Nova Scotia, and First Nations and Inuit Health Branch of Health Canada 1997-1998 to 2003-2004

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nova Scotia, and First Nations and Inuit Health Branch of Health Canada 1997-1998 to 2003-2004 Patented Conseil d’examen Medicine Prices du prix des médicaments Review Board brevetés npduis Pharmaceutical Trends Overview Report Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and First Nations and Inuit Health Branch of Health Canada 1997-1998 to 2003-2004 National Prescription Drug npduis Utilization Information System Analytical Study Series June 2006 Ce document est également disponible en français sous le titre “Rapport sommaire sur les tendances des prix des médicaments” For a print copy of this report, please contact: The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board Standard Life Centre Box L40 333 Laurier Avenue West Suite 1400 Ottawa, Ontario K1P 1C1 Tel.: 1-877-861-2350 (613) 952-7360 Fax: (613) 952-7626 TTY: (613) 957-4373 E-mail: [email protected] This publication is also available on the PMPRB Web site at: http://www.pmprb-cepmb.gc.ca Pharmaceutical Trends Overview Report ISBN: 0-662-49065-7 Cat. no.: H81-1/2-2006 Acknowledgements The Pharmaceutical Trends Overview Report was prepared by the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board (PMPRB) under the provisions and conditions of the National Prescription Drug Utilization Information System. This report was produced with the assistance of the NPDUIS Steering Committee. The contribution of individual members of the Steering Committee was invaluable. The NPDUIS Steering Committee members of this report are: Kevin Wilson Marilyn Thornton NPDUIS Steering Committee Chair Assistant Director and Executive Director Pharmaceutical Policy and Programs Branch Drug Plan and Extended Benefits Branch Alberta Health and Wellness Saskatchewan Health Brett Wilmer Colleen Janes Senior Economist Director Policy and Program Analysis Pharmaceutical Services British Columbia Ministry of Health Services Newfoundland and Labrador Department of Health and Community Services Dianne Tait Manager Patrick Crawford Extended Benefits and Pharmaceutical Pharmacy Services Consultant Program Acute and Continuing Care Yukon Health Services Prince Edward Island Health and Social Services Georges Nadon Pharmaceutical Consultant John Hoar Benefits Management Pharmaceutical Economist First Nations Non-Insured Health Benefits Pharmaceutical Services Nova Scotia Department of Health Wayne Lepine Manager James Ayles Pharmaceutical Policy Health Information Consultant Quality Care, Technology and Pharmaceuticals Medicare / Prescription Drug Program Division New Brunswick Health and Wellness Health Canada Brent Fraser Michael Hunt A/Associate Director Manager, Pharmaceuticals Pharmaceutical Services Coordination Unit Canadian Institute for Health Information Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care Paul De Civita A / Director Deborah Malazdrewicz Policy & Economic Analysis Branch Manager Patented Medicine Prices Review Board Health Information Management, Finance Division Manitoba Health The PMPRB appreciates the staff contribution of the members of the NPDUIS Steering Committee. As well, the PMPRB recognizes the extensive work effort that was put into this report by the PMPRB research team of the Policy and Economic Analysis Branch, Informatics Branch, the editors, desktop publishing unit, and translators. Pharmaceutical Trends Overview Report i Table of Contents Executive Summary . .2 1 – Introduction . .10 1.1 – Background . .10 2 – Overview of Report . .11 3 – Health and Drug Expenditures in Canada . .12 3.1 – Overview . .12 3.2 – Public Sector Spending on Drugs . .16 4 – Public Drug Plan Expenditures . .18 4.1 – Growth of Drug Expenditures . .18 4.2 – Benchmark Comparisons of Drug Expenditures . .19 4.3 – Eligible Beneficiary and Claimant Analysis . .20 5 – Drug Costs and Prescription Transactions . .22 5.1 – Percentage Increases in Drug Costs . .22 5.2 – Drug Costs by Market Segment Analysis . .23 5.3 – Drug Costs by Top Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification . .24 5.4 – Drug Costs by Top Individual drugs . .26 5.5 – Prescription Transactions by Top Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification . .27 6 – Price and Quantity Analysis . .29 6.1 – Price and Quantity Indices . .29 6.2 – Distribution Analysis . .32 7 – Defined Daily Dose Analysis . .34 7.1 – Drugs for Acid-Related Disorders . .35 7.2 – Serum Lipid Reducing Agents . .36 7.3 – Psychoanaleptics . .37 7.4 – Agents acting on Renin-Angiotensin System . .38 7.5 – Number of DDDs per Day per 1,000 Claimants – NIHB Drug Plan . .39 Results by Jurisdiction . .40 ALBERTA . .40 SASKATCHEWAN . .50 MANITOBA . .60 ii Pharmaceutical Trends Overview Report ONTARIO . .71 NEW BRUNSWICK . .82 NOVA SCOTIA . .93 NON-INSURED HEALTH BENEFITS . .104 Appendix 1 . .114 1 – Concepts, Definitions, and Methodologies . .114 1.1 – Categorical Structure of Analysis . .114 1.1.1 – Segmentation of Pharmaceutical Market . .114 1.1.2 – Therapeutic Classification . .116 1.1.3 – Defined Daily Doses . .116 1.1.4 – Prescription Transactions . .116 1.1.5 – Individual Drug or Ingredient Level . .117 1.1.6 – Unit of Analysis: . .117 1.1.7 – Types of Drug Expenditures . .117 1.2 – Ranking of Top ATC Groups and Individual Drugs . .118 1.3 – Price and Quantity Analysis . .118 1.3.1 – Price and Quantity Indices . .118 1.3.2 – Distribution of Price Change and Price Ratios . .119 1.4 – Decomposition using Defined Daily Dose (DDD) . .119 Appendix 2 – Data Sources and Limitations . .121 2.1 – Data Sources . .121 2.2 – Data Limitations . .122 Appendix 3 – Population . .124 Appendix 4 – Number of Eligible Beneficiaries and Claimants . .128 Appendix 5 – Provincial and National Gross Domestic Products . .129 Appendix 6 – Provincial and Territorial Budgets . .130 Appendix 7 – Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification . .131 Appendix 8 – Glossary . .133 Appendix 9 – Summary Description of Provincial and Territorial Drug Plans . .136 Pharmaceutical Trends Overview Report 1 Executive Summary Background Drugs are an essential component of the health care system and an integral aspect of the health status of Canadians. In Canada, pharmaceutical sales are forecasted to have reached $21.8 billion in 2004, accounting for 16.7% of health expenditures. Drug expen- ditures have increased at a faster rate than total health expenditures, making it the second largest component, following hospital expenditures. As a source of funding, an increasing share of drug expenditures is being carried by the public system; the public share of drug expenditures increased from 31.6% in 1997 to 37.3% in 2002. For 2004, the public share of drug expenditures is expected to have increased further to 39.0%.1,2 There is a great need to better understand why drug expenditures are increasing; thereby enabling decision makers to allocate limited resources more efficiently and to better plan and provide services. The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board previously produced “Cost Driver” reports that examined trends in pharmaceutical expenditures up to the fiscal year 1999-2000, using data from five provincial drug plans. The Pharmaceutical Trends Overview Report (PTOR) examines spending on drugs utilizing the data from seven public drug plans that include six provinces and the Non-Insured Health Benefits (NIHB) drug program of the First Nations and Inuit Health Branch of Health Canada. The six participating provinces are Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. Seven years of data, 1997-1998 to 2003-2004, were submitted for all jurisdictions with the exception of Manitoba and NIHB drug program which submitted four and five years of data respec- tively. While recognizing that public drug plans differ in their coverage, beneficiaries, types of benefits and adjudication processes, this study provides analysis across all of the jurisdictions’ drug plans for which data were submitted. 1 Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), Drug Expenditure in Canada, 1985 to 2004. 2 Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI), National Health Expenditure Trends, 1975 to 2004 2 Pharmaceutical Trends Overview Report This research has been carried out as part of the National Prescription Drug Utilization Information System (NPDUIS), whose purpose is to provide Canada’s health system with comprehensive information on the utilization and costs associated with pharmaceuticals. Highlights • Drug costs increased in all jurisdictions, ranging from 32.0% in Nova Scotia to 66.6% in Manitoba over the 2000-2001 to 2003-2004. • More than 75% of drug costs were spent on Brand Name drugs whose expenditures grew faster than Generic drugs in most jurisdictions. • Across all jurisdictions, significant contributors to the growth in expenditures included the following therapeutic groups: - Drugs for acid-related disorders, i.e. proton pump inhibitors - Serum lipid reducing agents, i.e. “statin” group of drugs - Psychoanaleptics i.e. antidepressants and anti-dementia drugs - Agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system i.e. ACE inhibitors • Individual drugs, such as Lipitor (“statin” drug) and Altace (ACE-inhibitor drug), contributed anywhere from 2.3% to 13.3% to the increase in expenditures. • The growth in expenditures was largely affected by increases in utilization – not price inflation. • The effect of “switching” from lower-priced.
Recommended publications
  • The Role for Pre-Polymerized Sucralfate In
    ISSN: 2692-5400 DOI: 10.33552/AJGH.2020.02.000531 Academic Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology Review Article Copyright © All rights are reserved by Ricky Wayne McCullough The Role for Pre-Polymerized Sucralfate in Management of Erosive and Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease – High Potency Sucralfate-Mucin Barrier for Enteric Cytoprotection Ricky Wayne McCullough1,2* 1Translational Medicine Clinic and Research Center, USA 2Department of Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Warren Alpert Brown University School of Medicine, USA *Corresponding author: Ricky Wayne McCullough, Translational Medicine Clinic and Received Date: April 13, 2020 Research Center, Storrs Connecticut, USA. Published Date: April 22, 2020 Abstract Pre-polymerized sucralfate, sometimes called high potency sucralfate or polymerized cross-linked sucralfate is a new sucralfate formulation recognizedClinical by outcomes the US FDAfrom in standard 2005. Positive sucralfate clinical do not data justify from a threerole in randomized the management controlled of erosive trials and using non-erosive pre-polymerized gastroesophageal sucralfate refluxfor GERD disease. and each of which cause classic mucosal reactions in the esophageal epithelium. These reactions are symptomatic but may or may not involve erosions. NERD was first reported in 2014 AGA’s Digestive Disease Week (DDW). Gastric refluxate contains protonic acid, dissolved bile acids and proteases Pre-polymerizedBeing non-systemic, sucralfate the utilizes entire biophysical clinical effect means of toany exclude sucralfate all three rests irritants in the fromsurface epithelial concentration mucosa. of sucralfate achieved. Pre-polymerized sucralfate, presented in 2014 DDW, and discussed here, achieves a surface concentration that is 800% greater than standard sucralfate on normal mucosal lining and 2,400% greater on inflamed or acid-injured mucosa, making it most certainly, a high potency sucralfate.
    [Show full text]
  • Lansoprazole Delayed-Release Orally Disintegrating Tablets PI
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION • Patients receiving rilpivirine-containing products. (4, 7) Dual Therapy: Lansoprazole delayed-release orally disintegrating tablets/amoxicillin Administration with Water in an Oral Syringe 6.1 Clinical Trials Experience In clinical trials using combination therapy with lansoprazole plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin, women. Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, this 8.6 Hepatic Impairment These highlights do not include all the information WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS Lansoprazole delayed-release orally disintegrating tablets in combination with amoxicillin as dual 1. Place a 15 mg tablet in oral syringe and draw up 4 mL of water, or place a 30 mg tablet Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates and lansoprazole plus amoxicillin, no increased laboratory abnormalities particular to these drug drug should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed [see Nonclinical Toxicology (13.2)]. In patients with various degrees of chronic hepatic impairment the exposure to lansoprazole was needed to use LANSOPRAZOLE DELAYED- • Gastric Malignancy: In adults, symptomatic therapy is indicated in adults for the treatment of patients with H. pylori infection and duodenal in oral syringe and draw up 10 mL of water. observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of combinations were observed. See full prescribing information for clarithromycin before using in pregnant women. increased compared to healthy subjects with normal hepatic function [see Clinical Pharmacology RELEASE ORALLY DISINTEGRATING TABLETS response with lansoprazole does not preclude ulcer disease (active or one year history of a duodenal ulcer) who are either allergic or intolerant 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Does Your Patient Have Bile Acid Malabsorption?
    NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #198 NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #198 Carol Rees Parrish, MS, RDN, Series Editor Does Your Patient Have Bile Acid Malabsorption? John K. DiBaise Bile acid malabsorption is a common but underrecognized cause of chronic watery diarrhea, resulting in an incorrect diagnosis in many patients and interfering and delaying proper treatment. In this review, the synthesis, enterohepatic circulation, and function of bile acids are briefly reviewed followed by a discussion of bile acid malabsorption. Diagnostic and treatment options are also provided. INTRODUCTION n 1967, diarrhea caused by bile acids was We will first describe bile acid synthesis and first recognized and described as cholerhetic enterohepatic circulation, followed by a discussion (‘promoting bile secretion by the liver’) of disorders causing bile acid malabsorption I 1 enteropathy. Despite more than 50 years since (BAM) including their diagnosis and treatment. the initial report, bile acid diarrhea remains an underrecognized and underappreciated cause of Bile Acid Synthesis chronic diarrhea. One report found that only 6% Bile acids are produced in the liver as end products of of British gastroenterologists investigate for bile cholesterol metabolism. Bile acid synthesis occurs acid malabsorption (BAM) as part of the first-line by two pathways: the classical (neutral) pathway testing in patients with chronic diarrhea, while 61% via microsomal cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase consider the diagnosis only in selected patients (CYP7A1), or the alternative (acidic) pathway via or not at all.2 As a consequence, many patients mitochondrial sterol 27-hydroxylase (CYP27A1). are diagnosed with other causes of diarrhea or The classical pathway, which is responsible for are considered to have irritable bowel syndrome 90-95% of bile acid synthesis in humans, begins (IBS) or functional diarrhea by exclusion, thereby with 7α-hydroxylation of cholesterol catalyzed interfering with and delaying proper treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • Carafate, Tablet
    NEW ZEALAND DATA SHEET CARAFATE 1. Product Name Carafate, 1 g, tablet. 2. Qualitative and Quantitative Composition Each tablet contains 1 g sucralfate For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. Pharmaceutical Form Carafate is a white, uncoated capsule-shaped tablet. One side is plain, the other embossed with the word ‘CARAFATE’. Dimensions: 20 mm x 9 mm x 7mm 4. Clinical Particulars 4.1 Therapeutic indications Treatment of acute, non-malignant gastric ulcer and duodenal ulcer. Maintenance therapy to prevent the recurrence of duodenal ulcers. 4.2 Dose and method of administration Acute ulcerous conditions The recommended adult dose of Carafate for duodenal ulcer and gastric ulcer is 1 g tablet three times a day, one hour before meals and one 1 g tablet at bedtime or two 1 g tablets twice daily taken before breakfast and at bedtime (for up to 8 weeks). For relief of pain, antacids may be added to the treatment. However, they should not be taken within two hours before or after sucralfate intake. In duodenal ulcer, while healing with sucralfate often occurs within two to four weeks, treatment should be continued for up to 8 weeks unless healing has been demonstrated by x-ray and/or endoscopic examination. In the case of gastric ulcers an alternative treatment should be considered if no objective improvement is observed following 6 weeks of sucralfate therapy. Large gastric ulcers that show a progressive healing tendency may require the full 8 weeks of therapy. Maintenance treatment To reduce the risk of recurrence of duodenal ulcers, the recommended dose is one 1 g tablet before breakfast and one at bedtime (for up to 12 months).
    [Show full text]
  • Patient Instructions for Colonoscopy and Upper GI Endoscopy
    GASTROENTEROLOGY Patient Instructions for Colonoscopy and Upper GI Endoscopy This handout will help you get ready for your procedures. It has information about: Where to go for your procedures What are the procedures and why are they done Preparing ahead of time for your procedures Bowel preparation instructions Medication and diet instructions before your procedures What to expect during your procedures WHERE TO GO FOR YOUR COLONOSCOPY/UPPER ENDOSCOPY UVM Medical Center 111 Colchester Ave Endoscopy Outpatient Clinic West Pavilion, Level 4 Burlington, VT 05401 Check in at registration first: Level 3, Main Lobby WHAT IS A COLONOSCOPY? A colonoscopy is an examination of the colon (large intestine) using a specialized video camera called an endoscope. This instrument is inserted into the rectum and advanced up into your large intestine until it meets the small intestine. It shows images of the lining of the large intestine. Tissue samples (biopsies) may be taken during the test. This test can help diagnose and potentially treat: Early signs of cancer in the colon and rectum, specifically remove these abnormal growths called polyps Causes of unexplained changes in bowel habits Causes of inflamed tissue, abnormal growths, ulcers and bleeding WHAT IS AN UPPER ENDOSCOPY? Also known as: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy; EGD, Gastroscopy. An upper GI endoscopy is an examination of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract using a specialized video camera called an endoscope. This instrument is inserted down the throat and shows images of the lining
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Application Publication ( 10 ) Pub . No . : US 2019 / 0192440 A1
    US 20190192440A1 (19 ) United States (12 ) Patent Application Publication ( 10) Pub . No. : US 2019 /0192440 A1 LI (43 ) Pub . Date : Jun . 27 , 2019 ( 54 ) ORAL DRUG DOSAGE FORM COMPRISING Publication Classification DRUG IN THE FORM OF NANOPARTICLES (51 ) Int . CI. A61K 9 / 20 (2006 .01 ) ( 71 ) Applicant: Triastek , Inc. , Nanjing ( CN ) A61K 9 /00 ( 2006 . 01) A61K 31/ 192 ( 2006 .01 ) (72 ) Inventor : Xiaoling LI , Dublin , CA (US ) A61K 9 / 24 ( 2006 .01 ) ( 52 ) U . S . CI. ( 21 ) Appl. No. : 16 /289 ,499 CPC . .. .. A61K 9 /2031 (2013 . 01 ) ; A61K 9 /0065 ( 22 ) Filed : Feb . 28 , 2019 (2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 / 209 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 9 /2027 ( 2013 .01 ) ; A61K 31/ 192 ( 2013. 01 ) ; Related U . S . Application Data A61K 9 /2072 ( 2013 .01 ) (63 ) Continuation of application No. 16 /028 ,305 , filed on Jul. 5 , 2018 , now Pat . No . 10 , 258 ,575 , which is a (57 ) ABSTRACT continuation of application No . 15 / 173 ,596 , filed on The present disclosure provides a stable solid pharmaceuti Jun . 3 , 2016 . cal dosage form for oral administration . The dosage form (60 ) Provisional application No . 62 /313 ,092 , filed on Mar. includes a substrate that forms at least one compartment and 24 , 2016 , provisional application No . 62 / 296 , 087 , a drug content loaded into the compartment. The dosage filed on Feb . 17 , 2016 , provisional application No . form is so designed that the active pharmaceutical ingredient 62 / 170, 645 , filed on Jun . 3 , 2015 . of the drug content is released in a controlled manner. Patent Application Publication Jun . 27 , 2019 Sheet 1 of 20 US 2019 /0192440 A1 FIG .
    [Show full text]
  • Mini-Reviews and Perspectives
    Mini-Reviews and Perspectives Persistent Reflux Symptoms in the Proton Pump Inhibitor Era: The Changing Face of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease EVAN S. DELLON and NICHOLAS J. SHAHEEN Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing and Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina iven the widespread use of potent acid suppressive Despite the common nature of incomplete control of Gtherapies and primary caregivers’ increasing com- GERD symptoms on PPI therapy, a universal definition fort with prescribing these medications at high doses, the for “PPI-refractory GERD” is lacking. Is a subject PPI patient population presenting to gastroenterologists for refractory after incomplete control at once daily dosing? symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has Should twice daily (BID) or other regimens be required changed. Whereas previous consultation often revolved before a subject is considered refractory? Previous work around the control of erosive disease and other mucosal demonstrates that a substantial number of subjects (as manifestations of GERD, and terminated with the prescrip- high as 32%) on daily PPI continue to demonstrate ab- tion of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy, gastroenter- normal distal esophageal acid exposures, and that this ologists often now only enter the scene after failure of PPI proportion can be lowered to single digits by increasing therapy, for symptoms either resistant or only partially standard therapy to BID PPI.6,7 However, US Food and responsive to these medications. Because of the high pro- Drug Administration-approved dosing of these medica- portion of subjects with esophagitis who are healed with tions does not extend to BID therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutical Appendix to the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Basic Revision 3 (2021) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States Basic Revision 3 (2021) Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names INN which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service CAS registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known.
    [Show full text]
  • Pediatric REVIEW
    DIVISION OF GASTROENTEROLOGY PRODUCTS MEDICAL OFFICER REVIEW Application Type: NDA Submission Number: 20-406/067 21-281/024 21-428/017 Letter Date: 04-25-08 Stamp Date: 04-28-08 PDUFA Goal Date: 10-28-08 Reviewer Name: Ali Niak, M.D. Reviewer Completion Date: 10-27-08 Established Name: Lansoprazole (Proposed) Trade Name: Prevacid Pediatric Suspension Therapeutic Class: Proton Pump Inhibitor Applicant: TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. Priority Designation: Standard Formulation: Oral Suspension Dosing Regimen: 0.2-0.3 mg/kg/day for infants ≤ 10 weeks of age or 1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day > 10 weeks of age Indication: treatment of symptomatic GERD patients Intended Population: Pediatric patients, > 28 days since birth (preterm infants with corrected age of at least 44 weeks) but < 12 months of age at Dosing Day 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. RECOMMENDATIONS/RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS ……………………..5 1.1 Recommendation on Regulatory Action ……………………...………….5 1.2 Risk Benefit Analysis …………………………………………………….5 1.3 Recommendations for Postmarketing Risk Management Activities ……..5 1.4 Recommendations for other Postmarketing Study Commitments ………..5 2. INTRODUCTION AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND ………………...5 2.1 Product Information ………………………………………………………7 2.2 Currently Available Treatment for Indication ……………………………8 2.3 Availability of Proposed Active Ingredient in the United States …………8 2.4 Important Issues With Consideration to Related Drugs ………………….9 2.5 Summary of Presubmission Regulatory Activity Related to this Submission ……………………………………………………………….9 2.6 Other Relevant Background Information …………………………….....10 3. ETHICS AND GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICES …………………………...11 3.1 Submission Quality and Integrity ………………………………….……11 3.2 Compliance with Good Practices ………………………………………..11 3.3 Financial Disclosures ……………………………………………………11 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Esomeprazole, NDA 22-101
    CLINICAL REVIEW DIVISION OF GASTROENTEROLOGY PRODUCTS Application Type NDA Submission Number 22-101/000 Letter Date Sept. 27, 2006 Stamp Date Sept. 29, 2006 PDUFA Goal Date July 29, 2007 Reviewer Name Wen-Yi Gao, M.D., Ph.D. Review Completion Date July 19, 2007 Established Name Esomeprazole magnesium (Proposed) Trade Name Nexium Therapeutic Class Proton Pump Inhibitor Applicant AstraZeneca Priority Designation S Formulation Delayed-Release Granules for Oral Suspension Dosing Regimen 10 mg once daily for up to 8 weeks Indication Short-term treatment of symptomatic GERD and erosive esophagitis Intended Population 1 to 11 years of age Clinical Review Wen-Yi Gao, M.D., Ph.D. NDA 22-101/000 Nexium (esomeprazole) Table of Contents CLINICAL REVIEW..................................................................................................................................................1 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................................................5 1.1 RECOMMENDATION ON REGULATORY ACTION ...........................................................................................5 1.2 RECOMMENDATION ON POSTMARKETING ACTIONS ....................................................................................5 1.2.1 Risk Management Activity ....................................................................................................................5 1.3 SUMMARY OF CLINICAL FINDINGS ..............................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Atorvastatin Calcium)
    PRODUCT INFORMATION LIPITOR® (atorvastatin calcium) NAME OF THE MEDICINE LIPITOR atorvastatin (as calcium) 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg tablets. LIPITOR contains the active ingredient atorvastatin calcium. The structural formula of atorvastatin calcium is shown below: CH3 CH3 CH OH OH O O CH CH CH C NHC 2 - N CH2 CH2 CH2 O •Ca 2+ •3H2 O F 2 Chemical name: [R-(R*,R*)]-2-(4-fluorophenyl)-ß,-dihydroxy-5-(1-methylethyl)- 3-phenyl-4-[(phenylamino) carbonyl] -1H-pyrrole -1-heptanoic acid, calcium salt (2:1) Molecular formula: (C33H34FN2O5)2Ca.3H2O Molecular weight: 1209.42 CAS registry number: 134523-03-8. DESCRIPTION Atorvastatin calcium is a white to off-white crystalline powder that is practically insoluble in aqueous solutions of pH 4 and below. Atorvastatin calcium is very slightly soluble in distilled water, pH 7.4 phosphate buffer, and acetonitrile, slightly soluble in ethanol and freely soluble in methanol. LIPITOR tablets contain atorvastatin calcium equivalent to 10, 20, 40 and 80 mg atorvastatin. The tablets also contain the following inactive ingredients: calcium carbonate, microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, croscarmellose sodium, polysorbate 80, hydroxypropylcellulose, magnesium stearate, Opadry White YS-1-7040 and Simethicone Emulsion. Version: pfplipit10613 Supersedes: pfplipit10512 Page 1 of 20 PHARMACOLOGY Mechanism of Action Atorvastatin is a synthetic lipid-lowering agent. Atorvastatin is an inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme that converts 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A to mevalonate, a precursor of sterols, including cholesterol. Triglycerides (TG) and cholesterol in the liver are incorporated into very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and released into the plasma for delivery to peripheral tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomical Classification Guidelines V2020 EPHMRA ANATOMICAL
    EPHMRA ANATOMICAL CLASSIFICATION GUIDELINES 2020 Anatomical Classification Guidelines V2020 "The Anatomical Classification of Pharmaceutical Products has been developed and maintained by the European Pharmaceutical Marketing Research Association (EphMRA) and is therefore the intellectual property of this Association. EphMRA's Classification Committee prepares the guidelines for this classification system and takes care for new entries, changes and improvements in consultation with the product's manufacturer. The contents of the Anatomical Classification of Pharmaceutical Products remain the copyright to EphMRA. Permission for use need not be sought and no fee is required. We would appreciate, however, the acknowledgement of EphMRA Copyright in publications etc. Users of this classification system should keep in mind that Pharmaceutical markets can be segmented according to numerous criteria." © EphMRA 2020 Anatomical Classification Guidelines V2020 CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION A ALIMENTARY TRACT AND METABOLISM 1 B BLOOD AND BLOOD FORMING ORGANS 28 C CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM 35 D DERMATOLOGICALS 50 G GENITO-URINARY SYSTEM AND SEX HORMONES 57 H SYSTEMIC HORMONAL PREPARATIONS (EXCLUDING SEX HORMONES) 65 J GENERAL ANTI-INFECTIVES SYSTEMIC 69 K HOSPITAL SOLUTIONS 84 L ANTINEOPLASTIC AND IMMUNOMODULATING AGENTS 92 M MUSCULO-SKELETAL SYSTEM 102 N NERVOUS SYSTEM 107 P PARASITOLOGY 118 R RESPIRATORY SYSTEM 120 S SENSORY ORGANS 132 T DIAGNOSTIC AGENTS 139 V VARIOUS 141 Anatomical Classification Guidelines V2020 INTRODUCTION The Anatomical Classification was initiated in 1971 by EphMRA. It has been developed jointly by Intellus/PBIRG and EphMRA. It is a subjective method of grouping certain pharmaceutical products and does not represent any particular market, as would be the case with any other classification system.
    [Show full text]