked by N. Vietnamese President Johnson helped pass the Tonkin Gulf Resolution – This act of congress allowed the President complete control to “defend” South Vietnam by any means necessary and congress couldn’t over ride him. 5. What supposedly happened in the Gulf of Tonkin that made America want to get more involved? US Involvement and Escalation Lyndon B. Johnson is president, and by 1965, 50,000 US troops are in Vietnam Johnson listened to pro-war advisors left over from JFK that encourage escalation 61% of Americans in 1965 support the war 6. Why do you think so many people supported the war at first? US Involvement and Escalation (Cont.) The American Commander in Vietnam: General William Westmoreland He said that the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN), S. Vietnam Army, was horrible, and the US should do all the work Most fighting done in the Jungles in Vietnam Vietcong used guerilla tactics, and hid in tunnels underground between attacks, also blended in with the ordinary people 7. What kind of tactics did the Vietcong and North Vietnamese Army use that was difficult for America to fight against? US Involvement and Escalation (Cont.) US wanted to win the “hearts and minds” of the S. Vietnamese people, to help find the Vietcong Napalm (fire bombs dropped from planes during Vietnam) and agent orange (jungle killer used by American military during Vietnam. Caused many sicknesses and diseases) hurt he S. Vietnamese and made them sick. Didn’t like the US. Search and Destroy Missions – Marines would attack villages thought of harboring Vietcong 8. What were some of the negative consequences of using Napalm and Agent Orange in Vietnam? US Involvement and Escalation (Cont.) Soldier moral dropped S. Vietnamese corrupting increased Monks and Nuns started burning themselves again POW’s served for years when captured and tortured Less money in US for “Great Society” War was on TV. Lost much support Soldier Moral Dropped Video 9. Why did so many Americans turn against the War in Vietnam when they saw live footage on television? A Nation Divided By the late 60’s, so many men were needed in Vietnam, the Draft was put back into place Many people tried to avoid the draft, the easiest way was college deferment. However, most college students were rich white males. This made a disproportionate amount of African Americans serve in the military 10,000 women also served in Vietnam The United States was split down the middle on the war. Doves – This was a term for people who were against the Vietnam war Hawks – This was a term for people who supported the Vietnam war 10. What caused a disproportionate amount of African Americans serve in the Vietnam war? 1968 Johnson decides its best not to run for President again in 1968. Great Society Suffers. Robert Kennedy assassinated, and Hubert Humphrey was democratic nominee. Humphrey lost to Nixon who promised to get the US out of Vietnam. (Nixon wanted Vietnamization, or a gradual withdrawal from Vietnam so the North Vietnamese wouldn’t be able to take South Vietnam) George Wallace was third party candidate (segregation) 11. Explain the concept behind Vietnamization. Public Opinion turns against the War in Vietnam The War was on Television, and many people saw the brutality of actual war. 1968 – Tet Offensive – On a Vietnamese Holiday, the North Vietnamese almost took over all of South Vietnam in a single day with a surprise attack. This made America realize that North Vietnam isn’t going to back down. 1968 – My Lai Massacre – Marines went into a small town thought to be helping the rebels, and executed many innocent civilians. It was covered up initially. 1970 – Kent State Shootings – Massive Protests against the war on the campus of Kent State. The National Guard opened fire on unarmed students killing 4. 1971 – The Pentagon Papers – documents were released that showed Lyndon Johnson had planned to attack North Vietnam prior to the Tonkin Gulf incident, making the public question whether we should have ever gone to war to begin with. The news Media turned against the war, as well as Walter Cronkite, and LBJ knew that he had officially lost public support 12. What were some of the reasons that America turned against the war between 1968-1971? Protest against Vietnam by America’s Youth Much opposition began to spring up from college students for many reasons They would be drafted if not in college They are in the US and can protest Can get drafted at 18, can’t vote until 21 Thought it was against basic human rights Thought the country was being run by faceless corporations Many Burned Draft cards Protest to Vietnam 13. Why were college-aged kids the most vocal opponents against the war? The End of the War and It’s Legacy Richard Nixon is President, and appoints security advisor Henry Kissinger to complete Vietnamization Wanted to pull out of Vietnam, and not have the Vietcong go on offensive to S. Vietnam, so Nixon bombed N. Vietnam hard to scare them. Along with Laos and Cambodia Nixon pulled out troops, and N. Vietnam quickly took over S. Vietnam Soldiers were not welcomed on their return, many had life-long ailments. 14. Was Vietnamization effective? Explain your answer. Equality for Latinos Latino population tripled from 3 million to 9 million in the 1960’s Latinos rallied behind Cesar Chavez who organized the United Farm Workers Organizing Committee Wanted to unionize in farming industry in heavily Latino populated California La Raza Unida (Mexican Americans United) fought for more rights 15. What were some of the issues that Latinos were facing the in the 1960’s? Equality for American Indians Native Americans have historically had higher alcoholism and unemployment rates than any other American group Organized the American Indian Movement (AIM) Wanted to have the Bureau of Indian Affairs (founded under FDR ADM.) abolished b/c of corruption Became somewhat militant, and was able to get much land back and monetary compensation for lands, property, and rights lost. 16. What were some of the issues Native Americans dealt with at this time? Equality for Women Betty Friedan – The Feminine Mystique – said that many women were unhappy just being a house wife Feminism – belief that women should be equal with men in all aspects of society 1966 – Friedan organized the National Organization for Women (NOW) which called for equality for all women 17.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Uva-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) ‘Whose Vietnam?’ - ‘Lessons learned’ and the dynamics of memory in American foreign policy after the Vietnam War Beukenhorst, H.B. Publication date 2012 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Beukenhorst, H. B. (2012). ‘Whose Vietnam?’ - ‘Lessons learned’ and the dynamics of memory in American foreign policy after the Vietnam War. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:02 Oct 2021 Bibliography Primary sources cited (Archival material, government publications, reports, surveys, etc.) ___________________________________________________________ Ronald Reagan Presidential Library (RRPL), Simi Valley, California NSC 1, February 6, 1981: Executive Secretariat, NSC: folder NSC 1, NSC Meeting Files, Ronald Reagan Presidential Library (RRPL). ‘News clippings’, Folder: ‘Central American Speech April 27, 1983 – May 21, 1983’, Box 2: Central American Speech – Exercise reports, Clark, William P.: Files, Ronald Reagan Presidential Library (RRPL).
    [Show full text]
  • The Pentagon Papers: Secrets of the Vietnam War Adriana Kelly Junior
    The Pentagon Papers: Secrets of The Vietnam War Adriana Kelly Junior Division Paper 1,890 Words 1 The Pentagon Papers are a series of classified government documents leaked by Daniel Ellsberg in 1971. These papers revealed the lies that both the public and Congress were told about the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War, and were essential to the withdrawal from the war. Daniel Ellsberg inspired many other whistleblowers to come forward and break the barriers between the public and the government. The involvement of the United States in Vietnam reaches all the way back to 1946. Vietnam was previously a French colony, but during WWII Japan overthrew the French and gave Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia freedom. When WWII ended in 1945, Japan was removed from the area and Vietnam needed new leadership. Ho Chi Minh, a Vietnamese nationalist with Marxist ideas 1, led a group called the Viet Minh to fight for Vietnamese independence against the French, who were trying to reclaim Vietnam. The United States had to pick a side in this war, which is usually referred to as the First Indochina War. On one hand, the United States wanted to support independence and free Vietnam from French rule. But on the other hand, if Vietnam was independent it would be communist which could trigger something called the domino theory. The domino theory states that if one political event in a country, surrounding countries will follow with similar events. Politicians in America were afraid if Vietnam became communist, surrounding countries like Laos, Cambodia, and Thailand would follow.
    [Show full text]
  • PROTEST ACTIVITIES in SOUTHERN UNIVERSITIES, 1965-1972 Except
    PROTEST ACTIVITIES IN SOUTHERN UNIVERSITIES, 1965-1972 Except where reference is made to the work of others, the work described in this thesis is my own or was done in collaboration with my advisory committee. This thesis does not include proprietary or classified information. ________________________________________ Kristin Elizabeth Grabarek Certificate of Approval: _________________________ ________________________ Angela Lakwete David Carter, Chair Associate Professor Associate Professor History History _________________________ ________________________ Ruth Crocker Stephen L. McFarland Alumni Professor Acting Dean History Graduate School PROTEST ACTIVITIES IN SOUTHERN UNIVERSITIES, 1965-1972 Kristin E. Grabarek A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of History Auburn, Alabama May 11, 2006 PROTEST ACTIVITIES IN SOUTHERN UNIVERSITIES, 1965-1972 Kristin E. Grabarek Permission is granted to Auburn University to make copies of this thesis at its discretion, upon request of individuals or institutions and at their expense. The author reserves all publication rights. ______________________________ Signature of Author May 11, 2006 Date of Graduation iii THESIS ABSTRACT PROTEST ACTIVITIES IN SOUTHERN UNIVERSITIES, 1965-1972 Kristin E. Grabarek Master of History, May 11, 2006 (B.A., Greensboro College, 2003) 162 Typed Pages Directed by Dr. David Carter, Dr. Angela Lakwete, and Dr. Ruth Crocker This thesis examines the existence and character of protest movements in southern universities from the fall of 1965 through the spring of 1972, and offers an explanation for the student dissent in the South in these years while also accounting for its relevance to the study of the anti-Vietnam War and civil rights movements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kent State Shootings After Nearly 50 Years
    The Kent State Shootings after Nearly 50 Years One Lawyer’s Remembrance Sanford Jay roSen Sanford Jay Rosen was the lead attorney for the dead and wounded students of the May 4, 1970, shootings at Kent State. Rosen came to the case in 1977 as lead counsel for the appeal following the victims’ loss of their cases in federal district court in Ohio. After he won the appeal, the cases were sent back to the district court for retrial. Rosen continues to practice law in San Francisco and is a founding partner at the San Francisco law firm Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld, LLP. This piece was written in 2019. To understand my involvement in the Kent State cases, we begin with my father’s mother long before I was born in December 1937. Aida Grudsky was born in the late 1860s in Kiev, Ukraine. In 1905, she fled to America with her husband and two sons from Czarist Russia’s latest oppression of Jews. Neither son survived the journey. Her eldest, born in the United States, also died as a child. Perhaps because of her unspeakable suffering, Aida had an innate sense of injustice, which she passed on to me. My late wife Catherine was born in January 1940, just three weeks af- ter she was smuggled into the United States in her mother’s belly. Pregnant Jewish women were not allowed into the United States on visitors’ visas dur- ing World War II. The Nazis murdered Cathy’s maternal grandmother and that branch of Cathy’s family, except my mother-in-law.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chemical War Without End: Agent Orange in Vietnam
    A Chemical War without End: Agent Orange in Vietnam Marie-Hélène Lavallard* The Vietnam War (1961-1975) is known for the massive bombings of North Vietnam. More insidious, however, yet less well-known to the general public, was the chemical war waged from 1961 to 1971against South Vietnam. An immense environmental disaster and a human catastrophe taking numerous forms: health, economic, socio-cultural …, it had dramatic consequences which are still felt today. The American government and the chemical companies involved have eluded their responsibilities. For years, a conspiracy of silence has obscured the toxicity of the defoliants used. Those responsible have the effrontery to continue denying it today. Humanitarian aid is incommensurate with the needs. It is at the government level that support for Vietnam must be organized and the demand for just reparations must be made. During the Vietnam War, from 1961 to 1971, American aviation sprayed defoliants over Southern Vietnam to chase from the jungle the combatants taking shelter there, to cut the Ho Chi Minh trail by which weapons, supplies and medication came down from the North, to facilitate surveillance of roads, coastlines and waterways and to destroy the rice paddies, forcing villagers into "strategic hamlets" and thus depriving the guerillas of food and aid1. More than 77 million2 liters of defoliants were released by plane (95%), by helicopter, by boat, by tanker truck, and by men with backpack sprayers. More than 2,500,000 hectares were contaminated by these defoliants, the best known of which is Agent Orange. It contains dioxin, one of the most violent and most indestructible poisons known.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam Case Study
    Elite Bargains and Political Deals Project: Vietnam Case Study Jeffrey H. Michaels Stabilisation Unit February 2018 This report has been produced by an independent expert. The views contained within do not necessarily reflect UK government policy. Author details The author is a Senior Lecturer, Defence Studies Department, Kings College London. This case study draws on a combination of primary and secondary sources. The primary sources are mainly limited to US Government documents, particularly those dealing with the internal deliberations of the Nixon administration as well as the minutes of meetings at the 1972-1973 Paris peace talks. The secondary sources used include a much wider range, such as general histories of the conflict, as well as more specific diplomatic histories that draw on primary source material from each of the key participants in the conflict (US, North Vietnam, South Vietnam, Provisional Revolutionary Government, USSR and China). Background to Elite Bargains and Political Deals Project This case study is one of a series commissioned to support the Stabilisation Unit’s (SU’s) development of an evidence base relating to elite bargains and political deals. The project explores how national and international interventions have and have not been effective in fostering and sustaining political deals and elite bargains; and whether or not these political deals and elite bargains have helped reduce violence, increased local, regional and national stability and contributed to the strengthening of the relevant political settlement. Drawing on the case studies, the SU has developed a series of summary papers that bring together the project’s key findings and will underpin the revision of the existing ‘UK Approach to Stabilisation’ (2014) paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Agent Orange Understand the VA Claims Process
    The American Legion FILING A VA CLAIM CONTACT INFORMATION The American Legion offers a free Claims Coach • The American Legion National Headquarters, app that helps veterans and their surviving spouses 202-861-2700 (Washington Office) legion.org Agent Orange understand the VA claims process. The app’s step- • Department of Veterans Affairs VA Benefits Call by-step process allows users to find a service officer Center, 800-827-1000 Benefits&Programs nearby, create a checklist, set appointment remind- • VA Health Care, 877-222-8387 ers and manage claims. To download the app, visit A guide for those who served in Vietnam, legion.org/mobileapps. • Agent Orange updates and information Korea and Thailand, and their families va.gov/agentorange The Claims Coach can also be accessed via computer by going to legion.org/mobileapps and clicking on “use the SPINA BIFIDA CONTACTS Claims Coach on your desktop.” • Veterans Health Administration (VHA) 800-733-8387 To locate an accredited American Legion Department Service Officer, go to legion.org/serviceofficer. • Shriners Hospital for Children 800-237-5055 or shrinershq.org ELIGIBILITY FOR AGENT ORANGE RELATED JOIN THE LEGION HEALTH CARE A Vietnam-era herbicide-exposed veteran does not have At about 2 million strong, The American Legion is the largest veterans service organization in the world. to be rated service-connected to be eligible for Agent Every day, The American Legion works for veterans, Orange related health care. A Vietnam-era herbicide-ex- their families and the communities in which they live. posed veteran is eligible notwithstanding that there is in- To join The American Legion, please visit legion.org/join.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States' Chemical Defoliant Use During the Vietnam War and Its
    ABSTRACT OATSVALL, NEIL SHAFER. War on Nature, War on Bodies: The United States’ Chemical Defoliant Use During the Vietnam War and Its Consequences. (Under the direction of Matthew Morse Booker.) During most of the Vietnam War, from 1961-1971, the United States military sprayed chemical defoliants on a significant part of the Vietnamese environment in order to gain a military advantage. US forces used these chemicals in an attempt to substitute technology and financial resources for manpower to triumph over a relatively technologically deficient enemy. This effort, dubbed “Operation Ranch Hand,” wrought incredible destruction not only on Vietnam’s natural setting, but also on everyone involved; Vietnamese and American, civilian and soldier. This work examines the consequences of defoliation, and aims to show that those outcomes proved more severe in both scale and efficacy than any anticipated results. It differs from previous studies by combining environmental, military, medical, and cultural factors and considering them as interrelated. Whenever possible this study also tries to bring in a Vietnamese perspective, though that is often impossible due to a lack of available evidence in English. In this war, the United States treated not only the Vietnamese Communists as enemies but also assaulted the natural environment as foe. The interconnections forged during this complicated interpretation of nature and enemy are essential to the study of Operation Ranch Hand and chemical defoliation operations. Nature mattered to both sides, and an
    [Show full text]
  • Military Advisors in Vietnam: 1963
    Military Advisors in Vietnam: 1963 Topic: Vietnam Grade Level: 9-12 Subject Area: US History after World War II Time Required: 1 class period Goals/Rationale In the winter of 1963, the eyes of most Americans were not on Vietnam. However, Vietnam would soon become a battleground familiar to all Americans. In this lesson plan, students analyze a letter to President Kennedy from a woman who had just lost her brother in South Vietnam and consider Kennedy’s reply, explaining his rationale for sending US military personnel there. Essential Question: What were the origins of US involvement in Vietnam prior to its engagement of combat troops? Objectives Students will: analyze primary sources. discuss US involvement in the Vietnam conflict prior to 1963. evaluate the “domino theory” from the historical perspective of Americans living in 1963. Connections to Curriculum (Standards) National Standards: National Center for History in the Schools Era 9 - Postwar United States (1945 to early 1970s), 2B - The student understands United States foreign policy in Africa, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. Era 9, 2C - The student understands the foreign and domestic consequences of US involvement in Vietnam. Massachusetts Frameworks US II.20 – Explain the causes, course and consequences of the Vietnam War and summarize the diplomatic and military policies of Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon. Prior Knowledge Students should have a working knowledge of the Cold War. They should be able to analyze primary sources. Prepared by the Department of Education and Public Programs, John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum Historical Background and Context After World War II, the French tried to re-establish their colonial control over Vietnam, the most strategic of the three states comprising the former Indochina (Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos).
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Sheet 8: the Use of Defoliants – Agent Orange
    Fact Sheet 8: The use of defoliants – Agent Orange A highly controversial aspect of the Vietnam War was the widespread use of herbicides by the United States military. These chemicals caused the leaves of trees in the jungle to die. This made it easier to detect enemy positions and activities, especially from the air. Crops were also sprayed to deprive the enemy of food. These chemicals included the ‘Rainbow Herbicides’ – Agent Pink, Agent Green, Agent Purple, Agent Blue, Agent White and, most famously, Agent Orange. The US Air Force sprayed approximately 75 million litres (of which Agent Orange accounted for about 45 million litres) of concentrated herbicides, affecting an estimated 13% of South Vietnam's land. Humans exposed to Agent Orange were at risk of poisoning. Some estimates suggest that there were as many as 4 million victims of dioxin poisoning in Vietnam. Veterans of the war observed an increased risk of various types of cancer, while birth defects among their children were cited as evidence of the long-term harm caused by Agent Orange. The US government denied any conclusive scientific links between Agent Orange and health problems experienced by those exposed. In 1984 US veterans obtained a $180 million settlement from companies which produced Agent Orange. A small trust fund for New Zealanders who had been exposed was established as part of this settlement, but the fund was exhausted before the health problems of many veterans became apparent. The New Zealand government initially stated that no New Zealanders were deployed in areas where defoliants were used. A 2001 report found no evidence that exposure to defoliants had affected the health of veterans' children, although it did bring new evidence of exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetoric and Reality
    History Studies Volume 13 History Studies Volume 13 information on Walsh, but he was still dismissed by the Catholic Church. After his sacking Jimmy Walsh was Rhetoric and Reality -A History of the Formation employed as a hospital porter, but spent the rest of his life of the 'Domino Theory' trying to enter various religious orders, becoming a novice in a Luke Butterly Benedictine Monastery. He was unsuccessful in these attempts Gaps between rhetoric and reality in U.S. foreign however because he had once been married and was now policy have often been large; indeed such gaps might be said to constitute a defining characteristic of this separated. Jimmy Walsh died after a prolonged illness on 12 nation's diplomacy. I March 1977. and was buried in Sydney. He had never returned 76 to treland. When U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower announced the 'domino theory' at a news conference in 1954, he was not announcing a radical departure in Washington's understanding of the emerging situation in Indochina. Rather, he was making public aspects of U.S. foreign policy that had been in the making since the end of World War ll, which in turn interacted with older themes. This essay will first situate this 'theory' in the historiography of the Vietnam War in order to contextualise what follows. It will then map the formation of the domino theory from 1945 to 1954, and will briefly look at the broader implications of such an approach in foreign policy. This will be achieved by examining the secondary literature on the various historical events covered and reviewing the relevant primary sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Section Summary 16 the WAR’S END and IMPACT SECTION 4
    Name Class Date CHAPTER Section Summary 16 THE WAR’S END AND IMPACT SECTION 4 When Nixon became President, he believed that a peace deal could READING CHECK be negotiated with North Vietnam. When these negotiations stalled, however, Nixon gradually began to pull American troops out of How many American troops Vietnam. He believed that the South Vietnamese Army should fight were killed in Vietnam? on its own and called this approach Vietnamization. He hoped that American supplies to the South Vietnamese Army would be suffi- cient for the army to secure and hold South Vietnam. In 1970, however, Nixon ordered a ground attack on communists in Cambodia, which angered antiwar activists at home who claimed that Nixon was widening the war, not ending it. Protests erupted on many college campuses. At Kent State University, members of the National Guard fired into a group of protesters, killing four. This led to demonstrations on other campuses, including Jackson State in Mississippi, where two students were killed. Other events also outraged the public. American troops killed VOCABULARY STRATEGY over four hundred unarmed Vietnamese in the village of My Lai. What does the word induced The Pentagon Papers showed that the government had been dishon- mean in the underlined sen- est with the public and with Congress about the Vietnam War. tence? Circle the words in the American bombing finally induced the North Vietnamese to underlined sentence that could resume negotiations. In January 1973, the United States, South help you learn what induced Vietnam, North Vietnam, and the Vietcong signed the Paris Peace means.
    [Show full text]