DOCSLIB.ORG

From Greenschist to Granulite: A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Greenschist to Granulite: A From greenschist to granulite: A mineral equilibria approach to melting and melt loss Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Adelaide for an Honours Degree in Geology Kiara Louise Bockmann November 2015 Kiara Bockmann Melt loss and melt reintegration modelling FROM GREENSCHIST TO GRANULITE: A MINERAL EQUILIBRIA APPROACH TO MELTING AND MELT LOSS RUNNING TITLE: MELT LOSS AND MELT REINTEGRATION MODELLING ABSTRACT Melt loss during regional high-grade metamorphism has important consequences for interpreting the metamorphic evolution of the lower crust and for understanding processes leading to the chemical differentiation of the crust. However, melt loss typically modifies the protolith; making it difficult to reconstruct the conditions of prograde metamorphism and the extent to which melt loss modified the rock composition. The Reynolds Range in central Australia preserves a rare example where a single melt-prone stratigraphic unit can be traced from greenschist to granulite grade conditions. Using this as a natural laboratory, P–T mineral equilibria forward models have been calculated to explore melt loss and melt reintegration where both the protolith and the residuum compositions are preserved. Incremental melt loss modelling from the protolith composition along an isobaric heating path at 5 kbar shows that the residual granulite facies rock composition is consistent with around 18% melt loss from the protolith. Large-scale, one-step melt loss from a closed rock system that had built up 18% melt resulted in a similar residual composition to incremental melt loss. The fertility of the open (incremental) system and the closed system showed the closed system produced 5.4% more melt along a heating path from 700–800 °C. Determination of the concentrations of K–U–Th with increasing metamorphic grade shows that K and U concentrations decreased with increasing metamorphic grade. Conversely, Th concentrations increased, resulting in a slight overall increase in heat production from the protolith to the residuum, despite around 18% volume loss associated with melt extraction. An implication for this is that for melt prone rocks such as metapelites, melt loss during granulite facies metamorphism does not deplete the concentration of heat producing elements in the lower crust as is typically assumed. KEYWORDS Metamorphic; Reynolds Range; pseudosection; melt loss; melt reintegration; THERMOCALC; catastrophic melting; heat production MINERAL ABBREVIATIONS bi, biotite; mu, muscovite; chl, chlorite; ma, margarite; g, garnet; opx, orthopyroxene; sill, sillimanite; ky, kyanite; and, andalusite; sp, spinel; mt, magnetite; cd, cordierite; liq, silicate melt; ksp, K-feldspar; q, quartz; pl, plagioclase; ep, epidote; ru, rutile; st, staurolite; hem, hematite; ilm, ilmenite. 3 Kiara Bockmann Melt loss and melt reintegration modelling TABLE OF CONTENTS From greenschist to granulite: A mineral equilibria approach to melting and melt loss .. 3 Running title: Melt loss and melt reintegration modelling ............................................... 3 Abstract ............................................................................................................................. 3 Keywords .......................................................................................................................... 3 Mineral abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures and Tables ................................................................................................. 6 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 7 2. Geological background ................................................................................................. 8 2.1. Geological setting .................................................................................................................... 8 2.2. Field-based metamorphic geology ......................................................................................... 10 3. Analytical Methods ..................................................................................................... 13 3.1. Bulk rock and mineral chemistry ........................................................................................... 13 3.2. Mineral equilibria modelling ................................................................................................. 14 3.2.1 Melt loss and melt reintegration modelling ..................................................................... 16 3.3. KUTh concentration .............................................................................................................. 18 4. Results ......................................................................................................................... 19 4.1. Metamorphic geology ............................................................................................................ 19 4.1.1. Metamorphic petrography ............................................................................................... 19 4.1.2. Geochemistry and mineral chemistry ............................................................................. 21 4.2. Pressure-temperature pseudosections ...................................................................... 22 4.2.1. Melt loss .......................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.2. Melt reintigration ............................................................................................................ 30 5. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 36 5.1. Limitations of the modelling ................................................................................................. 36 5.2. Melt loss calculations ............................................................................................................ 38 5.2.1. Catastrohpic versus incremental melt loss calculations .................................................. 41 5.2.2. Melt Fertility ................................................................................................................... 43 5.2.3. Structural controls on the style of melt loss .................................................................... 44 5.3. Melt reintegration calculations .............................................................................................. 45 5.4. Implications for metamorphic induced differentiation of crustal heat production ................ 47 6. Conclusions ................................................................................................................. 47 7. Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................... 48 References ....................................................................................................................... 49 Appendix 1: Heat production .......................................................................................... 55 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 57 Gamma Ray Spectrometers ...................................................................................................... 57 4 Kiara Bockmann Melt loss and melt reintegration modelling Results .......................................................................................................................................... 59 Outcrop determination of K-U-Th ............................................................................................ 59 Gamma ray spectrometer data .................................................................................................. 60 K–U–Th distribution and heat production ................................................................................ 66 Representative monazite microprobe analyses ......................................................................... 67 Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 69 KUTh distribution with progressive metamorphism ................................................................ 69 Implications for metamorphic induced differentiation of crustal heat production ....................... 70 Appendix 2: Whole-rock geochemistry .......................................................................... 72 Appendix 3: Representative electron microprobe analyses ............................................ 78 Appendix 4: Melt loss compositions ............................................................................... 82 Appendix 5: Catastrophic melt loss ................................................................................ 83 Appendix 6: Melt fertility ............................................................................................... 84 Appendix 7: Melt reintegration compositions ................................................................ 84 5 Kiara Bockmann Melt loss and melt reintegration modelling LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Figure 1. Geology of the Reynolds Range ........................................................................... 10 Figure 2. Field photographs of the Pine Hill Formation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Facies and Mafic
    Metamorphic Facies and Metamorphosed Mafic Rocks l V.M. Goldschmidt (1911, 1912a), contact Metamorphic Facies and metamorphosed pelitic, calcareous, and Metamorphosed Mafic Rocks psammitic hornfelses in the Oslo region l Relatively simple mineral assemblages Reading: Winter Chapter 25. (< 6 major minerals) in the inner zones of the aureoles around granitoid intrusives l Equilibrium mineral assemblage related to Xbulk Metamorphic Facies Metamorphic Facies l Pentii Eskola (1914, 1915) Orijärvi, S. l Certain mineral pairs (e.g. anorthite + hypersthene) Finland were consistently present in rocks of appropriate l Rocks with K-feldspar + cordierite at Oslo composition, whereas the compositionally contained the compositionally equivalent pair equivalent pair (diopside + andalusite) was not biotite + muscovite at Orijärvi l If two alternative assemblages are X-equivalent, l Eskola: difference must reflect differing we must be able to relate them by a reaction physical conditions l In this case the reaction is simple: l Finnish rocks (more hydrous and lower MgSiO3 + CaAl2Si2O8 = CaMgSi2O6 + Al2SiO5 volume assemblage) equilibrated at lower En An Di Als temperatures and higher pressures than the Norwegian ones Metamorphic Facies Metamorphic Facies Oslo: Ksp + Cord l Eskola (1915) developed the concept of Orijärvi: Bi + Mu metamorphic facies: Reaction: “In any rock or metamorphic formation which has 2 KMg3AlSi 3O10(OH)2 + 6 KAl2AlSi 3O10(OH)2 + 15 SiO2 arrived at a chemical equilibrium through Bt Ms Qtz metamorphism at constant temperature and =
    [Show full text]
  • Streaming of Saline Fluids Through Archean Crust
    Lithos 346–347 (2019) 105157 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Lithos journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/lithos Streaming of saline fluids through Archean crust: Another view of charnockite-granite relations in southern India Robert C. Newton a,⁎, Leonid Ya. Aranovich b, Jacques L.R. Touret c a Dept. of Earth, Planetary and Spaces, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA b Inst. of Ore Deposits, Petrography, Mineralogy and Geochemistry, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow RU-119017, Russia c 121 rue de la Réunion, F-75020 Paris, France article info abstract Article history: The complementary roles of granites and rocks of the granulite facies have long been a key issue in models of the Received 27 June 2019 evolution of the continental crust. “Dehydration melting”,orfluid-absent melting of a lower crust containing H2O Received in revised form 25 July 2019 only in the small amounts present in biotite and amphibole, has raised problems of excessively high tempera- Accepted 26 July 2019 tures and restricted amounts of granite production, factors seemingly incapable of explaining voluminous bodies Available online 29 July 2019 of granite like the Archean Closepet Granite of South India. The existence of incipient granulite-facies metamor- phism (charnockite formation) and closely associated migmatization (melting) in 2.5 Ga-old gneisses in a quarry Keywords: fl Charnockite exposure in southern India and elsewhere, with structural, chemical and mineral-inclusion evidence of uid ac- Granite tion, has encouraged a wetter approach, in consideration of aqueous fluids for rock melting which maintain suf- Saline fluids ficiently low H2O activity for granulite-facies metamorphism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of Formation of the Amphibolite- Granulite Transition
    The Origin of Formation of the Amphibolite- Granulite Transition Facies by Gregory o. Carpenter Advisor: Dr. M. Barton May 28, 1987 Table of Contents Page ABSTRACT . 1 QUESTION OF THE TRANSITION FACIES ORIGIN • . 2 DEFINING THE FACIES INVOLVED • • • • • • • • • • 3 Amphibolite Facies • • • • • • • • • • 3 Granulite Facies • • • • • • • • • • • 5 Amphibolite-Granulite Transition Facies 6 CONDITIONS OF FORMATION FOR THE FACIES INVOLVED • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 8 Amphibolite Facies • • • • • • • • 9 Granulite Facies • • • • • • • • • •• 11 Amphibolite-Granulite Transition Facies •• 13 ACTIVITIES OF C02 AND H20 . • • • • • • 1 7 HYPOTHESES OF FORMATION • • • • • • • • •• 19 Deep Crust Model • • • • • • • • • 20 Orogeny Model • • • • • • • • • • • • • 20 The Earth • • • • • • • • • • • • 20 Plate Tectonics ••••••••••• 21 Orogenic Events ••••••••• 22 Continent-Continent Collision •••• 22 Continent-Ocean Collision • • • • 24 CONCLUSION • . • 24 BIBLIOGRAPHY • • . • • • • 26 List of Illustrations Figure 1. Precambrian shields, platform sediments and Phanerozoic fold mountain belts 2. Metamorphic facies placement 3. Temperature and pressure conditions for metamorphic facies 4. Temperature and pressure conditions for metamorphic facies 5. Transformation processes with depth 6. Temperature versus depth of a descending continental plate 7. Cross-section of the earth 8. Cross-section of the earth 9. Collision zones 10. Convection currents Table 1. Metamorphic facies ABSTRACT The origin of formation of the amphibolite­ granulite transition
    [Show full text]
  • Nature and Origin of Fluids in Granulite Facies Metamorphism R.C
    129 NATURE AND ORIGIN OF FLUIDS IN GRANULITE FACIES METAMORPHISM R.C. Newton, Department of the Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA Orthopyroxene, the definitive mineral of the granulite facies, may originate in prograde dehydration reactions in rock systems open to fluids or may be a premetamorphic relic of igneous intrusions or their contact aureoles which persisted through fluid-deficient metamorphism. Terrains showing evidence of open-system orthopyroxene-forming reactions are those of South India and southern Norway. An example of fluid-deficient granulite facies metamorphism is the Adirondack Highlands of New York, where metamorphic pyroxene commonly resulted from dry recrystallization of pyroxenes of plutonic charnockites and anorthosites. The metamorphism recorded by the presence of orthopyroxene in different terrains may thus have been conservative or may have involved fluids of different origins pervasive on various length-scales. Metamorphism with pervasive metasomatism is signaled by monotonous H20, C02 and 02 fugacities over large areas, nearly independent of lithology, by scarcity of relict textures, and by pronounced depletion of Rb and other large ion lithophile (LILE) elements in the highest grade areas, such as the southernmost part of the Bamble, South Norway, terrain (1). Primary hornblende is rare or absent in quartzofeldspathic gneisses and orthopyroxene is ubiquitous in acid and basic rocks in the charnockitic terrains. Pronounced major and minor element redistributions took place
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Unified Nomenclature in Metamorphic Petrology
    8. Amphibolite and Granulite Recommendations by the IUGS Subcommission on the Systematics of Metamorphic Rocks: Web version 01.02.07 1José Coutinho, 2Hans Kräutner, 3Francesco Sassi, 4Rolf Schmid and 5Sisir Sen. 1 J. Coutinho, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil 2 L M University, Munich, Germany 3 F. Sassi, Department of Mineralogy and Petrography, University of Padova, Italy 4 R. Schmid, ETH-Centre, Zürich, Switzerland 5 S. Sen, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India Introduction This paper summarises the results of the discussions by the SCMR, and the response to circulars distributed by the SCMR, which demonstrated the highly variable usage of the terms granulite and amphibolite. It presents those definitions which currently seem to be the most appropriate ones. Some notes are included in order to explain the reasoning behind the suggested definitions. In considering the definitions it is important to remember that some of them are a compromise of highly different, even conflicting, opinions and traditions. The names amphibolite and granulite have been used in geological literature for nearly 200 years: amphibolite since Brongniart (1813), granulite since Weiss (1803). Although Brongniart described amphibolite as a rock composed of amphibole and plagioclase, in those early days the meaning of the term was variable. Only later (e.g. Rosenbusch, 1898) was it fixed as metamorphic rock consisting of hornblende and plagioclase, and of medium to high metamorphic grade. In contrast, the use of the name granulite was highly variable, a position which was further complicated by the introduction of the facies principle (Eskola, 1920, 1952) when the name granulite was proposed for all rocks of the granulite facies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Granulite-Granite Linkage: Inferences Froll} S
    the Granulite-Granite Linkage: Inferences froll} s lDEPARTAMENTO DE PETROLOGIA Y GEOQUIMICA, FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS GEOLOGICAS, UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE, 28040 MADRID, SPAIN 2 DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY, BIRKBECK COLLEGE, MALIT STREET, LONDON WCIE 7HX, UK 3CNRS UMR 6524, D EPARTEMENT DES SCIENCES DE LA TERRE, UNIVERSITE BLAISE PASCAL, 5 RUE KESSLER, F-63038 CLERMONT-FERRAND, FRANCE 4DEPARTAMENTO DE GEOLOGIA, FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS DEL MAR, UNIVERSIDAD DE CADIZ, 1151O PUERTO REAL ''-'""JJHC,J. SPAIN if the xenoliths is lower than that outcropping mid-crustal A contribution the granites reduces the mantle contribution in models ifgranite nature if the lower continental crust in contrasts with the more mqficffJ7f!r:r-,Cf1LUflf con7iJo:ntum and estimaud in other European Herrynian areas) a non- Thermobarometric calculations based on min- crust in this Herrynian eral paragenesis indicate conditions around 850-950°(;, 7-11 th us the xenoliths lower con- this high-T high-P assemi'JLCl!.'!e IS a by Ket;vpftlUC coronas) trf111.'in(J'rt in the KEY WORDS: filsi;; lower continental crust; Sr-Nd .L.LO,'OYJ<,"-M& Iberian Belt alkaline magma. Felsic mela1!!J'leOlIS exhibit restitic mineral with up to 50% 37% sillimanite. Major and trace element mO,rJelLWP idea that the taU�-l1erc�vnuzn {J19JaLumlnollS INTRODUCTION The study of lower-crustal xenoliths has been a 8 Nd calculaud at an (J1)erage Herrynian age tool in understanding the process of anatexis involved in if300 Ma) are in the range O' 706-0' 712) and -1,4 to -8'2, the genesis of felsic (Downes & Duthou, These values match the isowpic if the Ruiz et Miller et 1992; Hanchar et outcrobtnnp late TIe Sr 1994; Pankhurst & Rapela, It is clear that granite sources in orogenic areas are not the outcropping An alkaline ultrabasic dyke swarm was intruded into metamorphic rocks but are located in deeper crustal the region in Mesozoic times (Villaseca & Nuez, levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Eclogite Resembling Metamorphic Disequilibrium Assemblage Formed Through Fuid‑Induced Metasomatic Reactions Sanghoon Kwon1, Vinod O
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Eclogite resembling metamorphic disequilibrium assemblage formed through fuid‑induced metasomatic reactions Sanghoon Kwon1, Vinod O. Samuel1*, Yungoo Song1, Sung Won Kim2, Seung‑Ik Park3, Yirang Jang4 & M. Santosh5,6 Equilibrium omphacite‑garnet‑bearing mafc rocks have been classifed as eclogites, either pristine or retrogressed, that were formed at great depths in the lithosphere. Here we report a unique natural example of eclogite resembling assemblage in disequilibrium formed through fuid‑induced metasomatic reactions under the amphibolite to granulite facies. Primarily, the amphibolized protolith experienced a garnet‑amphibolite facies metamorphism at ~ 500–700 °C and ~ 0.8–1 GPa. Subsequently, CO2 fuid induced fracturing and dissolution‑reprecipitation reactions occurred at peak metamorphic conditions of ~ 700 °C and ~ 1 GPa. Occasional omphacite‑albite assemblage, which gradually replace diopside‑oligoclase symplectite adjacent to albite veins along fractures, indicates fuid‑induced coupled dissolution‑reprecipitation disequilibrium reactions. Here the albite‑omphacite assemblage is in local equilibrium at least on 1 mm length scale, during cooling, below ~ 600 ºC and ~ 1 GPa, within the amphibolite facies conditions. The results from this study clearly suggest that disequilibrium garnet‑omphacite assemblage in mafc rocks could be formed by crustal reworking processes below granulite facies conditions, and their textural equilibrium is an important criterion while defning eclogite facies. Eclogite facies metamorphic rocks formed through subduction and collision processes are common in global orogenic belts1–12 (e.g., Usagaran belt 1, Belomorian Belt2, Trans-Hudson orogen3, Grenvillian-Caledonian belt 4,5 Qinling–Dabie–Sulu belt6, Appalachian Orogenic Belt 7, Central Asian Orogenic Belt 8, Sambagawa belt 9, Alpine- Himalayan belt10,11, Franciscan complex12 etc.) created throughout Earth’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greenschist to Amphibolite Facies Tonalite-Greenstone Terrain of The
    95 THE PIKWITONEI GRANULITE DOMAIN: A LOWER CRUSTAL LEVEL ALONG THE CHURCHILL-SUPERIOR BOUNDARY IN CENTRAL MANITOBA. W. Weber, Manitoba Geological Services Branch, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3H OW4 The greenschist to amphibolite facies tonalite-greenstone terrain of the Gods Lake subprovince grades - in a northwesterly direction - into the granulite facies Pikwitonei domain (1) at the western margins of the Superior Province,. The transition is the result of prograde metamorphism and takes place over 50 - 100 km without any structural or lithological breaks. Locally the orthopyroxene isograd is oblique to the structural grain and transects greenstone belts, e.g., the Cross Lake belt (2). The greenstone belts in the granulite facies and adjacent lower grade domain consist mainly of mafic and (minor) ultramafic metavolcanics, and clastic and chemical metasedimentary rocks (1,2). Typical for the greenstone belts crossed by the orthopyroxene isograd are anorthositic gabbros and anorthosites, and plagiophyric mafic flows. Available data suggest a late Aphebian age for the prograde greenschist to granulite facies metamorphism. Peak conditions are reflected by saphirin-bearing and opx-sillimanite quartz gneisses which indicate 10 - 11 kb pressure and temperatures of 900 - 1000°C (2). At its western and northern edge - towards the contact with the Churchill Province - the rocks of the Pikwitonei granulite domain were overprinted by the Hudsonian orogeny; they were deformed, selectively retrogressed and recrystallized under greenschist to amphibolite facies conditions (1,2); locally they were migmatized. The Thompson belt, the Split Lake block and a linear zone south of the Fox River consists of these reworked granulites. Proterozoic rocks of the Circum-Superior belt (3) (apparently) overlie the reworked granulites along the Fox River and in the Thompson belt.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Water in the Formation of Granulite and Amphibolite Facies Rocks Tobacco Root Mountains Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1988 Role of water in the formation of granulite and amphibolite facies rocks Tobacco Root Mountains Montana Linda M. Angeloni The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Angeloni, Linda M., "Role of water in the formation of granulite and amphibolite facies rocks Tobacco Root Mountains Montana" (1988). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 8115. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/8115 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COPYRIGHT ACT OF 1976 Th is is an unpublished manuscript in which copyright SUBSISTS. Any further r e p r in t in g of its contents must be APPROVED BY THE AUTHOR. Ma n s f ie l d Library Un iv e r s it y of Montana Date : t , 9 C B_ THE ROLE OF WATER IN THE FORMATION OF GRANULITE AND AMPHIBOLITE FACIES ROCKS, TOBACCO ROOT MOUNTAINS, MONTANA By Linda Marie Angeloni B.S., University of California, Santa Cruz, 1982 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science University of Montana 1988 Approved by Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School Date UMI Number: EP38916 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Proterozoic Deformation in the Northwest of the Archean Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia Catherine V
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Precambrian Research 162 (2008) 354–384 Proterozoic deformation in the northwest of the Archean Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia Catherine V. Spaggiari a,∗, Jo-Anne Wartho b,1, Simon A. Wilde b a Geological Survey of Western Australia, Department of Industry and Resources, 100 Plain Street, East Perth, Western Australia 6004, Australia b Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845, Australia Received 31 January 2007; received in revised form 19 September 2007; accepted 16 October 2007 Abstract The Narryer Terrane within the northwestern Yilgarn Craton contains the oldest crust in Australia. The Jack Hills greenstone belt is located within the southern part of the Narryer Terrane, and structures cutting it and surrounding rocks have been dated using the 40Ar/39Ar technique. The results show that east-trending, dextral, transpressive shearing was related to the 1830–1780 Ma Capricorn Orogeny, followed by further deformation and/or cooling between c. 1760 and 1740 Ma. These results confirm that major deformation has affected the northwestern part of the Yilgarn Craton in an intracratonic setting during the Proterozoic. Proterozoic structures have been interpreted to extend south beyond the Narryer Terrane into the northern part of the Youanmi Terrane (Murchison Domain), and include the Yalgar Fault, previously interpreted as the boundary between the Narryer and Youanmi Terranes. Terrane amalgamation pre-dated the emplacement of c. 2660 Ma granites in both terranes, and the current expression of the Yalgar Fault must represent a younger, reworked, post-amalgamation structure, possibly controlled by the tectonic boundary. However, new aeromagnetic and gravity imagery does not show the eastern part of the Yalgar Fault as a major structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Explanatory Notes for the Time–Space Diagram and Stratotectonic Elements Map of Tasmania
    Tasmanian Geological Survey TASMANIA DEVELOPMENT Record 1995/01 AND RESOURCES Tasgo NGMA Project Sub-Project 1: Geological Synthesis Explanatory notes for the Time–Space Diagram and Stratotectonic Elements Map of Tasmania by D. B. Seymour and C. R. Calver Tasmanian Geological Survey Record 1995/01 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 4 KING ISLAND.......................................................................................................................... 5 ?Mesoproterozoic ............................................................................................................... 5 Neoproterozoic orogenesis and granitoid intrusive rocks ................................................ 5 ?Neoproterozoic sequences ................................................................................................ 5 Early Carboniferous granitoid intrusive rocks ................................................................ 6 ROCKY CAPE ELEMENT....................................................................................................... 7 ?Mesoproterozoic: Rocky Cape Group ............................................................................... 7 Burnie and Oonah Formations ........................................................................................ 7 Smithton Synclinorium .................................................................................................... 7 Ahrberg Group .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Petrogenesis of Eclogite and Mafic Granulite Xenoliths from South
    Petrogenesis of eclogite and mafic granulite xenoliths from South Australian Jurassic kimberlitic intrusions: Tectonic Implications Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Adelaide for an Honours Degree in Geology Angus Tod November 2012 1 PETROGENESIS OF GITE ECLO AND MAFIC GRANULITE XENOLITHS FROM SOUTH AUSTRALIAN JURASSIC KIMBERLITIC TRUSIONS: IN TECTONIC IMPLICATIONS ANGASTON, EL ALAMEIN AND PITCAIRN ECLOGITES AND MAFIC TES GRANULI ABSTRACT Jurassic kimberlites in South Australia have entrained sub lithospheric mafic granulites and eclogites from the eastern margin of the Australian Craton. This thesis looks at these rocks as a unique window into the sub-lithospheric mantle beneath the south eastern margin of Gondwana. Samples collected from Angaston, El Alamein and Pitcairn included eclogites, amphibole eclogites, amphibole granulites and feldspar rich granulites. These samples were prepared for analytical work at the University of Adelaide. Whole rock geochemistry was collected from x-ray fluorescence in the Mawson Laboratories. Mineral identification and geochemistry was determined by the Cameca SX 51 microprobe at Adelaide Microscopy. Geothermobarometry showed pressures between 6-30kbar, which represent 15-90km of depth and temperatures between 620-1200oC. These rocks experience very high pressure and temperatures and show petrological evidence of isobaric cooling path from the adiabat to the stable geotherm. Magma crystallisation models using MELTS program helped to determine the protoliths that appear to represent mafic underplates. The cumulate and melts that make up these xenoliths have been shown in this thesis to most likely have been derived from a MORB source that crystallised at high pressures (up to 30kbar). Pseudosections produced with the Theriak-Domino program were used to produce a metamorphic path and show that rock type is closely linked to emplacement depth and bulk composition.
    [Show full text]