DOCSLIB.ORG

Rocks and Geology in the San Francisco Bay Region

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rocks and Geology in the San Francisco Bay Region Rocks and Geology in the San Francisco Bay Region ������� ����� ��������� �������� ���� ������ ��� ��������� �������� ��������� �������� ������ ������ ������ ����� ����� ������ ����������� ����� ����������� ����� ��������� ������������ ���� ���� ������� ���� ������ ���� ������� �������� ������ ��� ����� �� ����� ������ ��� ����� ������ Bulletin 2195 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey This page intentionally left blank Rocks and Geology in the San Francisco Bay Region By Philip Stoffer Bulletin 2195 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey 1 U.S. Department of the Interior Gale A. Norton, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2002 Electronic copies of this publication are available online at http://geopubs.wr.usgs.gov/bulletin/b2195/ Additional USGS publications can be found online at http://geology.usgs.gov/products.html For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS (1–888–275–8747) World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Published in the Western Region, Menlo Park, California Manuscript approved for publication, September 30, 2002 Text and illustrations edited by James W. Hendley II Production and design by Susan Mayfield III Contents Introduction............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Geologic time....................................................................................................................................................... 2 The rock cycle..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Plate tectonics.....................................................................................................................................................4 Active versus passive continental margins....................................................................................................7 Evolution of the San Andreas Fault system.................................................................................................... 9 Generalized geologic map of the San Francisco Bay region.....................................................................12 Igneous rocks and processes.............................................................................................................................. 13 Classification of igneous rocks.......................................................................................................................14 Intrusive igneous rocks....................................................................................................................................15 Granite........................................................................................................................................................... 15 Granodiorite..................................................................................................................................................15 Why are there felsic intrusive igneous rocks in the San Francisco Bay region?.................................. 16 Diorite............................................................................................................................................................ 17 Gabbro........................................................................................................................................................... 17 Rocks from the mantle?....................................................................................................................................18 Pyroxenite..................................................................................................................................................... 19 Peridotite.......................................................................................................................................................19 Chromite ore................................................................................................................................................. 19 Anorthosite................................................................................................................................................... 20 Jade............................................................................................................................................................... 20 Extrusive igneous rocks................................................................................................................................... 20 Basalt.............................................................................................................................................................20 Andesite........................................................................................................................................................ 21 Rhyolite..........................................................................................................................................................21 Pillow basalt—how does it form?.................................................................................................................. 21 Volcanic rocks in the San Francisco Bay region.........................................................................................22 Pinnacles volcanic area—a national monument for half a volcano........................................................23 Hydrothermal deposits..................................................................................................................................... 23 Travertine...................................................................................................................................................... 23 Hydrothermally altered basalt................................................................................................................... 24 Calc-silicate rock.........................................................................................................................................24 Springs, warm springs, and hot springs and their deposits.......................................................................24 Cinnabar (mercury ore) and the New Almaden Mining District................................................................25 Sedimentary rocks and processes......................................................................................................................26 Soil....................................................................................................................................................................... 28 Layers in sedimentary rock............................................................................................................................. 29 What strata can reveal about earth history..................................................................................................30 Sediments and sedimentary deposits............................................................................................................31 Sedimentary rocks............................................................................................................................................ 32 Conglomerate............................................................................................................................................... 32 Sandstone..................................................................................................................................................... 34 Graywacke—an old sedimentary rock term with a new meaning..................................................... 36 Mudstone and siltstone.............................................................................................................................. 37 Marlstone......................................................................................................................................................37 Shale.............................................................................................................................................................. 38 Limestone and dolostone........................................................................................................................... 39 Concretions—nature’s time capsules......................................................................................................40 Chert...............................................................................................................................................................41 Gypsum..........................................................................................................................................................42 2 III Rock salt........................................................................................................................................................42 Limestone versus chert and the carbonate compensation depth (CCD).................................................43 Organic residues and rocks (petroleum and coal)......................................................................................44 Asphalt...........................................................................................................................................................45
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Petition to List Mountain Lion As Threatened Or Endangered Species
    BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME COMMISSION A Petition to List the Southern California/Central Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) of Mountain Lions as Threatened under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) A Mountain Lion in the Verdugo Mountains with Glendale and Los Angeles in the background. Photo: NPS Center for Biological Diversity and the Mountain Lion Foundation June 25, 2019 Notice of Petition For action pursuant to Section 670.1, Title 14, California Code of Regulations (CCR) and Division 3, Chapter 1.5, Article 2 of the California Fish and Game Code (Sections 2070 et seq.) relating to listing and delisting endangered and threatened species of plants and animals. I. SPECIES BEING PETITIONED: Species Name: Mountain Lion (Puma concolor). Southern California/Central Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) II. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Listing as Threatened or Endangered The Center for Biological Diversity and the Mountain Lion Foundation submit this petition to list mountain lions (Puma concolor) in Southern and Central California as Threatened or Endangered pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act (California Fish and Game Code §§ 2050 et seq., “CESA”). This petition demonstrates that Southern and Central California mountain lions are eligible for and warrant listing under CESA based on the factors specified in the statute and implementing regulations. Specifically, petitioners request listing as Threatened an Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) comprised of the following recognized mountain lion subpopulations:
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii Volcanoes National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/163 THIS PAGE: Geologists have lloongng been monimonittoorriing the volcanoes of Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park. Here lalava cascades durduriingng the 1969-1971 Mauna Ulu eruption of Kīlauea VolVolcano. NotNotee the Mauna Ulu fountountaiain in the background. U.S. Geologiogicalcal SurSurvveyey PhotPhotoo by J. B. Judd (12/30/1969). ON THE COVER: ContContiinuouslnuouslyy eruptuptiingng since 1983, Kīllaueaauea Volcano contcontiinues to shapshapee Hawai‘Hawai‘i VoVollccanoes NatiNationalonal ParkPark.. Photo courtesy Lisa Venture/UniversiUniversitty of Cincinnati. Hawai‘i Volcanoes National Park Geologic Resources Inventory Report Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/GRD/NRR—2009/163 Geologic Resources Division Natural Resource Program Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, Colorado 80225 December 2009 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Denver, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner.
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda, a Geographical History, by Imelda Merlin
    Alameda A Geographical History by Imelda Merlin Friends of the Alameda Free Library Alameda Museum Alameda, California 1 Copyright, 1977 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 77-73071 Cover picture: Fernside Oaks, Cohen Estate, ca. 1900. 2 FOREWORD My initial purpose in writing this book was to satisfy a partial requirement for a Master’s Degree in Geography from the University of California in Berkeley. But, fortunate is the student who enjoys the subject of his research. This slim volume is essentially the original manuscript, except for minor changes in the interest of greater accuracy, which was approved in 1964 by Drs. James Parsons, Gunther Barth and the late Carl Sauer. That it is being published now, perhaps as a response to a new awareness of and interest in our past, is due to the efforts of the “Friends of the Alameda Free Library” who have made a project of getting my thesis into print. I wish to thank the members of this organization and all others, whose continued interest and perseverance have made this publication possible. Imelda Merlin April, 1977 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer wishes to acknowledge her indebtedness to the many individuals and institutions who gave substantial assistance in assembling much of the material treated in this thesis. Particular thanks are due to Dr. Clarence J. Glacken for suggesting the topic. The writer also greatly appreciates the interest and support rendered by the staff of the Alameda Free Library, especially Mrs. Hendrine Kleinjan, reference librarian, and Mrs. Myrtle Richards, curator of the Alameda Historical Society. The Engineers’ and other departments at the Alameda City Hall supplied valuable maps an information on the historical development of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara County Angler Survey: Final Report
    Santa Clara County Angler Survey: Final Report Mark Seelos November 28, 2018 Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 2 General Background 3 3 Regulatory Background 4 4 Purpose 4 5 Survey Methodology 5 6 Results 6 6.1 Respondent Demographics . .6 6.2 Fish Consumption . .7 6.3 Awareness . .8 6.4 Health Risk . .9 7 Discussion 10 7.1 Respondent Demographics . 10 7.2 Fish Consumption . 12 7.3 Advisory Awareness . 12 7.4 Health Risk . 12 8 Recommendations 13 9 Acknowledgments 14 10 Figures 15 List of Figures 1 Water Bodies Included in Survey . .6 2 Surveys Conducted at Each Water Body . 15 3 Ethnicities of Anglers Interviewed . 16 4 Ages of Anglers Interviewed . 16 5 Counties of Residence of Anglers Interviewed . 17 6 Median Incomes of Angler Zip Codes . 17 7 Reservoir and Plan for Catch . 17 8 Ethnicity and Plan for Catch . 18 9 Age and Plan for Catch . 18 10 Consumption by Median Income of Zip Code . 19 11 Information Sources where Anglers Learned of Advisories . 19 12 Awareness of Health Advisories by Ethnicity . 20 13 Health Advisory Awareness and Fish Consumption by Ethnicity . 20 14 Awareness of Health Advisories by Age . 21 15 Health Advisory Awareness and Fish Consumption by Age . 21 16 Health Advisory Awareness by Income . 22 17 Health Advisory Awareness and Fish Consumption by Income . 22 1 18 Sign Density and Fish Consumption . 23 19 Anglers who Feed Catch to High-Risk Groups . 23 20 Local vs. Commercial Fish Consumption of Anglers who have Ever Eaten Catch . 24 21 Monthly Consumption of locally caught Fish by Anglers who have Ever Eaten Catch 24 22 Percentage of Times Fished vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology Glossary from the Roadside Geology of Minnesota, Richard W
    Minnesota Bedrock Geology Glossary From the Roadside Geology of Minnesota, Richard W. Ojakangas Sedimentary Rock Types in Minnesota Rocks that formed from the consolidation of loose sediment Conglomerate: A coarse-grained sedimentary rock composed of pebbles, cobbles, or boul- ders set in a fine-grained matrix of silt and sand. Dolostone: A sedimentary rock composed of the mineral dolomite, a calcium magnesium car- bonate. Graywacke: A sedimentary rock made primarily of mud and sand, often deposited by turbidi- ty currents. Iron-formation: A thinly bedded sedimentary rock containing more than 15 percent iron. Limestone: A sedimentary rock composed of calcium carbonate. Mudstone: A sedimentary rock composed of mud. Sandstone: A sedimentary rock made primarily of sand. Shale: A deposit of clay, silt, or mud solidified into more or less a solid rock. Siltstone: A sedimentary rock made primarily of sand. Igneous and Volcanic Rock Types in Minnesota Rocks that solidified from cooling of molten magma Basalt: A black or dark grey volcanic rock that consists mainly of microscopic crystals of pla- gioclase feldspar, pyroxene, and perhaps olivine. Diorite: A plutonic igneous rock intermediate in composition between granite and gabbro. Gabbro: A dark igneous rock consisting mainly of plagioclase and pyroxene in crystals large enough to see with a simple magnifier. Gabbro has the same composition as basalt but contains much larger mineral grains because it cooled at depth over a longer period of time. Granite: An igneous rock composed mostly of orthoclase feldspar and quartz in grains large enough to see without using a magnifier. Most granites also contain mica and amphibole Rhyolite: A felsic (light-colored) volcanic rock, the extrusive equivalent of granite.
    [Show full text]
  • Poroelastic Responses of Confined Aquifers to Subsurface Strain And
    Solid Earth, 6, 1207–1229, 2015 www.solid-earth.net/6/1207/2015/ doi:10.5194/se-6-1207-2015 © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Poroelastic responses of confined aquifers to subsurface strain and their use for volcano monitoring K. Strehlow, J. H. Gottsmann, and A. C. Rust School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Wills Memorial Building, Bristol BS8 1RJ, UK Correspondence to: K. Strehlow ([email protected]) Received: 11 May 2015 – Published in Solid Earth Discuss.: 9 June 2015 Revised: 18 September 2015 – Accepted: 21 October 2015 – Published: 10 November 2015 Abstract. Well water level changes associated with mag- aquifer and are commonly neglected in analytical models. matic unrest can be interpreted as a result of pore pressure These findings highlight the need for numerical models for changes in the aquifer due to crustal deformation, and so the interpretation of observed well level signals. However, could provide constraints on the subsurface processes caus- simulated water table changes do indeed mirror volumetric ing this strain. We use finite element analysis to demonstrate strain, and wells are therefore a valuable addition to monitor- the response of aquifers to volumetric strain induced by pres- ing systems that could provide important insights into pre- surized magma reservoirs. Two different aquifers are invoked eruptive dynamics. – an unconsolidated pyroclastic deposit and a vesicular lava flow – and embedded in an impermeable crust, overlying a magma chamber. The time-dependent, fully coupled models simulate crustal deformation accompanying chamber pres- 1 Introduction surization and the resulting hydraulic head changes as well as flow through the porous aquifer, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • About WETA Present Future a Plan for Expanded Bay Area Ferry Service
    About WETA Maintenance Facility will consolidate Central and South Bay fleet operations, include a fueling facility with emergency fuel The San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation storage capacity, and provide an alternative EOC location, Authority (WETA) is a regional public transit agency tasked with thereby significantly expanding WETA’s emergency response operating and expanding ferry service on the San Francisco and recovery capabilities. Bay, and is responsible for coordinating the water transit response to regional emergencies. Future Present WETA is planning for a system that seamlessly connects cities in the greater Bay Area with San Francisco, using Today, WETA operates daily passenger ferry service to the fast, environmentally responsible vessels, with wait times cities of Alameda, Oakland, San Francisco, Vallejo, and South of 15 minutes or less during peak commute hours. WETA’s San Francisco, carr4$)"(*- /#)тѵр million passengers 2035 vision would expand service throughout the Bay Area, annually under the San Francisco Bay Ferry brand. Over the operating 12 services at 16 terminals with a fleet of 44 vessels. last five years, SF Bay Ferry ridership has grown чф percent. In the near term, WETA will launch a Richmond/San Francisco route (201ш) and new service to Treasure Island. Other By the Numbers terminal sites such as Seaplane Lagoon in Alameda, Berkeley, Mission Bay, Redwood City, the South Bay, and the Carquinez *- /#)ǔǹǒ --$ ./-).+*-/0+ Strait are on the not-too-distant horizon. ($''$*)-$ -. /*ǗǕǑ$& .-*.. 0. 4 --4 /# 4 #4ǹ 1 -44 -ǹ A Plan for Expanded Bay Area Ferry Service --4-$ -.#$+ 1 )! --$ . Vallejo #.$)- . /*!' / /2 )ǓǑǒǘ CARQUINEZ STRAIT Ǚǖʞ.$) ǓǑǒǓǹ )ǓǑǓǑǹ Hercules WETA Expansion Targets Richmond Funded Traveling by ferry has become increasingly more popular in • Richmond Berkeley the Bay Area, as the economy continues to improve and the • Treasure Island Partially Funded Pier 41 Treasure Island population grows.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Tectonics of the Central and Southern Coast Ranges of California
    OVERVIEW Late Cenozoic tectonics of the central and southern Coast Ranges of California Benjamin M. Page* Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 George A. Thompson† Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2215 Robert G. Coleman Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 ABSTRACT within the Coast Ranges is ascribed in large Taliaferro (e.g., 1943). A prodigious amount of part to the well-established change in plate mo- geologic mapping by T. W. Dibblee, Jr., pre- The central and southern Coast Ranges tions at about 3.5 Ma. sented the areal geology in a form that made gen- of California coincide with the broad Pa- eral interpretations possible. E. H. Bailey, W. P. cific–North American plate boundary. The INTRODUCTION Irwin, D. L. Jones, M. C. Blake, and R. J. ranges formed during the transform regime, McLaughlin of the U.S. Geological Survey and but show little direct mechanical relation to The California Coast Ranges province encom- W. R. Dickinson are among many who have con- strike-slip faulting. After late Miocene defor- passes a system of elongate mountains and inter- tributed enormously to the present understanding mation, two recent generations of range build- vening valleys collectively extending southeast- of the Coast Ranges. Representative references ing occurred: (1) folding and thrusting, begin- ward from the latitude of Cape Mendocino (or by these and many other individuals were cited in ning ca. 3.5 Ma and increasing at 0.4 Ma, and beyond) to the Transverse Ranges. This paper Page (1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Beach Report Card Program Is Funded by Grants From
    2013-2014 Annual 2013–2014 Heal the Bay is a nonprofit environmental organization making Southern California coastal waters and watersheds, including Santa Monica Bay, safe, healthy and clean. We use science, education, community action and advocacy to pursue our mission. The Beach Report Card program is funded by grants from Swain Barber Foundation ©2014 Heal the Bay. All Rights Reserved. The fishbones logo is a trademark of Heal the Bay. The Beach Report Card is a service mark of Heal the Bay. We at Heal the Bay believe the public has the right to know the water quality at their favorite beaches. We are proud to provide West Coast residents and visitors with this information in an easy-to-understand format. We hope beachgoers will use this information to make the decisions necessary to protect their health. This page: Avalon Bay, Catalina Island Cover photo: The Wedge, Newport Beach TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE Introduction Executive Summary 6 SECTION TWO The Beach Report Card County by County Summary Reports 16 SECTION THREE BRC Impacts and News California Beach Types and Water Quality 48 The Clean Beach Initiative (CBI) 50 Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) 53 Major Beach News 55 Recommendations for the Coming Year 65 Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 70 SECTION FOUR Appendices Methodology for California 76 Methodology for Oregon and Washington 78 2013-2014 Honor Roll 80 Grades by County – California 81 Grades by County – Washington 94 Grades by County – Oregon 97 Index and Glossary 98 Acknowledgements 100 5 Executive Summary Beaches in the U.S. accommodate nearly two billion beach visits each year1 and provide enormous economic benefits to their communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinolecreeksedimentfinal
    Pinole Creek Watershed Sediment Source Assessment January 2005 Prepared by the San Francisco Estuary Institute for USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service and Contra Costa Resource Conservation District San Francisco Estuary Institute The Regional Watershed Program was founded in 1998 to assist local and regional environmental management and the public to understand, characterize and manage environmental resources in the watersheds of the Bay Area. Our intent is to help develop a regional picture of watershed condition and downstream effects through a solid foundation of literature review and peer- review, and the application of a range of science methodologies, empirical data collection and interpretation in watersheds around the Bay Area. Over this time period, the Regional Watershed Program has worked with Bay Area local government bodies, universities, government research organizations, Resource Conservation Districts (RCDs) and local community and environmental groups in the Counties of Marin, Sonoma, Napa, Solano, Contra Costa, Alameda, Santa Clara, San Mateo, and San Francisco. We have also fulfilled technical advisory roles for groups doing similar work outside the Bay Area. This report should be referenced as: Pearce, S., McKee, L., and Shonkoff, S., 2005. Pinole Creek Watershed Sediment Source Assessment. A technical report of the Regional Watershed Program, San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI), Oakland, California. SFEI Contribution no. 316, 102 pp. ii San Francisco Estuary Institute ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors gratefully
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Geology Report ER79-4: Porphyritic Intrusions and Related
    MANITOBA CANADA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND MINES MANITOBA MINERAL RESOURCES DIVISION ECONOMIC GEOLOGY REPORT ER79-4 PORPHYRITIC INTRUSIONS AND RELATED MINERALIZATION IN THE FLIN FLON VOLCANIC BELT by D.A. BALDWIN 1980 Funding for this project was provided under the cost-shared Canada-Manitoba Non-renewable Resources Evaluation Program by the Canada Department of Energy, Mines and Resources and the Manitoba Department of Mines, Resources and Environmental Management. MANITOBA DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND MINES HON. DONALD W. CRAIK PAUL E. JARVIS Minister Deputy Minister MINERAL RESOURCES DIVISION IAN HAUGH Executive Director ECONOMIC GEOLOGY REPORT ER79-4 PORPHYRITIC INTRUSIONS AND RELATED MINERALIZATION IN THE FLIN FLON VOLCANIC BELT by D.A. BALDWIN 1980 LEGEND I Cliff Lake Stock 5 Elbow Lake Stock 2 Whitefish Lake Porphyry 6 Fourmile Island Intrusion 3 Alberts Lake Intrusion 7 Chisel Lake Intrusion 4 Nisto Lake Intrusion 8 Wekusko Lake Intrusion ,~ -./ - -, I \." ~herridon '" , ;. <,.... ,1 if 55°00' 55°00' c, t,:) ,J -3 , I"" . c;? '" 1[' . ::t} \'''If!? ~,/J~ /j' ., ~), F lin.~ i;\))F ' I,".!0l~' ,d ' ;)/", ' ~.;'. l ;' ~" ,r~n ;t j; (I:/,1 ,r Lake ' \\ ;\~ ' ~i'/ 'lUi':;- -'i' //{ ,'/ , ,\" ,,/,1,1 pI , .h .(,1;' '\:. (IiI' ' .. '~'4_hl i / 'Y{j,'{:" 5 2.5 a 10 15 KILOMETRES J!) "'.t3 f3,F-"\ ---- :i~ f)J~c~. V 99°30' ">/)AfhapaplJskoj¥ !ZJ Porphyritic Intrusive Rocks 54°30' ! ,1 Lake .; ... 100°30' D Felsic Volcanic Rocks FIGURE 1: Distribution of porphyritic intrusive and felsic volcanic rocks in the Flin Flon volcanic belt, TABLE OF
    [Show full text]