DOCSLIB.ORG

Public Consultation Responses Council Response

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Public Consultation Responses Council Response Council Public Consultation Responses Response Lack of numbering of sections or pages makes referencing difficult. Vision and Objectives: Split objective 3 and include a specific box on cycle safety including that the Council encourages cyclists to use of helmets and high visibility clothing and that cyclists must use the Public Highway in observance of the law and the Highway Code (noted this is in S3.8 but deserves mention in main body, not just stuck away in an Not an appendix). objective Mention is made of filtered neighbourhoods. Under challenges against this include: ‘If diversion of traffic from filtered neighbourhoods causes increased congestion and / or has an environmental impact elsewhere mitigation of this will need consideration’ or words to that effect. Please edit : Review opportunities for extension of 20mph zones in residential estates The in school programmes we carry out are under the banner of Eagle Eye and Bikeability. I’ve asked Ian Cook to review this section to make sure it is accurate. There is an issue in that the likes of Bikeability promote use of high visibility clothing and use of cycle helmets whilst the GM Mayor’s Challenge Fund promoters do not appear to want this to be encouraged. Keep as is Action Plan: S1.5 maybe include our east-west cycle route from Hazel Grove to Cheadle vis Bramhall Green Action Plan: S3.8 what are we doing to deal with riders of unlit cycles? Cycles either seem to be dazzlingly bright with flashing LED’s which put the Christmas lights to shame or No change totally unlit, wearing black and pretty much invisible. needed Action Plan: S6.1 odd use of colons: rd Education and promotion: Please remove the reference to Step Outside in the 3 sentence of the first paragraph and incorporate it as set out here: ‘ The majority of Stockport Primary Schools participate in Bikeability cycle training. In addition, Primary Schools receive Road Safety Education including Step Outside pedestrian training. Primary Schools are encouraged to look at increasing walking and cycling through initiatives such as Park and Stride.’ Education and Promotion: at the end of the first paragraph it says ‘In addition, most Schools participate in Bikeability’. This statement should be given more prominence and be incorporated in to the previous sentence to read as above. 1 I would have either ‘walking and cycling’ or ‘cycling and walking’ consistently throughout. I suggest the former as there are far more pedestrians than cyclists. The front cover has three photos with cyclists and one photo with walkers. I suggest equal numbers. And the walking photo shows ramblers rather than utility walkers, eg, people going to school. Agree Check 2 There are many abbreviations in the document. If the aim is to get the public to respond acronyms and and back the programme, we should not be throwing jargon at them. For example, the consider A6MARR – now that it is complete and open – is just the (recently extended) A555. potential Another example is TCAP. glossary 3 No page numbers are shown, but Page 3 has some data – in a confusing range of fonts – which are presumably intended to set the scene. So the page could be titled as such. Is all the data specific to Stockport – or is some national? 42.3% is amazingly precise and contrasts with ‘1 in 5’. 4 The ‘Potential Options’ sections really refer to potential actions to deliver the strategy. Reword Some of them are more than potential – they are on-going and won’t be stopped, eg, 'potential training. options' 5 I suggest a section early on saying that Stockport works with other GM authorities and This was with the GM mayor and TfGM’s/the mayor’s walking & cycling people. The joint working is already in there especially relevant for the Stockport Gateways and GM-wide actions such as Beelines. This but no harm to would be a good place to explain the various abbreviations and jargon terms. reiterate 6 The text refers to Appendices but I could not find any. * mentioning specific examples where a permeable neighbourhood scheme could be No change trialled or extended – the Heatons? – this would make it more concrete needed this is already in the * committing to reviewing local centres for W&C, looking at routes, crossings, cycle actionplan - no parking, etc, in a rolling programme change needed * committing to reviewing routes to stations and other generators such as big schools etc. as above 1 walking pic and 3 cycling pics! Should be more equal. Walking pics should include utility walking, eg, to/from school or station, and not just hiking. agree Tab says 'Contents' but heading is 'Exec Summ'. p.2 Delete 'a', as it's 'networks' (plural) p.3 Is all data specific to Stockport? Or is some national? Sources? Dates? p.4 Drop the first three full-stops Council priority Obj 5. Why just the town centre? Surely for business parks etc as well. Also schools and is the town colleges. centre SEMMMS usually has a final S. But abbreviations are not self-explanatory! Glossary 'Potential' just means 'which could be achieved' 'LA' is jargon. Just say 'local' Covered in the appendices under the policy section but no harm to include in the 'Made to Move' & 'Beelines' are not self-explanatory. main doc more Middlewood Way not rated as 'high quality'? p.10 This box is really about delivery methods - getting the job done, so, actions. No colon Only possible needed on heading. actions p. 10 'Undertake audit of' just means 'Audit'. Can reword whole point as 'Audit existing network to identify necessary improvements and prioritise in implementation programme.' agree p.11 We seem to go from Fig 1 to Fig 3 with no Fig 2. But we don't need Fig numbers as there is no more than one on a page. p.11 Insert 'at' before the Stockport Gateways p. 12 Meaning 2018? Need to retitle these boxes but don't agree they are p. 12 This is about delivery - actions, not just potential options. actions p. 12 CUG and TPT are not self-explanatory. p. 13 This is about delivery and actions not just potential options. As above Don't think this needs updating - extra words just to say what p.14 Permeable road closures, which prevent rat-running by motor vehicles while is already in permitting movements by pedestrians and cyclists there No change p.14 Invisible signs are not recommended. needed p.16 Pic does not show bike park in use - looks empty. Turn round and photo the stands at the station - better used. Agree No change p.17 Apparently S in S1.1 etc means short-term. needed p.17 Obj1 refers to maintenance but there is no action for it. Need to maintain & improve existing paths, preventing flooding, cutting overhanging vegetation, maintaining lights, preventing joy-riding etc. Agree No change p.17 S1.5 Existing canals - are there any proposed canals? needed p.17 S1.5 A6MARR is a scheme name but the scheme is now done and open. Just say A555. Agreed update p.17 S1.7 Oh dear. Principle. p.17 S1.9 The wording seems coded. It mainly means 'consider changing selected Update to footpaths to bridleways, along with physical improvements where needed'. simplify p.18 S2.5 Wordy. Just say 'to accommodate a' Agree update p.19 S3.1 Delete full-stop. p.19 S3.7 Work with enforcement opportunities? p.19 S4/5.1 Mapping and auditing do not create. Change 'create' to 'identify potential'. Agree update p.20 S6.1 Delete colons. p.21 M1.1 Design and cost? p.24 NHT means...? It is relevant p.24 National Travel Survey has a few thousand participants across the whole country. It data though won't pick up small changes at local level due to relatively small network changes or used by all publicity actions. authorities Remove the words "and to improve safety" from Objective 3 No - keep as is This is already in there - no Use planning powers to ensure walking and cycling links in/to and from new development change needed The Peak District National Park Authority supports the aims of the Stockport Walking and Good - no Cycling Plan, to encourage more journeys by cycle and on foot to bring a wide range of changes benefits to residents of, and visitors to Stockport needed Therefore, we welcome the commitment within the Plan to look at the routes that cross gateways into Stockport and to work with partners to ensure the continuity and quality of routes beyond the Stockport MBC boundary (Action 6.1). We appreciate that it is not always easy to encourage other authorities to deliver schemes that they see as bringing marginal benefit to their organisations. However, in the case of walking and cycling routes, the majority of local authorities recognise the benefit of active travel both in terms of health generally; and for improving air quality and reducing carbon emissions. A partnership approach can deliver benefits for both parties whilst sharing costs and Good - no opening access to third party contributions. The Pedal Peak II project clearly demonstrated changes the benefits and ability to draw down funds through partnership working. needed I look forward to reading the final version of the Plan. I am aware that some of the Good - no suggested gateway routes extend into the Peak District National Park. Please contact me if changes you believe that the Authority can be of assistance in moving forward with such schemes needed Page 12, Potential Options – Derbyshire County Council offer cycle safety training for adults who live or work in Derbyshire (Derbyshire County Rider scheme1).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adult Social Care Portfolio
    Date: October 2019 Version 1.0 Approved by DM 1 ECONOMY AND REGENERATION PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW Portfolio Summary Since launching my portfolio agreement back in July, we have made good progress in several areas and seen major development in potentially achieving better public transport. The Mayoral Development Corporation (MDC) is now a reality and the prospect of 3,500 new homes, many of which will be affordable, is now on the horizon. Working with Homes England and with cabinet agreeing to a £100m loan facility to ‘kick-start’ development, this represents a significant period in the regeneration of our town centre and realising the true potential our borough has. Indeed, with the Mailbox – aka the old Sorting Office – nearing completion, the first project within the MDC boundary is almost upon us, providing 119 new homes. Our work within the Market Place is bearing fruit: footfall is up 6.3% compared to the previous year, above the forecast of 5%. Of course, the success of the Produce Hall is central to the Market Place’s resurgence and I make no apology for being a vocal supporter of it. Of course, there is still much to do; I am still mindful that people want to see a more comprehensive outdoor offering. I do, too, but this must be sustainable for the long-term: we only need to look at what recently happened in Rochdale to understand that markets are a very delicate area within retail. Occupancy within Stockport Town Centre is on course to meet our 75% target and we are hopeful we will meet our target of 300 independent businesses within the Town Centre this year.
    [Show full text]
  • LSDA Achievement Strategies by Paul Martinez
    LSDA reports Raising achievement at Levels 1 and 2 Paul Martinez Published by the Contents Learning and Skills Development Agency. Introduction 1 www.LSDA.org.uk Learner issues 4 Feedback should be sent to: Teaching issues 7 Information Services Learning and Skills Development Agency College issues 12 Regent Arcade House, 19–25 Argyll Street Conclusions 15 London W1F 7LS. Tel 020 7297 9000 Appendix 1: Case study colleges 17 Fax 020 7297 9001 Appendix 2: References and 17 [email protected] suggestions for further reading Registered with the Charity Commissioners. Editor: Jennifer Rhys Designer: Dave Shaw Printed in the UK ISBN 1 85338 727 4 ©Learning and Skills Development Agency 2002 A1228/01/02/3000 You are welcome to copy this publication for internal use within your organisation. Otherwise, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, electrical, chemical, optical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission of the copyright owner. Further information For further information on the issues discussed in this publication please contact: Anna Reisenberger Quality Improvement Programmes Manager Learning and Skills Development Agency Regent Arcade House, 19–25 Argyll Street London W1F 7LS. Tel 020 7297 9000 [email protected] Acknowledgements Thanks are due to the teachers, tutors, support workers and managers in over 20 colleges whose work is reported here. Without their work there could be no report. I would also like to thank my colleagues Sally Faraday, Lynn Hull and Anna Reisenberger, who kindly commented on an earlier draft.
    [Show full text]
  • Economy & Regeneration
    Date 26 June 2018 Version 1.0 (Cabinet) Approved by KB ECONOMY & REGENERATION PORTFOLIO HOLDER’S INTRODUCTION This is my third annual Portfolio Agreement, which summarises the Economy & Regeneration Portfolio’s work programme and its intended outcomes for the next 12 months. The 2017/18 Annual Report was published last month and this Agreement sets out how we will build on the work described in that report to make our Borough an even better place to live, visit, work and do business. We are working hard to ensure that the Borough’s economy continues to grow, but we are now placing particular emphasis on ensuring this growth is inclusive growth – growth that benefits all sections of our community. Work and skills issues are a key part of this work and earlier this year we held a Work & Skills Commission involving a series of workshops with employers, workers & jobseekers (including young people) and educators & trainers. These aimed to identify the priorities that we need to focus on to ensure our residents have access to good jobs and our workforce has the skills our employers need. Findings from the Commission will inform a work programme for a new Work & Skills Board and I will report on the Board's work in my regular performance reports. Its work will link with and complement work underway in the Reform & Governance portfolio that is investigating factors that seem to trap some of our residents in poverty. Finding and sustaining a good job can be the key to escaping poverty, but ill health can be a barrier to employment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2003 No. 481 HIGHER and FURTHER EDUCATION, TRAINING and EMPLOYMENT Education (Listed Bodies) Order (Northern Ireland) 2003
    STATUTORY RULES OF NORTHERN IRELAND 2003 No. 481 HIGHER AND FURTHER EDUCATION, TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT Education (Listed Bodies) Order (Northern Ireland) 2003 Made ----- 19th November 2003 Coming into operation 30th December 2003 The Department for Employment and Learning(a), in exercise of the powers conferred by Article 5(2) of the Education (Unrecognised Degrees) (Northern Ireland) Order 1988(b) and now exercisable by it(c) and of every other power enabling it in that behalf, hereby makes the following Order: Citation, commencement and interpretation 1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Education (Listed Bodies) Order (Northern Ireland) 2003 and shall come into operation on 30th December 2003. (2) In this Order “the Department” means the Department for Employment and Learning. Listed bodies 2. For the purposes of Article 5(2) of the Education (Unrecognised Degrees) (Northern Ireland) Order 1988, the Department hereby publishes the list set out in the Schedule as the list including the name of every body which appears to it to fall for the time being within Article 5(3) of that Order. Revocation 3. The Education (Listed Bodies) Order (Northern Ireland) 2000(d) is hereby revoked. Sealed with the Official Seal of the Department for Employment and Learning on 19th November 2003. (L.S.) D. S. McAuley A Senior Officer of the Department for Employment and Learning (a) Formerly the Department of Higher and Further Education, Training and Employment, see S.I. 1999/283 (N.I. 1) and the Department for Employment and Learning Act (Northern Ireland) 2001 (c. 15) (b) S.I. 1988/89 (N.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Regeneration
    Portfolio Performance and Resourc e Report – Final Update Report 2011/12 REGENERATION - OVERVIEW Portfolio Holder’s Comments This year, work on the Grand Central site has significantly progressed, with the appointment of Muse Developments Ltd as development partner and a £5m grant secured to upgrade the parking provision at Stockport Station. We are attracting more people into the town centre and reported footfall is increasing. Gap Outlet, Primark, H&M, Big Yellow Storage and Infiniti have all opened this year in and around the town centre and the former Woolworths store is now occupied by Costa Coffee, River Island and Deichmann Shoes. We are making good progress in creating new homes in the town centre, with a good start on site at Hopes Carr. There have also been two significant lettings of office space at Park Square to Jacobs and Christies. Performance Indicators reflect the continued work within this Portfolio, remaining stable despite current economic challenges. Work continues to address unemployment and jobs continue to be created and safeguarded. Cllr Kevin Hogg Regeneration Portfolio Holder Executive Summary Tackling youth unemployment has been a focus at local, regional and national level bringing with it an array of new initiatives. Work to develop the Greater Manchester Commitment to Youth Employment has proved successful and will create up to 195 Pre-Apprenticeship employment opportunities for young unemployed Stockport residents. The Enhanced Next Step project in the Priority Areas exceeded its target of number of people to support by 28%. This year, funding secured totals £8.859m and total funds supported is £17.9million, additional pipeline funding includes further Heritage Lottery Funding for the Future Skills project and for physical regeneration projects in the town centre.
    [Show full text]
  • LDF Core Strategy Preferred Options
    Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council Local Development Framework Core Strategy DPD March 2011 If you would like this leaflet in large print, on audio tape, in Braille or on disk, please contact: Planning Policy Team Communities, Regeneration & Environment Directorate Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council FREEPOST Stockport SK1 3YQ Telephone: 0161 474 4395 Fax: 0161 474 4337 Contents List of Policies 2 1 Introduction 4 1.1 What is the Core Strategy? 4 1.2 What does it do? 4 1.3 How has it been prepared? 5 2 The Need for Change 6 2.1 Current Picture of the Borough – The Spatial Portrait 6 2.2 Challenges for the Future – What are the issues? 19 2.3 Other Plans, Evidence and Influences 20 3 The Strategy 31 3.1 Future Picture of the Borough - Vision 31 3.2 Objectives 33 3.3 Strategy 37 3.3.1 Key Diagram 38 3.3.2 OVERARCHING PRINCIPLES: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - ADDRESSING CLIMATE CHANGE AND INEQUALITIES 42 3.3.3 PROVIDING A DECENT HOME FOR EVERYONE 58 3.3.4 ACCESS TO SERVICES 72 3.3.5 ACCOMMODATING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 92 3.3.6 SAFEGUARDING AND IMPROVING THE ENVIRONMENT 101 3.3.7 TRANSPORT 128 3.3.8 Stockport Town Centre Strategic Location 140 3.3.9 Woodford Aerodrome Opportunity Site 145 A Glossary 149 B Superseded policies 159 C Additional Information for Core Policies and Development Management Policies 163 C.1 Energy Opportunities Plan 163 C.2 Energy Efficiency Checklist 164 C.3 Recreational Open Space 165 C.4 The general distribution of Green Infrastructure 169 2 List of Policies List of Policies Policy Location Core Policy CS1 'OVERARCHING
    [Show full text]
  • Stockport Retail Study Update, 2014 Volume 1
    STOCKPORT RETAIL STUDY UPDATE On behalf of Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council August 2014 FINAL REPORT Volume 1 – Main Text Stockport Retail Study Update CONTENTS 1 INSTRUCTIONS, CONTEXTUAL BACKGROUND AND OUTLINE OF REPORT 1 Instructions ................................................................................................................................. 1 New Survey Evidence ................................................................................................................ 3 Updated Data Inputs ................................................................................................................... 3 Price Base .................................................................................................................................. 4 The Earlier Stockport Shopping and Leisure Study ................................................................... 4 Outline of Report ......................................................................................................................... 5 2 NATIONAL POLICY CONTEXT 7 The National Planning Policy Framework (the NPPF) ............................................................... 7 The National Planning Practice Guidance (the NPPG) .............................................................. 8 3 RECENT AND FUTURE CHANGES IN RETAILING 11 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 11 Retail Expenditure Growth per Capita.....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ridge Danyers College
    Ridge Danyers College CONTENTS Basic information about the college Part A: Summary Information about the college How effective is the college? Quality of provision in curriculum and occupational areas How well is the college led and managed? To what extent is the college educationally and socially inclusive? How well are students and trainees guided and supported? Students' views of the college Other information Part B: The college as a whole Summary of grades awarded to teaching and learning by inspectors Achievement and standards Quality of education and training Leadership and management Part C: Curriculum and occupational areas Science Mathematics Business Computing and information technology Sport, leisure and tourism Health, social and childcare Visual arts Performing arts Humanities Modern languages English and communication studies Foundation (literacy and numeracy) Part D: College data Table 1: Enrolments by level of study and age 2001/02 Table 2: Enrolments by curriculum area and age 2001/02 Table 3: Retention and achievement Table 4: Quality of teaching observed during the inspection by level Basic information about the college Name of college: Ridge Danyers College Type of college: Sixth form college Principal: Christina Cassidy Address of college: Hibbert Lane Marple Stockport SK6 7PA Telephone number: 0161 484 6600 Fax number: 0161 484 6601 Chair of governors: Chris Baker Unique reference number: 130836 Name of reporting inspector: David Dana Date of inspection: 24-28 November 2003 Part A: Summary Information about the college Ridge Danyers College is a sixth form college in the metropolitan borough of Stockport. The college was established in 1995 as a result of a merger between two sixth form colleges.
    [Show full text]
  • ARCHER HOUSE John Street, Stockport Town Centre SK1 3FX
    For Sale Off-Plan Apartments ARCHER HOUSE John Street, Stockport Town Centre SK1 3FX “We really cannot enthuse enough over the location of this development. Situated in the Town Centre’s Business District at a time when one of the largest investment and development growth programs has begun. A truly excellent investment opportunity” ARCHER HOUSE, STOCKPORT TOWN CENTRE, GREATER MANCHESTER – O’Connor Bowden Page 1 of 21 Key Features Location! Location! Location! 70 x 1 Bedroom Apartments from ONLY £83,250 Situated in the Heart of Stockport Town Centre 5 x Studio Apartments from ONLY £63,000 New Off-Plan Investment Properties Located in town’s Business District Completion expected in October 2016 Minutes from Merseyway Shopping Centre Strong Rental Demand from Professionals Tenants Stockport Railway Station (Manchester to London line) Fabulous Urban Views Across – 5 minute walk the Town M60 Motorway Junction 1 Private Car Park with Allocated – 2 minute drive Space Stockport’s Main Hospital Access Control Entrance – 1.8 miles south Contemporary Accommodation Manchester City Centre – 7 miles north White Gloss Kitchens with Integrated Appliances Close to Town Hall and Stockport College Campus Modern designed Bathroom Suites with tiled walls and floors Tenure: 225 Year Leasehold Title Laminate, Carpet and Tiled 10 Year Build Warranty with CRL Flooring Exchange with 25% protected Major Town Centre Investment deposit, less reservation fee and Re-development under way in 2016 RESERVE NOW - £1,000 ARCHER HOUSE, STOCKPORT TOWN CENTRE, GREATER MANCHESTER – O’Connor Bowden Page 2 of 21 ARCHER HOUSE O’Connor Bowden are delighted to offer this fabulous development of 75 off-plan apartments located in the heart of Stockport Town Centre, within the town’s business district.
    [Show full text]
  • Stockport Town Centre Heat Network: Feasibility Study Prepared By:
    Building Engineering Manchester City Council November 2013 Stockport Council Stockport Town Centre Heat Network: Feasibility Study Prepared by: ........................................................... Elena Olloqui ...................................... Principal Consultant ............................ Checked by: ........................................................... Approved by: ..................................................................... Andrew Turton Paul Woods Associate Director Technical Director Stockport Town Centre Heat Network: Feasibility Study Rev No Comments Checked by Approved Date by 1 Draft report ACT PSW 1/11/13 1 New York Street, Manchester M1 4HD Telephone: 0161 601 1700 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No.: 60289952 Date Created: October 2013 This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM Limited and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM Limited, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. The study presents feasibility results for a heat network in the Civic Quarter based on the assumptions set out in this document, but further work will be required to confirm the figures presented here and to design the scheme in detail. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM Limited. Table
    [Show full text]
  • Stockport Christian CROMWELL STREET 38 War
    The Queens (PH) Subway ST MARY'S WAY 9 VMS DANIEL'S LANE 003 5 3a 3 WELLINGTON ROAD NORTH KNIGHTSBRIDGE LB 001 Shelter LITTLE EGERTON STREET 002 KEY: Lighting Gantry TRAVIS BROW 009 Shelter 006 Park Bridge 241215'&8/5%#42#4- NEW BRIDGE LANE 008 &+52.#;5106190%'064' 005 #2241#%*4176'5 57$,'%6 KING STREET EAST 33 GREAT PORTWOOD STREET 007 61(70&+0) Car Park Works 35 241215'&56#6+%%#42#4- HOLLYWOOD WAY 004 5+)05614'2.#%'1.&#0& 12 8/5%#42#4-5+)05 1a 18 3 9'..+0)6104&06**'#610.#0' &'$'0*#/5#139 7 241215'&.#4)'&+)+6#. 64#8+5$4195%#.' HEATON LANE 15 *1..;911&9#;5%#.' Subway 64#8+5$419#.+0-41#&5%#.' 5%#.' )4'#6')'4610564''65%#.'Bank )4'#62146.#0&564''6-0+)*65$4+&)'5%#.' 56/#4;59#;0'9$4+&)'.#0'5%#.'1 2146911&4170&#$1765%#.' PH HESKETH STREET &+52.#;510*+)*9#; MANCHESTER ROAD 42 CLIFTON ROAD DERBY ROAD 12 9 70 26 5 73 19 PEARSON STREET 56 to 64 to 56 Gresham Walk 9 1 Allot Gdns 36 PARSONAGE ROAD 1 65 to 73 to 65 Belmont Nursery School 36 5 81 75 1 53 6 4 12 ESS BARDSLEY STREET 1 40 SANDY LANE 80 171 40 2 WALMSLEY STREET2 1 to 16 BURY STREET 40 72 85 68 10 Childrens Centre Sycamore 5 14 40 34 HAMILTON ROAD 32 81 48 Court SANDY LANE 7 1 M 60 The Ashleys 83 BURTON STREET HEATON ROAD SUTTON ROAD 135 31 STANLEY ROAD 9 TIVIOT WAY 1 Garage Shelter 65 164 48 63 1 38 70 20 ELLEN STREET 10 34 TIVIOT WAY 18 12 ALBION CLOSE 19 108 60 VMS Tame 67 163 Allotment 28 to 32 to 28 MARTEL COURT 17 3 WELLINGTON ROAD NORTH 93 WHITEFIELD Gardens River 26 Mast 8 63 86 Recreation Ground (Telecommunication) 32 &'016'5.1%#6+10(14 NAPIER ROAD 35 58 7 13 40 58 38 Shelter
    [Show full text]
  • Stockport GMTS2040 Implementation Plan 15.10.20 1. Introduction This
    Stockport GMTS2040 Implementation Plan 15.10.20 1. Introduction This Implementation Plan sets out how we will work towards our priorities including economic growth, improving the environment, and social inclusion by building on Stockport’s planned and current transport projects, many of which are set out in the Greater Manchester Transport Strategy (GMTS) 2040 5-Year Delivery Plan (2020- 2025). While the 5-year Delivery Plan tends to consider large, medium and long-term transport schemes, this Implementation Plan is mainly focussed on local, neighbourhood level priorities and interventions to 2025. A summary of strategic schemes within the 5 Year Delivery Plan are included in Map 1. Stockport Council has been developing strategic transport interventions between Stockport borough and northern parts of Cheshire East (including Manchester Airport) since the South East Manchester Multi-Modal Strategy (SEMMMS) was developed in 2001. Now in its second iteration, the draft SEMMMS Refresh (2019) is continuing to develop transport interventions and improvements to support the growth plans and objectives of the adopted Cheshire East Local Plan and the emerging Greater Manchester Spatial Framework. The preparation of the strategy has involved engagement with TfGM and neighbouring authorities in Greater Manchester, as well as Derbyshire County Council, the High Peak Borough Council and the Peak District National Park Authority. The draft SEMMMS Refresh sets out a clear vision to deliver a transport network that supports inclusive sustainable growth, improves quality of life and protects the environment. Three primary objectives are identified which include: - Support sustainable economic growth and promote urban regeneration - Improve quality of life, safety, health and quality of opportunity - Contribute to protecting the built and natural environments.
    [Show full text]