Ocalized Conflicts and Added New Inhibitions to the Use of Force

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ocalized Conflicts and Added New Inhibitions to the Use of Force JX 1428 RUSSIA B 72-107 F UNITED STATES RELATIONS WITH THE SOVIET UNION, 1960-1970: A SHORT CHRONOLOGY WITH INTRODUCTORY SUMMARY I S. y lCV *V /7F LIBRARY UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA / K i o c - 2 7l 1972 W DEPT. GOVT. PUBLICATIONS V4/ ,r. BARBARA MIHALCHENKO Foreign Affairs Analyst / I. Foreign Affairs Division May 2, 1972 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Summary ------------------------------------------ 1 I. Conflict and Crisis, 1960-1964 ----------------------- 2 II. On the Threshold of the Era of Negotiations, 4 1965-1970 ----------------------------------------- III. Chronology ------------------------------------------- 6 1 UNITED STATES RELATIONS WITH THE SOVIET UNION, 1960-1970: A SHORT CHRONOLOGY WITH INTRODUCTORY SUMMARY* S7AYARY The decade of the 1960's can be viewed as a transitional period in the over-all Soviet-American relationship. The fear of mutual destruction through nuclear war, reinforced by crisis conflicts, imposed restraint on the use of force and averted direct military clashes between the two superpowers. Furthermore, it led to negotiations designed to limit the escalation of strategic weapons. Because of the complexity of Soviet-American relations in regard to the Vietnam War and the Middle East these areas of conflict have only been briefly mentioned in this chronology. The reader is referred to the following sources for information on these issues: U.S. Congress. Senate. Committee on Foreign Relations. Background Information Relating to Southeast Asia and Vietnam. (6th Revised Edition) 91st Congress. 2d Session. June 1970. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1970. 455 p. Mark, Clyde R. The West and the Soviet Union in the Middle East : A Chronology of Events Since World War II. June 2, 1971. Sl p. Multilith 71-148 F. (CRS Foreign Affairs Division) . A Summary of Events in the Middle East Since June 1967. January 30, 1970. 6 p. Multilith 70-36 FA. (LRS/FAD) -. Summary of Events in the Middle East in 1970. February 4, 1971. 17 p. Multilith 71-47 F. (CRS/FAD) Whelan, Joseph. The. Soviet Union and the Middle East : A Survey and Analysis. November 26, .1967. 101 p. Multilith F 271. (LRS/FAD) . The Soviet Union and the Arab-Israeli Crisis, 1970: A Brief Survey of Russia's Role in the Middle East and the Implications for the United States. July 13, 1970. 77 p. Multilith 70-181. (LRS/FAD) CRS-1 CRS-2 Although there was an improved Soviet-American relationship during the 1960's, each nation also continued to act according to its interests and the policies which served these interests best. At times these ran counter to the other's policies and interests. Clearly, the conflict of interests was not eliminated, yet the increased use of negotiations resulted in an expansion of cooperation and accommodation. I. Conflict and Crisis, 1960-1964 The first half of the 1960's was a period of competition, especially in the escalation and sophistication of the arms race. The increased nuclear capability of each nation, although achieving a certain strategic stabilization, restricted rather than enlarged the capability of each to affect minor, localized conflicts and added new inhibitions to the use of force. The early 1960's were years of crisis. The U-2 incident of 1960 and Khrushchev's attack on the United States wrecked the Paris Summit Conference and subsequently forced the cancellation of President Eisenhower's visit to the Soviet Union. At this time many observers predicted an exacerbation of the cold war spirit in Soviet diplomacy despite Khrushchev's insistence that Soviet policy would continue to follow the line of peaceful coexistence. The relaxation of tensions following the inauguration of President John Kennedy was shortlived. In 1961 Khrushchev renewed pressure. As in previous conflicts over the city, the Berlin crisis evolved into a political stalemate. The positions and objectives of the contending powers, both stated and unstated, and the proposals for resolving the problem, CRS-3 remained fundamentally unchanged. The only new factor introduced was the Soviet action in sealing off the West Berlin border and building the Berlin Wall. The latter has remained as a symbol of East-West hos iity. The Cuban missile crisis of 1962 was felt by many to be tie issue which brought the two superpowers closest to nuclear confrontation. This crisis was generated by the Soviet decision to emplace medium-range missiles in Cuba for the purpose of radically altering the balance of power in Russia's favor with one dramatic move. However,,once the Kremlin was fully aware of American power and determination to keep Soviet missiles out of Cuba, Premier Khrushchev withdrew rather than risk nuclear war. The humiliation suffered in the Kremlin by the withdrawal of missiles from Cuba may well have contributed ultimately to Khrushchev's overthrow in October 1964. Following the missile crisis, both nations appeared to comprehend fully the dangers of direct confrontations and came to realize that they would have to enter into an era of bilateral as well as multilateral negotiations. Consequently, efforts turned towards cooperation. Treaties regarding nuclear weapons were seriously negotiated, cultural and scientific agreements were implemented, and in 1964 a Consular Convention was signed. However, after President Kennedy's assassination in 1963 and Premier Khrushchev's overthrow in 1964, the somewhat precarious relationship of restraint found itself subjected to the strains of a dual change of leadership. CRS-4 II. On the Threshold of the Era of Negotiations, 1965-1970 The new Kremlin leaders appeared to be more conservative in their viows and conduct than thoir flamboyant prodocossor and genorally pro- jected a low-keyed impression of international ambitions. Nevertheless, although Sino-Soviet tensions reinforced this conservatism the Kremlin strove to extend its influence and power in the Mediterranean, Europe and Southeast Asia. Although the Johnson Administration continued with Kennedy policy initiatives, the U.S.'s entry into the Vietnam War and the Soviet Union's support of Hanoi with military equipment and supplies em- bittered the relations between the two superpowers and temporarily prevented fruitful negotiations, even in areas of mutual interest. At the end of the decade Vietnam remained a serious issue in Soviet-American.relations, but despite it some important agreements were concluded. Sino-Soviet tensions coupled with liberalization trends in Eastern Europe forced a reversal in Soviet policies in regard to inter-bloc affairs. The 1968 invasion and occupation of Czechoslovakia temporarily shattered the hopes of the Soviet Union's becoming a more cooperative member of the community of nations, stalled the ratification of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation ation Treaty, and postponed the possibility of a European Security Conference and a mutual balanced reduction of forces in Europe. The Soviet Union attempted to justify the invasion of Czechoslovakia by the Brezhnev Doctrine of "limited sovereignty" which declared that sovereignty and independence of Communist states are limited by the general interests of the socialist community; should any one member of the community endanger its own socialist/communist progress, the other members CRS-5 will be affected as well. Consequently, it is the duty and obligation of the other states to halt the threat to the socialist order, even by means of direct military intervention if necessary. The Doctrine clearly spelled out the Soviet Union's policies regarding its strategic position in Europe, and temporarily revived the mood of the cold war. However, once the initial shock of the Czech crisis subsided, a certain diplomatic stability was once again achieved. The Nuclear Non-Prolif eration Treaty was ratified, talks on strategic arms limitation (SALT) were begun and Soviet-American cooperation in many fields was expanded. An agreement regarding relations between Bonn and Moscow was negotiated. The Bonn-Moscow Pact of August 12, 1970, a direct result of German initiatives for peaceful coexistence with the East, was considered by some as a step towards reconciliation in a divided Europe, which might in the future lead to the resolution of old problems which had been a complicating factor in Soviet-American relations. CRS-6 i III. Chronology 1960 January 17: The White House announced that President Eisenhower would visit the Soviet Union from June 10-19. January 27: Soviet-American lend-lease debt negotiations begun in Washington on January 11 were broken off by the United States after Soviet Ambassador Menshikov demanded that they be broadened to include trade agreements and long-term credits. January 29: A delegation of five Soviet republic premiers and seven oblast (provincial) chairmen arrived in the United States for a 24-day visit, returning the visit by American Governors to the Soviet Union in 1959. February 10: The Soviet Union paid the United States $1,100,000 to settle World War II maritime claims totaling $8,S00,000. March 15: The first full-scale East-West disarmament conference convened in Geneva after two and one-half years suspension. May 5: Premier Khrushchev announced that the Soviet Union had shot down an American plane over the USSR. May 9: Secretary of State Herter admitted that the plane shot down in the USSR was an American U-2 aircraft and acknowledged that a program of aerial surveillance was necessary to protect the United States and the free world against surprise attack and enable them to maintain effective defenses. May 16: Khrushchev wrecked the U.S.-USSR summit conference in Paris in a bitter attack on President Eisenhower and the United States over the U-2 incident. At the opening session of the Paris summit conference, Premier Khrushchev delivered an hour long attack on the United States. He insisted on three conditions for the continuation of the conference: (1) the U.S. had to call off surveillance flights over the Soviet Union; (2) the U.S. had to apologize for the past acts of aggression; (3) and punish those responsible.
Recommended publications
  • Dartmouth Conf Program
    The Dartmouth Conference: The First 50 Years 1960—2010 Reminiscing on the Dartmouth Conference by Yevgeny Primakov T THE PEAK OF THE COLD WAR, and facilitating conditions conducive to A the Dartmouth Conference was one of economic interaction. the few diversions from the spirit of hostility The significance of the Dartmouth Confer- available to Soviet and American intellectuals, ence relates to the fact that throughout the who were keen, and able, to explore peace- cold war, no formal Soviet-American contact making initiatives. In fact, the Dartmouth had been consistently maintained, and that participants reported to huge gap was bridged by Moscow and Washington these meetings. on the progress of their The composition of discussion and, from participants was a pri- time to time, were even mary factor in the success instructed to “test the of those meetings, and it water” regarding ideas took some time before the put forward by their gov- negotiating teams were ernments. The Dartmouth shaped the right way. At meetings were also used first, in the early 1970s, to unfetter actions under- the teams had been led taken by the two countries by professionally quali- from a propagandist connotation and present fied citizens. From the Soviet Union, political them in a more genuine perspective. But the experts and researchers working for the Insti- crucial mission for these meetings was to tute of World Economy and International establish areas of concurring interests and to Relations and the Institute of U.S. and Cana- attempt to outline mutually acceptable solutions dian Studies, organizations closely linked to to the most acute problems: nuclear weapons Soviet policymaking circles, played key roles.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Jonathan Reid Hunt 2013
    Copyright by Jonathan Reid Hunt 2013 The Dissertation Committee for Jonathan Reid Hunt Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Into the Bargain: The Triumph and Tragedy of Nuclear Internationalism during the Mid-Cold War, 1958-1970 Committee: Henry W. Brands, Supervisor Mark A. Lawrence, Co-Supervisor Francis J. Gavin Bruce J. Hunt Charters S. Wynn Jeremi Suri Into the Bargain: The Triumph and Tragedy of Nuclear Internationalism during the mid-Cold War, 1958-1970 by Jonathan Reid Hunt, B.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December 2013 Dedication To my parents, Thomas and Laurie Hunt, and my brother, Tommy, whom I cherish, and whose unconditional support and passion for learning have lighted my path even when my candle burned low. Remember your humanity, and forget the rest. --Russell-Einstein Manifesto, 1955 Acknowledgements At this moment, I cannot help but think back to all those who made this work of scholarship possible. I am struck not only by how instrumental they have been, but how they have constantly made this journey as entertaining as it was challenging and rewarding. When I arrived in the Department of History at the University of Texas at Austin, I had only the faintest idea of what I wanted to study, and an even fainter appreciation for what academic history demanded. I was fortunate to find myself among a cohort of passionate fellow graduate students and under the tutelage of a faculty of warm, patient, and dedicated scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of Hotlines
    University of Birmingham The Soviet Use of the Moscow-Washington Hotline in the Six-Day War Simon, Eszter; Simon, Agnes DOI: 10.1080/14794012.2017.1337700 License: None: All rights reserved Document Version Peer reviewed version Citation for published version (Harvard): Simon, E & Simon, A 2017, 'The Soviet Use of the Moscow-Washington Hotline in the Six-Day War', Journal of Transatlantic Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 284-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794012.2017.1337700 Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal Publisher Rights Statement: Checked for eligibility: 03/06/2016. “This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Transatlantic Studies on [date of publication], available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/[Article DOI].” General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. •Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. •Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. •User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of ‘fair dealing’ under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) •Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • BULLETIN 61 Divisions on Your Front Could Fully Satisfy of an Armistice to Comrade GAO GANG in the Korean Army and Chinese Volunteer Troops the Needs of the Front
    COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT BULLETIN Issues 6 - 7 Woodrow Wilson International Center Winter 1995/1996 for Scholars, Washington, D.C. THE COLD WAR IN ASIA DRAFT VERSION 2 COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT BULLETIN The Cold War International History Project The Cold War International History Project was established at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars in Washington, D.C., in 1991 with the help of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. The project supports the full and prompt release of historical materials by governments on all sides of the Cold War, and seeks to disseminate new information and perspectives on Cold War history emerging from previously inaccessible sources on “the other side”—the former Communist bloc—through publications, fellowships, and scholarly meetings and conferences. The project is overseen by an advisory committee chaired by Prof. William Taubman (Amherst College) and consisting of Michael Beschloss; Dr. James Billington (Librarian of Congress); Prof. Warren I. Cohen (University of Maryland-Baltimore); Prof. John Lewis Gaddis (Ohio University-Athens); Dr. Samuel F. Wells, Jr. (Deputy Director, Woodrow Wilson Center); and Prof. Sharon Wolchik (George Washington University). Within the Wilson Center, CWIHP is under the Division of International Studies, headed by Ambassador Robert Hutchings, and is directed by Dr. James G. Hershberg. Readers are invited to submit articles, letters and Update items to the Bulletin. Publication of articles does not constitute CWIHP’s endorsement of authors’ views. Copies are available free upon request. Cold War International History Project Bulletin Issues 6-7 (Winter 1995/1996) Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars 1000 Jefferson Drive, SW Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Exchange and the Cold War: Raising the Iron Curtain
    CULTURAL EXCHANGE AND THE COLD WAR also by Yale Richmond Soviet-American Cultural Exchanges: Ripoff or Payoff? Hosting Soviet Visitors: A Handbook U.S.-Soviet Cultural Exchanges, 1958–1986: Who Wins? From Nyet to Da: Understanding the Russians From Da to Yes: Understanding the East Europeans Into Africa: Intercultural Insights (with Phyllis Gestrin) CULTURAL EXCHANGE& THE COLD WAR RAISING THE IRON CURTAIN yale richmond The Pennsylvania State University Press University Park, Pennsylvania Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Richmond, Yale. Cultural exchange and the Cold War : raising the iron curtain / Yale Richmond. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN --- (cloth : alk. paper) . United States—Relations—Soviet Union. Soviet Union—Relations—United States. Cold War. Cultural relations. I. Title. E .R .''—dc Copyright © The Pennsylvania State University All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America Published by The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA - It is the policy of The Pennsylvania State University Press to use acid-free paper. Publications on uncoated stock satisfy the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Material, ANSI Z.–. , who always wanted to know what their daddy did at the office. It was man who ended the Cold War in case you didn’t notice. It wasn’t weaponry, or technology, or armies, or campaigns. It was just man. — , The Secret Pilgrim CONTENTS Abbreviations and Acronyms Preface Acknowledgments Introduction Russia and the West The Moscow Youth Festival The Cultural Agreement Scholarly Exchanges Science and Technology Humanities and Social Sciences Moscow Think Tanks Forums Across Oceans Other NGO Exchanges Performing Arts Moved by the Movies Exhibitions—Seeing is Believing Hot Books in the Cold War The Pen Is Mightier .
    [Show full text]
  • When the Wall Came Down
    fonti Marc Dierikx and Sacha Zala (eds.) When the Wall Came Down The Perception of German Reunification in International Diplomatic Documents 1989–1990 International Editors of Diplomatic Documents President: Dr. Ilse Dorothee Pautsch, Akten zur Auswärtigen Politik der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Secretary General: Prof. Dr. Sacha Zala, Diplomatic Documents of Switzerland (Dodis) Members of the Bureau: Dr. Marc Dierikx, Huygens Institute for the History of the Netherlands Dr. Piotr Długołęcki, Polish Diplomatic Documents Dr. Michael Kennedy, Documents on Irish Foreign Policy Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Mueller, Außenpolitische Dokumente der Republik Österreich Dr. Stephen P. Randolph, Foreign Relations of the United States Prof. Dr. Patrick Salmon, Documents on British Policy Overseas When the Wall Came Down The Perception of German Reunification in International Diplomatic Documents 1989–1990 Edited by Marc Dierikx and Sacha Zala with the collaboration of Franziska Ruchti and Austria Maximilian Graf and Wolfgang Mueller Canada Greg Donaghy Germany Ilse Dorothee Pautsch Israel Louise Fischer Netherlands Marc Dierikx Poland Piotr Długołęcki and Włodzimierz Boradziej Russia Artem Rudnitskiy Switzerland Franziska Ruchti and Sacha Zala Turkey Beste Pehlivan Sun and İstem Cırcıroğlu United Kingdom Richard Smith USA Adam M. Howard Diplomatic Documents of Switzerland, Bern Leibniz Institute for Contemporary History, Munich–Berlin The Quaderni di Dodis are a series published by the research centre Diplomatic Documents of Switzerland (Dodis). For more information on the series see dodis.ch/quaderni. Series editor: Sacha Zala Editorial office: Dominik Matter Copy editing: Jan Szechi Visual concept & layout: Erik Dettwiler dewil.ch Advisory board: Prof. Dr. Madeleine Herren (President, University of Basel), Prof. Dr. Sacha Zala (Secretary, University of Bern), Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortifications at Tell El-Retaba*
    ASIAN AND AFRICAN STUDIES Volume 25/2016 Number 2 Published by the Institute of Oriental Studies, Slovak Academy of Sciences CONTENTS Articles ČERNÝ, Miroslav, HUDEC, Jozef Fortifications at Tell El-Retaba .................. 117 MAGDOLEN, Dušan The Ancient Egyptian Coffin in the Slovak Museum: The Fragments Nos. 4, 5 and 6 of the Exterior Surface of the Lid .............. 145 HUDÁKOVÁ, Ľubica, HUDEC, Jozef Fragment of a Ramesside Stela from Tell El-Retaba ................................................... 163 LIU, Yan The Rewriting of Jesus Christ: From the Saviour to the Proletarian ‒ A Comparative Study of Zhu Weizhi’s Jesus Christ and Jesus the Proletarian ................................. 173 VILHANOVÁ, Viera Encountering Islam and Christianity in sub-Saharan Africa: from Orality to Literacy and to the Rise of Historical Writing in the Kingdoms of Buganda and Bunyoro...................................................... 191 SORBY, Karol R. Un Security Council Resolution 242 – Source of Lasting Arab Bitterness ............. 213 LIĎÁK, Ján International Migration from Asia and Africa – Issues and Challengers for Europe ........................................................ 231 RÁCOVÁ, Anna Verbal Conjuncts in Slovak Romani .......... 249 MEOUAK, Mohamed Brief Notes on the Concepts of Lisān and Lugha within the Framework of the Medieval Berber Language through Some Examples ................................................... 266 Interview ZHANG CZIRÁKOVÁ, Daniela New Book about Marián Gálik was Published in Beijing ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reforming the Cold War State: Economic Thought, Internationalization, and the Politics of Soviet Reform, 1955-1985
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Reforming The Cold War State: Economic Thought, Internationalization, And The Politics Of Soviet Reform, 1955-1985. Yakov Feygin Feygin University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Economic History Commons, and the European History Commons Recommended Citation Feygin, Yakov Feygin, "Reforming The Cold War State: Economic Thought, Internationalization, And The Politics Of Soviet Reform, 1955-1985." (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2277. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2277 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2277 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reforming The Cold War State: Economic Thought, Internationalization, And The Politics Of Soviet Reform, 1955-1985. Abstract This dissertation explains how, as the USSR’s narrative of the Cold War shifted from the military-industrial competition envisioned by Stalin to Khrushchev’s “peaceful socioeconomic competition of the two systems,” economics began to tackle the challenge of transforming the Soviet economy from one focused on mobilization and production to one that could deliver well-being and abundance. Soviet economics changed from a field that only justified the state’s actions to a “science” whose practitioners could use their “expertise” to propose and critique domestic government policy. This opening
    [Show full text]
  • New Evidence on the Cold War in Asia
    COLD WAR INTERNATIONAL HISTORY PROJECT BULLETIN, ISSUE 12/13 243 New Evidence on the Cold War in Asia [Editors Note: With the following documents (and introductions), CWIHP continues its publication of critical new sources on the Cold War in Asia. In the first article, Vladislav Zubok (National Security Archive) introduces a remark- able set of conversations that took place between Soviet leader Nikita S. Khrushchev and his Chinese counterpart, Mao Zedong, in the summer of 1958 and the fall of 1959. The minutes of these conversations allow the reader to be a fly-on-the-wall in the wide-ranging and colorful discourse between the two communist giants at a pivotal moment in their relationshipduring the opening salvos of the Sino-Soviet split. The documents were obtained by Zubok and former CWIHP director David Wolff from the Volkogonov Papers at the Library of Congress (Washington, D.C.) in early 2000, following the opening of the papers to the public that January. Much like the rest of the Volkogonov Collection, these transcripts are fragments of a larger collection of documents on the communist summits, presumably located in the Presidential Archive of the Russian Federation in Moscow. Neither is the full set of the Russian records on the conversations between the two leaders available, nor has access been granted to all the supporting materials. Several important documents illuminating the context of these conversations, however, were published in previous issues of the CWIHP Bulletin, including, The Emerging Disputes Between Beijing and Moscow: Ten Newly Available Chinese Documents, 1956-1958, introduction, translations, and annotations by Zhang Shu Guang and Chen Jian, CWIHP Bulletin 6/7 (Winter 1995-96), pp.
    [Show full text]