DOCSLIB.ORG

7338-252 / I-95 Nerops Tech Memo 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
7338-252 / I-95 Nerops Tech Memo 1 Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study Appendices This report includes three appendices: Appendix A. Project Steering Committee and Contact Information Appendix B. Interviews, Meetings and Outreach Appendix C. Resource List I-95 Corridor Coalition A-1 Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study Appendix A: Project Steering Committee The project steering committee for the Northeast Rail Operations Study included the following representatives of I-95 Corridor Coalition member agencies: • Steve Slavick, New York State Department of Transportation, Lead Role • Robert Elder, Maine Department of Transportation • Christopher “Kit” Morgan, New Hampshire Department of Transportation • Steve Devine, Rhode Island Department of Transportation • Thomas Cahir, Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation • Carmine Trotta, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Charlie Miller, Vermont Agency of Transportation For information regarding this project, please contact: • Marygrace Parker Freight, Mobility, Safety & Security Coordinator I-95 Corridor Coalition E-mail: [email protected] • James Brogan Consultant Project Manager for NEROps Phase I Cambridge Systematics, Inc. E-mail: [email protected] • Brian ten Siethoff Consultant Project Manager for NEROps Phase II Cambridge Systematics, Inc. E-mail: [email protected] A-2 I-95 Corridor Coalition Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study Appendix B: Interviews, Meetings and Outreach The Northeast Rail Operations Study involved extensive outreach to stakeholders in the Northeast U.S., including the following: List of Interviewees Connecticut • Drew Galloway, Amtrak • Lyle Wray, Capitol Region Council of Governments • Mario Marrero, Capitol Region Council of Governments • Carmine Trotta, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Robert Pettinicchi, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Ned Hurle, Connecticut Department of Transportation • James Andrini, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Charles S. Barone, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Peter Labouliere, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Bob Hammersley, Connecticut Department of Transportation • David Head, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Thomas Cheeseman, Connecticut Public Transportation Commission • Derek Carpenter, Connecticut Public Transportation Commission • Sam Gold, Council of Governments of the Central Naugatuck Valley • Tom Dubno, Gateway Terminal • Tim Brennan, Pioneer Valley Planning Commission • Tim Doherty, Pioneer Valley Planning Commission • Frank Rogers, Providence & Worcester Railroad • Russell G. St. John, Providence & Worcester Railroad Consultant I-95 Corridor Coalition B-1 Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study • Ken Dagliere, Representative for Senator Lieberman • Judy Gott, South Central Regional Council of Governments Maine • Kevin Rousseau, Maine Department of Transportation • Robert Grindrod, Montreal, Maine, & Atlantic Railway New York • Stephen Fisk, Canadian Pacific Railway • Jim Stauch, Canadian Pacific Railway • John Gibson, CSX • Maurice O’Connell, CSX • Steve Crosby, CSX • Bill Getts, CSX • Bill Gallighan, East of Hudson Rail Taskforce • Scott Ornstein, Metro North Railroad • Howard J. Mann, New York Metropolitan Transportation Council • Steve Slavick, New York State DOT New Jersey • John Powers, New Jersey Department of Transportation Rhode Island • Vasilios Harritos, Quonset Development Corporation • Evan Matthews, Quonset Development Corporation • Everett Stewart, Rhode Island Association of Railroad Passengers • Katherine Trapani, Rhode Island Department of Administration B-2 I-95 Corridor Coalition Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study List of Others Reviewers, Collaborators, and Stakeholders Connecticut • Mr. Ralph Harris, Naugatuck Railroad • Mr. Frank Rogers, Providence and Worcester Railroad Company • Mr. Edward J. Rodriguez, Housatonic Railroad Company • Mr. Ed Platt, Tilcon Connecticut Inc. • Mr. Charles Hunter, Connecticut Southern Railroad • Mr. Joseph K. Crawford, Guilford Rail System • Mr. A.J. Belliveau, Central New England Railroad • Mr. Gene Willey, CSX Transportation • Mr. David Fink, Guilford Railways • Mr. Michael J Riley, Motor Transport Association of Connecticut, Inc. • Mr. Leonard Lapsis, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Mr. Michael Vasaturo, Logistec USA Inc. • Mr. Tom Dubno, Gateway Terminal • Mr. R. Nelson Griebel, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Mr. Peter Richter, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Mr. Rodney Chabot, Connecticut Rail Commuter Council • Mr. Thomas Cheeseman, Connecticut Public Transportation Commission • Mr. Howard Permutt, Metro North Commuter Railroad • Mr. Michael J. DeCataldo, National Railroad Passenger Corporation • Hon. Christopher J. Dodd, United States Senator • Hon. Joseph I. Lieberman, United States Senator • Hon. Robert R. Simmons, Member of Congress • Hon. Rosa L. DeLauro, Member of Congress I-95 Corridor Coalition B-3 Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study • Hon. Christopher Shays, Member of Congress • Hon. Nancy L. Johnson, Member of Congress • Mr. James Wang, Greater Bridgeport Regional Planing Agency • Ms. Judy Gott, South Central Regional Council of Governments • Mr. Robert Wilson, South Western Regional Planning Agency • Ms. Melissa M. Leigh, South Western Regional Planning Agency • Mr. James Butler, Southeastern Connecticut Council of Governments • Ms. Linda Krause, Connecticut River Estuary Regional Planning Agency • Mr. Peter Dorpalen, Council of Governments of Central Naugatuck Valley • Mr. Lyle Wray, Capital Region Council of Governments • Mr. Marion Marrero, Capital Region Council of Governments • Mr. Carl Stephani, Central Connecticut Regional Planning Agency • Mr. Jonathan Chew, Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials • Mr. Richard Eigen, Valley Council of Governments • Mr. Geoffrey Colegrove, Midstate Regional Planning Agency • Mr. Samuel Gold, Council of Governments – Central Naugatuck Valley • Mr. Robert Pettinicchi, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Mr. Ned Hurle, Connecticut Department of Transportation • James Andrini, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Mr. Charles Barone, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Mr. Peter Labouliere, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Mr. Bob Hammersley, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Mr. David Head, Connecticut Department of Transportation • Mr. Ken Shooshan-Stoller, Central Connecticut Regional Planning Agency • Mr. Rick Dunne, Valley Council of Governments B-4 I-95 Corridor Coalition Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study • Mr. Richard C. (Dick) Caprenter, Connecticut Public Transportation Commission • Mr. Michael Sohn, Legislative Assistant for Congressman Christopher Shays Maine • Mr. Robert Grindrod, Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Railway • Mr. Burton S. Russell, Sprague Energy Corp. • Mr. Jonathan Daniels, Eastern Maine Development Corp. • Mr. David Fink, Guilford Railways • Mr. Ed Foley, St. Lawrence & Atlantic Railroad • Mr. George Wilmot, Merchant Shippers Association • Mr. Gordon Fuller, Morristown & Erie Railway • Mr. Don Craig, Androscoggin Transportation Resource Center • Mr. Rob Kenerson, Eastern Maine Development Corp. • Mr. Tom Reinauer, KACTS • Mr. John Duncan, PACTS New Hampshire • Mr. David A. Fink, Guilford Rail System • Mr. Ray Goss, St. Lawrence & Atlantic Railroad • Mr. Steve Arnold, New Hampshire Northcoast • Mr. Ed Jeffrey, New Hampshire Central RR • Mr. Peter Dearness, New England Southern RR • Mr. Cliff Sinnott, Rockingham Planning Commission • Mr. Steve Williams, Nashua Regional Planning Commission • Mr. Michael King, North Country Council • Mr. Roy Duddy, Office of Business and Industrial Development I-95 Corridor Coalition B-5 Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study Vermont • Mr. Robert C. Grindrod, Montreal, Maine and Atlantic Railroad • Mr. Raymond A. Goss, St. Lawrence & Atlantic Railroad • Mr. Frank K. Rogers, Providence and Worcester Railroad Company • Mr. David A. Fink, Guilford Rail System • Mr. Eric Bohn, OMYA • Mr. Matthew T. Sternberg, Rutland Redevelopment Authority • Mr. Charles W. Moore, RailAmerica • Mr. David W. Wulfson, Vermont Rail Systems • Mr. Jerry Hebda, Vermont Rail Systems • Mr. John Vincent, Vermont Transportation Authority • Mr. J. Jeffrey Munger, Office of Senator Jeffords • Mr. James Fitzgerald, Vermont House of Representatives • Mr. William Knight, Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization • Mr. Brian Searles, St. Albans City Hall • Mr. Mike Quinn, Vermont Dept. of Economic Development • Mr. George Barrett, Barrett Trucking Company, Inc. • Mr. Scott Bascom, Vtrans – Policy and Planning Division • Mr. Anthony Otis, Law Office of Anthony Otis New York • Mr. H. Craig Lewis, Norfolk Southern Corp. • Mr. Maurice J. O'Connell, CSX Corp. • Mr. Stephen Fisk, Canadian Pacific Railroad • Ms. Joan McDonald, NYC Economic Development Corp. • Mr. Steven Brown, ort Authority of NY & NJ B-6 I-95 Corridor Coalition Northeast Rail Operations (NEROps) Study • Mr. John Cappellino, Erie Co. Industrial Development Agency • Mr. Howard Permut, Metro North Railroad • Ms. Alice Cheng, New York Economic Development Corporation • Mr. Drew Galloway, Amtrak • Mr. Stan Slater , Amtrak • Mr. William Burt, Western NY & Pennsylvania RR/Livonia, Avon & Lakeville RR • Mr. Gerald Bogacz, New York Metropolitan Transportation Council • Mr. John Poorman, Capital District Transportation Committee • Mr. William Galligan, East of Hudson Rail Freight Task Force • Mr. Scott Ornstein, MetroNorth Railroad • Mr. Don Lotz, Port Authority
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Berkshire Passenger Rail Station Location and Design Analysis, Draft for Public Comment—August 2014
    BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Staff, Elected Officials, and Residents of the Berkshire Line Communities Karen Christensen and the Bring Back the Trains Campaign Bill Palmer, MassDOT Dustin Rhue, MassDOT Gary Sheppard, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bob Malnati, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority John R. Hanlon Jr., Housatonic Railroad Company Colin Pease, Housatonic Railroad Company Deborah Menette,Housatonic Railroad Company Berkshire Regional Planning Commission Nathaniel Karns, AICP, Executive Director Thomas Matuszko, AICP, Assistant Director Clete Kus, AICP, Transportation Manager Mark Maloy, GIS, Data and IT Manager Brian Domina, Senior Planner Patricia Mullins, Senior Planner Gwen Miller, Planner Jaclyn Pacejo, Planner BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This page intentionally left blank. BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary rail service. In some instances, the nearly significant challenge in locating a passen- Map 1: Locus Map The Housatonic Railroad Company (HRRC) century old historic passenger rail stations ger rail station in a downtown area was has proposed re-establishing passenger rail may meet these needs and in other instances, finding sites with sufficient room for park- service between Danbury, Connecticut and new locations may better serve them. ing. Thus, for the recommended down- Pittsfield, Massachusetts on the former town passenger rail stations a smaller To address this issue, the Berkshire Regional Berkshire Line. The passenger rail service amount of parking, compared to a regional Planning Commission (BRPC) partnered between these two locations last operated passenger rail station, will likely be availa- with HRRC to conduct this passenger rail in 1971 shortly after the Penn Central ble.
    [Show full text]
  • Tec Associates 46 Sawyer Street South Portland, Maine 04106 Table of Contents
    VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR: Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation) Grafton and Upton Railroad Company Housatonic Railroad Company Massachusetts Central Railroad Corporation Massachusetts Coastal Railroad New England Central Railroad Providence and Worcester Railroad Company For railroad rights-of-way in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 1 JANUARY 2021 – 31 DECEMBER 2025 PREPARED BY: TEC ASSOCIATES 46 SAWYER STREET SOUTH PORTLAND, MAINE 04106 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY OF RAILROADS COVERED BY THIS PLAN 1 A. Railroads Operating Under This Plan 1 B. Variations from Basic Plan 1 II. INTRODUCTION 1 III. GENERAL STATEMENT OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 3 IV. INTEGRATED VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 6 V. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF RAILROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY 8 A. Roadbed 9 B. Bridges 10 C. Culverts 10 D. Ditches 10 E. ROW Area Adjacent to the Shoulder 10 1. At-Grade (Level) Road Crossings 10 2. Railroad Signals and Switch Boxes 10 3. Inside Curves 10 F. Railroad Yards and Facilities 11 VI. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES 11 A. Mechanical Techniques 12 B. Herbicide Application 12 1. Weed Control 13 a. Preemergence Herbicide Program 14 b. Postemergence Herbicide Program 15 2. Brush Control 15 a. Foliar 15 b. Stem 15 c. Cut surface 16 3. Summation 16 C. Indirect Methods 16 VII. SENSITIVE AREAS 17 A. Identification and Location of Wells and Surface Water Supplies 18 B. Identification and Delineation of Wetlands 18 C. Field Procedure 20 1. Preparation 20 2. Boundary Establishment 20 3. Approval of Findings 20 D. Operational Strategies and Procedures 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS VIII. OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR APPLICATORS RELATIVE TO HERBICIDE USE 24 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 2013 A-GFTC Long Range Plan 2035
    ADIRONDACK/ GLENS FALLS TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL Long Range Plan Update: 2035 November 12, 2013 Adirondack/Glens Falls Transportation Council 11 South St., Suite 203, Glens Falls, NY 12801 P: 518‐223‐0086 F: 518‐223‐0584 Web: www.agftc.org Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Public Outreach and Input ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Planning Principles for A/GFTC ................................................................................................................................ 15 Demographic Trends ............................................................................................................................................... 17 Highways and Bridges .............................................................................................................................................. 22 Public Transportation .............................................................................................................................................. 34 Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities .................................................................................................................................... 41 Freight .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Trains 2019 Index
    INDEX TO VOLUME 79 Reproduction of any part of this volume for commercial pur poses is not allowed without the specific permission of the publishers. All contents © 2018 and 2019 by Kalmbach Media Co., Wau kesha, Wis. JANUARY 2019 THROUGH DECEMBER 2019 – 862 PAGES HOW TO USE THIS INDEX: Feature material has been indexed three or more times—once by the title under which it was published, again under the author’s last name, and finally under one or more of the subject categories or railroads. Photographs standing alone are indexed (usually by railroad), but photo graphs within a feature article are not separately indexed. Brief news items are indexed under the appropriate railroad and/or category; news stories are indexed under the appro- priate railroad and/or category and under the author’s last name. Most references to people are indexed under the company with which they are easily identified; if there is no easy identification, they may be indexed under the person’s last name (for deaths, see “Obi t uaries”). Maps, museums, radio frequencies, railroad historical societies, rosters of locomotives and equipment, product reviews, and stations are indexed under these categories. Items from countries other than the U.S. and Canada are indexed under the appropriate country. A Amtrak's elephant style, Ask TRAINS, Mar 62 Aiken Railway: Amtrak’s lost transcons, Jul 22-31 Once upon a time: Seaboard and Southern, Apr 51 Amtrak’s money mystery, Jan 50-55 A tale of two South Carolina short lines, Apr 46-53 At fault: train or track? Passenger, Nov
    [Show full text]
  • Naugatuck River Greenway Routing Study: Watertown
    Regional Naugatuck River Greenway Routing Study Table of Contents 1. Overview ............................................................................................... 3 2. Mission and Goals ..................................................................................... 5 3. Study Methodology .................................................................................... 6 4. Study Area .............................................................................................. 7 5. Potential Greenway Routing Analysis .............................................................. 8 6. Obstacles to Access and Connectivity (Gap Analysis) ......................................... 11 7. Affected Property Data ............................................................................ 12 8. General Construction Feasibility and Cost ...................................................... 12 9. Brownfields and Environmental Constraints .................................................... 13 10. Safety and Security ................................................................................ 14 11. Permitting Issues .................................................................................. 15 12. Coordination with Other Studies ................................................................ 18 13. Community Input .................................................................................. 19 14. Opportunities and Challenges ................................................................... 20 15. Recommended
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the New York, New Haven & Hartford
    RECORDS OF THE NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD IN CONNECTICUT Compiled by: John J. Doody, PE & PLS Principal Engineer, CDOT March 1, 2001 Connecticut Department of Transportation District 3 Surveys 140 Pond Lily Avenue New Haven, CT 06525 Attn: John J. Doody Tel: 203-389-3110 Fax: 203-389-3169 Email: [email protected] RR valuation maps on microfiche (also in each District Office & Newington) Centerline and Topography for New Canaan Line, Danbury Line & Waterbury Line 1"=40', reduced to 1"=100', paper and digital. Maine Line topography and centerline, various locations from Greenwich to New Haven, 1"=40', mostly Railroad Stations. AMTRAK topography, New Haven to Clinton, 1"=40' Dodd Center NYNH&H RR Archive Map Index (to be completed 6/2001) Over 2,300 maps in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and New York east of the Hudson River, including New York City. Connecticut State Library RR Commission Records Index Over 8,400 decisions rendered by the Railroad Commission from 1860 to the 1960's. This references complete files, including maps, on land transactions that came before the commission, as well as other matters. Connecticut State Library RR Commission Map Index Over 1,500 maps pertaining to RR Commission hearings listed above, all in Connecticut. Railroad Company Index. This is a listing of over 100 RR companies that later became part of the NYNH&H RR, when they were founded, and when they were bought out by other companies. Connecticut Department of Transportation 1998 Rail Transportation Ownership and Service Map. Lists owners, status of all rail lines in Connecticut.
    [Show full text]
  • NYSDOT "Rail Program-Report 1985"
    ~.. ~~\ . , t····_, & NEW YORK STATE RAIL PROGRAM REPORT ·1985 . Prepared by the Rail Division November 1985 NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MARIO M. CUOMO, Governor FRANKLIN E. WHITE, Commissioner NEW YORK STATE RAIL PROGRAM REPORT 1985 Prepared in compliance with the rules and regulations for the: State Rail Pian, per Section 5 (j) of the Department of Transportation Act; and Annual Report to the State legislature, per Chapter 257, Section 8, of the Laws of 1975 and Chapter 369, Section 2 of the laws of 1979. TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE INTRODUCTION iv CHAPTER 1: NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL PROGRAM 1 A. PROGRAM ELEMENTS 1 B. ACHIEVEMENTS 3 CHAPTER 2: NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL POLICY 6 A. AUTHORITY 6 B. POLICY 6 C. PLANNING PROCESS 9 CHAPTER 3: NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL SYSTEM 12 A. NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL FREIGHT SYSTEM 12 B. INTERCITY RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE 13 CHAPTER 4: RAIL ISSUES 18 CHAPTER 5: PROGRAM OF PROJECTS 29 A. PROJECT SELECTION PROCESS 29 B. CURRENT PROGRAM OF RAIL PROJECTS 30 C. PROJECTS UNDER REVIEW FOR FUTURE FUNDING 33 MAP 1 - NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL/HIGm~AY SYSTEM M.l MAP 2 - NEW YORK STATE'S RAIL SYSTEM M.2 APPENDIX I - PROJECTS COMPLETED UNDER NEW YORK STATE'S Al.1 RAIL PROGRAM A. 1974 BOND ISSUE Al.1 B. 1979 BOND ISSUE A1.3 C. FEDERAL LOCAL RAIL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM A1.4 D. STATE RAILASSISTANCE PROGRAM Al.5 E. RAILROAD BRIDGE RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Al.6 APPENDIX II - RAIL ABANDONMENTS A2.1 A. RAIL LINES ABANDONED DURING 1983-84 WITH NO A2.1 CONTINUATION OF SERVICE B.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory-Nomination
    FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections________________ 1. Name__________________ historic Housatnnir. Railroad Station_______________ and/or common New Milford Railroad Station 2. Location street & number Railroad not for publication city, town New Milford ftrtdgre~~S£^ vicinity of congressional district state CT code 09 county Litchfield 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use __ district x public occupied agriculture museum x building(s) private x unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation N/A X no military ^x_ other: unused 4. Owner of Property name Town nf IStew Mi 1 ford street & number 10 Main street city, town New Milford vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. New Milford Town Hall street & number 10 Main Street city, town New Milford, state CT 6. Representation in Existing Surveys State Register has this property been determined elegible? yes no date 1983 federal state county local depository for survey records Connecticut Historical Commission 59 South city, town Hartford, state CT 06106 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated unaltered x original site good ruins x altered moved date _ X-fair unexposed (roof) Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance Setting The New Milford Railroad Station is a simple, one-and-one- half-story, gabled-roof frame building which stands on an open site on a commercial street on the west edge of the village center.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro-North Railroad Certificate of Insurance
    Capital Contract Metro-North Railroad Operating Contract CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE Entry Permits AGREEMENT or CONTRACT NAME/DESCRIPTION: AGREEMENT or CONTRACT #: INSURANCE PRODUCER: CERTIFICATE ISSUANCE DATE: DATE RECEIVED: REFERENCE #: ADDRESS: PHONE #: CO COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED: LTR ADDRESS: A NAIC # B NAIC # PHONE #: C NAIC # D NAIC # CERTIFICATE Metro-North Railroad/MTA HOLDER: Attn: Risk & Insurance Management E NAIC # st ADDRESS: 2 Broadway, 21 Floor F NAIC # New York, NY 10004 G NAIC # PHONE#: (646) 252-1428 CO POLICY EFFECTIVE EXPIRATION TYPE OF INSURANCE LIMITS LTR NUMBER DATE DATE COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGES TO RENTED Occurrence $ SIR/Deductible $ PREMISES (Ea occurrence) PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GEN’L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ Policy Project Loc PRODUCTS – COMP/OP AGG $ Other: SIR/Deductible $ $ COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ (Ea accident) AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Any Auto BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ Owned Autos Only Scheduled Autos BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ Hired Autos Only Non-Owned PROPERTY DAMAGE $ Autos Only (Per accident) UMBRELLA LIAB Occurrence EACH OCCURRENCE $ Excess Liab Claims Made DED Retention $ AGGREGATE $ WORKER’S COMPENSATION STATUTORY LIMITS AND EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY USLH Jones Act “Other States” Coverage EMPLOYER’S LIABILITY $ GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY EACH ACCIDENT $ Any Auto Owned Autos Only EA ACC $ OTHER THAN Hired Autos Only AUTO ONLY Non-Owned Autos Only AGG $ PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY Includes incidental Pollution Liability $ Deductible $ OTHER:
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Benefits of Housatonic Railroad Passenger Service Stephen Sheppard
    Economic Benefits of Housatonic Railroad Passenger Service Stephen Sheppard Economic Benefits of Housatonic Railroad Passenger Service 0 Economic Benefits of Housatonic Railroad Passenger Service Stephen Sheppard Economic Benefits of Housatonic Railroad Passenger Service1 Contents 0. Summary of findings ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 1. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 3 2. Approach and methods of analysis………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 4 a. Inter-industry models to measure changes in output and employment b. Impact on public sector revenues c. Impact on tourism d. Impact on house values and residential construction e. Environmental benefits 3. Defining the region for analysis .…………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 8 a. Importance of regional definition b. Economic overview of the region 4. Economic benefits ………….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 10 a. Construction b. Operation c. Impact on tourism d. Public sector e. Housing market f. Environmental and traffic-related benefits 5. Conclusions .………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 28 6. Appendix tables .……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 30 a. Impacts on output in each sector of the economy b. Impacts on employment in each sector of the economy 1 Prepared by Professor Stephen Sheppard, Director, Center for Creative Community Development and Kay Oehler, Research Coordinator, Center for Creative Community Development. 1 Economic Benefits of Housatonic Railroad Passenger Service Stephen
    [Show full text]
  • Danbury Terminal Railroad Company Maybrook Properties Incorporated
    EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION Danbury Terminal Railroad Company Maybrook Properties Incorporated This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the status of Danbury Terminal Railroad Company (DTR) and Maybrook Properties Incorporated (MPI) as employers under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. §231 et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. §351 et seq.) (RUIA). In Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) Finance Docket No. 32180 (Sub-No. 1), decided December 21, 1992, DTR and MPI modified a previously filed notice of exemption to acquire and operate approximately 157.15 miles of certain rail lines in Connecticut and New York owned or operated by Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) (BA No.1321). The ICC decision stated that DTR would acquire from Conrail: (1) operating rights in Danbury Yard (owned by State of Connecticut); (2) operating and freight rights over the Harlem line between milepost 22.0 in White Plains, New York, and milepost 81.6 in Wassaic, New York (leased by Metropolitan Transportation Authority and controlled by Metro North Commuter Railroad between milepost 22.0 and milepost 76.6, and owned by New York and Harlem Railroad and leased to Penn Central Corporation between milepost 76.6 and milepost 81.6); and (3) incidental trackage rights over the Waterbury Branch (owned by the State of Connecticut and controlled by Metro North Commuter Railroad) between milepost 0.0 in Devon, Connecticut, and milepost 8.9 in Derby, Connecticut. The ICC decision stated that MPI would acquire from Conrail and DTR would operate: (1) The Danbury Secondary Track (a) between milepost 0.0 in Beacon, New York, and milepost 12.8 in Hopewell Junction, New York, and (b) between milepost 42.9 in Hopewell Junction, and milepost 104.8 in Derby, Connecticut; (2) The Stepney Branch in Botsford (Newtown), Connecticut between milepost 14.2 and milepost 14.6; and (3) The New Milford Secondary Track between milepost 0.0 in Berkshire Junction, Connecticut, and milepost 13.65 in New Milford, Connecticut.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty Of
    A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY by Mark Edward Anderson IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE MASTER OF ARTS For the ~raduafeDivision THE SHEPAUG VALLEY RAILROAD: AN AMERICAN STORY Mark Edward Anderson Bantam, Connecticut May, 1989 SHEPAUG VALLEY RAILROAD SERVICE AT GREATEST EXTENT JULY 1872 Intermediate Mileaqe Station- Litchfield Lake Bantam Morris Romford New Preston Washington Judd's Bridge Roxbury (Chalybes) Roxbury Falls f Shepaug (Southbury) Hanover Springs Hawleyville I { Stoney Hill (Plumtrees) k Bethel (via Danbury and Norwalk owned tracks, leased to Shepaug) Source: Shepaug Valley Railroad Public Timetable Dated: As above --TABLE OF CONTENTS SHEPAUG VALLEY RAILROAD STATIONS with INTERWDIATE MILEAGES SHOWN ........Frontispiece 1 MAP: WESTERN CONNECTICUT RAILROADS IN THE LATE 1800's ..............Frontispiece 2 -AN AmRICAN STORY ...............................Pages 1 - 69 APPENDICIES: Pages 70 - 83 1. PRO-RAILROAD PROPERTY OIJNERS LITCHFIELD, CONNECTICUT: 1870 2. PRO-RAILROAD LANDOWNING PETITIONERS ROXBURY, CONNECTICUT: 1869 3. PRO-RAILROAD LANDOLQIING PETITIONERS MORRIS, CONNECTICUT: 1869 4. WASHINGTON, CONNECTICUT PROPERTY OUNERS GRANTING RIGHTS-OF-WAY TO SHEPAUG VALLEY RAILROAD: 1870 - 1872 5. FOREIGN CAR MOVEMENTS; SHEPAUC-, LITCHFIELD AND NORTHERN RAILROAD: 1895 - 1898 6. EXCERPTS: SHEPAUG. LITCHFIELD AND NORTHERN RAILROAD ANNUAL REPORT: 1898 BIBLIOGRAPHY: SOURCES CONSULTED ............... .Pages 84 - 86 Prior to the mid-nineteenth century, Litchfield, Connecticut had thrived as a major crossroads of two post-colonial trunk routes, the New Haven to Albany and Hartford to New York turnpikes. This Yankee hill town boasted several good hotels and taverns of reputation, was seat of its namesake county and service center for many surrounding, smaller settlements. The stagecoach lines that travelled the two turnpikes had used Litchfield as a stopover and interchange point and had thus contributed to the town a measure of prosperity.
    [Show full text]