Palo Verde Ranch Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Palo Verde Ranch Project Palo Verde Ranch Project Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Report May 13, 2015 Prepared for: Prepared by: Cal Alpine LLC HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc. 4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 1550 7578 El Cajon Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92660 La Mesa, CA 91942 I certify that the information in this survey report and attached exhibits fully and accurately represent our work: Jasmine Bakker Erica Harris Rob Hogenauer Palo Verde Ranch Project Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................... 1 2.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................ 1 2.1 Habitat Assessment ............................................................................................. 1 2.2 Focused QCB Surveys ........................................................................................ 1 2.3 Nomenclature ...................................................................................................... 2 3.0 RESULTS .................................................................................................................. 2 4.0 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF APPENDICES A Survey Information B Survey Forms and Field Notes C Butterfly Checklist LIST OF FIGURES No. Title Follows Page No. 1 Regional Location .......................................................................................................2 2 Project Vicinity Map (USGS Topography) ................................................................2 3 Aerial Photograph .......................................................................................................2 4 Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Host Plant Locations ....................................................2 i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of HELIX Environmental Planning, Inc.’s (HELIX’s) 2015 Quino checkerspot butterfly (Euphydryas editha quino; QCB) survey of the Palo Verde Ranch Project site (project). HELIX biologists performed the protocol survey (comprised of 7 site visits) under HELIX’s Threatened/Endangered Species Permit No. TE778195. The approximately 540-acre study area for the project is located within the east-central portion of unincorporated San Diego County, California (Figure 1). It is further located within Sections 1 and 2 of Township 16 South, Range 2 East of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute Viejas Mountain quadrangle maps (Figure 2). Elevations within the study area range between approximately 1,480 feet to 2,250 feet above mean sea level. An aerial photograph of the parcel in included as Figure 3. 2.0 METHODS 2.1 HABITAT ASSESSMENT A habitat assessment was conducted on February 11, 2015 by HELIX biologist Jasmine Bakker The majority of the project site and surrounding habitat is characterized by dense southern mixed chaparral which forms a closed canopy and is inaccessible to pedestrian access. This habitat is unsuitable for QCB and is excluded from the survey area based on the current USFWS Survey Guidelines (USFWS 2014). Approximately 12.9 acres of the 540-acre study area, roughly 2 percent, were mapped as potentially suitable habitat during Ms. Bakker’s assessment. The current survey area for the 2015 QCB survey is depicted in Figure 4. The mapped survey area consists of small pockets of bare ground surrounded by dense shrubs. However, large portions of the mapped survey area still consist of fairly dense shrubs which required surveyors to physically move branches in order to navigate the area; areas too dense to navigate were not surveyed during the site visits. 2.2 FOCUSED QCB SURVEYS Seven protocol site visits were conducted by Ms. Bakker and HELIX biologists Erica Harris and Rob Hogenauer (Table 1). HELIX biologists Tara Baxter, Laura Moreton, Benjamin Rosenbaum, and George Aldridge participated as supervised individuals. Pedestrian surveys consisted of walking roughly parallel transects through appropriate habitat and identifying butterflies by sight and with the aid of binoculars. Larval host plants were mapped with the aid of hand-held Global Positioning System (GPS) units, and potential nectar plant species were also documented (Figure 4). Surveyors covered between 1 and 5 acres per hour. In accordance with the current QCB guidelines, the surveys began the third week of February and were anticipated to continue to the second Saturday in May. Specifically, surveys were conducted between February 17 and March 31, 2015. The first QCB in Riverside County was reported at Oak Mountain by Adam Malisch on February 26, 2015 (Quino Biologists United 2015). The first QCB in San Diego County was reported at Marron Valley by Alison Anderson Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Report for the Palo Verde Ranch Project / CAA-01 / May13, 2015 1 on March 12, 2015; however, additional sightings of QCB within San Diego County were limited. Protocol surveys were terminated prior to the end of the survey period due to the on-site condition of host plants and nectaring resources in addition to the lack of regional QCB sightings. Few nectaring resources were observed on the March 31 survey and the number of host plants present was significantly lower than during previous surveys. Host plants and the majority of nectaring plants had already set seed and had begun to senescence. 2.3 NOMENCLATURE Identification of butterflies was based on personal knowledge, museum specimens, the San Diego Natural History Museum website, and field guides by Shiraiwa (2009) and Glassberg (2001). Other nomenclature for this report is taken from Holland (1986) and Oberbauer (2008) for vegetation communities and Baldwin et al. (2012) for plants. 3.0 RESULTS Dates, times, and weather conditions at the start and finish of each site visit are presented in Appendix A. Copies of field notes taken are provided as Appendix B. A list of total butterflies observed during the 2015 protocol QCB surveys is included as Appendix C. The 540-acre study area is comprised of 7 vegetation communities: freshwater marsh, southern cottonwood-willow riparian forest, coast live oak woodland, southern willow scrub, southern mixed chaparral, chamise chaparral, and Diegan coastal sage scrub. Two larval host plants were observed during the survey in various locations: dwarf plantain (Plantago erecta) and purple owl’s clover (Castilleja exserta). Host plant locations are illustrated in Figure 4. Dwarf plantain was primarily found along the main access road and adjacent disturbed areas. Purple owl’s clover was present in dense stands within natural openings in the chaparral and as scattered individuals along portions of the main access road. In addition, potential nectaring resources (e.g., popcorn flower [Cryptantha/Plagiobothrys spp.], fiddleneck [Amsinckia menziesii var. intermedia], California buckwheat [Eriogonum fasciculatum], and ground pink [Linanthus dianthiflorus]) were observed during the survey. Surveyors observed a total of 273 individuals during the 7 site visits comprised of 15 butterfly species; however, no QCB was observed. While the QCB flight season had a very limited number of QCB observed across its range, QCB host plants and nectaring resources were generally present in good numbers across the region. QCB host plants were generally restricted to several small open areas within dense stands of chaparral and along disturbed areas such as the main access road. Based on surveys conducted in a good habitat condition year, as 2015 appears to have been, the probability of QCB occurring on the site is considered low. Quino Checkerspot Butterfly Survey Report for the Palo Verde Ranch Project / CAA-01 / May13, 2015 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORANGE SAN DIEGO Vail Lake COUNTY COUNTY Fallbrook A¨ O'Neill Lake Aª Warner Springs Camp Pendleton Lake Henshaw WÛ Oceanside !"^$ A©Vista Lake Wohlford San Marcos Escondido Carlsbad Sutherland Lake San Marcos Reservoir !"a$ A© A© Julian Encinitas Lake WÛ Hodges Lake Ramona Ramona Lake Poway ?z Solana Beach Poway Del Mar WÙ ?z56 San Vicente Reservoir San Diego Miramar Reservoir ?z El Capitan Reservoir Pacific %&s( Santee Lake Jennings Ocean Santee !"_$ ?h Lakes La Jolla Aª !"^$ AÒ Alpine El Cajon ! Lake Murray Aù A× Project Site !"_$ Loveland Reservoir La Mesa ?j A£ Lemon AÀ Grove !"a$ AÀ Coronado Sweetwater Barrett Lake Reservoir S a National n D City ?j i e g Otay Reservoir o Dulzura San Diego B a y Chula Vista A× %&s( Imperial Beach !"^$ Otay AÛ UNITED STATES MEXICO Tijuana I:\PROJECTS\C\CAA\CAA-01_PaloVerdeRanch\Map\QCB_Report\Fig1_Regional.mxd CAA-01 05/07/15 -CL Regional Location Map PALO VERDE RANCH 0 8 N Miles Figure 1 Project Site ! I:\PROJECTS\C\CAA\CAA-01_PaloVerdeRanch\Map\QCB_Report\Fig2_USGS.mxd CAA-01 05/07/15 -CL Project Vicinity Map (USGS Topography) PALO VERDE RANCH 0 2,000 N Feet Figure 2 Via Donito Via Dieguenos Camino Christina Via Dieguenos Calle Mia Via Viejas Project Site Via Palo Verde Lago ! Corte Alejandro Old Spur Drive Corte Verde Corte Loma Grey Mare Court Spanish Bit Drive Corte Roca Japatul Road I:\PROJECTS\C\CAA\CAA-01_PaloVerdeRanch\Map\QCB_Report\Fig3_Aerial.mxd CAA-01 05/07/15 -CL Aerial Photograph PALO VERDE RANCH 0 1,250 N Feet Figure 3 Calle Colina Roca Via Palo Verde Lago Project Site Via Dieguenos Via Cielo Azul !( ! !( !( !( !( #*#*#* !( #* Corte Alejandro Old Spur Drive !( Corte Loma !(!(
Recommended publications
  • Biological Technical Report for the Nichols Mine Project
    Biological Technical Report for the Nichols Mine Project June 8, 2016 Prepared for: Nichols Road Partners, LLC P.O. Box 77850 Corona, CA 92877 Prepared by: Alden Environmental, Inc. 3245 University Avenue, #1188 San Diego, CA 92104 Nichols Road Mine Project Biological Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 1.1 Project Location ..................................................................................................1 1.2 Project Description ..............................................................................................1 2.0 METHODS & SURVEY LIMITATIONS .................................................................1 2.1 Literature Review ................................................................................................1 2.2 Biological Surveys ..............................................................................................2 2.2.1 Vegetation Mapping..................................................................................3 2.2.2 Jurisdictional Delineations of Waters of U.S. and Waters of the State ....4 2.2.3 Sensitive Species Surveys .........................................................................4 2.2.4 Survey Limitations ....................................................................................5 2.2.5 Nomenclature ............................................................................................5 3.0 REGULATORY
    [Show full text]
  • Butterfly and Punt Partners of the Butterfly Garden (K-6)
    BUTTERFLY AND PUNT PARTNERS OF THE BUTTERFLY GARDEN (K-6) Acmon Blue (Icaricia acmon) Non-migratory: Adults seen spring through fall Larval Diet: Buckwheat, lupine, clover and many kinds of legumes. Size: 3/4"-I" Description: Bluish-purple in color; orange edge at the base of hind wing; large orange spots under the hind wing. Adults seen in many communities. Did You Know? Eggs are laid on the host plant from January onward, and the butterflies pupate in leaf litter beneath the plants. larval stage feeds on: California Buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum) Origin: Native Plant Size: 1' - 2' tall shrub with long stalks Leaf Description: Small course leaves attached to long branching stems. The underside of the leaves are covered in a soft, white fuzz. Flower Description: Large compound head with white flowers. Blooms from March to October. Did you know? Buckwheat is one of the few acceptable food plants for the acmon blue butterfly. Echo Blue (Celastrina ladon echo) Non-migratory: However, its range extends from Alaska to Central America Larval Diet: Many different plants, including wild lilac/ceanothus, buckeye, chamise, lotus and huckleberry. Caterpillar's eat buds, flowers, leaves and young fruit. Size: 7/8"-1 1/4" Description: Light purple; front wing tips bordered in black; hind wings bordered in white. Can live in all local communities Did You Know? Larvae are often cared for by ants. larval stage feeds on: Ceanothus or Wild Lilac (Ceanothus spp.) Origin: Native Plant Size: Chaparral shrub can be 6' tall or more. Leaf Description: Small tough evergreen leaves on very stiff branches; brilliant glossy green above, dull below.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera of the Tolman Bridge Area (2000-2011)
    LEPIDOPTERA OF THE TOLMAN BRIDGE AREA, ALBERTA, 2000-2011 Charles Bird, 8 March 2012 Box 22, Erskine, AB T0C 1G0 [email protected] The present paper includes a number of redeterminations and additions to the information in earlier reports. It also follows the up-to-date order and taxonomy of Pohl et al. (2010), rather than that of Hodges et al. (1983). Brian Scholtens, Greg Pohl and Jean-François Landry collecting moths at a sheet illuminated by a mercury vapor (MV) light, Tolman Bridge, 24 July 2003, during the 2003 Olds meetings of the Lepidopterist’s Society (C.D. Bird image). Tolman Bridge, is located in the valley of the Red Deer River, 18 km (10 miles) east of the town of Trochu. The bridge and adjoining Park land are in the north half of section 14, range 22, township 34, west of the Fourth Meridian. The coordinates at the bridge are 51.503N and 113.009W. The elevation ranges from around 600 m at the river to 800 m or so near the top of the river breaks. In a Natural Area Inspection Report dated 25 June 1982 and in the 1989 Trochu 82 P/14, 1:50,000 topographic map, the land southwest of the bridge was designated as the “Tolman Bridge Municipal Park” while that southeast of the bridge was referred to as the “Tolman Bridge Recreation Area”. In an Alberta, Department of the Environment, Parks and Protected Areas Division paper dated 9 May 2000, the areas on both sides of the river are included in “Dry Island Buffalo Jump Provincial Park”.
    [Show full text]
  • Invertebrates
    State Wildlife Action Plan Update Appendix A-5 Species of Greatest Conservation Need Fact Sheets INVERTEBRATES Conservation Status and Concern Biology and Life History Distribution and Abundance Habitat Needs Stressors Conservation Actions Needed Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 2015 Appendix A-5 SGCN Invertebrates – Fact Sheets Table of Contents What is Included in Appendix A-5 1 MILLIPEDE 2 LESCHI’S MILLIPEDE (Leschius mcallisteri)........................................................................................................... 2 MAYFLIES 4 MAYFLIES (Ephemeroptera) ................................................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Cinygmula gartrelli) .................................................................................................................... 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia falcula) ............................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia jenseni) ............................................................................................................ 4 [unnamed] (Siphlonurus autumnalis) .............................................................................................................. 4 [unnamed] (Cinygmula gartrelli) .................................................................................................................... 4 [unnamed] (Paraleptophlebia falcula) ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UPLAND ANIMALS Birds
    ANIMALS Of THE REfUGE AT THE ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER UPLAND ANIMALS Birds Anna's Hummingbird (Calypte anna) Diet: Feeds on nectar, water, spiders, and tree sap Size: 3 1/2" -4" in length Description: Male has a deep rose red head and throat; female's throat has reddish flecks; both have grayish underparts washed with green. Did You Know? This is the only hummingbird in this area that does not migrate. Barn Owl (Tyto alba) Diet: Small mammals £fee;14"-20"inlength Description: Pale face with dark eyes; heart-shaped outline around the face; rusty brown upper parts; underparts vary from white to cinnamon. Did you know ? The barn owl nests and roosts in dark cavities in buildings, cliffs, and trees in the upland, they hunt at night for small mammals in the salt marsh. Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustled) Migratory: migrates to S outh America in the winter. Diet: Insects Size: 5 3/4" - 7 3/4" in length Description: Iridescent blue back, with a cinnamon colored belly and throat. Most distinctive is a long, deeply forked tail. Didyou know? The barn swallow builds its open cup shaped nest under bridges, or on building walls with mud collected from the salt marsh and mudflats. These birds drink, eat, and bathe while flying. Cliff Swallow (Hirundopyrrhonotd) Migratory: Breeds in the spring and summer in North America. Migrates south in the fall to winter in South America, from Paraguay to coastal and southeast Brazil. Diet: Insects and berries Size: 5 Vz" in length Description: Identified by its square tail with buff orange colored rump and blackish throat.
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Baja California Norte, Mexico
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Specimen Records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895
    Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 2019 Vol 3(2) Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895 Jon H. Shepard Paul C. Hammond Christopher J. Marshall Oregon State Arthropod Collection, Department of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis OR 97331 Cite this work, including the attached dataset, as: Shepard, J. S, P. C. Hammond, C. J. Marshall. 2019. Specimen records for North American Lepidoptera (Insecta) in the Oregon State Arthropod Collection. Lycaenidae Leach, 1815 and Riodinidae Grote, 1895. Catalog: Oregon State Arthropod Collection 3(2). (beta version). http://dx.doi.org/10.5399/osu/cat_osac.3.2.4594 Introduction These records were generated using funds from the LepNet project (Seltmann) - a national effort to create digital records for North American Lepidoptera. The dataset published herein contains the label data for all North American specimens of Lycaenidae and Riodinidae residing at the Oregon State Arthropod Collection as of March 2019. A beta version of these data records will be made available on the OSAC server (http://osac.oregonstate.edu/IPT) at the time of this publication. The beta version will be replaced in the near future with an official release (version 1.0), which will be archived as a supplemental file to this paper. Methods Basic digitization protocols and metadata standards can be found in (Shepard et al. 2018). Identifications were confirmed by Jon Shepard and Paul Hammond prior to digitization. Nomenclature follows that of (Pelham 2008). Results The holdings in these two families are extensive. Combined, they make up 25,743 specimens (24,598 Lycanidae and 1145 Riodinidae).
    [Show full text]
  • And Mission Blue Butterfly Populations Found at Milagra Ridge and the Mission Blue Butterfly Population at Marin Headlands Are Managed by the GGNRA
    San Bruno Elfin Butterfly (Callophrys mossii bayensis) and Mission Blue Butterfly (Icaricia icarioides missionensis) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo by Patrick Kobernus: Adult male mission blue butterfly. Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento, California February 2010 5-YEAR REVIEW San Bruno Elfin Butterfly (Callophrys mossii bayensis) and Mission blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides missionensis) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Ts Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports
    DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE REPORTS DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE REPORTS DENVER MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE & SCIENCE OF NATURE DENVER MUSEUM NUMBER 16, OCTOBER 11, 2019 SCIENCE.DMNS.ORG/MUSEUM-PUBLICATIONS Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports 2001 Colorado Boulevard (Print) ISSN 2374-7730 Denver, CO 80205, U.S.A. Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports (Online) ISSN 2374-7749 REPORTS • NUMBER 16 • OCTOBER 11, 2019 • NUMBER 16 OCTOBER Cover photo: Oreas Anglewing (Polygonia oreas nigrozephyrus Scott, 1984), Gregory Canyon, Boulder County, Colorado, USA, 2 October 1973, leg. Michael G. Pogue. Photo: Bob Livingston. The Denver Museum of Nature & Science Reports (ISSN Frank Krell, PhD, Editor and Production 2374-7730 [print], ISSN 2374-7749 [online]) is an open- access, non peer-reviewed scientifi c journal publishing papers about DMNS research, collections, or other Program and Abstracts Museum related topics, generally authored or co-authored 30th Annual Meeting by Museum staff or associates. Peer review will only be arranged on request of the authors. of the High Country Lepidopterists October 11–12, 2019 The journal is available online at science.dmns.org/ Museum-Publications free of charge. Paper copies Denver Museum of Nature & Science are available for purchase from our print-on-demand publisher Lulu (www.lulu.com). DMNS owns the copyright of the works published in the Reports, which are Frank-Thorsten Krell (Ed.) published under the Creative Commons Attribution Non- Commercial license. For commercial use of published
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Butterflies and Their Biology to Forward Such for Inclusion in the Larger Study
    Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 39(2). 1985. 95-118 NEV ADA BUTTERFLIES: PRELIMINARY CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION GEORGE T. AUSTIN Nevada State Museum and Historical Society, 700 Twin Lakes Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 ABSTRACT. The distribution by county of the 189 species (over 300 taxa) of but­ terflies occurring in Nevada is presented along with a list of species incorrectly recorded for the state. There are still large areas which are poorly or not collected. Nevada continues as one of the remaining unknown areas in our knowledge of butterfly distribution in North America. Although a com­ prehensive work on the state's butterflies is in preparation, there is sufficient demand for a preliminary checklist to justify the following. It is hoped this will stimulate those who have any data on Nevada butterflies and their biology to forward such for inclusion in the larger study. Studies of Nevada butterflies are hampered by a paucity of resident collectors, a large number of mountain and valley systems and vast areas with little or no access. Non-resident collectors usually funnel into known and well worked areas, and, although their data are valu­ able, large areas of the state remain uncollected. Intensive collecting, with emphasis on poorly known areas, over the past seven years by Nevada State Museum personnel and associates has gone far to clarify butterfly distribution within the state. The gaps in knowledge are now more narrowly identifiable and will be filled during the next few sea­ sons. There is no all encompassing treatment of Nevada's butterfly fauna. The only state list is an informal recent checklist of species (Harjes, 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • A SKELETON CHECKLIST of the BUTTERFLIES of the UNITED STATES and CANADA Preparatory to Publication of the Catalogue Jonathan P
    A SKELETON CHECKLIST OF THE BUTTERFLIES OF THE UNITED STATES AND CANADA Preparatory to publication of the Catalogue © Jonathan P. Pelham August 2006 Superfamily HESPERIOIDEA Latreille, 1809 Family Hesperiidae Latreille, 1809 Subfamily Eudaminae Mabille, 1877 PHOCIDES Hübner, [1819] = Erycides Hübner, [1819] = Dysenius Scudder, 1872 *1. Phocides pigmalion (Cramer, 1779) = tenuistriga Mabille & Boullet, 1912 a. Phocides pigmalion okeechobee (Worthington, 1881) 2. Phocides belus (Godman and Salvin, 1890) *3. Phocides polybius (Fabricius, 1793) =‡palemon (Cramer, 1777) Homonym = cruentus Hübner, [1819] = palaemonides Röber, 1925 = ab. ‡"gunderi" R. C. Williams & Bell, 1931 a. Phocides polybius lilea (Reakirt, [1867]) = albicilla (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) = socius (Butler & Druce, 1872) =‡cruentus (Scudder, 1872) Homonym = sanguinea (Scudder, 1872) = imbreus (Plötz, 1879) = spurius (Mabille, 1880) = decolor (Mabille, 1880) = albiciliata Röber, 1925 PROTEIDES Hübner, [1819] = Dicranaspis Mabille, [1879] 4. Proteides mercurius (Fabricius, 1787) a. Proteides mercurius mercurius (Fabricius, 1787) =‡idas (Cramer, 1779) Homonym b. Proteides mercurius sanantonio (Lucas, 1857) EPARGYREUS Hübner, [1819] = Eridamus Burmeister, 1875 5. Epargyreus zestos (Geyer, 1832) a. Epargyreus zestos zestos (Geyer, 1832) = oberon (Worthington, 1881) = arsaces Mabille, 1903 6. Epargyreus clarus (Cramer, 1775) a. Epargyreus clarus clarus (Cramer, 1775) =‡tityrus (Fabricius, 1775) Homonym = argentosus Hayward, 1933 = argenteola (Matsumura, 1940) = ab. ‡"obliteratus"
    [Show full text]
  • OC Butterfly Host Plants.Xlsx
    plant scientific plant common butterfly scientific butterfly common Acmispon glaber Deerweed Callophrys perplexa Bramble Hairstreak Acmispon glaber Deerweed Colias eurytheme Orange Sulphur Acmispon glaber Deerweed Erynnis funeralis Funereal Duskywing Acmispon glaber Deerweed Glaucopsyche lygdamus Silvery Blue Acmispon glaber Deerweed Plebejus acmon Acmon Blue Acmispon glaber Deerweed Strymon avalona Avalon Hairstreak Amorpha californica False Indigo Leptotes marina Marine Blue Amorpha californica False indigo Strymon melinus Gray Hairstreak Amorpha californica False Indigo Zerene eurydice California Dogface Amsinckia sp. Fiddleneck Vanessa cardui Painted Lady Antirrhinum sp. Snapdragon Junonia coenia Buckeye Artemisia sp. Sagebrush Vanessa virginiensis American Lady Asclepias californica California Milkweed Danaus plexippus Monarch Asclepias eriocarpa Indian Milkweed Danaus plexippus Monarch Asclepias fascicularis Narrow-leafed Milkweed Danaus plexippus Monarch Astragalus douglasii Douglas's Milkvetch Colias alexandra harfordii Harford's Sulphur Astragalus douglasii Douglas's Milkvetch Cupido amyntula Western Tailed-Blue Atriplex sp. Saltbush Brephidium exilis Western Pygmy Blue Baccharis glutinosa Marsh Baccharis Calephelis nemesis Fatal Metalmark Bebbia juncea Sweetbush Calephelis wrighti Wright's Metalmark Castilleja sp. Indian Paintbrush Chlosyne leanira Leanira Checkerspot Caulanthus lasiophyllus California Mustard Pontia sisymbrii Spring White Ceanothus spp. Buckbrush Celastrina argiolus echo Echo Blue Ceanothus spp. Buckbrush Nymphalis
    [Show full text]