Gene Silencing and DNA Methylation Processes Jerzy Paszkowski* and Steven a Whitham†
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
123 Gene silencing and DNA methylation processes Jerzy Paszkowski* and Steven A Whitham† Epigenetic gene silencing results from the inhibition of associated with the hypermethylation of transcribed or transcription or from posttranscriptional RNA degradation. coding sequences [2]. Hypermethylation can spread within DNA methylation is one of the most central and frequently promoter regions or within transcribed regions, but spreads discussed elements of gene silencing in both plants and to a lesser extent from promoter to adjacent transcribed mammals. Because DNA methylation has not been detected in regions and from transcribed to adjacent promoter regions. yeast, Drosophila or Caenorhabditis elegans, the standard DNA–DNA interactions of multicopy sequences have genetic workhorses, plants are important models for revealing been associated with methylation and gene silencing for the role of DNA methylation in the epigenetic regulation of some time. Recently, the use of constructs that produce genes in vivo. double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) transcripts that are homol- ogous to either promoter or coding regions has shown that Addresses RNA is an efficient trigger for methylation in association *Friedrich Miescher Institute, P.O. Box 2543, CH-4092 Basel, with gene silencing. Moreover, RNA-based viral and viroid Switzerland; e-mail: [email protected] systems confirm that RNA alone is sufficient to direct † Department of Plant Pathology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa methylation to homologous DNA sequences. 50011, USA; e-mail: [email protected] Current Opinion in Plant Biology 2001, 4:123–129 The correlation of methylation with both TGS and PTGS 1369-5266/01/$ — see front matter suggests that it may have direct roles in establishing or © 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. maintaining silenced states. Whether methylation is a cause or an effect of epigenetic silencing, it may provide Abbreviations bp basepair insight into common mechanisms that eukaryotes use to C cytosine identify and silence target loci. The general function of CAF1 CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY FACTOR1 DNA methylation might be conserved between plants and CG cytosine–guanosine animals, although there are differences in the composition CMT chromomethyltransferase of DNA methylating enzymes and their target sequences DDM1 DNA DEMETHYLATION1 DNMT1 DNA methyltransferase1 between these kingdoms. Studies of epigenetic regulation dsRNA double-stranded RNA in plants and mammals are yielding complementary results GFP green fluorescent protein that reveal the evolutionary conservation of epigenetic β GUS -glucuronidase mechanisms, including methylation [3]. HC-Pro helper component proteinase HDAC histone deacetylase IR inverted repeat In this review, we focus on selected aspects of TGS and MET1 METHYLTRANSFERASE1 PTGS that relate to the maintenance of gene silencing MOF MALES ABSENT ON THE FIRST and the functions of DNA methylation. For further details MOM Morpheus molecule NOSpro nopaline synthase promoter on plant and mammalian DNA methylation and gene nptII neomycin phosphotransferase II silencing more comprehensive recent reviews could be PAI PHOSPHORIBOSYLANTHRANILATE ISOMERASE consulted [1,2,4•,5•]. PPT phosphinothricin PSTVd potato spindle tuber viroid PTGS posttranscriptional gene silencing TGS and DNA methylation sgs1 suppressor of silencing1 In mammals, methylation of cytosine (C) residues is snoRNA small nucleolar RNA mainly confined to symmetric cytosine–guanosine (CG) TGS transcriptional gene silencing dinucleotides. Over two decades ago, this observation fostered the idea that C methylation provides a heritable Introduction epigenetic mark, which can be propagated during DNA The outcome of transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) and replication by copying the existing methylation pattern posttranscriptional gene silencing (PTGS) is a reduction in into the nascent DNA strand [5•]. CG sites are also methy- the accumulation of gene transcripts. This epigenetic lated in plant DNA; in addition, cytosines in the CNG silencing may persist over many cell divisions or plant gen- context, in which N can be any nucleotide, are used as erations. TGS is defined as an inhibition of transcription, methylation substrates [4•]. As in mammals, methylation whereas PTGS involves the posttranscriptional degradation marks in both the CG and the CNG symmetric sequence of RNA species but does not effect transcription rate [1]. contexts can easily be copied in plants. Closer inspection Recent studies indicate that TGS and PTGS are mecha- of methylation distribution has, however, revealed addi- nistically and probably functionally related because they tional modifications of cytosine residues that are not linked are correlated with some of the same events, including to guanosines, which provide sequence marks for faithful changes in DNA methylation. TGS is associated with the reproduction of methylation patterns [6]. Thus, the simple hypermethylation of promoter sequences, and PTGS is methylation copying mechanism, which is based on 124 Genome studies and molecular genetics hemimethylated templates, that results from DNA replication the absence of symmetrical methylation acceptor sites in does not always apply. its promoter. TGS of bar in the lines carrying the 271- silencer locus was associated with the methylation of In mammals, biochemical and cytological experiments non-symmetrical sites. When silenced bar lines were out- have provided evidence that DNA methyltransferase1 crossed to remove the 271-silencer locus, progeny carrying (DNMT1) is responsible for the maintenance of methy- the bar gene rapidly reverted to PPT resistance in the lation patterns [5•]. These experiments also showed that absence of the 271-silencer locus. Other studies using a DNMT3a and DNMT3b are essential for changing wild-type 35S promoter have shown that the silenced state methylation patterns by de novo methylation [7]. Plants is maintained if the 271-silencer locus is segregated away have a larger variety of DNA methyltransferases at their from the transgene [15]. Therefore, initiation of TGS disposal than do animals [4•]. In addition to homologues of does not require methylation at symmetric sites but the mammalian DNMT1, DNMT3a and DNMT3b, maintenance of stable silencing may rely on it. Arabidopsis has a set of genes encoding a plant-specific group of methyltransferases that contain a chromodomain The importance of symmetric DNA methylation for the motif, the chromomethyltransferases (CMTs) [8]. maintenance of TGS was further supported by studies of Biochemical assays to confirm the activities of plant Arabidopsis mutants with reduced methylation levels. In methyltransferase are still needed. Nevertheless, the contrast to mammals, in which loss of DNMT1 causes results of genetic experiments suggest that the major embryonic lethality, plants tolerate mutations or transgenic Arabidopsis methyltransferase, METHYLTRANSFER- approaches that drastically alter the level and distribution ASE1 (MET1) which is similar to DMNT1, is involved in of chromosomal methylation [4•,9]. Plants carrying met1 maintaining methylation at CG sites, whereas CMT could mutations or in which MET1 gene function has been inhib- be responsible for CNG methylation [4•,9,10]. This speci- ited by antisense RNA develop almost normally and set ficity was recently confirmed by analysis of the preferential seeds. Phenotypic abnormalities in such plants accumulate loss of distinct methylation types in plants impaired in only as a result of successive inbreeding [16]. Similar either MET1 or CMT activity. hypomethylation and gradual accumulation of phenotypic abnormalities are observed in Arabidopsis mutants of the Whether asymmetric methylation is significant and how its DNA DEMETHYLATION1 (DDM1) gene [17•], which patterns are maintained remain unanswered questions. encodes a plant homologue of the SWI2/SNF2 protein Inverted chromosomal repeats are the preferred targets for [18••], a component of chromatin remodeling complexes. de novo methylation [10–12], but whether the methylation This finding suggests that proteins involved in changes of of inverted repeats (IRs) involves DNA hairpin structures chromatin structure are required to ensure the correct levels or is mediated by dsRNA transcripts derived from IR and allocation of methylation. structures is still under dispute (Figure 1). In either case, methylated IRs trigger the methylation of homologous Such a role for chromatin remodeling is unexpected con- sequences in ectopic positions. Remarkably, when the trig- sidering that the biochemical and cytological data derived gering IR is removed, the methylation of the target from mammalian systems strongly suggest that DNMT1 sequences is maintained for several generations, but at reproduces methylation patterns instantaneously during reduced levels and almost entirely in cytosines in symmetric DNA replication using hemimethylated templates. Why sites [10]. These findings suggest that asymmetric methy- plants should require an additional factor(s), which prob- lation is inefficiently maintained. Thus, if methylation of ably reshapes chromatin structure, to establish DNA does indeed contribute to the stability and/or heri- methylation patterns is intriguing. Is it possible that fol- tability of TGS, only modifications at CG and/or CNG are lowing DNA replication chromatin first acquires (i.e. key to this process. replicates) a structure that appropriately directs and cor- rectly distributes methylation? Histone assembly and This conclusion concurs