265246775.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
2 River Cities’ Reader • Vol. 22 No. 882 • May 14 - 27, 2015 Business • Politics • Arts • Culture • Now You Know • RiverCitiesReader.com T:9.25” Introducing OnLook.™ 24/7 remote home management and security. Activate today and get $75. With OnLook from U.S. Cellular® you can connect your house and your Smartphone for instant home control wherever you go. Turn o the lights when you’re at the grocery store. Lock the doors from the lake. Keep an eye on any room with a 24/7 live-video feed. Home security is in your hands. T:9.75” Experience OnLook in-store and get a $75 U.S. Cellular Prepaid Card when you activate your customized system. Come in today and we’ll even pay o your current security system contract. Things we want you to know: 2-year agreement and Shared Connect Plan required. $40 device activation fee and credit approval required. Regulatory Cost Recovery Fee applies (currently $1.82/line/month); this is not a tax or gvmt. required charge. Add. fees, taxes and terms apply and vary by svc. and eqmt. The Customer Service Agreement Terms and Conditions and the Terms and Conditions of Agreement for OnLook™ digital system services apply for as long as you are a customer and control the provision of the service. See store or uscellular.com for details. Optional equipment may be required. $75 Prepaid Card in the form of a Visa closed loop Prepaid Card that will be issued in-store. Card is only valid at U.S. Cellular store locations and at uscellular.com. To qualify, customers must purchase one OnLook device package and register for My Account. Limit one $75 Prepaid Card per account. Prepaid Card offer expires May 20, 2015. Contract Payoff Promo: Submit final bill identifying Early Termination Fee (ETF) charged by carrier within 60 days of activation date to uscellular.com/contractpayoff or via mail to U.S. Cellular Contract Payoff Program 5591-61; PO Box 752257; El Paso, TX 88575-2257. Customer will be reimbursed for the ETF reflected on final bill up to $350/line. Reimbursement in form of a U.S. Cellular Prepaid Card issued by MetaBank,® Member FDIC; additional offers are not sponsored or endorsed by MetaBank. This card VENDOR does not have cash access and can be used at any merchant location that accepts MasterCard® Debit Cards within the U.S. only. Card valid through expiration date shown on front of card. Allow 12–14 weeks for processing. To be eligible, customer must register for My Account. Trademarks RELEASED TO and trade names are the property of their respective owners. Additional terms apply. See store or uscellular.com for details. ©2015 U.S. Cellular Vendor: Williams Vendor: Release Date: 4/10/15 Job # USC1-15-01828 190 REV Version # 1 Document Name USC1-15-01828_190_N082_9.25x9.75_OnLook_REV.indd Last Modified 4-10-2015 3:19 PM Linked Graphics Colors In-Use Job Description N082-OnLook Art Director knoble User Printer Output Date MU20495_new_onlook graphic_FINAL_RDM_4CNP.psd CMYK Cyan ma-mdanish 10C-EXP550 4-10-2015 3:19 PM Bleed None Mech Scale 100% Copy Writer TBD 548 ppi Magenta USCC logo_4CNP_horizontal_2012.eps Yellow Mechd By: mdanish RTVd By: mdanish Trim 9.25” x 9.75” Print Scale None Proj Mgr ndriscoll MU21041_USC_Onlook Box_Photo_RTr2_sf_4CNP_v2.psd Black CMYK 445 ppi USCC Blue newsprint Live 8.75” x 9.25” Stock newsprint Acct Svc tconner USCC Blue USCC Red newsprint Folded Size None Prod Mgr ehale CD/ACD COPYWRITER AD CONTENT Finishing None Art Buyer TBD Colors Spec’d 4CNP Copy Edit TBD ACCT SERVICE PROD COPY EDIT Special Instr. None Mac mdanish 4-10-2015 3:19 PM BY SIGNING YOUR INITIALS ABOVE, YOU ARE STATING THAT YOU HAVE READ AND APPRO Publications None VED THIS WORK. Business • Politics • Arts • Culture • Now You Know • RiverCitiesReader.com River Cities’ Reader • Vol. 22 No. 882 • May 14 - 27, 2015 3 GUEST COMMENTARY by Scott E. Stafne How Jury Trials Could Have Softened the Blow of the Financial Crisis or most of our history, lawyers have Constitution unless it was amended to that juries could reach a result that a judge have been found not to be inconsistent with thought of themselves as the unofficial include a Bill of Rights, which secured the could or might not decide. As Charles W. the Seventh Amendment.” It cited cases Ffourth “arm” of the government. This right to trial by jury in both criminal and Wolfram wrote, juries were there to provide deciding that a “directed verdict does not view is more understandable from lawyers’ civil cases. Patrick Henry, a lawyer and well- “protection for litigants in general, and for violate the Seventh Amendment,” that a past role as “trial advocates” than from the known patriot at that time, argued: “Trial debtors in particular ... .” “retrial limited to question of damages does present relationship between the bench and by jury is the best appendage of freedom. By the mid-20th Century, the right to not violate the Seventh Amendment even bar, which reduces the significance lawyers ... No appeal can now be made as to fact in a trial by jury was under continual attack though there was no practice at common law have in the administration of justice. common-law suits. The unanimous verdict by judges. In 1943, Justice Hugo Black, for setting aside a verdict in part,” and that Under the law in effect in most colonies of impartial men cannot be reversed.” This joined by Justices William O. Douglas and “summary judgment does not violate the at the time our Constitution was written, result was not because the jury would always Frank Murphy, complained in their dissent Seventh Amendment.” lawyers were advocates who had the right be right, but because the result came from in Galloway that the “gradual process of Early on in this century, the Supreme to argue the merits of their clients’ cases impartial members of the community. judicial erosion ... has slowly worn away a Court continued to wage war against the directly to a jury. Juries, not judges, had the Significantly, our constitutional history major portion of the essential guarantee of constitution’s guarantee to a jury trial in civil right to decide most cases as they saw fit shows jury trials were intended to be a the Seventh Amendment.” cases. In Bell Atlantic Corp. V. Twombly and both with regard to the facts and the law. As structural check on the power of the judicial A little more than three decades later, Ashcroft V. Iqbal, the Supreme Court held that the Supreme Court noted in 1943’s Galloway branch to resolve disputes involving citizens’ Justice William Rehnquist – dissenting in trials (jury or not) were not necessary where V. United States: “In 1789, juries occupied liberties and properties. In this regard, Parklane Hosiery Co. V. Shore – echoed these a federal judge did not find the allegations of the principal place in the administration Thomas Jefferson wrote: “I consider trial by same words, quoting Black. Rehnquist, who a plaintiff’s complaint “plausible.” The word of justice. They were frequently in both jury as the only anchor ever yet imagined by was not known for being a liberal justice, “plausible” is problematic to some because it criminal and civil cases the arbiters not only man, by which a government can be held to questioned whether the right to a jury trial implies a “judge-centric” subjective standard, of fact but of law.” the principles of its constitution.” had been gutted to the extent it no longer as opposed to the more objective one it The king’s denial of the right to a trial Over the years, judges appeared to forget provided a constitutional check on the replaced. by jury was one of the reasons justifying (or decided to ignore) the fact that trials power of the judicial branch of government. The Supreme Court’s grant of pretty separation from England in the Declaration decided by a jury – rather than the sovereign’s The majority in Parklane was not moved, much unfettered discretion to federal judges of Independence. judges – were a constitutional mechanism as it unabashedly observed that it frequently to dismiss cases based on each judge’s belief Many believed the right to a jury intended to keep the administration of law by engaged in rule-making that interfered with that a complaint is not “plausible” has been trial was not adequately guaranteed in the judicial department consistent with the access to jury trials: “[M]any procedural heavily criticized by some state supreme Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution. wishes and feelings of the community. The devices developed since 1791 that have courts and academic commentators. For Anti-federalists urged rejection of the framers of our Constitution contemplated diminished the civil jury’s historic domain Continued On Page 15 4 River Cities’ Reader • Vol. 22 No. 882 • May 14 - 27, 2015 Business • Politics • Arts • Culture • Now You Know • RiverCitiesReader.com T:9.25” Get the new Samsung Galaxy S® 6. And then some. Trade in for the Samsung Galaxy S® 6 or Galaxy S® 6 Edge and get $50 on top of your old device’s value. Plus, we’ll pay off your old contract up to $350 per line. A better value than Verizon and AT&T Lines U.S. Cellular® Verizon AT&T $ * $ * $ * 2 100 /8GB 115 /8GB 130 /10GB T:9.75” 4 $120*/8GB $145*/8GB $160*/10GB *Per month. Valid as of 3/24/15. $ DOWN Retail Installment Contract, Shared Connect Plan and $25 act. fee required. 0% APR; 20 mo.