DOCSLIB.ORG

Rogue Valley Integrated Community Wildfire Protection Plan June 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rogue Valley Integrated Community Wildfire Protection Plan June 2017 Rogue Valley Integrated Community Wildfire Protection Plan June 2017 Reducing the risk of wildfire to life, property, and natural resources in the Rogue Valley by encouraging coordination among public agencies, community organizations, private landowners, and the public to increase their awareness of, and responsibility for, fire issues. Submitted By ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, many thanks to Jackson and Josephine County Commissioners Rick Dyer, Bob Strosser, Colleen Roberts, Simon Hare, Lilly Morgan and Dan DeYoung for recognizing the value and importance of this effort. In addition, countless individuals have committed time, energy and passion into the Rogue Valley Integrated Community Wildfire Protection Plan. Any outcomes in reducing the risk to wildfire come in no small part because of their ongoing efforts. Many thanks to all the members of the many committees, and to the agency and fire district representatives who have dedicated so much to this update effort: Current Executive Team Members: Lang Johnson, Grants Pass Department of Public Tyler McCarty, Oregon Department of Forestry Safety – Fire Rescue Dave Larson, Oregon Department of Forestry Brian Fish, Medford Fire-Rescue Joel Benton, Jackson County Lee Winslow, Oregon Department of Forestry Simon Hare, Josephine County Other Important Participants: Jim Wolf Leah Harper, Josephine County Austin Prince, Rural Metro Fire Brian Ballou, Oregon Department of Forestry Karl Witz, Oregon Department of Forestry Dan Thorpe, Oregon Department of Forestry Shelly Hoffer, Oregon Department of Forestry Rick Dryer, Oregon Department of Forestry Phil Turnbull, Rural Metro Fire Greg Alexander, Oregon Department of Forestry Mike Kuntz, Applegate/Williams Fire Neil Benson John Karns, City of Ashland George McKinley, SOFRC Danny Jordan, Jackson County Rogue Valley Fire Prevention Cooperative members Herb Johnson, Oregon Department of Forestry Rogue Valley Fire Chiefs Association members Matt Krunglevich, Oregon Department of Forestry Rogue Valley Integrated Community Wildfire Protection Plan June 2017 Core Team Members: John Patterson, Jackson County Fire District 3 Syndi Zerr, US Forest Service Chris Chambers, Ashland Fire Eric Hensel, US Forest Service Karim Naguib, Jackson County GIS Jena Volpe, Bureau of Land Management Kelly Madding, Jackson County Planning Max Bennett, OSU Extension Service Mike McLaughlin, Applegate Valley RFPD #9 Shayne Maxwell, Foots Creek Community James Black, Josephine County Planning Alison Lerch, Ashland Fire John O'Connor, Oregon Department of Forestry Kerry Metlen, The Nature Conservancy Herb Johnson, Oregon Department of Forestry Sean Hendrix, Forest Restoration Collaborative Jeremy Delack, Bureau of Land Management Mark Shay, Rural Metro Fire Rob Budge, US Forest Service Dayne Barron, Bureau of Land Management Over the past 15 years, both Jackson and Josephine County response agencies and citizens have worked very hard on the implementation of their fire plans. Many great people worked many hours on many great committees. The fire planning structure has changed over the years, and although the final structure moving forward has not yet been finalized, this should not reduce the importance of all of the steps and changes along the way. Thanks to Wildland Fire Associates who worked tirelessly to contribute to the Rogue Valley Integrated Community Wildfire Protection Plan, including Victoria Amato, SWCA Environmental Consultants for your dedication to the development of a plan that doesn’t fit the typical mold. We would like to express our personal gratitude to the people who spent many, many hours on the phone, in meetings and traveling around Jackson and Josephine Counties with us, in so many ways you all inspired this plan, exemplified what a strong, collaborative process means, and are helping to make this effort a long-term success. While we can’t possibly list them all by name, our greatest thanks go to the citizens who attend community meetings and trainings, create defensible space around their property, test or replace their smoke alarms annually, move wood piles away from their homes, convince friends and neighbors that preparing for fire is a good idea, and for all of the other efforts they do on a regular basis to promote fire safety. Sara Rubrecht and Jenny Hall Jackson and Josephine County Emergency Managers Rogue Valley Integrated Community Wildfire Protection Plan June 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THE CURRENT WILDFIRE SITUATION Wildfire is a significant threat to rural and urban communities across the United States. In the last few years, most western states have experienced the largest wildfires in their histories, with catastrophic destruction of homes, property, and natural resources. The combination of increasing development in or near wildlands, the accumulation of wildland fuels, dry fire seasons, and rugged terrain has resulted in significant wildfire risk to communities in or near the Wildland Urban Interface (WUI). The cost to suppress wildfires across the nation typically exceeds $1 billion annually. Wildfire is not a new phenomenon in southwestern Oregon; it has played a significant role in shaping ecosystems within the Rogue Valley for centuries. Prior to the 20th Century, low- to mixed-severity fires played a large role in most dry forest types of the area. In the early 1900s, federal fire policy focused on immediate suppression of wildfire. Many areas in the region have missed two to five fire cycles because of this policy of fire exclusion, coupled with other land management practices. In general, forest diversity has been reduced at both the landscape and stand scales; as a result, both young and old forests are increasingly at risk of experiencing fires of greater intensity than they have in the past. Even in old-growth stands, fire exclusion and historic and existing land management practices have led to overly dense forests. With changing climates, these degraded forest conditions become further exacerbated, resulting in potentially severe and catastrophic wildfires. These large and intense wildfires can damage watersheds and cause significant erosion and degradation of water quality. Sensitive species habitat can be damaged or destroyed, or overrun with invasive species. The economic loss from a large, severe wildfire can be enormous, as tourism and recreational values are affected, and commercial timber stands are damaged or destroyed. Additionally, wildfire smoke causes significant safety and health issues to individuals located in the WUI and in urban areas, with some individuals requiring medical treatment. THE NEED FOR A COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Southwestern Oregon has the most complex system of forestland ownership in the nation. Often referred to as a checkerboard pattern, lands of varying ownership are intermingled across the region. This ownership pattern puts the responsibility to appropriately manage the land on everyone, from private citizens to timber companies to federal agencies; no one person or agency can do it alone. Rogue Valley Integrated Community Wildfire Protection Plan June 2017 In 2003, Congress passed the federal Healthy Forests Restoration Act (HFRA), which encourages local communities to collaborate with federal land managers to develop comprehensive fuels reduction strategies. This is accomplished through the creation of a Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). A CWPP provides a set of guiding principles for local wildfire planning. It is developed collaboratively with all parties involved in managing lands within the geographical boundaries specified in the plan, and provides a framework for landowners and managers to use during the wildfire planning process. Use of the guiding principles from the CWPP by all parties will result in forest health and wildfire risk reduction steps being applied consistently on all lands, regardless of ownership. Although federal land managers are not bound by the results of CWPP collaboration, the federal government’s ownership of a vast portion of the forests in both Jackson and Josephine counties means that any plan without their valuable input will struggle to achieve meaningful control over wildfires. The HFRA also offers federal land managers tools to streamline the federal land management process and expedite management projects. FIRE PLANNING ORIGINS Jackson and Josephine counties have a long history of wildfire planning with the greatest impetus following the 2002 Biscuit Fire, which burned approximately 500,000 acres over nearly three months, and cost over $150 million to suppress. In the past 15 years, more than 170 agencies, organizations, and partners in Jackson and Josephine counties have embraced national wildfire protection practices and policies, and have invested countless hours to reduce the risk of wildfire to southwestern Oregon communities. This Rogue Valley Integrated Community Wildfire Protection Plan (RVIFP) was developed in 2016-2017 to update the Jackson County and the Josephine County integrated fire plans, which were originally developed in 2006 and 2005, respectively. Both counties, as well as many other agencies, organizations, and residents joined together to develop the RVIFP. This larger scale planning effort increases the level of coordination and cooperation among stakeholders, which can lead to broader and more efficient wildfire risk mitigation measures. Rogue Valley Integrated Community Wildfire Protection Plan June 2017 THE POLICY FRAMEWORK Numerous federal, state, and local rules, ordinances,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CDFG Natural Communities List
    Department of Fish and Game Biogeographic Data Branch The Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program List of California Terrestrial Natural Communities Recognized by The California Natural Diversity Database September 2003 Edition Introduction: This document supersedes all other lists of terrestrial natural communities developed by the Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). It is based on the classification put forth in “A Manual of California Vegetation” (Sawyer and Keeler-Wolf 1995 and upcoming new edition). However, it is structured to be compatible with previous CNDDB lists (e.g., Holland 1986). For those familiar with the Holland numerical coding system you will see a general similarity in the upper levels of the hierarchy. You will also see a greater detail at the lower levels of the hierarchy. The numbering system has been modified to incorporate this richer detail. Decimal points have been added to separate major groupings and two additional digits have been added to encompass the finest hierarchal detail. One of the objectives of the Manual of California Vegetation (MCV) was to apply a uniform hierarchical structure to the State’s vegetation types. Quantifiable classification rules were established to define the major floristic groups, called alliances and associations in the National Vegetation Classification (Grossman et al. 1998). In this document, the alliance level is denoted in the center triplet of the coding system and the associations in the right hand pair of numbers to the left of the final decimal. The numbers of the alliance in the center triplet attempt to denote relationships in floristic similarity. For example, the Chamise-Eastwood Manzanita alliance (37.106.00) is more closely related to the Chamise- Cupleaf Ceanothus alliance (37.105.00) than it is to the Chaparral Whitethorn alliance (37.205.00).
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Vegetation of Central Southwest Oregon, Based on GLO
    HISTORICAL VEGETATION OF CENTRAL SOUTHWEST OREGON, BASED ON GLO SURVEY NOTES Final Report to USDI BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Medford District October 31, 2011 By O. Eugene Hickman and John A. Christy Consulting Rangeland Ecologist Oregon Biodiversity Information Center Retired, USDA - NRCS Portland State University 61851 Dobbin Road PSU – INR, P.O. Box 751 Bend, Oregon 97702 Portland, Oregon 97207-0751 (541, 312-2512) (503, 725-9953) [email protected] [email protected] Suggested citation: Hickman, O. Eugene and John A. Christy. 2011. Historical Vegetation of Central Southwest Oregon Based on GLO Survey Notes. Final Report to USDI Bureau of Land Management. Medford District, Oregon. 124 pp. ______________________________________________________________________________ 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 SW OREGON PRE-GLO SURVEY HISTORY ....................................................................................................................... 7 THE GENERAL LAND OFFICE, ITS FUNCTION AND HISTORY...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Heteromeles Arbutifolia (Lindl.) M. Roemer NRCS CODE: Subfamily: Maloideae Family: Rosaceae (HEAR5) Photos: A
    I. SPECIES Heteromeles arbutifolia (Lindl.) M. Roemer NRCS CODE: Subfamily: Maloideae Family: Rosaceae (HEAR5) photos: A. Montalvo Order: Rosales Subclass: Rosidae Class: Magnoliopsida Fruits (pomes) in late fall and winter. A. Subspecific taxa None recognized by Phipps (2012, 2016) in Jepson Manual or Jepson e-Flora. B. Synonyms Photinia arbutifolia (Ait.) Lindl.; Crataegus arbutifolia Ait. (McMinn 1939) Heteromeles (Lindl.) M. Roemer arbutifolia var. arbutifolia ; H. a. var. cerina (Jeps.) E. Murray; H. a. var. macrocarpa (Munz) Munz; H. salicifolia (C. Presl) Abrams (Phipps 2016) (but see I. F. Taxonomic issues). C. Common name toyon, California Christmas berry, California-holly (Painter 2016); Christmas berry (CalFlora 2016). D. Taxonomic relationships Phylogenetic analyses based on molecular and morphological data confirm thatPhotinia is the most closely related genus (Guo et al. 2011). Photinia differs in having 20 stamens, fused carpels, and stone cells in the testa as well as occurring in summer-wet environments (Phipps 1992). E. Related taxa in region None. There is only one species of Heteromeles. The closely related Photinia is primarily tropical (Meyer 2008) and not in California. Toyon's taxonomic stability may be in part related to its reproductive mode (Wells 1969). F. Taxonomic issues The three varieties of H. arbutifolia listed above in cell I. B. are currently recognized in the USDA PLANTS (2016) database. G. Other One of the most widely distributed California shrubs. Also widely planted and well-known for its bright red fruits in winter. McMinn (1939) noted it had been planted widely in parks and gardens since about 1914. From the Greek words 'heter' for different and 'malus' for apple (Munz 1974).
    [Show full text]
  • Low Water Arboretum All Stars
    LOW-WATER ARBORETUM OF THE ONE HUNDRED ARBORETUM ALL-STARS, THIS LIST INCLUDES THOSE WITH THE LOWEST WATER NEEDS Fragrant yellow flowers add color to the winter garden; very Acacia boormanii adaptable and hardy, grows best in well-drained soils; heat and Snowy River wattle drought tolerant. Acca sellowiana Attractive spring flowers are edible and sweet; large green berries have a pineapple-like flavor; can be used as hedging or (Feijoa sellowiana) as a screen; attracts hummingbirds. pineapple guava California native plant; known for its smooth, wine-red bark; Arctostaphylos densiflora one of the few manzanitas that tolerates our clay-loam soils; ‘Howard McMinn’ attracts hummingbirds and beneficial insects. Vine Hill manzanita Aristolochia californica California native plant; leaves provide food for pipevine swallowtail butterfly larvae; versatile plant that can be used as a California pipevine climbing vine or a groundcover. Bulbine frutescens Small, evergreen perennial is a wonderful addition to dry perennial borders with its long-blooming spikes of delicate, Cape balsam star-shaped yellow flowers; fleshy, bright green foliage adds a sculptural element to the garden; tolerates drought and poor soils. ‘Violaceus’ Rosy-purple “bottlebrush” flowers bloom in early winter and Callistemon spring, and sporadically year round; medium to large evergreen purple bottlebrush shrub that is tough and adaptable; grows best in full sun and tolerates infrequent watering; attracts hummingbirds and beneficial insects. California native plant; best small ceanothus for Central Valley Ceanothus maritimus gardens; clusters of dark-violet flowers bloom in spring; attracts ‘Valley Violet’ beneficial insects. valley violet maritime ceanothus Cercis occidentalis California native plant; early spring bloom before leaves appear; attractive reddish seed pods in summer; new stems, cut in western redbud winter, are used to add color to Native American baskets; attracts beneficial insects.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FLORISTICS of the CALIFORNIA ISLANDS Peter H
    THE FLORISTICS OF THE CALIFORNIA ISLANDS Peter H. Raven Stanford University The Southern California Islands, with their many endemic spe­ cies of plants and animals, have long attracted the attention of biologists. This archipelago consists of two groups of islands: the Northern Channel Islands and the Southern Channel Islands. The first group is composed of San Miguel, Santa Rosa, Santa Cruz, and Anacapa islands; the greatest water gap between these four is about 6 miles, and the distance of the nearest, Anacapa, from the mainland only about 13 miles. In the southern group there are also four islands: San Clemente, Santa Catalina, Santa Bar­ bara, and San Nicolas. These are much more widely scattered than the islands of the northern group; the shortest distance be­ tween them is the 21 miles separating the islands of San Clemente and Santa Catalina, and the nearest island to the mainland is Santa Catalina, some 20 miles off shore. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the complex floristics of the vascular plants found on this group of islands, and this will be done from three points of view. First will be considered the numbers of species of vascular plants found on each island, then the endemics of these islands, and finally the relationship between the island and mainland localities for these plants. By critically evaluating the accounts of Southern California island plants found in the published works of Eastwood (1941), Mill¬ spaugh and Nuttall (1923), Munz (1959), and Raven (1963), one can derive a reasonably accurate account of the plants of the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E - Plants and Wildlife
    Appendix E - Plants and Wildlife Blue Ridge NWR Plant Lists Table E-15. Blue Ridge NWR – Plants Scientific Name Common Name Family Abies concolor white fir Pinaceae Adenostoma fasciculatum chamise Rosaceae Amsinckia sp. fiddleneck Boraginaceae Arctostaphylos patula greenleaf manzanita Ericaceae Arctostaphylos viscida viscid manzanita Ericaceae Asclepias californica California milkweed Apocynaceae Asclepias fascicularis narrow-leaf milkweed Apocynaceae Bromus diandrus ripgut grass Poaceae Bromus hordeaceus soft chess Poaceae Bromus madritensis subsp. rubens red brome Poaceae Calocedrus decurrens California incense-cedar Cupressaceae Ceanothus leucodermis chaparral whitethorn Rhamnaceae Cercocarpus betuloides birch-leaved cercocarpus Rosaceae Chamaebatia foliolosa mountain misery Rosaceae Chlorogalum pomeridianum wavy-leaved soap-plant Agavaceae Cirsium sp. thistle Asteraceae Clarkia sp. clarkia Onagraceae Cynosurus echinatus bristly dogtail grass Poaceae Dendromecon rigida bush poppy Papaveraceae Dudleya sp. dudleya Crassulaceae Boraginaceae Eriodictyon californicum California yerba santa [Hydrophyllaceae] Eriogonum sp. wild buckwheat Polygonaceae Frangula californica subsp. cuspidata California coffee-berry Rhamnaceae Juncus sp. rush Juncaceae Lonicera sp. honeysuckle Caprifoliaceae Marah fabacea California man-root Cucurbitaceae Phrymaceae Mimulus viscidus viscid monkeyflower [Scrophulariaceae] Orobanche sp. broomrape Orobanchaceae Pinus lambertiana sugar pine Pinaceae Pinus ponderosa ponderosa pine Pinaceae Populus fremontii Fremont’s
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County
    DRAFT VEGETATION COMMUNITIES OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY Based on “Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California” prepared by Robert F. Holland, Ph.D. for State of California, The Resources Agency, Department of Fish and Game (October 1986) Codes revised by Thomas Oberbauer (February 1996) Revised and expanded by Meghan Kelly (August 2006) Further revised and reorganized by Jeremy Buegge (March 2008) March 2008 Suggested citation: Oberbauer, Thomas, Meghan Kelly, and Jeremy Buegge. March 2008. Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County. Based on “Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California”, Robert F. Holland, Ph.D., October 1986. March 2008 Draft Vegetation Communities of San Diego County Introduction San Diego’s vegetation communities owe their diversity to the wide range of soil and climatic conditions found in the County. The County encompasses desert, mountainous and coastal conditions over a wide range of elevation, precipitation and temperature changes. These conditions provide niches for endemic species and a wide range of vegetation communities. San Diego County is home to over 200 plant and animal species that are federally listed as rare, endangered, or threatened. The preservation of this diversity of species and habitats is important for the health of ecosystem functions, and their economic and intrinsic values. In order to effectively classify the wide variety of vegetation communities found here, the framework developed by Robert Holland in 1986 has been added to and customized for San Diego County. To supplement the original Holland Code, additions were made by Thomas Oberbauer in 1996 to account for unique habitats found in San Diego and to account for artificial habitat features (i.e., 10,000 series).
    [Show full text]
  • Plants for a 'Sustainable” -- Low Maintenance – Garden and Landscape in Arroyo Grande
    PLANTS FOR A ‘SUSTAINABLE” -- LOW MAINTENANCE – GARDEN AND LANDSCAPE IN ARROYO GRANDE Low water use, minimal fertilizer needs, no special care Large Trees -- Cedrus libanii atlantica ‘Glauca’ BLUE ATLAS CEDAR Cedrus deodara DEODAR CEDAR Cinnamomum camphora CAMPHOR Gingko biloba GINGKO Pinus canariensis CANARY ISLAND PINE Pinus pinea ITALIAN STONE PINE Pinus sabiniana GRAY PINE Pinus torreyana TORREY PINE Quercus ilex HOLLY OAK Quercus suber CORK OAK Medium Trees -- Allocasuarina verticillata SHE-OAK Arbutus ‘Marina’ HYBRID STRAWBERRY TREE Brachychiton populneus KURRAJONG, AUSTRALIAN BOTTLE TREE Brahea armata BLUE HESPER PALM Butia capitata PINDO PALM Eucalyptus nicholii PEPPERMINT GUM Eucalyptus polyanthemos SILVER DOLLAR GUM Calocedrus decurrens INCENSE CEDAR Cupressus arizonica ARIZONA CYPRESS Cupressus forbesii TECATE CYPRESS Geijera parviflora AUSTRALIAN WILLOW Gleditsia triacanthos inermis THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST Juniperus scopulorum ‘Tolleson’s Blue Weeping’ BLUE WEEPING JUNIPER Melaleuca linariifolia FLAXLEAF PAPERBARK Metrosideros excelsus NEW ZEALAND CHRISTMAS TREE Olea europaea OLIVE (only fruitless cultivars such as ‘Majestic Beauty’, ‘Wilsoni’) Pinus halepensis ALEPPO PINE Pistacia chinensis CHINESE PISTACHE Quercus chrysolepis CANYON LIVE OAK Sequoiadendron giganteum GIANT REDWOOD © Copyright Joe Seals 2009 Small Trees Acacia baileyana BAILEY’S ACACIA Acacia pendula WEEPING MYALL Celtis australis EUROPEAN HACKBERRY x Chiltalpa tashkentensis CHILTALPA Cordyline australis CABBAGE PALM Cotinus coggygria SMOKE TREE Eucalyptus
    [Show full text]
  • In Forest Management Presented on ;14L-2 3
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF J. Edward Dealy for the degree ofDoctor of Philosophy in Forest Management presented on ;14L-23; /2 Title: ECOLOGY OF CURLLEAF MOUNTAIN-MAHOGANY (CERCOCARPtJS LEDIFOLIUS NUTT.) IN EASTERN OREGON AND ADJAC-NT AREAJJ Abstract approved: signature redacted for privacy. Dr. Richard K. Hermann C ercocarpus ledifolius (curlleaf mountain- mahogany),a small, hardwood evergreen tree, was studied to provide informationon germination and initial seedling growth characteristics, and the species' relationship to its environment.and associated vegetation. Exceptional germination for this species resulted from botha wet cold treatment at 4°C for 170 days (88 percent), and a 15-minute soak in a 30 percent solution of H202 (64 percent).Total and partial embryo excision indicated two possible deterrents to germination: mechanical impedance by the seed coat or a gas diffusion block by the membrane surrounding the embryo.The latter was concluded to be the most likely deterrent. Planting techniques must provide for seed coat deterioration by fall seeding (which allows moist winter conditions to do this)or by a brief, strong chemical treatment before spring planting. A pronounced specialization was demonstrated for rapid root growth in relation to top growth of seedlings for at least 120 days following germination.Under optimum laboratory conditions, the six most vigorous seedlings extended roots an average 1. 13 m in 120 days, but developed only 4 cm2 of leaf area and 2. 35 cm of shoot height, indicating a high potential for re-establishment of natural stands after decimation by fire or logging, or in the face of grass and shrub competition.Seedling stem diameter immediately above the root crown was an indicator of root vigor.Seedlings with the largest diameter stems were deepest rooted.
    [Show full text]
  • Alluvial Scrub Vegetation of Southern California, a Focus on the Santa Ana River Watershed in Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, California
    Alluvial Scrub Vegetation of Southern California, A Focus on the Santa Ana River Watershed In Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, California By Jennifer Buck-Diaz and Julie M. Evens California Native Plant Society, Vegetation Program 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 In cooperation with Arlee Montalvo Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District (RCRCD) 4500 Glenwood Drive, Bldg. A Riverside, CA 92501 September 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Background and Standards .......................................................................................................... 1 Table 1. Classification of Vegetation: Example Hierarchy .................................................... 2 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Study Area ................................................................................................................................3 Field Sampling ..........................................................................................................................3 Figure 1. Study area map illustrating new alluvial scrub surveys.......................................... 4 Figure 2. Study area map of both new and compiled alluvial scrub surveys. ....................... 5 Table 2. Environmental Variables ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Availabilitytable 2014.Xlsx
    2014 AVAILABILITY LIST PO Box 2739 Avalon, CA 90704 [email protected] Phn: 310.510.1299 ext 236 Plant Name Common Name Cont Price Qty Abronia maritima Red sand verbena 1 gal $10.00 6 Abronia maritima Red sand verbena 1 tpot $10.00 2 Acacia spp Green wattle 5 gal $22.00 7 Achillea millefolium Yarrow 2" $3.00 1778 Achillea millefolium Yarrow 2 gal $14.00 7 Acmispon argophyllus var. argenteus Silver lotus SC7 $3.00 256 Acmispon argophyllus var. argenteus Silver lotus D16 $3.75 344 Acmispon argophyllus var. argenteus Silver lotus 1 tpot $10.00 31 Acmispon grandiflorus Large‐flowered lotus 1 gal $12.00 3 Acmispon grandiflorus Large‐flowered lotus 2 tpot $18.00 4 Acmispon grandiflorus Large‐flowered lotus 5 gal $30.00 3 Adenostoma fasciculatum Chamise D60 $9.00 2 Adenostoma fasciculatum Chamise 15 gal $80.00 1 Aloe ciliaris Climbing aloe 1 gal $10.00 8 Anemopsis californica Yerba mansa 1 gal $10.00 14 Anemopsis californica Yerba mansa 2 gal $14.00 8 Arctostaphylos catalinae Santa Catalina Island manzanita D16 $7.00 16 Arctostaphylos catalinae Santa Catalina Island manzanita D60 $11.00 124 Arctostaphylos catalinae Santa Catalina Island manzanita 1 tpot $14.00 12 Arctostaphylos catalinae Santa Catalina Island manzanita 2 gal $25.00 1 Arctostaphylos catalinae Santa Catalina Island manzanita 5 gal $45.00 1 Arctostaphylos catalinae Santa Catalina Island manzanita 5 gal $45.00 6 Artemisia californica Coastal sagebrush 2" $3.00 600 Artemisia californica Coastal sagebrush SC7 $3.00 510 Artemisia californica Coastal sagebrush D16 $5.00 1228 Artemisia californica Coastal sagebrush D60 $9.00 201 Artemisia californica Coastal sagebrush 1 gal $10.00 1 Asclepias fascicularis Narrow leaf milkweed 2 gal $14.00 35 Astragalus trichopodus var.
    [Show full text]
  • Cercocarpus Betuloides Torrey & A. Gray Var. Betuloides, BIRCH-LEAF
    Cercocarpus betuloides Torrey & A. Gray var. betuloides, BIRCH-LEAF MOUNTAIN MAHOGANY. Shrub, ± evergreen, sclerophyllous, principal branches spreading and ascending, in range 150−500 cm tall; shoots exhibiting long short-short shoot organization with ascending, leathery leaves and inflorescences clustered on short shoots, each short shoot having many close, projecting bud scale scars; bark dull gray, smooth. Stems: cylindric, 2 mm diameter (of short shoots), reddish or reddish brown when young, gray- villous to gray-tomentose, aging with gray, glabrous and glaucous bark. Leaves: helically alternate, simple, petiolate, with stipules; stipules 2, broadly attached to base of petiole, asymmetrically ovate or oblanceolate to ± oblong, 2.5−8 × 1.8−4 mm, thin, light green to light greenish yellow (paler on thin margins and darker at base and ± along midvein) aging coppery brown, deciduous or with some persistent tissue as petiole wings, upper surface tomentose at base and along midvein, lower surface sparsely tomentose; petiole cylindric, 1−12 mm long, densely short-tomentose initially with white hairs aging brownish; blade broadly ovate to obovate or elliptic to rhombic, 10–65 × 8–45 mm, flat becoming cupped or curled under (not fully revolute), broadly tapered to rounded at base, regularly short- dentate to short-serrate with short point along upper 1/3 to 3/4 on margins, when inrolled and concealing teeth appearing entire or low-crenate, obtuse to rounded at tip, conspicuously pinnately veined with principal veins sunken on upper surface and raised on lower surface, the lateral veins mostly in 3−9 pairs, straight, and always ending in a reddish point (mucro), initially tomentose, upper surface becoming glabrescent and glossy or dull dark green, lower surface light green and whitish tomentose aging grayish tomentose.
    [Show full text]