DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Australia Must Join the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Australia Must Join the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons CHOOSING HUMANITY Why Australia must join the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons This report was produced by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, Australia, on Aboriginal land. We acknowledge that sovereignty has never been ceded and pay our respects to Indigenous elders past, present and emerging. Indigenous Australians continue to disproportionately suffer the intergenerational health impacts of nuclear testing, with vast tracts of land still contaminated. The legacy of nuclear weapons testing in our region is a constant reminder of the critical need to eliminate these weapons of mass destruction. Contributing authors: Chapter 1 – Stuart Maslen Chapter 2 – Richard Tanter and Sue Wareham Chapter 3 – Tilman Ruff Chapter 4 – Vanessa Griffen, Dimity Hawkins and Talei Luscia Mangioni Chapter 5 – Daryl Le Cornu Chapter 6 – Gem Romuld Editing: Gem Romuld Design: Tessa Sellar This report was produced with financial and editorial support from the Australian Conservation Foundation. Other generous supporters include Quakers Australia (Peace and Social Justice Fund), the Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation, the Women’s International League for Peace and Freedom, Australia, and many ICAN supporters. Thank you. July 2019. CONTENTS Foreword 4 Introduction 6 Chapter 1: The Treaty 8 Chapter 2: Getting on the right side of history 18 Chapter 3: The danger and the consequences 29 Chapter 4: Black mist, white rain 37 Chapter 5: Australia’s approach to banning the bomb 45 Chapter 6: Momentum for change 56 Conclusion 64 References 66 Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons 70 FOREWORD Moment of adoption of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons, United Nations, New York, 7 July 2017. Credit: Clare Conboy 4 The danger of nuclear war is of states, including those that through hosting key intelligence growing. The more we learn about have not joined them. For example and communications facilities at the catastrophic consequences the US does not manufacture or Pine Gap and elsewhere. These of any use of nuclear weapons, export landmines and is in virtual facilities assist the command, the worse it looks. Nine nations compliance with the landmine ban control and targeting of US possess some fourteen thousand treaty, despite opposing it. nuclear weapons. nuclear weapons.1 Eighteen Former UN High Representative We cannot have it both ways. hundred of them stand poised for Disarmament Affairs, Angela We cannot claim to be working and ready to launch within Kane, said in 2014: for a world free of weapons of minutes. As long as they exist, mass destruction while also nuclear weapons pose the most How many States today boast that claiming that we need US nuclear acute existential threat that human they are ‘biological weapon states’ weapons. This makes us part of beings have created for ourselves or ‘chemical weapon States’? the problem of the most acute and for all species with whom we Who is arguing now that bubonic existential threat humanity share planet Earth. plague or polio are legitimate faces. We should be part of the to use as weapons under any Humanity has made substantial solution instead. The danger circumstance, whether in an attack progress towards eliminating posed by nuclear weapons is a or in retaliation? Who speaks of a other indiscriminate and fundamental issue of humanity, bio-weapon umbrella? 2 inhumane weapons – chemical the right to life, international and biological weapons, It is inconsistent and morally law, intergenerational justice landmines and cluster munitions. bankrupt to deny the use of and sustainability. It should be Evidence of the indiscriminate biological or chemical weapons above party politics. Australia and unacceptable consequences while maintaining a right to should ratify the UN Treaty on the of these weapons provided the threaten millions of civilians with Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons necessary motivation to outlaw radioactive incineration and famine. and implement it in good faith. them. Prohibition treaties have Commendably, Australia under Other nations have demonstrated then established a new standard both Coalition and Labor that supporting the Treaty is and basis for progressively governments has joined all compatible with a military alliance eliminating the relevant weapons. treaties banning unacceptable with the US. More than half the Despite setbacks and slow weapons. It is anomalous that in states that the US designates as its progress, the pathway of recent years Australia has claimed “major non-NATO allies” voted to “stigmatise, prohibit, eliminate” to support nuclear disarmament adopt the Treaty. New Zealand and has proven effective in each case. while opposing the UN Treaty Thailand have ratified the Treaty While universal adherence to on the Prohibition of Nuclear without causing any disruption to these treaties is the ultimate goal, Weapons. Indeed, Australia was military cooperation with the US. no weapons-related treaty has one of the first governments to This is because their cooperation gained universality. declare that it would not join does not involve the use of nuclear this Treaty. The reason for this weapons. Another US ally in our It may take a long time for some inconsistency is that since the region, the Philippines, has also states to join. China and France, early 1990s every Australian signed the Treaty. for example, joined the Non- government has asserted that US Proliferation Treaty in 1992, 24 Joining the Treaty on the nuclear weapons are essential to years after it opened for signature. Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons our national security and should Waiting for other states to do the is an effective way to build a be available for use on our behalf. right thing is no excuse for delay. safer future for all Australians. Moreover, Australia provides Treaties create norms which It will help advance the peace and material assistance for possible become influential over time. security our world so desperately use of US nuclear weapons Treaties influence the behaviour needs. This report explains why. Professor Gillian Triggs Former President of the Australian Human Rights Commission 5 INTRODUCTION Some claim that nuclear weapons would produce a massive group of people gathered in keep us safe, but the reverse firestorm, with an area tens Melbourne in 2005. This group is true. Along with the explicit of kilometres wide starved of of people founded ICAN, the threat of nuclear war, there have oxygen, killing any survivors of International Campaign to Abolish been many accidents or near the initial blast. Nuclear Weapons, which sought a misses due to human, technical global ban on the worst weapons Even a limited regional nuclear war and computer errors. Only luck of mass destruction. – perhaps between Pakistan and has prevented a nuclear launch India fighting yet again in Kashmir A decade later, in July 2017, since 1945. This luck cannot hold – would produce enough soot the United Nations adopted indefinitely. Extremists, hackers to trigger a decade-long nuclear the Treaty on the Prohibition of and unstable leaders further winter. Reduced crop yields would Nuclear Weapons (TPNW), and worsen the odds. result in global famine. Careful in December that year ICAN was The humanitarian impacts are too modelling of detonations of under awarded the Nobel Peace Prize great, and the risks too high. 0.5% of the global nuclear arsenal for our work to “draw attention finds up to two billion people at to the catastrophic humanitarian Past horrors are a pale shadow of risk of starvation. consequences of any use of what newer weapons, many times nuclear weapons” and for our more destructive than those used Dismayed by the lack of progress “ground-breaking efforts to on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, can on nuclear disarmament following achieve a treaty-based prohibition do. The Red Cross acknowledges the failure of nuclear-armed of such weapons”.3 that responding meaningfully to a states to disarm despite their nuclear detonation is impossible. obligations under the nuclear Globally, we are at a turning point. One large thermonuclear blast Non-Proliferation Treaty, a small The TPNW delegitimises and 6 stigmatises nuclear weapons, In the past Australia played and as much an existential providing fresh impetus and a an important role in efforts to threat as global warming. practical pathway to disarmament. achieve multilateral disarmament We are out of step with our Prohibition and stigmatisation treaties, most notably with neighbours in the Asia-Pacific, achieve results and change both chemical weapons. Australia and with the vast majority of discourse and behaviour. joined the treaties banning states globally. Australia signing landmines and cluster munitions This report outlines why it is would send a clear message to even when the US opposed them. crucial that Australia signs and all nuclear-armed states, and be ratifies the TPNW. The TPNW was carefully a major step in increasing global drafted to complement the Non- security. As former UN Secretary- The Australian community wants Proliferation Treaty. It provides General Ban Ki-moon said: our government to sign and ratify the next step forward in the global ”There are no right hands for the the Treaty. Seventy-nine per cent move for nuclear abolition. All wrong weapons”4 of the public are in favour, with signatories to the TPNW commit only 8 per cent opposed (Ipsos, We cannot have it both ways. to work for its universal adoption November 2018). Either Australia supports nuclear and for the time-bound, verifiable disarmament, or it supports the In this report, national health elimination of nuclear stockpiles. potential use of nuclear weapons. organisations, faith leaders, All this will need skilled and international legal experts, sustained diplomacy over time. We have been leaders in nuclear experts and parliamentarians from disarmament in the past – we can Signing and ratifying is in our all sides endorse Australia signing be leaders again. national security interest. These and ratifying the Treaty. weapons are manifestly unsafe Australia needs to join this treaty.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Submission to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission
    Roman Oszanski A Submission to the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission Preamble I have chosen not to follow the issues papers: their questions are more suited to those planning to expand the nuclear industry, and many of the issues raised are irrelevant if one believes that, based on the evidence, the industry should be left to die a natural death, rather than being supported to the exclusion of more promising technologies. Executive Summary The civil nuclear industry is in decline globally. [Ref charts on existing reactors, rising costs]. It is not an industry of the future, but of the past. If it were not for the intimate connection to the military industry, it would not exist today. There is no economic advantage to SA in expanding the existing industry in this state. Nuclear power does not offer a practical solution to climate change: total lifetime emissions are likely to be (at best) similar to those of gas power plants, and there is insufficient uranium to replace all the goal fired generators. A transition to breeder technologies leaves us with major problems of waste disposal and proliferation of weapons material. Indeed, the problems of weapons proliferation and the black market in fissionable materials mean that we should limit sales of Uranium to countries which are known proliferation risks, or are non- signatories to the NNPT: we should ban sales of Australian Uranium to Russia and India. There is a current oversupply of enrichment facilities, and there is considerable international concern at the possibility of using such facilities to enrich Uranium past reactor grade to weapons grade.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2017 / No.94 7,453 Cities
    October 2017 / No.94 Please also check our website and Mayors for Peace Member Cities Facebook page: Website: 7,453 cities http://www.mayorsforpeace.org/english/index.html in 162 countries and regions Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/mayorsforpeace (as of October 1, 2017) “Like” our Facebook page to help spread awareness of our mission. Table of Contents Support our petition calling for all states to join the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons as soon as possible Mayors for Peace Vice President’s Attendance to the Signing Ceremony of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons Events Commemorating“International Day of Peace” Letter of Congratulations to ICAN on Receiving the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize Postponement of the Forum on Solidarity and Peace in the Mediterranean in Tarragona, Spain Bestowal of Medal of Honor by the King of Norway upon Tore Nearland, founder of Bike for Peace Regional Chapter Activities Member City Activities “Peace News from Hiroshima” (Provided by the Hiroshima Peace Media Center) Mayors for Peace Information System Request for Payment of the 2017 Mayors for Peace Membership Fee Visitor(s) to the President of Mayors of Peace Last Month Mayors for Peace Member Cities - 7,453 Cities in 162 Countries/Regions --------------------------------------------------------- ■Support our petition calling for all states to join the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons as soon as possible --------------------------------------------------------- Since December 2010, Mayors for Peace has been promoting a global grassroots petition drive to call for negotiations of a nuclear weapons convention. Following the adoption of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in July this year, at the 9th General Conference in August, Mayors for Peace decided to promote a petition drive urging the nuclear-armed states and their allies to participate in the Treaty as soon as possible as part of our initiatives based on our new Action Plan (2017-2020).
    [Show full text]
  • HON. GIZ WATSON B. 1957
    PARLIAMENTARY HISTORY ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA TRANSCRIPT OF AN INTERVIEW WITH HON. GIZ WATSON b. 1957 - STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA - ORAL HISTORY COLLECTION DATE OF INTERVIEW: 2015-2016 INTERVIEWER: ANNE YARDLEY TRANSCRIBER: ANNE YARDLEY DURATION: 19 HOURS REFERENCE NUMBER: OH4275 COPYRIGHT: PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA & STATE LIBRARY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA. GIZ WATSON INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS NOTE TO READER Readers of this oral history memoir should bear in mind that it is a verbatim transcript of the spoken word and reflects the informal, conversational style that is inherent in such historical sources. The Parliament and the State Library are not responsible for the factual accuracy of the memoir, nor for the views expressed therein; these are for the reader to judge. Bold type face indicates a difference between transcript and recording, as a result of corrections made to the transcript only, usually at the request of the person interviewed. FULL CAPITALS in the text indicate a word or words emphasised by the person interviewed. Square brackets [ ] are used for insertions not in the original tape. ii GIZ WATSON INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPTS CONTENTS Contents Pages Introduction 1 Interview - 1 4 - 22 Parents, family life and childhood; migrating from England; school and university studies – Penrhos/ Murdoch University; religion – Quakerism, Buddhism; countryside holidays and early appreciation of Australian environment; Anti-Vietnam marches; civil-rights movements; Activism; civil disobedience; sport; studying environmental science; Albany; studying for a trade. Interview - 2 23 - 38 Environmental issues; Campaign to Save Native Forests; non-violent Direct Action; Quakerism; Alcoa; community support and debate; Cockburn Cement; State Agreement Acts; campaign results; legitimacy of activism; “eco- warriors”; Inaugural speech .
    [Show full text]
  • Dollars for Death Say No to Uranium Mining & Nuclear Power
    Dollars for Death Say No to Uranium Mining & Nuclear Power Jim Green & Others 2 Dollars for Death Contents Preface by Jim Green............................................................................3 Uranium Mining ...................................................................................5 Uranium Mining in Australia by Friends of the Earth, Australia..........................5 In Situ Leach Uranium Mining Far From ‘Benign’ by Gavin Mudd.....................8 How Low Can Australia’s Uranium Export Policy Go? by Jim Green................10 Uranium & Nuclear Weapons Proliferation by Jim Falk & Bill Williams..........13 Nuclear Power ...................................................................................16 Ten Reasons to Say ‘No’ to Nuclear Power in Australia by Friends of the Earth, Australia...................................................................16 How to Make Nuclear Power Safe in Seven Easy Steps! by Friends of the Earth, Australia...................................................................18 Japan: One Year After Fukushima, People Speak Out by Daniel P. Aldrich......20 Nuclear Power & Water Scarcity by Sue Wareham & Jim Green........................23 James Lovelock & the Big Bang by Jim Green......................................................25 Nuclear Waste ....................................................................................28 Nuclear Power: Watt a Waste .............................................................................28 Nuclear Racism .................................................................................31
    [Show full text]
  • Hiroshima-ICAN Academy on Nuclear Weapons and Global Security 2020
    Hiroshima-ICAN Academy on Nuclear Weapons and Global Security 2020 Hiroshima - ICAN Academy on Nuclear Weapons and Global Security 2020 --- Contents --- Program Framework Profiles of Guest Educators and Coordinators Contact Persons Program Framework Introduction: Hiroshima Prefecture and the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons ("ICAN"), the 2017 Nobel Peace Prize Laureate organization, will hold the Hiroshima-ICAN Academy on Nuclear Weapons and Global Security 2020. Through this training program, we aim to nurture global leaders to make concrete and peaceful contributions to the world. Due to the global spread of COVID-19, the Academy will be composed of two parts. Part 1 is the online learning course and webinars, and Part 2 the in-person training program to take place in Hiroshima City. The dates for Part 2 are to be confirmed after carefully examining the COVID-19 circumstances in Japan and overseas. Further information will be provided at the end of Part 1. Program Framework: The program of the Academy is designed around four themes. The first theme, “Humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons,” is a crucial component of the program, particularly given that the Academy is organized by Hiroshima Prefecture and Part 2 is physically held in Hiroshima. We believe all discussions on nuclear weapons and global security must begin here. The second theme is “Political, legal and technical aspects – nuclear weapons and global security.” Leading experts in the field will offer videos to watch and documents to read as learning materials that aim to shed light on various aspects of the theme. The third theme, “Civil society in action,” will take up a wide range of civil society efforts including education, awareness raising, and advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Assoc. Prof. Tilman Ruff Melbourne School of Population and Global Health University of Melbourne
    1 Feb 2021 Expert witness statement: Radiation health impacts of proposed Fingerboards Mineral Sands Mine Project, Glenaladale, Victoria Summary of Conclusions and Recommendations on Radiation and Health 1. New evidence shows that radiation risks to health are greater than previously thought and are not adequately reflected in regulatory limits. Health risk exists below the maximum permissible doses for the public and for workers. Radiation health risks associated with chronic diseases approximately double the risks associated with cancer. 2. Radiation health risks are 4 - 5 times greater for children than adults and 40% greater for women and girls than for men and boys at all ages. Young adults are more susceptible than older adults. 3. I found no mention in any project documentation I reviewed regarding monitoring or radiation protection measures for sites particularly relevant to children, such as schools, kindergartens, child care centres, playgrounds or sports facilities. 4. All aspects of project management should aim for radiation exposures for workers and the public which are as low as practicable and well below regulatory limits, and set action levels that would trigger prompt evaluation and response, with involvement of DHHS. I would recommend that the latter levels (including all exposure pathways) be set at around 1-2 mSv per year for workers and 0.1 - 0.2 mSv/yr for the public. 5. Radiation protection measures should be informed by age and gender differences in radiation health risks, and should address settings particularly relevant for children. 6. A major project which will run over more than two decades must consider the implications of global heating and factor them into its mine management.
    [Show full text]
  • Mann, Monique& Rimmer, Matthew (2016) Submission to the Senate Economics References Committee on the 2016 Census
    This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Mann, Monique& Rimmer, Matthew (2016) Submission to the Senate Economics References Committee on the 2016 Census. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/99687/ c Copyright 2016 Monique Mann and Matthew Rimmer This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. September 2016 SUBMISSION TO THE SENATE ECONOMICS REFERENCES COMMITTEE ON THE 2016 CENSUS DR MONIQUE MANN LECTURER SCHOOL OF JUSTICE FACULTY OF LAW QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY DR MATTHEW RIMMER PROFESSOR OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018 CARNEGIE COUNCIL ANNUAL REPORT 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Mission 2 President’s Message 3 Activities Summary 4 Program Highlights 5 Special Initiatives by Senior Fellows 16 Additional Special Events and Activities 18 Ethics & International Affairs Quarterly Journal 22 Calendar of Events and Podcasts 25 Financial Summary 35 Thank You to our Supporters 36 Supporters 37 Officers, Trustees, and Committees 38 Staff and Fellows 39 C2G2 Advisory Group 39 Ethics & International Affairs Editorial Board 40 Pacific Delegates 40 Carnegie New Leaders 40 MISSION Carnegie Council for Ethics in International Affairs works to foster a global conversation on major ethical challenges in international politics and in communities around the world. Broadcasting across multiple formats and media channels, Carnegie Council enriches this conversation with informative lectures, interviews, articles, and programs—all available worldwide to anyone, anywhere. We convene: The world’s leading thinkers in the discussion of global issues We communicate: Ethical perspectives to a worldwide audience We connect: Communities through the exploration of shared values CARNEGIE COUNCIL: MAKING ETHICS MATTER PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Dear Friends, We are living in a time of accelerating climate change, yet the United States’ response is to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement and roll back environmental regulations; a time of growing distrust of governments, global organizations, and the very concept of liberal democracy; a time of fake news and misinformation, while professional journalists are persecuted in many countries and labeled “the enemy of the people” here in the United States. This is a time of nuclear threat; a time of increasing inequality, populism, nationalism, and authoritarianism; a time when a record number of people—over 68 million in 2017—have been driven from their homes; a time when artificial intelligence is on the cusp of changing our world forever.
    [Show full text]
  • Take Heart and Name WA's New Federal Seat Vallentine 2015 Marks 30 Years Since Jo Vallentine Took up Her Senate Position
    Take heart and name WA’s new federal seat Vallentine 2015 marks 30 years since Jo Vallentine took up her senate position, the first person in the world to be elected on an anti-nuclear platform. What better way to acknowledge her contribution to peace, nonviolence and protecting the planet than to name a new federal seat after her? The official Australian parliament website describes Jo Vallentine in this way: Jo Vallentine was elected in 1984 to represent Western Australia in the Senate for the Nuclear Disarmament Party, running with the slogan ‘Take Heart—Vote Vallentine’. She commenced her term in July 1985 as an Independent Senator for Nuclear Disarmament, claiming in her first speech that she was the first member of any parliament in the world to be elected on this platform. When she stood for election again in 1990, she was elected as a senator for The Greens (Western Australia), and was the first Green in the Australian Senate. … During her seven years in Parliament, Vallentine was a persistent voice for peace, nuclear disarmament, Aboriginal land rights, social justice and the environment (emphasis added)i. Jo Vallentine’s parliamentary and subsequent career should be recognised in the named seat of Vallentine because: 1. Jo Vallentine was the first woman or person in several roles, in particular: The first person in the world to win a seat based on a platform of nuclear disarmament The first person to be elected to federal parliament as a Greens party politician. The Greens are now Australia’s third largest political party, yet no seat has been named after any of their political representatives 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chain-Reaction-#114-April-2012.Pdf
    Issue #114 | April 2012 RRP $5.50 The National Magazine of Friends of the Earth Australia www.foe.org.au ukushima fone year on • Occupy Texas Can we save the • Fighting Ferguson’s nuclear dump Murray-Darling? • A smart grid and seven energy sources • How low can uranium export policy go? 1 Chain Reaction #114 April 2012 Contents Edition #114 − April 2012 Regular items Publisher FoE Australia News 4 FoE Australia Contacts Friends of the Earth, Australia Chain Reaction ABN 81600610421 FoE Australia ABN 18110769501 FoE International News 8 inside back cover www.foe.org.au youtube.com/user/FriendsOfTheEarthAUS Features twitter.com/FoEAustralia facebook.com/pages/Friends-of-the-Earth- MURRAY-DARLING NUCLEAR POWER & FUKUSHIMA Australia/16744315982 AND RIVER RED GUMS Fighting Ferguson’s Dump 20 flickr.com/photos/foeaustralia Can we save the Natalie Wasley Chain Reaction website Murray-Darling Basin? 10 Global Conference for a www.foe.org.au/chain-reaction Jonathan La Nauze Nuclear Power Free World 22 Climate change and the Cat Beaton and Peter Watts Chain Reaction contact details Murray-Darling Plan 13 Fukushima − one year on: PO Box 222,Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065. Jamie Pittock photographs 24 email: [email protected] phone: (03) 9419 8700 River Red Gum vegetation Australia’s role in the survey project 14 Fukushima disaster 26 Chain Reaction team Aaron Eulenstein Jim Green Jim Green, Kim Stewart, Georgia Miller, Rebecca Pearse, Who is to blame for the Richard Smith, Elena McMaster, Tessa Sellar MIC CHECK: Fukushima nuclear disaster? 28 Layout
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Fukushima: Nuclear Power in East Asia
    LEARNING FROM FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR POWER IN EAST ASIA LEARNING FROM FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR POWER IN EAST ASIA EDITED BY PETER VAN NESS AND MEL GURTOV WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM ANDREW BLAKERS, MELY CABALLERO-ANTHONY, GLORIA KUANG-JUNG HSU, AMY KING, DOUG KOPLOW, ANDERS P. MØLLER, TIMOTHY A. MOUSSEAU, M. V. RAMANA, LAUREN RICHARDSON, KALMAN A. ROBERTSON, TILMAN A. RUFF, CHRISTINA STUART, TATSUJIRO SUZUKI, AND JULIUS CESAR I. TRAJANO Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Learning from Fukushima : nuclear power in East Asia / Peter Van Ness, Mel Gurtov, editors. ISBN: 9781760461393 (paperback) 9781760461409 (ebook) Subjects: Nuclear power plants--East Asia. Nuclear power plants--Risk assessment--East Asia. Nuclear power plants--Health aspects--East Asia. Nuclear power plants--East Asia--Evaluation. Other Creators/Contributors: Van Ness, Peter, editor. Gurtov, Melvin, editor. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover image: ‘Fukushima apple tree’ by Kristian Laemmle-Ruff. Near Fukushima City, 60 km from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, February 2014. The number in the artwork is the radioactivity level measured in the orchard—2.166 microsieverts per hour, around 20 times normal background radiation. This edition © 2017 ANU Press Contents Figures . vii Tables . ix Acronyms and abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Biographies
    BIOGRAPHIES OF SPEAKERS 1 Prof. Osamu Arakaki Professor, International Christian University Tokyo, Japan Osamu Arakaki is a professor at International Christian University (ICU), Japan, and an expert of international law and international relations. He received a PhD in Law from Victoria University of WellinGton, New Zealand, and an MA in Political Science from the University of Toronto, Canada. Before he beGan servinG at ICU, he was a junior expert of the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). He was also a visitinG fellow at Harvard Law School, USA, visitinG associate professor at the University of Tokyo, Japan, and professor at Hiroshima City University, Japan. His main works include “East Asia: ReGional RefuGee ReGimes” (co-author) in Costello and others (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International RefuGee Law (Oxford University Press, forthcominG), “International Law ConcerninG Infectious Diseases: International Sanitary Conventions in the 1940s” in HoGakushirin, 118:2, (2020), Statelessness Conventions and Japanese Laws: Convergence and Divergence (UNHCR Representation in Japan, 2015) and RefuGee Law and Practice in Japan (AshGate, 2008). Source: https://acsee.iafor.org/dvteam/osamu-arakaki/ 2 Laurie Ashton Of Counsel, Keller Rohrback Phoenix, Arizona Laurie Ashton is Of Counsel to Keller Rohrback. Prior to becominG Of Counsel, she was a partner in the Arizona affiliate of Keller Rohrback. Early in her career, as an adjunct professor, she tauGht semester courses in LawyerinG Theory and Practice and Advanced Business Reorganizations. She also served as a law clerk for the Honorable Charles G. Case, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, for the District of Arizona for two years. An important part of Laurie’s international work involves the domestic and international leGal implications of treaty obliGations and breaches.
    [Show full text]