DOCSLIB.ORG

Tajikistan: Corruption Is a Key to Everything"

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

"Tajikistan: Corruption is a key to everything" “Corruption accompanies a Tajik citizen from birth to the grave. Periodicals in Tajikistan are full of articles exposing corruption in hospitals, schools, universities, banks, courts, customs, tax authorities, etc.”, said Nurali Dawlat, journalist-analyst (Dushanbe, Tajikistan), in an article written for cabar.asia. Follow us on LinkedIn! Once in a company of friends, one government official asked me why I did not work in government agencies? I answered honestly that I could not take bribes. He smiled and said: “We could not either… in the beginning, but then we were taught…” Many representatives of the middle and older generation remember the Soviet era, when government officials lived almost like all the other residents. In contrast to today’s “servants of the people”, Tajik Soviet officials often did not take bribes. And not just because they firmly believed in the holy ideals of communism. The reason was extremely simple. They knew that if somebody sent a complaint against them to Moscow, they would definitely be punished. There were enough examples of that in our history. Many still remember the case of the so-called “cotton records” in 1961, when the first secretary of the Communist Party of Tajikistan Tursun Uldzhabaev was fired from his post. Knowledgeable people say that there were not any violations. Moscow simply made such “cleansings” from time to time to remind the red bosses in Muslim republics who was the principal boss. The most high-profile corruption criminal proceeding in the Tajik SSR was instigated in the second half of the 1970s against 15 teachers of today’s Pedagogical University named after Aini. All of them got various terms, and the rector of the university Kandil Juraev, a well known Tajik scientist, was dismissed. However, I should note that many teachers did not take bribes at that time. They thought it scorn to do it. Problems in the legislation We cannot say that the government is not fighting this phenomenon, but the situation is getting worse every year. "Tajikistan: Corruption is a key to everything" A well-known economist in Tajikistan, professor Hojimahmad Umarov, believes that the level of corruption has reached such proportions that it is now becoming a “threat to national security”. [1] Tajikistan has ratified all international legal instruments relating to the eradication of corruption. In 2005, it adopted a new Law on the fight against corruption, the Strategy for Combating Corruption, in 2007, there was established a separate department within the structure of presidential power – the Agency for State Financial Control and Combating Corruption of the Republic of Tajikistan. [2] In addition, a variety of structures are currently fighting against corruption in Tajikistan, including the bodies of the Prosecutor’s Office, the Interior Ministry, the Tax Committee, customs, military authorities and others. However, corruption is so much present in all spheres of the country, that all of these measures are not enough. Apparently, the process of improvement of national legislation will continue. In any case, the partners of the Tajik government are hoping for that. In recent years, the problem of improvement of the legislation was repeatedly discussed with representatives of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). At the end of November 2014, international experts of anti-corruption unit of this organization said that Tajikistan fully implemented only four of the 17 recommendations, partially – 12, and one was not implemented at all. This organization recommended that the Tajik government should conduct a thorough and comparative analysis of the Criminal Code, the Law “On Combating Corruption”, Code of Administrative Offences and other relevant legislation of the Republic of Tajikistan and harmonize criminal and administrative anti-corruption laws of the country according to its results. [3] But the official Dushanbe believes that the OECD guidelines require a fundamental change in the legislation of Tajikistan, since these requirements are not consistent with our legal system. According to the former head of the Anti-Corruption Agency Fattokh Saidov (after changing the name and surname – Abdufattoh Goib.- author’s note), the recommendations to criminalize all forms of bribery, i.e promises to pay a bribe and promise to accept it, or to bring legal persons to criminal responsibility, on the whole does not meet the basics of "Tajikistan: Corruption is a key to everything" criminal law and the Constitution of Tajikistan. At the same time, he believes that some of the recommendations of the OECD are controversial, i.e their implementation takes place both in practice and in the legislation of our country. [4] A few years ago, Abdufattoh Goib admitted that “the so-called small” errors do not lead to “criminal liability”, otherwise we would not find room for all criminals in prisons of the republic” [5]. Konstantin Bondarenko, an expert on economic issues, believes that the problem lies in the fact that, having inherited the Soviet system of law, Tajikistan was trying to adapt it to modern conditions. But as a result of this synthesis, the republic has not developed a legal culture, which is called “the rule of law” in the developed countries. Reasons for systemic corruption The fact that corruption in Tajikistan has become a system was first recognized 10 years ago in a special research made by the employees of the Centre for Strategic Studies (CSS) under the President of Tajikistan. Subsequently, the CSS conducted two other studies that have shown that corruption in Tajikistan is gaining momentum. Experts believe that the main reason is that there is no public control and accountability of officials in the country because of the weakness of civil society. Lawyer Shokirjon Khakimov, deputy chairman of the Social Democratic Party, claims that Tajikistan has ratified an international convention to combat corruption, implemented its main provisions in the legislation, but because of the lack of parliamentary and public control, wrong personnel policies and weakness of democratic institutions, Tajikistan failed to reduce corruption relations in the country. According to him, contrary to the requirements of the Convention, citizens have no way of knowing about the income and property of public servants. Strong local authorities, weak accountability even to the closest management team and low salaries of the bureaucracy contribute to the widespread corruption. Khakimov believes that officials are given too much freedom, and too many people are dependent on their work. Normative legal acts regulating the activities of state bodies on the issue of certificates, licenses and various registration procedures create favorable "Tajikistan: Corruption is a key to everything" conditions for corruption relations, he said. Corruption is traditionally strong in a poor country, where the government has extensive powers, said Bondarenko. “If an official has the right to solve a large range of issues, a lot of officials are needed to solve them. At the same time, the low level of their official earnings naturally transform into the need to use corruption to improve their living standards”, said Bondarenko. Another Tajik expert Ali Mastov is convinced that the main reason for the spread of corruption in Tajikistan is the lack of political competition, free elections at all levels, independent courts and media, as well as the lack of fiscal transparency and the state apparatus swollen to epic proportions. “All of the above gives rise to a sense of impunity, and impunity, in turn, generates all- permissiveness that unfortunately, has become a normal thing in our lives”, says Ali Mastov. Corruption is everywhere Corruption accompanies Tajik citizen from birth to the grave. It is very easy to verify this. Periodicals in Tajikistan are full of articles exposing corruption in hospitals, schools, universities, banks, courts, customs, tax authorities, etc. This is probably one of the few topics when journalists are not accused that they execute someone’s order from abroad. During the past report press conference for journalists on July 27 of this year, Deputy Naimӣ Alamhon Kodiriyon said that 1,041 of corruption offenses were detected during six months. According to the tradition established in the last decade, the Tajik media annually rank the most corrupt ministries and agencies on the results of the work of the Anti-corruption agency. In the first half of 2015, the most corrupt organizations were the banking system (100 facts of corruption), the Ministry of Education and Science (53), the Ministry of health and social protection (45), the Ministry of the Interior (37), the Ministry of Justice (26), and the Ministry of agriculture (26). It should be noted that the Ministries of Education and Science and Health and Social Protection are leaders in this ranking over the last few years. In all other public institutions, there were also identified violations. "Tajikistan: Corruption is a key to everything" On July 23, the Chairman of the Customs Committee Abdufattokh Goib said that some entrepreneurs reduce twice the cost of imported goods through forgery. He says that, according to the statistics from China Customs, during six months, there were imported goods for $ 257 million to Tajikistan it, but according to Tajik data, this sum is 132 million dollars total. On July 24, the news agency “Ozodagon” reported that it was not clear what happened to the 500,000 of grant funds in the Committee for Women’s Affairs, which were allocated by the government for women-entrepreneurs. Employees of the Agency for Fight against corruption and the Audit Chamber are now involved in the investigation of this case. The scandal, which happened in May this year in the Committee of Youth, Tourism and Sports, included this agency in the “black list” of the Global Fund to Fight HIV / AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. Representatives of this international organization reported the missing $116,726 of $300,000 dollar grant allocated to the Committee on Youth through the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP).
Recommended publications
  • Violent Extremism and Insurgency in Tajikistan: a Risk Assessment

    Violent Extremism and Insurgency in Tajikistan: a Risk Assessment

    VIOLENT EXTREMISM AND INSURGENCY IN TAJIKISTAN: A RISK ASSESSMENT AUGUST 14, 2013 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Dr. Eric McGlinchey for Management Systems International for USAID’s Office of Technical Support in the Bureau for the Middle East (USAID/ME/TS). VIOLENT EXTREMISM AND INSURGENCY IN TAJIKISTAN: A RISK ASSESSMENT DRAFT Contracted under AID-OAA-TO-11-00051 Democracy and Governance and Peace and Security in Asia and the Middle East Dr. Eric McGlinchey is Associate Professor of Politics and Government in the Department of Public and International Affairs at George Mason University. He is an expert in Central Asian regime change, comparative politics, and political Islam. He is the author of Chaos, Violence, Dynasty: Politics and Islam in Central Asia. DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acronyms .................................................................................................................................... i Map ............................................................................................................................................ ii Executive Summary.................................................................................................................. iii I. Background: The Interplay of Religion and Politics in Tajikistan .....................................1
  • September 2000 Public Disclosure Authorized

    September 2000 Public Disclosure Authorized

    20925 September 2000 Public Disclosure Authorized ANTICORRUPTION IN Public Disclosure Authorized RANSITION A Contribution to the Policy Debate Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized A W 0 R L D F R EE 0 F P 0 V E R T Y I Anticorruption in Transition A Contribution to the Policy Debate The World Bank Washington, D.C. Copyright © 2000 THE WORLDBANK 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20433, USA All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America First printing September 2000 1 2 3 4 03 02 01 00 The opinions expressed in this report do not necessarily represent the views of the World Bank or its member governments. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any consequence of their use. The material in this publication is copyrighted. Requests for permission to reproduce portions of it should be sent to the Office of the Publisher at the address shown in the copyright notice above. The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally give permission promptly and, when the reproduction is for noncommercial purposes, without asking a fee. Permission to copy portions for classroom use is granted through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., Suite 910, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, Massachusetts 01923, USA. ISBN 0-8213-4802-7 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data hasbeen appliedfor. TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword........................................................................ vii Acknowledgments ........................................................................ ix Abbreviations ........................................................................ xi Executive Summary ........................................................................ xiii Chapter 1 The Level and Pattern of Corruption in the Transition Countries...............................
  • UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations

    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Logic of Kleptocracy: Corruption, Repression, and Political Opposition in Post-Soviet Eurasia Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/92g1h187 Author LaPorte, Jody Marie Publication Date 2012 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Logic of Kleptocracy: Corruption, Repression, and Political Opposition in Post-Soviet Eurasia By Jody Marie LaPorte A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Jason Wittenberg, Co-chair Professor Michael S. Fish, Co-chair Professor David Collier Professor Victoria Bonnell Spring 2012 The Logic of Kleptocracy: Corruption, Repression, and Political Opposition in Post-Soviet Eurasia Copyright 2012 by Jody Marie LaPorte Abstract The Logic of Kleptocracy: Corruption, Repression, and Political Opposition in Post-Soviet Eurasia by Jody Marie LaPorte Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Berkeley Professor Jason Wittenberg, co-chair Professor Michael S. Fish, co-chair This dissertation asks why some non-democratic regimes give political opponents significant leeway to organize, while others enforce strict limits on such activities. I examine this question with reference to two in-depth case studies from post-Soviet Eurasia: Georgia under President Eduard Shevardnadze and Kazakhstan under President Nursultan Nazarbayev. While a non- democratic regime was in place in both countries, opposition was highly tolerated in Georgia, but not allowed in Kazakhstan. I argue that these divergent policies can be traced to variation in the predominant source and pattern of state corruption in each country.
  • Tajikistan by Raissa Muhutdinova

    Tajikistan by Raissa Muhutdinova

    Tajikistan by Raissa Muhutdinova Capital: Dushanbe Population: 6.6 million GNI/capita: US$1,560 The social data above was taken from the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development’s Transition Report 2007: People in Transition, and the economic data from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators 2008. Nations in Transit Ratings and Averaged Scores 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Electoral Process 5.50 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.75 6.00 6.25 6.50 6.50 Civil Society 5.25 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 4.75 5.00 5.00 5.50 Independent Media 5.75 5.50 5.75 5.75 5.75 6.00 6.25 6.25 6.00 Governance* 6.25 6.00 6.00 6.00 5.75 n/a n/a n/a n/a National Democratic 6.25 Governance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 6.00 6.25 6.25 Local Democratic 6.00 Governance n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a 5.75 5.75 5.75 Judicial Framework 6.00 and Independence 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 5.75 Corruption 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25 6.25 Democracy Score 5.75 5.58 5.63 5.63 5.71 5.79 5.93 5.96 6.07 * With the 2005 edition, Freedom House introduced separate analysis and ratings for national democratic governance and local democratic governance to provide readers with more detailed and nuanced analysis of these two important subjects.
  • The Rise of Kleptocracy: Laundering Cash, Whitewashing Reputations

    The Rise of Kleptocracy: Laundering Cash, Whitewashing Reputations

    The Rise of Kleptocracy: Laundering Cash, Whitewashing Reputations Alexander Cooley, John Heathershaw, J.C. Sharman Journal of Democracy, Volume 29, Number 1, January 2018, pp. 39-53 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0003 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/683634 Access provided at 13 Jun 2019 01:42 GMT from Griffith University The Rise of Kleptocracy LAUNDERING CASH, WHITEWASHING REPUTATIONS Alexander Cooley, John Heathershaw, and J.C. Sharman Alexander Cooley is director of the Harriman Institute at Columbia University and Claire Tow Professor of Political Science at Barnard College. John Heathershaw is associate professor of international re- lations at the University of Exeter. J.C. Sharman is Sir Patrick Sheehy Professor of International Relations at the University of Cambridge. Kleptocracy and grand corruption are now under scrutiny as never be- fore. With renewed global attention on these abuses, a relatively clear picture has emerged of the domestic political economies shaped by klep- tocratic rule. Analysts have shown how state institutions are set up to allow elites and their families to systematically loot, while protecting these elites politically. In particular, this research has placed under the microscope the resource-rich countries that are vulnerable to kleptocrat- ic state capture. Yet to understand the operations of today’s jet-setting kleptocrats, one must look beyond the borders of the polities they despoil. Copi- ous news items feature kleptocrats and their families purchasing luxu- rious penthouses and cars; attending international cultural galas and charitable initiatives; and enlisting Western agents, lawyers, spokes- people, and pillars of the establishment to whitewash their reputations.
  • Tajikistan's Legal and Regulatory Framework

    Tajikistan's Legal and Regulatory Framework

    Report No: ACS10383 Republic of Tajikistan Tajikistan: Higher Education Sector Study Public Disclosure Authorized October 2014 GEDDR EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Standard Disclaimer: This volume is a product of the staff of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Copyright Statement: The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone 978-750-8400, fax 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright.com/. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, The World Bank, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax 202-522-2422, e-mail [email protected].
  • The Judicial System in Tajikistan

    The Judicial System in Tajikistan

    VILNIAUS UNIVERSITETAS ORIENTALISTIKOS CENTRAS The judicial system of Tajikistan and the situation of the opposition movement “Group 24”: an assessment Oct. 14th, 2015 Fabio Belafatti* Abstract This document provides an overview of the main features of the judicial system of the Republic of Tajikistan, with particular reference to its independence - or lack thereof – from the executive power and the issue of political usage of justice in the country. It then proceeds with an assessment of the situation of the opposition movement “Group 24” 1 , a recently established opposition group, allegedly targeted with political persecution. It concludes (in light of international experts and organizations views about the political, judiciary and human rights situation of the country) that the risk of human rights abuse against members of opposition groups is extremely high. * Vilnius University, Centre of Oriental Studies (Coordinator of the Centre of Contemporary Central Asian Studies). For communication: email: [email protected] or mail at: Vilniaus universiteto Orientalistikos centras | Universiteto g. 5, LT-01513 Vilnius 1 Also known as “Group of 24” 1 VILNIAUS UNIVERSITETAS ORIENTALISTIKOS CENTRAS The judicial system in Tajikistan Political framework In the opinion of many prominent analysts of Central Asian politics, since achieving independence in 1991 Tajikistan’s political system has been characterized by a high degree of region-based factionalism (which escalated into a ferocious civil war between 992 and 1997) coupled with strong authoritarian tendencies from the president of the country, Emomalii Rahmon (Эмомалӣ Раҳмон),2 leader of the faction that emerged victorious from the civil war. 3 The political dynamics of Tajikistan have at times been described as approaching the conditions of a failed state, 4 with a tendency to significant degrees of “warlordism” and military confrontation between the current leadership and the forces of the opposition, 5 defeated during the 1992-1997 war.
  • Mapping Exercise of Corruption and Governance Measurement Tools in Asia and Caucasus Countries

    Mapping Exercise of Corruption and Governance Measurement Tools in Asia and Caucasus Countries

    Corruption and Governance Measurement Tools in Asia and Caucasus countries – February, 2005 Mapping exercise of Corruption and Governance Measurement Tools In Asia and Caucasus countries Policy and Research Department1 Transparency International Secretariat Table of contents: Part I: Background and methodology p.1 Part II: Mapping the tools (listed by type) p.2 A. Single Country Tools A.1 Opinion Surveys on Perceptions and Experiences of Corruption p.2 A.2 Public Sector Diagnostics p.19 A.3 Sectoral Surveys p.23 A.4 Press Monitoring p.26 B. Multi Country Tools p.28 B.1 Opinion Surveys p.28 B.2 Public Sector Diagnostic p.31 B.3 Private Sector Environment Surveys p.32 B.4 Democracy and Governance Cross Country Indicators p.36 Summary p.40 Appendix (attached): Matrix of the tools (listed per country) Part I: Background and methodology The purpose of the study Following on from the report on Local Corruption Diagnostics and Measurement Tools in Africa, carried out by Transparency International for the U4 in February 2004, DFID has requested that TI identify and present the international, national and local tools that measure corruption and related phenomenon in Asia and the Caucasus. DFID has expressed interest in the following key focus countries for this exercise: Armenia, Bangladesh, Cambodia, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, India, Indonesia, Malaysia, Moldova, Nepal, China, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Tajikistan, Thailand and Vietnam. For Pakistan and India, special attention will be given to the tools assessing the provinces of Punjab, Orissa and West Bengal. Methodology of the study (including coverage and contents)2 The mapping covers a range of tools in 16 countries from the Asia and Caucasus region.
  • DFID's Anti-Corruption Strategy for Central Asia

    DFID's Anti-Corruption Strategy for Central Asia

    DFID’s Anti-Corruption Strategy for Central Asia January 2013 Introduction 1. Corruption can broadly be defined as the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. The word can cover a whole range of abuses. On one level it can refer to the risk of taxpayers’ money in DFID programmes being fraudulently spent or stolen. On another level it can refer to corruption within a country and its institutions, with the negative impact that this has on development prospects. DFID sets the highest standards for the manner in which its own money is spent. Through its development programmes, DFID also works to reduce the prevalence of corruption in each of its partner countries. 2. In November 2011, the Independent Commission on Aid Impact (ICAI) reviewed DFID’s approach to tackling corruption. It found that DFID had a good awareness of the fraud risks and seeks to safeguard UK funds through appropriate choices of funding channels and programme design, and often played a leading role within the donor community on anti- corruption work. It did however recommend that in any country assessed as having a high risk of corruption, DFID should develop an explicit anti-corruption strategy. As part of its response, DFID is producing anti-corruption strategies for each of its main partner countries. This strategy sets out how DFID will (a) safeguard UK taxpayers' money and (b) support efforts in Central Asia to reduce corruption and its impact on development over the next three years. 3. The UK Government is committed to transparency, results and value for money. To make it easier for taxpayers and citizens in its partner countries to ‘follow the money’, DFID now publishes details of all its new programmes and of all transactions over £500 on the DFID website (http://www.dfid.gov.uk).
  • FROZEN CONFLICTS' the Challenges of Reconciliation Table of Contents Features

    FROZEN CONFLICTS' the Challenges of Reconciliation Table of Contents Features

    per ConcordiamJournal of European Security and Defense Issues EMERGENCY RESPONSE POST-SOVIET SPACE Civil-military links a must Old approach won’t help define borders BALANCING THE BALKANS PLUS Pillars of progress eroding New Afghan momentum Croatia hosts special forces UNRESOLVED CONFLICTS Further from resolution than ever? Olympic security effort RESOLVING 'FROZEN CONFLICTS' The Challenges of Reconciliation Table of Contents features ON THE COVER Protracted, or “frozen,” conflicts present a challenge to stability and security. Moving Answering away from the status quo while protecting 18 against the potential of renewed violence the distress call is not a simple endeavor. Finding common Civil-military cooperation is a ground upon which all parties can agree has must in emergency response to proven a nearly impossible task. man-made and natural disasters. 26 A balanced view of the Balkans Some believe the Balkan conflict p. is over, but others warn it is on 10 the brink of erupting again. The myth of 'frozen conflicts' 32 Resolving post-Soviet Regional and international support for stabilization could lead to lasting solutions 'frozen conflicts' Cover illustration: per Concordiam staff in places such as the South Caucasus. A strong foundation must be in place for effective regional integration. 38 Russia and the post-Soviet space Taking other interests into account will help Moscow regain a leadership role. 2 perConcordiam p.52 departments 4 Director's Letter 5 Contributors 6 In This Issue 7 Letters to the Editor 8 Viewpoint 64 Book Review 66 Calendar COOPERATION SECURITY POLICY 44 On Corruption's 52 Olympic effort 60 Kazakhstan faces Front Lines Nations collaborate to secure OSCE hurdles Reforms help Tajikistan international sporting events.
  • By Nargis Zokirova Corruption in Tajikistan Has Gone Beyond The

    By Nargis Zokirova Corruption in Tajikistan Has Gone Beyond The

    By Nargis Zokirova Corruption in Tajikistan has gone beyond the social level, reaching the political and economic strata. The whole system of executive power is penetrated by corruption, inhibiting the developing economy of Tajikistan. Bribing is a normal habit in every sector of the governmental departments of Tajikistan. Tajiks are used to giving bribes for everything: to get jobs, enroll in universities and pass exams, to get driver’s licenses, to pay taxes, to get passports and so on. That is why Tajikistan was ranked by Transparency International as one of the most corrupt countries in the world. According to Khodjimuhammad Umarov, an independent economist, the majority of the Tajik population takes part in corrupt practices. The 2005 report “Corruption in Tajikistan: Public Opinion” was provided by the Tajik president’s Strategic Research Center, the Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation and the United Nations Development Program. According to this report, ordinary people bribe officials up to three times a year. Businessmen and entrepreneurs are more prone to giving bribes than any other part of the population. For them, giving bribes is a daily reality. Likewise, anybody who wants to start a business becomes a victim of the corrupt system. The officials must also pay for services or render services in order to see their problems solved. It was said that 34 percent of officials confirmed having paid bribes or rendering services to “necessary people” over the last three years. Abdulvokhid Shamolov, the head of a task group, claimed that “corruption in Tajikistan leads to political discredit of the state authority.” Legal institutions, judicial authority, health and education authorities, tax and custom services, trade and transport are all polluted by internal corruption.
  • Nations in Transit 2020

    Nations in Transit 2020

    EMBARGOED until May 6, 2020 12:01 a.m. Eastern NATIONS IN TRANSIT 2020 Dropping the Democratic Facade EMBARGOED until May 6, 2020 NATIONS IN 12:01 a.m. Eastern TRANSIT 2020 CONTENTS Nations in Transit 2020: Dropping the Democratic Facade ..................... 1 Justice in the Service of Politics ..................................................... 6 Legislatures on the Sidelines ......................................................... 8 Fragile Institutions Open the Door for Chinese Communist Party Influence ........................................... 10 Nations in Transit 2020 Map ............................................................... 12 Eurasia’s Autocrats Grapple with Succession Plans ............................ 14 Within Eco-Protests, Support for Democracy .................................. 16 Recommendations ............................................................................. 18 Nations in Transit 2020 Scores ............................................................ 20 Nations in Transit 2020: Overview of Score Changes ............................. 22 Methodology .................................................................................... 23 Nations in Transit 2020: Category and Democracy Score Summary ......... 24 Nations in Transit 2020: Democracy Score History by Region ................. 25 RESEARCH AND EDITORIAL TEAM This booklet was made possible through the generous support of the U.S. Agency for International Development. The positions of this ON THE COVER publication do not represent the positions