IUCN Atlas of the Mediterranean Seamounts
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Establishing Repeatable Study Plots on Sa Dragonera, Mallorca to Assess Population Trends of the Local Breeding Balearic Shearwaters Puffinus Mauretanicus
Repeatable study plots on Sa Dragonera, to assess trends of the local breeding Balearic Shearwaters Establishing repeatable study plots on Sa Dragonera, Mallorca to assess population trends of the local breeding Balearic Shearwaters Puffinus mauretanicus Greg Morgan1*, Miguel McMinn2, Russell Wynn3, Rhiannon Meier3, Lou Maurice4, Biel Sevilla2, Ana Rodriguez2 & Tim Guilford5 *Correspondence author. Email: [email protected] 1 RSPB, Ramsey Island, St Davids, Pembrokeshire SA62 6PY, UK; 2 Balearic Shearwater Conservation Association, Puig del Teide 4, 07181 Palmanova, Balearic Islands, Spain; 3 National Oceanography Centre, European Way, Southampton, Hampshire SO14 3ZH, UK; 4 British Geological Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Crowmarsh Gifford, Oxfordshire OX10 8BB, UK; 5 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK. Abstract The Balearic Shearwater Puffinus mauretanicus is a Critically Endangered species endemic to the Balearic Islands, subject to a severe decline that could lead to the extinction of the species within three generations (Oro et al. 2004). Predation by introduced mammals is considered the main threat facing the species at its breeding grounds, and therefore conservation action is required along with subsequent monitoring in a species where such information is lacking. In order to assess the long-term impact of a rodent eradication project on the breeding success of the species on Sa Dragonera island, a series of study plots were established in April 2013. A survey was carried out to establish the minimum number of known Apparently Occupied Sites (AOS) within each plot. All potential nest sites within each plot were sampled for the presence of a bird(s) using a combination of methods: (i) tape playback, (ii) physical sighting (by eye or with an endoscope) and (iii) obvious signs of occupation. -
Appendix 2. the Mystery of Guyot Formation and Sinking
Appendix 2 The Mystery of Guyot Formation and Sinking Origin of Guyots Unknown In 1946, geologist Harry Hess was the first geologist to describe guyots (flat-topped seamount).1 Since then, the number of guyots has become numerous. Resolution Guyot in the Mid-Pacific Mountains that was studied in the 1990s by the Deep Sea Drilling Project2 is a typical guyot. Figure A2.1 shows the silhouette. Ever since Hess’s time, the cause of the flat top has eluded explanation.3 Winterer and Met- Figure A2.1. Silhouette of Resolution Guyot zler maintain: “Since Hess first recognized them in the Mid-Pacific Mountains (drawn by Mrs. Melanie Richard). in 1946, the origin of flat-topped seamounts, or guyots, has remained one of the most persistent problems in marine geology.”4 Since guyots are believed to have been truncated near sea level, there are two suggested subsid- ence mechanisms used to explain why they are now found well below sea level. But some guyots must have become flat well below sea level. Not All Guyots Eroded At Sea Level Many scientists have simply assumed that the flat top of a guyot was eroded at or near sea level.5,6 ‘This has been challenged by a few marine geologists.’7,8 For instance, a number of guyots near the East Pacific Rise have been attributed to the infilling of calderas by small lava flows well below sea level.9,10,11,12 “But, these guyots are small 1 Hess, H.H., 1946. Drowned ancient islands of the Pacific Basin. American Journal of Science 244:772–791. -
Marine Mammals and Sea Turtles of the Mediterranean and Black Seas
Marine mammals and sea turtles of the Mediterranean and Black Seas MEDITERRANEAN AND BLACK SEA BASINS Main seas, straits and gulfs in the Mediterranean and Black Sea basins, together with locations mentioned in the text for the distribution of marine mammals and sea turtles Ukraine Russia SEA OF AZOV Kerch Strait Crimea Romania Georgia Slovenia France Croatia BLACK SEA Bosnia & Herzegovina Bulgaria Monaco Bosphorus LIGURIAN SEA Montenegro Strait Pelagos Sanctuary Gulf of Italy Lion ADRIATIC SEA Albania Corsica Drini Bay Spain Dardanelles Strait Greece BALEARIC SEA Turkey Sardinia Algerian- TYRRHENIAN SEA AEGEAN SEA Balearic Islands Provençal IONIAN SEA Syria Basin Strait of Sicily Cyprus Strait of Sicily Gibraltar ALBORAN SEA Hellenic Trench Lebanon Tunisia Malta LEVANTINE SEA Israel Algeria West Morocco Bank Tunisian Plateau/Gulf of SirteMEDITERRANEAN SEA Gaza Strip Jordan Suez Canal Egypt Gulf of Sirte Libya RED SEA Marine mammals and sea turtles of the Mediterranean and Black Seas Compiled by María del Mar Otero and Michela Conigliaro The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of IUCN. Published by Compiled by María del Mar Otero IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Spain © IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Malaga, Spain Michela Conigliaro IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Spain Copyright © 2012 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources With the support of Catherine Numa IUCN Centre for Mediterranean Cooperation, Spain Annabelle Cuttelod IUCN Species Programme, United Kingdom Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the sources are fully acknowledged. -
The Balearics
The Balearics 7 D a y S a m p l e I t i n e r a r y 7 Day Sample Itinerary Day 1 Palma de Mallorca Day 2 Palma de Mallorca > Puerto d’Andratx Day 3 Puerto d’Andratx > Ibiza, Talamanca Bay Day 4 Talamanca Bay > Ibiza Town > Formentera Day 5 Ibiza > Bays of Cala Jondal > Ses Salines & Poroig Day 6 Ibiza > Ponent Nature Reserve > Mallorca Day 7 Mallorca > Palma de Mallorca Why choose the Balearics? There are plenty of reasons why the Balearics are such a hit with holiday makers, just off Spain’s east coast, these islands serve up everything from lively beaches and world-class clubs to prehistoric ruins and picturesque countryside. The Islands One can discover each of the four islands of the archipelago in a few days. Mallorca, the senior island, combining spectacular mountain scenery and hiking through to the standard sea ‘n’ sun seaside fun. Ibiza, famous for its dance music but also its relaxing and welcoming spirituality. The famous hippy market is a great place for a different view on local life. Menorca, a heaven of tranquility and tiny Formentera a chill-out island, where people can lose themselves for the entire summer, needing little more to keep them happy than white beaches and sunset parties. Day 1 - Palma de Mallorca Fly to Palma de Mallorca to begin your cruise through the Balearic Islands. Cosmopolitan Palma is Mallorca’s capital city and largest port. Its Moorish and European architecture is dominated by the Gothic cathedral, La Seu while the fascinating “old town” or central area, offers numerous narrow streets, hidden behind the high walls of ancient buildings. -
World Cruise - 2022 Use the Down Arrow from a Form Field
This document contains both information and form fields. To read information, World Cruise - 2022 use the Down Arrow from a form field. 20 world JAN 5, 2022 JAN 19, 2022 JAN 19, 2022 JAN 5, 2022 111 days 111 days 97 days 88 days 22 cruise roundtrip from roundtrip from Los Angeles to Ft. Lauderdale Ft. Lauderdale Los Angeles Ft. Lauderdale to Rome Florence/Pisa (Livorno) Genoa Rome (Civitavecchia) Catania Monte Carlo (Sicily) MONACO ITALY Naples Marseille Mykonos FRANCE GREECE Kusadasi PORTUGAL Atlantic Barcelona Heraklion Ocean SPAIN (Crete) Los Angeles Lisbon TURKEY UNITED Bermuda Ceuta Jerusalem/Bethlehem STATES (West End) (Spanish Morocco) Seville (Ashdod) ine (Cadiz) ISRAEL Athens e JORDAN Dubai Agadir (Piraeus) Aqaba Pacific MEXICO Madeira UNITED ARAB Ocean MOROCCO l Dat L (Funchal) Malta EMIRATES Ft. Lauderdale CANARY (Valletta) Suez Abu ISLANDS Canal Honolulu Huatulco Dhabi ne inn Puerto Santa Cruz Lanzarote OMAN a a Hawaii r o Hilo Vallarta NICARAGUA (Arrecife) de Tenerife Salãlah t t Kuala Lumpur I San Juan del Sur Cartagena (Port Kelang) Costa Rica COLOMBIA Sri Lanka PANAMA (Puntarenas) Equator (Colombo) Singapore Equator Panama Canal MALAYSIA INDONESIA Bali SAMOA (Benoa) AMERICAN Apia SAMOA Pago Pago AUSTRALIA South Pacific South Indian Ocean Atlantic Ocean Ocean Perth Auckland (Fremantle) Adelaide Sydney New Plymouth Burnie Picton Departure Ports Tasmania Christchurch More Ashore (Lyttelton) Overnight Fiordland NEW National Park ZEALAND up to continentscontinents (North America, South America, 111 51 Australia, Europe, Africa -
Atlas of the Mediterranean Seamounts and Seamount-Like Structures
Atlas of the Mediterranean Seamounts and Seamount-like Structures ULISSE 44 N JANUA S.LUCIA SPINOLA OCCHIALI ARAGÓ CALYPSO HILLS 42 CIALDI FELIBRES HILLS 42 TIBERINO ETRUSCHI LA RENAIXENÇA HILLS ALBANO MONTURIOL S.FELIÙ SMS DAUNO VERCELLI SALVÁ BRUTUS SPARTACUS CASSINIS EBRO BARONIE-K MARUSSI SECCHI-ADRIANO FARFALLE ALBATROS-CICERONE CRESQUES BERTRAN SELLI VENUS MORROT DE LA CIUTADELLA GORTANI SELE MONTE DELLA RONDINE TACITO SÓLLER ALABE DE MARCHI SIRENE SARDINIA D’ANCONA FLAVIO GIOIA AMENDOLARA 40 SALLUSTIO 40 MAGNAGHI POSEIDONE ROSSANO APHRODITI VAVILOV TIBULLO DIAMANTE MORROT CORNAGLIA V.EMANUELE CARIATI DE SA DRAGONERA MAJOR ISSEL PALINURO-STRABO OVIDIO VILADESTERS CATULLO GLAVKI ORAZIO MARSILI-PLINIO GLABRO ENOTRIO MANSEL JOHNSTON STONY SPONGE QUIRRA ENEA TITO LIVIO VIRGILIO ALCIONE AUGUSTO SES OLIVES GARIBALDI-GLAUCO LAMETINO 1 BROUKER JAUME 1 CORNACYA LAMETINO 2 COLOM TRAIANO LUCREZIO STOKES XABIA-IBIZA VESPASIANO LITERI SINAYA VALLSECA SISIFO EMILE BAUDOT GIULIO CESARE-CAESAR DREPANO ENARETE CASONI FONTSERÈ ICHNUSA IRA NAVTILOS CABO DE LA NAO AUSIÀS MARCH ANCHISE BELL GUYOT POMPEO PROMETEO MARTORELL ACESTE-TIBERIO EOLO FORMENTERA SOLUNTO ALKYONI FERRER SCUSO SAN VITO LOS MARTINES ALÍ BEI FINALE DON JUAN RESGUI RIBA SENTINELLE (SKERKI) BALIKÇI EL38 PLANAZO BIDDLECOMBE SILVIA 38 PLIS PLAS KEITH SECO DE PALOS ESTAFETTE HECATE ADVENTURE TALBOT TETIDE 170 km ÁGUILAS GALATEA PANTELLERIA ANFITRITE EMPEDOCLE PINNE ANTEO 2 KHAYR-AL-DIN CIMOTOE ANTEO 3 ABUBACER FOERSTNER NAMELESS PNT. E MADREPORE ANTEO 1 AVENZOAR PNT. CB CHELLA CABO DE GATA ANGELINA ALFEO SABINAR PNT. SW AVEMPACE-ALGARROBO MAIMONIDES RIDGE BANNOCK KOLUMBO DJIBOUTI-HERRADURA POLLUX BILIM ADRA-AVERROES MAIMONIDES BIRSA PNT. SE HERRADURA-DJIBOUTI LINOSA III AL-MANSOUR A EL SEGOVIANO DJIBOUTI VILLE ALBORÁN LINOSA I LINOSA II HÉSPERIDES HÉRCULES EL IDRISSI YUSUF KARPAS CATIFAS-W. -
Influence of Sediment Transport on Short-Term Recolonization by Seamount Infauna
MARINE ECO'R'OGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 123: 163-175,1995 Mu Published July 20 Ecol Prog Ser / Influence of sediment transport on short-term recolonization by seamount infauna Lisa A. Levin, Claudio DiBacco Marine Life Research Group, Scripps Instituliar of Oceanography, La Jolla, California 92093-0218, USA ABSTRACT: Rates and mechanisms of mEa'nnal recolonization in contrasting sediment transport regimes were examined by deploying hydrodynamically unbiased colonization trays at 2 sites -2 km apart on the flat summit plain of Fieberhg Cplyot in the eastern Pacific Ocean. Both study sites expe- rienced strong bottom currents and high shear velocity (U. exceeding 1.0 cm S-' daily). Macrofaunal recolonization of defaunated sediments on Werling Guyot was slow relative to observations in shal- low-water sediments, but rapid compared l&other unennched deep-sea treatments. Microbial colo- nization was slower but macrofaunal colon~isnwas faster at White Sand Swale (WSS, 585 m),where rippled foraminiferal sands migrate daily, than at Sea Pen Rim (SPR, 635 m), where the basaltic sands move infrequently. Total densities of macroiannal colonizers at WSS were 31 and 75% of ambient after 7 wk and 6.4 mo, respectively; at SPR they were 6 and 49% of ambient, respectively. Over % of the colonists were polychaetes (predominantly ksionids and dorvilleids) and aplacophoran molluscs. Species richness of colonizers was comparab.lle at SPR and WSS and did not differ substantially from ambient. Most of the species (91%) and indmduals (95%) recovered in colonization trays were taxa present in background cores. However, only 25% of the taxa colonizing tray sediments occurred in trays at both WSS and SPR. -
Ecosystems Mario V
Ecosystems Mario V. Balzan, Abed El Rahman Hassoun, Najet Aroua, Virginie Baldy, Magda Bou Dagher, Cristina Branquinho, Jean-Claude Dutay, Monia El Bour, Frédéric Médail, Meryem Mojtahid, et al. To cite this version: Mario V. Balzan, Abed El Rahman Hassoun, Najet Aroua, Virginie Baldy, Magda Bou Dagher, et al.. Ecosystems. Cramer W, Guiot J, Marini K. Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin -Current Situation and Risks for the Future, Union for the Mediterranean, Plan Bleu, UNEP/MAP, Marseille, France, pp.323-468, 2021, ISBN: 978-2-9577416-0-1. hal-03210122 HAL Id: hal-03210122 https://hal-amu.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03210122 Submitted on 28 Apr 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Climate and Environmental Change in the Mediterranean Basin – Current Situation and Risks for the Future First Mediterranean Assessment Report (MAR1) Chapter 4 Ecosystems Coordinating Lead Authors: Mario V. Balzan (Malta), Abed El Rahman Hassoun (Lebanon) Lead Authors: Najet Aroua (Algeria), Virginie Baldy (France), Magda Bou Dagher (Lebanon), Cristina Branquinho (Portugal), Jean-Claude Dutay (France), Monia El Bour (Tunisia), Frédéric Médail (France), Meryem Mojtahid (Morocco/France), Alejandra Morán-Ordóñez (Spain), Pier Paolo Roggero (Italy), Sergio Rossi Heras (Italy), Bertrand Schatz (France), Ioannis N. -
Wave Energy in the Balearic Sea. Evolution from a 29 Year Spectral Wave Hindcast
1 Wave energy in the Balearic Sea. Evolution from a 29 2 year spectral wave hindcast a b,∗ c 3 S. Ponce de Le´on , A. Orfila , G. Simarro a 4 UCD School of Mathematical Sciences. Dublin 4, Ireland b 5 IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB). 07190 Esporles, Spain. c 6 Institut de Ci´enciesdel Mar (CSIC). 08003 Barcelona, Spain. 7 Abstract 8 This work studies the wave energy availability in the Western Mediterranean 9 Sea using wave simulation from January 1983 to December 2011. The model 10 implemented is the WAM, forced by the ECMWF ERA-Interim wind fields. 11 The Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) data from MetOp satellite and the 12 TOPEX-Poseidon altimetry data are used to assess the quality of the wind 13 fields and WAM results respectively. Results from the hindcast are the 14 starting point to analyse the potentiality of obtaining wave energy around 15 the Balearic Islands Archipelago. The comparison of the 29 year hindcast 16 against wave buoys located in Western, Central and Eastern basins shows a 17 high correlation between the hindcasted and the measured significant wave 18 height (Hs), indicating a proper representation of spatial and temporal vari- 19 ability of Hs. It is found that the energy flux at the Balearic coasts range 20 from 9:1 kW=m, in the north of Menorca Island, to 2:5 kW=m in the vicinity 21 of the Bay of Palma. The energy flux is around 5 and 6 times lower in 22 summer as compared to winter. 23 Keywords: Mediterranean Sea, WAM model, wave energy, wave climate 24 variability, ASCAT, TOPEX-Poseidon ∗Corresponding author PreprintEmail submitted address: [email protected] Elsevier(A. -
Abyssal Hills: Influence of Topography on Benthic Foraminiferal Assemblages ⇑ Paris V
Progress in Oceanography 148 (2016) 44–55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Progress in Oceanography journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pocean Abyssal hills: Influence of topography on benthic foraminiferal assemblages ⇑ Paris V. Stefanoudis b, , Brian J. Bett a, Andrew J. Gooday a a National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom b Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, University of Southampton Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, United Kingdom article info abstract Article history: Abyssal plains, often thought of as vast flat areas, encompass a variety of terrains including abyssal hills, Received 8 February 2016 features that constitute the single largest landscape type on Earth. The potential influence on deep-sea Received in revised form 12 September benthic faunas of mesoscale habitat complexity arising from the presence of abyssal hills is still poorly 2016 understood. To address this issue we focus on benthic foraminifera (testate protists) in the >150-lm frac- Accepted 28 September 2016 tion of Megacorer samples (0–1 cm layer) collected at five different sites in the area of the Porcupine Available online 29 September 2016 Abyssal Plain Sustained Observatory (NE Atlantic, 4850 m water depth). Three sites are located on the tops of small abyssal hills (200–500 m elevation) and two on the adjacent abyssal plain. We examined Keywords: benthic foraminiferal assemblage characteristics (standing stock, diversity, composition) in relation to Deep-sea diversity Foraminifera seafloor topography (hills vs. plain). Density and rarefied diversity were not significantly different Mesoscale between the hills and the plain. -
THE MARINE PROTECTED AREAS of the BALEARIC SEA Marilles Foundation
THE MARINE PROTECTED AREAS OF THE BALEARIC SEA Marilles Foundation THE MARINE PROTECTED AREAS OF THE BALEARIC SEA A brief introduction What are marine protected areas? Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are portions of the marine The level of protection of the Balearic Islands’ MPAs varies environment, sometimes connected to the coast, under depending on the legal status and the corresponding some form of legal protection. MPAs are used globally as administrations. In the Balearic Islands we find MPAs in tools for the regeneration of marine ecosystems, with the inland waters that are the responsibility of the Balearic dual objective of increasing the productivity of fisheries Islands government and island governments (Consells), and resources and conserving marine habitats and species. in external waters that depend on the Spanish government. Inland waters are those that remain within the polygon We define MPAs as those where industrial or semi-indus- marked by the drawing of straight lines between the capes trial fisheries (trawling, purse seining and surface longlining) of each island. External waters are those outside. are prohibited or severely regulated, and where artisanal and recreational fisheries are subject to regulation. Figure 1. Map of the Balearic Islands showing the location of the marine protection designations. In this study we consider all of them as marine protected areas except for the Natura 2000 Network and Biosphere Reserve areas. Note: the geographical areas of some protection designations overlap. THE MARINE PROTECTED AREAS OF THE BALEARIC SEA Marilles Foundation Table 1. Description of the different marine protected areas of the Balearic Islands and their fishing restrictions. -
SESSION I : Geographical Names and Sea Names
The 14th International Seminar on Sea Names Geography, Sea Names, and Undersea Feature Names Types of the International Standardization of Sea Names: Some Clues for the Name East Sea* Sungjae Choo (Associate Professor, Department of Geography, Kyung-Hee University Seoul 130-701, KOREA E-mail: [email protected]) Abstract : This study aims to categorize and analyze internationally standardized sea names based on their origins. Especially noting the cases of sea names using country names and dual naming of seas, it draws some implications for complementing logics for the name East Sea. Of the 110 names for 98 bodies of water listed in the book titled Limits of Oceans and Seas, the most prevalent cases are named after adjacent geographical features; followed by commemorative names after persons, directions, and characteristics of seas. These international practices of naming seas are contrary to Japan's argument for the principle of using the name of archipelago or peninsula. There are several cases of using a single name of country in naming a sea bordering more than two countries, with no serious disputes. This implies that a specific focus should be given to peculiar situation that the name East Sea contains, rather than the negative side of using single country name. In order to strengthen the logic for justifying dual naming, it is suggested, an appropriate reference should be made to the three newly adopted cases of dual names, in the respects of the history of the surrounding region and the names, people's perception, power structure of the relevant countries, and the process of the standardization of dual names.