Freedom Under the Law

THE HAMLYN LECTURES First Series FREEDOM UNDER THE LAW Sir Alfred Denning STEVENS THE HAMLYN LECTURES FIRST SERIES FREEDOM UNDER THE LAW AUSTRALIA The Law Book Company Ltd. Sydney : Melbourne : Brisbane CANADA AND U.S.A. The Carswell Company Ltd. Toronto INDIA N. M. Tripathi Private Ltd. Bombay ISRAEL Steimatzky's Agency Ltd. Jerusalem : Tel Aviv : Haifa NEW ZEALAND Sweet & Maxwell (N.Z.) Ltd. Wellington PAKISTAN Pakistan Law House Karachi FREEDOM UNDER THE LAW BY THE RIGHT HONOURABLE SIR ALFRED DENNING One of the Lords Justices of His Majesty's Court of Appeal in England LONDON STEVENS & SONS LIMITED 1949 First Edition 1949 Second Impression - - - 1949 Third Impression - - - - 1950 Fourth Impression- - - - 1950 Fifth Impression - - - - 1952 Sixth Impression (reset) - - 1954 Seventh Impression - - - 1962 Eighth Impression - - - - 1968 Ninth Impression - 1971 Tenth Impression - - - 1974 Eleventh Impression - - - 1977 Twelfth Impression - - - 1979 Thirteenth Impression - - - 1986 Published by Stevens & Sons Limited of 11 New Fetter Lane in the City of London and printed by Page Bros (Norwich) Ltd ISBN 0 420 42140 8. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in any retrieval system of any nature, without the written permission of the copyright holder and the publisher, application for which shall be made to the publisher. Sir Alfred Denning CONTENTS The Hamljn Trust .... page vi 1. PERSONAL FREFDOM I 2. FREEDOM OF MIND AND CONSCIENCE . 3$ i. JUSTICE BETWEEN MAN AND THE STATE . 67 4. THE POWERS OF THE EXECUTIVE . 99 THE HAMLYN TRUST HE Hamlyn Trust came into existence under the will of the late Miss Emma Warburton Hamlyn Tof Torquay, who died in 1941 aged 80. She came of an old and well-known Devon family. Her father, William Russell Hamlyn, practised in Torquay as a solicitor for many years. She was a woman of dominant character, intelligent and cultured, well versed in literature, music, and art, and a "lover of her country. She inherited a taste for law, and studied the subject. She travelled frequently on the Continent and about the Mediterranean and gathered impressions of comparative jurisprudence and ethnology. Miss Hamlyn bequeathed the residue of her estate in terms which were thought vague. The matter was taken to the Chancery division of the High Court, which on November 29, 1948, approved a Scheme for the administration of the Trust. Paragraph 3 of the Scheme is as follows :— ' The object of this charity is the furtherance by lectures or otherwise among the Common People of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of the knowledge of the Comparative Jurisprudence and the Ethnology of the Chief European Countries, including the United Kingdom, and the circumstances of the growth of such Jurisprudence to the intent that the Common People of the United Kingdom may vii viii The Hamlvn Trust realise the privileges which in law and custom they enjoy in comparison with other European Peoples and realising and appreciating such privileges may recognise the responsibilities and obligations attaching to them.' The Trustees under the Scheme number nine, viz. : (a) Sir EDMUND BALL, ^ Executors of Mr. S. K. COLERIDGE, J>Miss Hamlyn's Mr. J. R. WARBURTONJ Will. (b) Representatives of the Universities of London, Wales, Leeds, Glasgow and Belfast, viz : Professor G. W. KEETON, Professor D. L. Li.. DAVIES, Professor B. A. WORTLEY, Professor D. S. MACLAGAN, and Belfast, vacant. (c) The Principal of the University College of the South-West, ex-officio. The Trustees decided to organise courses of lectures of high interest and quality by persons of eminence under the auspices of co-operating Universities with a view to the lectures being made available in book form to a wide public. This first series of four lectures was given by the Rt. Hon. Lord Justice Denning in the Senate House, London University, in October and November, 1949. JOHN MURRAY, November, 1949. Chairman of the Trustees. PERSONAL FREEDOM PERSONAL FREEDOM HOPE you have not come expecting a scholarly discourse replete with copious references. If I you have, I fear you will be disappointed : for, I have come as the Hamlyn Trust bids me, to speak, as it were, to the common people of England and to further amongst them the knowledge of their laws, so that they may realise their privileges and likewise their responsibilities. So if I refer to matters which you know full well, I hope you will forgive me. Not that it is any discredit to any of us to be one of the common people of England. It is indeed the greatest privilege that any man can have : for the common people of England have succeeded to the greatest heritage of all—the heritage of freedom : and it is that which I have come to talk about—freedom under the law. Let me start with an instance of how the courts approach the subject. Whenever one of the King's judges takes his seat, there is one application which by long tradition has priority over all others. Counsel has but to say ' My Lord, I have an application which concerns the liberty of the subject ' and forthwith the judge will put all other matters aside and hear it. It may be an application for a writ of habeas corpus, or an application for bail, but, whatever form it takes, it is heard first. This is of course only a matter of 4 Freedom under the Law procedure, but the English law respecting the freedom of the individual has been built up from the procedure of the courts : and this simple instance of priority in point of time contains within it the fundamental principle that, where there is any conflict between the freedom of the individual and any other rights or interests, then no matter how great or powerful those others may be, the freedom of the humblest citizen shall prevail over it. These are fine sentiments which you will find expressed in the laws of other countries too ; but rights are no good unless you can enforce them ; and it is in their enforcement that English law has shown its peculiar genius. The task is one of getting the right balance. The freedom of the individual, which is so dear to us, has to be balanced with his duty; for, to be sure every one owes a duty to the society of which he forms part. The balance has changed remarkably during the last ioo years. Previously the freedom of the individual carried with it a freedom to acquire and use his property as he wished, a freedom to contract and so forth: but these freedoms were so much abused that in our time they have been counterbalanced by the duty to use one's property and powers for the good of society as a whole. In some foreign countries this duty has been carried to such a pitch that freedom, as we know it, no longer exists. If the people of those countries choose to put up with such a system that is their affair. All that needs to be said about it is that it is not the English view of human society. What matters in England is that each man should be free Personal Freedom j to develop his own personality to the full: and the only duties which should restrict this freedom are those which are necessary to enable everyone else to do the same. Whenever these interests are nicely balanced, the scale goes down on the side of freedom. In these lectures I hope to show how the English law has kept in the past the balance between individual freedom and social duty : and how it should keep the balance in the social revolution of today, drawing on the experience and laws of other European countries for the lessons we can learn from them. PERSONAL FREEDOM Let me first define my terms. By personal freedom I mean the freedom of every law-abiding citizen \o think what he will, to say what he will, and to go where he will on his lawful occasions without let or hindrance from any other persons. Despite all the great changes that have come about in the other freedoms, this freedom has in our country remained intact. It must be matched, of course, with social security, by which I mean the peace and good order of the community in which we live. The freedom of the just man is worth little to him if he can be preyed upon by the murderer or thief. Every society must have the means to protect itself from marauders. It must have powers to arrest, to search, and to imprison those who break the laws. So long as those powers are properly exercised, they are themselves the safeguards of freedom. But powers may be abused, and, if those powers are abused, there 6 Freedom under the Law is no tyranny like them. It leads to a state of affairs when the police may arrest any man and throw him into prison without cause assigned. It leads to the search of his home and belongings on the slightest pretext—or on none. It leads to the hated gestapo and the police State. It leads to extorted confessions and to trials which are a mockery of justice. The moral of it all is that a true balance must be kept between personal freedom on the one hand and social security on the other. It has been done here, and is being done. But how ? HABEAS CORPUS In the first place the law says that no man is to be imprisoned except by judgment of the King's Courts or whilst awaiting trial by them.

Load more