The Weimar Republic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Weimar Republic Chapter 4 The Weimar The Scope and Sequence Republic: Individual Choosing to & Society Participate The Fragility of We & They Judgment, Memory & Legacy The Holocaust Democracy akg-images HaHB_chapter4_v1_PPS.indd 156 2/28/17 7:51 PM Overview The Weimar Republic, the post– World War I German government named for the German city where it was formed, lasted more than 14 years, but democracy never found firm footing. This chapter explores Germany in the years preceding the Nazis’ ascension to power by highlighting efforts to turn a fledgling republic into a strong democracy and examining the misunderstandings, myths, and fears that often undercut those efforts. HaHB_chapter4_v1_PPS.indd 157 2/28/17 7:51 PM Chapter 4 Introduction After World War I ended in 1918, Kaiser Wilhelm fled to the Netherlands, Essential and Germany became a republic. The Weimar Republic was characterized Questions by contrasts and conflicts. The Weimar government granted significant new rights and freedoms to individuals and groups, beginning an era in • How do fears, both real and which creativity and experimentation flourished. At the same time, the imagined, shape the way we as individuals and as republic struggled to convince many Germans, accustomed to monarchy, citizens define our nation’s to accept and trust its authority. The people’s trust in the republic was universe of obligation? especially damaged as it faced economic crises as well as challenges from political parties that were hostile to democracy. • How can we as citizens build and maintain a Two very different moods characterized Weimar politics and society. The democracy that protects the first mood was one of excitement and creativity. Newly permitted freedom nation as a whole without of expression in art, music, dance, and architecture burst forth in Weimar undermining individual culture and left a lasting legacy for our modern world. Women took on rights? new roles in Weimar society, as they constituted roughly a third of the • How could a society that German workforce after World War I, exercised their new right to vote, is politically and culturally and held political office for the first time. liberal and progressive fall The second mood was one of anxiety and fear. The pace of change, victim to a government especially in expanding political rights and social freedoms, made many that espouses intolerance, Germans uneasy and sparked backlash against the changes. Many also discrimination, and hatred? feared the impact of communism, which had taken over Russia and threat- ened to spread its abolition of private wealth and property to Germany, by violence if necessary. This fear was heightened by two economic crises that tested the leadership of the Weimar government: the hyperinflation Watch Facing History that beset the republic in its early years and the Great Depression in its final VIDEO Scholar Reflections: The Weimar Republic years. Parties from across the political spectrum clashed violently in the hstry.is/more streets throughout the Weimar era, leaving citizens on edge. Meanwhile, interest in and enthusiasm for the message of ultra-conservative forces, in particular the growing National Socialist Party with its message of racial Explore The hatred and its demand for a return to an autocratic government, continued Weimar Republic: to grow. The Fragility of LESSON Democracy In his autobiography, artist George Grosz recalls how these moods shaped hstry.is/more life in Germany during the 1920s: Even the capital of our new German Republic was like a bubbling cauldron. You could not see who was heating the cauldron; you could merely see it merrily bub- bling, and you could feel that heat increasing. There were speakers on every street corner and songs of hatred everywhere. Everybody was hated: the Jews, the cap- italists, the gentry, the communists, the military, the landlords, the workers, the unemployed . the politicians, the department stores, and again the Jews.1 1 George Grosz, An Autobiography, trans. Nora Hodges (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), 149–50. 158 HOLOCAUST AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR HaHB_chapter4_v1_PPS.indd 158 2/28/17 7:51 PM An investigation of the Weimar Republic not only provides a crucial foundation for understanding the Nazi era that followed it but can also serve as a warning and a guide for democracies today. Historian Paul Bookbinder explains: The history of the Weimar Republic illuminates one of the most creative and crucial periods in the twentieth century and serves as a significant case study of our own time. Many of the questions asked about the Weimar Republic are relevant to prob- lems that individuals and societies face in the twenty-first century.2 Historian Detlev Peukert has observed that the hallmark of the Weimar period was uncertainty.3 In many ways, the crises and dilemmas Germans faced in the 1920s were similar to those that people in other nations have faced and continue to face today in times of transition and change. 2 Paul Bookbinder, “Why Study Weimar Germany?,” The Weimar Republic: The Fragility of Democracy, Facing History and Ourselves, accessed March 30, 2016, https://www.facinghistory.org/weimar-republic-fragility-democracy/readings/why-study-weimar-germany. 3 Detlev Peukert, The Weimar Republic: The Crisis of Classical Modernity (New York: Hill and Wang, 1987), 275. CHAPTER 4: THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC: THE FRAGILITY OF DEMOCRACY 159 HaHB_chapter4_v1_PPS.indd 159 2/28/17 7:51 PM Reading 1 The November Revolution By fall 1918, the military leaders of Germany knew that they could not win World War I. In hopes of gaining more favorable terms when they sur- rendered to the Allies, German generals urged the liberal Prince Max von Baden to form a new German government that was more democratic than the monarchy under the kaiser. But Baden was unable to control the navy, whose leaders wanted to go down fighting rather than surrender. In Octo- ber 1918, when navy ships sailed to fight the British fleet, German sailors, refusing to begin a battle they were likely to lose, mutinied against their admirals. The news of the mutiny touched off uprisings in support of the sailors throughout Germany.1 Ernst Toller, a German poet and playwright, described the demonstrations: First Kiel, then Munich, then Hanover, Hamburg, the Rhineland, Berlin. On Novem- ber 9th, 1918, the Berlin workers left the factories and marched in their thousands from north, south, and east to the center of the city—old gray men and women who had stood for years at the munitions benches, men invalided out of the army, boys who had taken over their fathers’ work. The processions were joined by men on leave, war-widows, wounded soldiers, students and solid citizens. No leader had arranged this uprising. The procession marched on in silence; there was no singing, no rejoicing. It came to a standstill before the gates of the Maikäfer Barracks. The gates were barred; rifles and machine-guns threatened from every window and loop-hole. Would the soldiers shoot? But the men in field-gray were the brothers of these ragged, starving crowds. They flung down their weapons, the gates were opened and the people streamed into the barracks and joined forces with the Kaiser’s army. The ruling powers gave in without a struggle, the officers surrendered. .2 As a result of the unrest, Kaiser Wilhelm, Baden, and other German leaders in the monarchy abdicated, or gave up their power, and left the coun- try. On November 10, the Berliner Tageblatt, a conservative newspaper, summed up the events of the previous day: “Yesterday morning, everything was still there [the kaiser, the chancellor, the chief of police]; yesterday afternoon nothing of all that existed any longer.”3 The Social 1 Richard J. Evans, The Coming of the Third Reich (New York: Penguin, 2003), 61–62. 2 Ernst Toller, I Was a German: The Autobiography of Ernst Toller, trans. Edward Crankshaw (St. Paul, MN: Paragon House, 1990), 139–40. 3 Quoted in Peter Fritzsche, Germans into Nazis (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998), 89. 160 HOLOCAUST AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR HaHB_chapter4_v1_PPS.indd 160 2/28/17 7:51 PM Democrats, the political party that had the largest number of delegates in the Reichstag (the German parliament), were now in charge of the country. But the Social Democrats, under the leadership of Friedrich Ebert, struggled to keep order. Radical groups and other political parties also tried to seize power in the confusion that followed the end of the war and of the mon- archy. They took control of many city halls and state governments across the country. The war was over, the German empire had fallen, and now the question was whether Germany could create a new future and what kind of society it would become. Connection Questions 1. What kinds of challenges face a society in the immediate aftermath of a war? 2. What was “revolutionary” about the events of November 9–10, 1918? 3. What motivated the protesters? Why did members of the military refuse to stop the protests? CHAPTER 4: THE WEIMAR REPUBLIC: THE FRAGILITY OF DEMOCRACY 161 HaHB_chapter4_v1_PPS.indd 161 2/28/17 7:51 PM Reading 2 Rumors of Betrayal Writing in 1939, German journalist Sebastian Haffner remembered his feelings as an 11-year-old upon hearing that the war had ended: On the eleventh there was no army bulletin on the notice board at my local po- lice station when I appeared there at the usual time. Empty and black, the board yawned at me. Horror overcame me to think that the board, which had sustained my spirit and nourished my dreams every day for years, would remain empty and black forevermore. I walked on. There must be some news from the front some- where. If the war was over (and one had to reckon with that possibility) there must at least have been some sort of end worth reporting, something like the final whis- tle at a soccer match.
Recommended publications
  • [Qicx6.Ebook] Khrushchev Pdf Free
    QIcx6 (Online library) Khrushchev Online [QIcx6.ebook] Khrushchev Pdf Free Edward Crankshaw *Download PDF | ePub | DOC | audiobook | ebooks #3905982 in Books 2016-03-08 2016-03-08Formats: Audiobook, MP3 Audio, UnabridgedOriginal language:EnglishPDF # 1 6.75 x .50 x 5.25l, Running time: 11 HoursBinding: MP3 CD | File size: 79.Mb Edward Crankshaw : Khrushchev before purchasing it in order to gage whether or not it would be worth my time, and all praised Khrushchev: 1 of 1 people found the following review helpful. This is a very readable book due to the style ...By Charles W. RiendeauThis is a very readable book due to the style of the author. But, it is also one of least fact-based biographies I have ever read. Partly this is due to the time in which it was written ( c 1966) when acquiring information not "officially" released by the Soviet Union was very, very hard. It was, for its time, I suppose what was available. In this time, I would suggest biographies of Khrushchev that were written in the early 90s when access to the KGB files and public records will have allowed the author to gather a more comprehensive set of facts.0 of 0 people found the following review helpful. Good historical readBy ceharvYou really cannot understand the full scope of 20th century history without understanding Russia. This book is a very interesting read about someone who, at a minimum, lead a very interesting life in a very interesting time. The pace is quick and the history important and puts much of our (in the U.S.) history in perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • The President Courts Chancellor Armed Forces Government Ministers
    What impact did the War have on Germany? The Weimar Republic Social impact - • traditional values were changing as more and more women • 9th November 1918 the Kaiser abdicated (he gave up his worked during the war throne) • German workers were bitter and angry about restrictions • Frederich Ebert became the leader of the new placed on their earnings during the war whilst factory owners government- the Weimar Republic. He signed an made a lot of money armistice (truce) bringing the war to an end • There were huge gaps between the standards of living between • A powerful myth developed- called stab in the back. This the rich and poor. was the idea that Germany had been stabbed in the back by politicians who accepted the end of the war Political Impact • In January 1919 elections took place for the new • Germany had a revolution and became an unstable republic government • Stresses of war led to a revolution in October and November 1918 The constitution • Many ex –soldiers and ordinary people disliked the new government - they thought Germany had been betrayed by the The President Weimar politicians Article 48 Economic Impact • Germany was nearly broke by the end of the war Chancellor Armed forces Courts • Industrial production was two thirds what it had been in 1913 • National income was a third of what it was before the war • The government was left with 600,000 widows and 2 million children to support- it spent one third of all its money on pensions. Government Ministers The Weimar Republic faced lots of threats 1919-1921 Reichstag The Threat from the Left Who:- Spartacists (Communists) When:- January 1919 German people- all vote over the age of 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Germany Key Words
    Germany Key Words Anti–Semitism Hatred of the Jews. Article 48 Part of the Weimar Constitution, giving the President special powers to rule in a crisis. Used By Chancellors to rule when they had no majority in the Reichstag – and therefore an undemocratic precedent for Hitler. Aryan Someone who Belongs to the European type race. To the Nazis this meant especially non– Jewish and they looked for the ideal characteristics of fair hair, Blue eyes... Autobahn Motorway – showpieces of the Nazi joB creation schemes Bartering Buying goods with other goods rather than money. (As happened in the inflation crisis of 1923) Bavaria Large state in the South of Germany. Hitler & Nazis’ original Base. Capital – Munich Beerhall Putsch Failed attempt to seize power By Hitler in NovemBer 1923. Hitler jailed for five years – in fact released Dec 1924 Brown Shirts The name given to the S.A. Centre Party Party representing Roman Catholics – one of the Weimar coalition parties. Dissolves itself July 1933. Chancellor Like the Prime Minister – the man who is the chief figure in the government, Coalition A government made up of a number of parties working together, Because of the election system under Weimar, all its governments were coalitions. They are widely seen as weak governments. Conscription Compulsory military service – introduced by Hitler April1935 in his drive to build up Germany’s military strength (against the terms of the Versailles Treaty) Conservatives In those who want to ‘conserve’ or resist change. In Weimar Germany it means those whose support for the RepuBlic was either weak or non–existent as they wanted a return to Germany’s more ordered past.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MEANING of HITLER Cesses" Were Carried out in the Shadow of Future Renaissance Or Re-Damnation? Bloodshed
    Volume XXXV No. I January 1980 INFORMATION iSSUfD By THE ASSOOAim OF JEWBH RBIKECS IN tREAT BRITJUH Eva G. Reichman extent his own. Intent on recording first the posi­ tive accomplishments, if possible without their darker implications, he chooses to ignore in this context that all these "Achievements and Suc­ THE MEANING OF HITLER cesses" were carried out in the shadow of future Renaissance or Re-Damnation? bloodshed. He enthuses, e.g. about Hitler's "econo­ mic miracle" his "positive achievement" "out­ shining all others". "The term did not then exist," Another Hitler-Book in Germany? Yet another orator of an almost hypnotic potency, his uncanny he writes. "It was coined much later for the product of that ominous Nazi Renaissance in gift to play with the collective unconscious where- astonishingly rapid reconstruction feat of the Germany of which we have heard too much ever he gets hold of it, and his total lack of self- Erhard era after the Second World War, but it already? criticism which is a great help in achieving the applies even better to what was taking place under Don't let us be rash, dear readers: another unthinkable. Hitler during the mid thirties. There was then a Hitler book all right (Sebastian Haffner, The Not surprisingly, decisive importance is given to Meaning of Hitler, Weidenfeld & Nicholson, much deeper and stronger impression that a real Hitler's antisemitism which will have to be men­ miracle was being accomplished, and that the London 1979, £5.95, translated by Ewald Osers tioned in several contexts. Sceptical though Haffner from: .^nmerkungen zu Hitler, Munich 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Aktueller Begriff Vor 100 Jahren: Der Mord an Matthias Erzberger
    Wissenschaftliche Dienste Aktueller Begriff Vor 100 Jahren: Der Mord an Matthias Erzberger Am 26. August 1921 wurde der Zentrumspolitiker Matthias Erzberger bei Bad Griesbach im Schwarzwald bei einem Spaziergang mit einem befreundeten Reichstagsabgeordneten von zwei rechtsradikalen Freikorpsmitgliedern ermordet. Der tödliche Anschlag galt einem der exponier- testen Verfechter der noch jungen Weimarer Demokratie, der als Reichstagsabgeordneter schon vor 1914 entschieden für eine Parlamentarisierung des Kaiserreiches eingetreten war. Matthias Erzberger wurde am 20. September 1875 im schwäbischen Dorf Buttenhausen geboren. Aus einfachen Verhältnissen stammend schloss er 1894 eine Ausbildung zum Volksschullehrer als Jahrgangsbester ab. Schon während seiner zweijährigen Tätigkeit als Lehrerpraktikant wurde seine politische Begabung vom Mitbegründer der württembergischen Zentrumspartei Josef Eckard entdeckt, der ihn zum Eintritt in die Redaktion des katholischen „Deutschen Volksblat- tes“ veranlasste. Neben seiner publizistischen Tätigkeit leitete Erzberger in Stuttgart ein katholi- sches Arbeitersekretariat und gehörte zu den Verfechtern der 1899 gegründeten Christlichen Ge- werkschaften. 1903 wurde er mit 28 Jahren für die Zentrumspartei im Wahlkreis Biberach-Leut- kirch-Waldsee-Wangen als jüngster Abgeordneter in den Reichstag gewählt, wo er zur neuen Ge- neration von Berufspolitikern zählte. Da Reichstagsabgeordnete zu diesem Zeitpunkt noch keine Diäten erhielten, verdiente er seinen Lebensunterhalt als parteipolitisch gebundener Journalist.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 3 Weimar and Nazi Germany Revision Guide and Student Activity Book
    Paper 3 Weimar and Nazi Germany Revision Guide and Student Activity Book Section 1 – Weimar Republic 1919-1929 What was Germany like before and after the First World War? Before the war After the war The Germans were a proud people. The proud German army was defeated. Their Kaiser, a virtual dictator, was celebrated for his achievements. The Kaiser had abdicated (stood down). The army was probably the finest in the world German people were surviving on turnips and bread (mixed with sawdust). They had a strong economy with prospering businesses and a well-educated, well-fed A flu epidemic was sweeping the country, killing workforce. thousands of people already weakened by rations. Germany was a superpower, being ruled by a Germany declared a republic, a new government dictatorship. based around the idea of democracy. The first leader of this republic was Ebert. His job was to lead a temporary government to create a new CONSTITUTION (SET OF RULES ON HOW TO RUN A COUNTRY) Exam Practice - Give two things you can infer from Source A about how well Germany was being governed in November 1918. (4 marks) From the papers of Jan Smuts, a South African politician who visited Germany in 1918 “… mother-land of our civilisation (Germany) lies in ruins, exhausted by the most terrible struggle in history, with its peoples broke, starving, despairing, from sheer nervous exhaustion, mechanically struggling forward along the paths of anarchy (disorder with no strong authority) and war.” Inference 1: Details in the source that back this up: Inference 2: Details in the source that back this up: On the 11th November, Ebert and the new republic signed the armistice.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Arts in the Urban Environment in the German Democratic Republic: Formal, Theoretical and Functional Change, 1949–1980
    Visual arts in the urban environment in the German Democratic Republic: formal, theoretical and functional change, 1949–1980 Jessica Jenkins Submitted: January 2014 This text represents the submission for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (in partial fulfilment of its requirements) at the Royal College of Art Copyright Statement This text represents the submission for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the Royal College of Art. This copy has been supplied for the purpose of research for private study, on the understanding that it is copyright material, and that no quotation from this thesis may be published without proper acknowledgment. Author’s Declaration 1. During the period of registered study in which this thesis was prepared the author has not been registered for any other academic award or qualification. 2. The material included in this thesis has not been submitted wholly or in part for any academic award or qualification other than that for which it is now submitted. Acknowledgements I would like to thank the very many people and institutions who have supported me in this research. Firstly, thanks are due to my supervisors, Professor David Crowley and Professor Jeremy Aynsley at the Royal College of Art, for their expert guidance, moral support, and inspiration as incredibly knowledgeable and imaginative design historians. Without a generous AHRC doctoral award and an RCA bursary I would not have been been able to contemplate a project of this scope. Similarly, awards from the German History Society, the Design History Society, the German Historical Institute in Washington and the German Academic Exchange Service in London, as well as additional small bursaries from the AHRC have enabled me to extend my research both in time and geography.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Violence: the German Army and Politics, 1918-1923
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2015-09-11 Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 Bucholtz, Matthew N Bucholtz, M. N. (2015). Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/27638 http://hdl.handle.net/11023/2451 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Republic of Violence: The German Army and Politics, 1918-1923 By Matthew N. Bucholtz A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA SEPTEMBER, 2015 © Matthew Bucholtz 2015 Abstract November 1918 did not bring peace to Germany. Although the First World War was over, Germany began a new and violent chapter as an outbreak of civil war threatened to tear the country apart. The birth of the Weimar Republic, Germany’s first democratic government, did not begin smoothly as republican institutions failed to re-establish centralized political and military authority in the wake of the collapse of the imperial regime. Coupled with painful aftershocks from defeat in the Great War, the immediate postwar era had only one consistent force shaping and guiding political and cultural life: violence.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of German-Scandinavian Relations
    A History of German – Scandinavian Relations A History of German-Scandinavian Relations By Raimund Wolfert A History of German – Scandinavian Relations Raimund Wolfert 2 A History of German – Scandinavian Relations Table of contents 1. The Rise and Fall of the Hanseatic League.............................................................5 2. The Thirty Years’ War............................................................................................11 3. Prussia en route to becoming a Great Power........................................................15 4. After the Napoleonic Wars.....................................................................................18 5. The German Empire..............................................................................................23 6. The Interwar Period...............................................................................................29 7. The Aftermath of War............................................................................................33 First version 12/2006 2 A History of German – Scandinavian Relations This essay contemplates the history of German-Scandinavian relations from the Hanseatic period through to the present day, focussing upon the Berlin- Brandenburg region and the northeastern part of Germany that lies to the south of the Baltic Sea. A geographic area whose topography has been shaped by the great Scandinavian glacier of the Vistula ice age from 20000 BC to 13 000 BC will thus be reflected upon. According to the linguistic usage of the term
    [Show full text]
  • The Kapp Putsch and the Ruhr Insurrection
    Chapter 12 - The Kapp Putsch and the Ruhr insurrection The Coup d’État and the First Instances of “Workers Government” and “Anti- Fascism” The Kapp Putsch (May 13-17, 1920) was an attempt on the part of reactionary elements in the Army to take the first steps towards building a strong right-wing government. The German Army (Reichswehr) was reestablished by the constituent assembly: by June 1919 it had 100,000 men, the maximum allowed by the postwar treaties. Including the Freikorps, however, by the beginning of 1920 the Army had 400,000 men, which provoked the protests of the victorious powers. The Freikorps arose during the period of military demobilization and State disintegration, and their only purpose was to serve as an instrument of the counterrevolution in Germany and Russia. They were paid by the State. As the situation appeared to have stabilized, the government solved part of its problem in September 1919 by prohibiting the creation of local militias, while directly transforming numerous Freikorps units into Reichswehr detachments. But it could not integrate all of them, as it wanted to provide the army with a republican “varnish”. The majority of the troops who would participate in the Kapp Putsch were from Freikorps units which had returned from Russia after having participated in the foreign intervention. They feared they would be discharged due to the terms of the Versailles Treaty. A right-wing faction, encouraged by Kapp, a senior Prussian official, established contacts with their commanders in order to carry out a political operation. Discovering that 6,000 men under the command of Lüttwitz (one of Noske’s direct subordinates in January 1919) were going to occupy Berlin on March 13, the socialist government fled to Dresden and then to Stuttgart.
    [Show full text]
  • The Failed Post-War Experiment: How Contemporary Scholars Address the Impact of Allied Denazification on Post-World War Ii Germany
    John Carroll University Carroll Collected Masters Essays Master's Theses and Essays 2019 THE FAILED POST-WAR EXPERIMENT: HOW CONTEMPORARY SCHOLARS ADDRESS THE IMPACT OF ALLIED DENAZIFICATION ON POST-WORLD WAR II GERMANY Alicia Mayer Follow this and additional works at: https://collected.jcu.edu/mastersessays Part of the History Commons THE FAILED POST-WAR EXPERIMENT: HOW CONTEMPORARY SCHOLARS ADDRESS THE IMPACT OF ALLIED DENAZIFICATION ON POST-WORLD WAR II GERMANY An Essay Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies College of Arts & Sciences of John Carroll University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts By Alicia Mayer 2020 As the tide changed during World War II in the European theater from favoring an Axis victory to an Allied one, the British, American, and Soviet governments created a plan to purge Germany of its Nazi ideology. Furthermore, the Allies agreed to reconstruct Germany so a regime like the Nazis could never come to power again. The Allied Powers met at three major summits at Teheran (November 28-December 1,1943), Yalta (February 4-11, 1945), and Potsdam (July 17-August 2, 1945) to discuss the occupation period and reconstruction of all aspects of German society. The policy of denazification was agreed upon by the Big Three, but due to their political differences, denazification took different forms in each occupation zone. Within all four Allied zones, there was a balancing act between denazification and the urgency to help a war-stricken population in Germany. This literature review focuses specifically on how scholars conceptualize the policy of denazification and its legacy on German society.
    [Show full text]
  • The German Military and Hitler
    RESOURCES ON THE GERMAN MILITARY AND THE HOLOCAUST The German Military and Hitler Adolf Hitler addresses a rally of the Nazi paramilitary formation, the SA (Sturmabteilung), in 1933. By 1934, the SA had grown to nearly four million members, significantly outnumbering the 100,000 man professional army. US Holocaust Memorial Museum, courtesy of William O. McWorkman The military played an important role in Germany. It was closely identified with the essence of the nation and operated largely independent of civilian control or politics. With the 1919 Treaty of Versailles after World War I, the victorious powers attempted to undercut the basis for German militarism by imposing restrictions on the German armed forces, including limiting the army to 100,000 men, curtailing the navy, eliminating the air force, and abolishing the military training academies and the General Staff (the elite German military planning institution). On February 3, 1933, four days after being appointed chancellor, Adolf Hitler met with top military leaders to talk candidly about his plans to establish a dictatorship, rebuild the military, reclaim lost territories, and wage war. Although they shared many policy goals (including the cancellation of the Treaty of Versailles, the continued >> RESOURCES ON THE GERMAN MILITARY AND THE HOLOCAUST German Military Leadership and Hitler (continued) expansion of the German armed forces, and the destruction of the perceived communist threat both at home and abroad), many among the military leadership did not fully trust Hitler because of his radicalism and populism. In the following years, however, Hitler gradually established full authority over the military. For example, the 1934 purge of the Nazi Party paramilitary formation, the SA (Sturmabteilung), helped solidify the military’s position in the Third Reich and win the support of its leaders.
    [Show full text]