Signature Redacted Signatures of Authors

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Signature Redacted Signatures of Authors -4 A Study of Two Wireless Telecommunications Companies' Globalization Strategies - An Analysis of Vodafone's and NTT DoCoMo's Foreign Investments by Hyungchul Joo B.S. Computer Engineering Seoul National University, 1989 & Peter D. Honkanen B.S. Electrical Engineering Boston University, 1985 Submitted to the Sloan School of Management in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Degree of Master of Science in Management at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2003 D 2003 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved Signature redacted Signatures of Authors .... ,....... ........ ,I.... ........... .,............. ISTo anSchool of Management May 9, 2003 Signature redacted C ertified b y ......................................................................................... Arnoldo C. Hax Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Management Thesis Supervisor Signature redacted A ccepted by........................................... ....... "tephen J. Sacca Director, Sloan Fellows Program ASSACHUStJSTSINSTITUTE IFCTHWLOGY ACIEARCHIVES A UG 0 4 2003 EIBFJI1 LIBRARIES U -~ -~ A Study of Two Wireless Telecommunications Companies' Globalization Strategies - An Analysis of Vodafone's and NTT DoCoMo's Foreign Investments by Hyungchul Joo & Peter D. Honkanen Submitted to the Sloan School of Management in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Degree of Master of Science in Management ABSTRACT NTT DoCoMo's and Vodafone's globalization strategies, as expressed through their foreign investments, were examined via direct interviews, reviews of (the company's) published information, market analyst and research reports, and financial news articles. The resulting data was collated and analyzed via the application of several strategic analysis tools, including those developed by Hax & Maljuf, the Delta model (Hax & Wilde), and the Five Forces (Porter). The foreign investments made by each firm reflect the objectives of their respective globalization strategies, as constrained by their unique corporate strengths and weaknesses - these strategies target the key drivers of the wireless telecomm market, the number of subscribers and ARPU, but in very different ways; Vodafone has focused on increasing its subscriber base by acquiring controlling interests in the number one (or number two) wireless operator in each target region (constrained primarily to "developed" areas). It has addressed ARPU by expanding its range of services to include wireless internet. NTT DoCoMo has focused on the proliferation of its wireless multi-media technology to increase its subscriber base; it has set the pace for improved service and expanded applications with its i-mode service running on its W-CDMA network. The relative success of Vodafone's and NTT DoCoMo's foreign investment and globalizations strategies are examined, and alternative strategies, with their pro's and con's, are suggested. Thesis Supervisor: Arnoldo C. Hax Title: Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Management 2 Table of Contents 3 List of Tables 5 List of Figures 7 Glossary 8 1. Introduction 13 1.1. NTT DoCoMo 13 1.2. Vodafone 14 1.3. Purpose of this Paper 14 1.4. Analytical methodologies 14 1.4.1.Data Collection 15 1.4.2.Analytical models 16 2. Globalization and Foreign Investment Strategies 19 2.1. NTT DoCoMo's Corporate Strategy - Globalization 19 2.1.1. Central Focus of Corporate Strategy 19 2.1.2. Corporate Internal Scrutiny 20 2.1.2.1. Mission of the Firm 20 2.1.2.2. Business Segmentation 26 2.1.2.3. Horizontal Strategy/Vertical Integration 26 2.1.2.4. Corporate Philosophy 28 2.1.2.5. Definition of Strengths and Weakness 30 2.1.3. Corporate Environmental Scan 30 2.1.3.1. Economic Factors by Key Geographical Areas 31 2.1.3.2. Trend Scenarios 38 2.1.3.3. Identification of Opportunities and Threats 39 2.1.4. Strategic Posture of the firm 40 2.1.4.1. Strategic Thrusts 40 2.1.4.2. Corporate Performance Objectives 41 2.2. NTT DoCoMo's Foreign Investments 42 2.2.1. Policies 43 2.2.2. Deal Structures 44 2.2.3. Management 45 2.2.4. Evaluation of Performance 46 2.3. Vodafone's Corporate Strategy - Globalization 48 2.3.1. Central Focus of Corporate strategy 48 2.3.2. Corporate Internal Scrutiny 49 2.3.2.1. Mission of the firm 49 2.3.2.2. Business Segmentation 57 2.3.2.3. Horizontal Strategy/Vertical Integration 58 2.3.2.4. Corporate Philosophy 61 2.3.2.5. Identification of Strength and Weakness 63 2.3.3. Corporate Environmental Scan 63 2.3.3.1. Economic Factors by key Geographical Areas 63 2.3.3.2. Trend Scenarios 63 2.3.3.3. Identification of Opportunity and Threat 64 2.3.4. Strategic Posture of the firm focusing on globalization 64 3 2.3.4.1. Strategic Thrusts 64 2.3.4.2. Corporate Performance Objectives 66 2.4. Vodafone's Foreign Investments 67 2.4.1.Policies 68 2.4.2.Deal Structures 69 2.4.3.Management 70 2.4.4.Evaluation of Performance 72 3. Strategic Performance 74 3.1. Strategic Positioning in the Global Market - Hax's Delta Model 74 3.1.1. Strategic Options in the Global Wireless Telecom Industry 74 3.1.1.1. Best Product 76 3.1.1.1.1. Low Cost 76 3.1.1.1.2. Differentiation 77 3.1.1.2. Total Customer Solution 79 3.1.1.3. System Lock-In 80 3.1.2. Strategic Options - NTT DoCoMo 83 3.1.3. Strategic Options - Vodafone 84 3.2. Competition in the Global Wireless Telecom Industry - A Forecast 85 3.2.1.Rivalry - Economies of Scale and Scope 85 3.2.1.1. Global Market and Technology Growth 85 3.2.1.2. Competition via Scale 90 3.2.1.3. Competition via Scope 93 3.2.1.4. Rivalry via Global Economies of Scale & Scope - A Look Forward 97 3.2.1.4.1. Other Is tier Operators 97 3.2.1.4.1.1. mmO2 97 3.2.1.4.1.2. TIM 99 3.2.1.4.1.3. Telefonica 101 3.2.1.4.1.4. U.S. Operators 103 3.2.1.4.1.5. KDDI 104 3.2.1.4.1.6. China Mobile 104 3.2.1.4.1.7. China Unicom 105 3.2.1.4.2. A Scenario - Cooperation for Global Economies of Scale and Scope 106 3.2.2. Other Forces 110 3.2.2.1. Barriers to Entry and Exit 110 3.2.2.2. Power of Suppliers 110 3.2.2.3. Power of Buyers 111 3.2.2.4. Substitutes 112 3.2.2.5. Overall Effectiveness 112 4. Conclusion 112 Attachment 1 116 Bibliography 117 4 List of Tables 2.1 NTT DoCoMo Existing and New Product Scope and Priority Assessment Chart 20 2.2 NTT DoCoMo Existing and New Market Scope and Priority Assessment Chart 21 2.3 NTT DoCoMo Existing and New Geographic Scope and Priority Assessment Chart 22 2.4 NTT DoCoMo Existing and New Unique Competencies and Priority Assessment 23 2.5 NTT DoCoMo Challenges Emerging from Changes in the Mission of the Firm 24 2.6 NTT DoCoMo Mission Statement 25 2.7 NTT DoCoMo Business Segmentation with Rational 26 2.8 NTT DoCoMo Horizontal Strategy / Vertical Integration 27 2.9 NTT DoCoMo Corporate Philosophy 28 2.10 NTT DoCoMo Corporate Strengths and Weaknesses 30 2.11 Economic Factors by 4 Major Geographical Areas in Global Market 31 2.12 Economic Factors by 5 Major Nations in Western Europe 32 2.13 Economic Factors by other 11 nations in Western Europe 33 2.14 Economic Factors by 5 Well-Developed Nations in Asia Pacific 35 2.15 Economic Factors by 3 Fast Growing Nations in Asia Pacific 36 2.16 Economic Factors by Five Nations in Eastern Europe and America 37 2.17 NTT DoCoMo Trend Scenarios 38 2.18 NTT DoCoMo Corporate Opportunities and Threats 39 2.19 NTT DoCoMo Corporate Strategic Thrusts 40 2.20 NTT DoCoMo Corporate Performance Objectives 41 2.21 NTT DoCoMo Foreign Investments 42 2.22 NTT DoCoMo Advantages / Disadvantages of Minority Stake Investments 44 2.23 NTT DoCoMo United States Offices 45 2.24 NTT DoCoMo Foreign Investment Impairments 46 2.25 Vodafone Existing and New Product Scope and Priority Assessment Chart 50 2.26 Vodafone Existing and New Market Scope and Priority Assessment Chart 51 2.27 Vodafone Constituents 52 2.28 Vodafone Existing and New Geographic Scope and Priority Assessment Chart 53 2.29 Vodafone Existing and New Unique Competencies and Priority Assessment Chart 54 2.30 Vodafone Challenges Emerging from Changes in the Mission of the Firm 55 2.31 Vodafone Mission Statement 56 2.32 Vodafone Business Segmentation with Rational 56 2.33 Vodafone Interrelationship through SBU 58 2.34 Vodafone stage of value chain and integration 59 2.35 Vodafone Horizontal Strategy / Vertical Integration 60 2.36 Vodafone Corporate Philosophy 61 2.37 Vodafone Corporate Strengths and Weaknesses 63 2.38 Vodafone Corporate Opportunities and Threats 64 2.39 Vodafone Corporate Strategic Thrusts 65 2.40 Vodafone Corporate Performance Objectives 66 2.41 Vodafone major investments for the past four years 68 2.42 Vodafone Foreign Investment Deal Structures - The Past Four Years 69 2.43 Vodafone Management Committees 71 3.1 Best Product Option in Global Wireless Telecom Service Competition 79 3.2 Total Customer Solution Options in Global Wireless Telecom Service Competition 80 3.3 Complementors of Global Wireless Telecommunication Industry 80 5 3.4 System Lock-In Option in Global Wireless Telecom Service Competition 82 3.5 Classification of Global Wireless Telecom Market 93 3.6 Classification of Western European Wireless Telecom Market. 94 3.7 mmO2's subscribers and market share 98 3.8 Subscribers and market share for TIM operations 100 3.9 Overview of U.S.
Recommended publications
  • ITIF Files Comments Supporting T-Mobile-Sprint Merger
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Applications of T-Mobile US, Inc. and Sprint ) WT Docket No. 18-197 Corporation for Consent to Transfer Control of ) Licenses and Authorizations ) OPPOSITION TO PETITIONS TO DENY OF ITIF The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (“ITIF”)1 appreciates this opportunity to comment in support of the pending merger of T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) and Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”).2 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ITIF supports this transaction with the belief that the merger advances innovative wireless broadband services, offers significant benefits that will ultimately flow to consumers, and presents few concerns in terms of competition. The merger offers significant scale and operational efficiencies that will help accelerate the transition to next generation, 5G networks, intensifying competition, and bringing numerous benefits that flow throughout the economy. An honest examination of the facts should find this merger in the public interest under sections 214(a) and 310(d) of the Communications Act.3 Petitions to deny the merger do not fully appreciate the synergies of the transaction and take too myopic a view of how competition functions in today’s media and telecommunications landscape. Some critics of the merger focus narrowly on the number of competitors, decrying this merger as a 4 to 3 reduction. This view does not appreciate companies on the cusp of wireless entry, such as cable firms, or, more importantly, the 1 The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) is a non-partisan research and educational institute – a think tank – whose mission is to formulate and promote public policies to advance technological innovation and productivity internationally, in Washington, and in the states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Konkurrenz Group Washington, Dc
    THE KONKURRENZ GROUP WASHINGTON, DC Allen P. Grunes 202-644-9760 | [email protected] REDACTED—FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION May 31, 2019 Marlene H. Dortch Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 RE: Ex Parte Notice. Applications of T-Mobile, US, Inc. and Sprint Corporation for Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations. WT Docket No. 18-197. Dear Ms. Dortch: The Communications Workers of America (“CWA”) submits this written ex parte letter in response to the May 20, 2019 letter from T-Mobile and Sprint (“Applicants”) that describes the Applicants’ proposed commitments related to their proposed merger (“Commitment Letter”).1 The Commitment Letter fails to address the significant competitive harm, spectrum consolidation, and loss of 30,000 jobs that would result from the transaction. Further, the Applicants’ unverifiable rural deployment commitments would leave as many as 39.2 million rural households without access to the “New T-Mobile’s” high-speed 5G network. Moreover, the so-called “voluntary contributions” the Applicants proffer for failure to meet deployment commitments are toothless; not only are they tax-deductible as “voluntary contributions” to the U.S. Treasury, they represent an infinitesimal portion of the $74 billion 2018 pro forma revenue of the combined T-Mobile/Sprint. 1 Letter from Regina M. Keeney and Richard Metzger, Counsel to Sprint Corporation, and Nancy J. Victory and Michael Senkowski, Counsel to T-Mobile US Inc. to Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, WT Docket No. 18-197 (May 20, 2019) (“Commitment Letter”). 5335 Wisconsin Ave., N.W. | Suite 440 | Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Corporate Philosophy Information Revolution – Happiness for everyone Vision The corporate group needed most by people around the world SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 001 A History of Challenges A History of Challenges The view is different when you challenge yourself Continuing to take on new challenges and embrace change without fear. Driving business forward through exhaustive debate. This is the SoftBank Group’s DNA. SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 002 A History of Challenges Established SoftBank Japan. 1981 Commenced operations as a distributor of packaged software. 1982 Entered the publishing business. Launched Oh! PC and Oh! MZ, monthly magazines introducing PCs and software by manufacturer. 1994 Acquired events division from Ziff Communications Company of the U.S. through SoftBank Holdings Inc. 1996 Acquired Ziff-Davis Publishing Company, U.S. publisher of PC WEEK magazine and provider of leading-edge information on the PC industry. SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 003 A History of Challenges Established Yahoo Japan through joint investment with Yahoo! Inc. in the U.S. 1996 Began to develop into an Internet company at full scale. Yahoo Japan Net income* 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 FY (Note) Accounting standard: JGAAP up to fiscal 2012; IFRSs from fiscal 2013 onward. * Net income attributable to owners of the parent. SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 004 A History of Challenges Made full-scale entry into the telecommunications business. 2000s Contributed to faster, more affordable telecommunications services in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Network Slicing
    AN INTRODUCTION TO NETWORK SLICING An Introduction to Network Slicing Copyright © 2017 GSM Association AN INTRODUCTION TO NETWORK SLICING About the GSMA Future Networks Programme The GSMA represents the interests of mobile operators The GSMA’s Future Networks is designed to help operators worldwide, uniting nearly 800 operators with almost 300 and the wider mobile industry to deliver All-IP networks so companies in the broader mobile ecosystem, including handset that everyone benefits regardless of where their starting point and device makers, software companies, equipment providers might be on the journey. and internet companies, as well as organisations in adjacent industry sectors. The GSMA also produces industry-leading The programme has three key work-streams focused on: events such as Mobile World Congress, Mobile World Congress The development and deployment of IP services, The Shanghai, Mobile World Congress Americas and the Mobile 360 evolution of the 4G networks in widespread use today, Series of conferences. The 5G Journey developing the next generation of mobile technologies and service. For more information, please visit the GSMA corporate website at www.gsma.com. Follow the GSMA on Twitter: @GSMA. For more information, please visit the Future Networks website at: www.gsma.com/futurenetworks With thanks to contributors: AT&T Mobility BlackBerry Limited British Telecommunications PLC China Mobile Limited China Telecommunications Corporation China Unicom Cisco Systems, Inc Deutsche Telekom AG Emirates Telecommunications Corporation (ETISALAT) Ericsson Gemalto NV Hong Kong Telecommunications (HKT) Limited Huawei Technologies Co Ltd Hutchison 3G UK Limited Intel Corporation Jibe Mobile, Inc KDDI Corporation KT Corporation Kuwait Telecom Company (K.S.C.) Nokia NTT DOCOMO, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • WH Infrastructure Plan Faces GOP Resistance 5G Apple Chips Served
    Click here for the online version. This e-mail was created for <<Email Address>> Subscribe • Advertise Tuesday, May 7, 2019 Volume 7 | Issue 89 WH Infrastructure Plan Faces GOP Resistance UPDATE A $2 trillion infrastructure deal outlined last week by President Donald Trump and top Democrats is already losing steam. The tentative deal to repair infrastructure and devote some of the $2 trillion to broadband has run into opposition from Republicans who say it’s too expensive. Those opposed to the deal include Trump's top aide, Mick Mulvaney, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-KY, who is not in favor of the spending, reports The Washington Post. Mulvaney said Friday, he agrees with the president on a need for an infrastructure package and is trying to identify $1 trillion for that purpose. "Is it difficult to pass any infrastructure bill in this environment, let alone a $2 trillion one, in this environment? Absolutely," Mulvaney said. Continue Reading 5G Apple Chips Served Up By Huawei Apple phones with 5G chips from Chinese telecom giant Huawei? Huawei may be saying, 'why not?,’ reports CNBC. A change in strategy suggests that the company may be receptive to offering its 5G cell phone chips to Apple. At this point, the chips are only available to Huawei cell phone users. At present, Apple does not have 5G capabilities, but has used support technology from Intel and Qualcomm for its smartphones. Apple and Qualcomm are currently engaged in several legal battles involving patent disputes. Although Apple has its own processors and would not need Huawei’s Kirin 980 processor, it may be eyeing Hauweii's 5G chip in lieu of what Qualcomm may have available.
    [Show full text]
  • Jersey Coastal National Park Boundary Review
    Jersey Coastal National Park Boundary Review Prepared by Fiona Fyfe Associates Karin Taylor and Countryscape on behalf of Government of Jersey January 2021 Jersey Coastal National Park Boundary Review FINAL REPORT 27.01.2021 Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Background 3 3.0 Reasons for review 5 4.0 International Context 6 5.0 Methodology 7 6.0 Defining the Boundary 8 7.0 Justification 9 Section 1 Grosnez 11 Section 2 North Coast 14 Section 3 Rozel and St Catherine 17 Section 4 Royal Bay of Grouville 21 Section 5 Noirmont and Portelet 25 Section 6 St Brelade’s Valley and Corbière 28 Section 7 St Ouen’s Bay 32 Section 8 Intertidal Zone 36 Section 9 Marine Area, including Offshore Reefs and Islands 40 Appendix A Additional areas discussed at consultation workshop which were 45 considered for inclusion within the Jersey Coastal National Park, but ultimately excluded 2 Fiona Fyfe Associates, Karin Taylor and Countryscape for Government of Jersey Jersey Coastal National Park Boundary Review FINAL REPORT 27.01.2021 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Fiona Fyfe Associates, Karin Taylor and Countryscape have been commissioned by the Jersey Government to undertake a review of the Jersey Coastal National Park (CNP) boundary in order to inform work on the Island Plan Review. The review has been undertaken between July and December 2020. 1.2 The review is an extension of Fiona Fyfe Associates’ contract to prepare the Jersey Integrated Landscape and Seascape Character Assessment (ILSCA). The ILSCA (along with other sources) has therefore informed the Coastal National Park Review.
    [Show full text]
  • Telecommunication Provider 5Linx Accessline Communications ACN Communications Services, Inc
    Telecommunication Provider 5Linx Accessline Communications ACN Communications Services, Inc. AmeriVision Communications, Inc. dba Affinity 4 and Lifeline Communications Airnex Communications, Inc. Allvoi Americatel Corporation ANPI Business, LLC fka Zone Telecom, LLC AT Conference, Inc. AT&T Corp. BA Telecom, Inc. BBG Communications, Inc. Billing Concepts, Inc. (Refered us to AT&T as provider) Birch Telcom of the West Inc. dba Birch Communications BullsEye Telecom Cbeyond Communications LLC Century Link Communications Cincinnati Bell Any Distance Consumer Cellular Convergia Cox California Telecom, LLC Cricket Communications, Inc./AT&T Mobility Earthlink Business, LLC ‐ Earthlink, LLC ‐ Earthlink, Inc. Enhanced Communications Network INC. E. / Everything Wireless First Communications Flash Wireless Globalstar USA LLC Granite Telecommunications LLC GreatCall, Inc. dba Jitterbug IBM Global Network Systems IDT Domestic Telecom inContact, Inc. Intellicall Operator Services Intelafone LLC Intermedia Voice Services I‐Wireless LDMI Telecommunications, Inc. Level 3 Communications LightYear Network Solutions Lingo, Inc Los Angeles SMSA Limited Partnership Matrix Telecom, Inc. Mitel Net Solutions Page 1 of 2 Telecommunication Provider MCI Communications Services, Inc. Mpower Communications Corp. Network Innovations New Cingular Wireless PCS LLC NTT Docomo USA Nextel of California nexVortex, Inc. Nobel Tel, LLC OnStar LLC Ooma, Inc. Opex Communications, Inc. Pacific Bell Telephone Company PAETEC Communications Payment One Corp Phone.com, Inc. Pioneer Telephone PNG Telecommunications, Inc. Primus Telecommunications Ready Wireless SBC Long Distance, LLC Securus Technologies, Inc. Sonic Telecom, LLC Sprint Communications Company, L.P. Sprint Nextel/Spectrum Sprint Telephony PCS, LP Talk America, Inc. Telscape Communications, Inc. TING Globalinx Enterprise, Inc. fka Tri‐M Communications, Inc. T‐Mobile West LLC Metro PCS California, LLC Total Call International, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Materializing the Military
    MATERIALIZING THE MILITARY Edited by Bernard Finn Barton C Hacker Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC Associate Editors Robert Bud Science Museum, London Helmuth Trischler Deutsches Museum, Munich . sCience museum Published 2005 by NMSI Trading Ltd, Science Museum, Exhibition Road, London SW7 2DD All rights reserved © 2005 Board ofTrustees of the Science Museum, except for contributions from employees of US national museums Designed by Jerry Fowler Printed in England by the Cromwell Press ISBN 1 90074760 X ISSN 1029-3353 Website http://www.nmsi.ac.uk Artefacts series: studies in the history of science and technology In growing numbers, historians are using technological artefacts in the study and interpretation of the recent past. Their work is still largely pioneering, as they investigate approaches and modes of presentation. But the consequences are already richly rewarding. To encourage this enterprise, three of the world's greatest repositories of the material heritage of science and technology: the Deutsches Museum, the Science Museum and the Smithsonian Institution, are collaborating on this book series. Each volume treats a particular subject area, using objects to explore a wide range of issues related to science, technology and medicine and their place in society. Edited by Robert Bud, Science Museum, London Bernard Finn, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC Helmuth Trischler, Deutsches Museum, Munich Volume 1 Manifesting Medicine Principal Editor Robert Bud Volume 2 Exposing Electronics Principal Editor Bernard Finn Volume 3 Tackling Transport Principal Editors Helmuth Trischler and Stefan Zeilinger Volume 4 Presenting Pictures Principal Editor Bernard Finn Volume 5 Materializing the Military Principal Editors Bernard Finn and Barton C Hacker Volume.
    [Show full text]
  • Ofcom CEO Resists Openreach Sell-Off
    CityFibre chief gets Why we should listen UK’s dark fibre ducts to Sabio on customer in a row p28 engagement p30 VOL 21 ISSUE 3 AUGUST 2016 www.comms-dealer.com ADVERTISEMENT ADVERTISEMENT 7025_Comms DealerTHE Ear April new logoHEARTBEAT UPDATED.indd13/07/2016 110:24 OF THE UK COMMS 7025_CommsINDUSTRY Dealer Ear April new logo UPDATED.indd13/07/2016 210:24 created by Cloud Billing made easy. Multiple online billing 01256 799812 solutions designed for every business requirement. www.quickstart-billing.co.uk 3-23 Industry News Catch up with events in comms channeltelecom.com 24 Business Matters Connectivity firms CommsdealerjunePRINT.pdf 1 23/06/2016 12:11 set growth pace 32 676_CT_Comms_Dealer_40x60_advert_3.inddC 28/07/2016 1 18:20 Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. BusineOfcomss. CEO resists Interview Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. M Business. BusineYourss. success, Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. COLT ramps up YBusiness. Multiplied.Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. channel strategy CMBusiness. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. MY Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. BusineOpenreachss. sell-off Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. CYBusiness. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. 36 Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. CMY OFCOM resisted the full separation of Openreach from BT Group in last Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. Business. News Update Business.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013
    Harnessing Strengths Annual Report 2013 Year Ended March 31, 2013 Contents 01 DOCOMO’s Strengths in Action 08 Business Overview 08 About NTT DOCOMO 09 Mobile Phone Market in Japan 10 11-Year Summary of Selected Financial Data 12 Financial Highlights 14 To Our Stakeholders President Kaoru Kato discusses the challenges faced by DOCOMO in a period of tremendous change and the Company’s determination to achieve growth in the years ahead. 21 Special Feature: 22 DOCOMO’s Resolutions: Boosting Competitiveness DOCOMO’s Management Strategies 24 Customer Satisfaction Improvement Project Reinforcing Strengths, 26 DOCOMO’s Challenges: Expanding New Business Areas Pursuing New Businesses 28 Commerce Business 30 Review of Operations 30 Financial Review from the CFO 32 Management Indicators in Fiscal 2012 34 Operating Data 36 At a Glance 38 Main Initiatives 38 Networks and Billing Plans 41 Handsets 43 New Business Fields: Services 47 New Business Fields: Partnerships 50 Supporting Tohoku Reconstruction and Revitalization Initiatives 51 Contributing to Society and the Environment through Our Business Activities 52 Management System 52 Corporate Governance 56 Internal Control 57 Information Management 58 Risk Factors 60 Organizational Structure 61 Subsidiaries and Affi liates 62 Financial Data 62 Consolidated Financial Statements 68 Reconciliations of the Disclosed Non-GAAP Financial Measures to the Most Directly Comparable GAAP Financial Measures 69 Corporate Data 69 Corporate Information 69 Stock Information Forward-Looking Statements This annual report contains forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on our current predictions, plans, expectations, acknowledgements and estimates based on the information obtained by us until the date of this annual report.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared for Upload GCD Wls Networks
    LTE‐ LTE‐ REGION COUNTRY OPERATOR LTE Advanced 5G Advanced Pro Western Europe 88 68 1 10 Andorra Total 10 0 0 Andorra Andorra Telecom 10 0 0 Austria Total 33 0 0 Austria A1 Telekom Austria 11 0 0 Austria Hutchison Drei Austria 11 0 0 Austria T‐Mobile Austria (Magenta Telekom) 11 0 0 Belgium Total 33 0 0 Belgium Orange Belgium 11 0 0 Belgium Proximus 11 0 0 Belgium Telenet (incl. BASE) 11 0 0 Denmark Total 54 0 0 Denmark Hi3G Access (3) 11 0 0 Denmark Net 1 Denmark 10 0 0 Denmark TDC (YouSee) 11 0 0 Denmark Telenor Denmark 11 0 0 Denmark Telia Denmark 11 0 0 Finland Total 53 0 1 Finland Aland Telecommunications (Alcom) 10 0 0 Finland DNA Finland 11 0 0 Finland Elisa Corporation 11 0 1 Finland Telia Finland (formerly Sonera) 11 0 0 Finland Ukkoverkot (Ukko Mobile) 10 0 0 France Total 44 0 0 France Altice France (SFR) 11 0 0 France Bouygues Telecom 11 0 0 France Free Mobile (Iliad) 11 0 0 France Orange France 11 0 0 Germany Total 33 0 1 Germany Telefonica Deutschland Holding 11 0 0 Germany Telekom Deutschland 11 0 0 Germany Vodafone Germany 11 0 1 Greece Total 33 0 0 Greece Cosmote 11 0 0 Greece Vodafone Greece (incl. Hellas Online) 11 0 0 Greece Wind Hellas (incl. Tellas) 11 0 0 Greenland Total 10 0 0 Greenland TELE Greenland 10 0 0 Guernsey Total 32 0 0 Guernsey Guernsey Airtel Limited (Airtel‐Vodafone) 10 0 0 Guernsey JT Guernsey (formerly Wave Telecom) 11 0 0 Sure Guernsey (formerly Guernsey Guernsey Telecom) 11 0 0 Iceland Total 33 0 0 Iceland Nova (Iceland) 11 0 0 Iceland Siminn (Iceland Telecom) 11 0 0 Iceland Vodafone Iceland (Syn)
    [Show full text]
  • European Telecom Services: the Rise of the Wholesale-Only Model
    Equity Research 3 May 2018 European Telecom Services INDUSTRY UPDATE The rise of the Wholesale-Only model European Telecom Services Until recently it was almost unthinkable that any company would consider creating POSITIVE a third expensive parallel Telecom infrastructure, competing with EU incumbents Unchanged and cable, given the high barrier to entry/cost of rollout, relatively stable competition plus mature nature of the industry. However, we are now seeing European Telecom Services strategic moves across a number of European markets, with Open Fiber in Italy the Maurice Patrick highest profile case study, and others following. In this detailed report we analyse +44 (0)20 3134 3622 Open Fiber’s prospects, its key success factors, and identify risks to other EU [email protected] markets. We conclude that Italy is in many ways a “perfect storm”, creating a fertile Barclays, UK investment opportunity for alternative infrastructure. Only Germany and the UK are Mathieu Robilliard likely to see wholesale only on a similar scale, given low incumbent FTTH builds and +44 203 134 3288 high service provider interest. Today we downgraded BT to EW and upgraded TEF [email protected] DE to OW, and we believe OW-rated VOD and ORA are de-risked vs. peers. Barclays, UK Open Fiber – Driving cost-effective rollout and high penetration. Open Fiber will Daniel Morris double its FTTH footprint to c5m homes by end-2018, and 19m by 2023. The company +44 (0)20 7773 2113 sees c.50% penetration in “mature” areas, with newly built areas at c.10% and rising, [email protected] per our recent meeting.
    [Show full text]