DOCSLIB.ORG

Gender Inequality and Screenwriters

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gender Inequality and Screenwriters GENDER INEQUALITY AND SCREENWRITERS A study of the impact of gender on equality of opportunity for screenwriters and key creatives in the UK film and television industries Authored By Alexis Kreager with Stephen Follows Introduction Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Foreword ............................................................................................................................................. 4 About the Commissioners ................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 6 Part One – Film ..................................................................................................................................... 20 1.1 Top-Level Stats ............................................................................................................................ 20 1.1a The Gender of UK Film Writers ............................................................................................. 20 1.1b Representation over Time .................................................................................................... 22 1.2 The Film Industry ........................................................................................................................ 24 1.2a Budgets.................................................................................................................................. 24 1.2b Genres ................................................................................................................................... 26 1.2c The Link between Budget and Genre .................................................................................... 28 1.2d Reviews and Audience .......................................................................................................... 29 1.2e Box Office Revenue ............................................................................................................... 33 1.2f Public Funding ........................................................................................................................ 37 1.3 Other Creatives, Crew and Cast .................................................................................................. 42 1.3a Key Creatives ......................................................................................................................... 42 1.3b Crew ...................................................................................................................................... 43 1.3c The Relation of Department Heads and their Crew .............................................................. 44 1.3d Representation over Time .................................................................................................... 45 1.3e Cast ........................................................................................................................................ 46 Part Two – Television ............................................................................................................................ 48 2.1 Top Level Stats ............................................................................................................................ 48 2.1a Gender of UK Television Writers ........................................................................................... 48 2.1b Representation over time ..................................................................................................... 50 2.2 The Television Industry ............................................................................................................... 51 2.2a Time Slot................................................................................................................................ 51 2.2b Episode Quantity and Continuing Drama Series ................................................................... 54 2.2c Programme Types ................................................................................................................. 57 2.2d Children’s TV ......................................................................................................................... 58 2.3 Broadcasters ............................................................................................................................... 61 2.3a Top Level Findings ................................................................................................................. 61 2.3b By Channel ............................................................................................................................ 63 2.3c Broadcasters in Detail ........................................................................................................... 66 Part Three – Career Progression ........................................................................................................... 69 1 Introduction 3.1 Career Trajectories in Film .......................................................................................................... 69 3.1a Career Progression for Writers ............................................................................................. 69 3.1b Career Progression for Writers by Film Types ...................................................................... 72 3.2 Career Trajectories in Television ................................................................................................. 75 3.2a Career Progression for Writers ............................................................................................. 75 3.2b Career Progression for Writers by Programme Types .......................................................... 78 3.3 The Writer’s Journey ................................................................................................................... 81 3.3a Entering the Industry ............................................................................................................ 83 3.3b Career Development ............................................................................................................. 88 3.3c Advanced Career Progression ............................................................................................... 91 3.3d Summary of Career Progression ........................................................................................... 94 3.4 The difference between Film and Television .............................................................................. 96 3.5 Polling ........................................................................................................................................ 101 Part Four - Analysis and Explanations ................................................................................................. 106 4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 106 4.2 How Writers are Hired .............................................................................................................. 107 4.3 Explanation One: Personal Preference ..................................................................................... 109 4.3a The Empirical Issue .............................................................................................................. 109 4.3b The Perception Problem ..................................................................................................... 111 4.3c The Broader Problem with Inequality ................................................................................. 112 4.4 Explanation Two: Unconscious Bias .......................................................................................... 114 4.4a Understanding Unconscious Bias ........................................................................................ 114 4.4b The Relation of Experience and Bias ................................................................................... 117 4.4c Classification ........................................................................................................................ 118 4.4d Self-Sustaining Inequality .................................................................................................... 119 4.5 Explanation Three: Systemic Issues .......................................................................................... 121 4.5a Limited Effectiveness of Regulatory Systems ..................................................................... 122 4.5b Decision-Making and the Limitations of the Profit Motive ................................................ 123 4.5c How Systemic Issues define decision-making ..................................................................... 126 Part Five - Potential Solutions ............................................................................................................. 127 5.1 The Justification for Further Action .......................................................................................... 127 5.1a The Impact of the Disparity ................................................................................................. 127 5.1b Outline of Requirements ....................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Intergenerational Solidarity and the Needs of Future Generations
    United Nations A/68/x.. General Assembly Distr.: General 5 August 2013 Original: English Word count (including footnotes/endnotes): 8419 Sixty-eighth session Item 19 of the provisional agenda Sustainable Development: Intergenerational solidarity and the needs of future generations Report of the Secretary-General Summary The present report is prepared pursuant to paragraph 86 of the Rio+20 outcome document, which requests the Secretary-General to provide a report on the need for promoting intergenerational solidarity for the achievement of sustainable development, taking into account the needs of future generations. The report evaluates how the need for intergenerational solidarity could be addressed by the United Nations system and analyses how the issue of intergenerational solidarity is embedded in the concept of sustainable development and existing treaties, and declarations, resolutions, and intergovernmental decisions. It also reviews the conceptual A/68/100 A/68/x.. and ethical underpinnings of intergenerational solidarity and future generations and how the issue has been taken into consideration in policy-making at the national level in a variety of institutions. The report outlines options for possible models to institutionalize concern for future generations at the United Nations level, as well as suggesting options for the way forward. 2 A/68/x.. Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction………………………………………… II. Conceptual framework (a) Conceptual and ethical dimensions (b) Economics III. Existing arrangements and lessons learnt (a) Needs of future generations in international legal instruments (b) Legal provisions at the national level (c) National institutions for future generations (d) Children and youth (e) Proposals related to a High Commissioner for Future Generations IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Regional TV Production and Programming Guidance Consultation
    Review of Regional TV Production and Programming Guidance Consultation CONSULTATION: Publication Date: 19 December 2018 Closing Date for Responses: 27 February 2019 Contents Section 1. Overview 1 2. Background 7 3. The changing TV production landscape 14 4. Appraisal of the current regime and the Guidance 29 5. Review proposals 46 Annex A1. Responding to this consultation 65 A2. Ofcom’s consultation principles 68 A3. Consultation coversheet 69 A4. Consultation questions 70 Review of Regional TV Production and Programming Guidance 1. Overview Ofcom is reviewing the Regional Production and Programming Guidance (‘the Guidance’) 1 and associated reporting and compliance regime to ensure that the regulatory framework is effective in a rapidly evolving production landscape. Nations and regions’ production is a crucial part of the UK television production sector, accounting for almost half of public service broadcaster (‘PSB’) qualifying programme hours2 in 2017. TV production outside of London helps to disperse and stimulate investment and job opportunities in the sector, throughout the UK. This has resulted in the employment of a broad range of talent with a diversity of editorial perspectives, to create a wide variety of programmes for the enjoyment of UK viewers. This can also assist in strengthening regional production centres for the long term and supporting broader creative and cultural economies across the UK. To help promote nations and regions’ TV production, Ofcom has imposed quotas on the PSBs3 to ensure that a suitable proportion of their network programmes are made in the UK outside of the M25 (‘regional productions’). The BBC and Channel 3 services also have quotas to broadcast localised programmes, including regional news, across different areas of the UK (‘regional programming’), and a suitable proportion of these should be made in the local area.
    [Show full text]
  • Models for Protecting the Environment for Future Generations
    Models for Protecting the Environment for Future Generations Science and Environmental Health Network The International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School Models for Protecting the Environment for Future Generations Science and Environmental Health Network The International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School October 2008 http://www.sehn.org http://www.law.harvard.edu/programs/hrp The Science & Environmental Health Network (“SEHN”) engages communities and governments in the effective application of science to restore and protect public and ecosystem health. SEHN is a leading proponent of the precautionary principle as a basis for public policy. Our goal is policy reform that promotes just and sustainable communities, for this and future generations. The International Human Rights Clinic (IHRC) at Harvard Law School is a center for critical thought and active engagement in human rights. The IHRC provides students the opportunity to engage directly with the vital issues, insti- tutions and processes of the human rights movement. Each year, the IHRC part- ners with dozens of local and international non-governmental organizations to work on human rights projects ranging from litigation, on-site investigations, legal and policy analysis, report drafting for international oversight bodies, and the development of advocacy strategies. MODELS FOR PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS Table of Contents I. Summary 1 II. Legal Bases for Present Promotion of Future Interests 3 A. The Interests of Future Generations 4 B. Duties to and Rights of Future Generations 6 C. Guardians and Trustees for Future Generations 9 III. Legal Mechanisms and Institutions for Protecting the Environment for Future Generations 11 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Billy Bush Says There Were 8 Witnesses to Trump's 'Access Hollywood'
    The Washington Post Morning Mix Billy Bush says there were 8 witnesses to Trump’s ‘Access Hollywood’ comments By Derek Hawkins December 4 Billy Bush, the former “Access Hollywood” host, has responded to recent reports that President Trump has questioned the authenticity of video in which he can be heard bragging about grabbing women by their genitalia, saying the president was “indulging in some revisionist history.” Bush said that seven people, in addition to him, heard Trump. In a commentary Sunday for the New York Times, Bush said he was disturbed by reports from the past week that Trump has told allies and at least one senator that he may not be the voice on the 2005 “Access Hollywood” tape. “He said it,” Bush wrote, referring to Trump’s now infamous “grab them by the p‑‑‑y” remark made on an “Access Hollywood” bus. “Of course he said it,” Bush added. “And we laughed along, without a single doubt that this was hypothetical hot air from America’s highest-rated bloviator. Along with Donald Trump and me, there were seven other guys present on the bus at the time, and every single one of us assumed we were listening to a crass standup act. He was performing. Surely we thought, none of this was real.” “We now know better,” he added, referring to the women who came forward to accuse Trump of improper sexual advances. The Washington Post first reported the leaked recording in October 2016. It captured audio of then-candidate Trump boasting to Bush about forcibly kissing, groping and trying to have sex with women as the two rode to a soap opera set to shoot a segment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Filmmakers' Guide to Distribution and Exhibition
    A Filmmakers’ Guide to Distribution and Exhibition A Filmmakers’ Guide to Distribution and Exhibition Written by Jane Giles ABOUT THIS GUIDE 2 Jane Giles is a film programmer and writer INTRODUCTION 3 Edited by Pippa Eldridge and Julia Voss SALES AGENTS 10 Exhibition Development Unit, bfi FESTIVALS 13 THEATRIC RELEASING: SHORTS 18 We would like to thank the following people for their THEATRIC RELEASING: FEATURES 27 contribution to this guide: PLANNING A CINEMA RELEASE 32 NON-THEATRIC RELEASING 40 Newton Aduaka, Karen Alexander/bfi, Clare Binns/Zoo VIDEO Cinemas, Marc Boothe/Nubian Tales, Paul Brett/bfi, 42 Stephen Brown/Steam, Pamela Casey/Atom Films, Chris TELEVISION 44 Chandler/Film Council, Ben Cook/Lux Distribution, INTERNET 47 Emma Davie, Douglas Davis/Atom Films, CASE STUDIES 52 Jim Dempster/bfi, Catharine Des Forges/bfi, Alnoor GLOSSARY 60 Dewshi, Simon Duffy/bfi, Gavin Emerson, Alexandra FESTIVAL & EVENTS CALENDAR 62 Finlay/Channel 4, John Flahive/bfi, Nicki Foster/ CONTACTS 64 McDonald & Rutter, Satwant Gill/British Council, INDEX 76 Gwydion Griffiths/S4C, Liz Harkman/Film Council, Tony Jones/City Screen, Tinge Krishnan/Disruptive Element Films, Luned Moredis/Sgrîn, Méabh O’Donovan/Short CONTENTS Circuit, Kate Ogborn, Nicola Pierson/Edinburgh BOXED INFORMATION: HOW TO APPROACH THE INDUSTRY 4 International Film Festival, Lisa Marie Russo, Erich BEST ADVICE FROM INDUSTRY PROFESSIONALS 5 Sargeant/bfi, Cary Sawney/bfi, Rita Smith, Heather MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS 5 Stewart/bfi, John Stewart/Oil Factory, Gary DEALS & CONTRACTS 8 Thomas/Arts Council of England, Peter Todd/bfi, Zoë SHORT FILM BUREAU 11 Walton, Laurel Warbrick-Keay/bfi, Sheila Whitaker/ LONDON & EDINBURGH 16 article27, Christine Whitehouse/bfi BLACK & ASIAN FILMS 17 SHORT CIRCUIT 19 Z00 CINEMAS 20 The editors have made every endeavour to ensure the BRITISH BOARD OF FILM CLASSIFICATION 21 information in this guide is correct at the time of GOOD FILMS GOOD PROGRAMMING 22 going to press.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Sustainable Development and Children's Rights
    social sciences $€ £ ¥ Article Integrating Sustainable Development and Children’s Rights: A Case Study on Wales Rhian Croke 1,*, Helen Dale 2 , Ally Dunhill 3, Arwyn Roberts 2 , Malvika Unnithan 4 and Jane Williams 5 1 Hillary Rodham Clinton School of Law, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK 2 Lleisiau Bach/Little Voices, National Lottery People and Places Fund 2012-2020, Swansea and Bangor University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK; [email protected] (H.D.); [email protected] (A.R.) 3 Independent Consultant and Researcher, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 8TA, UK; [email protected] 4 Northumbria University Law School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8ST, UK; [email protected] 5 Observatory on the Human Rights of Children, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] Abstract: The global disconnect between the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the Conven- tion on the Rights of the Child (CRC), has been described as ‘a missed opportunity’. Since devolution, the Welsh Government has actively pursued a ‘sustainable development’ and a ‘children’s rights’ agenda. However, until recently, these separate agendas also did not contribute to each other, al- though they culminated in two radical and innovative pieces of legislation; the Rights of Children and Young Persons (Wales) Measure (2013) and the Well-being and Future Generations (Wales) Act (2015). This article offers a case study that draws upon the SDGs and the CRC and considers how recent Citation: Croke, Rhian, Helen Dale, Ally Dunhill, Arwyn Roberts, guidance to Welsh public bodies for implementation attempts to contribute to a more integrated Malvika Unnithan, and Jane Williams.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future Generations Report 2020
    The Future Generations Report 2020 Let's create the future together Chapter 3 Progress against the well-being goals Future Generations Report 2020 www.futuregenerations.wales Future Generations Report 2020 Progress against the well-being goals: A Prosperous Wales The Vision – A Prosperous Wales in 2050 05 People’s perception of progress towards this goal 08 Challenges and opportunities for change 10 Ensure people can secure decent, fair work 1 0 Transition urgently to a low carbon society 14 which works within its environmental limits Ensure we use natural resources efficiently, 23 recognising the limits of the global environment Skills fit for the future Procure goods and services in ways that 24 support economic, social, environmental and 25 cultural well-being Support inclusive local economies 25 Recommendations 29 Resources 34 Future Generations Report 2020 www.futuregenerations.wales A Prosperous Wales Our economic system is broken. We have Underpinning these issues is the way our seen widening economic inequalities, current economic model prioritises profit especially as the very rich get richer, along over the well-being of people and planet. with increasing levels of insecurity, homelessness, in-work poverty, mental health The aspirations of the Well-being of Future conditions and loneliness. As trust in Generations Act aim to redefine our institutions declines, people turn inwards or approach to the economy. In the Act, this against each other; deepening divisions goal is defined as: within our society. An innovative, productive and low carbon society which recognises the limits of the Our planet is also on the brink of the sixth global environment and therefore uses mass extinction, as catastrophic climate and resources efficiently and proportionately ecological breakdown get closer and closer.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In re Petition of ) ) Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, ) on behalf of its subsidiaries and affiliates ) ) CSR-8625-A ) Docket 12-114 For Modification of the Television Market of ) Station WFBD, Destin, Florida ) (Facility 10 81669) ) ) To: Chief, Media Bureau ) Opposition to Petition for Special Relief George S. Flinn, Jr. (hereinafter "Flinn"), by his attorney, hereby respectfully submits his Opposition to the "Petition for Special Relief' (hereinafter "Opposition") filed by Comcast Cable Communications, LLC (hereinafter "Comcast") in the above- referenced proceeding. In support thereof, the following is shown: A. Background Flinn is the licensee of WFBD, a full power commercial television broadcast station licensed to Destin, Florida. WFBD has been on the air for less than seven years (i.e., the station commenced operation on September 5,2005). On September 19, 2011, Flinn served timely notice on Comcast that WFBD was electing mandatory carriage on Com cast's cable system(s) serving the Mobile, AL- Pensacola (Ft. Walton Beach), FL DMA for the three year election cycle beginning January 1, 2012 and ending December 31,2014. Comcast failed to either (a) implement carriage of WFBD or (b) respond to Flinn's September 19,2011 carriage request. As such, on February 9,2012, Flinn forwarded another detailed letter to Comcast delineating why carriage of WFBD was appropriate. In addition, Flinn's February 9, 2012 letter stated: As noted in Flinn's initial September 19, 2011 carriage election notice to Comcast, [p]lease be advised that in the event you are unable to receive a good quality WFBD signal (as defined by the FCC's rules) at all of your principal headends in the DMA, WFBD agrees to be responsible for the costs of delivering to those systems a good quality signal via alternative means pursuant to 47 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • National Prevention Strategy AMERICA’S PLAN for BETTER HEALTH and WELLNESS
    National Prevention Strategy AMERICA’S PLAN FOR BETTER HEALTH AND WELLNESS June 2011 National Prevention, Health Promotion and Public Health Council For more information about the National Prevention Strategy, go to: http://www.healthcare.gov/center/councils/nphpphc. OFFICE of the SURGEON GENERAL 5600 Fishers Lane Room 18-66 Rockville, MD 20857 email: [email protected] Suggested citation: National Prevention Council, National Prevention Strategy, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General, 2011. National Prevention Strategy America’s Plan for Better Health and Wellness June 16, 2011 2 National Prevention Message from the Chair of the National Prevention,Strategy Health Promotion, and Public Health Council As U.S. Surgeon General and Chair of the National Prevention, Health Promotion, and Public Health Council (National Prevention Council), I am honored to present the nation’s first ever National Prevention and Health Promotion Strategy (National Prevention Strategy). This strategy is a critical component of the Affordable Care Act, and it provides an opportunity for us to become a more healthy and fit nation. The National Prevention Council comprises 17 heads of departments, agencies, and offices across the Federal government who are committed to promoting prevention and wellness. The Council provides the leadership necessary to engage not only the federal government but a diverse array of stakeholders, from state and local policy makers, to business leaders, to individuals, their families and communities, to champion the policies and programs needed to ensure the health of Americans prospers. With guidance from the public and the Advisory Group on Prevention, Health Promotion, and Integrative and Public Health, the National Prevention Council developed this Strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Film Council Group and Lottery Annual Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31 March 2011
    UK Film Council Group and Lottery Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 31 March 2011 HC 1391 SG/2011/142 £20.75 UK Film Council Group and Lottery Annual Report and Financial Statements for the year ended 31 March 2011 Presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 34(3) and 35(5) of the National Lottery etc. Act 1993 (as amended by the National Lottery Act 1998 and the National Lottery Act 2006) ORDERED BY THE HOUSE OF COMMONS TO BE PRINTED 14 JULY 2011 Presented to the Scottish Parliament pursuant to the Scotland Act 1998 Section 88 Company no: 3815052 London: The Stationery Office HC 1391 SG/2011/142 14 July 2011 £20.75 1 © UK Film Council (2011) The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental and agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context The material must be acknowledged as UK Film Councilcopyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. This publication is also for download at www.official-documents.gov.uk This document is also available from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport’s website at: http://www.transparency.culture.gov.uk/arms-length-bodies/ ISBN: 9780102974485 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID: 2441293 07/11 13762 19585 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre
    [Show full text]
  • Meredith Corp
    MEREDITH CORP FORM 8-K (Unscheduled Material Events) Filed 7/20/1998 For Period Ending 6/29/1998 Address 1716 LOCUST ST DES MOINES, Iowa 50309 Telephone 515-284-3000 CIK 0000065011 Industry Printing & Publishing Sector Services Fiscal Year 06/30 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D. C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) June 29, 1998 Meredith Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Iowa 1-5128 42-0410230 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (I.R.S. Employer of incorporation) File Number) Identification No.) 1716 Locust Street, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-3023 (Address of principal executive offices) (ZIP Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code 515 - 284-3000 - 1 - Item 5. Other Events On June 29, 1998, Meredith Corporation announced in a press release, attached hereto as Exhibit 99, that it had agreed to sell the net assets of the Better Homes and Gardens Real Estate Service to GMAC Home Services, Inc., a subsidiary of GMAC Financial Services. The transaction is expected to be completed within 90 days. Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits. (c) Exhibits 99 Press release dated June 29, 1998 issued by Meredith Corporation. SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. MEREDITH CORPORATION Registrant (Stephen M. Lacy) Stephen M. Lacy Vice President - Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) Date: July 20, 1998 - 2 - Exhibit Index Exhibit # 99 Press release dated June 29, 1998 issued by Meredith Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015/2016 WGSA Council V
    2015/2016 WGSA Council v Chairperson - Theoline Maphutha THEOLINE MAPHUTHA CHAIRPERSON Theoline Maphutha is a self-employed writer with over five years’ experience in the film and television industry. Before pursuing a career as a writer, she studied and worked in the information and communications technology (ICT) industry for almost 10 years as a support administrator, systems implementer, and project manager. Although skilled in lifestyle/magazine program writing, she’s a published poet, lyricist, and blogger, passionate about kaizen, constant self-improvement. Contribution is one of her highest values (ever since she was a Brownie in the girl scouts). Her life’s goal is to empower people to follow their purpose using the knowledge, experience, and resources available to her. Theoline is an independent soul with nimble flexibility, and a deliberate, succinct style of communication, who delivers autonomously creative ideas and solutions. Vice Chair - Peter Goldsmid PETER GOLDSMID LEGAL SERVICES Writer-director-producer Peter Goldsmid has a background in legal philosophy and politics and a keen interest in the interface between morality, justice, crime, social issues – and drama. This would his final year on Council where, if elected, he would continue to giving advice to writers in their dealings with producers. This includes advising on legal issues (such as contracts), helping writers access professional legal help if necessary, and mediating in disputes. Having worked both as producer and writer for hire, he has a balanced perspective on the issues that affect writers and brings this to bear in his contributions to Council. He is currently nominated for a 2015 writing SAFTA (as part of the “Traffic” writing team) and a Muse Award for documentary writing on Dance up from the street.
    [Show full text]