DOCSLIB.ORG

Freedom in the World 1988-1989 Complete Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Freedom in the World 1988-1989 Complete Book Freedom in the World Freedom in the World Political Rights and Civil Liberties 1988-1989 Raymond D. Gastil With contributions by Stephen Earl Bennett Richard Jensen Paul Kleppner FREEDOM HOUSE Copyright © 1989 by Freedom House Printed in the United States of America. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For permission, write to Freedom House, 48 East 21st Street, New York, N.Y. 10010. The Library of Congress has cataloged this serial title as follows: Freedom in the world / Raymond D. Gastil.—1978- — New York : Freedom House, 1978- v. : map ; 25 cm.-(Freedom House Book) Annual. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISSN 0732-6610=Freedom in the world. 1. Civil rights—Periodicals. I. Gastil, Raymond D. II. Series. JC571.F66 323.4'05-dc 19 82-642048 AACR 2 MARC-S Library of Congress [8410] ISBN 0-932088-32-5 (pbk.: alk. paper) ISBN 0-932088-33-3 (alk. paper) Distributed by arrangement with University Press of America, Inc. 4720 Boston Way Lanham, MD 20706 3 Henrietta Street London WC2E 8LU England CONTENTS Tables vii Preface ix PART I. THE SURVEY IN 1988 Freedom in the Comparative Survey: 3 Definitions and Criteria Survey Ratings and Tables for 1988 31 PART II. POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN AMERICA: A Report of a Freedom House Conference Introductory Note 89 Opening Remarks 90 Who Has Been Eligible to Vote? 93 An Historical Review of Suffrage Requirements in the U.S. Paul Kleppner Discussion after Professor Kleppner's Paper 129 Party Systems and Democracy: 153 The American Experience Richard Jensen Contents Discussion after Professor Jensen's Paper 165 The Withered Roots: 187 The Impact of Declining Turnout on Democracy in America Stephen Earl Bennett Discussion after Professor Bennett's Paper 227 Discussion of Comparative Participation 243 Discussion of Actions That Might Increase Voting 259 Discussion of Participation in Government Service 279 Conclusionary Discussion of General Issues 305 PART III. COUNTRY SUMMARIES Introduction 337 Summaries 342 PART IV. RELATED TERRITORY SUMMARIES Summaries 491 INDEX 513 vi TABLES 1. Checklist for Political Rights 9 2. Checklist for Civil Liberties 17 3. Independent States: Comparative Freedoms 32 4. Related Territories: Comparative Freedoms 41 5. Countries by Freedom Ratings 45 6. Country Ratings since 1972 50 7. National Elections and Referendums 64 8. Political-Economic Systems 70 9. Social and Economic Comparisons 74 10. Human Suffering, Women's Equality, and Freedom 79 11. The Six Party System 155 12. The Times of Trouble 155 13. Dominant Party's Issues 156 14. Multiple Discriminant Analyses of Validated Vote, 200 1964 and 1984 15. Trends in American Political Participation, 208 1967-1987 PREFACE The Comparative Survey of Freedom was created in 1972 to provide an additional perspective on world events. It was felt that interpre- tations of international events in terms of the critical geopolitical struggle between "East" and "West" too often obscured those finer distinctions between societies that lay along the continuum between absolute repression and full freedom, regardless of the power blocs to which these societies might belong. Unavoidably, the Survey has recently come to be seen as a monitor of the movement toward more democratic systems evident in so much of the world. This yearbook marks the seventeenth year of the Comparative Survey and the eleventh edition in this series of annual publications. Previous yearbooks, in addition to focusing on the Comparative Survey, have emphasized different aspects of freedom and human rights. The first yearbook, the 1978 edition, examined basic theoret- ical issues of freedom and democracy and assessed the record of the Year of Human Rights. The second yearbook reported extensively on a conference devoted to the possibilities of expanding freedom in the Soviet Union. The 1980 yearbook considered international issues in press freedom, aspects of trade union freedom, the struggle for democracy in Iran, elections in Zimbabwe, and the relationship between human rights policy and morality. The 1981 yearbook con- tained essays and discussions from a Freedom House conference on the prospects for freedom in Muslim Central Asia. The 1982 yearbook emphasized a variety of approaches to eco- nomic freedom and its relation to political and civil freedom. The 1983-84 yearbook addressed the problems of corporatism, and the health of democracy in the third world. It also incorporated the papers and discussions of a conference held at Freedom House on supporting democracy in mainland China and Taiwan. We returned in the 1984-85 yearbook to the themes of the definition of freedom and the conditions for the development of freedom that were first addressed in the 1978 yearbook. It also looked at the particular problem of developing democracy in Central America. The 1985-86 yearbook considered America's role in the worldwide struggle for Preface democracy, and reported the results of a conference on supporting liberalization in Eastern Europe. The 1986-87 yearbook offered a number of essays on the nature and value of liberal democracy, as well as comparative discussions of democracy in several countries. These discussions should be seen as a supplement to the theoretical essays in the 1978 yearbook. Last year we brought to our readers' attention something of the variety and scope of work of researchers outside Freedom House that is closely related to the Survey or its themes. These included other surveys of political and civil rights, attempts to find the relationship between development and Survey ratings, and a discussion of factors in democratic development. A major change this year in the Comparative Survey is the drop- ping of the "free, partly free, not free" status of freedom ratings, replacing these with a simple summation of the political and civil rights ratings, labeled the "freedom rating". The director of the survey felt that too much emphasis had come to be placed on wheth- er a country fell on one or the other side of the rather artificial lines between these three over-general statuses. The new system should allow readers or analysts to more flexibly group countries for different purposes. This year the ratings and tables produced by the Survey are augmented by an additional table of social comparisons, one empha- sizing the relative position of women. The discussion of criteria and definitions at the beginning of the 1988-89 yearbook now includes the checklists for political rights and civil liberties separately. The reader should also note some revamping of Table 6, the historical record of the Survey. This year, for the first time, the Survey focuses on an aspect of political rights in the United States. The 1988-89 yearbook reports in full a small discussion held at Freedom House during the year on the continuing and deepening problem of political participation in the United States. Held just before the November 1988 elections, this material should provide useful background, and we hope a basis for action, for all those concerned about the low participation rates of the American voter that were once again emphasized in that election. We acknowledge, more than ever, the contribution made by the advisory panel for the Comparative Survey. The panel consists of: Robert J. Alexander, Richard W. Cottam, Herbert J. Ellison, Sey- mour Martin Lipset, Lucian W. Pye, Robert Scalapino, and Paul Seabury. We also express our appreciation to those foundations x Preface whose grants have made the Survey and the publication of this year- book possible. Substantial support has again been given by the Pew Charitable Trust; their continuing confidence has been a key factor in achieving the Survey's goal of raising the level of understanding of freedom in the world. All Freedom House activities are also assist- ed by the generous support of individual members of the organiza- tion as well as trade unions, corporations, and public foundations that contribute to our general budget. No financial support from any government—now or in the past—has been either solicited or accepted. We gratefully acknowledge the research and editorial assistance of Jeannette C. Gastil in producing this yearbook. xi PARTI The Survey in 1988 FREEDOM IN THE COMPARATIVE SURVEY: DEFINITIONS AND CRITERIA Understanding freedom is not a simple task. To attempt to under- stand its many meanings would carry us far beyond the discussion of political systems with which the Comparative Survey of Freedom has been principally concerned. Yet in common parlance the mean- ings of freedom infect one another, so that a "free society" may be taken to be a society with no rules at all, or a free man may be taken to be an individual with no obligations to society, or even another individual. This global sense of individual freedom leads many Americans to scoff at the idea that theirs is a free society. Not primarily concerned with politics, most Americans apply the word "free" to their personal relationships, sensing correctly, but for our purposes irrelevantly, the necessity to work at a job, or to drive at a certain speed on the highway. To these individuals, "freedom" sounds like a wonderful goal, but hardly a goal that their society has achieved. Yet freedom, when addressed in a narrow political sense, is the basic value, goal, and, to a remarkable degree, attainment of successful democratic regimes. Freedom as independence is important to the Survey, but this too is not a primary basis of judgment. When the primary issue for so many countries in the colonial era was to become free from a colonial or occupying power, "freedom" meant that a country had emerged from control by another state, much as the United States had achieved freedom in the 1780s.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS RODS 2 REELS 32 ACCESSORIES 39 www.shakespeare-fishing.eu SHAKESPEARE K2 Supreme RODS The Ultimate casting blanks for the Tournament Competitor or the Optimum Distance Caster. Fitted with Fuji Reel seat, Fuji Alconite K Guides and reinforced Push in Joints K2 Black Extreme Twin Tip these rods have proved to be simply the best for the most demanding of beach and shore anglers. Unrivalled Casting Machines with twin tip options for long distance casting. The carbon / glass composite tip helps to provide ultra sensitive bite detection whilst the full carbon hard tip is best for maximising distance. Carbon SIC Guides 3+1 Carbon Fuji Alconite K 3 1381018 043388257994 K2 BLACK EXTREME TWIN TIP 4.20M 4,20 m 1,47 m Fast 540 g 1 J15933 239.00 € 1381019 043388258007 K2 BLACK EXTREME TWIN TIP 4.50M 4,50 m 1,57 m Fast 564 g 1 C17267 259.00 € 1381015 043388257963 K2 TEAM SUPREME 14 4,20 m 1,48 m Fast 629 g 1 G19933 299.00 € 1381020 043388258014 K2 BLACK EXTREME TWIN TIP 5.00M 4,80 m 1,67 m Fast 602 g 1 O18600 279.00 € 1381016 043388257970 K2 TEAM SUPREME 15 4,50 m 1,57 m Fast 672 g 1 M21267 319.00 € K2 Extreme Gold 1381017 043388257987 K2 TEAM SUPREME 16 4,80 m 1,68 m Fast 705 g 1 T22600 339.00 € These rods utilize a hi-tech manufacturing process that incorporates high modulus carbon blanks with a Titanium X-Wrap providing exceptional power casting rods.
    [Show full text]
  • La Guerra Por La Mente Pública Moldeando La Mente Pública
    La guerra por la mente pública Moldeando la mente pública NUÑO RODRÍGUEZ, POLITÓLOGO Y AnaLISTA l surgimiento de la sociedad de masas supuso un punto de giro en la narra- tiva de la historia. La necesidad de reconducir a la población por los nuevos parámetros fijados por las elites, supuso un punto de inflexión en la manera Ede gobernar. En el mundo moderno fue Napoleón el primero en usar abiertamente la propaganda para sus fines políticos, para ello creó la oficina de la opinión -pú blica. Napoleón veía la opinión pública como algo mecánico y manipulable a tra- vés de la psicología.1 De hecho, Napoleón pensaba que solo habían dos fuerzas en el mundo: la espada y el espíritu. Veía que a lo largo de la historia la espada siempre ha sido derrotada por el espíritu,2 y por ello pensaba que la fuerza de un estado residía en la opinión pública que la población tenía del propio estado. Na- poleón resumió su creencia en el poder de la opinión pública cuando dijo “tres periódicos hostiles son más temibles que mil bayonetas”.3 El beneplácito de la población era indispensable para la práctica de gobierno. Por este motivo el surgi- miento de las masas y su irrupción en los asuntos políticos es una de las razones 4 REVISTA FUERZA AÉREA-EUA TERCERA EDICIÓN La guerra por la mente pública principales por las que el estado moderno necesita de la propaganda.4 En la sociedad de masas la población conoce a sus líderes a través del sistema mediático y en el sistema mediático es más complejo ejercer una recia censura, como se podía ejercer en tiempos anteriores.
    [Show full text]
  • NCIS Bulletin Summer 2010
    Director Special Agent Mark D. Clookie Featured Stories: Assistant Director for Communications Mark Clookie Selected as New Director.........Page 2 William Klein Interview with Director Mark D. Clookie.......Page 3 Deputy Director for Communications Paul T. O’Donnell Counter-piracy Operations.............................Page 7 Editor of Bulletin FLETC Charleston: Advanced Training.....Page 11 Sara P. Johnson New Facilities Around the Organization......Page 12 Design and Layout of Bulletin Janet D. Reynolds New Headquarters Building..........................Page 14 There is a need for enhancing communications DONCAF Move to Ft Meade........................Page 15 between Headquarters and the field elements of the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS). We Cyber Conflict - Report from Estonia...........Page 16 satisfy this need and increase our effectiveness in serving the Department of the Navy by selectively Relief Operations in Haiti.............................Page 18 publishing information of interest to members of NCIS. The Bulletin is intended for use by all IG Inspections................................................Page 20 members of NCIS. Deputies Scovel & Blincoe Retire.................Page 22 The Bulletin is your tool for exchanging information, and your input is essential. Please feel free to contact “NCIS” Actors Visit Headquarters...............Page 24 me at: (202) 433-7113 or (202) 433-0904 (fax) or [email protected]. Ladies and Gentlemen of NCIS, It has been over four months since Secretary of the Navy Mabus swore me in as your new director. I am humbled by his selection of and confidence in me and incredibly grateful for the warm outpouring of support that I’ve received from all of you. Thank you! From my new “vantage point,” I am even more impressed by the breadth and depth of what you do and how you carry out our mission.
    [Show full text]
  • Walter Lippmann and the Fallacy of Data Privacy Self-Management
    Original Research Article Big Data & Society July–December 2015: 1–15 ! The Author(s) 2015 Big Data and The Phantom Public: Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Walter Lippmann and the fallacy DOI: 10.1177/2053951715608876 of data privacy self-management bds.sagepub.com Jonathan Obar Abstract In 1927, Walter Lippmann published The Phantom Public, denouncing what he refers to as the ‘mystical fallacy of dem­ ocracy.’ Decrying romantic democratic models that privilege self-governance, he writes: ‘‘I have not happened to meet anybody, from a President of the United States to a professor of political science, who came anywhere near to embody­ 2 ing the accepted ideal of the sovereign and omnicompetent citizen’’. Almost 90-years later, Lippmann’s pragmatism is as relevant as ever, and should be applied in new contexts where similar self-governance concerns persist. This paper does just that, repurposing Lippmann’s argument in the context of the ongoing debate over the role of the digital citizen in Big Data management. It is argued that recent proposals by the Federal Trade Commission, the White House and the US Congress, championing notice and choice privacy policy, perpetuate a self-governance fallacy comparable to Lippmann’s, referred to here as the fallacy of data privacy self-management. Even if the digital citizen had the faculties and the system for data privacy self-management, the digital citizen has little time for data governance. What we desire is the freedom to pursue the ends of digital production, without being inhibited by the means. The average digital citizen wants privacy, and safety, but cannot complete all that is required for its protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Political History of Nevada: Chapter 1
    Political History of Nevada Chapter 1 Politics in Nevada, Circa 2016 37 CHAPTER 1: POLITICS IN NEVADA, CIRCA 2016 Nevada: A Brief Historiography By EMERSON MARCUS in Nevada Politics State Historian, Nevada National Guard Th e Political History of Nevada is the quintessential reference book of Nevada elections and past public servants of this State. Journalists, authors, politicians, and historians have used this offi cial reference for a variety of questions. In 1910, the Nevada Secretary of State’s Offi ce fi rst compiled the data. Th e Offi ce updated the data 30 years later in 1940 “to meet a very defi nite and increasing interest in the political history of Nevada,” and has periodically updated it since. Th is is the fi rst edition following the Silver State’s sesquicentennial, and the State’s yearlong celebration of 150 years of Statehood in 2014. But this brief article will look to examine something other than political data. It’s more about the body of historical work concerning the subject of Nevada’s political history—a brief historiography. A short list of its contributors includes Dan De Quille and Mark Twain; Sam Davis and James Scrugham; Jeanne Wier and Anne Martin; Richard Lillard and Gilman Ostrander; Mary Ellen Glass and Effi e Mona Mack; Russell Elliott and James Hulse; William Rowley and Michael Green. Th eir works standout as essential secondary sources of Nevada history. For instance, Twain’s Roughing It (1872), De Quille’s Big Bonanza (1876) and Eliot Lord’s Comstock Mining & Mines (1883) off er an in-depth and anecdote-rich— whether fact or fi ction—glance into early Nevada and its mining camp way of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002
    Description of document: Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Case Log October 2000 - April 2002 Requested date: 2002 Release date: 2003 Posted date: 08-February-2021 Source of document: Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intelligence Agency Washington, DC 20505 Fax: 703-613-3007 Filing a FOIA Records Request Online The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. 1 O ct 2000_30 April 2002 Creation Date Requester Last Name Case Subject 36802.28679 STRANEY TECHNOLOGICAL GROWTH OF INDIA; HONG KONG; CHINA AND WTO 36802.2992 CRAWFORD EIGHT DIFFERENT REQUESTS FOR REPORTS REGARDING CIA EMPLOYEES OR AGENTS 36802.43927 MONTAN EDWARD GRADY PARTIN 36802.44378 TAVAKOLI-NOURI STEPHEN FLACK GUNTHER 36810.54721 BISHOP SCIENCE OF IDENTITY FOUNDATION 36810.55028 KHEMANEY TI LEAF PRODUCTIONS, LTD.
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Election and Initial Impact of FDR Kiana Frederick Leading up to the Election of 1932
    The Road to Election and Initial Impact of FDR Kiana Frederick Leading Up to the Election of 1932 ● FDR’s main campaign strategy was to focus the public’s attention on Hoover’s inadequacies and the Nation’s troubles. ● His strategy allowed for him to put down Hoover while promising better days ahead if he was president. ● This promise was NOT backed up with any specific policies or programs that he would change or create. Lead up to the Election of 1932 ● Herbert Hoover was the president prior to the election of 1932 ● Prior to the election, five thousand banks had failed, and by the end of 1932, one third of the nation’s workforce was unemployed. ● Farm income had declined from 12 million dollars in 1929 to 5 million dollars by the end of 1932. ● Herbert Hoover’s popularity decreased significantly because of his inability to reverse the economic collapse. Map of the Election of 1932 The Election of 1932 ● Democrats had only elected one president since 1896 ● Franklin D. Roosevelt v.s Herbert Hoover ● FDR would be a shoo-in for the election ● FDR would promise a “New Deal” for the American people ● The election marked the end of the “Fourth Party System” and would commence the “Fifth Party System” Fourth Party System and Fifth Party System The Fourth party System marks the period in political history that was dominated by the republican party, also known as the “Progressive Era.” The Great Depression served as the springboard. The election in 1932 would be a realigning election giving way to the Fifth Party System.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Parties in a Critical Era by John H. Aldrich
    Political Parties in a Critical Era1 by John H. Aldrich Duke University Prepared for delivery at “The State of the Parties: 1996 and Beyond,” Bliss Institute Conference, University of Akron, October 9-10, 1997 Political Parties in a Critical Era 2 Democracy, we often forget, is a process, and thus is continually in the making. It is not, as we usually like to think of it, an outcome. The central questions to ask about this process concern, first, the relationship between the beliefs and actions of citizens and of those whom they choose to govern them. The second question concerns the consequences of elite actions, that is, the policies and other outputs of the political system. This relationship between the mass and elite evolves over time, and as a result so does the pattern of policy produced by the government. That evolution is, indeed, the consequence of democracy being a process and not an outcome. Richard Niemi and I (Aldrich and Niemi, 1990; 1996; Aldrich, 1995) proposed a slight generalization and redefinition of V.O. Key's concept of a critical election (1955). We also offered a method for demonstrating at least some of the features of what we called "critical eras" and the period of stability (perhaps even equilibrium) in between. In our view, the 1960s were a critical era, and the 1970s and 1980s were a period of stable alignment.2 We dubbed the stable era that of the "candidate-centered party system," due to the importance of candidates and their assessments in shaping citizens’ choices, of the individual impact of incumbency on elections, and of related aspects of candidate-centered elections that so mark this period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old Freedom, 25 Marq
    Marquette Law Review Volume 25 Article 8 Issue 1 December 1940: A Symposium on Freedom The Old rF eedom William Sternberg Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr Part of the Law Commons Repository Citation William Sternberg, The Old Freedom, 25 Marq. L. Rev. 34 (1940). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/mulr/vol25/iss1/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE OLD FREEDOM WILLIAM STERNBERG D URING his presidency Woodrow Wilson wrote an interesting little volume which, with his usual felicitous diction, he called "The New Freedom." It was, in fact, a collection of his campaign speeches elaborating the party program. He endeavored to explain how the government could be carried on successfully at the least expense to the people. The "philosophy of spending" seems never to have occurred to him. Again, instead of curtailing production and paying for non- production, he seeks to employ the energies of the nation to their fullest extent. In two chapter headings he defines the New Freedom as "the emancipation of business" and "the liberation of the people's vital energies." The following disquisition is not intended as a discussion of econ- omic theory. It proposes rather to re-examine the concept of freedom as a problem in jurisprudence, which Prof. J. W. Burgess in his notable book on that subject characterized as "the reconciliation of government with liberty." He observed that there was more governmental regula- tion of our personal affairs than had been customary in our political history up to that time.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to American Government News the Logic of American Politics
    News Jeb Bush wants to push back the retirement age for Social Security by as many as five years, The Hill reports. Said Bush: “I think it needs to be phased in over an extended period of time. We need to look over the horizon and begin to phase in, over an extended period of time, going from 65 to 68 or 70. And that, by itself, will help sustain the retirement system for anybody under the age of 40.” “At the same time, Bush said that he would be open to cutting back benefits for wealthy people and their beneficiaries, a reform proposal known as means testing.” “The Rand Paul pile-on session began a few hours before sunset Sunday evening,” Politico reports. “Behind closed doors in the Senate’s Strom Thurmond Room, Republican senators lashed out at the junior Kentucky Republican’s defiant stance to force the expiration of key sections of the PATRIOT Act, a law virtually all of them support. Indiana Sen. Dan Coats’ criticism was perhaps the most biting: He accused the senator of ‘lying’ about the matter in order to raise money for his presidential campaign, according to three people who attended the meeting.” “The message may have gotten through to Paul except for one thing: The libertarian-minded senator skipped the hour-long meeting. That only infuriated his colleagues more.” Introduction to American Government Income inequality, by many measures, is now greater than it has been since the 1920s. Linz and Stepan suggest that we need to look to comparative politics rather POLS 1101 than Americanist political science in order to understand the sources of American inequality.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Constitutional Choices: Political Parties, Groups, and Prohibition
    Constitutional Choices: Political Parties, Groups, and Prohibition Politics in the United States Aaron J. Ley, Ph.D. University of Rhode Island Department of Political Science 206 Washburn Hall Kingston, RI 02881 [email protected] 401.874.7893 Cornell W. Clayton Washington State University School of Politics, Philosophy, and Public Affairs Johnson Tower 814 Pullman, WA [email protected] Abstract: The Prohibition-Era is an exceptional period of American history spawning the only constitutional amendment ever to grant a specific police power to the federal government, as well as the first effort to repeal a constitutional amendment. Most accounts of the Eighteenth and Twenty First Amendments to the U.S. Constitution focus on the temperance movement and interest groups while largely ignoring the role played by major political parties. This is because prohibition split the electoral coalitions of both major parties and support for the amendment was thus characterized as “bipartisan” or “non-partisan” in nature. In this paper, we argue that partisan politics is an integral part of the constitutional politics of this period. The split in the parties’ political coalitions, together with the unsettled and closely divided nature of electoral politics during the transition from the third to the fourth party systems, played an important role, perhaps the key role in enactment of the Eighteenth Amendment, permitting its passage even as neither national party supported it. The Eighteenth Amendment thus is the only constitutional amendment since the founding period to be enacted without supported of one or both of the major political parties. The national political parties also played a role in enactment of the Twenty First Amendment, supporting tacitly or explicitly the repeal of prohibition.
    [Show full text]
  • Voting Contagion
    Voting Contagion Dan Braha1,2 and Marcus A.M. de Aguiar1,3 1 New England Complex Systems Institute, Cambridge, MA, United States, 2 University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA, United States, 3 Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil Social influence plays an important role in human behavior and decisions. The sources of influence can be generally divided into external, which are independent of social context, or as originating from peers, such as family and friends. An important question is how to disentangle the social contagion by peers from external influences. While a variety of experimental and observational studies provided insight into this problem, identifying the extent of social contagion based on large-scale observational data with an unknown network structure remains largely unexplored. By bridging the gap between the large-scale complex systems perspective of collective human dynamics and the detailed approach of the social sciences, we present a parsimonious model of social influence, and apply it to a central topic in political scienceelections and voting behavior. We provide an analytical expression of the county vote-share distribution in a two-party system, which is in excellent agreement with 92 years of observed U.S. presidential election data. Analyzing the social influence topography over this period reveals an abrupt transition in the patterns of social contagionfrom low to high levels of social contagion. The results from our analysis reveal robust differences among regions of the United States in terms of their social influence index. In particular, we identify two regions of ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ spots of social influence, each comprising states that are geographically close.
    [Show full text]