Metropolitan Briefing Book, 2003
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Portland State University PDXScholar Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Publications Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies 2003 Metropolitan Briefing Book, 2003 Craig Wollner Portland State University Debra Elliot Portland State University Heike Mayer Portland State University Joseph Cortright John Provo Portland State University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/metropolitianstudies Part of the Urban Studies and Planning Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Wollner, C., Elliot, D., Mayer, H., Cortright, J., Provo, J., Seltzer, E., Edmonston, B., Pepos, E., Perlstein, G., and Johnson, S. (2003) 'Metropolitan Briefing Book, 2003' Presented by the Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies, College of Urban and Public Affairs, Portland State University. This Technical Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Publications by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Authors Craig Wollner, Debra Elliot, Heike Mayer, Joseph Cortright, John Provo, Ethan Seltzer, Barry Edmonston, Eve D. Pepos, Gary Perlstein, and Steve Johnson This technical report is available at PDXScholar: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/metropolitianstudies/93 Metropolitan Briefing Book 2003 Presented by Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies College of Urban and Public Affairs Portland State University is an affirmative action / equal employment opportunity institution. Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Greetings! The Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies (IMS) was created to better connect the resources of higher education to the issues and needs in the six-county, bi-state Portland- Vancouver metropolitan area (Clackamas, Clark, Columbia, Multnomah, Washington, and Yamhill counties). We have included the IMS mission statement and a roster of the IMS board members in this publication to give readers a clear sense of who we are and how we serve the region. You can find out about all of our initiatives, and download additional copies of this publication, from our web site: www.upa.pdx.edu/IMS/. We’ve developed the Metropolitan Briefing Book to provide elected and appointed leaders, citizens and educators, with information about issues and trends common to all corners of our region. Our purpose is neither to create an agenda nor to reshape historic patterns of gover- nance. Rather, IMS provides this information as a means of stimulating debate, discussion, and collaborative action. The Institute stands ready to assist with making connections and finding new partners, thereby putting the information we have provided here to work on behalf of indi- vidual communities and the broader metropolitan area. This fourth edition of Metropolitan Briefing Book begins, as usual, with a report of the results from the IMS 2002 Critical Issues Survey. Following that is another regular feature, an updating of the region’s demographic profile by Barry Edmonston and Eve Pepos of the Portland State University Center for Population Research and Census. Heike Mayer reports in Metropedia on emerging industry clusters in the region’s economy, and a team of researchers contributes a study on economic development strategy in the metro- politan area. Gary Perlstein, one of the nation’s foremost experts on terrorism, provides an overview of the impact of terror on our region since September 11. Finally, Steve Johnson, a longtime observer of and activist in environmental policy, has crafted an in-depth report on the state of efforts to achieve sustainability in the region, complete with an inventory of sustainable businesses. Please call IMS directly if something here catches your eye. We would be happy to share with you whatever additional data we have to help you put that information to work for your pur- poses. We sponsor a number of events yearly and put out a regular series of publications. We also want to hear from you about how we can make this publication better in the future. Finally, our thanks go to our contributors and to the Portland State University Publications Office for their customary outstanding work. Without their assistance, Briefing Book would not be possible. ETHAN SELTZER CRAIG WOLLNER Director, Institute for Portland Metropolitan Studies Editor, Briefing Book [email protected] [email protected] 1 Metropolitan Briefing Book Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Table of contents Overview: Critical Issues 2002 ........................................................................................5 Metropedia: Emerging Industry Clusters and the Region’s Recent Economic History....15 A Regional Economic Development Strategy for the Portland Area? ..............................31 Population Dynamics in the Portland-Vancouver Metropolitan Area ..............................39 Security During a Time of Terrorism ..............................................................................51 The Ark of Sustainability: The Shape of Portland’s Sustainability Infrastructure at the Turn of the Century ................................................53 3 Institute of Portland Metropolitan Studies Critical Issues 2002 By Craig Wollner, Senior Fellow, IMS Multnomah, Washington, and Yamhill counties in and Debra Elliot and the staff of the Oregon and Clark in Washington) feel are the impor- Survey Research Laboratory, PSU tant issues facing the communities and the region. The sample included 1480 completed responses from per- sons randomly selected from households in the metro- I. Introduction politan region. Below are the findings of the latest Critical Issues List In the second phase of the survey project, a mail- surveys. Every two years, the Institute of Portland back survey instrument containing the questions put to Metropolitan Studies conducts a research initiative to those contacted by phone was sent to that portion of define the most compelling concerns, problems, and the IMS mailing list residing in the counties of the dilemmas facing the citizens of the Portland metropoli- region. This list consists largely of elected and appoint- tan region. Gathered under the title The Critical Issues ed officials, academic experts, and citizen activists. Of List, the results present to policy makers, activists, and 3,390 surveys sent, 398 were returned completed for a citizens alike a compelling agenda for the foreseeable response rate of 12 percent. Although this rate is low, future. SRL confirms that it is consistent with rates for other The Survey Research Laboratory (SRL) at Portland recent surveys using the mail-back methodology. State University (PSU) conducted the 2002 study Together, these surveys provide a glimpse of the vision under the direction of Dr. Debra Elliot under the aus- of citizens and their leaders in the Portland area about pices of the PSU Office of Graduate Studies and its prospects—the perils, the challenges, the opportu- Research. The methodology employed to ferret out the nities that confront all of us who care about the future most important issues for the region is a painstaking of this remarkable place. one that emphasizes the importance of the views of both leaders and citizens. Employing a slate of time- III. Any other critical issues facing the tested public policy issues on the future of the area, metropolitan region not listed SRL interviewers conducted a random survey of the Although respondents to both surveys mentioned other region’s citizens by telephone. The telephone survey issues, none was mentioned significantly in either or was completed in November 2002. It was designed to both instruments. Issues raised included the following: assess what residents in the six-county metropolitan alcohol treatment, diversification of industry, strength- region (consisting of Clackamas, Columbia, ening the role of religion, parks and recreation, agricul- II. The 2002 metropolitan Critical Issues List according to the general public, compared to 2000 (in priority order) 2002 2000 1. Lifelong quality education 1. Access to affordable health care 2. Strong economy and jobs 2. Lifelong quality education 3. Access to affordable health care 3. Public safety concerns 4. Public safety concerns 4. Strong economy and jobs 5. Visionary, credible leadership 5. Protection and enhancement of environment 6. Protection and enhancement of environment 6. Visionary, credible leadership 7. Diverse, integrated transportation 7. Diverse, integrated transportation 8. Containing growth / UGBs 8. Containing growth / UGBs 9. Valuing diverse racial, ethnic backgrounds 9. Valuing diverse racial, ethnic backgrounds 10. Diverse, affordable housing 10. Diverse, affordable housing 5 Metropolitan Briefing Book The 2002 and 2000 Critical Issues List according to opinion leaders (in priority order) 2002 2000 1. Strong economy and jobs 1. Lifelong quality education 2. Lifelong quality education 2. Strong economy and jobs 3. Visionary, credible leadership 3. Diverse, integrated transportation system 4. Diverse, integrated transportation system 4. Protection and enhancement of environment 5. Access to affordable health care 5. Containing growth within UGBs 6. Protection and enhancement of environment 6. Visionary, credible leadership 7. Containing growth within UGBs 7. Valuing diverse racial, ethnic backgrounds 8. Diverse, affordable housing 8. Diverse, affordable housing (tie) 9.