DOCSLIB.ORG

Getting Involved in Fleet Electrification

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GETTING INVOLVED IN FLEET ELECTRIFICATION OPPORTUNITIES FOR PUBLIC POWER Prepared by Patricia Taylor, Manager, Regulatory Policy and Business Programs and Jill Allen, Regulatory Affairs Specialist, with assistance from Burns & McDonnell for the American Public Power Association November 2019 The American Public Power Association thanks the external reviewers who supported the development of the report, including: Paul Brooker, University of Central Florida, on Assignment to Orlando Utilities Commission, Orlando, Florida Joe Empert, Amy Posner, Dan Raudebaugh, and Alison Smyth, Center for Transportation and the Environment, Atlanta, Georgia Thor Hinckley, Forth, Portland, Oregon Lisa Jerram, American Public Transportation Association, Washington, DC Tom Sagstetter, Elk River Municipal Utilities, Elk River, Minnesota Jennifer Wallace-Brodeur, VEIC, Burlington, Vermont Pete Westlake, Orlando Utilities Commission, Orlando, Florida Kevin Wood, Center for Sustainable Energy, San Diego, California The authors also thank the following Association staff members for their review: Sarah Czufin, Government Relations Director Alex Hofmann, Senior Director, Energy and Environmental Services Mike Hyland, Senior Vice President, Engineering Services Susan Partain, Senior Editor & Content Strategist Delia Patterson, Senior Vice President, Advocacy and Communications and General Counsel Paul Zummo, Director, Policy Research and Analysis The American Public Power Association is the voice of not-for-profit, community-owned utilities that power 2,000 towns and cities nationwide. We represent public power before the federal government to protect the interests of the more than 49 million people that public power utilities serve, and the 93,000 people they employ. Our association advocates and advises on electricity policy, technology, trends, training, and operations. Our members strengthen their communities by providing superior service, engag-ing citizens, and instilling pride in community-owned power. © 2019 American Public Power Association www.PublicPower.org Contact [email protected] or 202-467-2900 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 3 MOTIVATIONS FOR FLEET ELECTRIFICATION ....................................................................................... 4 POLICIES OR LEGISLATION .................................................................................................................. 4 LOAD GROWTH .................................................................................................................................... 5 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE SAVINGS ...................................................................................... 6 LEAD BY EXAMPLE ............................................................................................................................... 6 ENVIRONMENTAL ................................................................................................................................. 7 PUBLIC HEALTH .................................................................................................................................... 7 NOISE REDUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 7 CONSIDERATIONS FOR FLEET ELECTRIFICATION ............................................................................... 8 COORDINATION .................................................................................................................................... 8 COST ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE AVAILABILITY ................................................................................... 10 CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURE TYPES .............................................................................................. 11 ROUTES AND DISTANCE TRAVELED ................................................................................................. 12 OPERATIONAL NEEDS ........................................................................................................................ 12 CLIMATE .............................................................................................................................................. 13 VEHICLE OPTIONS .............................................................................................................................. 13 AGE OF VEHICLES .............................................................................................................................. 13 POTENTIAL ROLES FOR PUBLIC POWER ............................................................................................ 14 PUBLIC POWER CASE STUDIES ............................................................................................................ 16 TRENDS AND EXAMPLES ....................................................................................................................... 21 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ....................................................................................................................... 21 SCHOOL DISTRICTS ........................................................................................................................... 22 PUBLIC TRANSIT ................................................................................................................................. 22 COMMERCIAL TRUCKING .................................................................................................................. 24 TRANSPORTATION NETWORK COMPANIES AND AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES ................................ 26 CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................ 28 2 GETTING INVOLVED IN FLEET ELECTRIFICATION INTRODUCTION Electric vehicles (EVs) are poised to become the vehicle technology of choice in the coming decades. It’s not just DEFINITIONS personal vehicles that are switching to electric – the passenger vehicle an Uber driver picks riders up in and an urban n Alternative Fuel Vehicles (AFV) are typically powered delivery truck transporting goods are also making the change. by ethanol, natural gas, propane, hydrogen, biodiesel, Behind these decisions are fleet operators who are increasingly or electricity. exploring and committing to vehicle electrification, ranging from light to heavy-duty vehicles.1 n Zero Emissions Vehicles (ZEV) produce zero tailpipe emissions and are powered by batteries or hydrogen As trusted energy advisors, public power utilities can fuel cells. assist other fleet operators as they transition to EVs. This n Electric Vehicles (EV) are propelled by electric motors report is intended to guide public power utilities, state/ and include battery-powered vehicles and hydrogen- regional associations, and joint action agencies as they powered fuel cell vehicles. consider electrifying their fleet and to help them assist other l community entities who wish to electrify their fleets. Plug-in Electric Vehicles (PEV) encompass battery and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles that When public power providers electrify their fleets, they can plug into the grid for electricity to power their lead by example and gain first-hand experience with EVs and batteries. associated technology. Utilities can perform fleet assessments, m Battery Electric Vehicles (BEV) plug into conduct vehicle charging studies, and evaluate options when the grid and use only batteries to power the the vehicles are near the end of their useful life. Some utilities vehicles. may set goals about the percentage of vehicles they want to be m electric by a certain timeframe, which could be tied to local Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV) or statewide goals, whether those be specific to EV fleets or plug into the grid to charge batteries and have broader goals related to climate or sustainability. a conventional internal combustion engine to extend the driving range of the vehicle. As discussed in the American Public Power Association’s l Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEV) are powered Creating an Electric Vehicle Blueprint for Your Community: Public by hydrogen and emit water vapor through the Power Strategies, public power utilities have various options for vehicle tailpipe. The fuel cell is used to generate implementing an EV program.2 Since no two utilities are the electricity by reacting hydrogen and oxygen.3 same, EV programs should be tailored to address community n Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEV) feature an internal needs, interests, and goals. Key topic areas to consider including in an EV program are: charging infrastructure, combustion engine or other type of propulsion source education and awareness, fleet electrification, rate design, along with batteries. This type of vehicle does not plug vehicle-grid integration technologies, incentives, EV adoption, in to the grid. The batteries charge from the internal and grid impacts. combustion engine or another propulsion source and regenerative braking. This report explains how the elements of a public power n Internal Combustion Engines (ICE) are in most cars EV program connect to, and impact, EV fleet adoption. and generate mechanical power by burning liquid fuels Through highlighting public power examples alongside like
Recommended publications
  • Vondra, Benjamin H - DOA

    Vondra, Benjamin H - DOA

    Vondra, Benjamin H - DOA From: Vondra, Benjamin H - DOA Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 2:12 PM To: Larry Bean Cc: VW Settlement Wisconsin Subject: RE: EV charging stations Good afternoon Mr. Bean, Thank you for your message. 2019 Wisconsin Act 9 (2019‐21 Enacted Budget) authorized the expenditure of $25 million in VW Settlement trust funds. Accompanying administrative direction (Governor’s Veto Message) provides for expending up to $10 million on electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS). The Department of Administration is currently researching EVCS program design and no timeline for release of a funding solicitation currently exists. Please consider registering for email updates for this program by visiting the bottom of the following webpage and entering your email address. https://doa.wi.gov/Pages/vwsettlementwisconsin.aspx Please let me know if I can assist further. Ben Vondra | VW Mitigation Program Administrator Department of Administration Division of Enterprise Operations [email protected] (608) 261‐6262 From: Larry Bean Sent: Monday, August 26, 2019 11:46 AM To: Vondra, Benjamin H ‐ DOA <[email protected]> Subject: EV charging stations Ben, I was told that some of the VW settlement funds were going to be used for EV charging stations. Is this so? The Town of LaPointe, WI would like to install a station for extensive tourist use on Madeline Island. It would be in or municipal parking lot adjacent to a solar array. Let us know if these funds are available for this purpose and how to access them. Thanks. Larry Bean, Chair Energy Committee Town of LaPointe 1 Vondra, Benjamin H - DOA From: Keri Solis Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 1:54 PM To: Vondra, Benjamin H - DOA Cc: VW Settlement Wisconsin Subject: RE: EV Charging Station Grants Thanks Ben….I will go sign up for notifications.
  • Separate Financial Statements Fiscal Year 2019

    Separate Financial Statements Fiscal Year 2019

    201Separate financial9 statements PPorscheorsche TaycanTaycan TurboTurbo S 3 Content Group management report and management report of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 6 Fundamental information about the group 10 Report on economic position 12 Significant events and developments at the Porsche SE Group 12 Significant events and developments at the Volkswagen Group 20 Business development 24 Results of operations, financial position and net assets 31 Porsche Automobil Holding SE (financial statements pursuant to the German Commercial Code) 37 Sustainable value enhancement in the Porsche SE Group 41 Overall statement on the economic situation of Porsche SE and the Porsche SE Group 43 Remuneration report 44 Opportunities and risks of future development 52 Publication of the declaration of compliance and corporate governance report 78 Subsequent events 79 Forecast report and outlook 80 Glossary 85 4 Financials 86 Balance sheet of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 90 Income statement of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 91 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements 92 Independent auditor’s report 212 Responsibility statement 220 5 VVolkswagenolkswagen IID.3D.3 6 1 Group management report and management report of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 7 8 Group management report and management report of Porsche Automobil Holding SE 6 Fundamental information about the group 10 Report on economic position 12 Significant events and developments at the Porsche SE Group 12 Significant events and developments at the Volkswagen Group 20 Business development 24 Results
  • Electric Vehicle Market Status - Update Manufacturer Commitments to Future Electric Mobility in the U.S

    Electric Vehicle Market Status - Update Manufacturer Commitments to Future Electric Mobility in the U.S

    Electric Vehicle Market Status - Update Manufacturer Commitments to Future Electric Mobility in the U.S. and Worldwide September 2020 Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Drivers of Global Electric Vehicle Growth – Global Goals to Phase out Internal Combustion Engines ..... 6 Policy Drivers of U.S. Electric Vehicle Growth ........................................................................................... 8 Manufacturer Commitments ....................................................................................................................... 10 Job Creation ................................................................................................................................................ 13 Charging Network Investments .................................................................................................................. 15 Commercial Fleet Electrification Commitments ........................................................................................ 17 Sales Forecast.............................................................................................................................................. 19 Battery Pack Cost Projections and EV Price Parity ...................................................................................
  • Download PDF, 19 Pages, 505.25 KB

    Download PDF, 19 Pages, 505.25 KB

    VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT Shareholdings of Volkswagen AG and the Volkswagen Group in accordance with sections 285 and 313 of the HGB and presentation of the companies included in Volkswagen's consolidated financial statements in accordance with IFRS 12 as of 31.12.2019 Exchange rate VW AG 's interest Equity Profit/loss (1€ =) in capital in % in thousands, in thousands, Name and domicile of company Currency Dec. 31, 2019 Direct Indirect Total local currency local currency Footnote Year I. PARENT COMPANY VOLKSWAGEN AG, Wolfsburg II. SUBSIDIARIES A. Consolidated companies 1. Germany ASB Autohaus Berlin GmbH, Berlin EUR - 100.00 100.00 16,272 1,415 2018 AUDI AG, Ingolstadt EUR 99.64 - 99.64 13,701,699 - 1) 2019 Audi Berlin GmbH, Berlin EUR - 100.00 100.00 9,971 - 1) 2018 Audi Electronics Venture GmbH, Gaimersheim EUR - 100.00 100.00 60,968 - 1) 2019 Audi Frankfurt GmbH, Frankfurt am Main EUR - 100.00 100.00 8,477 - 1) 2018 Audi Hamburg GmbH, Hamburg EUR - 100.00 100.00 13,425 - 1) 2018 Audi Hannover GmbH, Hanover EUR - 100.00 100.00 16,621 - 1) 2018 AUDI Immobilien GmbH & Co. KG, Ingolstadt EUR - 100.00 100.00 82,470 3,399 2019 AUDI Immobilien Verwaltung GmbH, Ingolstadt EUR - 100.00 100.00 114,355 1,553 2019 Audi Leipzig GmbH, Leipzig EUR - 100.00 100.00 9,525 - 1) 2018 Audi München GmbH, Munich EUR - 100.00 100.00 270 - 1) 2018 Audi Real Estate GmbH, Ingolstadt EUR - 100.00 100.00 9,859 4,073 2019 Audi Sport GmbH, Neckarsulm EUR - 100.00 100.00 100 - 1) 2019 Audi Stuttgart GmbH, Stuttgart EUR - 100.00 100.00 6,677 - 1) 2018 Auto & Service PIA GmbH, Munich EUR - 100.00 100.00 19,895 - 1) 2018 Autonomous Intelligent Driving GmbH, Munich EUR - 100.00 100.00 250 - 1) 2018 Autostadt GmbH, Wolfsburg EUR 100.00 - 100.00 50 - 1) 2018 B.
  • Vehicle Fuel Efficiency

    Vehicle Fuel Efficiency

    Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Potential measures to encourage the uptake of more fuel efficient, low carbon emission vehicles Public Discussion Paper Prepared by Australian Transport Council (ATC) and Environment Protection and Heritage Council (EPHC) Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Working Group With support from The Australian Government September 2008 Closing date for comments: 7 November 2008 © Commonwealth of Australia 2008 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to Commonwealth Copyright Administration Attorney General’s Department Robert Garran Offices National Circuit Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca Disclaimer The discussion paper has been prepared by the Australian Transport Council/Environment Protection & Heritage Council Vehicle Fuel Efficiency Working Group. The opinions, comments and analysis expressed in the discussion paper are for discussion purposes only and cannot be taken in any way as an expression of current or future policy of the Australian Government nor any state or territory government. The views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or the Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts, the Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Services and Local Government, or the Minister for Climate Change and Water. While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure that the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Commonwealth does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of, or reliance on, the contents of this publication.
  • The Future of Transportation Alternative Fuel Vehicle Policies in China and United States

    The Future of Transportation Alternative Fuel Vehicle Policies in China and United States

    Clark University Clark Digital Commons International Development, Community and Master’s Papers Environment (IDCE) 12-2016 The uturF e of Transportation Alternative Fuel Vehicle Policies In China and United States JIyi Lai [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.clarku.edu/idce_masters_papers Part of the Environmental Studies Commons Recommended Citation Lai, JIyi, "The uturF e of Transportation Alternative Fuel Vehicle Policies In China and United States" (2016). International Development, Community and Environment (IDCE). 163. https://commons.clarku.edu/idce_masters_papers/163 This Research Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Master’s Papers at Clark Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Development, Community and Environment (IDCE) by an authorized administrator of Clark Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Future of Transportation Alternative Fuel Vehicle Policies In China and United States Jiyi Lai DECEMBER 2016 A Masters Paper Submitted to the faculty of Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the department of IDCE And accepted on the recommendation of ! Christopher Van Atten, Chief Instructor ABSTRACT The Future of Transportation Alternative Fuel Vehicle Policies In China and United States Jiyi Lai The number of passenger cars in use worldwide has been steadily increasing. This has led to an increase in greenhouse gas emissions and other air pollutants, and new efforts to develop alternative fuel vehicles to mitigate reliance on petroleum. Alternative fuel vehicles include a wide range of technologies powered by energy sources other than gasoline or diesel fuel.
  • E-Valuation 2014 2016 in Sustainable Assets Sustainable in Investments Worldwide Trillion 25 EUR PHOTOS: Tobias Sagmeister, AUDI AG // SOURCES, COVER: See P

    E-Valuation 2014 2016 in Sustainable Assets Sustainable in Investments Worldwide Trillion 25 EUR PHOTOS: Tobias Sagmeister, AUDI AG // SOURCES, COVER: See P

    2018 Annual Report e-valuation Production of China electric vehicles EUR 25 trillion 6,843,000 and plug-in hybrids through 2021 Worldwide investments (overall market in sustainable assets forecast) 2016 USA 3,058,000 Germany 2014 2,247,000 2012 Audi 2018 Annual Report PHOTOS: Tobias Sagmeister, AUDI AG // SOURCES, COVER: see p. 10, 24, 46, 62 Just meeting expectations – that’s not enough for us. We want to set new standards! For this reason, we are completely re- thinking Audi. We are convinced of the great potential of both our company and our brand. We have learned from past mis- takes: Today Audi stands for a culture of openness and honesty. We place our customers at the center of our actions. We focus on customer-relevant solutions and implement them resolutely. By doing so, we are, for example, creating a new ecosystem for electric cars by developing a worldwide charging network with our partners. Our Roadmap E features the market launch of our first fully electric SUV, the Audi e-tron, followed by a total of a dozen electrified models by 2020, including five with full battery-electric drive. This means we will offer sustainable pre- mium mobility to our customers in all segments. Chairman of the Board of Management of AUDI AG BRAM SCHOT An important pillar of our global business model is China. We already invested in this market 30 years ago as the first premium brand. We are currently deepening our commitment here and, when it comes to our products, focusing even more closely on local development and production.
  • Evaluating Green Fleet Options

    Evaluating Green Fleet Options

    SUSTAINABILITY/CLIMATE CHANGE Evaluating Green Fleet Options Cities and counties throughout California are considering adopting policies and programs to “green” their fleets by purchasing fuel-efficient and alternative-fuel vehicles. While many agencies already have experience in this area, some local officials have questions regarding green fleet options. The Institute for Local Government (ILG) conducted a survey in 2010, Benefits of Green Fleets through its climate change program, that asked local officials what questions they Taking steps to make agency fleets greener has have regarding green fleet options. ILG other benefits in addition to potential fuel and used the survey results to develop cost savings and lessening dependence on information to help local officials foreign oil. Because transportation is the evaluate their options related to green largest generator of greenhouse gas emissions, fleets. The project was funded by AAA reducing fuel use helps to decrease such Northern California, Nevada and Utah. emissions. Defining the Terminology Fuel-efficient vehicles get better than average gas mileage, though they may still run on petroleum-based fuels, such as gasoline and diesel or a combination of petroleum-based fuel and another power source. Alternative-fuel vehicles run on non-petroleum-based power. Some of these alternative fuels are produced domestically, reducing dependence on imported oil, and some are from renewable sources. Alternative fuels typically cost less than petroleum-based fuel and produce less pollution than gasoline or diesel. Flexible-fuel vehicles, another type of alternative-fuel vehicle, can run on gasoline or a gasoline-ethanol blend of up to 85 percent ethanol, also known as E85.
  • SRES Yearbook 2003

    SRES Yearbook 2003

    SCHOOL OF RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENT & SOCIETY SRES Yearbook 2005 instructions YEARBOOK 2006 Do not print this page Please print “Contents” (first) page inside front cover and “ISSN” (last) page inside back cover ANU COLLEGESRES YEARBOOK OF SCIENCE 2 0 0 6 http://sres.anu.edu.auWELCOME CONTENTS Contents inside cover Welcome 1 Essential Information 2 SRES Degree Programs 4 Head of School’s Report 6 SRES Staff 8 SRES Students 10 SRES Community 12 Undergraduate Field Excursions 14 Undergraduate Course Guide 16 Profiles Academic Staff 17 Professorial, Research & Postdoctoral Fellows 32 Visiting Fellows & Adjunct Appointees 36 Support Staff 55 Associated Staff 59 iCAM Staff 60 PhD & MPhil Scholars 71 Masters Scholars 90 Graduate Diploma Scholars 92 Honours Scholars 94 Thesis Abstracts PhD 100 Masters 107 Honours 117 SRES Publications 2005 121 Cover: SRES teaching and research focuses on the relationships between people and the environment: how societies shape and are shaped by the environment, how societies manage and use natural resources, and how people impact on the environment. SRES draws on both the natural and social sciences to address the challenges of sustainability. Photos: Thanks to the many students and staff who contributed photos to this Yearbook. The winner of this years photo competition is Toby Roscoe (front cover). This image is of a rainforest gully in Corymbia maculata forest, taken during SRES course ‘Landscape Ecology’ at Kioloa Coastal Campus. Yearbook Production Team: Debbie Claridge, Clive Hilliker, Sue Holzknecht, Steve Leahy, Zosha Smith, Panit Thamsongsana Printed on Recycled Paper ii CONTENTS SRES YEARBOOK 2 0 0 6 WELCOME The School of Resources, Environment and Society (SRES) at The Australian National University (ANU) is a significant national and international centre for research and learning.
  • Biomethane for Transport in Sweden a Roller-Coaster Ride Through the Past 15 Years Phases of Growth

    Biomethane for Transport in Sweden a Roller-Coaster Ride Through the Past 15 Years Phases of Growth

    Björn Fredriksson Möller 11.04.2018 Biomethane for transport in Sweden A roller-coaster ride through the past 15 years Phases of growth Phase 1: Slow growth – competition with ethanol as greenest fuel for cars, lack of biogas production Phase 2: Fast growth, increasing investments, constraints in production and substrates Phase 3: Stalling growth, uncertainties in support and increasing production. Imports possible. 09.04.2018 2 Investments & plans in different phases 1. Local biogas production Local investment support to projects improving environment – investments in city bus operation using the gas locally 2. Strong growth expected to continue Anaerobic digestion not sufficient to sustain growth – gasification provide similar economy and big volumes – GoBiGas and Bio2G explore possibilities and develop concepts 3. Slowing growth, increasing uncertainty in policy development Smaller investments and organic growth preferred, in combination with the possibility to import fuels – biogas as well as others Policy drivers in different phases - Sweden 1. Adding costs to use of fossil fuels (carbon tax) and setting targets for public transports and fleets A no-brainer to use local waste and residues for local transport needs. Buses, waste collection, car fleets. 2. Continued support to ”green” vehicles – stable policy Alternative solutions (ethanol) get backlash from food or fuel debate. Taxi and company cars increasing, improved technology, etc 3. New ”super-green” vehicle incentive, ”green” to include diesel… Super-green - only electric and plug-in, whereas green now including low-CO 2 diesel vehicles increase competition. Increasing volumes of low-cost drop-in HVO provide easy choice for heavy transport. In addition: Continued hesitation on the role of biofuels on a European level from NGO’s, policy makers and others slows development and investments Future outlook for biomethane in transport 1.
  • Electric Vehicle Charging Station Study Thomas Jefferson Region

    Electric Vehicle Charging Station Study Thomas Jefferson Region

    ABSTRACT This study identifies means to improving supports for the use of electric vehicles for area residents in the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission region— increasing transportation options, reducing fossil fuel emissions, and improving transportation infrastructure. Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission Summer 2021 Electric Vehicle Charging Station Study Thomas Jefferson Region This page intentionally left blank Contents Introduction 1 Background 1 Benefits of EVs 2 Number of EVs in TJPDC 4 Infrastructure Supporting EVs in TJPDC Region 7 EV Charging Locations in the TJPDC Region 7 Types of EV Charging Stations 8 EV Range 12 Commuting and Trip Patterns in TJPDC Region 13 Factors that Affect EV Adoption 16 Recommendations 19 Infrastructure 19 Funding 19 Policy 20 Information Gathering/Sharing 20 Guidance 21 Sample Guidelines for EV Charging Stations 21 Sample Local Ordinances 23 Conclusion 24 Works Cited This page intentionally left blank Electric Vehicle Charging Station Study Thomas Jefferson Region Summer 2021 Introduction Local governments will be the first to respond to community needs precipitated by the effects of climate change and are uniquely posed to take a leadership role in charting a resilient future while reducing the impacts of climate change. In alignment with Virginia’s goal to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 30% in 2030 and reach net zero by 2050, the City of Charlottesville, Albemarle County, and University of Virginia have set emission reduction goals as well. Electric vehicle (EV) use is part of these plans to reduce emissions and mitigate climate change in the Charlottesville Albemarle area. While electric vehicles include hybrid electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles and battery electric vehicles, this study will focus on battery electric vehicles because they are the most reliant on charging infrastructure.
  • A U.S. Consumer's Guide to Electric Vehicle Charging

    A U.S. Consumer's Guide to Electric Vehicle Charging

    CONSUMER GUIDE TO ELECTRIC VEHICLES JUNE 2021 11570437 WHY BUY AN ELECTRIC CAR? Electric vehicles (EVs) are fun to drive, safe, comfortable, and convenient to refuel. They also cost less to operate per mile and produce no tailpipe emissions. Today’s electric cars do everything a gas car can do—and more. Most are high-performing vehicles with silent, instant torque, superb handling, and the latest technology and safety features. Most can travel 200–250 miles on a charge; many can go farther. Most EV drivers prefer to charge at home for its convenience and savings. A growing national network of public charging sites enables more consumers—even those who can’t plug in at home—to consider purchasing an EV. Because EVs are powered by electricity instead of gasoline, they shift our energy reliance to domestic sources while also reducing emissions. Cutting vehicle emissions is especially critical in communities adjacent to heavily trafficked roadways. As local power generation grows cleaner, every electric car charged on that grid gets cleaner too—and the broader public health and climate benefits increase. Electrifying light-duty transport would reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions by 17% relative to 2018 levels. EV 101 This guide highlights the two types of electric vehicles that plug into the grid to recharge their batteries. They are battery-electric (or all-electric) vehicles and plug-in hybrids. All-electric vehicles are powered solely Plug-in hybrids pair an electric motor by an electric motor and battery. They and battery with an internal-combustion burn no gasoline or diesel fuel, so they engine.