Inventory Noyes Collection

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inventory Noyes Collection 1 Inventory Noyes Collection Zoe Johnson Isabel Bonhomme Rebecca Johnston Annie Carney M. Alex Kaufmann Nate Weaver Started: Feb. 10th 2014 Abstract: The Noyes family, coming to Seville, Ohio in 1840 was a family heavily tied to the Presbyterian church, as well as having ties to The College of Wooster beginning when it first opened its doors in 1870, then The University of Wooster. Varnum Noyes, the patriarch of the family, was the first minister of the Presbyterian church in Seville.1 This collection contains accounts, journals, letters, pamphlets, prose, and sermons from different members of the family, the largest body of which are from Varnum’s daughter Harriet, who spent most of her life, fifty-six years to be exact,2 as a missionary in Canton, China (Guangzhou, Guangdong province 广东省广州市) from 1868 to 1923. Harriet opened one of the first schools for women and girls in all of China, the True Light Seminary (真 光书院) in 1872, and spent the majority of her career as a missionary heading this school and others. Beginning with her departure through her last days abroad, these materials document the incredible life of an expatriate in an environment different from her own. In her correspondence Harriet raises many issues of 19th-century imperialism, discussing the application of American presence in Asia. A product of her time, she uses language that is indicative of her race, class, and gender. Harriet also discusses contemporary politics in China during a period that marked the epoch of Western imperialism. Harriet’s [440] (updated 160513) documents including letters, journals, and reports among other document types, provide insight into the life of a missionary woman and the relationships she had in China and back at home. Furthermore, her letters reveal how Americans of the 19th century viewed and interacted with China and Chinese individuals. Harriet’s letters are a valuable resource for those interested in researching Chinese history, the history of colonialism and/or imperialism, missionary history, the history of the Presbyterian mission, the history of women’s education in China, American history, and Sino- American relations. The annotations provided below on Harriet’s correspondence and other documents that have been processed provide a partial look into her experience as a missionary in Guangzhou, Guangdong. The annotations serve to provide the researcher with a general basis of knowledge on Harriet, her work, and 1M. Alex Kaufmann, “Noyes Main Stone #1”, photograph, (Wooster, Ohio: 2015), from The College of Wooster’s Department of Special Collections in Andrews Library: Noyes Family Graves in The Noyes Collection. 2 M. Alex Kaufmann, “HARRIET NOYES”, photograph, (Wooster, Ohio: 2015), from The College of Wooster’s Department of Special Collections in Andrews Library: Noyes Family Graves in The Noyes Collection. 2 what life was like during this period at this location. However, it is important to note that the annotations provided below are not complete summaries of each letter, nor are they word-for-word transcriptions. The researcher using this collection should use this inventory as a tool to assist in their research, and nothing more. [Other family members’ information] Master List of Thematic Classifications of Correspondence Travel Violence, War, and Politics Medicine & Health 1867 November 8 (Harriet) 1868 July 28 (Harriet) 1868 January 13 (Harriet) 1868 February 20 (Harriet & 1868 December 11 (Harriet to 1868 January 28 (Harriet) Emily) Lois) 1868 February 20 (Harriet & 1868 March 22 & April 13 & 1868 June 3 (Harriet) Edward) April 14 (Harriet) 1868 July 28 (Harriet) 1868 May 23 (Harriet) 1868 May 23 (Harriet) 1870 April 1 (Harriet) 1868 June 10 (Harriet) 1868 June 3 (Harriet) 1871 May 10 (Harriet) 1868 July [10?] (Harriet) 1868 July [10?] (Harriet) 1871 May 31 (Harriet) 1868 September 12 (Harriet) 1868 November 9 (Harriet) 1871 July 1 (Harriet) 1868 October 12 (Harriet) 1869 October 15 (Harriet) 1871 July 22 (Harriet) 1868 December 11 (Harriet to 1868 December 11 (Harriet to 1871 August 6 (Harriet) Lois) Lois) 1871 November 6 (Harriet) 1869 April 15 (Harriet) [1869?] November 10 (Harriet) 1872 February 13 (Harriet) 1869 May 4 (Harriet) 1870 January 10 (Harriet) 1872 March 11 (Harriet) [1869?] (Harriet) 1870 March 9 (Harriet) 1872 July 9 (Henry) 1870 May 4 (Harriet) 1870 April 1 (Harriet) 1872 July 23 (Harriet) 1870 May 31 (Harriet) 1870 April 11 (Harriet) 1872 July 25 (Harriet) 1870 October 11 & 12 (Harriet) 1870 September 30 (Harriet) 1872 August 9 (Harriet) [1870?] (Harriet) [1870?] October 11 & 12 1872 September 20 (Henry?) 1871 April 10 (Harriet) (Harriet) 1872 December 10 (Harriet) 1871 May 10 (Harriet) 1871 May 31 (Harriet) 1873 May 31 (Harriet) 1871 May 31 (Harriet) 1871 July 1 (Harriet) 1873 November 6 (Harriet) 1871 June 10 (Harriet) 1871 July 22 (Harriet) 1875 February 27 (Harriet) 1871 August 6 (Harriet) 1871 August 10 (Harriet) 1875 May 31 (Harriet) 1872 January 9 (Henry?) 1871 September 5 (Harriet) 1875 September 29 (Martha) 1872 January 10 (Harriet) 1871 October 11 (Harriet) 1875 October 13 (Martha) 1872 April 10 (Harriet & Frank) 1871 November 6 (Harriet) 1875 October 13 (Harriet) 1872 May 20 (Henry) 1871 December 6 (Harriet) 1876 June 29 (Martha) 1872 May 31 (Harriet) 1872 January 9 (Henry?) 1878 April 22 (Harriet) 1872 July 9 (Henry) 1872 January 10 (Harriet) 1878 September 23 (Harriet) 1872 July 23 (Harriet) 1872 February 13 (Harriet) 1880 October 25 (Henry) 1872 August 6 (Harriet) 1872 February 15 (Harriet) 1881 May 6 (Harriet) 1872 August 9 (Henry) 1872 February 15 (Harriet & 1881 June 12 (Harriet) 1872 September 30 (Harriet) Varnum) 1881 September 30 (Harriet) 1873 May 13 (Harriet) 1872 March 11 (Harriet & 1882 May 22 (Harriet) 1873 September 7 (Harriet) Edward) 1883 January 3 (Harriet) 1873 September 25 (Harriet) 1872 March 11 (Harriet & 1883 February 3 (Harriet) 1873 November 25 (Harriet) Frank) 1883 July 18 (Harriet) 1874 February 25 (Harriet & Edward) 3 1872 April 10 (Harriet & 1883 August 31 (Harriet) 1874 April 18 (Harriet) Varnum) 1883 September 26 (Harriet) 1874 April 23 (Harriet) 1872 May 4 (Harriet) 1883 October 22 (Harriet) 1874 May 11 (Harriet) 1872 May 20 (Henry) 1884 January 24 (Harriet) 1874 June 2 & 8 (Harriet) 1872 July 9 (Henry) 1884 March 1 (Harriet) 1874 June (Harriet) 1872 July 23 (Harriet) 1884 August 7 (Harriet) 1874 July 27 (Harriet) 1872 July 25 (Harriet) 1884 August 28 (Harriet) 1874 September 14 (Harriet) 1872 August 6 (Harriet) 1884 September 4 (Harriet) 1874 September 21 (Harriet) 1872 December 10 (Harriet) 1884 September 30 (Henry) 1874 September 22 (Harriet) 1873 January 30 (Harriet) 1884 October 27 (Henry) 1874 October 12 (Martha) 1873 March 31 & April 10 1884 November 17 (Harriet) 1874 October 19 (Harriet) (Harriet) 1885 April 16 (Harriet) 1874 November 9 (Harriet & 1873 April 10 (Henry) 1885 April 30 (Harriet) Sarah) 1873 May 9 (Harriet) 1888 September 26 (Harriet) 1874 November 9 (Martha) 1873 May 31 (Harriet) 1888 October 11 (Harriet) 1874 November 27 (Harriet) 1873 June 1 & 11 (Harriet) 1892 June 11 (Martha) 1875 January 30 (Harriet & 1873 July 10 (Harriet) 1897 July 28 (Henry) Emily) 1873 August 25 (Harriet) 1906 July 28 (Henry) 1875 February 27 (Harriet) 1873 September 14 (Harriet) 1923 May 16 (Harriet & Electra) 1875 April 13 (Martha) 1873 September 25 (Harriet) [?] April 23 (Martha) 1875 September 4 (Martha) 1873 October 21 (Harriet) 1875 September 29 (Martha) 1873 November 6 (Harriet) 1875 November 12 (Harriet) 1873 November 23 (Harriet) 1876 March 27 (Martha) 1873 November 25 (Harriet) 1876 December 1 (Martha) 1873 December 17 (Harriet) [1876?] December 6 (Marta) 1874 February 25 (Harriet & 1877 April 21 (Martha) Edward) 1878 February 2 (Henry) 1874 April 16 (Harriet) 1878 March 24 (Harriet) 1874 April 18 (Harriet) 1878 March 28 (Henry) 1874 April 23 (Harriet) 1878 May 24 (Harriet) 1874 April 24 (Harriet) 1878 July 13 (Harriet) 1874 May 11 (Harriet) 1879 April 24 (Henry) 1874 June 2 & 8 (Harriet) 1879 July 1 (Harriet) 1874 July 1 (Harriet) 1879 August 23 (Mattie) 1874 July 9 (Harriet) 1879 August 25 (Harriet) 1874 July 27 (Harriet) 1879 September 30 (Henry) 1874 September 14 (Harriet) 1879 December 3 (Henry) 1874 September 21 (Harriet) 1879 December 22 (Henry) 1874 September 22 (Harriet) 1880 February 5 (Henry) 1874 October 1 (Harriet) 1880 March 23 (Harriet) 1874 October 12 (Martha) 1880 April [6?] (Henry) 1874 October 19 (Harriet) 1880 June 28 (Harriet) 1874 November 9 (Harriet & 1880 December 23 (Harriet) Sarah) 1881 January 7 (Harriet) 1874 November 9 (Martha) 1881 March 21 (Martha) 1875 January 19 (Harriet) 1881 May 12 (Harriet) 1875 January 30 (Harriet & 1881 May 14 (Harriet) Emily) 1881 June 12 (Harriet) 1875 February 10 & 11 (Harriet) 1881 June 27 (Harriet & Mary) 1875 February 27 (Harriet) 1881 June 27 (Harriet & Sarah) 4 1875 April 13 (Martha) 1881 July 20 & 22 (Harriet) 1875 May 31 (Harriet) 1881 July 27 (Harriet) 1875 July 1 (Harriet) 1881 July 28 (Harriet) 1875 July 5 (Harriet) 1881 August 29 (Harriet to 1875 July 7 (Harriet) Emily) 1875 July 30 (Harriet) 1881 August 29 (Harriet to 1875 September 4 (Martha) Varnum) 1875 September 14 (Martha) 1881 August 30 (Harriet) 1875 September 29 (Martha) [1881?] (Harriet) 1875 December 31 (Harriet) 1882 May 22 (Harriet) 1876 January 10 (Harriet) 1882 July 8 (Harriet) 1876 January 14 (Harriet) 1882 July 24 (Harriet) 1876 January 17 (Harriet) 1882 August 10 (Harriet) 1876 February 12 (Martha) 1882 August 21 (Harriet) 1876 February 14 (Harriet) 1882 May 19 (Harriet) 1876 March 12 (Harriet)
Recommended publications
  • The Historical Context
    CHAPTER ONE THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT Introduction The Historically Documented Context of the Informants' Stories The China Inland Mission (CIM) The China Inland Mission Schools Chefoo 1931 - 1940 CIM January, 1940 - July, 1940 CIM October, 1940 - December, 1941 Chefoo 1941 - 1942 Evacuation of Chefoo Formation of Weihsien Internment Camp Education at Weihsien Chefoo Transfer Repatriation and Internment Chefoo in Weihsien Seasons of trials Liberation Day Issues of Personal Reality and Official History Summary THE HISTORICAL CONTEXT Introduction This chapter describes the setting in which the stories of the informants' lives took place. The historical context for this study is North China during the Second World War. It was at this time that the China Inland Mission Schools (Chefoo), a British school for children of Western missionaries and other expatriates, came under Japanese-occupation, and was eventually relocated to a civilian assembly center. (1) These actions of occupation and internment were the external threats to the school's continuity. The war and its outcome meant the end of the British colonial lifestyle in which this school had been established and had existed for sixty-two years. Subtle yet even more damaging threats came from within the internment camp as the once secluded school was suddenly thrust into close contact with people of various backgrounds and beliefs. The purpose of this study will be to analyze how teachers and students responded to these challenges in order to convey and maintain the ethos of their school and culture. 1 Through the use of primary and secondary sources, a panorama of the events that affected their youth is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chima Council Third Annual Meeting
    THE CHIMA COUNCIL THIRD ANNUAL MEETING Í9Í2 o V a PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH . IN THE U.S.A. ' f i d * VY •.3 ^ = 0 MINUTES OF THE THIRD ANNUAL MEETING O F T H E ------ China Council of the Presbyterian Church in the U. S. A. HE Council met in the Missionary Home, Shanghai, at the stated time, November ist, 1912, the Chairman, Rev. J. W- i/owrie, calling the meeting to order and opening its session with devotional exercises. There­ after each day’s meeting was opened with a devotional half mhour, and each session opened and closed with prayer. The personnel of the Council was as follows :— Rev. J. W. Lowrie, Chairman. Rev. A. M. Cunningham ... representing North China Mission. Charles F. Johnson, M .D ...................representing Shantung Mission. Rev. W. O. Elterich, Ph. D. ...representing Shantung Mission. Rev. O. C. Crawford..............representing Central China Mission. Rev. J. C. Garritt, D.D., Vice-Chairman, do. Kiangan Mission. Rev. W. T. Locke ......................... representing Hunan Mission. Rev. H. V. Noyes, D.D. ... representing South China Mission. Rev. P. W. McClintock ..............representing Hainan Mission. Mr. McClintock was appointed secretary. The personnel of the Council having changed slightly since the last meeting, the following changes in the Permanent Committees were ordered (It was decided that newly elected members of the Council should take the places on committees of the Council of the delegates whom they succeed.):— Dr. Noyes, Chairman Educational Committee. Dr. Elterich, to the Committees on Mission Force, and on Edu­ cational Work. Dr. Garritt, to the Committees on Evangelistic Work and on Finance.
    [Show full text]
  • (CN 208, T1) for the Billy Graham Center Archives. No Spoken Words Which Were Recorded Are Omitted
    This is a complete transcript of the oral history interview with Doris Embery (CN 208, T1) for the Billy Graham Center Archives. No spoken words which were recorded are omitted. In a very few cases, the transcribers could not understand what was said, in which case [unclear] was inserted. Also, grunts and verbal hesitations such as “ah” or “um” are usually omitted. Readers of this transcript should remember that this is a transcript of spoken English, which follows a different rhythm and even rule than written English. Three dots indicate an interruption or break in the train of thought within the sentence of the speaker. Four dots indicate what the transcriber believes to be the end of an incomplete sentence. ( ) Word in parentheses are asides made by the speaker. [ ] Words in brackets are comments made by the transcriber. This transcript was created by Janyce H. Nasgowitz and W. Gregory Thompson and was completed in June 1994. Please note: This oral history interview expresses the personal memories and opinions of the interviewee and does not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Billy Graham Center Archives or Wheaton College. © 2017. The Billy Graham Center Archives. All rights reserved. This transcript may be reused with the following publication credit: Used by permission of the Billy Graham Center Archives, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL. BGC Archives CN 208, T1 Transcript - Page 2 Collection 208, Tape 1. Oral history interview with Doris Embery by Robert Shuster on April 20, 1982. SHUSTER: One, two, three. This is an interview with Miss Doris Embery... EMBERY: Embrey.
    [Show full text]
  • Englischer Diplomat, Commissioner Chinese Maritime Customs Biographie 1901 James Acheson Ist Konsul Des Englischen Konsulats in Qiongzhou
    Report Title - p. 1 of 266 Report Title Acheson, James (um 1901) : Englischer Diplomat, Commissioner Chinese Maritime Customs Biographie 1901 James Acheson ist Konsul des englischen Konsulats in Qiongzhou. [Qing1] Adam, James Robertson (Dundee, Schottland 1863-1915 Anshun, Guizhou vom Blitz erschlagen) : Protestantischer Missionar China Inland Mission Biographie 1887 James Robertson Adam wird Missionar der China Inland Mission in China. [Prot2] Addis, John Mansfield = Addis, John Mansfield Sir (1914-1983) : Englischer Diplomat Biographie 1947-1950 John Mansfield Addis ist Erster Sekretär der britischen Botschaft in Nanjing. [SOAS] 1950-1954 John Mansfield Addis ist im Foreign Office der britischen Botschaft in Beijing tätig. [ODNB] 1954-1957 John Mansfield Addis ist Generalkonsul der britischen Botschaft in Beijing. [SOAS] 1970-1974 John Mansfield Addis ist Botschafter der britischen Regierung in Beijing. [SOAS] 1975 John Mansfield Addis wird Senior Research Fellow in Contemporary Chinese Studies am Wolfson College, Oxford. [SOAS] Adeney, David Howard (Bedford, Bedfordshire 1911-1994) : Englischer protestantischer Missionar China Inland Mission Biographie 1934 Ruth Adeney lernt Chinesisch an der Sprachenschule der China Inland Mission in Yangzhou (Jiangsu) ; David Howard Adeney in Anqing (Anhui). [BGC] 1934-1938 David Howard Adeney ist als Missionar in Henan tätig. [BGC] 1938 Heirat von David Howard Adeney und Ruth Adeney in Henan. [BGC] 1938-1941 David Howard Adeney und Ruth Adeney sind als Missionare in Fangcheng (Henan) tätig. [BGC] 1941-1945 David Howard Adeney und Ruth Adeney halten sich in Amerika auf. [BGC] 1946-1950 David Howard Adeney und Ruth Adeney sind für das Chinese Inter-Varisty Fellowship für Universitäts-Studenten in Nanjing und Shanghai tätig. [BGC] 1950-1956 David Howard Adeney und Ruth Adeney halten sich in Amerika auf.
    [Show full text]
  • Internment at Temple Hill
    - 1 - war [in which] he must find a strength greater than all the Preface events that surround him." My story from Weihsien—and that also of others in the camp, as well as at Lungwha—is a testimony to the presence and power of God through His help and through people. Experiencing this presence and any of the following boyhood memories and experiences M power turned what could have been nothing but tragedy and have been told in little segments over these past forty trauma into triumph. years, but somehow the task of threading the whole story together in response to many requests kept eluding me. David J. Michell My wife Joan, more than anyone else, has been the most pa- March 1988 tient listener and has helped me in working through the feel- Toronto ings and meaning of these experiences. Our four children— Robyn, Heather, Ken, and Judith—have been familiar with most of the adventures from their earliest years. At one FOREWORD time, in fact, I recorded my story incognito, under the title of "The Boy X from China," and Joan would play an episode each night before the children went to bed when I was away Are they really compatible—God's design for the family on missionary travels. and His call to world evangelism? Far from being I am grateful for the Overseas Missionary Fellowship's giv- merely a question for classroom debate, this is a question ing me time for sabbatical study, and to Dr. Timothy M. War- for which potential missionaries and supporting churches ner of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School for allowing me to increasingly demand answers.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Canadian Journal of Disability Studies Published by the Canadian Disability Studies Association Association canadienne d’études sur le handicap Hosted by The University of Waterloo www.cjds.uwaterloo.ca Wan, Annetta T. Mills and the Origin of Deaf Education in China CJDS 10.1 (February 2021) Annetta T. Mills and the Origin of Deaf Education in China Annetta T. Mills et l’origine de l’éducation des personnes sourdes en Chine Shu Wan History Department University at Buffalo [email protected] Abstract As the first education institution enrolling deaf children in China, the Chefoo School for the Deaf (which will be called “Chefoo School” in the rest of this article) was originally established by the American missionary couple Charles R. Mills and Annetta T. Mills. In the first decade of the twentieth century, the Chefoo School succeeded in attracting students across the country. For investigating Mills’s contributions to the proliferation of Chinese deaf education in a transnational context, this article will consist of the following three sections. The first section primarily discusses the early history of deaf education in China before the establishment of the Chefoo School in 1898. As early as the 1840s, Chinese elites had already gained firsthand knowledge of deaf education in the United States. Around the 1870s, American and French missionaries respectively proposed to establish a specific deaf school, which took care of deaf children in Shanghai but failed to provide special education to them. And then the second section of this article will examine Mills’s efforts to seek financial support from the transnational community of deaf education.
    [Show full text]
  • By Sharing with Jesus
    Have you prayed for your missionaries lately? After reading about Alice Hayes Taylor’s story, we made it a priority to pray for our missionaries. The story of the Taylors is one of love, strength, and trust in God. Their story is the first one in this month’s devotional. And, it’s the Taylor family as in Hudson Taylor—the courageous English missionary who founded the China Inland Mission. One part of the story that we didn’t have the space to put in is about the pact Alice Taylor made with God. “All right, God,” I said finally. John and Mary and Kathleen and Jamie are in Your care. With all my heart I believe that You will guard them. I know that You will bring us back together, and until that day comes, I will put all my energy into Your work. I promise.” We had a pact, God and I, and I knew He would keep His part of it. And I must keep mine. So it went, each day—taking care of the things dear to God. Like the day at the house of Mr. Chang, whose body and mind were devastated by disease. “He will not let anyone near the house,” his wife warned. I walked to the window and called, “Mr. Chang, we have come to pray for you. You can be healed. Please let us come in.” And he did! He turned his life over to God. And I knew that God was watching over my children. (Taylor, Alice.”He Will Not Forsake My Children.” Guideposts 39.7.
    [Show full text]
  • Morality, Segregation, and the Discrepancy
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The University of Utah: J. Willard Marriott Digital Library THE HYGIENIC CHILDHOOD: MORALITY, SEGREGATION, AND THE DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THEORY AND PRACTICE IN TREATY PORT CHINA by Jennifer Willoughby A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of History The University of Utah August 2014 Copyright © Jennifer Willoughby 2014 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Jennifer Willoughby has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Janet Theiss , Chair 6/10/2014 Date Approved Wesley Sasaki-Uemura , Member 6/10/2014 Date Approved Nadja Durbach , Member 6/10/2014 Date Approved and by Isabel Moreira , Chair/Dean of the Department/College/School of History and by David B. Kieda, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the impact that colonial isolationist theory had upon childrearing techniques in treaty port China between 1881 and 1937. It works from the hypothesis that proper physical, moral, and identity development were all treated as components of good child health. It argues that obsessively isolationist practices resulted from the limited local hegemony held under extraterritoriality. Unable to institute far- reaching hygienic regulations, the foreign community instead chose to insulate itself in foreign concessions and exclusive resort towns. The main goal of isolationist childrearing and education was to simulate an entirely Western environment and produce young adults who were virtually indistinguishable from their peers in the metropole.
    [Show full text]
  • This Is a Complete Transcript of the Oral History Interview Jennie Kingston Fitzwilliam (CN 272, T5) for the Billy Graham Center Archives
    This is a complete transcript of the oral history interview Jennie Kingston Fitzwilliam (CN 272, T5) for the Billy Graham Center Archives. No spoken words which were recorded are omitted. In a very few cases, the transcribers could not understand what was said, in which case [unclear] was inserted. Also, grunts and verbal hesitations such as “ah” or “um” are usually omitted. Readers of this transcript should remember that this is a transcript of spoken English, which follows a different rhythm and even rule than written English. Chinese place names are spelled in the transcript in the old or new transliteration form according to how the speaker pronounced them. Thus, "Peking" is used instead of "Beijing," if that is how the interviewee pronounced it. Chinese terms and phrases which would be understood were spelled as they were pronounced with some attempt made to identify the accepted transliteration form to which it corresponds. Three dots indicate an interruption or break in the train of thought within the sentence of the speaker. Four dots indicate what the transcriber believes to be the end of an incomplete sentence. ( ) Word in parentheses are asides made by the speaker. [ ] Words in brackets are comments made by the transcriber. This transcript was created by Alice L. Fitzwilliam and Robert Shuster and was completed in September 2003. Please note: This oral history interview expresses the personal memories and opinions of the interviewee and does not necessarily represent the views or policies of the Billy Graham Center Archives or Wheaton College. © 2017. The Billy Graham Center Archives. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Researchmatters
    ResearchMatters Issue 2, January-March 2011 The Quarterly Newsletter of OMF Mission Research Welcome to the second issue of Research 1910, the founding nearly 50 years later of the WCC; Matters the quarterly newsletter of OMF our contemporary moment in history 100 years on in Missions Research 2010. IN THIS ISSUE Three moments in time over the last century 1) 1910 – the conference in Edinburgh itself • D. Robert @ Edinburgh 2010 The 1910 Edinburgh Missionary Conference repre- • MRD News: MRC 2010 in Review • Websites that matter sents an important moment of reflection for the Chris- • Glimpses from the Archive tian church on the task of mission: FROM THE MISSION RESEARCH “A century ago, over twelve hundred delegates DEPARTMENT from Protestant missionary societies came by ship and 2010 has been a year of consultations! I am, of course, train to Edinburgh. … They gathered under the as- not just thinking about the OMF Mission Research Con- sumption that missions operated in the context of sultation which looked at the interplay between the Holy western colonialism. But they departed with a prophet- Spirit and the Spirit World of Asia, but the Consultations ic glimpse of Christianity as a worldwide fellowship! In which have been held around the globe. From Edinburgh other words, the conference itself awakened them to in the North to Lausanne III at Cape Town in the South, the reality that discussions of mission policy could not from Tokyo in the East and to Boston in the West, Chris- tians have been considering afresh how we participate in be separated from the deeper meaning of the church as the process of mission.
    [Show full text]
  • China Inland Mission
    CIM HANDLIST OF THE PHOTOGRAPH COLLECTION OF THE CHINA INLAND MISSION The Library School of Oriental and African Studies August 1993 1 CIM/PHOTO CHINA INLAND MISSION PHOTOGRAPHS The photographs in this collection number over 7,000 and are from three different sources. The first is Frederick Howard Taylor, James Hudson Taylor's son, who collected particularly photographs associated with his father's early life in England, some of which he himself took in the early 1900's. The second source is the official records of the China Inland Mission/Overseas Missionary Fellowship. These include albums (CIM/PHOTO 2/298-305) and loose photographs (CIM/PHOTO 2/306-372), often produced for special occasions, and a series of photographs collected from missionaries working in the field and arranged under subject headings (CIM/PHOTO 2/1-197). These include medical work and scenes of everyday life in China, Taiwan, Thailand and Tibet. The medical work is mostly concentrated in photographs 248-295. The third source is the records kept by A.J. Broomhall, the mission's historian, to facilitate and illustrate his research into the work of Taylor. These photographs are very varied, dating back to the 1860's, and include original photographs of the 'Lammermuir' party and also some of the missionaries who preceded it to China. There are many duplicates in this section, which is divided into two, general photographs and those selected for use in A.J. Broomhall's work, Hudson Tay for and China's Open Century. Although this is the main CIM photograph collection in SOAS, there are further photographs in CIM/PP LIBERTY, CIM/PP WITHERS and CIM/PP FHT NOTES.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Corbett and Harold F. Smith Papers, 1862 – 1948
    The Burke Library Archives, Columbia University Libraries, Union Theological Seminary, New York Missionary Research Library Archives: Section 6 Finding Aid for Hunter Corbett and Harold F. Smith Papers, 1862 – 1948 Hunter Corbett, 1886. Finding Aid prepared by: Paul A. Byrnes, Spring 1977 Revised with additions by Ruth Tonkiss Cameron, January 2006. Finding aid elements updated April 2013 by Brigette C. Kamsler with financial support from the Henry Luce Foundation Summary Information Creator: Hunter Corbett, 1835 – 1920; Harold F. Smith, 1885- [196?] Title: Hunter Corbett and Harold F. Smith Papers Inclusive dates: 1862 – 1948 Bulk dates: 1862 – 1930 Abstract: Corbett: pioneer Presbyterian missionary in Chefoo, China; Smith: son-in- law of Corbett, teacher in Chefoo School and Cheeloo University. Corbett’s diaries during itineration in Shantung; HC and HFS papers and correspondence covering major historical events in China, papers on education and higher education in China, 1900-1948; photographs and miscellaneous. Size: 8 boxes, 4.00 linear feet Storage: Onsite storage Repository: The Burke Library Union Theological Seminary 3041 Broadway New York, NY 10027 Email: [email protected] MRL 6: Hunter Corbett and Harold F. Smith Papers, 1862-1948 2 Administrative Information Provenance: Harold F. Smith gave the papers of his wife’s father, Hunter Corbett to the Mission Research Library in 1966. In 1976 the papers were transferred to the Burke Library archives with the closure of the MRL. Access: Archival papers are available to registered readers for consultation by appointment only. Please contact archives staff by email to [email protected], or by postal mail to The Burke Library address on page 1, as far in advance as possible Burke Library staff is available for inquiries or to request a consultation on archival or special collections research.
    [Show full text]