© Copyright 2013 David E. Merrell

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

© Copyright 2013 David E. Merrell © Copyright 2013 David E. Merrell Normative Pluralism in Kyrgyzstan National, Community, and Individual Perspectives David E. Merrell A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2013 Reading Committee Veronica Taylor, Chair Clark L. Lombardi Arzoo Osanloo Scott Radnitz Program Authorized to Offer Degree: University of Washington School of Law University of Washington Abstract Normative Pluralism in Kyrgyzstan National, Community, and Individual Perspectives David E. Merrell Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Veronica Taylor School of Law Current Knowledge: Normative pluralism (plural sources of social ordering) has existed in in Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan ) since pre-Tsarist times. Respected male elders (aksakals), for example, led nomadic groups where customary laws prevailed and sedentary groups where Islamic laws prevailed. During Tsarist times, Kyrgyz aksakal elders’ courts processed disputes alongside Islamic and Russian courts. The Soviets abolished such courts. In post-Soviet times, Kyrgyzstan incorporated a reinvented version of Kyrgyz aksakal courts into the state judicial system. Today, however, some people reject their authority. This state manipulation and popular rejection of a Kyrgyz normative order reflects how majority populations shape normative pluralism in Kyrgyzstan. Research Gap: Most English-language works explore normative pluralism in Kyrgyzstan from a state / majority perspective (e.g. Tsarist, Soviet, and Kyrgyzstani manipulation of majority Kyrgyz aksakal elders’ councils). Few studies explore how minority groups or women shape normative pluralism. Therefore, several research questions remain unanswered. Do minority groups in post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan maintain their own normative orders? Do they rely upon male elders as sources of authority? If so, do some people now reject their authority and why? Do women also act as sources of authority? Contribution of this Dissertation: Based on original fieldwork, this dissertation helps to answer these questions on a national, community, and individual level for minority Uyghurs in post-Soviet northern Kyrgyzstan. Part I explores how the “Ittipak” Uyghur Society of Kyrgyzstan created and maintains throughout Kyrgyzstan a normative order based on respected male Uyghur elders. Part II explores why a community of Uyghurs in Toshtemir City (pseudonym) rejected that order in their city in northern Kyrgyzstan. It argues that the rejection occurred due to a normative cleavage between the two groups. Part III explores how one prominent Uyghur Muslim woman in Toshtemir exerts normative authority in the way that she mediates bride kidnapping cases. Conclusion: A better understanding of how Uyghurs shape norms and normative orders will help complete the picture of normative pluralism in Kyrgyzstan. This is important given ethnic tensions in Kyrgyzstan. It also contributes to a paucity of English-language research on Uyghurs in Central Asia. Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 11 Chapter 1 – The Research Problem ................................................................................. 11 A. Current Knowledge ............................................................................................. 12 B. Research Gap ....................................................................................................... 14 C. Contribution of this Dissertation........................................................................ 14 D. Conclusion ............................................................................................................ 18 Chapter 2 – The Research Site and Population ............................................................... 22 A. Kyrgyzstan ........................................................................................................... 22 B. Toshtemir ............................................................................................................. 26 C. Salomat Alimova .................................................................................................. 37 Part I: How Does Ittipak Create Uyghur Sources of Authority in Kyrgyzstan? ............. 41 Chapter 3 – How Does Ittipak Create and Maintain an Uyghur Normative Order? .. 44 A. The Kyrgyzstan Assembly of Nations ................................................................ 44 B. The “Ittipak” Uyghur Society of Kyrgyzstan ................................................... 45 Chapter 4 – How Does Meshrep Evidence Uyghur-Based Norms? ............................... 59 A. Tetz Religious Meshrep ....................................................................................... 60 B. My first Meshrep .................................................................................................. 61 C. My second Meshrep ............................................................................................. 62 Part II: Why do Toshtemir Uyghurs Reject Ittipak’s Influence? ..................................... 65 Chapter 5 – How do Osh Ceremonies Evidence Neighborhood-Based Norms? .......... 66 A. Socio-Religious Ceremonies in Toshtemir’s Mahalla Neighborhoods ............ 66 B. My Experience Attending Osh Ceremonies for Men ....................................... 70 Chapter 6 – How do Community Organizations Evidence Neighborhood-Based Norms? ................................................................................................................................ 74 A. Quarter Committees ............................................................................................ 74 B. Diaspora Committees .......................................................................................... 76 C. Male Muslim Leaders .......................................................................................... 78 D. Women Muslim Leaders (otin-oyi) ..................................................................... 81 Part III: How Does Salomat Act as a Minority Female Source of Authority? ................ 85 Chapter 7 – What is the Dominant Kyrgyz Norm of Bride Kidnapping in Kyrgyzstan? ........................................................................................................................ 89 A. Bride Kidnapping in Kyrgyzstan ....................................................................... 89 B. The Legality of Bride Kidnapping in Kyrgyzstan ............................................ 90 C. 2013 Postscript (Aynuru Altybaeva) .................................................................. 98 Chapter 8 – How Does Salomat Adopt Kyrgyz Bride Kidnapping Norms?............... 100 A. Salomat’s Bride Kidnaping Cases .................................................................... 100 B. Uzbek / Uyghur Kidnappings in Northern Kyrgyzstan ................................. 106 Chapter 9 – How Does Salomat Attempt to Shape Kyrgyz Bride Kidnapping Norms? ............................................................................................................................................ 110 A. Teaching Gender Equality at that Uzbek School ........................................... 111 B. Teaching Gender Equality at Home ................................................................ 118 C. How Muslims Should Process Bride Kidnapping Cases ................................ 119 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 125 Bibliography ......................................................................................................................... 133 Appendix A: Table of Participant Observations............................................................... 140 Appendix B: Table of Archival Documents ....................................................................... 142 Appendix C: Joint Ethnography of Ittipak ....................................................................... 144 Appendix D: Table of Respondents .................................................................................... 148 Preface Where are the White Beards? Originally I intended to study how Uzbek mahalla (Central Asian urban neighborhood) leaders process disputes in Osh, Kyrgyzstan. My expectation was that mahalla neighborhood committees of respected male elders (aksakals, literally “white beards”) process disputes.1 In the power vacuum after the 2010 revolution in Kyrgyzstan, however, ethnic violence broke out between Kyrgyz and Uzbek populations in southern Kyrgyzstan and Osh. Thus, I moved my research site to Toshtemir City (pseudonym) in northern Kyrgyzstan where Uzbeks also live in mahalla neighborhoods. On my first day in Toshtemir, however, I began to realize that most people there no longer use mahalla neighborhood elders to process disputes.2 My Uzbek teacher, Salomat Alimova (pseudonym) confirmed this phenomenon, as did most people I later spoke with in Toshtemir. Ranjbar confirms it in other parts of the country.3 Therefore, I asked myself, “Where are the white beards and do women influence normative ordering?” In my search for white beard dispute processing and in my lengthy discussions with Salomat, an Uyghur woman, I discovered a few examples of how Uyghurs shape normative pluralism (plural sources of social ordering) in Kyrgyzstan.
Recommended publications
  • CENTRAL ASIA in the HISTORY of the MUSLIM EAST Yuri Bregel
    CENTRALASIA IN THE HISTORY OF THE MUSLIMEAST by Yuri Bregel Institute of Asian and African Affairs The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Occasional Paper #20 THE ROLE OF CENTRALASIA IN THE HISTORY OF THE MUSLIMEAST by Yuri Bregel Institute of Asian and African Affairs The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Occasional Paper #20 February 1980 Afghanistan Council The Asia Society 112 East 64th Street New York City .. Introduction The present paper was read at the Center for Middle Eastern Studies, Harvard University, on 5 April, 1978, and for the second time, in Hebrew with some alterations, at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem on 6 June, 1978. The subject of it is very general. Though it was proposed to me by the Center for Middle Eastern Studies and, therefore, it is the Center that is to be blamed first, I am by no means trying to decline the responsibility for this choice. Perhaps it may be useful to discuss some ~e!leral fc.cts and opir:ir:,:ns concerning the place of Central Asia in the history of the Islamic world and the role of some historical movements which originated in this region during the Isla.mic period. It may be worthwhile for a historian of the Middle East, who is sometimes too fascinated by the great imperial past~ or present - of Turkey, Iran or Abu Dhabi 1 to pay attention to such. a marginal area as Central Asia. It also may be of use for a historian of Central l'.sia, who is usually so busy tackling numerous unstudied and unresolved problems of the region's history that he does not try to place them in some broader perspective and to realize that he can claim an equal place in the .sun with bis colleague studying the Shurubiya or the Abbasid revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov Selected Works of Chokan Valikhanov
    SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV CHOKAN OF WORKS SELECTED SELECTED WORKS OF CHOKAN VALIKHANOV Pioneering Ethnographer and Historian of the Great Steppe When Chokan Valikhanov died of tuberculosis in 1865, aged only 29, the Russian academician Nikolai Veselovsky described his short life as ‘a meteor flashing across the field of oriental studies’. Set against his remarkable output of official reports, articles and research into the history, culture and ethnology of Central Asia, and more important, his Kazakh people, it remains an entirely appropriate accolade. Born in 1835 into a wealthy and powerful Kazakh clan, he was one of the first ‘people of the steppe’ to receive a Russian education and military training. Soon after graduating from Siberian Cadet Corps at Omsk, he was taking part in reconnaissance missions deep into regions of Central Asia that had seldom been visited by outsiders. His famous mission to Kashgar in Chinese Turkestan, which began in June 1858 and lasted for more than a year, saw him in disguise as a Tashkent mer- chant, risking his life to gather vital information not just on current events, but also on the ethnic make-up, geography, flora and fauna of this unknown region. Journeys to Kuldzha, to Issyk-Kol and to other remote and unmapped places quickly established his reputation, even though he al- ways remained inorodets – an outsider to the Russian establishment. Nonetheless, he was elected to membership of the Imperial Russian Geographical Society and spent time in St Petersburg, where he was given a private audience by the Tsar. Wherever he went he made his mark, striking up strong and lasting friendships with the likes of the great Russian explorer and geographer Pyotr Petrovich Semyonov-Tian-Shansky and the writer Fyodor Dostoyevsky.
    [Show full text]
  • UYGHUR STUDIES in CENTRAL ASIA: a Historical Review
    UYGHUR STUDIES IN CENTRAL ASIA 3 ABLET KAMALOV UYGHUR STUDIES IN CENTRAL ASIA: A Historical Review INTRODUCTION The Uyghurs, a Turkic people comprising a major part of the population of the Xinjiang-Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR), China, also have sizable communities in the former Soviet Central Asian Republics, espe- cially in Kazakhstan, where they numbered 220,000 in 1999 (altogether the Uyghur population in the newly independent states numbers more than 300,000). The Central Asian Uyghur community played a signifi- cant role in the Uyghur nation-building process as well as in Soviet- Chinese relations during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. The Soviet authorities used the Uyghurs as a tool in their policy toward Xinjiang (Eastern Turkistan) and for that purpose provided special sup- port for the development of Uyghur culture in Central Asia. A significant part of that policy was the development of Uyghur studies in Central Asia, particularly in Kazakhstan, which became a cultural center for the Soviet Uyghurs. Uyghur studies covers mostly the research done in the sphere of language, literature, history, and culture (art, music, etc). This article will examine the history of Uyghur studies in Soviet Central Asia and outline its trends. 4 KAMALOV THE MAIN STAGES The Initial Stage (1920–1945) The earliest research on Uyghurs conducted in Central Asia exhibited mostly a practical character. The purpose was to pursue specific goals of Soviet national policy aimed at the creation of new socialist “nations” in the region. The Uyghurs, along with other peoples, were recognized by the Soviet state as a “nation” during the period of national delimitation and demarcation in Central Asia during the early 1920s, just after the establishment of Bolshevik power.
    [Show full text]
  • Constructing Post-Soviet Identities. an Analysis of Representations of Bride Kidnapping in Kyrgyz Cinema
    Constructing post-soviet identities. An analysis of Representations of bride kidnapping in Kyrgyz cinema. Sandra Mack Central Asia has experienced two major transformations of society in the 20 th century. Firstly, the establishment of Soviet rule was accompanied by an attack against the traditional Muslim and (semi)- nomadic society. Secondly, with the collapse of the Soviet Union the key ideologies on the liberation of the Soviet women and nations have been ‘dissolved’ overnight. Indeed, the Post-Soviet struggle for identities is most evident in two areas, which had been a main target of Soviet ideologies: gender and ethnicity. The paper examines how contemporary Kyrgyz cinema supports and encourages images of bride kidnapping as an act of producing both ethnic and gender identities that fill the gap left by the sudden break-up of the Soviet Union. This analysis of local popular media reveals the discrepancies between local discourses of tradition and the official government policy attempting to present Kyrgyzstan as a modern democracy. Even though bride kidnappings are prohibited by law and have been throughout the Soviet and Post- Soviet period, the practice is still rampant and today even more popular than during the Soviet period (Kleinbach et. al. 2005). Research has shown that this strong and sudden increase is a marker of cultural change of the Post-Soviet Era (Borbieva 2012). Besides dominating reconfigurations of gender roles in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan, the impact of gendered constructions of national identity should not be underestimated (Handrahan 2004, Yuval-Davis 1993). Both gender and national identities are continuously re-visited and re-invented through the repetition of acts, practices and habits, a big part of which takes place through mass media (Bhaba 1990; Butler 1997; Parker 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing Violent Extremism in Kyrgyzstan
    UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org SPECIAL REPORT 2301 Constitution Ave., NW • Washington, DC 20037 • 202.457.1700 • fax 202.429.6063 ABOUT THE REPORT Jacob Zenn and Kathleen Kuehnast This report offers perspectives on the national and regional dynamics of violent extremism with respect to Kyrgyzstan. Derived from a study supported by the United States Institute of Peace (USIP) to explore the potential for violent extremism in Central Asia, it is based on extensive interviews and a Preventing Violent countrywide Peace Game with university students at Kyrgyz National University in June 2014. Extremism in Kyrgyzstan ABOUT THE AUTHORS Jacob Zenn is an analyst on Eurasian and African affairs, a legal adviser on international law and best practices related to civil society and freedom of association, and a nonresident research Summary fellow at the Center of Shanghai Cooperation Organization Studies in China, the Center of Security Programs in Kazakhstan, • Kyrgyzstan, having twice overthrown autocratic leaders in violent uprisings, in 2005 and again and The Jamestown Foundation in Washington, DC. Dr. Kathleen in 2010, is the most politically open and democratic country in Central Asia. Kuehnast is a sociocultural anthropologist and an expert on • Many Kyrgyz observers remain concerned about the country’s future. They fear that underlying Kyrgyzstan, where she conducted field work in the early 1990s. An adviser on the Central Asia Fellows Program at the socioeconomic conditions and lack of public services—combined with other factors, such as Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington drug trafficking from Afghanistan, political manipulation, regional instability in former Soviet University, she is a member of the Council on Foreign Union countries and Afghanistan, and foreign-imported religious ideologies—create an envi- Relations and has directed the Center for Gender and ronment in which violent extremism can flourish.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Eurasian Studies Society Fourth Annual Conference October
    Central Eurasian Studies Society Fourth Annual Conference October 2- 5, 2003 Hosted by: Program on Central Asia and the Caucasus Davis Center for Russian and Eurasian Studies Harvard University Cambridge, Mass., USA Table of Contents Conference Schedule ................................................................................... 1 Film Program ......................................................................................... 2 Panel Grids ................................................................................................ 3 List of Panels .............................................................................................. 5 Schedule of Panels ...................................................................................... 7 Friday • Session I • 9:00 am-10:45 am ..................................................... 7 Friday • Session II • 11:00 am-12:45 pm .................................................. 9 Friday • Session III • 2:00 pm-3:45 pm .................................................. 11 Friday • Session IV • 4:00 pm-5:45 pm .................................................. 12 Saturday • Session I • 9:00 am-10:45 am ............................................... 14 Saturday • Session II • 11:00 am-12:45 pm ............................................ 16 Saturday • Session III • 2:00 pm-3:45 pm .............................................. 18 Saturday • Session IV • 4:00 pm-6:30 pm .............................................. 20 Sunday • Session I • 9:00 am-10:45 am ................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prosecuting Bride Kidnapping: the Law Isn't Enough; Aligning Cultural Norms with the Law
    Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law Volume 53 Issue 1 Article 16 2021 Prosecuting Bride Kidnapping: The Law Isn't Enough; Aligning Cultural Norms with the Law Alexandria McKenna Lundberg Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil Part of the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Alexandria McKenna Lundberg, Prosecuting Bride Kidnapping: The Law Isn't Enough; Aligning Cultural Norms with the Law, 53 Case W. Res. J. Int'l L. 475 (2021) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/jil/vol53/iss1/16 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Journals at Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law by an authorized administrator of Case Western Reserve University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 53 (2021) Prosecuting Bride Kidnapping: The Law Isn’t Enough; Aligning Cultural Norms with the Law Alexandria McKenna Lundberg* Abstract The struggle between cultural and legal norms suggests that more than a change in law is necessary to change cultural practices. If law enforcement is not influenced by existing cultural norms, the law may have little effect in prosecuting bride kidnapping. This Note, focusing on Kyrgyzstan, argues that current legal responses to bride kidnapping are insufficient to protect vulnerable women. Instead, a more comprehensive strategy—like that of addressing female genital mutilation—would better address the factors and settings that create circumstances of vulnerability and violence. Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................... 475 Table of Contents .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Zhanat Kundakbayeva the HISTORY of KAZAKHSTAN FROM
    MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN THE AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATIONAL UNIVERSITY Zhanat Kundakbayeva THE HISTORY OF KAZAKHSTAN FROM EARLIEST PERIOD TO PRESENT TIME VOLUME I FROM EARLIEST PERIOD TO 1991 Almaty "Кazakh University" 2016 ББК 63.2 (3) К 88 Recommended for publication by Academic Council of the al-Faraby Kazakh National University’s History, Ethnology and Archeology Faculty and the decision of the Editorial-Publishing Council R e v i e w e r s: doctor of historical sciences, professor G.Habizhanova, doctor of historical sciences, B. Zhanguttin, doctor of historical sciences, professor K. Alimgazinov Kundakbayeva Zh. K 88 The History of Kazakhstan from the Earliest Period to Present time. Volume I: from Earliest period to 1991. Textbook. – Almaty: "Кazakh University", 2016. - &&&& p. ISBN 978-601-247-347-6 In first volume of the History of Kazakhstan for the students of non-historical specialties has been provided extensive materials on the history of present-day territory of Kazakhstan from the earliest period to 1991. Here found their reflection both recent developments on Kazakhstan history studies, primary sources evidences, teaching materials, control questions that help students understand better the course. Many of the disputable issues of the times are given in the historiographical view. The textbook is designed for students, teachers, undergraduates, and all, who are interested in the history of the Kazakhstan. ББК 63.3(5Каз)я72 ISBN 978-601-247-347-6 © Kundakbayeva Zhanat, 2016 © al-Faraby KazNU, 2016 INTRODUCTION Данное учебное пособие is intended to be a generally understandable and clearly organized outline of historical processes taken place on the present day territory of Kazakhstan since pre-historic time.
    [Show full text]
  • They Can't Send Me Back
    They Can’t Send Me Back: Uyghur Asylum Seekers in Europe A Report by the Uyghur Human Rights Project “There is no greater sorrow on earth than the loss of one’s native land.” - Euripides 2 Table of Contents Executive summary .............................................................................................................4 Methodology .......................................................................................................................7 Why Uyghurs flee ...............................................................................................................8 International conventions and EU policy ..........................................................................21 How Uyghurs fled .............................................................................................................34 Uyghur asylum seekers in Europe.....................................................................................45 Recommendations .............................................................................................................60 Acknowledgments .............................................................................................................62 3 Executive summary “I’m hopeless now. What will I do? Where will I stay? I can’t work. What groups should I go to? I’ve heard some Uyghurs have been sent to the street when their cases have been closed. I am a woman. What will I do? If I were younger, I would be fine, but at my age, it will be difficult.” Uyghur asylum seeker in the Netherlands,
    [Show full text]
  • Models of Ala-Kachuu
    Page 1 of 38 FORCED MARRIAGE: Models of Ala-kachuu Charles Becker Department of Economics, Duke University Susan Steiner Leibniz Universität Hannover and IZA Lin Zhao Department of Economics, Duke University For presentation at the Association for Comparative Economic Studies sessions Allied Social Science Associations Annual Meetings Philadelphia, PA January 4-7, 2018 Abstract This paper provides an economic analysis of the practice of bride abduction based on a neoclassical model of family fertility and consumption. The point of reference is the Kyrgyz Republic in Central Asia, though the practice is not unique to Central Asia. We show that social acceptance of bride kidnapping is rational behavior for an elder generation that values offspring more than the younger generation. It is also rational for prospective grooms seeking to lower wedding costs, and for some potential brides who seek to increase their chances of getting married. Keywords: Forced Marriage, Bride Kidnapping, Marriage Models, Sorting Models, Kyrgyzstan JEL classification: I12, J12 Acknowledgements: We are indebted to many colleagues and associates for discussions of modeling and forced marriage. Particular recognition with respect to the theoretical aspect of modeling is due to Damir Esenaliev, Aliya Ibragimova, Joshua Jacobs, Bakhrom Mirkasimov, Akylai Muktarbek kyzy, and Kani Omurzakova, We are also grateful for comments received on related presentations at Duke University, the 3rd annual Life in Kyrgyzstan conference, the New Economics School, and Stockholm University’s SITE 25th anniversary conference. All errors, omissions, and faulty interpretations remain our own. Becker, Steiner & Zhao Bride Kidnapping 31-Dec-17 Page 2 of 38 I. INTRODUCTION Although conventional “love marriage” is perceived as the standard type of marriage in modern societies, especially among the middle and upper classes, other types of marriage still play important role in forming families elsewhere.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Historical Overview: Social Order in Mā Warāʾ Al-Nahr
    2. Historical Overview: Social Order in Mā Warāʾ al-Nahr With the beginning of Uzbek dominance in southern Central Asia around the year 1500, a fresh wave of Turkic nomads was brought in and added a new element to the populace of the region.1 Initially the establishment of Uzbek rule took the form of a nomadic conquest aiming to gain access to the irrigated and urban areas of Transoxania. The following sedentarization of the Uzbek newcomers was a long-term process that took three and perhaps even more centuries. In the course of time, the conquerors mixed with those Turkic groups that had already been settled in the Oxus region for hundreds of years, and, of course, with parts of the sedentary Persian-speaking population.2 Based on the secondary literature, this chapter is devoted to the most important historical developments in Mā Warāʾ al-Nahr since the beginning of the sixteenth century. By recapitulating the milestones of Uzbek rule, I want to give a brief overview of the historical background for those who are not familiar with Central Asian history. I will explore the most significant elements of the local social order at the highest level of social integration: the rulers and ruling clans. In doing so, I will spotlight the political dynamics resulting from the dialectics of cognitive patterns and institutions that make up local worldviews and their impact on the process of institutionalizing Abū’l-Khairid authority. The major focus will be on patronage. As the current state of knowledge shows, this institution was one of the cornerstones of the social order in the wider region until the Mongol invasion.
    [Show full text]
  • Tonyukuk and Turkic State Ideology “Mangilik
    THE TONYUKUK AND AN ANCIENT TURK’S STATE IDEOLOGY OF “MANGILIK EL” PJAEE, 17 (6) (2020) THE TONYUKUK AND AN ANCIENT TURK’S STATE IDEOLOGY OF “MANGILIK EL” Nurtas B. SMAGULOV, PhD student of the of the Department of Kazakhstan History, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazakhstan, [email protected] Aray K. ZHUNDIBAYEVA, PhD, Head of the Department of Kazakh literature, accociate professor of the Department of Kazakh literature, Shakarim state University of Semey (SSUS), (State University named after Shakarim of city Semey), Kazakhstan, [email protected] Satay M. SIZDIKOV, Doctor of historical science, professor of the Department of Turkology, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, Kazakhstan, [email protected] Arap S. YESPENBETOV, Doctor of philological science, professor of the Department of Kazakh literature, Shakarim state University of Semey (SSUS), (State University named after Shakarim of city Semey), Kazakhstan, [email protected] Ardak K. KAPYSHEV, Candidate of historical science, accociate professor of the Department of International Relations, History and Social Work, Abay Myrzkhmetov Kokshetau University, Kazakhstan, [email protected] Nurtas B. SMAGULOV, Aray K. ZHUNDIBAYEVA, Satay M. SIZDIKOV, Arap S. YESPENBETOV, Ardak K. KAPYSHEV: The Tonyukuk And An Ancient Turk’s State Ideology Of “Mangilik El” -- Palarch’s Journal Of Archaeology Of Egypt/Egyptology 17(6). ISSN 1567-214x ABSTRACT Purpose of the study. Studying and evaluating the activities of Tonykuk, who was the state adviser to the Second Turkic Kaganate, the main ideologist responsible for the ideological activities of the Kaganate from 682 to 745, is an urgent problem of historical science. In the years 646-725 he worked as an adviser on political and cultural issues of the three Kagan.
    [Show full text]