Shared Care Protocol for the Prescribing and Monitoring of Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine and Memantine in Accordance with NICE TA217

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shared Care Protocol for the Prescribing and Monitoring of Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine and Memantine in Accordance with NICE TA217 Shared Care Protocol – Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine and Memantine Shared care protocol for the prescribing and monitoring of Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine and Memantine in accordance with NICE TA217 PATIENT’S NAME: PATIENT’S ADDRESS: HOSPITAL NAME AND NHS NUMBER / PATIENT IDENTIFIER: CONSULTANT’S NAME AND CONTACT DETAILS: GP’s NAME: Click here for SEPT prescribing guidelines on management of Alzheimer’s disease What are key elements of the process to ensure good shared care arrangements are in place? It is imperative that the GP is contacted to discuss shared care arrangements before treatment is commenced to ensure that they are willing to jointly manage the patient’s therapy. It is reasonable to expect the hospital clinician to prescribe if the patient will have to regularly attend hospital for specialist monitoring. PCT policies on clinical effectiveness should be adhered to. The GP should have sufficient information on the drug to either allow them to monitor the patient’s response to therapy and adjust dosages as required or know in what circumstances they should refer the patient back to the hospital clinician. Where the hospital clinician retains responsibility for monitoring drug therapy or making dosage adjustments, the general practitioner must be informed of any dose changes as soon as possible to avoid an incorrect dose being prescribed/administered. Similarly if the GP changes the patient’s medication then the hospital clinician involved in the shared care agreement should be informed of any changes that the GP undertakes. If a GP is unhappy to participate in a shared care agreement, the PCT should be asked for assistance in facilitating suitable prescribing arrangements for the patient. Informing the patient’s usual community pharmacist of the medication will help ensure that supplies are available. 1 Approved by Medicines Management Committee November 2011/Beds & Luton Joint Prescribing Committee December 2011 Shared Care Protocol – Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine and Memantine SUMMARY OF SPECIALIST / MEMORY ASSESSMENT SERVICE RESPONSIBILITIES. 1. Confirm the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease, including type. 2. Assess the likelihood of patient/carer compliance. Counsel carers as to the likely benefits and risks of treatment, including the consequence of poor compliance. 3. Offer advice as to the limited effectiveness of treatment over time as the illness progresses. 4. Clear documentation of mental capacity assessments/power of attorney in patient notes 5. Provide the GP, in the form of a detailed report, information relating to the initial memory clinic assessment. The Prescription Clinic will inform the GP of progress with dose titration at weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16 (depending on the cognitive enhancing drug prescribed) during the medication titration phase. 6. On initiation provide the GP and patient with information about treatment, particularly with regard to stopping treatment in due course, and the conditions/circumstances when treatment may be stopped, and the benefits that might be expected from a successful trial period for that patient in accordance with NICE TA217 7. Offer an initial trial period of treatment for approximately 3 months, and assess response during, and at the end of the trial period. The dose should be titrated according to response and tolerance. When the requisite response has been elicited at a dose commensurate with patient tolerability (usually 3 months), consideration can be given to transferring to the GP for shared care. 8. Prescriptions should be always be generated in the generic form. 9. Liaise with the GP to agree to share the patient’s care after the maintenance dose has been achieved. 10. Assessing the patient’s continuing response to treatment every 6 months or sooner if deemed necessary by the GP. 11. The prescription clinic will inform the GP of the patient’s tolerance to the medication and initial qualitative carer reports of its efficacy at the time that the maintenance dose is achieved. The Prescription Clinic will review the patient if further mental health input is warranted, e.g. behavioural disturbances. Information on re- assessments will be communicated to the GP after each clinic visit. 12. Deal with any behavioural difficulties experienced by the patient, including those arising from the use of an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor and any other adverse events reported by the GP relating to the treatment of this condition. 13. Evaluate adverse events noted by the GP or the patient. 14. Overall monitoring of disease status and drug therapy. 15. Dosage adjustment. 16. On discontinuing treatment, consider restarting/switching treatment if the patient experiences a dramatic deterioration of cognitive function or unacceptable side effects. Inform GP and patient/carer of rationale. 2 Approved by Medicines Management Committee November 2011/Beds & Luton Joint Prescribing Committee December 2011 Shared Care Protocol – Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine and Memantine SUMMARY OF GP RESPONSIBILITIES 1. Provide a full drug/medical history (preferably as recorded on the GP computerised records) to the Memory Assessment Service. 2. Prior to referral to the Memory Assessment Service, perform an initial blood screen to rule out possible causes for cognitive impairment (FBC, ESR, U&E, LFT, GGT, calcium profile, blood glucose, TFT, B12 and red cell folate). Also provide a 12-lead ECG if practically possible. 3. Once the patient has been adequately stabilised and benefit from drug therapy has been demonstrated, the GP will accept prescribing responsibility for the relevant drug, usually after 3 months. Generic prescriptions should be generated whenever possible. 4. Monitor the patients overall health and wellbeing during the normal consultation process. 5. Report signs of disease progression to form part of the 6 monthly Specialist/Memory Assessment Clinic assessments. 6. At the time of referral, inform the specialist clinician regarding the availability of a carer or care-worker in order to ensure compliance with treatment. 7. Check for possible drug interactions when newly prescribing or stopping concurrent medication. 8. Report any suspected adverse event to the specialist clinician and, if appropriate, to the MHRA. 9. Deal with any concomitant illness, with specialist clinic support if appropriate. 10. Refer the patient to the specialist clinician upon admission to a nursing home, to evaluate treatment efficacy. 11. Inform the specialist clinic regarding life situation changes. 12. On discontinuation of treatment, refer to the specialist clinician if the patient is observed to experience a dramatic deterioration in cognitive function. COMMUNICATION 1. The GP will be contacted to discuss shared care arrangements to ensure that he/she is willing to jointly manage the patient’s therapy after maintenance dose has been achieved. GPs will be sent a copy of the shared care guidelines. 2. Any changes to a patient’s overall medication that might affect, or be affected by, their treatment with a cognitive enhancing drug should be notified to the Prescription Clinic as soon as possible, ideally prior to the change being made. Drugs that may potentially interact with the cognitive enhancing drugs are detailed in the individual drug fact sheets. It is important that, as far as is possible, a patient’s overall medication remains unchanged during the initial Prescription Clinic phase. 3. The GP and Specialist/Memory Assessment Clinic/Prescribing Clinic should inform each other of any dose changes made as soon as possible to avoid an incorrect dose being administered. 4. The GP should be sent details of full assessments carried out by the Specialist/Memory Assessment Clinic/Prescription Clinic. 3 Approved by Medicines Management Committee November 2011/Beds & Luton Joint Prescribing Committee December 2011 Shared Care Protocol – Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine and Memantine Where there is a disagreement around prescribing for Dementia/Alzheimer’s Disease for justified reasons, which cannot be resolved satisfactorily, prescribing responsibility will remain with the specialist clinic. PRESCRIBING COSTS Based on Drug Tariff, April 2011 Drug Form Cost of 3 month trial based on Annual Cost at recommended doses indicated below daily doses indicated below Tabs 5 mg, 10 mg £227.63 (5mg od for 1 month, then £718.20(5mg od) Donepezil Orodispersible Tabs 5mg, 10mg 10mg od for 2 months) £982.64 (10mg od) (Aricept Evess®) Caps1.5mg, 3mg, 4.5mg, 6mg £234.75 (cost is same throughout £1017.25 (cost is same throughout dosage range for caps) dosage range for caps) £312.29 (based on titration upto 6mg £1561.45 (based on titration upto Oral solution 2 mg/mL. Rivastigmine bd) 6mg bd) Patches, 4.6 mg/24 hours; 9.5 mg/24 £233.91 (cost is same throughout £935.64 (cost is same throughout hours range) range) (Exelon) Tabs 8mg, 12mg £186.48 (4mg bd for 1 month, then £785.68 (8mg bd) 8mg bd for 1 month & then 12mg bd Oral solution 4mg/mL. £942.48 (12mg bd) for 1 month) £207.00 (8mg od for 1 month, then £765.78 (16mg od) M/R Caps 8mg, 16mg, 24mg (Reminyl 16mg od for a month, then 24mg od Galantamine XL) £925.20(24mg od) for a month) £403.00 (4mg bd for 1 month, then Oral solution 4mg/mL. 8mg bd for 1 month & then 12mg bd £2217.40 (12mgbd) for 1 month) £181.15 (cost based on titration pack Tabs 10mg – 5mg od, increased by 5mg weekly £802.24 (20mg od) to 20mg od Memantine Oral solution 5mg/actuation £123.23 (as above) £765.27 (20mg od) (10mg/ml) Prices are based on current available licensed products and are likely to change with patent expiration and the introduction of generic alternatives. Generic prescribing, where appropriate, is strongly encouraged. Premium formulations, e.g. patches/orodispersible/liquids should only be prescribed when clinically necessary, e.g. swallowing difficulties. Although Aricept tablets and Aricept Evess (Orodispersible tablets) are currently identically priced, it is anticipated that this will change in 2012. The continued use of orodispersible tablets (Evess) should be reviewed in patients receiving this formulation and whenever clinically possible standard generic donepezil should be prescribed to achieve maximum cost savings.
Recommended publications
  • Pyridostigmine in the Treatment of Postural
    Pyridostigmine in the Treatment of Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia: A Single-Center Experience KHALIL KANJWAL, M.D.,* BEVERLY KARABIN, PH.D.,* MUJEEB SHEIKH, M.D.,* LAWRENCE ELMER, M.D., PH.D.,† YOUSUF KANJWAL, M.D.,* BILAL SAEED, M.D.,* and BLAIR P. GRUBB, M.D.* From the *Electrophysiology Section, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio; and †Department of Neurology, The University of Toledo College of Medicine, Health Science Campus, Toledo, Ohio Background: The long-term efficacy of pyridostigmine, a reversible acetyl cholinesterase inhibitor, in the treatment of postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS) patients remains unclear. We report our retrospective, single-center, long-term experience regarding the efficacy and adverse effect profile of pyridostigmine in the treatment of POTS patients. Methods: This retrospective study included an extensive review of electronic charts and data collection in regards to patient demographics, orthostatic parameters, side-effect profile, subjective response to therapy, as well as laboratory studies recorded at each follow-up visit to our institution’s Syncope and Autonomic Disorders Center. The response to pyridostigmine therapy was considered successful if patient had both symptom relief in addition to an objective response in orthostatic hemodynamic parameters (heart rate [HR] and blood pressure). Three hundred patients with POTS were screened for evaluation in this study. Of these 300, 203 patients with POTS who received pyridostigmine therapy were reviewed. Of these 203 patients, 168 were able to tolerate the medication after careful dose titration. The mean follow- up duration in this group of patients was 12 ± 3 (9–15) months. Pyridostigmine improved symptoms of orthostatic intolerance in 88 of 203 (43%) of total patients or 88 of 172 (51%) who were able to tolerate the drug.
    [Show full text]
  • Corticosterone and Pyridostigmine/DEET Exposure
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Neurotoxicology Manuscript Author . Author Manuscript Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 May 24. Published in final edited form as: Neurotoxicology. 2019 January ; 70: 26–32. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2018.10.006. Corticosterone and pyridostigmine/DEET exposure attenuate peripheral cytokine expression: Supporting a dominant role for neuroinflammation in a mouse model of Gulf War Illness Lindsay T. Michalovicza, Alicia R. Lockera, Kimberly A. Kellya, Julie V. Millera, Zachary Barnesb,c, Mary Ann Fletcherb,c, Diane B. Millera, Nancy G. Klimasb,c, Mariana Morrisb, Stephen M. Lasleyd, and James P. O’Callaghana,* aHealth Effects Laboratory Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, USA bInstitute for Neuro-Immune Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA cMiami Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL, USA dDepartment of Cancer Biology & Pharmacology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL, USA Abstract Gulf War Illness (GWI) is a chronic multi-symptom disorder experienced by as many as a third of the veterans of the 1991 Gulf War; the constellation of “sickness behavior” symptoms observed in ill veterans is suggestive of a neuroimmune involvement. Various chemical exposures and conditions in theater have been implicated in the etiology of the illness. Previously, we found that GW-related organophosphates (OPs), such as the sarin surrogate, DFP, and chlorpyrifos, cause neuroinflammation. The combination of these exposures with exogenous corticosterone (CORT), mimicking high physiological stress, exacerbates the observed neuroinflammation. The potential relationship between the effects of OPs and CORT on the brain versus inflammation in the periphery has not been explored.
    [Show full text]
  • Title 16. Crimes and Offenses Chapter 13. Controlled Substances Article 1
    TITLE 16. CRIMES AND OFFENSES CHAPTER 13. CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ARTICLE 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS § 16-13-1. Drug related objects (a) As used in this Code section, the term: (1) "Controlled substance" shall have the same meaning as defined in Article 2 of this chapter, relating to controlled substances. For the purposes of this Code section, the term "controlled substance" shall include marijuana as defined by paragraph (16) of Code Section 16-13-21. (2) "Dangerous drug" shall have the same meaning as defined in Article 3 of this chapter, relating to dangerous drugs. (3) "Drug related object" means any machine, instrument, tool, equipment, contrivance, or device which an average person would reasonably conclude is intended to be used for one or more of the following purposes: (A) To introduce into the human body any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; (B) To enhance the effect on the human body of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; (C) To conceal any quantity of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state; or (D) To test the strength, effectiveness, or purity of any dangerous drug or controlled substance under circumstances in violation of the laws of this state. (4) "Knowingly" means having general knowledge that a machine, instrument, tool, item of equipment, contrivance, or device is a drug related object or having reasonable grounds to believe that any such object is or may, to an average person, appear to be a drug related object.
    [Show full text]
  • Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor Pyridostigmine Bromide Attenuates Gut Pathology and Bacterial Dysbiosis in a Murine Model of Ulcerative Colitis
    Florida International University FIU Digital Commons HWCOM Faculty Publications Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine 10-23-2019 Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor Pyridostigmine Bromide Attenuates Gut Pathology and Bacterial Dysbiosis in a Murine Model of Ulcerative Colitis SP Singh Hitendra S. Chand S. Banerjee H. Agarwal V. Raizada See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/com_facpub Part of the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons This work is brought to you for free and open access by the Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine at FIU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in HWCOM Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of FIU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors SP Singh, Hitendra S. Chand, S. Banerjee, H. Agarwal, V. Raizada, S. Roy, and M. Sopori Digestive Diseases and Sciences (2020) 65:141–149 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-019-05838-6 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitor Pyridostigmine Bromide Attenuates Gut Pathology and Bacterial Dysbiosis in a Murine Model of Ulcerative Colitis Shashi P. Singh1 · Hitendra S. Chand2 · Santanu Banerjee3 · Hemant Agarwal4 · Veena Raizada4 · Sabita Roy3 · Mohan Sopori1 Received: 30 March 2019 / Accepted: 10 September 2019 / Published online: 23 October 2019 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a Th2 infammatory bowel disease characterized by increased IL-5 and IL-13 expres- sion, eosinophilic/neutrophilic infltration, decreased mucus production, impaired epithelial barrier, and bacterial dysbiosis of the colon. Acetylcholine and nicotine stimulate mucus production and suppress Th2 infammation through nicotinic receptors in lungs but UC is rarely observed in smokers and the mechanism of the protection is unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Preoperative Medication Management
    Guideline: Preoperative Medication Management Guideline for Preoperative Medication Management Purpose of Guideline: To provide guidance to physicians, advanced practice providers (APPs), pharmacists, and nurses regarding medication management in the preoperative setting. Background: Appropriate perioperative medication management is essential to ensure positive surgical outcomes and prevent medication misadventures.1 Results from a prospective analysis of 1,025 patients admitted to a general surgical unit concluded that patients on at least one medication for a chronic disease are 2.7 times more likely to experience surgical complications compared with those not taking any medications. As the aging population requires more medication use and the availability of various nonprescription medications continues to increase, so does the risk of polypharmacy and the need for perioperative medication guidance.2 There are no well-designed trials to support evidence-based recommendations for perioperative medication management; however, general principles and best practice approaches are available. General considerations for perioperative medication management include a thorough medication history, understanding of the medication pharmacokinetics and potential for withdrawal symptoms, understanding the risks associated with the surgical procedure and the risks of medication discontinuation based on the intended indication. Clinical judgement must be exercised, especially if medication pharmacokinetics are not predictable or there are significant risks associated with inappropriate medication withdrawal (eg, tolerance) or continuation (eg, postsurgical infection).2 Clinical Assessment: Prior to instructing the patient on preoperative medication management, completion of a thorough medication history is recommended – including all information on prescription medications, over-the-counter medications, “as needed” medications, vitamins, supplements, and herbal medications. Allergies should also be verified and documented.
    [Show full text]
  • Galantamine 4Mg/Ml Oral Solution Package Leaflet
    Package leaflet: Information for the user Galantamine 4mg/ml Oral Solution Read all of this leaflet carefully before you start taking this medicine because it contains important information for you. n Keep this leaflet. You may need to read it again. n If you have any further questions, ask your doctor or pharmacist. n This medicine has been prescribed for you only. Do not pass it on to others. It may harm them, even if their signs of illness are the same as yours. n If you get any side effects, talk to your doctor or pharmacist. This includes any possible side effects not listed in this leaflet. See section 4. What is in this leaflet: 1. What Galantamine Oral Solution is and what it is used for 2. What you need to know before you take Galantamine Oral Solution 3. How to take Galantamine Oral Solution 4. Possible side effects 5. How to store Galantamine Oral Solution 6. Contents of the pack and other information 1. What Galantamine Oral Solution is and what it is used for What your medicine is The full name of your medicine is Galantamine 4mg/ml Oral Solution. In this leaflet the shorter name Galantamine is used. Galantamine belongs to a group of medicines known as ‘anti-dementia’ medicines. What your medicine is used for Galantamine is used in adults to treat the symptoms of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s disease. This is a type of dementia that alters the way the brain works. Alzheimer’s disease causes memory loss, confusion and changes in behaviour, which make it increasingly difficult to carry out normal daily tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivastigmine
    International Journal of Organic Chemistry, 2011, 1, 26-32 doi:10.4236/ijoc.2011.12005 Published Online June 2011 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ijoc) A Simple and Highly Efficient Enantioselective Synthesis of (S)-Rivastigmine Veera R. Arava1*, Laxminarasimhulu Gorentla1, Pramod K. Dubey2 1R&D Laboratory, Suven Life Sciences Ltd., Hyderabad, India 2Department of Chemistry, J. N. T. University, Hyderabad, India E-mail: [email protected] Received April 1, 2011; revised May 17, 2011; accepted May 28, 2011 Abstract A highly efficient and convenient procedure for the enantioselective synthesis of (S)-Rivastigmine, a cho- linergic agent for the treatment of mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer’s type and dementia due to Parkinson’s disease, is accomplished by the treatment of versatile, readily accessible (S)-(-)-2-methyl- 2-propanesulfinamide with 3-hydroxyacetophenone. This protocol provides high yield and excellent enan- tiomeric excess in short step synthesis. Keywords: Cholinergic Agent, Enantioselective, Highly Efficient, (S)-(-)-2-Methyl-2-Propane Sulfinamide, (S)-Rivastigmine 1. Introduction hibits the desired cholinesterase inhibition, which re- quires the drug in enantiomerically pure form. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of The insertion of chiral amine functionality through dementia, a severe human health threat with more than N-sulfinylimines is a major breakthrough endeavor due 30 million sufferers worldwide [1]. Rivastigmine, (S)-3- to the exceptional behavior of the chiral sulfinyl group in [1-(dimethylamino)ethyl] phenyl ethyl (methyl) car- N-sulfinylimines, as an activator, chiral controller and bamate 1, is the first USFDA approved drug in the form useful protective group and finally recyclability [8] of capsules and patches for the treatment of mild to makes the sulfinamides extremely versatile chiral re- moderate dementia of the Alzheimer’s type [2-5] and for agents (Figure 2) [9].
    [Show full text]
  • 12.2% 122,000 135M Top 1% 154 4,800
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE We are IntechOpen, provided by IntechOpen the world’s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 4,800 122,000 135M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our authors are among the 154 TOP 1% 12.2% Countries delivered to most cited scientists Contributors from top 500 universities Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index in Web of Science™ Core Collection (BKCI) Interested in publishing with us? Contact [email protected] Numbers displayed above are based on latest data collected. For more information visit www.intechopen.com Chapter Anticholinesterases Zeynep Özdemir and Mehmet Abdullah Alagöz Abstract Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) are known serine hydrolase enzymes responsible for the hydrolysis of acetylcholine (ACh). Although the role of AChE in cholinergic transmission is well known, the role of BChE has not been elucidated sufficiently. The hydrolysis of acetylcholine in the synaptic healthy brain cells is mainly carried out by AChE; it is accepted that the contribution to the hydrolysis of BChE is very low, but both AChE and BChE are known to play an active role in neuronal development and cholinergic transmission. Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a muscle disease characterized by weakness in skeletal muscles and rapid fatigue. Anticholinesterases, which are not only related to the immune origin of the disease but also have only symp- tomatic benefit, have an indispensable role in the treatment of MG. Pyridostigmine, distigmine, neostigmine, and ambenonium are the standard anticholinesterase drugs used in the symptomatic treatment of MG.
    [Show full text]
  • Myasthenia Gravis After Botulinum Toxin Type a Injection Botulinum Toksin Tip a Enjeksiyonu Sonrası Açığa Çıkan Myasthenia Gravis Olgusu
    DO I:10.4274/tnd.02703 Turk J Neurol 2016;22:143-144 Letter to Editor / Editöre Mektup Myasthenia Gravis after Botulinum Toxin Type A Injection Botulinum Toksin Tip A Enjeksiyonu Sonrası Açığa Çıkan Myasthenia Gravis Olgusu Hacer Durmuş Tekçe, Feza Deymeer, Piraye Oflazer Serdaroğlu, Yeşim Parman İstanbul University İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, İstanbul, Turkey Keywords: Myasthenia gravis, Botulinum toxin A, dystonia Anahtar Kelimeler: Myasthenia gravis, Botulinum toksin tip A, distoni Introduction showed right dominant bilateral ptosis, mild restriction of lateral gaze of the right eye, isochoric pupils, and weakness of eye Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT type A) is a neurotoxin produced tightening. Her speech had a nasal quality. The masseter muscles, by Clostridium botulinum, which causes paralysis by presynaptically tongue, and the flexors of neck were weak. Motor examination of binding to the cholinergic nerve terminals at the neuromuscular other muscles was normal. Generalized botulism, a rare adverse junction and decreasing the release of acetylcholine (1). BoNT type effect of BoNT type A injection, was considered in the patient. A, first used to treat strabismus, is now widely used to treat dystonia, Supportive treatment and pyridostigmine 60 mg 5 times per day spasticity, and other movement disorders, and also autonomic nervous were given. Worsening of the symptoms, fluctuating weakness, and system disorders including hyperhidrosis and sialorrhea (2). As with inadequate response to pyridostigmine suggested the diagnosis of the effects of the toxin, the adverse effects are also reversible. The MG. Repetitive nerve stimulation performed 6 weeks after BoNT most common and severe adverse effects of the toxin are unwanted type A injection revealed dysfunction of neuromuscular junction and excessive weakness of muscle after injection, paralysis of adjacent and autoantibodies against acetylcholine receptors were found muscles caused by diffusion of the toxin and iatrogenic botulism positive in serum.
    [Show full text]
  • PYRIDOSTIGMINE BROMIDE- Pyridostigmine Bromide Tablet Valeant Canada Limited
    PYRIDOSTIGMINE BROMIDE- pyridostigmine bromide tablet Valeant Canada Limited ---------- HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION CAUTION: USE AS A PRETREATMENT ONLY - USE ATROPINE AND 2-PAM AFTER SOMAN EXPOSURE - USE PROTECTIVE GARMENT(S) See full prescribing information for complete boxed warning. Pyridostigmine bromide is for use as a pretreatment for exposure to the chemical nerve agent Soman. Pyridostigmine alone will not protect against exposure to Soman. The efficacy of pyridostigmine is dependent upon the rapid use of atropine and pralidoxime (2-PAM) after Soman exposure. Primary protection against exposure to chemical nerve agents is the wearing of protective garments. Pyridostigmine must not be taken after exposure to Soman. If taken immediately before Soman exposure (e.g., when the gas attack alarm is given) or at the same time as poisoning by Soman, it is not expected to be effective, and may exacerbate the effects of a sub-lethal exposure to Soman. INDICATIONS AND USAGE Pyridostigmine bromide is a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor indicated for pretreatment against the lethal effects of soman nerve agent poisoning. (1) Pyridostigmine bromide is for use in conjunction with Protective garments, including a gas mask, and Immediate atropine and pralidoxime therapy at the first sign of nerve agent poisoning. (1) DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION One 30 mg tablet every 8 hours. (2) Start at least several hours prior to exposure to Soman. (2) At the first sign of Soman poisoning pyridostigmine must be stopped, and atropine and 2-PAM be administered. (2) Use beyond 14 consecutive days should be evaluated in the context of the likelihood of Soman exposure. (2) Store refrigerated between 2 and 8°C (36-46°F).
    [Show full text]
  • Quantification of Caffeine from Urine in Spanish Triathletes
    Artículo original Quantifi cation of caffeine from urine in spanish triathletes Quantifi cation of caffeine from urine in Spanish triathletes Natividad Sebastià, Carmen Daries, José Miguel Soriano, Jordi Mañes, Carmen Escriva Laboratorio de Nutrición. Facultad de Farmacia. Universidad de Valencia. Cuantifi cación de cafeína en orina de triatletas españoles Recibido: 26.07.2012 Resumen Aceptado: 07.09.2012 Introducción: La ingesta de cafeína sigue siendo común entre los atletas con el objetivo de mejorar su rendimiento deportivo, aunque desde el 1 de enero de 2004, la cafeína ha sido eliminado de la lista de sustancias prohibidas de la Agencia Mundial Antidopaje, aunque está consensuado no sobrepasar ciertos límites (12 μg mL-1) por los efectos secundarios producidos por esta. El uso de una rápida y fácil extracción en fase sólida para la cafeína seguido de cromatografía líquida es útil para evaluar la presencia en muestras de orina. Propósito: Investigar la presencia de cafeína urinaria de triatletas españoles usando una nueva extracción en fase sólida rápida y fácil seguido de cromatografía líquida acoplada a detección de ultravioleta (CL-UV). Métodos: Las muestras urinarias se extrajeron con un cartucho Sep-Pak de fase extractiva C18 seguido por CL-UV siendo utilizada la β-hidroxiteofi lina como estándar interno. Se estudió veintiséis triatletas españoles de nivel competitivo de edades comprendidas entre 24,4 y 25,9 años. Las muestras urinarias se recogieron después de la competición. Resultados: El método de extracción optimizado tiene un límite de detección una recuperación de 0,05 μg mL-1 y 92,8%, respectivamente. Se detectó la presencia de cafeína urinaria en un 80,8% de los triatletas estudiados con un rango de 0,06 a 1,99 μg mL-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Treatment Standards and Individualized Therapy of Myasthenia Gravis
    Review Paul Urban Peter et al. Treatment Standards and Individual- ized … Neurology International Open 2018; 00: 00–00 Treatment Standards and Individualized Therapy of Myasthenia Gravis Authors Peter Paul Urban1, Christian Jacobi2, Sebastian Jander3 Affiliations ABSTRacT 1 Neurologische Klinik, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Hamburg A wide range of established treatment options is currently 2 Neurologische Klinik, Krankenhaus Nordwest GmbH, available for myasthenia gravis. These include cholinesterase Frankfurt am Main inhibitors for symptomatic treatment and a broad spectrum of 3 Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf immunosuppressive, immunomodulating or cell-depleting options to modify the underlying immunological process. Ap- Key words propriate use allows the great majority of patients to lead a myasthenia gravis, neuromuscular disorder, treatment normal life. Specialized centers integrating outpatient and in-hospital resources as well as interdisciplinary competences Bibliography offer important advantages for optimum individualized therapy. DOI https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-124983 Neurology International Open 2018; 2: E84–E92 © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York ISSN 2511-1795 Correspondence Prof. Dr. med. Sebastian Jander, Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5 40225 Düsseldorf Germany [email protected] Introduction 1930s. In 1931 prostigmine (neostigmine) was first synthesized Myasthenia gravis is a well-treatable disease. Under optimal stand- and appeared to be a promising drug [2]. Lazar Remen, while work- ard therapy, approximately 85–90 % of all patients achieve good ing at the Münster University Hospital, was probably the first phy- treatment results with extensive remission of myasthenic symp- sician to treat a patient with myasthenia gravis using prostigmine, toms and recovery of everyday life skills [1].
    [Show full text]