Ships Between African and North American Species of the Tribe Loteae (Papilionaceae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ships Between African and North American Species of the Tribe Loteae (Papilionaceae) Lotus roudairei Bonnet and taxonomic relation­ ships between African and North American species of the tribe Loteae (Papilionaceae) Tatjana E. KRAMINA Higher Plants Department, Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, 119899 Moscow, Russia. [email protected] Dmitry D. SOKOLOFF Higher Plants Department, Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, 119899 Moscow, Russia. [email protected] ABSTRACT A comparative analysis of morphological features in NW African Lotus rou­ dairei, N American Lotus sect. Simpeteria, and American Lotus sect. Microlotus (= gen. Acmispon s. str.) was carried out. According to the data obtained, these three taxa seemed not to form the distinct genus or subgenus KEYWORDS Lotus roudairei, Acmispon sensu P. LASSEN (1986). A new section Pseudosimpeteria with a Papilionaceae, single species, L. roudairei, is described within the Old World Lotus subgen. Loteae, Lotus. The relationships between Old World and New World Loteae are Africa, N America. briefly discussed. RÉSUMÉ Une analyse morphologique comparative de Lotus roudairei nord-ouest-afri­ cain, Lotus sect. Simpeteria nord-américain et Lotus sect. Microlotus (= gen. Acmispon s. str.) américain a été réalisée. En partant des données obtenues, il apparaît que ces 3 taxons ne peuvent pas former un genre (ou sous-genre) particulier, Acmispon sensu P. LASSEN (1986). Une section nouvelle MOTS CLÉS Lotus roudairei, Pseudosimpeteria, avec une seule espèce L. roudairei, est décrite dans le genre Papilionaceae, Lotus subgen. Lotus, répandu dans l'Ancien Monde. Les relations entre les Loteae, Loteae de l'Ancien Monde et ceux du Nouveau Monde sont brièvement dis- Afrique, N Amérique. sér. 3 • 1997 • 19(2) 321 Kramina T.E. & Sokoloff D.D. INTRODUCTION Generally, the native N American species of Lotus s.l. are distributed from Mexico to S The taxonomic boundaries of the genus Lotus Canada and from the Atlantic to Pacific coasts; remain one of the most complicated issues in the the only native S American species occurs in intetgenetic delimitation of the tribe Loteae. In a Chile. The section Simpeteria contains 2-3 btoad sense, the genus comprises, according to annual and 10 perennial species in the SW part diffetent views, from 100 species (POLHILL 1981) of U.S.A. (Arizona, California, Colorado, to 176 species (KlRKBRlDE 1994) on all conti­ Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Utah), and in nents except the Antarctic. The majority of spe­ Mexico, south to Veracruz and Puebla. The spe­ cies occut in the Meditettanean tegion, cies tend to be geographically separated from Macaronesia, and in the western patt of North each othet, e.g. two endemic species occur in America, especially in California. All native Mexico, one in Nevada, and one in Arizona. The North-American species of Loteae belong to the center of diversity of sect. Simpeteria is located in genus Lotus in the broadest sense. Mexico and Arizona. The section Microlotus A number of authors disagree with the broad contains about 8 annual species primarily in concept of the genus Lotus and tend to bteak it Western N America (British Columbia, up into several separate genera. In particular the Washington, Oregon, California, Arizona, New taxonomic position of North-American species Mexico, and Mexico). One species, L. subpinna- has been disputed. The review of the discussion tus Lag., is however, restricted to Chile, and one was presented by OTTLEY (1923) and CALLEN species, L. unifoliolatus (Hook.) Benth. has a (1959). OTTLEY (1923) recognized four main wide area of disttibution, extending from approaches to the taxonomy of N American Mexico, Texas and Arkansas to British Columbia Loteae. and Manitoba, and from the Pacific coast to North and South Carolina. In contrast with sect. 1. All N American species should be included Simpeteria, sect. Microlotus has a center of diver­ in the Old World genus Lotus. sity in California, and all the species reported for 2. All N American species should be treated as a United States occur also in California. Even the distinct genus Hosackia Dougl. ex Benth. Chilean L. subpinnatus is very close to L. wrange- 3. American species should be excluded from lianus Fisch. & Mey. from California, and some­ Lotus of the Old World and segregated into seve­ times the two species ate merged. The members ral genera: Hosackia, Acmispon Rafl, Syrmatium of subgenera Hosackia and Syrmatium, which are Vogel, and Anisolotus Bernh. not the subject of this papet, occur in Western N 4. The genus Hosackia should include the America, from British Columbia and Idaho to majority of American species, whereas remaining Mexico. species should be left within the Old World genus Lotus. OTTLEY (1923) accepted a broad concept of the According to GlLLETT (1958), only one insigni­ genus Lotus and tecognized three subgenera in ficant trait separates Old Wotld Lotus species America: subgen. Hosackia Ottley (syn. gen. from American Loteae, viz. leaf morphology. Old Hosackia Dougl. ex Benth. s. stt.), subgen. World species have five leaflets, with the lower Acmispon Ottley (syn. gen. Acmispon Rafl, gen. pair (of which one leaflet is occasionally absent) Anisolotus Bernh.), and subgen. Syrmatium Ottley situated at the base of the tachis, simulating (syn. gen. Syrmatium Vogel). Species of the first foliaceous stipules, very close to the true stipules subgenus have membranaceous or foliaceous sti­ which, if present, are reduced to glands. Less pules, while in the remaining two subgenera they often, they have three leaflets, with petiolules but are glandulai. Subgen. Syrmatium differs from without petiole or rachis. American species have subgen. Hosackia and subgen. Acmispon by the three leaflets with a definite petiole or rachis, or indéhiscent fruits. Later OTTLEY (1944) recogni­ 4-19 leaflets, pinnately arranged, often alternate, zed two sections—Microlotus Benth. and the lowest one situated above the base of the Simpeteria Ottley—in subgen. Acmispon. tachis and well separated from the glandulat or 322 ADANSONIA, sér. 3 • 1997 • 19(2) Lotus roudairei (Papilionaceae) membranaceous stipules. GlLLETT (1958) noted The name "Acmispon roudairef is accepted by that "even this definition fails for L. roudairei LOCK (1989) and by GREUTER et al. (1989). On Bonnet from Morocco which has up to 6 alter­ the other hand, LEBRUN & STORK (1992) and nately pinnate leaflets, the lowest well above the KlRKBRlDE (1994) again place the species in the base of the rachis and separated from the glandu­ genus Lotus; it is not clear however whether these lar stipules just as in Hosackia" (p. 363). COSSON authors include L. roudairei in sect. Simpeteria. named this species "L. bosackioides" (in herb.) thus implying a similarity to American species. BONNET (1893), describing L. roudairei in accor­ MATERIAL AND METHODS dance with the rules of botanical nomenclature, also compared it with North American Hosackia. The work is based on the study of herbarium The species is distributed in the W of N Africa specimens from herbaria LE, MHA, and P. The (Morocco, Algeria, and Tunisia), and in adjacent following American species were studied: sect. parts of Tropical Africa. Simpeteria: L. argyraeus (Greene) Greene, MAIRE et al. (1935) described a new species, L. L. grandiflorus (Benth.) Greene, L. greenei Ottley, simonae Maire, Weiller & Wilczek from the SE L. mearnsii (Britton) Greene, L. oroboides foothills of the Anti-Atlas mountains in Morocco (Humboldt, Bonpland & Kunth) Ottley, L. rigi- and included it, along with L. roudairei, in the dus (Benth.) Greene, L. strigosus (Nuttal ex proposed new section Stipulati Maire, Weiller & Torrey & A. Gray) Greene, L. tomentellus Wilczek. Recognition of sect. Stipulati was based Greene, L. utahensis Ottley, L. wrightii (A. Gray) on a single feature, the presence of true stipules Greene; sect. Microlotus: L. denticulatus (Drew) reduced to small dark glands. MONOD (1980) Greene, L. humistratus Greene, L. micranthus justly noted that not only L. simonae and L. rou­ Benth., L. salsuginosus Greene, L. subpinnatus dairei, but a number of Old World Lotus species, Lag., L. unifoliolatus (Hook.) Benth. [L. purshia- demonstrated glandular stipules, and therefore nus (Benth.) Clements & Clements], L. wrange- rejected the sect. Stipulati. According to LASSEN lianus Fisch. & Mey. (1986), L. simonae and L. roudairei have nothing For the study of floral morphology flowers were in common except the structure of the stipules; placed for two days into a mixture of equal parts in floral and vegetative characters L. simonae is a of glycerin, ethyl alcohol and water, and then true Lotus. LASSEN (1986, 1989) accepted at least dissected. For the study of ovule arrangement two genera of N American Loteae, namely and orientation additional material was used, Hosackia and Acmispon. He recognized sect. namely the herbarium specimens from MW, and Simpeteria within the genus Acmispon in accor­ flowers of L. corniculatus L., L. krylovii Schischk. dance with OTTLEY'S classification, where the & Serg., L. ucrainicus Klok., fixed in 70% ethyl section was included in subgen. Acmispon. alcohol in the field from several locations in LASSEN (1986) transferred L. roudairei to European Russia, Ukraine, and Kazakhstan. Acmispon sect. Simpeteria (Ottley) Lassen making a new combination, Acmispon roudairei (Bonnet) Lassen. Since sect. Stipulati had been described RESULTS AND DISCUSSION earlier than sect. Simpeteria, he selected L. simonae as lectotype of sect. Stipulati so that the latter A comparative morphological study of Lotus name would not interfere with OTTLEY's epithet1. roudairei and New World Loteae does not sup­ port the conclusion of LASSEN (1986), that L. roudairei belongs to the N American sect. Simpeteria. 1. LASSEN also reported, that he had studied the lectotype of L. simonae In MPU. Lectotyplflcatlon Is, however, not needed, OTTLEY (1944) gave a short and clear diagnosis because the type specimen exists ("[Morocco, prov. Tatta.] In of sect. Simpeteria: "Herbae vel suffrutices; carina alveo lapldoso amnls Bouzezza ad septentr. oasis Tatta ad obtusa, quam alis breviore; vexillo sine ungue; radices merldlonales Anti Atlantis. 730 m. 3 apr. 1934. Maire et Wilczek.", PI).
Recommended publications
  • Acmispon Helleri Notes
    Sorrie, B.A. 2015. Notes on morphology of Acmispon helleri (Fabaceae). Phytoneuron 2015-44. 1–3. Published 15 July 2015. ISSN 2153 733X NOTES ON MORPHOLOGY OF ACMISPON HELLERI (FABACEAE) BRUCE A. SORRIE University of North Carolina Herbarium North Carolina Botanical Garden Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-3280 ABSTRACT Recent field observations of Acmispon helleri in North Carolina point out a number of discrepancies or omissions regarding published descriptions, including stem color and pubescence, leaflet morphology and vestiture, and corolla color. Degree of foliation strongly corresponds with phenology –– loss of leaves and leaflets over time appears to be common. Acmispon helleri (Britt.) A.A. Heller is the eastern segregate of the western and midwestern A. americanus (Nutt.) Rydb. and is restricted to scattered locations in the piedmont of south-central Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, and northeastern Georgia (Weakley 2015). It was formerly placed within Lotus, sometimes as a full species, sometimes as a variety (see Brouillet 2008 and Weakley 2015 for synonymy). Observations of living plants at sites in the lower piedmont of Union County, North Carolina, in 2010 suggest that several morphological characters are at variance with published descriptions. The most detailed description available is that of Wilbur (1963); also very helpful are the illustrations in Chafin (2007). Radford, Ahles, and Bell (1968) followed Wilbur in writing their description. 1. Stem color. Neither Wilbur nor Radford, Ahles, and Bell mention this. In the Union County plants, stems are wholly reddish brown. Branches are green, but often reddish brown basally. 2. Pubescence of stems and branches. Wilbur: stems and branches are "glabrate (especially below) to moderately spreading villous-pubescent." In the Union County plants, stems are sparsely to moderately villous throughout and branches moderately to densely villous.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • A New Combination in Acmispon (Fabaceae: Loteae) for California Luc Brouillet Université De Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 28 | Issue 1 Article 6 2010 A New Combination in Acmispon (Fabaceae: Loteae) for California Luc Brouillet Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Brouillet, Luc (2010) "A New Combination in Acmispon (Fabaceae: Loteae) for California," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 28: Iss. 1, Article 6. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol28/iss1/6 Aliso, 28, p. 63 ’ 2010, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden A NEW COMBINATION IN ACMISPON (FABACEAE: LOTEAE) FOR CALIFORNIA LUC BROUILLET Herbier Marie-Victorin, Institut de recherche en biologie ve´ge´tale, Universite´de Montre´al, 4101 Sherbrooke St. E, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H1X 2B2 ([email protected]) ABSTRACT The new combination Acmispon argophyllus (A.Gray) Brouillet var. niveus (Greene) Brouillet is made. Key words: Acmispon, California, Fabaceae, Loteae, North America, Santa Cruz Island. Acmispon argophyllus (A.Gray) Brouillet var. niveus (Greene) Variety niveus is a northern Channel Islands (California) Brouillet, comb. et stat. nov.—TYPE: California. Santa endemic that is distinguished from the closely related southern Cruz Island [s.d.], E.L. Greene s.n. (holotype CAS!, isotype Channel Islands endemic var. adsurgens (Dunkle) Brouillet by (part of type) UC!). stems ascending to erect (vs. erect), less crowded leaves, a silky (vs. silvery) indumentum, smaller umbels (6–10 vs. 10–13 Basionym: Syrmatium niveum Greene, Bull. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2: 148 flowers), and slightly longer calyx lobes (2.5–5.0 vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Genus Lotus (Leguminosae, Loteae): Evidence from Nrits Sequences and Morphology
    813 Phylogeny of the genus Lotus (Leguminosae, Loteae): evidence from nrITS sequences and morphology G.V. Degtjareva, T.E. Kramina, D.D. Sokoloff, T.H. Samigullin, C.M. Valiejo-Roman, and A.S. Antonov Abstract: Lotus (120–130 species) is the largest genus of the tribe Loteae. The taxonomy of Lotus is complicated, and a comprehensive taxonomic revision of the genus is needed. We have conducted phylogenetic analyses of Lotus based on nrITS data alone and combined with data on 46 morphological characters. Eighty-one ingroup nrITS accessions represent- ing 71 Lotus species are studied; among them 47 accessions representing 40 species are new. Representatives of all other genera of the tribe Loteae are included in the outgroup (for three genera, nrITS sequences are published for the first time). Forty-two of 71 ingroup species were not included in previous morphological phylogenetic studies. The most important conclusions of the present study are (1) addition of morphological data to the nrITS matrix produces a better resolved phy- logeny of Lotus; (2) previous findings that Dorycnium and Tetragonolobus cannot be separated from Lotus at the generic level are well supported; (3) Lotus creticus should be placed in section Pedrosia rather than in section Lotea; (4) a broad treatment of section Ononidium is unnatural and the section should possibly not be recognized at all; (5) section Heineke- nia is paraphyletic; (6) section Lotus should include Lotus conimbricensis; then the section is monophyletic; (7) a basic chromosome number of x = 6 is an important synapomorphy for the expanded section Lotus; (8) the segregation of Lotus schimperi and allies into section Chamaelotus is well supported; (9) there is an apparent functional correlation be- tween stylodium and keel evolution in Lotus.
    [Show full text]
  • Fruits and Seeds of Genera in the Subfamily Faboideae (Fabaceae)
    Fruits and Seeds of United States Department of Genera in the Subfamily Agriculture Agricultural Faboideae (Fabaceae) Research Service Technical Bulletin Number 1890 Volume I December 2003 United States Department of Agriculture Fruits and Seeds of Agricultural Research Genera in the Subfamily Service Technical Bulletin Faboideae (Fabaceae) Number 1890 Volume I Joseph H. Kirkbride, Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L. Weitzman Fruits of A, Centrolobium paraense E.L.R. Tulasne. B, Laburnum anagyroides F.K. Medikus. C, Adesmia boronoides J.D. Hooker. D, Hippocrepis comosa, C. Linnaeus. E, Campylotropis macrocarpa (A.A. von Bunge) A. Rehder. F, Mucuna urens (C. Linnaeus) F.K. Medikus. G, Phaseolus polystachios (C. Linnaeus) N.L. Britton, E.E. Stern, & F. Poggenburg. H, Medicago orbicularis (C. Linnaeus) B. Bartalini. I, Riedeliella graciliflora H.A.T. Harms. J, Medicago arabica (C. Linnaeus) W. Hudson. Kirkbride is a research botanist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Systematic Botany and Mycology Laboratory, BARC West Room 304, Building 011A, Beltsville, MD, 20705-2350 (email = [email protected]). Gunn is a botanist (retired) from Brevard, NC (email = [email protected]). Weitzman is a botanist with the Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, Washington, DC. Abstract Kirkbride, Joseph H., Jr., Charles R. Gunn, and Anna L radicle junction, Crotalarieae, cuticle, Cytiseae, Weitzman. 2003. Fruits and seeds of genera in the subfamily Dalbergieae, Daleeae, dehiscence, DELTA, Desmodieae, Faboideae (Fabaceae). U. S. Department of Agriculture, Dipteryxeae, distribution, embryo, embryonic axis, en- Technical Bulletin No. 1890, 1,212 pp. docarp, endosperm, epicarp, epicotyl, Euchresteae, Fabeae, fracture line, follicle, funiculus, Galegeae, Genisteae, Technical identification of fruits and seeds of the economi- gynophore, halo, Hedysareae, hilar groove, hilar groove cally important legume plant family (Fabaceae or lips, hilum, Hypocalypteae, hypocotyl, indehiscent, Leguminosae) is often required of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lotus Scoparius (Nutt. in Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley [= Acmispon Glaber
    SPECIES Lotus scoparius (Nutt. in Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley [= Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet] NRCS CODE: Tribe: Loteae LOSC2 Subfamily: Papilionoideae LOSCS2 Family: Fabaceae LOSCB Order: Fabales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida LOSCB , Riverside Co., A. Montalvo 2009 LOSCS2, Monterey coast, A. Montalvo 2003 LOSCB, Riverside Co., A. Montalvo 2010, Subspecific taxa 1. LOSCS2 1. Lotus scoparius var. scoparius 2. LOSCB 2. Lotus scoparius (Nutt.) Ottley var. brevialatus Ottley Synonyms 1. Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet var. glaber [New name in Jepson Manual 2nd Edition, JepsonOnline 2010] Hosackia scoparia Nutt. in T. and G. (taxa numbered as above) H. glaber Greene H. crassifolia Nutt., not Benth L. glaber Greene, not Mill. L. scoparius (Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley L. scoparius (Nutt. in T. & G.) Ottley ssp. scoparius (Ottley) Munz Lotus scoparius (Nutt.) Ottley var. perplexans Hoover p.p. Syrmatium glabrum Vogel 2. Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet var. brevialatus (Ottley) Brouillet [New name in Jepson Manual 2nd Edition] Hosackia glabra (Vogel) Torr. var. brevialata (Ottley) Abrams Lotus scoparius (Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley var. brevialatus Ottley Lotus scoparius (Nutt. in T. & G.) Ottley ssp. brevialatus (Ottley) Munz Common name General for species: California broom, deerweed 1. coastal deerweed, common deerweed (taxa numbered as above) 2. desert deerweed, western bird's foot trefoil, short-winged deerweed (Roberts 2008, Painter 2009, USDA PLANTS 2010). Over 45 taxa of Lotus were recognized in Isely's treatment in Hickman (1993) for California. These taxa had been grouped and regrouped into various species as well as subgenera or genera based on morphology for over a century. Allan & Porter (2000) analyzed DNA (ITS and nuclear ribosomal DNA), geographic, and morphological data for more than 45 taxa of Lotus together with additional related taxa of Loteae and found several geographically distinct lineages.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Studies in Tribe Loteae (Fabaceae) in Egypt. I: Subtribe Anthyllidinae (Anthyllis, Hymenocarpos and Tripodion) Zaki A
    39 Egypt. J. Bot. Vol. 59, No.2, pp. 523 - 536 (2019) Taxonomic Studies in Tribe Loteae (Fabaceae) in Egypt. I: Subtribe Anthyllidinae (Anthyllis, Hymenocarpos and Tripodion) Zaki A. Turki, Faiza A. Shehata#, Esam M. Aqlan Botany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Menoufia University, Shebein El-Koom, Egypt. HE PLANT morphology, anatomical characters of stem and leaves, SEM of seed coat Tsurfaces were used to reassess the conflicted taxonomic relationships between the genera Anthyllis, Hymenocarpos and Tripodion. Previous studies treated the genera Hymenocarpos and Tripodion as synonyms to Anthyllis. The present study clearly indicated considerably differences between the three genera. The most important characters used to distinguish the studied genera are habit, inflorescence type, bract shape, calyx, pod shape and seed coat pattern. On the bases of morphology, anatomy and seed characters, three distinct genera, Anthyllis, Hymenocarpos and Tripodion are represented in the Egyptian flora, each with only one species. Keywords: Anthyllis, Hymenocarpos, Tripodion, Morphological, Anatomy, SEM seed. Introduction Hymenocarpos as synonymy to Circinus. Lassen (1986, 1987) has shown that Tripodion is an earlier The genus Anthyllis L. and Hymenocarpos Savi. name for Physanthyllis and recognized three are two genera of the family Fabaceae, belonging species in Tripodion. Akulova (1985, 1986) and to the subfamily Faboideae Rudd., tribe Loteae Sokoloff (2003 a, b) included Hymenocarpos as DC., subtribe Anthyllidinae W.D.J. Koch. The two synonymy to Anthyllis. genera distributed in Mediterranean regions, with some taxa extending into northern Europe, the In Egypt, Täckholm (1974) recognized genus Atlantic islands, Northern and Eastern Africa, and Anthyllis into A. tetraphylla and A.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Plant Propagation Protocol
    Plant Propagation Protocol for Lotus aboriginus Jeps. ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production Protocol URL: https://courses.washington.edu/esrm412/protocols/LOAB.pdf © 1995 Saint Mary's College of California7 North American Distribution1 Washington Distribution1 TAXONOMY Plant Family Scientific Name Fabaceae1 Common Name Pea family1 Species Scientific Name Scientific Name Lotus aboriginus Jeps.1 Varieties Sub-species Cultivar Common Synonym(s) Hosackia rosea Eastw.1 Lotus crassifolius (Benth.) Greene var. subglaber (Ottley) C.L. Hitchc.1 Lotus stipularis (Benth.) Greene var. subglaber Ottley1 Common Name(s) rosy bird’s-foot trefoil1, thicket trefoil2, rose flowered lotus3, rosy lotus7 Species Code (as per USDA Plants LOAB database) GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range In North America, L. aboriginus is only found along the west coast of the United States, in Washington, Oregon, and California1,2. In Washington, L. aboriginus is found only in 7 counties on the western side of the state: Jefferson, Grays Harbor, Pacific, Mason, Kitsap, Thurston, and Pierce. It is similarly found in western counties of Oregon and northern California1. See maps above. Ecological distribution L. aboriginus is found in grasslands and forests4. Climate and elevation range 60-1200 m4 Local habitat and abundance L. aboriginus grows in woods, coastal mountains, and disturbed habitat such as along roadsides4, as well as on banks, streamsides, burns, and logged areas5. Plant strategy type / successional stage Plant characteristics L. aboriginus is a forb, dicot, and perennial herb1,3,4. The stem can be either spreading or erect, and 1-7 dm in height5 with alternating leaves8. The stipules of its leaves are scarious, inconspicuous, and fragile5.
    [Show full text]
  • Acmispon Glaber (Vogel) Brouillet [Updated 2017] = Lotus Scoparius (Nutt
    I. SPECIES Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet [Updated 2017] = Lotus scoparius (Nutt. in Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley NRCS CODE: [none for Tribe: Loteae Family: Fabaceae Subclass: Rosidae Acmispon] Subfamily: Papilionoideae Order: Fabales Class: Magnoliopsida [LOSC2 code for L. 4 mm scoparius ] Acmispon glaber var. brevialatus [= Lotus scoparius var. brevialatus] 15 mm seedling with linear cotyledons and first pair of true leaves 4 mm Acmispon glaber var. glaber erect form prostrate form on Monterey coast A. Subspecific taxa 1. no NRCS code 1. Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet var. glaber 2. no NRCS code 2. Acmispon glaber (Vogel) Brouillet var. brevialatus (Ottley) Brouillet [accepted by Baldwin et al. (2012), Jepson eFlora (2017)] B. Common name General for species: deerweed, California broom 1. coastal deerweed, common deerweed, deerweed, coastal deerbroom (taxa numbered as above; 2. short-winged deerweed, desert deerweed, desert deerbroom, western bird's foot trefoil names listed first used below) (Roberts 2008, Allen & Roberts 2013, Calflora 2016, USDA PLANTS 2016). Last modified: 10/19/2018 LOSC2 Update, 1 Printed: 10/19/2018 C. Synonyms 1. LOSCS2 1. Lotus scoparius (Nutt.) Ottley var. scoparius Hosackia scoparia Nutt. in T. and G. H. glaber Greene H. crassifolia Nutt., not Benth L. glaber Greene, not Mill. L. scoparius (Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley L. scoparius (Nutt. in T. & G.) Ottley ssp. scoparius (Ottley) Munz Lotus scoparius (Nutt.) Ottley var. perplexans Hoover p.p. Syrmatium glabrum Vogel 2. LOSCB 2. Lotus scoparius (Nutt.) Ottley var. brevialatus Ottley (taxa numbered as above) Hosackia glabra (Vogel) Torr. var. brevialata (Ottley) Abrams Lotus scoparius (Torr. & A. Gray) Ottley var. brevialatus Ottley Lotus scoparius (Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution, Variation and Systematics (Part 2): Systematics & Nomenclature
    EVOLUTION, VARIATION AND SYSTEMATICS (PART 2): SYSTEMATICS & NOMENCLATURE Niarsi Merry Hemelda, M.Si. Reference Simpson, M.G. 2006. Plant systematics. Chapter 16 Systematics A science that includes and encompasses traditional taxonomy: the description, identification, nomenclature, and classification of organisms, and that has as its primary goal the reconstruction of phylogeny, or evolutionary history, of life. 2 major means of arriving at classification of life Phenetic Phylogenetic based on overall similarities. based on evolutionary history, or pattern of descent, Similar objects are grouped which may or may not together and dissimilar objects apart. correspond to overall similarity What is Nomenclature? Assignment of plant names utilizing a formal system. What is name of work providing the rules and recommendation for plant nomenclature? International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN) (formerly International Code of Botanical Nomenclature -- ICBN) WHO FIRST CONSISTENTLY USED BINOMIALS? Linnaeus What is the correct form of binomials? Binomial = “two names” Quercus dumosa Nuttall Quercus = genus name (capitalized) dumosa = specific epithet (not capitalized) Quercus dumosa = species name Nuttall = author THE REASONS THAT COMMON NAMES ARE DISADVANTAGEOUS (1): 1. Only scientific names are universal, used the same world-wide. Apel (Indonesia) Apple (English) 林檎 Ringo (Japanese) 苹果 Píngguǒ (Chinese) 사과 sagwa (Korean) la pomme (French) яблоко yabloko (Russian) etc. Malus domestica THE REASONS THAT COMMON NAMES ARE DISADVANTAGEOUS (2): 2. Common names are not consistent. A taxon may have more than one One common name may refer to common name more than one taxon “Hemlock” Known as: • Chamise • greasewood Adenostoma fasciculatum Tsuga spp. Conium maculatum THE REASONS THAT COMMON NAMES ARE DISADVANTAGEOUS (3): 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Relationships Between Old World
    © Landesmuseum für Kärnten; download www.landesmuseum.ktn.gv.at/wulfenia; www.biologiezentrum.at Wulfenia 10 (2003): 15–50 Mitteilungen des Kärntner Botanikzentrums Klagenfurt Taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships between Old World and New World members of the tribe Loteae (Leguminosae): new insights from molecular and morphological data, with special emphasis on Ornithopus Galina V. Degtjareva, Carmen M. Valiejo-Roman, Tatiana E. Kramina, Evgeny M. Mironov, Tahir H. Samigullin & Dmitry D. Sokoloff Summary: The tribe Loteae s.l. (incl. Coronilleae) comprises about 275 species distributed in Eurasia, Africa, Australia, North and South America. 47 species of Loteae are endemic to the New World, while all others are restricted to the Old World. Main centres of diversity are Mediterranean region and California. The genus Ornithopus has an unusual disjunctive distribution, with one species (O. micranthus) in subtropical regions of Eastern South America and five species in Europe, Mediterranean region, Macaronesia and the Caucasus. We have produced sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS1-2 region of six Loteae species, and have studied fruit anatomy, pollen morphology and other morphological characters in several members of the tribe, with special emphasis on Ornithopus. Our data confirm that the genus Ornithopus, in its traditional circum- scription, represents a natural, monophyletic group. The ITS data strongly suggest sister group relationships between O. micranthus and Old World species of Ornithopus. We have confirmed results by ALLAN & PORTER (2000) and ALLAN et al. (2003) that Ornithopus tend to group with North American genus Hosackia on trees inferred from analyses of ITS sequences. There is little morphological support for such a grouping.
    [Show full text]