DOCSLIB.ORG

Designation of Critical Habitat for Ipomopsis Polyantha

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Designation of Critical Habitat for Ipomopsis Polyantha Vol. 77 Monday, No. 156 August 13, 2012 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Ipomopsis polyantha (Pagosa skyrocket), Penstemon debilis (Parachute beardtongue), and Phacelia submutica (DeBeque phacelia); Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:27 Aug 10, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\13AUR3.SGM 13AUR3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3 48368 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 156 / Monday, August 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR (TDD), call the Federal Information and are completed the final Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. environmental assessment concurrently Fish and Wildlife Service SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: with this final determination. Peer reviewers support our methods. 50 CFR Part 17 Executive Summary We obtained opinions from four Why we need to publish a rule and knowledgeable individuals with [Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2011–0040: the basis for our action. Under the Act, scientific expertise to review our 4500030114] any species that is determined to be technical assumptions, analysis, RIN 1018–AX75 threatened or endangered shall, to the adherence to regulations, and whether maximum extent prudent and or not we had used the best available Endangered and Threatened Wildlife determinable, have habitat designated information. These peer reviewers and Plants; Designation of Critical that is considered to be critical habitat. generally concurred with our methods Habitat for Ipomopsis polyantha We listed these three plant species on and conclusions and provided (Pagosa skyrocket), Penstemon debilis July 27, 2011 (76 FR 45054). At the same additional information, clarifications, (Parachute beardtongue), and Phacelia time, we proposed to designate critical and suggestions to improve this final submutica (DeBeque phacelia) habitat (76 FR 45078). Section 4(b)(2) of rule. the Act states that the Secretary shall Background AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, designate critical habitat on the basis of Interior. the best available scientific data after It is our intent to discuss in this final ACTION: Final rule. taking into consideration the economic rule only those topics directly relevant impact, national security impact, and to the development and designation of SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and any other relevant impact of specifying critical habitat for Ipomopsis polyantha, Wildlife Service, are designating critical any particular area as critical habitat. Penstemon debilis, and Phacelia habitat for the endangered Ipomopsis The critical habitat areas we are submutica under the Act (16 U.S.C. polyantha (Pagosa skyrocket) and the designating in this rule constitute our 1531 et seq.). For more information on threatened Penstemon debilis current best assessment of the areas that the biology and ecology of I. polyantha, (Parachute beardtongue) and Phacelia meet the definition of critical habitat for P. debilis, and P. submutica, refer to the submutica (DeBeque phacelia) under Ipomopsis polyantha, Penstemon final listing rule published in the the Endangered Species Act (Act). The debilis, and Phacelia submutica. Here Federal Register on July 27, 2011 (76 FR purpose of this regulation is to conserve we are designating: 45054). For information on I. polyantha, these three plant species and their • Approximately 9,641 acres (ac) P. debilis, and P. submutica critical habitats under the Act. (3,902 hectares (ha)), in 4 units, are habitat, refer to the proposed rule to DATES: This rule becomes effective on being designated as critical habitat for designate critical habitat for I. September 12, 2012. Ipomopsis polyantha. polyantha, P. debilis, and P. submutica • Approximately 15,510 ac (6,217 ha), ADDRESSES: This final rule, and the published in the Federal Register on in 4 units, are being designated as associated final economic analysis and July 27, 2011 (76 FR 45078). Information critical habitat for Penstemon debilis. final environmental assessment, are on the associated DEA and draft • Approximately 25,484 ac (10,313 environmental assessment for the available on the Internet at http:// ha), in 9 units, are being designated as www.regulations.gov. The coordinates proposed rule was published in the critical habitat for Phacelia submutica. Federal Register on March 27, 2012 (77 or plot points or both from which the • In total, approximately 50,635 ac FR 18157). maps are generated are included in the (20,432 ha), in 17 units, are being administrative record for this critical designated as critical habitat for the Previous Federal Actions habitat designation and are available at three species. The final rule listing Ipomopsis http://www.fws.gov/mountain-prairie/ We have prepared an economic polyantha as an endangered species, species/plants/3ColoradoPlants/ analysis of the designation of critical and listing Penstemon debilis and index.html, http://www.regulations.gov habitat. In order to consider economic Phacelia submutica as threatened at Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2011–0040, impacts, we have prepared an analysis species, was published on July 27, 2011 and at the Western Colorado Ecological of the economic impacts of the critical (76 FR 45054). Our proposal for Services Office (see FOR FURTHER habitat designations and related factors. designating critical habitat for I. INFORMATION CONTACT). Comments and We announced the availability of the polyantha, P. debilis, and P. submutica materials received, as well as supporting draft economic analysis (DEA) on March was published on the same date (76 FR documentation used in preparing this 27, 2012, allowing the public to provide 45078). Our notice of availability for the final rule, are available for public comments on our analysis. We have DEA and draft environmental inspection, by appointment, during incorporated the comments and are assessment was published on March 27, normal business hours, at the U.S. Fish completed the final economic analysis 2012 (77 FR 18157). For other previous and Wildlife Service, Western Colorado (FEA) concurrently with this final Federal actions, please see our final Ecological Services Office, 764 Horizon determination. listing rule (76 FR 45054). Drive, Suite B, Grand Junction, CO We have prepared an environmental 81506–3946; telephone 970–243–2778; assessment of the designation of critical Summary of Comments and facsimile 970–245–6933. habitat. Based on a court ruling, we Recommendations FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: must undertake National Environmental We requested written comments from Patty Gelatt, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish Policy Act (NEPA) analysis in the Tenth the public on the proposed designation and Wildlife Service, Western Colorado Circuit when we designate critical of critical habitat for Ipomopsis Ecological Services Office, 764 Horizon habitat. We announced the availability polyantha, Penstemon debilis, and Drive, Suite B, Grand Junction, CO of the draft environmental assessment Phacelia submutica during two 81506–3946; telephone 970–243–2778; on March 27, 2012, allowing the public comment periods. The first comment facsimile 970–245–6933. If you use a to provide comments on our assessment. period associated with the publication telecommunications device for the deaf We have incorporated the comments of the proposed critical habitat rule (76 VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:12 Aug 10, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\13AUR3.SGM 13AUR3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 156 / Monday, August 13, 2012 / Rules and Regulations 48369 FR 45078) opened on July 27, 2011, and (1) Comments on the pollinators of (2) Comments on the genetic diversity closed on September 26, 2011. We also Ipomopsis polyantha: One peer of Penstemon debilis: One peer reviewer requested comments on the proposed reviewer questioned some of the provided information relating to genetic critical habitat designation and pollinator information presented for I. diversity, the potential clonal nature, associated DEA during a comment polyantha. This reviewer questioned and connectivity between sites for P. period that opened March 27, 2012, and whether the self-pollination we debilis. Given the underground stems of closed on April 26, 2012 (77 FR 18157). discussed was with or without the P. debilis, the reviewer concluded that We did not receive any requests for a assistance of a pollinator. The reviewer the actual population size has been public hearing. We also contacted also questioned if our pollinator greatly overestimated. The reviewer appropriate Federal, State, and local information for I. polyantha was based provided information relating to agencies; scientific organizations; and on visitor information versus pollinator quantitative, not neutral (genetic other interested parties and invited information, that is, if the insects listed markers that are not directly linked to them to comment on the proposed rule were just visiting the plants, or if they a species fitness), genetic diversity, with and DEA during these comment periods. were actually pollinating the flowers. In several citations in reference to the During the first comment period, we addition, the reviewer wondered if genetic work that has been done for P. received six comment letters directly night-time pollinator experiments, debilis. Another commenter stated that addressing the proposed critical habitat collections, or observations were the genetic diversity work was designation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum
    Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum By Colorado Natural Heritage Program For The Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative June 2011 Colorado Wildlife Action Plan: Proposed Rare Plant Addendum Colorado Rare Plant Conservation Initiative Members David Anderson, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Rob Billerbeck, Colorado Natural Areas Program (CNAP) Leo P. Bruederle, University of Colorado Denver (UCD) Lynn Cleveland, Colorado Federation of Garden Clubs (CFGC) Carol Dawson, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Michelle DePrenger-Levin, Denver Botanic Gardens (DBG) Brian Elliott, Environmental Consulting Mo Ewing, Colorado Open Lands (COL) Tom Grant, Colorado State University (CSU) Jill Handwerk, Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP) Tim Hogan, University of Colorado Herbarium (COLO) Steve Kettler, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Andrew Kratz, U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Sarada Krishnan, Colorado Native Plant Society (CoNPS), Denver Botanic Gardens Brian Kurzel, Colorado Natural Areas Program Eric Lane, Colorado Department of Agriculture (CDA) Paige Lewis, The Nature Conservancy (TNC) Ellen Mayo, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Mitchell McGlaughlin, University of Northern Colorado (UNC) Jennifer Neale, Denver Botanic Gardens Betsy Neely, The Nature Conservancy Ann Oliver, The Nature Conservancy Steve Olson, U.S. Forest Service Susan Spackman Panjabi, Colorado Natural Heritage Program Jeff Peterson, Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Josh Pollock, Center for Native Ecosystems (CNE) Nicola Ripley,
    [Show full text]
  • 39516 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985
    39516 Federal Register / Vol. 50, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 1985 / Rules and Regulations reaction irreversibility or by formation polarography or square-wave (3) Irving, H., “The Stability of Metal of two or more complex species in polarography). Complexes and Their Measurement equilibrium with each other. In this last (3) Interpretation and evaluation of Polarographically," Advances ih case it is necessary to apply the method resu lts, (i) Stability constants Polarography Proceedings of the 2nd by De Ford and Hume paragraph (d) (8) determined for a new substance can be International Congress, Ed. I.S. of this section to calculate stepwise compared with literature values for Langmuir (Pergamon Press, 1960). formation constants. standard substances (see Reference (4) Perrin, D.D., Dempsey, B., B u ffe r (2) Test report, (i) The test report substances, above) and used therefore for pH and Metal Ion Controls. should list for each metal ion to evaluate the strength of its (Chapman and Hall: London, 1974). investigated the half-wave potential complexing ability. (5) “Stability Constants of Metal-ion Complexes,” Part B, Organic Ligands, Ei /2 , co-ordination number and overall (ii) The system is physically stability constant. Compiled by D.D. Perrin, IUPAC meaningful if (A) the value of the Publication on Chemical Data Series, stability constant is positive and (B) the (ii) In addition, the following should No. 22 (Pergamon Press, 1979) also be reported: standard error is less than the constant (6) Grabaric, B., Tkalcec, M., Piljac, L, (A) Type of polarisable micro­ (the t-test should be used as a criterion).
    [Show full text]
  • Pagosa Skyrocket), Penstemon Debilis (Parachute Beardtongue), and Phacelia Submutica (Debeque Phacelia); Proposed Rule
    Vol. 76 Wednesday, No. 144 July 27, 2011 Part IV Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for Ipomopsis polyantha (Pagosa skyrocket), Penstemon debilis (Parachute beardtongue), and Phacelia submutica (DeBeque phacelia); Proposed Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:29 Jul 26, 2011 Jkt 223001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\27JYP3.SGM 27JYP3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS3 45078 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 27, 2011 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Management; U.S. Fish and Wildlife and their possible impacts on proposed Service; 4401 N. Fairfax Drive, MS critical habitat. Fish and Wildlife Service 2042–PDM; Arlington, VA 22203. (4) Information on the projected and We will not accept e-mail or faxed reasonably likely impacts of climate 50 CFR Part 17 comments. We will post all comments change on Ipomopsis polyantha, [Docket No. FWS–R6–ES–2011–0040; MO on http://www.regulations.gov. This Penstemon debilis, and Phacelia 92210–0–0009] generally means that we will post any submutica and proposed critical habitat. personal information you provide us (5) Any probable economic, national RIN 1018–AX75 (see the Public Comments section below security, or other relevant impacts of for more information). designating any area that may be Endangered and Threatened Wildlife FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: included in the final designation; in and Plants; Designation of Critical Allan Pfister, Western Colorado particular, any impacts on small entities Habitat for Ipomopsis polyantha Supervisor, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera: Bombyliidae) in North and South a America
    NORMAN MARST Taxonomic Study of the Known Pupae of the Genus Anthrax (Diptera: Bombyliidae) in North and South A America SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY NUMBER 100 SERIAL PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION The emphasis upon publications as a means of diffusing knowledge was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution. In his formal plan for the Insti- tution, Joseph Henry articulated a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This keynote of basic research has been adhered to over the years in the issuance of thousands of titles in serial publications under the Smithsonian imprint, com- mencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Annals of Flight Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes original articles and monographs dealing with the research and collections of its several museums and offices and of profes- sional colleagues at other institutions of learning. These papers report newly acquired facts, synoptic interpretations of data, or original theory in specialized fields. These publications are distributed by subscription to libraries, laboratories, and other in- terested institutions and specialists throughout the world. Individual copies may be obtained from the Smithsonian Institution Press as long as stocks are available.
    [Show full text]
  • Floral Guilds of Bees in Sagebrush Steppe: Comparing Bee Usage Of
    ABSTRACT: Healthy plant communities of the American sagebrush steppe consist of mostly wind-polli- • nated shrubs and grasses interspersed with a diverse mix of mostly spring-blooming, herbaceous perennial wildflowers. Native, nonsocial bees are their common floral visitors, but their floral associations and abundances are poorly known. Extrapolating from the few available pollination studies, bees are the primary pollinators needed for seed production. Bees, therefore, will underpin the success of ambitious seeding efforts to restore native forbs to impoverished sagebrush steppe communities following vast Floral Guilds of wildfires. This study quantitatively characterized the floral guilds of 17 prevalent wildflower species of the Great Basin that are, or could be, available for restoration seed mixes. More than 3800 bees repre- senting >170 species were sampled from >35,000 plants. Species of Osmia, Andrena, Bombus, Eucera, Bees in Sagebrush Halictus, and Lasioglossum bees prevailed. The most thoroughly collected floral guilds, at Balsamorhiza sagittata and Astragalus filipes, comprised 76 and 85 native bee species, respectively. Pollen-specialists Steppe: Comparing dominated guilds at Lomatium dissectum, Penstemon speciosus, and several congenerics. In contrast, the two native wildflowers used most often in sagebrush steppe seeding mixes—Achillea millefolium and Linum lewisii—attracted the fewest bees, most of them unimportant in the other floral guilds. Suc- Bee Usage of cessfully seeding more of the other wildflowers studied here would greatly improve degraded sagebrush Wildflowers steppe for its diverse native bee communities. Index terms: Apoidea, Asteraceae, Great Basin, oligolecty, restoration Available for Postfire INTRODUCTION twice a decade (Whisenant 1990). Massive Restoration wildfires are burning record acreages of the The American sagebrush steppe grows American West; two fires in 2007 together across the basins and foothills over much burned >500,000 ha of shrub-steppe and 1,3 James H.
    [Show full text]
  • Searles Mazzacano Pollinators - September 12, 2016 Who Pollinates? Who Pollinates?
    Understanding and sustaining Insect Pollinators insect pollinators in your garden A. Importance of pollinators B. Cast of characters C. Creating habitat Mining bee; CASM Celeste A. Searles Mazzacano, Ph.D. D. Sustaining habitat Presented for EMSWCD E. Projects & resources Flower scarab; CASM © 2016 C. A. Searles Mazzacano yellow-faced bumble bee; C.A.S. Mazzacano 1 2 Why are pollinators important? Why are pollinators important? • pollination: transfer of pollen • 70% of flowering plants within or between flowers for pollinated by insects fertilization, seed & fruit set • ~1,000 plants grown • wind, insects, birds, mammals worldwide for food, fibers, drinks, spices, & medicine honey bee; C.A.S. Mazzacano pollinated by animals Bat Conservation International • most pollinated by bees Importance of bees to food production Bumble bee on echinacea; (Wilson & Carrill, 2016) Wikimedia Commons 3 4 Searles Mazzacano_Pollinators - September 12, 2016 Who pollinates? Who pollinates? More than bees!!!!! sand wasp; C.A.S. Mazzacano More than insects!!!!! • Wasps • Bats • Flies Tayler/naturepl.com • Hummingbirds • Beetles • Moths & butterflies Bee fly; C.A.S. Mazzacano C.A.S. Mazzacano 5 6 Who pollinates? Who pollinates? summer leafcutter bee, Bumble bee; C.A.S. Mazzacano “Managed” bees are Crown Bees catalog Much more than economically important European honey bees!!!!! • honey bees, bumble bees, - native bees (> 4000 NA spp.) orchard mason bees, alfalfa leafcutter bees ‣ social: bumble bees ‣ solitary: mining, mason, leafcutter, orchard, sweat, digger, and carpenter bees Sweat bee; C.A.S. Mazzacano CA almond grove; Kathy Keatley Garvey 7 8 Searles Mazzacano_Pollinators - September 12, 2016 Challenges for pollinators Challenges for pollinators Many stressors • Colony Collapse Disorder (2006) in managed honey • habitat loss bee hives • pesticides fouldbrood-infected larvae; Univ.
    [Show full text]
  • Cathedral Bluff Meadow-Rue): a Technical Conservation Assessment
    Thalictrum heliophilum Wilken & DeMott (Cathedral Bluff meadow-rue): A Technical Conservation Assessment Prepared for the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Species Conservation Project January 4, 2007 Susan Spackman Panjabi and David G. Anderson Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO Peer Review Administered by Society for Conservation Biology Panjabi, S.S. and D.G. Anderson. (2007, January 4). Thalictrum heliophilum Wilken & DeMott (Cathedral Bluff meadow-rue): a technical conservation assessment. [Online]. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region. Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/projects/scp/assessments/thalictrumheliophilum.pdf [date of access]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was facilitated by the helpfulness and generosity of many experts, particularly Carla Scheck, Peggy Lyon, Renee Rondeau, Barry Johnston, and Tamara Meagley. Their interest in the project and time spent answering questions were extremely valuable and their insights into the distribution, habitat, and ecology of Thalictrum heliophilum were crucial to this project. Thanks also to Greg Hayward, Gary Patton, Kathy Roche, and Joy Bartlett for assisting with questions and project management. Thanks to Kimberly Nguyen for the work on the layout and for bringing this assessment to Web publication. Mary Olivas provided crucial financial oversight. Annette Miller provided information for the report on seed storage status. Drs. Ron Hartman and Ernie Nelson provided access to specimens of T. heliophilum at the Rocky Mountain Herbarium, and Jennifer Ackerfield provided access to specimens from the Colorado State University Herbarium. Nan Lederer and Tim Hogan provided valuable assistance and insights at the Colorado University Herbarium. Jessica Andersen assisted with data and literature acquisition. Special thanks to Karin Decker and Arvind Panjabi who reviewed part or all of the first draft of this document and offered input.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Vespidae)
    RECORDS AND FLOWER PREFERENCES OF MASARID WASPS (HYMENOPTERA: VESPIDAE) BY KENNETH W. COOPER (Princeton University) and J. BEQUAERT (Harvard University) The observations which follow on the masarid wasps in Colorado are based largely upon collections made (by KWC) in the vicinity of th.e Science L.odge of the University of Colorado during the in- terval July 26--August 21, 199. Additional flower records and information upon eleven species of Ps,eudomasaris from Arizon,a, California, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas and Utah, as well as from Colorado, are included (by JB) from previously unpublished notes. All records, therefore, rest on the authority of Dr. J. Bequaert if they are not initialled "(KWC)". Science Lodge, it should be re.marked, is located at the margin of Arapaho Moraine, below Mount Niwot, approximately eight miles NNW of the town of Nederland, Colorado, at an altitude of 9,528 ft., just three miles East of the Continental Divide. It is thus in the uppermost fourth of Ramaley's "Montane Zone", heavy stands of lodgepole pine char.acterizing the region. Road margins and clearings were frequently densely populated with flowers very at- tractive to aculeate Hymen'optera, and collecting could hardly have been better. The varied terrain with prcdoninantly ponderosa pine-Douglas fir forests below, subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce stands and tundra bove, all make Science Lodge located in the intermediate lodgepole pine forest ideally situated as a central base for the field naturalist. The records which follow may bc added to those of Bradley (1922) and Bequaert (1929, 190, 193). As many of the older records of Ps.eudomasaris flower preferences are tod,ay uncertain because of o,bvious misidentification of the plant concerned, it is very important that all new records be validated by authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO Rnati VE PLANT -SOCIETY NEWSLETTER Volume 10, Number 3
    COLORADO rNATI VE PLANT -SOCIETY NEWSLETTER Volume 10, Number 3 May 1986 "DEDICATED TO THE APPRECIATION AND CONSERVATION OF THE COLORADO FLORAl! •••••••--•••-----.--•••JIIL••••••••••••••••---­•••••••••• • iV_ ••••••1Ir6 • • ~ • • .rv••wwr....• It¥_ •••••••• _ ••~ -.r_ ••• *'*Ywrtr• .......·······--IIUI····················1r. -.rwr..__••••_TV••••••••• - • ­ ACTIONS FROM THE BOARD! \fuat's new from your Board of Directors? CONPS is to have a display at the Alpine 86 conference in Boulder, June 28 - July 2. Anna Thurston is coordinator, so if you would like to help, please call Anna at 433-3705. TALLGRASS PRAIRIE RESEARCH Planning goes forward on the Rare Plant Publication. Anyone A management plan for the ~,interested in joining the working Colorado Tallgrass Prairie Natural ~ group will be most welcome. Please Area is nearly complete. The Colo­ call Eleanor Von Bargen, 756-1400. rado Natural Areas Program, City of The first effort will be in assemb­ Boulder and other pertinant agen­ ling photographs and technical data cies and organizations, including on the species selected for inclu­ the Colorado Native Plant Society, sion. This is one of the larger have developed grazing and burning enterprises that CONPS has prescriptions for the 270 acre undertaken, and the board solicits natural area. Intensive monitoring your active involvement! will determine if the types of After a highly successful management are suitable for these first year of workshops, with relict tallgrass communities. Con­ excellent speakers and challenging tact Virginia Crosby, 666-5303, if topics, the board decided to insti­ you are interested in working on tute modest fees for workshops in the floristic survey. Permanent the future, to cover expenses. vegetation transects will be estab­ Registration procedures will be lished and sampled.
    [Show full text]
  • Wasps and Bees in Southern Africa
    SANBI Biodiversity Series 24 Wasps and bees in southern Africa by Sarah K. Gess and Friedrich W. Gess Department of Entomology, Albany Museum and Rhodes University, Grahamstown Pretoria 2014 SANBI Biodiversity Series The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) was established on 1 Sep- tember 2004 through the signing into force of the National Environmental Manage- ment: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) No. 10 of 2004 by President Thabo Mbeki. The Act expands the mandate of the former National Botanical Institute to include respon- sibilities relating to the full diversity of South Africa’s fauna and flora, and builds on the internationally respected programmes in conservation, research, education and visitor services developed by the National Botanical Institute and its predecessors over the past century. The vision of SANBI: Biodiversity richness for all South Africans. SANBI’s mission is to champion the exploration, conservation, sustainable use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. SANBI Biodiversity Series publishes occasional reports on projects, technologies, workshops, symposia and other activities initiated by, or executed in partnership with SANBI. Technical editing: Alicia Grobler Design & layout: Sandra Turck Cover design: Sandra Turck How to cite this publication: GESS, S.K. & GESS, F.W. 2014. Wasps and bees in southern Africa. SANBI Biodi- versity Series 24. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. ISBN: 978-1-919976-73-0 Manuscript submitted 2011 Copyright © 2014 by South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form without written per- mission of the copyright owners. The views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of SANBI.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX A13 US FOREST SERVICE SENSITIVE SPECIES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM for the State Highway 9 Iron Springs Alignment Environmental Assessment
    APPENDIX A13 US FOREST SERVICE SENSITIVE SPECIES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM FOR THE State Highway 9 Iron Springs Alignment Environmental Assessment Prepared for COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION Prepared by JEFF PETERSON COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAMS BRANCH April 2014 USFS Sensitive Species for the State Highway 9 Iron Springs Alignment EA CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 Proposed Action .............................................................................................................. 1 No Action Alternative ..................................................................................................... 3 Applicable Statutes and Regulations ............................................................................. 5 Federal ............................................................................................................................ 5 White River National Forest – Revised Land and Resource Management Plan ..................... 5 Issues: Possibility of impacting the USFS Sensitive Species ........................................... 5 Method of Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 5 Historical Precedent from Other Activities Proposed for this Area ............................... 6 Other Uses: Recreation .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]