STATE of COLORADO Ralph L
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Technical Memorandum
Analysis and Technical Update to the Colorado Water Plan Technical Memorandum Prepared for: Colorado Water Conservation Board Project Title: Current and 2050 Planning Scenario Water Supply and Gap Results Date: September 18, 2019 Prepared by: Wilson Water Group Reviewed by: Jacobs, Brown & Caldwell Technical Update Water Supply and Gap Results Table of Contents Section 1 : Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 10 Section 2 : Definitions and Terminology ........................................................................................................ 11 Section 3 : SWSI 2010 Water Supply Methodology....................................................................................... 12 Section 4 : Technical Update Water Supply Methodology ............................................................................ 15 4.1 Current/Baseline Water Supply Methodology .......................................................................... 15 4.1.1 CDSS Basin Water Supply Methodology ..................................................................................... 16 4.1.2 Non-CDSS Basin Water Supply Methodology ............................................................................. 19 4.2 Planning Scenario A-E Water Supply Methodology .................................................................. 21 4.2.1 Planning Scenario Water Supply Adjustments ........................................................................... -
Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, Colorado Volume II: a Natural Heritage Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Rio Grande and Conejos Counties
Biological Inventory of Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, Colorado Volume II: A Natural Heritage Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Rio Grande and Conejos Counties Colorado Natural Heritage Program College of Natural Resources, 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Biological Inventory of Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, Colorado Volume II: A Natural Heritage Inventory and Assessment of Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Rio Grande and Conejos Counties Prepared for: Colorado Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street Room 718 Denver, Colorado 80203 Prepared by: Joe Rocchio, Denise Culver, Steve Kettler, and Robert Schorr March 2000 Colorado Natural Heritage Program College of Natural Resources 254 General Services Building Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 ii USER’S GUIDE The Biological Inventory of Rio Grande and Conejos Counties, conducted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program, consists of two essentially distinct projects that are highly integrated with respect to methodology and fieldwork. This report reflects the separate nature of the projects by being organized in a two-volume set. Both projects utilized the same Natural Heritage methodology that is used throughout North America, and both searched for and assessed the plants, animals, and plant communities on the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s list of rare and imperiled elements of biodiversity. Each volume prioritizes potential conservation areas based on the relative significance of the biodiversity they support and the urgency for protection of the site. All information explaining Natural Heritage methodology and ranks is repeated in each volume, so that each volume can stand-alone and be used independently of the other. -
State of the States 2010: HOW the RECESSION MIGHT CHANGE
STATE OF THE STATES 2010 HOW THE RECESSION MIGHT CHANGE STATES FEBRUARY 2010 The Pew Center on the States is a division of The Pew Charitable Trusts that identifies and advances effective solutions to critical issues facing states. Pew is a nonprofit organization that applies a rigorous, analytical approach to improve public policy, inform the public and stimulate civic life. PEW CENTER ON THE STATES Susan K. Urahn, managing director ProJect Team: Editors Graphics and Design Diane Fancher Danny Dougherty Lori Grange Design and Publications Barbara Rosewicz Evan Potler Writers Carla Uriona Stephen C. Fehr Pamela M. Prah Christine Vestal ACKNOWLEDGMENTS In addition to those listed above, we would like to recognize and thank Pew colleagues who assisted in this publication. Planning and conception: Katherine Barrett, Doug Chapin, Richard Greene, Kil Huh, Michele Mariani Vaughn, Andrew McDonald and Albert Wat. Photo research: Daniel C. Vock. Reporting assistance: David Harrison. Editorial research: Sarah Emmans, Tiffany Ward and Katharine Zambon. Fact-checking: Nancy Augustine, Megan Cotten, Samuel Derheimer, Melissa Maynard, Matt McKillop, Morgan Shaw and Liz Snyder. Communications: Andrew McDonald and Sarah Holt. Dissemination: Julia Hoppock, Jennifer Peltak, Frederick Schecker and Cari Sutton. We thank the Pew Center on the States project teams for their contributions. We also thank Marcia Kramer of Kramer Editing Services for her editorial assistance. For additional information on Pew and the Center on the States, please visit www.pewcenteronthestates.org. This report is intended for educational and informational purposes. References to specific policy makers or companies have been included solely to advance these purposes and do not constitute an endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation by The Pew Charitable Trusts. -
2006, the Voters of Colorado Elected Attorney General Suthers by a Large Margin to Serve a Full, Four-Year Term
Table of Contents Office of the Attorney General 4 Consumer Protection 7 Criminal Justice 15 Appellate Division 21 Natural Resources 24 State Services 29 Civil Litigation and Employment Law 32 Business and Licensing 36 4 COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN SUTHERS Attorney General John W. Suthers On January 4, 2005, John W. Suthers was appointed as Coloradoʼs 37th Attorney General. In November of 2006, the voters of Colorado elected Attorney General Suthers by a large margin to serve a full, four-year term. As Attorney General, Suthers is charged with representing and defend- ing the interests of the People of the State of Colorado, and serves as chief legal counsel and advisor to state gov- ernment, its statewide elected officials, and its many state agencies, boards, and commissions. Attorney General Suthers graduated magna cum laude from the University of Notre Dame with a degree in government in 1974, and from the University of Colorado Law School in 1977. From 1977 to 1981, he served as a deputy and chief deputy district attorney in Colorado Springs. From September of 1979 to January of 1981, he headed the Economic Crime Division of the DAʼs office and co- authored a nationally published book on consumer fraud and white-collar crime. In January of 1981, Mr. Suthers entered private practice as a litigation partner in Colorado Springs firm of Sparks Dix, P.C. He remained with the firm until Novem- ber of 1988, when he ran against and defeated the incumbent district attorney for the 4th Judicial District. He was elected to a second term as district attorney in 1992. -
COS Annual Single Page Version
2019 ANNUAL REPORT Table of contents Letter from the Director 4 Air service 5 Financials 7 Growth at COS 8 Destinations 10 Celebrations 11 Peterson Air Force Base 13 Airport improvements 14 Business development 15 Economic impact 16 Volunteers 17 Comission and Task Force members 18 3 Celebrating a big year A message from our director, Greg Phillips For those traveling over the past year, you saw firsthand that it was a Welcome to Colorado Springs Airport’s year of construction in the COS terminal following the tragic terminal (COS) first ever Annual Report 2019 was fire that occurred on April 16, 2018 I’m happy to note that 2019 marked a tremendous year for COS and there are the completion of most of the terminal renovations and upgrades, with so many great things happening at the only a few projects left for completion in 2020 When complete, the Airport It’s my sincere pleasure to share entire public side of the terminal on all three floors will have been fully in this report the progress our team has renovated and updated to brand new standards If you haven’t seen it yet, made in order to better serve all our stop by I think you’ll be impressed citizens over the last year Here are a few of the highlights you’ll find in this report For general aviation, this past year also marked continued growth, where we saw a number of hangars constructed for westside tenants, First, in air service, 2019 continued a trend including a significant expansion by the world class National Museum of growth at COS in a number of ways, of WWII Aviation For -
Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report Summarizes Water Quality Conditions in the State of Colorado
Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report State of Colorado Prepared Pursuant to Section 303(d) and Section 305(b) of the Clean Water Act 2012 Update to the 2010 305(b) Report Prepared by: Water Quality Control Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment From the highest sand dunes in Executive Summary North America to 54 mountain peaks over 14,000 feet, Colorado has one of the most unique and varied natural The Colorado 2012 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report summarizes water quality conditions in the State of Colorado. This landscapes in the entire nation. report fulfills Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 305(b) which requires all Throughout the state, there exist states to assess and report on the quality of waters within their State. This lush green forests, fields of report fulfills Colorado’s obligation under the Clean Water Act, and covers vibrant wildflowers, picturesque the 2010-2011 two-year period. mountain lakes, abundant grasslands and rich red rock formations. There are many This report provides the State’s assessments of water quality that were places to enjoy Colorado’s vast conducted during the past five years. Specifically, it compares the classified natural beauty, with four uses of all surface waters within the State to the corresponding standards in national parks, five national order to assess the degree to which waters are in attainment of those monuments and 41 state parks standards. The Integrated Report (IR) provides the attainment status of all waiting to be explored. surface waters according to the 5 reporting categories, defined in detail within. -
Who Runs Our Cities? the Political Gender Gap in the Top 100 U.S
Who Runs Our Cities? The Political Gender Gap in the Top 100 U.S. Cities SEPTEMBER 2016 This report is authored by the staff of the CUNY Institute for State and Local Governance: Jocelyn Drummond, Qian Zhang, and Victoria Lawson ABOUT THE CUNY INSTITUTE FOR STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNANCE The CUNY Institute for State and Local Governance’s mission is to bridge the gap between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers using data and research to help government produce better results, worthy of public investment and trust. Our expertise includes data analysis for a wide array of purposes—including cost-benefit analysis, performance evaluation, and the development of performance indicators—and fiscal management for both short- and long-term planning. ABOUT THE EQUALITY INDICATORS The Equality Indicators measure progress toward achieving greater equality in New York City and other cities in the United States and internationally. This report was made possible by the generous support of the Rockefeller Foundation. We are indebted to Besiki Kutateladze, former ISLG Research Director, for his ideas and guidance. FOR MORE INFORMATION CUNY Institute for State and Local Governance 10 East 34th Street, 5th floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: 646-664-3481 Email: [email protected] Websites: islg.cuny.edu and equalityindicators.org CUNY Institute for State and Local Governance i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY omen comprise half of the U.S. and world populations but are highly underrepresented at all levels of government. The consequences of the gender gap in political leadership go beyond issues of democratic Wrepresentation. Studies have found that, on average, women elected officials introduce more legislation than men, and that they do so on a wide range of issues, from health and education to infrastructure and the environment. -
Historiccos (Colorado Springs Historic Preservation Plan)
HistoricPRESERVING THE CHARACTER OFC THE COMMUNITYOS Historic Preservation Plan City of Colorado Springs December 2019 HistoricCOS PRESERVING THE CHARACTER OF THE COMMUNITY Section 1.1 HistoricCOS: Preserving the Character of the Community - December 2019 HistoricCOS PRESERVING THE CHARACTER OF THE COMMUNITY A Message from MAYOR SUTHERS As the Mayor of our fine City, I am proud of the collaborative and inclusive process that was undertaken to create HistoricCOS, the first new Historic Preservation Plan since 1993. This Plan affirms that the City is more than a collection of roads and buildings, it is a “palate of place” where the stories of those who came before us are appreciated and celebrated. I am appreciative of all the community members who participated and took time to help shape this Plan, as it will enhance and guide preservation efforts in the City for years to come. The HistoricCOS Preservation Plan celebrates the legacies of our founders and those that have followed; together our City can embrace its past and be ready to share its heritage. Through HistoricCOS, preservation in the City of Colorado Springs is best understood at the neighborhood level and influenced by willing and active members of the community. The acceptance and incorporation of historic and cultural resources is a central part of the ongoing economic and community development strategy of the City. Thank you again to all the members of our community who have contributed to the active protection and utilization of our irreplaceable resources. Sincerely, John Suthers Mayor HistoricCOS: Preserving the Character of the Community - December 2019 iii HistoricCOS PRESERVING THE CHARACTER OF THE COMMUNITY This project has been funded in part by a grant from the Peter Grant Fund for Colorado of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. -
Colorado's 303(D) List of Impaired Waters
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT WATER QUALITY CONTROL COMMISSION 5 CCR 1002-93 REGULATION #93 COLORADO'S SECTION 303(D) LIST OF IMPAIRED WATERS AND MONITORING AND EVALUATION LIST 93.1 Authority These regulations are promulgated pursuant to section 25-8-101 et seq C.R.S. as amended, and in particular, 25-8-202 (1) (a), (b), (i), (2) and (6); 25-8-203 and 25-8-204. 93.2 Purpose This regulation establishes Colorado’s Lists of Impaired Waters. These waters include Water- Quality-Limited Segments Requiring Total Maximum Daily Loads (“TMDLs”), impaired waters that do not require a TMDL, and Colorado’s Monitoring and Evaluation List: (1) The list of Water-Quality-Limited Segments Requiring TMDLs fulfills requirements of section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act which requires that states submit to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency a list of those waters for which technology-based effluent limitations and other required controls are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards. These segments are included in Section 93.3 with parameters included in the Clean Water Section 303(d) Impairment column. (2) Colorado’s Monitoring and Evaluation List identifies water bodies where there is reason to suspect water quality problems, but there is also uncertainty regarding one or more factors, such as the representative nature of the data. Water bodies that are impaired, but it is unclear whether the cause of impairment is attributable to pollutants as opposed to pollution, are also placed on the Monitoring and Evaluation List. This Monitoring and Evaluation list is a state-only document that is not subject to EPA approval. -
In the Supreme Court of the United States ______
No. 08-769 In the Supreme Court of the United States ________________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Petitioner, v. ROBERT J. STEVENS, Respondent. __________________________________ On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ___________________________________ BRIEF OF FLORIDA, ALABAMA, ARKANSAS, ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MARYLAND, MICHIGAN, MISSISSIPPI, MONTANA, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW MEXICO, NORTH CAROLINA, OHIO, RHODE ISLAND, SOUTH CAROLINA, TEXAS, UTAH, VIRGINIA and WEST VIRGINIA, AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ___________________________________ BILL MCCOLLUM Attorney General of Florida Scott D. Makar* Solicitor General Timothy D. Osterhaus Craig D. Feiser Deputy Solicitors General PL-01, The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1050 850-414-3300 850-410-2672 fax Counsel for Amicus Curiae State of Florida *Counsel of Record Attorney General Troy King Office of the Alabama Attorney General 500 Dexter Avenue Montgomery, AL 36130 Dustin McDaniel Attorney General of Arkansas 200 Tower Bldg. 323 Center St. Little Rock, AR 72201-2610 Terry Goddard Attorney General of Arizona 1275 W. Washington St. Phoenix, AZ 85007 Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Attorney General of California 1300 I St., Ste. 1740 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 John Suthers Attorney General of Colorado 1525 Sherman Street Denver, CO 80203 Richard Blumenthal Attorney General State of Connecticut 55 Elm St. Hartford, CT 06106 Mark J. Bennett Attorney General of Hawaii 425 Queen Street Honolulu, HI 96813 Lisa Madigan Attorney General of Illinois 100 West Randolph Street Chicago, IL 60601 Gregory F. Zoeller Attorney General of Indiana Indiana Gov’t Center South, 5th Floor 302 W. -
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
Case 2:11-cv-01072-SRB Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 1 of 30 1 THOMAS C. HORNE Attorney General 2 Firm Bar No. 14000 3 Kevin D. Ray, No. 007485 4 Lori S. Davis, No. 027875 Aubrey Joy Corcoran, No. 025423 5 Assistant Attorneys General 6 1275 West Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 85007-2926 7 Telephone: (602) 542-8309 8 Facsimile: (602) 542-8308 Email: [email protected] 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 10 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 13 STATE OF ARIZONA; JANICE K. 14 BREWER, Governor of the State of Arizona, Case No. 15 in her Official Capacity; WILL HUMBLE, Director of the Arizona Department of 16 Health Services, in his Official Capacity; ROBERT C. HALLIDAY, Director of the 17 Arizona Department of Public Safety, in his COMPLAINT FOR 18 Official Capacity; DECLARATORY JUDGMENT 19 Plaintiffs, 20 vs. 21 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED 22 STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of 23 the United States of America, in his Official 24 Capacity; DENNIS K. BURKE, United States Attorney for the District of Arizona, in 25 his Official Capacity; ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF DISPENSARY 26 PROFESSIONALS, INC., an Arizona 27 corporation; JOSHUA LEVINE; PAULA Case 2:11-cv-01072-SRB Document 1 Filed 05/27/11 Page 2 of 30 1 PENNYPACKER; DR. NICHOLAS FLORES; JANE CHRISTENSEN; PAULA 2 POLLOCK; SERENITY ARIZONA, INC., 3 an Arizona nonprofit corporation; HOLISTIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 4 INC., an Arizona nonprofit corporation; 5 JEFF SILVA; ARIZONA MEDICAL MARIJUANA ASSOCIATION; DOES I-X; 6 DOES XI-XX; 7 Defendants. -
INDIVIDUAL DONORS Mr
Car e and INDIVIDUAL DONORS Mr. and Mrs. Lonnie Adams Ms. Mary Adams Ms. Mary Anne Abbate Mr. and Mrs. Samuel Adams Ms. Renee Abbe Mr. Steve Adams Ms. Marjory Abbott Mr. Tilmon Adams Mr. and Mrs. Steven Abbott Ms. Kimberly Adams-Johnson Mr. and Mrs. Donald Abdallah Mrs. Alda Adcox Mr. and Mrs. Scott Abell Ms. Constance Addington Ms. Mary Lou Abernathy Mr. and Mrs. D. V. Addington Mr. David Abeyta Ms. Linda Addington Mr. Floyd Abeyta Ms. Vicky Addison Mr. and Mrs. Mel Abeyta Ms. Deirdre Aden-Smith Mrs. Dorothy Abrue Ms. Carol Adkisson Ms. Katrina Achivida Ms. Louise Adler Mr. and Mrs. Edward Achtenberg Ms. Kristie Adler Hawkins Ms. Clara Ackerman Mr. and Mrs. James Adley Mr. Mitchell Ackerman Mr. and Mrs. Dana Adoretti Ms. Wanda Ackor Ms. Wendy Adrian Mr. Ivan Acosta Mr. and Mrs. Glen Agajanian Mr. and Mrs. George Acree Mrs. Joan Agee Rosie Adair and Alfred Coxe Erika and Kiyoshi Agena Mr. Paul Adam Mr. and Mrs. Billy Ager Ms. Sally Adame Mr. and Mrs. Gerald Ager Jr. Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Adams Ms. Marilyn Ager Mr. and Mrs. Charles Adams Mr. and Mrs. Mark Aggers Mr. Dale Adams Mr. and Mrs. Gary Agnes Deborah Adams and Charles Campbell Mr. Todd Agthe LTC and Mrs. Donald Adams (Ret) Mr. and Mrs. Albert Aguilar Mr. and Mrs. Ernest Adams Mr. and Mrs. Charles Aguilar Frances and Linda Adams Mr. and Mrs. Erwin Aguilar Mr. and Mrs. Garth Adams Mr. Robert Aguilar Mr. and Mrs. Gary Adams Mr. and Mrs. Theodore Aguilar Ms. Karen Adams Ms.