Influences Affecting Compressive Strength of Modern Non-Hydraulic Lime Mortars Used in Masonry Conservation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Transactions on the Built Environment vol 55, © 2001 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 Influences affecting compressive strength of modern non-hydraulic lime mortars used in masonry conservation J. Valek & P.J.M. Bartos Advanced Concrete and Masonry Centre, University of Paisley, Scotland Abstract Non-hydraulic lime based mortars are currently more and more often used for the repair of historic masonry. They are presumed to be compatible with the original mortarlmasonry and their properties are not always evaluated, mainly due to a lack of research into mortars produced in a traditional manner. Influences of curing conditions, quality of mixing and water content on compressive strength of a non-hydraulic lime mortar mix made of lime putty were reviewed and examined. The mortar specimens were prepared with various water contents, cured in outdoor and indoor conditions and tested after 1, 2, 4 and 6 months. Phenolphthalein pH indictor was used to measure the carbonation depth. The strongest mortar specimens were from the indoor ageing condition although the mortar was less carbonated. The addition of water into the fresh mix increased porosity and lowered the compressive strength, however there were other influences which affected this relationship. 1 Introduction In conservation practice there are two main ways to design a new repair mortar. The first one is based on the traditional conservation approach when the new mortar is a copy reproducing the original mortars as close as possible. The second one is more scientifically based, involving a detailed testing of properties of new and original mortars in order to ensure their compatibility. This approach is a more universal and advanced way of designing a compatible mortar Transactions on the Built Environment vol 55, © 2001 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 572 Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance ofHistorica1 Buildings as the first one is based merely on the presumption that the copied mortar will perform in the same manner as the original one. Although this presumption may not always be correct, as the historic mortars often undergo certain changes during their ageing [l], in the case of non-hydraulic lime mortars such application is probably close enough in terms of compatibility needs. However, the lack of research into the properties of lime-based mortars produced in the traditional ways inhibits accurate compatible design. The biggest hmdrance to this research is the complexity of influences on the mortar performance. To assess the performance of non-hydraulic lime mortars or their compatibility a number of tests are usually carried out [2]. Compressive strength testing remains a key factor in this assessment, however it should not be used as a sole measure of quality. In fact, for determination of compatibility of non-hydraulic lime mortars the value of the compressive strength alone may not be needed at all. However, in research of the mechanical and physical properties of lime mortars, compressive strength testing is a standard way to assess their hardening, setting and strength, and is related to carbonation, porosity and other physical properties [3]. Figure 1: Stone and lime mortar interaction and influencing factors after Bartos and Lawson [6]. 2 Influences on lime mortars performance Non-hydraulic lime based mortars are expected to have a relatively low compressive strength, approximately 0.5-3MPa and are expected to adjust to seasonal and minor structural movement without damage (4, S]. Durability of lime based mortars can vary depending on conditions and ageing but surviving examples of historic mortars well over 600 years old are available world-wide. Durability and performance of non-hydraulic lime mortars are limited not only by the material itself but also by workmanship, ageing and curing condtions and stone and mortar interaction, as presented in figure 1 [6]. Especially in the case of historic masonry, proper workmanship was determinative for the quality of work and therefore the performance of lime tnortars. Swiving masonry of historic structures is prove the quality of such practical and empirical knowledge of the past, however exact assessment is tnore difficult as the masonry and mortar have undergone durability testing over the centuries. Transactions on the Built Environment vol 55, © 2001 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Historical Buildings 5 7 3 2.1 Influence of workmanship and masonry construction The performance of modem non-hydraulic lime mortars made of lime putty is considered to be strongly dependent on workmanship 111. The workmanship comprises not only the application of mortar but also particular constructional details, adequate workability, final surface finish, in-situ protection and curing. The workmanship should reflect the actual state of masonry and environmental conditions. Moisture suction parameters of masonry units together with often dBerent ageing conditions affect the bond between mortar and masonry. Properties of mortars cured in steel moulds are therefore dBerent from those of mortar cast between masonry 171. 2.2 Influence of water content It has been suggested by Schafer et al. [S] that a correlation between porosity of an ancient and new lime mortar could be used as a method to estimate the compressive strength. The amount of water added determines porosity of a hardened mortar. Together with a degree of compaction they characterise a volume of voids in the mortar. A higher porosity means a lower strength. The mechanical properties of lime mortars are improved if the amount of water is reduced [9]. Lime putty usually contains enough water for mortar (bedding andtor pointing mortar) to be prepared without a firther addition of water 141. 2.3 Influence of workability Type of aggregate, its grading and lime puttylaggregate proportions control the amount of water needed to provide a good workability. The optimal waterhinder proportions differs depending on construction and application techniques. Good compaction of lime mortar is vital for its performance. Good workable Lime mortar possesses a greater degree of plasticity; it is often described as near to a modelling clay. 2.4 Influence of curing and ageing The curinglageing conditions for non-hydraulic lime mortars are to promote a combination of drying out (initial setting) and carbonation at such a rate that minimises shrinkage. The ideal environment has a temperature around 20°C and relative humid@ between 50-70% [10]. The strength development of the lime based mortars due to carbonation is inherently a very long-term process, depending on the curinglageing conditions. Curing described by British Standard [l11 for mortar specimens is not appropriate for non-hydraulic lime mortars. Moist curing in a container can possibly be used, however the container should not be airtight. According to literature [l21 and considering the nature of the hardening process of lime mortar such humid conditions can retard the carbonation and do not represent ambient conditions encountered in practice. Transactions on the Built Environment vol 55, © 2001 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 574 Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Historical Buildings 2.5 Influence of mixing and lime putty maturing The mixing and production methods of non-hydraulic lime mortars can also have a very strong influence on their performance. Maturing of some lime putties reduces their particle size and improves their water retentivity [13]. Sand [4]. carrying capacity should improve with reduction of particle size Hand or mechanical mixing can produced mortars of different quality. From practice it is known that the mortar plasticity can be improved by way of mixing. Traditional techruques of mixing 'by hand' involved beating, chopping and ramming on a wooden board until the mix was sticky and workable [4]. Ready-mixed mortar should be re-mixed before use. 3 Experimental The above review of influences on performance of lime mortars presented some factors that were considered before the experimental part was carried out. The objective of this research limited itself to examine only the influence of curing conditions on strength development with ageing and the effect of water addition during mixing. In order to eliminate the other influences and simpllfy the testing, one type of mortar, the same mixing method and 5Ox50x50mm cube specimens were used. The specimens were cured in laboratory conditions and not in realistic conditions withm masonry. Cube specimens were more practical and the experiment was seen as a first step in order to examine the basic principles. 3.1 Material and curing conditions A non-hydraulic ready-mixed lime mortar commonly used in conservation for repair works on stone masonry was used to cast sixty 50mm cubes. The lime mortar was a 1:3 mix, consisting of a minimum six-~nonth-oldnon-hydraulic Shapfell lime putty and Gowrie concrete sand. Density of the fresh mortar was determined as 2080 kg/m3. The specimens were cured in three different conditions marked as a, b and c. The curing condition a was the most stable. The temperature was, on average, around 20°C. The relative humidity (RH) was between 50% to 60%. The curing condition b was an indoor condition. The room was not heated, and therefore a whole range of temperatures above zero from 1°C to 23°C was monitored. On average, the temperatures were around 13°C to 16°C and RH from 58% to 65%. The condition c was a natural weather condition, where the specimens were exposed to temperatures below zero during winter. The exposure site was relatively sheltered and the temperatures and relative humidity were similar to typical average weather conditions in the west of Scotland. The lowest temperature was in winter (-S°C), and the hottest was during summer (+26"C). Transactions on the Built Environment vol 55, © 2001 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3509 Structural Studies, Repam and Matntenance of Historical Buildi~gs 575 Relative humidity varied from 9% to 94% but on average the RH was quite high over all seasons between 75 - 85%.