EMERGENCY MEDICINE PRACTICE EMPRACTICE.NET an EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH to EMERGENCY MEDICINE May 2003 Acute Dental Emergencies Volume 5, Number 5

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

EMERGENCY MEDICINE PRACTICE EMPRACTICE.NET an EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH to EMERGENCY MEDICINE May 2003 Acute Dental Emergencies Volume 5, Number 5 EMERGENCY MEDICINE PRACTICE EMPRACTICE.NET AN EVIDENCE-BASED APPROACH TO EMERGENCY MEDICINE May 2003 Acute Dental Emergencies Volume 5, Number 5 In Emergency Medicine Author “What do you mean, you don’t have a dentist in the emergency department?” Kip Benko, MD, FACEP Clinical Instructor in Emergency Medicine, “Go ahead, Doc—just pull it.” University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine; Attending Physician, Mercy Hospital of Pittsburgh, “I called my dentist’s office but got no answer. He pulled my tooth this morning Pittsburgh, PA. and now it’s bleeding like crazy. Oh, yeah—I’m on Coumadin!” Peer Reviewers OUND familiar? Complaints pertaining to teeth are common, and Marianne C. Burke, MD Spatients frequently present to the ED for initial care. Many patients Emergency Medicine Consultants, Los Angeles, CA. realize that definitive care must be provided by a dentist or oral surgeon, but either pain, trauma, inability to contact their dentist, or the lack of Charles Stewart, MD, FACEP Colorado Springs, CO. financial resources leads patients to our EDs.1 While treating dental emergencies in the ED can be challenging and frustrating, it can also be CME Objectives immensely satisfying. There is no more appreciative patient than one relieved of severe dental pain. Many emergency physicians are unable to Upon completing this article, you should be able to: recognize and treat acute dental problems because of a lack of specific 1. describe the structure, classification, training, yet proper initial care will limit morbidity such as tooth loss, pain, and identification of primary and infection, and, potentially, craniofacial abnormality. Moreoever, while permanent teeth; “dental patients” are often triaged as non-emergent, some of these patients 2. discuss appropriate historical questions deserve ICU-level care from the moment that they come into the ED. and physical examination techniques for both traumatic and non-traumatic dental emergencies; Critical Appraisal Of The Literature 3. describe appropriate anesthesia for patients with dental emergencies, including dental The literature regarding the treatment of dental emergencies in the ED is block techniques most frequently required in mostly extrapolated from other specialties. There are no ED-based outcome the ED; studies or randomized, controlled studies addressing specific treatment 4. describe the ED treatment of traumatic and modalities for fractured teeth, avulsed teeth, infected teeth, odontalgia and non-traumatic dental emergencies; and 5. describe appropriate disposition of patients nerve block anesthesia, or alveolar osteitis (dry sockets). Interestingly, with different types of dental emergencies, prospective outcome data with regard to traumatized teeth are also scarce including indications for referral. in the dental literature. There are no universally accepted guidelines regarding the ED treatment of acutely injured or infected teeth. Several Date of original release: May 1, 2003. studies are currently under way that address the treatment of dental pain Date of most recent review: April 9, 2003. with dental blocks in the ED, but none have yet been published. See “Physician CME Information” on back page. Editor-in-Chief New Mexico Health Sciences Vice-Chairman, Department of Francis P. Kohrs, MD, MSPH, Associate Medical Service, Orlando, FL. Center School of Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Morristown Professor and Chief of the Division Alfred Sacchetti, MD, FACEP, Stephen A. Colucciello, MD, FACEP, Albuquerque, NM. Memorial Hospital. of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Research Director, Our Lady of Assistant Chair, Department of W. Richard Bukata, MD, Clinical School of Medicine, New York, NY. Lourdes Medical Center, Camden, Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Michael A. Gibbs, MD, FACEP, Chief, Professor, Emergency Medicine, NJ; Assistant Clinical Professor Medical Center, Charlotte, NC; Department of Emergency John A. Marx, MD, Chair and Chief, Los Angeles County/USC Medical of Emergency Medicine, Associate Clinical Professor, Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Department of Emergency Center, Los Angeles, CA; Medical Thomas Jefferson University, Department of Emergency Portland, ME. Medicine, Carolinas Medical Director, Emergency Department, Philadelphia, PA. Medicine, University of North Center, Charlotte, NC; Clinical San Gabriel Valley Medical Gregory L. Henry, MD, FACEP, Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Professor, Department of Corey M. Slovis, MD, FACP, FACEP, Center, San Gabriel, CA. CEO, Medical Practice Risk Emergency Medicine, University Hill, NC. Assessment, Inc., Ann Arbor, Professor of Emergency Medicine Francis M. Fesmire, MD, FACEP, of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Chairman, Department of MI; Clinical Professor, Department Chapel Hill, NC. Associate Editor Director, Heart-Stroke Center, of Emergency Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt Erlanger Medical Center; University of Michigan Medical Michael S. Radeos, MD, MPH, University Medical Center; Andy Jagoda, MD, FACEP, Vice- Assistant Professor of Medicine, Medical Director, Metro Nashville Chair of Academic Affairs, School, Ann Arbor, MI; President, Attending Physician, Department UT College of Medicine, American Physicians Assurance of Emergency Medicine, Lincoln EMS, Nashville, TN. Department of Emergency Chattanooga, TN. Medicine; Residency Program Society, Ltd., Bridgetown, Medical and Mental Health Center, Mark Smith, MD, Chairman, Director; Director, International Valerio Gai, MD, Professor and Chair, Barbados, West Indies; Past Bronx, NY; Assistant Professor in Department of Emergency Studies Program, Mount Sinai Department of Emergency President, ACEP. Emergency Medicine, Weill College Medicine, Washington Hospital School of Medicine, New York, NY. Medicine, University of Turin, Italy. of Medicine, Cornell University, Center, Washington, DC. Jerome R. Hoffman, MA, MD, FACEP, New York, NY. Michael J. Gerardi, MD, FACEP, Professor of Medicine/Emergency Charles Stewart, MD, FACEP, Editorial Board Clinical Assistant Professor, Medicine, UCLA School of Steven G. Rothrock, MD, FACEP, FAAP, Colorado Springs, CO. Medicine, University of Medicine Medicine; Attending Physician, Associate Professor Thomas E. Terndrup, MD, Professor Judith C. Brillman, MD, Residency and Dentistry of New Jersey; UCLA Emergency Medicine Center; of Emergency Medicine, University and Chair, Department of Director, Associate Professor, Director, Pediatric Emergency Co-Director, The Doctoring of Florida; Orlando Regional Emergency Medicine, University Department of Emergency Medicine, Children’s Medical Program, UCLA School of Medicine, Medical Center; Medical Director of of Alabama at Birmingham, Medicine, The University of Center, Atlantic Health System; Los Angeles, CA. Orange County Emergency Birmingham, AL. Although adequate treatment guidelines can be consultants. Simply saying “There’s a broken middle derived from other specialty literature, it must be upper tooth that’s bleeding” is not very informative to remembered that because dentists and maxillofacial/oral your dental colleague. surgeons often provide definitive care, their recom- The adult dentition consists of 32 teeth, of which mended modalities are not necessarily appropriate for there are four types: eight incisors, four canines, eight the ED. Several textbooks make treatment recommenda- premolars, and 12 molars. From the midline to the back tions based on dental literature that are impractical or not of the mouth there is a central incisor, lateral incisor, appropriate for emergency physicians unskilled in those canine, two premolars (bicuspids), and the three molars, techniques. There are several reviews in the emergency the last of which is the troublesome wisdom tooth. (See medicine literature that present guidelines for emergency Figure 1.) The adult teeth are numbered from 1 to 32, with physicians, but these are not based on ED studies.2-4 The the #1 tooth being the right upper third molar and the application of principles based on the dental literature to #16 tooth being the left upper third molar. The left lower an ED population requires a working knowledge of basic third molar is #17, and the #32 tooth is the right lower dental anatomy and physiology as well as an under- third molar. (See Figure 2.) It is more important that the standing of the medications, medicaments, anesthetics, emergency physician be able to describe the tooth glues, pastes, and bonding/splinting materials used in involved rather than remembering which number the dental professional’s office. belongs to which tooth. Therefore, simply describe the location and type of the problem tooth (for example, “the Epidemiology, Etiology, And Pathophysiology upper left second premolar” or “the lower right canine”). The primary dentition (“baby teeth”), likewise, is The incidence of dental complaints presenting to the ED best described by determining which tooth is involved. appears to be rising, ranging from 0.4% to 10.5%, which The earliest teeth to erupt in a child are the central may reflect the increasing use of EDs as primary care incisors, usually at 4-8 months. The child usually has a 1,5 facilities. Injuries in the younger population are often full complement of primary teeth by the end of the third related to falls or accidents, whereas those in the older year of life. The primary dentition is designated as age group are often secondary to falls, assaults, or motor vehicle accidents.1,3 Dental trauma presenting to EDs usually involves the permanent dentition and most Figure 2. Identification
Recommended publications
  • Management of Saliva and Drooling Excessive Saliva and Drooling Affects up to 50% of People with Parkinson’S (PD)
    Management of Saliva and Drooling Excessive saliva and drooling affects up to 50% of people with Parkinson’s (PD). Drooling can be embarrassing and can limit social interactions for the person with PD. Saliva and Drooling Parkinson Information Parkinson It can also be an important symptom of swallowing difficulty, which can increase the risk of choking on saliva. People with Parkinson’s disease do not swallow automatically due to rigidity and impaired mobility of the muscles of the palate, throat and esophagus. Saliva pools in the mouth and can potentially become a hazard since swallowing into the lungs carries the risk of pneumonia. If you have poor posture, saliva collects in the front of the mouth, resulting in drooling. Cause and symptoms Decreased control of saliva is most often caused by changes in the ability to swallow, rather than from producing too much saliva. A common cause of drooling for people with PD is the weakening and/or loss of motor control of the muscles involved in swallowing. You may experience one or more of the following symptoms: • Decreased ability to keep your mouth closed at rest, known as the “open mouth posture” • Difficulty keeping lips closed • Lack of awareness of the saliva in your mouth • Wetness at the sides of your mouth • A wet sounding voice • Drooling with posture changes • Coughing and/or choking Evaluation and treatment Speak with your physician about all symptoms that may not be related to PD. If you are experiencing drooling or choking on your saliva, you may require a swallowing evaluation by a Speech Language Pathologist.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary for Narrative Writing
    Periodontal Assessment and Treatment Planning Gingival description Color: o pink o erythematous o cyanotic o racial pigmentation o metallic pigmentation o uniformity Contour: o recession o clefts o enlarged papillae o cratered papillae o blunted papillae o highly rolled o bulbous o knife-edged o scalloped o stippled Consistency: o firm o edematous o hyperplastic o fibrotic Band of gingiva: o amount o quality o location o treatability Bleeding tendency: o sulcus base, lining o gingival margins Suppuration Sinus tract formation Pocket depths Pseudopockets Frena Pain Other pathology Dental Description Defective restorations: o overhangs o open contacts o poor contours Fractured cusps 1 ww.links2success.biz [email protected] 914-303-6464 Caries Deposits: o Type . plaque . calculus . stain . matera alba o Location . supragingival . subgingival o Severity . mild . moderate . severe Wear facets Percussion sensitivity Tooth vitality Attrition, erosion, abrasion Occlusal plane level Occlusion findings Furcations Mobility Fremitus Radiographic findings Film dates Crown:root ratio Amount of bone loss o horizontal; vertical o localized; generalized Root length and shape Overhangs Bulbous crowns Fenestrations Dehiscences Tooth resorption Retained root tips Impacted teeth Root proximities Tilted teeth Radiolucencies/opacities Etiologic factors Local: o plaque o calculus o overhangs 2 ww.links2success.biz [email protected] 914-303-6464 o orthodontic apparatus o open margins o open contacts o improper
    [Show full text]
  • Dry Socket (Alveolar Osteitis): Incidence, Pathogenesis, Prevention and Management
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273250883 Dry Socket (Alveolar Osteitis): Incidence, Pathogenesis, Prevention and Management Article · January 2013 CITATIONS READS 4 6,266 4 authors, including: Deepak Viswanath Mahesh kumar R krishnadevaraya college of dental sciences krishnadevaraya college of dental sciences 46 PUBLICATIONS 131 CITATIONS 14 PUBLICATIONS 29 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: AID reviews View project Systematic Reviews View project All content following this page was uploaded by Mahesh kumar R on 08 March 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. GirishREVIEW G Gowda ARTICLE et al Dry Socket (Alveolar Osteitis): Incidence, Pathogenesis, Prevention and Management Girish G Gowda, Deepak Viswanath, Mahesh Kumar, DN Umashankar ABSTRACT registered.12-15 The duration varies from 5 to 10 days Alveolar osteitis (AO) is the most common postoperative depending on the severity of the condition. complication after tooth extraction. The pathophysiology, etiology, prevention and treatment of the alveolar osteitis are ETIOLOGY very essential in oral surgery. The aim of this article is to provide a better basis for clinical management of the condition. In The exact etiology of AO is not well understood. Birn addition, the need for identification and elimination of the risk suggested that the etiology of AO is an increased local factors as well as preventive and symptomatic management of fibrinolysis leading to disintegration of the clot. However, the condition are discussed. several local and systemic factors are known to be Keywords: Alveolar osteitis, Localised osteitis, Septic socket, contributing to the etiology of AO.
    [Show full text]
  • Zeroing in on the Cause of Your Patient's Facial Pain
    Feras Ghazal, DDS; Mohammed Ahmad, Zeroing in on the cause MD; Hussein Elrawy, DDS; Tamer Said, MD Department of Oral Health of your patient's facial pain (Drs. Ghazal and Elrawy) and Department of Family Medicine/Geriatrics (Drs. Ahmad and Said), The overlapping characteristics of facial pain can make it MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio difficult to pinpoint the cause. This article, with a handy at-a-glance table, can help. [email protected] The authors reported no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article. acial pain is a common complaint: Up to 22% of adults PracticE in the United States experience orofacial pain during recommendationS F any 6-month period.1 Yet this type of pain can be dif- › Advise patients who have a ficult to diagnose due to the many structures of the face and temporomandibular mouth, pain referral patterns, and insufficient diagnostic tools. disorder that in addition to Specifically, extraoral facial pain can be the result of tem- taking their medication as poromandibular disorders, neuropathic disorders, vascular prescribed, they should limit disorders, or atypical causes, whereas facial pain stemming activities that require moving their jaw, modify their diet, from inside the mouth can have a dental or nondental cause and minimize stress; they (FIGURE). Overlapping characteristics can make it difficult to may require physical therapy distinguish these disorders. To help you to better diagnose and and therapeutic exercises. C manage facial pain, we describe the most common causes and underlying pathological processes. › Consider prescribing a tricyclic antidepressant for patients with persistent idiopathic facial pain. C Extraoral facial pain Extraoral pain refers to the pain that occurs on the face out- 2-15 Strength of recommendation (SoR) side of the oral cavity.
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Questions and Answers
    16. Questions and Answers 1. Which of the following is not associated with esophageal webs? A. Plummer-Vinson syndrome B. Epidermolysis bullosa C. Lupus D. Psoriasis E. Stevens-Johnson syndrome 2. An 11 year old boy complains that occasionally a bite of hotdog “gives mild pressing pain in his chest” and that “it takes a while before he can take another bite.” If it happens again, he discards the hotdog but sometimes he can finish it. The most helpful diagnostic information would come from A. Family history of Schatzki rings B. Eosinophil counts C. UGI D. Time-phased MRI E. Technetium 99 salivagram 3. 12 year old boy previously healthy with one-month history of difficulty swallowing both solid and liquids. He sometimes complains food is getting stuck in his retrosternal area after swallowing. His weight decreased approximately 5% from last year. He denies vomiting, choking, gagging, drooling, pain during swallowing or retrosternal pain. His physical examination is normal. What would be the appropriate next investigation to perform in this patient? A. Upper Endoscopy B. Upper GI contrast study C. Esophageal manometry D. Modified Barium Swallow (MBS) E. Direct laryngoscopy 4. A 12 year old male presents to the ER after a recent episode of emesis. The parents are concerned because undigested food 3 days old was in his vomit. He admits to a sensation of food and liquids “sticking” in his chest for the past 4 months, as he points to the upper middle chest. Parents relate a 10 lb (4.5 Kg) weight loss over the past 3 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandibular Fractures, Diagnostics, Postoperative Complications
    Journal of Medical Sciences. March 23, 2020 - Volume 8 | Issue 13. Electronic-ISSN: 2345-0592 Medical Sciences 2020 Vol. 8 (13), p. 45-52 e-ISSN: 2345-0592 Medical Sciences Online issue Indexed in Index Copernicus Official website: www.medicsciences.com Mandibular fractures, diagnostics, postoperative complications Shahaf Givony1 1 Lithuanian University of Health Sciences. Academy of Medicine. Faculty of Odonthology. ABSTRACT Mandibular fractures usually happen among young males at the age of 16-30 years old. The mandible which has been rated as the second facial bone with the highest rate of injuries, tends to break much more often compared to any other bone of the cranium and represent up to 70% of the cases. This tendency to fracture may be explained by the protruded position, mobility and particular shape of it. The tendency for a mandibular fracture may also be explained by the common risk factors such as vehicle accidents and physical violence that are part of our daily life. There are many other risk factors according to the literature which differ between individuals due to the different socio-economic status, culture, technology and environment. Before the clinical examination of the fracture, it is obligatory to make sure that a clear airway path presents with no other fatal injuries. The examination may be supported by imaging methods which together will approve the diagnosis and method of treatment. Patients with a fracture of the mandible may suffer from post-operative complications which may occur after a short or long duration of the treatment. Those complications may be malocclusion, infections, trismus, damaged teeth and soft tissue, esthetic disfiguration, functional problems, pain and many more.
    [Show full text]
  • Ankylosed Primary Molars, Andlaw (1974) Described Surface Defects from Bicuspids Preceded by Non-Ankylosed 11 Molars
    PEDIATRICDENTISTRY/Copyright (~) 1980 The AmericanAcademy of Pedodontics/Vol. 2, No, 1 Ankylosedprimary mola.rs: Results and treatment recommendat,onsfrom an eight-year longitudinal study Louise Brearley Messer,B.D.Sc., L.D.S., M.D.Sc. Jay T. Cline, D.D.S., M.A. Abstract continues concomitantly with vertical alveolar bone growth,~,3 and the tooth is immobile to manual rock- A total of 263 ankyloscd primarymolars in 107 ing.4,5 children aged three to 12 years was studied for four years. Forty-six children remainedin the study for eight years. The etiology of the condition remains unknown. Extrinsic causative factors implicated are local me- Observationof affected dentitions showedthat the con- ~ ~ dition waslikely to recur. Threeclinical pa~ternsfor the chanical trauma, disturbed local metabolism, local- condition are described. Typically, maxillary molars be- ized infection, 6 chemical or thermal irritation 7 and came ankylosed earlier and demonstrated more severe tooth reimplantation, s Intrinsic factors cited include a in[raocclusion than mandibularmolars. Mandibularfirst genetic or congenital gap in the periodontal liga- molars usually remainedslightly or moderatelyin#a- ment. Since both erupting and exfoliating teeth show occluded; mandibularsecond molars and maxillary first alternating periods of resorption and deposition of and second molars showedprogressively severe infra- bone and cementum,° aberrant deposition of these tis- occlusion. Followingeither extraction or ex~oliation of the suesI° may produce an area of ankylosing tissue.Z, affected molars, the succedaneousbicuspids did not differ In a summaryof studies reporting the prevalence of in either coronal morphologyor in distribution of enamel ankylosed primary molars, Andlaw (1974) described surface defects from bicuspids preceded by non-ankylosed 11 molars.
    [Show full text]
  • Osteoid-Osteoma
    Benign tumors of soft tissues and bones of head at children. Classification, etiology. Diagnostics, differential diagnostics, treatment and rehabilitation of children. Pediatric Surgical Dentistry Lector - Kolisnik I.A. 0504044002 (Viber, Telegram) Plan of lecture and their organizational structure. № The main stages of the Type of lecture. Means of time distribution lecture and activating students. Methodical their content support materials 1. Preparatory stage. look p 1 and 2 5 % definitionrelevance of the topic, learning objectives of the lecture and motivation 2. The main stage. Teaching lectureClinical lecture. 85 % material according to the plan: -90% 1. 1 Frequency of malignant processes of SHLD in children. 2. Phases of carcinogenesis 3. Signs of benign and malignant process. 4. Methods of diagnosis of SHLD tumors. 5. The structure of malignant pathology of the thyroid gland in children. 6. Clinical and morphological features of malignant tumors of the thyroid gland in children. Principles of treatment. 7. Basic principles of rehabilitation of children with oncological pathology. 8. Stages of formation of bone regenerate. 9. Clinical case. 1. The final stage Answers to possible 5 % 2. Lecture summary. questions. 3. General conclusions. Classification of benign neoplasm Type of tissue Type of neoplasm Pavement epithelium Squamous cell papilloma Secretory (glandular) epithelium Adenoma Connective Fibroma Adipose Lipoma Smooth muscle Leiomyoma Osseous Osteoma Cartilaginous Chondroma Lymphoid Lymphoma Transversal striated muscle Rhabdomioma
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Smiles Avulsion Pathway (Page 20) Saving Smiles: Fractures and Displacements (Page 22)
    Greater Manchester Local Dental Network SavingSmiles Improving outcomes following dental trauma First Edition I Spring 2017 Practitioners’ Toolkit Contents 04 Introduction to the toolkit from the GM Trauma Network 06 History & examination 10 Maxillo-facial considerations 12 Classification of dento-alveolar injuries 16 The paediatric patient 18 Splinting 20 The AVULSED Tooth 22 The BROKEN Tooth 23 Managing injuries with delayed presentation SavingSmiles 24 Follow up Improving outcomes 26 Long term consequences following dental trauma 28 Armamentarium 29 When to refer 30 Non-accidental injury 31 What should I do if I suspect dental neglect or abuse? 34 www.dentaltrauma.co.uk 35 Additional reference material 36 Dental trauma history sheet 38 Avulsion pathways 39 Fractues and displacement pathway 40 Fractures and displacements in the primary dentition 41 Acknowledgements SavingSmiles Improving outcomes following dental trauma Ambition for Greater Manchester Introduction to the Toolkit from The GM Trauma Network wish to work with our colleagues to ensure that: the GM Trauma Network • All clinicians in GM have the confidence and knowledge to provide a timely and effective first line response to dental trauma. • All clinicians are aware of the need for close monitoring of patients following trauma, and when to refer. The Greater Manchester Local Dental Network (GM LDN) has established a ‘Trauma Network’ sub-group. The • All settings have the equipment described within the ‘armamentarium’ section of this booklet to support optimal treatment. Trauma Network was established to support a safer, faster, better first response to dental trauma and follow up care across GM. The group includes members representing general dental practitioners, commissioners, To support GM practitioners in achieving this ambition, we will be working with Health Education England to provide training days and specialists in restorative and paediatric dentistry, and dental public health.
    [Show full text]
  • Feline Alveolar Osteitis Treatment Planning: Implant Protocol with Osseodensification and Early Crown Placement Rocco E
    Feline Alveolar Osteitis Treatment Planning: Implant Protocol with Osseodensification and Early Crown Placement Rocco E. Mele DVM1, Gregori M. Kurtzman, DDS, MAGD, DICOI,DIDIA2 1 Eastpoint Pet Clinic, Tucson, A, USA 2 Silver Spring, MD, USA Abstract: Feline dental implants are becoming a predictable and viable treatment option for the replacement of lost canines due to maxillary Alveolar Osteitis (AO) a painful condition, commonly experienced by a growing number of cats. Surgical extraction and debridement remains the treatment of choice for this complex inflammatory process. However, future complications can be a common sequela of maxillary canine loss. This case will demonstrate the successful surgical extraction of a maxillary canine with implant placement following the osseodensification protocol and utilizing the sockets osteitis buttressing bone formation to promote a positive result with final crown restoration 13 weeks following implant placement. Introduction: Alveolar Osteitis (AO) is a chronic inflammatory process more often diagnosed in maxillary canine sockets of the feline patient. Clinical presentation may include oral pain, bleeding, periodontitis, tooth resorption (ORL), and alveolar buccal bone changes.1-5 Clinical Features: A presumptive diagnosis of (AO) is made on the awake patient, documenting clinical features such as; gingivitis with soft tissue swelling, gingival mucosal erythema, buccal bone expansion, and coronal extrusion. (Figure 1) Radiographic Features: Radiographic changes are identified under general anesthesia. These bony changes and pathology may include; deep palatal probing (Figure 2 red), alveolar bone expansion (Figure 2 green), buttressing condensing bone (Figure 2 blue) and a mottled osseous appearance mimicking rough, large trabeculae (Figure 2 yellow) Osseodensification (OD): OD is a novel biomechanical bone preparation technique for dental implant placement to improve bone quality by increasing its density utilizing Densah burs.
    [Show full text]
  • 29360-Oral Cavity Dr. Alexandra Borges.Pdf
    ORAL CAVITY: ANATOMY AND PATHOLOGIES Alexandra Borges, MD COI Disclosure Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa I have nothing to disclose Champalimaud Foundation Lisbon, Portugal ECHNNR 2021 ECHNNR 2021 MR ANATOMY LEARNING OBJECTIVES • Become familiar with OC anatomy and the importance of using adequate terminology when reporting OC studies NASOPHARYNX NASAL CAVITY • Learn how to tailor imaging studies • Understand the different patterns of malignant tumor spread according to the different tumor subsites OROPHARYNX ORAL CAVITY HYPOPHARYNX BOUNDARIES CONTENTS: ORAL TONGUE Superior: • hard palate • superior alveolar ridge Inferior: • floor of the mouth • inferior alveolar ridge ITM Laterally: • cheeks and buccal mucosaosa Anterior: • Lips Posterior: • oropharynx ORAL TONGUE: Extrinsic tongue muscles EM: Styloglossus tongue retraction and elevation Styloglossus Palatoglossus Hyoglossus SG Geniglossus HG GG CN XII CN X EM: Palatoglossus elevation of the tongue EM: Hyoglossus tongue depression and retraction EM: Genioglossus tongue protrusion ORAL TONGUE: Extrinsic muscles GG GH TONGUE INNERVATION ORAL CAVITY IX sensitive and Spatial subdivision taste CN X Motor • Mucosal area • Tongue root • Sublingual space CN XII Motor • Submandibular space Lingual nerve: Sensitive (branch of V3) • Buccomasseteric region Taste (chorda tympani) ORAL MUCOSAL SPACE ROOT OF THE TONGUE 1. Lips 2. Gengiva (sup. alveolar ridge) 3. Gengiva (inf. alveolar ridge) 4. Buccal 5. Palatal 6. Sublingual/FOM 7. Retromolar trigone GG 8. Tongue ROT BOT Vestibule GH Mucosa
    [Show full text]
  • Pattern of Skeletal Injuries in Child Physical Abuse
    1 Bahrain Medical Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 2, June 2011 Pattern of Skeletal Injuries in Physically Abused Children Fadheela Al-Mahroos, MD, MHPE* Eshraq A Al-Amer, MD, ABMS (Ped)** Nabar J Umesh, MD, DMRE*** Ali I Alekri, FRCSI, CABS (Ortho)**** Objective: The aim of this study is to identify the frequency and patterns of skeletal injuries among victims of child abuse in Bahrain. Design: Retrospective. Setting: Child Protection Unit at Salmaniya Medical Complex. Method: Child’s characteristics, type of skeletal injuries, location, pattern, radiological findings, and associated other injuries of 36 children were reviewed. Data management and analysis was done using SPSS for Windows, version 18. Result: Thirty-six children with skeletal injuries resulting from child physical abuse were seen from 1991 to 2009. Twenty-three (64%) were males and 13 (36%) were females; the mean age was 3.8 years. Twenty-three (64%) were ≤ 3 years old. Multiple fractures were documented in 19 (53%) children. Bone fracture types and frequency were as follow: 10 (28%) affecting the femur, 9 (25%) skull, 8 (22%) humerus, 6 (17%) rib, 4 (11%) radius, 4 (11%) ulna and 2 (6%) tibia. Other bones less frequently affected were mandible, nasal bone, vertebral, metatarsals, and calcaneus fractures. In addition, other injuries included slipped femoral epiphysis, large bilateral hematoma in vastus lateralis, and full thickness tendon Achilles tear. Hundred percent of rib, ulnar, radial and tibial fractures were in children under one year old. In addition, 7 (78%) of skull fractures, 5 (62%) of humerus fractures, and 5 (50) of femur fractures were under one year old.
    [Show full text]