Regional Road Development Project

Environmental Safeguard Monitoring Report

15 September 2017

2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report

INO: Loan 2817- Regional Road Development Project

Prepared by Project Management Unit, Directorate of Road Network Development, for the Directorate General of Highways, Ministry of Public Works and Housing and the Asian Development Bank.

NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of Indonesia ends on 31 December. FY before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2011 ends on 31 December 2011.

(ii) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars.

This environmental safeguard monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

ABBREVIATIONS ADB Asian Development Bank AMDAL Indonesian Environmental Impact Assessment (Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan Hidup) AMP Asphalt mixing plant ANDAL Indonesian Environmental Impact Statement (Analisis Dampak Lingkungan Hidup) BLHD Regional Environmental Agency (Badan Lingkungan Hidup Daerah) CTC Core Team Consultant DSC Design and Supervision Consultants DGH Directorate General of Highway (Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga) Dinas PU Provincial Public Works Agency (Dinas Pekerjaan Umum Provinsi) EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EMMP Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (issued by DGH as part of the contract) GOI Government of Indonesia GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism IEE Initial Environmental Examination IDB Islamic Development Bank MPWH Ministry of Public Works and Housing MPR Monthly Progress Report PIU Project Implementation Unit PMU Project Management Unit RKL Indonesian Environmental Management Plan (Rencana Pengelolaan Lingkungan) RPL Indonesian Environmental Monitoring Plan (Rencana Pemantauan Lingkungan) RRDP Regional Roads Development Project Sub-EARS Environmental Affairs and Road Safety Sub-Directorate UKL-UPL Indonesian Environmental Management Effort and Environmental Monitoring Effort Document (Upaya Pengelolaan Lingkungan - Upaya Pemantauan Lingkungan) 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS...... i TABLES...... ii FIGURES...... ii APPENDICES...... ii Part I: INTRODUCTION ...... 1 1.1. Brief Project Description ...... 1 1.2. Objectives of the AEMR ...... 4 1.3. Construction Activities and Project Progress in 2015...... 4 1.4. RRDP Project Organization and Environmental Management Team...... 7 Part II: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING...... 11 2.1. Environmental Approvals and Permits...... 11 2.2. Environmental Monitoring...... 17 Part III: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ...... 28 3.1 Environmental Management Plan (EMP)...... 28 3.2 Status of Monthly Environmental Report Submission ...... 33 3.3 Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures...... 34 3.4 ADB Review Missions and CTC Site Inspections ...... 34 3.5. Non-compliances and Corrective Action Plans ...... 35 3.6. Public Consultations...... 42 3.7. Public Complaints/Grievances and Resolutions...... 42 PART IV: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...... 44 4.1. Conclusions...... 44 4.2. Recommendations...... 45

i 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

TABLES Table 1: Status of RRDP Sub-projects/Packages (as of 2015)...... 5 Table 2: Environmental Documents/Permits of RRDP Sub-projects/Packages ...... 12 Table 3: Environmental Documents/Permits for Asphalt Mixing Plant and Quarry...... 14 Table 4: Status of Environmental Monitoring in 2015 ...... 18 Table 5: Baseline Ambient Air Quality Measurements...... 23 Table 6: Baseline River Water Quality Measurements ...... 24 Table 7: Baseline Noise Level Measurements ...... 26 Table 8: Status of DGH, SDEA, PMU and CTC on EMP Responsibilities...... 28 Table 9: Status of the DSC on EMP Responsibilities in 2015...... 30 Table 10: Status of the Contractors on EMP Responsibilities...... 32 Table 11: Detailed Status of Monthly Environmental Report Submissions...... 33 Table 12: ADB Review Mission and CTC Inspection...... 34 Table 13: Non-Compliances and Corrective/Preventive Actions Identified in 2015...... 36 Table 14: Complaints/ Grievances Recorded in 2015...... 42

FIGURES Figure 1: Location Sub--projects/Packages at West and North Kalimantan...... 2 Figure 2: Location Sub-projects/Packages at Central and East Java ...... 3 Figure 3: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation - National ...... 8 Figure 4: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 1: West Kalimantan .... 9 Figure 5: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 1: North Kalimantan.... 9 Figure 6: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 2: Central Java ...... 10 Figure 7: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 3: East Java...... 10 Figure 8: Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM)...... 43

APPENDICES Appendix A - Implementation of Environmental Mitigating Measures – Construction Phase Appendix B - Air Quality, Water Quality, and Noise Level Monitoring Data Appendix C - Photographs

ii 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

PART I: INTRODUCTION

1.1. Brief Project Description 1. The Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP) is financed through a Project Loan from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Islamic Development Bank (IDB). The project proponent and executing agency is the Directorate General of Highways (DGH), known as Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga (Ditjen Bina Marga) of the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MPWH), known as Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. Since October 2014, the Government of Indonesia has combined the public work and public housing sectors into the Ministry of Public Works and Housing of. 2. The RRDP aims to improve important national and strategic road corridors in Northern Kalimantan and Southern Java to encourage economic growth in these two (2) less developed and poorer areas of Indonesia. The rehabilitation, capacity expansion and new construction of roads will improve connectivity and access to services in the abovementioned provinces. Improved road infrastructure in southern Java is necessary for increased economic growth to improve access to markets and to attract investment in that area. Road network development in Kalimantan will ensure that economic development will occur in less developed and remote areas. The Project will improve access of poor rural and minority villages to income generating opportunities and social services, particularly in North Kalimantan. 3. The RRDP consists of eleven (11) sub-projects or packages and the scope of works include: rehabilitation, improvement or construction about 476 km of roads and bridges in four (4) provinces of Indonesia, namely West Kalimantan and North Kalimantan (Figure 1); and Central Java and East Java (Figure 2). Of the 476 km, about 3.860 km will involve the rehabilitation or replacement of bridges and 40 km will be the construction of new roads along agricultural areas where there are existing earthen tracks in some sections. ADB finances approximately 400 km of roads in East Java, West and East Kalimantan, and consulting services. IDB provides funding for approximately 76 km of roads in Central Java. 4. The civil works of the RRDP included widening and partial reconstruction of all roads to a minimum width of 6 m with some minor deviations. All subproject roads are designed as two-lane two-way roads, which consist of a 6-meter carriage way plus 2 x 1-meter m aggregate shoulder and 2 x 1-meter side ditch. New alignment will also be constructed along existing tracks and/or delineated areas. Rehabilitation, asphalt pavement, and widening works will be undertaken on existing substandard 2-lane gravel or asphalt roads which are strategic to meet national highway standards.

1 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Figure 1: Location Sub--projects/Packages at West and North Kalimantan

2 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Figure 2: Location Sub-projects/Packages at Central and East Java

3 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

1.2. Objectives of the AEMR 5. The objective of the Annual Environmental Monitoring Report (AEMR) is to present the environmental mitigation and monitoring activities undertaken by the RRDP in 2015. This report also includes updates on project progress, status including gaps identified in the EMP implementation and environmental monitoring data. Further, it reports on non- compliances identified in the ADB Review Mission and CTC site inspections conducted in that year. Community complaints and Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) implemented in 2015 are also reported. 6. The method employed for developing this AEMR is based on data and information that are reviewed, extracted, analyzed, and as available from the following sources: • Design and Supervision Consultant (DSC) Monthly Environmental Reports from October 2014 to December 2015; • Core Team Consultant (CTC) Environmental Specialist Site Visit Reports; and • Correspondences of/between the contractors, DSC, and CTC.

1.3. Construction Activities and Project Progress in 2015 7. The eighteen (18) road sections of the RRDP were grouped into eleven (11) construction work packages (CW). The packages including their contractor details and work progress achieved up to the end of 2015 are shown in Table 1. The contractors for the eleven (11) CW packages had been mobilized and commenced the construction activities in 2015. 8. The road sections that are combined into a single construction work package are as follows: West Kalimantan • Sosok – Tayan and Tanjung – Batas Kota Sangau were grouped as CW-05; • Singkawang - Tebas Section1 (previously Singkawang overlay), Singkawang - Tebas (Section 2), Sambas Bypass and Tanjung Harapan - Galing as CW-06; and • Galing - Simpang Tanjung and Simpang Tanjung - Aruk (Batas Serawak, Malaysia) as CW-07. North Kalimantan (previously part of East Kalimantan) • Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas and Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Phase 1) as CW-08; and • Simpang Tiga Apas - Simanggaris (Section 2) and Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong) as CW-11.

4 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Table 1: Status of RRDP Sub-projects/Packages (as of 2015)

Package No. Road Section Length (km) Contractor Activities and Progress Central Java CW-01 Tambak Mulyo – Wawar 38.46 Joint operation of PT Clearing and grubbing, common Pembangunan Perumahan embankment, and common (Persero) and PT Armada Hada excavation Graha Project progress: 2.24% CW-02 Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1) 23.75 PT.Hutama Karya (Persero) Bridge construction and road widening (excavation) Project progress: 2.94% CW-03 Wawar - Congot 14.13 PT. Jaya Konstruksi Manggala Clearing and grubbing, box Pratama, Tbk culverts, and masonry works for retaining wall Project progress: 14.41% East Java CW-04 Jolosutro – Sendangbiru 21.30 PT. Hutama Karya (Persero) Road shoulder, drainage and bridge construction Project progress: 76.41% West Kalimantan Sosok - Tayan 41.60 Joint operation of PT Yasa Patria Common excavation and CW-05 Perkasa and PT Budi Bakti Prima asphalting works Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau 37.60 Project progress: 8.71% Tebas - Singkawang Section 1 (previously 3.60 Joint operation of PT Brantas Excavation (road widening) and Singkawang overlay) Abipraya, PT Tri Citra Perdana side ditch CW-06 and PT Trifa Abadi Tebas - Singkawang Section 2 26.20 Project progress: 58.26% Sambas Bypass 6.10

5 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Package No. Road Section Length (km) Contractor Activities and Progress Galing - Tanjung Harapan 20.07 Simpang Tanjung - Galing 40.91 Joint operation of PT Waskita Bridge construction, excavation Karya and PT Yala Patria Perkasa and grade preparation, and side Aruk (Batas Sarawak) -Simpang Tanjung 11.13 CW-07 ditch Project progress: 37.12% North Kalimantan (This area was part of East Kalimantan Province prior to 2013) Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung 34.82 PT Waskita Karya Excavation and grade preparation, Palas, and Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - pavement widening and shoulders, CW-08 Sekatak Buji (Section 1) side ditch, and box culvert Project progress: 43.75% Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji 65.03 Joint operation of PT Brantas Side ditch CW-09 (Section2) Abipraya and PT Mahir Jaya Project progress: 38.99% Mahakam Raya Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris 45.00 Joint operation of PT Excavation and embankment, side CW-10 (Section-1) Pembangunan Perumahan and PT ditch, and grade preparation Perdasa Project progress: 40.12% Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris 27.15 Halla Corporation Common excavation and rock (Section-2) excavation, common embankment, CW-11 and side ditch/drainage Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong) 20.80 Project progress: 12.02%

6 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

1.4. RRDP Project Organization and Environmental Management Team 9. Several national and provincial agencies are involved in the RRDP implementation and its project management chart at the national level is shown in Figure 3. The Directorate General of Highways (DGH) under the Ministry of Public Works and Housing (MPWH) is the executing agency responsible for the overall RRDP implementation. The Project Management Unit (PMU) established within DGH are headed by the Director of the Directorate Road Networks Development, and it facilitates land acquisition, resettlement, and environmental mitigation. Further, it ensures that local concerns are addressed adequately. 10. An Officer in Charge has been designated for the PMU to oversee day-to-day activities and prepare progress reports. The PMU is assisted by the Core Team Consultant (CTC). The PMU in coordination with the Project Implementation Unit (PIU) for the Environmental and Road Safety (EAR) of the Directorate Road Networks Development ensured that the EMP are implemented throughout the project phases. The Design and Supervision Consultants (DSC) are expected to conduct regular monitoring of the EMP implementation by the Contractors and submit monthly environmental reports to the DGH/PMU and CTC. The CTC will coordinate with the DSC in this aspect. In total, there are eleven (11) contractors and/or its joint operation partners working for the respective CW in Central and East Java as well as West and North Kalimantan, and these contractors are supervised by three (3) DSCs. Figures 4 to 7 show the project management organization of the RRDP based on the contractors and DSCs working areas in West and North Kalimantan as well as in Central and East Java. 11. The DSCs worked with their respective Contractors under their supervision on the EMP implementation. During the construction stage, the Contractors are primarily responsible for the implementation of the environmental mitigation measures and associated monitoring for their respective contract work packages. The DSCs should monitor and prepare the monthly environmental reports and submit these reports to the PMU and CTC. Th DSCs appointed for the 11 CW packages are: • DSC-1 CECI Engineering Consultants, Inc., for all CW packages in West and North Kalimantan; • DSC-2 Botek Bosphorus Technical Consulting Corporation for all CW packages in Central Java; and • DSC-3 PT Perentjana Djaja for the work package in East Java Province. The CTC appointed for the RRDP is Renardet S.A. and its joint venture partners. Based on the submitted monthly environmental reports of the DSCs, the PMU with the assistance of the CTC prepares the Semi-Annual Environmental Monitoring Reports for submission to ADB through the DGH. The PMU coordinates with the DSCs on matters related to the submitted monthly environmental reports.

7 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Figure 3: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation - National

8 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Figure 4: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 1: West Kalimantan

Figure 5: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 1: North Kalimantan

9 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Figure 6: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 2: Central Java

Figure 7: Organizational Structure for RRDP Implementation – DSC 3: East Java

10 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

PART II: ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING

2.1. Environmental Approvals and Permits 12. Since the IEE of the RRDP issued in October 2011, the Government of Indonesia has promulgated the Government Regulation (Peraturan Pemerintah) No. 27 of 2012 (“GR 27/2012”) on Environmental Permitting. The GR 27/2012 requires that every business and/or activity that will generate significant environmental impacts must have an AMDAL (Environmental Impact Assessment), whereas those that do not generate significant impacts must have a UKL-UPL (Environmental Management Effort and Environmental Monitoring Effort) document. These documents are subject to approval by the Ministry of Environment and Forestry or local governments (i.e. provincial and regency/municipality) depending on the nature and scope of the business and/or activity. Based on the AMDAL or UKL-UPL approval, the business and/or activity must apply for the Environmental Permit (Izin Lingkungan) to the same government authority that granted the AMDAL or UKL-UPL approval. 13. The requirement to secure the Environmental License in addition to the AMDAL or UKL- UPL approval only applies for the AMDAL and UKL-UPL approved by the government after the stipulation of the GR 27/2012. This means that the AMDAL and UKL-UPL approvals of the RRDP granted prior to the stipulation of this GR remains valid and hence the project owner does not require to apply for the Environmental Permit if no changes or modifications are made to the mentioned documents. If changes to these documents are made, a new or amended AMDAL and UKL-UPL will be subject to a new approval process and subsequently the application for the Environmental Permit will be required. Table 2 presents the government approvals secured for the AMDAL and UKL-UPL of the RRDP sub-project/work packages that were reported in 2015. Table 3 presents the similar approvals secured for the asphalt mixing plant and quarry distributed within the subproject/packages of the RRDP. 14. There are no records indicating whether the AMDAL or UKL-UPL approval as well as Environmental Permit exist for the CW-04 road package (East Java) and part of the CW- 06 road package (West Kalimantan). There are also similar issues in terms of no records indicating the existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL approval as well as Environmental Permit for the asphalt mixing plants (AMPs) and quarries for all CW packages in North Kalimantan and East Java. However, UKL-UPL approvals have been secured for some AMPs and quarries operated by the CW packages in West Kalimantan and Central Java. Confirmation is required for the existence of these mandatory environmental approvals and permits for some CW road packages, AMPs and the quarries as identified in Tables 2 and 3. 15. The proposed addition of the 12.3 km Sambas - Tanjung Harapan road section, located in Sambas District of West Kalimantan Province, requires the preparation of a new environmental approval and permit. The design of the road was being undertaken in 2015, and therefore the preparation of an AMDAL or UKL-UPL will be proceeded by the DSC-1, after consultation with the Regional Environmental Agency (BLHD) and the Sub- directorate of Environmental Affairs and Road Safety (Directorate of Road Networks Development under the DGH).

11 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Table 2: Environmental Documents/Permits of RRDP Sub-projects/Packages

Package No. Road Section Environmental Approval/Permit Approval/Permit Holder

Central Java

CW-01 Tambak Mulyo – Wawar Length: 38.46 km

CW-02 Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1) AMDAL approval No. 6655.1/14/2005 (dated 5 October 2005) Road Agency (Dinas Bina Marga) of Length: 23.75 km granted by Governor of Central Java Central Java Province CW-03 Wawar - Congot Length: 14.13 km East Java

CW-04 Jolosutro – Sendangbiru The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL approvals for this CW Subject to confirmation Length: 21.30 km package is subject to confirmation. West Kalimantan

Sosok – Tayan UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/30/BLHKPK-A (dated 16 February Directorate General of Highways Length: 41.60 km 2011) granted by the Environmental Agency (BLH) of Sanggau CW-05 Regency Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/31/BLHKPK-A (dated 16 Directorate General of Highways Length: 37.60 km February 2011) granted by BLH of Sanggau Regency Tebas - Singkawang Section 1 (previously Singkawang overlay) AMDAL approval No. 154/BLHD/2013 (dated 18 February 2013) Length: 3.60 km granted by Governor of West Kalimantan. Road Agency (Dinas Bina Marga) of The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL approvals for this CW West Kalimantan Province CW-06 Tebas - Singkawang (Section 2) package is subject to confirmation. Length: 26.20 km Sambas Bypass The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL approvals for this CW Subject to confirmation Length: 6.10 km package is subject to confirmation.

12 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Package No. Road Section Environmental Approval/Permit Approval/Permit Holder

Galing - Tanjung Harapan UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/42/BLH-A (dated 16 February Directorate General of Highways Length: 20.07 km 2011) granted by BLH of Sambas Regency Simpang Tanjung - Galing UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/10/BLH-A (dated 13 January Directorate General of Highways Length: 40.91 km 2011) granted by BLH of Sambas Regency

CW-07 Aruk (Batas Sarawak) -Simpang AMDAL approval No. 542/BLH/2015 (dated 9 July 2015) and Directorate General of Highways Tanjung Environmental Permit No. 543/BLH/2015 (dated 9 July 2015); Length: 11.13 km granted by Head (Bupati) of Sambas Regency.

North Kalimantan

Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas CW-08 Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 1) UKL-UPL approval No. 24/660/BPDL-1/XII-2010 (dated 20 Directorate General of Highways Length: 34.82 km December 2010) granted by Bapedalda of Bulungan Regency Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak CW-09 Buji (Section2) Length: 65.03 km Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris CW-10 (Section -1) UKL-UPL approval No. 660/334/B.1.1/BLHD/VIII/2013 (dated 7 Length: 45.00 km August 2013) granted by Head of Nunukan Regency; and Directorate General of Highways Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris Environmental Permit No. 188.45/614/VIII/2013 (dated 7 August 2013) granted by Head of Nunukan Regency (Section-2) Length: 27.15 km CW-11 Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong) UKL-UPL approval No. 666/SCI/B.1.1/BLHD/XII/2016 (dated 13 Directorate General of Highways Length: 20.80 km December 2010) granted by Head of Nunukan Regency

13 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Table 3: Environmental Documents/Permits for Asphalt Mixing Plant and Quarry

Asphalt mixing plant Quarry Package Road Section Approval/Permit Approval/Permit No. Environmental Approval/Permit Environmental Approval/Permit Holder Holder Central Java

Tambak Mulyo – Wawar UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/634 (dated PT Armada Hada UKL/UPL approval based on KLH of CV Lista Karya Length: 38.46 km 23 June 2015) granted by the Graha Kabupaten Kebumen Decree No. Environmental Office (KLH) of Kebumen 660.1/158/II/2014 (dated 18 February CW-01 Regency; and 2014) The existence of Environmental Permit The existence of Environmental Permit for this facility is subject to confirmation. for this facility is subject to confirmation.

Giriwoyo - Duwet UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/UKl- PT Ratna The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL - (Section-1) UPL.059/2015 (dated 9 October 2015) approval or Environmental Permit for this Length: 23.75 km granted by KLH office of Wonogiri facility is subject to confirmation. CW-02 Regency. The existence of Environmental Permit for this facility is subject to confirmation.

Wawar - Congot UKL/UPL approval No. 665.2/17/2015 PT Jaya Kontruksi The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL - Length: 14.13 km (dated 22 May 2015) granted by KLH Manggala Pratama, approval or Environmental Permit for this CW-03 office of Purworejo Regency; and facility is subject to confirmation. The existence of Environmental Permit for this facility is subject to confirmation. East Java

Jolosutro – Sendangbiru The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL - The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL - CW-04 Length: 21.30 km approval or Environmental Permit for this approval or Environmental Permit for this facility is subject to confirmation. facility is subject to confirmation.

14 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Asphalt mixing plant Quarry Package Road Section Approval/Permit Approval/Permit No. Environmental Approval/Permit Environmental Approval/Permit Holder Holder West Kalimantan

Sosok – Tayan UKL-UPL approval No. CV Yasa Quarindo Length: 41.60 km 660.1/02/BLHKPK-A (dated 11 January The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL 2016) granted by the Regional Environmental Office (BLHD) of Sanggau CW-05 Tanjung - Batas Kota approval or Environmental Permit for this - Regency. Sanggau facility is subject to confirmation. The existence of Environmental Permit Length: 37.60 km for this facility is subject to confirmation.

Tebas - Singkawang Section 1 (previously Singkawang overlay) Length: 3.60 km Tebas - Singkawang UKL/UPL approval No. 31/BI.H/2015 (Section 2) (dated 23 June 2014) granted by KLH of The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL CW-06 Length: 26.20 km Sambas Regency. PT Brantas Abipraya approval or Environmental Permit for this - The existence of Environmental Permit facility is subject to confirmation. Sambas Bypass for this facility is subject to confirmation. Length: 6.10 km Galing - Tanjung Harapan Length: 20.07 km Simpang Tanjung - Galing UKL/UPL approval No. 47/BLH/2015 UKL-UPL approval No. 660.1/278.a/BLH- (dated 17 September 2015) granted by Joint operation of PT A (dated 22 December 2014) granted by Length: 40.91 km Waskita Karya and PT Jaya Kontruksi CW-07 BLH of Sambas Regency. BLH of Sambas Regency Aruk (Batas Sarawak) - PT Yasa Patria Manggala Pratama The existence of Environmental Permit Perkasa The existence of Environmental Permit Simpang Tanjung for this facility is subject to confirmation. for this facility is subject to confirmation. Length: 11.13 km

15 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Asphalt mixing plant Quarry Package Road Section Approval/Permit Approval/Permit No. Environmental Approval/Permit Environmental Approval/Permit Holder Holder North Kalimantan

Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL CW-08 Simpang Tiga Tanjung approval or Environmental Permit for this - approval or Environmental Permit for this - Palas - Sekatak Buji facility is subject to confirmation. facility is subject to confirmation. (Section 1) Length: 34.82 km Simpang Tiga Tanjung The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL - The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL - Palas - Sekatak Buji approval or Environmental Permit for this approval or Environmental Permit for this CW-09 (Section2) facility is subject to confirmation. facility is subject to confirmation. Length: 65.03 km Simpang Tiga Apas - The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL - The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL - Simanggaris (Section-1) approval or Environmental Permit for this approval or Environmental Permit for this Length: 45.00 km facility is subject to confirmation. facility is subject to confirmation. CW-10 Simpang Tiga Apas - The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL - The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL - Simanggaris (Section-2) approval or Environmental Permit for this approval or Environmental Permit for this Length: 27.15 km facility is subject to confirmation. facility is subject to confirmation. Simanggaris - Batas The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL - The existence of AMDAL or UKL-UPL - CW-11 Negara (Serudong) approval or Environmental Permit for this approval or Environmental Permit for this Length: 20.80 km facility is subject to confirmation. facility is subject to confirmation.

16 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

2.2. Environmental Monitoring 16. The IEE’s Table 21 of the INO: RRDP (dated October 2011) requires the DSC, prior to the commencement of the site works, should undertake environmental sampling (i.e. air quality, noise, water quality, etc.) to establish the baseline conditions at each CW area. Further, the DSC is required to implement the periodic Environmental Monitoring during the construction phase as presented in Table 4. It generally requires the DSC to: • Undertake monthly visual inspection of the following aspects: quarries and borrow sites; material storage; erosion; landslide/rock fall; hydrocarbon/chemical storage; waste management; surface water quality; air quality; noise; vibration; landscaping/restoration; community; and traffic management; and • Prepare monthly environmental monitoring reports for submission to PMU/SDEA and CTC. 17. The status of each environmental monitoring requirements as reported by all DSCs is summarized in Table 4, indicating that a few monitoring means were fully implemented as part of the ongoing construction activities. Some monitoring was deemed as partially implemented due to incomplete record suggesting whether the required monitoring means have been regularly undertaken and the results documented. Nevertheless, most of the monitoring means have not been implemented due to prolonged absence of the environmental specialist of each DSC. Some quarry and borrow sites are still in operation, and therefore some monitoring requirements with this regard are not yet applicable at this stage. 18. The environmental monthly reports submitted by the DSC in 2015 does not have the required environmental monitoring data indicating that both the baseline and periodic sampling have not been undertaken for the mentioned period. In the light of these data, the 2015 AEMR, however, attempts to present the available environmental baseline data sourced from the government-approved AMDAL and UKL-UPL documents of the RRDP sub-Projects/Work Packages, asphalt mixing plants and quarries/borrow pits (see Tables 5 to 7).

17 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Table 4: Status of Environmental Monitoring

Guideline Values/Standards/ Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means Frequency Status in 2015 Indicators 1. Quarries and Borrow Operation

Quarry and borrow sites Undertaken in Visual inspection to Monthly by DSC (i) Environmental Partially implemented due to the designated areas duly ensure fill is only permit/approval from absence of UKL-UPL approval licensed/ approved by obtained from licensed concerned agency. and/or Environmental Permit for concerned authority designated sites (ii) Activities shall be limited to some quarries and borrow sites. licensed designated areas only. Quarry and borrow sites Implementation of Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) No evidence of water Partially implemented as there is erosion control ponding or presence of fresh incomplete record indicating gullies. whether this inspection has (ii) No increased visual turbidity been regularly conducted and of surface water. the result reported. Quarry and borrow sites Proper site closure as Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Pre-quarry conditions Not applicable as quarries and specified in the (ii) Site left in a tidy state with borrow sites are still in environmental mitigation stable side slopes, proper operation. plan. drainage and provided with vegetation cover (iii) DSC’s report testifying to completion of restoration work 2. Material Storage Site

Project alignment, Compliance with Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Activities shall be limited to Partially implemented as there is construction yard requirements designated areas only incomplete record indicating (ii) Materials management whether this inspection has procedures implemented. been regularly conducted and the result reported. (iii) No visible puddles of oil or oil contaminated soil.

18 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Guideline Values/Standards/ Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means Frequency Status in 2015 Indicators 3. Erosion

Project alignment Implementation of Visual inspection of Monthly by DSC (i) Erosion control design Partially implemented as there is erosion control erosion prevention parameters. incomplete record indicating measures and (ii) No increased visual turbidity whether this inspection has occurrence of erosion of surface waters. been regularly conducted and the result reported.

4. Landslide/Rockfall

Active landslide/ rock fall Vegetation cover is Visual Inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Identified areas during Fully implemented as part of the sections and steep maintained. detailed design phase. construction activities mountainous slopes (ii) Adequacy, quality, and specifications of planting; Survival rate of plants. Slope stabilization Slope stabilization Visual inspection Monthly by DSC Adequacy, quality, and Fully implemented as part of the engineering structures measures, landslide/ specifications of landslide/rock construction activities (all susceptible areas rockfall protection fall protection measures. shall be protected by measures either temporary or permanent stabilization works) 5. Hydrocarbon/ Chemical Storage

Construction camps Compliance with Visual Inspection of Monthly by DSC Provision of adequate storage Not implemented environmental mitigation storage facilities facilities requirements

6. Waste Management

Construction camps Cleanliness of workers’ Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Proper collection, storage, Fully implemented as part of the camps and disposal of solid waste. camp operations. (ii) Provision of clean and adequate sanitation facilities.

19 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Guideline Values/Standards/ Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means Frequency Status in 2015 Indicators

Construction camps Proper site closure Visual inspection Monthly by DSC (i) Timely and effective waste Not applicable as the disposal. construction camps are still (ii) Site appearance restored. used. (iii) DSC’s report testifying restoration of site. 7. Surface Water Quality

Bridge construction sites Local surface waters are Visual inspection of Monthly by DSC (i) Project activities do not Partially implemented as there is protected water management cause turbidity/siltation and incomplete record indicating flow obstruction of surface whether this inspection has waters. been regularly conducted and (ii) Adequacy, quality, and the result reported. specifications of protection measures provided against washouts All bridge construction (i) Total suspended Water sample collection By DSC: Standardization of River Not implemented sites – upstream and solids (TSS) and analyses by (i) once before Categories II based on directly downstream of (ii) Oil and grease, accredited laboratory commencement of Governmental Regulation No. major rivers or after a 82 of 2001 (iii) Turbidity, construction works pollution event (baseline); and (iv) pH (ii) subsequently after a reported pollution event and/or complaints) 8. Air Quality

Sensitive sites such as (i) TSP Air sample collection By DSC: The Control of Air Pollution, Not implemented

major settlements, (ii) PM10 and analyses by (i) once before Government Regulation No. 41 schools, hospitals, etc., accredited laboratory commencement of of 1999 close to construction construction works; sites and other project- and related facilities where (ii) subsequently 1 time

20 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Guideline Values/Standards/ Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means Frequency Status in 2015 Indicators emission of high dust a year levels occur. Asphalt mixing plant Designated areas Visual inspection to Monthly by DSC i) Environmental Partially implemented due to the ensure asphalt plant is approval/permit from absence of UKL-UPL approval located >1 km from concerned agency. and/or Environmental Permit for residential areas ii) Activities shall be limited to some asphalt mixing plants. designated areas only Dust Compliance with Visual inspection to Monthly by DSC i) Measures, location, and Partially implemented as there required mitigation ensure dust suppression schedule for dust was evidence of community measures work plan is being suppression activities complaints about dust from the implemented ii) Air pollution control road construction. equipment installed on vehicles iii) No complaints from residents. 9. Noise

Sensitive areas Noise levels in dB(A) Noise meter By DSC: i) The Control of Air Pollution, Not implemented i) Once before Government Regulation No. commencement of 41 of 1999. construction ii) Complaints from residents activities; and ii) Subsequently 2 times a year 10. Vibration

Sensitive areas Compliance with Visual inspection Monthly by DSC Complaints from residents Fully implemented as part of the required mitigation construction activities and measures record of community complaints 11. Landscaping/ Reforestation

21 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Guideline Values/Standards/ Aspect / Location Parameters Monitoring Means Frequency Status in 2015 Indicators

Project alignment Progress of reforestation Visual inspection Monthly by DSC i) Adequacy, quality and Partially implemented as there is activities specifications of planting incomplete record indicating ii) Survival rate of plants whether the progress of reforestation has been iii) Watchman on site monitored. 12. Community

Project alignment (i) Consultations Consult with government On-going by DSC (i) Number of public Fully implemented as part of the (ii) Information and community groups consultations conducted construction activities. disclosure along the alignment to (ii) Recipients of project-related monitor environmental documents concerns (iii) Number of complaints.

13. Traffic Management

Project alignment (i) Number of Visual inspection to strict On-going by DSC Number of complaints and Fully implemented as part of the complaints adherence to applicable accidents construction activities. (ii) Number of traffic environmental mitigation enforcers in place measures (iii) Number of traffic and warning signs in place

22 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

19. As presented in Table 5, there are no baseline ambient air quality measurements or results available reported in 2015 for the CW packages in Central and East Java as well as North Kalimantan. However, some CW packages for West Kalimantan, particularly CW-06 and

CW-07, have baseline particulate matter (PM10) and total suspended particulate (TSP) concentrations for one road section and their respective asphalt mixing plants (AMP) and quarries. These two parameters are detected well below the Indonesian National Ambient 3 3 Air Quality Standards i.e. 150 µg/Nm (for PM10) and 230 µg/Nm (for TSP) as stipulated in Government Regulation (GR) No. 41 of 1999 on Air Pollution Control.

Table 5: Baseline Ambient Air Quality Measurements

Sampling Information Road Section / Sampling Point PM10 TSP Date Source Threshold value set by 150 µg/Nm3 230 µg/Nm3 GR No 41 of 1999 Central Java

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo - Wawar - - - - CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet - - - - CW-03: Wawar - Congot - - - - East Java - CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru - - - - West Kalimantan

CW-05 - Sosok – Tayan, Tanjung - 8 Feb 2015 - 12 UKL-UPL Quarry - Batas Kota Sangga Tambang Baru area CW-06: Tebas -Singkawang Section 1 & 2, Sambas Bypass, Galing - Tanjung Harapan • Lat. 01013’37.5” 17 58.49 • Long. 109o09’41.5” AMDAL for Tebas - • Lat. 01010’18.8” 18 62.24 Singkawang • Long. 109o01’06.4” Section 1 & 2 19 Jan 2012 • Lat. 01003’23.7” 23 102 • Long. 108o58’25.4” • Lat. 00055’02.7” 24 105 • Long. 108o59’01.0”

- Access to AMP - 30 UKL-UPL Asphalt 5 Mar 2014 - Base Camp - 28 Mixing Plant - Galian C (Quarry) - 30 17 Sep 2010 UKL-UPL Quarry - Pontianak – Sambas road - 27 CW-07: Simpang Tanjung – Galing, Simpang Tanjung-Aruk (Batas AMDAL for Sarawak) Simpang Tanjung- - Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 1 road - 72 Aruk 29 Apr 2015 - Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 2 road - 54

23 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Sampling Information Road Section / Sampling Point PM10 TSP Date Source

- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 3 road - 63 UKL-UPL Asphalt - Depan Kantor/Mess 5 Mar 2015 - 22 Mixing Plant - Quarry area 16 Oct 2014 - 17 UKL-UPL Quarry North Kalimantan

CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas, Simpang Tiga - - - - Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 1) CW-09: Simpang Tiga Tanjung - - - - Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 2) CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas - - - - - Simanggaris (Section -1 & 2) CW-11: Simanggaris - Batas Negara - - - - (Serudong)

20. There are no baseline water quality measurements or results reported in 2015 for the CW packages in Central and East Java as well as North Kalimantan. However, some water quality data are available for some CW packages in West Kalimantan, and the results are presented in Table 6 and interpreted against the water quality standards stipulated in Government Regulation No. 82 Year 2001 on Water Quality Management and Water Pollution Control, particularly Class 2 standards typically applied for water recreational purpose, aqua culture, farming, irrigation, and other water uses required similar standards, as follows: • TSS are below the threshold value of 50 mg/L, except for the quarry area of CW-07 which indicates a concentration of around 81.3 mg/L; • Oil and grease are well below the threshold value of 1 mg/L; • Turbidity exceed the threshold value of 25 NTU for most locations and these conditions are typical for water bodies in Kalimantan, which has a vast peatland, except for the CW-06 AMDAL monitoring station in Sungai Singkawang, the CW-06 and CW-07 UKL-UPL monitoring station at their Asphalt Mixing Plants; and • pH levels are within the range of 6 – 9 for most locations, except for the quarry area of CW-07 showing pH of slightly below 6.

Table 6: Baseline River Water Quality Measurements

Location Sampling TSS Oil and Turbidity pH Date Grease Threshold values 50 mg/L 1 mg/L 25 NTU 6 - 9 Central Java CW-01: Tambak Mulyo - Wawar -

24 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Location Sampling TSS Oil and Turbidity pH Date Grease CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet - - - - - CW-03: Wawar - Congot - - - - - East Java CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru - - - - - West Kalimantan CW-05: Sosok – Tayan, Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau 8 Feb 2015 30 0.15 29 6.28 - Parit area (ditch)1 CW-06: Tebas -Singkawang Section 1 & 2, Sambas Bypass, Galing -Tanjung Harapan2 29.2 0.316 55.2 6.05 - Sungai Tebas (Lat. 01013’10.1” Long. 109o08’55.9”) - Sungai Sebangkau (Lat. 19 Jan 29.5 0.377 54.6 6.38 0107’49” Long. 108o58’10.9”) 2012 - Sungai Sebakau (Lat. 01003’25.5” Long. 81.3 0.317 58.1 6.37 108o58’26.9”) - Sungai Singkawang (Lat. 20.4 0.246 11.4 6.54 00055’03.9” Long. 108o59’01.9” - Working area3 5 Mar 2014 17 0.22 21 6.26 - Quarry site4 17 Sep 2010 - - - 7.09 CW-07: Simpang Tanjung – Galing, Simpang Tanjung - Aruk5 38 <0.01 - 6.4 (Lat. 01038’21.4” Long. 09o37’4.6”) - Sungai Keranji (Lat. Apr 2015 01037’27.9” Long. 20 <0.01 - 6.2 109o37’44.6”) - Sungai Sajingan (Lat. 20 <0.01 - 6.2 01037’11.6” Long. 109o38’27”) - PT. Waskita AMP5 5 Mar 2015 13 0.23 0,225 6.5 - Quarry site6 16 Oct 2014 93 0.14 38 5.37 North Kalimantan CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas, Simpang - - - - - Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 1) CW-09: Simpang Tiga Tanjung - - - - - Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 2) CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas ------Simanggaris (Section -1 & 2) CW-11: Simanggaris - Batas - - - - - Negara (Serudong) Note: 1UKL-UPL Quarry 2AMDAL for Tebas -Singkawang Section 1 & 2 3UKL-UPL Asphalt Mixing Plant for CW-06 4UKL-UPL Quarry for CW-06 5PT Waskita asphalt mixing plant 6UKL-UPL Quarry for CW-07

25 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

21. Table 7 indicates that there were no baseline measurements or periodic monitoring undertaken or reported in 2015 for the CW packages in Central and East Java as well as North Kalimantan. However, some baseline noise was reported for the CW packages in West Kalimantan, indicating the noise levels measured are within the standards of 55 dB(A) for residential area and 70 dB(A) for industrial area as prescribed in the Minister of Environment Decree No. Kep-48/MENLH/11/1996. Slightly higher noise levels were measured and reported in the CW-06’s AMDAL for Tebas -Singkawang Section 1 & 2 which may be attributed to the sampling station locations which are along the inter-urban road/highway.

Table 7: Baseline Noise Level Measurements

Location Sampling Date Noise Level [dB(A)] Ambient noise level standard 70dB(A) for industrial area Kep-48/1996 55 dB(A) for residential area Central Java

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo - Wawar - - CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet - - CW-03: Wawar - Congot - - East Java

CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru - - West Kalimantan

CW-05 - Sosok – Tayan, Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau1 8 Feb 2015 52.0 - Tambang Baru (Quarry area) CW-06: Tebas -Singkawang (Section 1 & 2)2 72.3 ± 1.12 - Lat. 01013’37.5”, Long. 109o09’41.5”

- Lat. 01010’18.8”, Long. 109o01’06.4” 19 Jan 2012 55.9 ± 1,12 - Lat. 01003’23.7”, Long. 108o58’25.4” 69.2 ± 1,12 - Lat. 00055’02.7”, Long. 108o59’01.0” 72.3 ± 1,12 - Access to the area3 45.7 5 Mar 2014 - Base Camp Area3 45.5 - Quarry area (Galian C)4 65.8 17 Sep 2010 - Pontianak – Sambas road4 70.2 CW-07: Simpang Tanjung – Galing, Simpang Tanjung – Aruk5

- Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 1 road 29 Apr 2015 58 - Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 2 road 60 - Simpang Tanjung - Aruk 3 road 53 - Front of the office/Mess6 5 Mar 2015 62.3 - Quarry site/Penambangan7 16 Oct 2014 50.7

26 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Location Sampling Date Noise Level [dB(A)] North Kalimantan

CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas, Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak - - Buji (Section 1) CW-09: Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak - - Buji (Section 2) CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris - - (Section -1 & 2) CW-11: Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong) - -

Note: 1UKL-UPL for CW-05 2AMDAL for Tebas -Singkawang Section 1 & 2 3UKL-UPL Asphalt Mixing Plant for CW-06 4UKL-UPL Quarry for CW-06 5PT Waskita asphalt mixing plant 6UKL-UPL Quarry for CW-07

27 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

PART III: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

3.1. Environmental Management Plan (EMP) 22. The EMP containing mitigation measures to be implemented during the construction phase is defined in Table 20 of the IEE document, which is prepared by the Directorate General of Highways and approved/issued by ADB in October 2011. Each contractor appointed is responsible for implementing the EMP within its project-specific areas. Further, the roles/responsibilities and its status as of 2015 with regard to this EMP implementation is distributed within a wider organization in Table 23 of the IEE document. 23. The status of the implementation of the EMP responsibilities that should be fulfilled is presented in: Table 8 for the organizations at the national level; Table 9 for the DSC; and Table 10 for the contractors. The status is indicated as “Fully Implemented” and “Not Implemented”. If the status is indicated as “Partially Implemented” it means that efforts were undertaken to implement the mitigation measures, but the records are incomplete, hindered by organizational matters, or the responsibility is not specifically stated in the Terms of Reference/Contract, and these are described in subsequent tables.

Table 8: Status of DGH, SDEA, PMU and CTC on EMP Responsibilities

Agency/Role Responsibilities Status in 2015

Sub-directorate of Set procedures for environmental Fully Implemented Environmental Affairs (SDEA), management and monitoring based now is the Sub-directorate of on GOI and ADB requirements Environmental and Road Coordinate with PMU to ensure that Partially Implemented Safety (SDERS) of the the EMP is implemented properly and Directorate of the Road (As per the organizational that required monitoring and reporting Network Development (under structure presented in Figure 3, are undertaken as required the DGH) Environmental – there is no direct connection responsible for environmental between the PIU-SDERS and and social monitoring PMU. Coordination is done at the level of the Directorate of the Road Network Development.) Provide training to provincial and Fully Implemented District officials on the environmental (Trainings conducted by the and social management system for SDERS may not necessarily be road projects through the project but is in performance of their mandate) Coordinate with BLHD offices at the Fully Implemented District, City, and Provincial Levels with regard to compliance of the Project to GOI environmental requirements Project Management Unit Include the EMP in tender and Fully Implemented (PMU) responsible for day-to- contract documents day management and Ensure that EMP provisions are Fully Implemented implementation of the project strictly implemented during various project phases Undertake monitoring of the Fully Implemented implementation of the EMMP

28 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Agency/Role Responsibilities Status in 2015 (mitigation and monitoring measures) with assistance from DSC Ensure that DSC prepared monthly Fully Implemented reports, environmental monitoring reports for submission to PMU/CTC. With support from CTC, prepare semi- Fully Implemented annual environmental monitoring reports for submission to ADB Core Team Consultants (CTC) Prepare semi-annual reports on EMP Fully Implemented provides project management implementation (mitigation measures, support to PMU with a establishment of ambient baseline representative in each ‘Balai’ data baseline, ambient monitoring, office etc.) based on the monthly monitoring reports submitted by DSC. The semi-annual environmental monitoring reports shall be submitted to ADB through DGH/PMU. Implement the environmental capacity Fully Implemented building/training program proposed in (Not specifically mentioned in the IEE. the CTC TOR but training was The training shall be conducted for conducted for Contractors, SDEA, Office PU, P2JN, and DGH DSC and Satker/PPK) staff at provincial and district offices, and environmental staff at the provincial (Provinsi) and district (Kabupaten) local governments through training workshops on ADB’s environmental safeguards requirements and international best practice on environmental management and monitoring Develop an environmental auditing Not implemented (Not specified protocol for the construction period for in the CTC TOR) DSC’s guidance

29 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Table 9: Status of the DSC on EMP Responsibilities in 2015

DSC – 1: CECI DSC – 2: Botek DCS – 3: PT Engineering Bosphorus Perentjana Djaja Responsibilities Consultants Inc. Consulting - – East Java –West and North Central Java Kalimantan

Undertake regular monitoring of the Partially Partially Partially contractor’s implementation of the implemented due implemented due implemented due environmental mitigation measures to incomplete to incomplete to incomplete specified in the EMP records indicating records indicating records indicating whether whether whether monitoring of the monitoring of the monitoring of the EMP has been EMP has been EMP has been regularly regularly regularly conducted conducted conducted Prepare monthly environmental monitoring Partially Not Implemented Partially reports for submission to DGH/PMU and Implemented as Implemented as CTC. report submission report submission Such reports shall be the basis for the was not regularly was not regularly semi-annual environmental monitoring submitted submitted reports to be prepared by CTC for submission to ADB. Engage an accredited/licensed laboratory Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented or institution to undertake establishment of baseline data on air quality, noise and surface water quality prior to commencement of site works based on the EMMP. Prepare corresponding reports for submission to DGH/PMU and CTC. Engage an accredited/licensed laboratory Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented or institution to conduct sampling during construction phase and in response to complaints or when there are pollution events. Prepare corresponding reports for submission to DGH/PMU and CTC. Review and approve the specific Partially Partially Partially environmental management plans (Dust implemented as implemented as implemented as Suppression Program, Sewage not all plans have not all plans have not all plans have Management Plan, Solid Waste been submitted. been submitted. been submitted. Management Plan) to be prepared by the contractors as specified in the EMP Provide on-the-job training to PU Office, Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented P2JN staff, provincial and district DGH staff as well as to province and district environmental staff on monitoring of contractor’s environmental performance and preparation of monitoring reports Supervise civil works to ensure Partially Partially Partially compliance with the EMP implemented as implemented as implemented as there is incomplete there is there is record indicating incomplete record incomplete record whether the EMP indicating whether indicating whether the EMP has been the EMP has been

30 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

DSC – 1: CECI DSC – 2: Botek DCS – 3: PT Engineering Bosphorus Perentjana Djaja Responsibilities Consultants Inc. Consulting - – East Java –West and North Central Java Kalimantan has been entirely entirely entirely implemented implemented implemented Recruit an environment, health and safety Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented manager who will be responsible in ensuring that environmental mitigation measures specified in the EMP are implemented properly Implement and provide sufficient funding Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented and human resources for proper and timely implementation of required mitigation measures in the EMP Review and approve environmental Partially Partially Not implemented assessment reports required by the implemented as Implemented as as currently no Government. the record the record record indicating indicating that indicating that the existence of AMDAL, UKL-UPL AMDAL, UKL-UPL AMDAL, UKL- and Environmental and Environmental UPL, and Permit for the CW Permit available Environmental packages in West only for some Permit Kalimantan only. AMP and quarries. Undertake monitoring of the project’s Not implemented Not implemented Not implemented environmental performance based on their mandate

31 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Table 10: Status of the Contractors on EMP Responsibilities

Status in 2015

Contractors Recruitment of Sufficient funding and Environmental, Health and human resources Safety Manager Central Java

CW-01 Tambak Mulyo – Wawar Fully implemented (Mr Fully implemented Contractors: Joint operation of PT Muhammad Isro) Pembangunan Perumahan and PT Armada Hada Graha CW-02 Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1) Fully implemented Fully implemented Contractor: PT Hutama Karya (Mr Siswoyo) CW-03 Wawar - Congot Fully implemented Fully implemented Contractors: PT Jaya Konstruksi Manggala (Mr Banon Andoko) Pratama, Tbk East Java

CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru Fully implemented Fully implemented Contractor: PT. Hutama Karya (Mr Hardian Yudi) West Kalimantan

CW-05: Sosok – Tayan; and Tanjung – Fully implemented Fully implemented Batas Kota (Mr Julius Manglaia) Contractors: Joint operation of PT Yasa Patria Perkasa and PT Budi Bakti Prima CW-06: Tebas – Singkawang (Section 1 & Fully implemented Fully implemented 2); Sambas Bypass; and Galing – Tanjung (Mr Rara Ade Rohmah Sari) Harapan Contractors: Joint operation of PT Brantas Abipraya, PT Tri Citra Perdana and PT Trifa Abadi CW-07: Simpang Tanjung - Galing; Aruk Fully implemented Fully implemented (Batas Sarawak) – Simpang Tanjung (Mr Hendrik Prasetio) Contractors: Joint operation PT Waskita Karya and PT Yala Patria Perkasa North Kalimantan

CW-08: Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Not implemented Not implemented Tanjung Palas; and Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (Section 1) Contractor: PT Waskita Karya CW-09: Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Not implemented Not implemented Sekatak Buji (Section 2) Contractors: Joint operation of PT Brantas Abipraya and PT Mahir Jaya Mahakam Raya CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas - Simanggaris Not implemented Not implemented (Section1) Contractors: Joint operation of PT Pembangunan Perumahan and PT Perdasa

32 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Status in 2015

Contractors Recruitment of Sufficient funding and Environmental, Health and human resources Safety Manager

CW-11: Simpang Tiga Apas - Simanggaris Not implemented Not implemented (Section 2); and Simanggaris – Batas Negara (Serudong) Contractor: Halla Corporation

3.2. Status of Monthly Environmental Report Submission 24. The DSC-1, responsible for the execution of the CW packages in West and North Kalimantan, started to submit the Monthly Environmental Reports on May 2015 although the construction work have already started on much earlier dates as shown in Table 11. construction start date. The DSC-2, responsible for the execution of CW packages in Central Java did not submit the Monthly Environmental Reports in 2015 notwithstanding that construction works have already started for several months. The DSC-3, responsible for the execution of CW packages in East Java did not submit the monthly environmental reports from 2014 up to April 2015.

Table 11: Detailed Status of Monthly Environmental Report Submissions

Construction Start Package DSC Status in 2015 Date Central Java

CW-01 3 Aug 2015 No report submitted by DSC CW-02 23 Jul 2015 DSC-2 No report submitted by DSC CW-03 June 2015 No report submitted by DSC East Java

CW-04 18 Oct 2013 DSC-3 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015 West Kalimantan

CW-05 15 Jun 2015 Complete submission for 2015 CW-06 17 Dec 2013 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015 CW-07 4 Dec 2013 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015 North Kalimantan DSC- 1 CW-08 12 Dec 2014 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015 CW-09 4 Sep 2014 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015 CW-10 10 Jul 2014 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015 CW-11 1 Oct 2014 No submission for the year 2014 up to April 2015

33 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

3.3. Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures 25. The status of environmental mitigation measures implemented by the RRDP contractors as required by the EMP are summarized in Appendix A. The information presented in this table is based on the monthly environmental monitoring reports submitted by the DSC. It is noted that these monthly reports are not regularly submitted by the DSC to CTC. Where complete information is not available due to the significant absence of monthly environmental reports, the implementation of the mitigation measures is therefore considered “Not implemented.” Appendix B presents the environmental baseline and monitoring results available for the CW construction packages in West Kalimantan. No similar results were reported for those in Central and East Java as well as North Kalimantan. Appendix C presents the photographs undertaken at the time of the Project Mission and/or CTC site visit.

3.4. ADB Review Missions and CTC Site Inspections 26. ADB Project Review Missions with the participation of the CTC were undertaken to review the implementation of the overall projects and progress as well as environmental mitigation. The ADB Midterm Review Mission was undertaken from 23 September to 11 November 2014 and the ADB Project Review Mission from 15 September to 12 November 2015. CTC site inspections were also conducted independently in 2014 to assess the implementation of environmental mitigation measures and monitoring undertaken by the Contractors associated with the implementation of the eleven (11) RRDP’s construction packages. No CTC site visits were done in 2015 as its Environmental Specialist have resigned and have not been replaced in that year. Table 12 present the ADB Missions and CTC visits undertaken in 2015 27. The outcomes and notes resulting from the mentioned missions and site visits that require corrective actions and follow-ups are recorded and summarized in Tables 13 and 14.

Table 12: ADB Review Mission and CTC Inspection

Package No. Mission/Inspection Date Central Java

CW-01: Tambak Mulyo – Wawar ADB Project Review Mission 2015 CW-02: Giriwoyo - Duwet (Section-1) ADB Project Review Mission 2015 CW-03: Wawar - Congot ADB Project Review Mission 2015 East Java

CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendangbiru ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014 ADB Project Review Mission 2015 CTC Site Visit (12 – 14 May 2014) West Kalimantan

CW-05: ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014 • Sosok – Tayan ADB Project Review Mission 2015 • Tanjung - Batas Kota Sanggau CW-06: CTC Site Visit (19 – 22 May 2014)

34 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Package No. Mission/Inspection Date

• Singkawang overlay CTC Site Visit (16 – 20 September 2014) • Tebas - Singkawang (Section 1 & 2) ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014 • Sambas Bypass ADB Project Review Mission 2015 • Galing - Tanjung Harapan CW-07: CTC Site Inspection (19 – 22 May 2014) • Simpang Tanjung - Galing CTC Site Visit (16 – 20 September 2014) • Aruk (Batas Sarawak) -Simpang Tanjung ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014 ADB Project Review Mission 2015 North Kalimantan

CW-08: CTC Site Visit • Tanjung Selor - Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas (10 – 14 November 2014) • Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014 (Section 1 ADB Project Review Mission 2015 CW-09: CTC Site Visit • Simpang Tiga Tanjung Palas - Sekatak Buji (10 – 14 November 2014) (Section2) ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014 ADB Project Review Mission 2015 CW-10: CTC Site Visit • Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris (Section-1) (10 – 14 November 2014) • Simpang Tiga Apas -Simanggaris (Section-2) ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014 ADB Project Review Mission 2015 CW-11: CTC Site Visit Simanggaris - Batas Negara (Serudong) (10 – 14 November 2014) ADB Mid-term Project Review Mission 2014 ADB Project Review Mission 2015

3.5. Non-compliances and Corrective Action Plans 28. The status of the non-compliances and corrective action plans, both immediate and long- term (preventive) and due dates, as identified based on the ADB Review Missions and CTC site inspection, are shown in Table 13. Non-compliances that require immediate action have already been addressed. This will have to go through the review and approval process of the GOI and ADB.

35 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Table 13: Non-Compliances and Corrective/Preventive Actions Identified in 2015

Mission/ Immediate Long Term Description of Inspection Project Package/Location Corrective Status Preventive Due Date Status Non-Compliance Date Action/s Action/s

September Landslide prone East Java Put appropriate Implemented for all The Contractor to April 2016 To be - December areas at the • CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru on traffic signs to warn specified locations reassess the slope reported in 2015 specified locations. STA 18 and STA 19 + 600 (right) motorists. protection 2016 measures and West Kalimantan redesign if • CW-05: Sosok – Tayan on STA necessary for 33+850, STA 32+800, STA 32+500, approval by the • CW-05: Sp Tanjung Bts Kota Sanggau DSC and DGH. on STA 30+500, STA 29+200, STA 28+100, STA 20+200 and STA 13+200 • CW-07: Galing – Simpang Tanjung) on STA 26+575, STA 28+325, STA 28+550 and STA 29+235 STA 33+850, STA 32+800, STA 32+500, STA 30+500 North Kalimantan • CW-08: Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji (Section 1) on STA 16+000 – 16+60 • CW-08: Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji (Section 2) on Pimping village • CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas – Simanggaris • CW-11: Simpang Tiga Apas – Simanggaris, Simanggaris Batas Negara

36 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Mission/ Immediate Long Term Description of Inspection Project Package/Location Corrective Status Preventive Due Date Status Non-Compliance Date Action/s Action/s

September A considerable East Java DSC to advise Not implemented Prepare Action April 2016 To be - December number of unused • CW-04 AMP Contractors to Plan for Asphalt reported in 2015 asphalt contained store asphalt Drum Handling and 2016 West Kalimantan in drums are drums in one Spilled Asphalt leaking asphalt to • CW-05 AMP location with Disposal. the soil. • CW-06 AMP impermeable flooring. • CW-07 AMP

September Dusty conditions Central Java • Increase Implemented for all - - - - December from ongoing road • CW-01: Tambak Mulyo – Wawar monitoring specified locations 2015 works and frequency from (ongoing) • CW-02: Wonogiri – Duwet movement of trucks spot checks to and heavy • CW-03: Wawar – Congot constant visual equipment East Java monitoring • CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru • Increase watering West Kalimantan frequency from • CW-05: Sosok – Tayan, Simpang once a day to Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau, twice daily at the • CW-06: Singkawang – Tebas (Section minimum with 1 and Section 2), Sambas – Tanjung standby water Harapan, Tanjung Harapan –Galing trucks especially • CW-07: Galing – Simpang Tanjung during hot days. • North Kalimantan Prioritize watering • CW-08: Tanjung Selor – Sekatak Buji activities in (Section 1) sensitive areas • CW-09: Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji (e.g. schools, (Section 2) religious places, • CW-10: Simpang Tiga Apas – commercial and Simanggaris (Section1) residential areas)

37 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Mission/ Immediate Long Term Description of Inspection Project Package/Location Corrective Status Preventive Due Date Status Non-Compliance Date Action/s Action/s • CW-11: Simpang Tiga Apas – Simanggaris (Section 2), Simanggaris – Serudong /Batas Negara September Drainage East Java Install the Implemented - - - - December construction works CW-04 at STA 2 + 150 - STA 2 + 225 appropriate traffic 2015 has caused traffic. signs No traffic signs installed.

September Not enough lighting East Java • Install sufficient Implemented - - - - December at the bridge CW-04: On the bridge at Wonogiri lighting to 2015 construction work illuminate and site. warn on the road hazards at the bridge • Install appropriate traffic/warning signs September Obstruction at the East Java Remove Implemented - - - - December box culvert which CW-04: Box Culvert in STA 2 + 275 obstruction to allow 2015 obstructs water covered mounds of earth so that during the free flow of flow and can be heavy rains the water can flow to the water at the box cause of overflow asphalt surface and box culvert not culvert. to the asphalt functioning properly. pavement. September No traffic road East Java Install appropriate Implemented - - - - December block/sign at an CW-04: Intersection at the STA 00 + 000 road blocks and 2015 intersection where warning signs works are ongoing, causing confusion to motorists

38 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

Mission/ Immediate Long Term Description of Inspection Project Package/Location Corrective Status Preventive Due Date Status Non-Compliance Date Action/s Action/s

September No traffic signs East Java Install appropriate Implemented - - - - December installed to warn CW-04: Along alignment of Jolosutro – warning signs 2015 that works are Sendangbiru ongoing

September Accumulation of East Java Temporarily divert Implemented for all The Contractor to April 2016 To be - December water at the • CW-04: Between STA 00 + 250 to STA the flow of water locations reassess the road reported in 2015 intersection of two 00 + 300 design and 2016 downward slopes redesign if • (basin). CW-04: In the STA 00 + 325, STA 1 + necessary for 850, 2 + 800, 21 + 297 approval by the • CW-04: STA 02+200 DSC and DGH.

March- Dusty conditions East Java • Increase Implemented for all - - - August from ongoing road • CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru - monitoring locations (ongoing) 2015 works and STA 15 + 800 to STA16 + 050 frequency from movement of trucks spot checks to West Kalimantan and heavy constant visual equipment • CW-05: Sosok – Tayan, Simpang monitoring Tanjung – Batas Kota Sanggau • Increase • CW-06: Singkawang – Tebas (Section watering 1 and Section 2), Sambas – Tanjung frequency from Harapan, Tanjung Harapan –Galing once a day to • CW-07: Galing – Simpang Tanjung twice daily at the minimum with North Kalimantan standby water • CW-08: Tanjung Selor – Sekatak Buji trucks especially (Section 1), Tanjung Palas – Sekatak during hot days Buji (Section 2) • Prioritize • CW-09: Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji watering (Section 2) activities in • CW-10: Simpang 3 Apas – sensitive areas Simanggaris (Section1) (e.g. schools, religious places,

39 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

March- The relocation of East Java • Implement the Implemented - - - August 21 electricity poles CW-04 - Jolosutro – Sendangbiru relocation of the 2015 which will be poles in affected by the coordination with excavation works the concerned has not yet been agencies, implemented institutions and local residents

September Dusty conditions East Java • Increase Implemented on all - - - 2014 - from ongoing road • CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru monitoring locations (ongoing) February works and frequency from West Kalimantan 2015 movement of trucks spot checks to and heavy • CW-06: Singkawang – Tebas (Sections constant visual equipment 1 and 2), Sambas – Tanjung Harapan, monitoring Tanjung Harapan – Galing • Increase • CW-07: Galing – Simpang Tanjung watering North Kalimantan frequency from once a day to • CW-08: Tanjung Selor – Sekatak Buji twice daily at the (Section 1), Tanjung Palas – Sekatak minimum with Buji (Section 2) standby water • CW-08 and CW-09: Tanjung Selor - trucks especially Simpang 3 Tanjung Palas - Sekatak during hot days. Buji segments • Prioritize • CW-09: Tanjung Palas – Sekatak Buji watering (Section 2) activities in • CW-10: Simpang 3 Apas – sensitive areas Simanggaris (Section1) (e.g. schools, religious places,

40 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

March- Drainage East Java • Install Implemented on all - - - August construction work • CW-04: Jolosutro – Sendang Biru appropriate locations (ongoing) 2014 is temporarily warning signs West Kalimantan stopped resulting to • Resume • CW-06: Singkawang – Tebas (Sections exposed construction 1 and 2), Sambas – Tanjung Harapan, embankment work Tanjung Harapan –Galing immediately • CW-07: Galing – Simpang Tanjung

41 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

3.6. Public Consultations 29. The Public Consultations with the affected stakeholders were conducted between September 2008 to August 2011 during the project preparation for the different project work packages of the RRDP. The outcomes of this Public Consultations are documented in the IEE document. 30. No formal public consultation or public meeting associated with RRDP was reported in the DSC’s monthly reports submitted for the period of January to December 2015. However, as per information verbally conveyed by the Contractors, informal talks between the employees of the contractors and local communities on general matters of concern relative to RRDP implementation were conducted, but not documented.

3.7. Public Complaints/Grievances and Resolutions 31. Five (5) complaints from the local community were registered in 2015. These complaints were directly related to the ongoing construction activities in West Kalimantan and East Java as presented in Table 14. These complaints have been followed up and the corresponding status is presented in the following table.

Table 14: Complaints/ Grievances Recorded in 2015

Date Package Complaints Action Required Status West Kalimantan

June 2015 CW-06: Tebas – Dust pollution Constant monitoring Completed, and the Singkawang and prompt watering action is undertaken (near the junior when high dust level as ongoing effort. high school/SMP is observed 4 Singkawang Garbage Maintain cleanliness Completed, and the onsite and provide action is undertaken trash bags/cans as ongoing effort. Improvement of traffic Install appropriate Completed, and the signs traffic signs traffic signs installed CW-06: Tebas – Flow of mud into the Install barriers to Completed, and the Singkawang road due to prevent flow of mud action is undertaken embankment caused to the road while as ongoing effort. by the ongoing waiting for collection drainage works trucks Prompt collections Completed, and the of excavation waste action is undertaken materials as ongoing effort. East Java

September CW-04: Jolosutro Request of villagers to Schedule as soon Completed 2015 – Sendangbiru at reinstall the removed as possible the STA 1+833 and culverts as soon as installation of STA 2+000 possible to discharge culverts/drain water into the cave that serves as drain and water sources for Hamlet Sendangbiru

42 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

32. The role of the local community is very important during the implementation of project activities. Hence, the village heads are expected to be well informed and involved in the monitoring of the implementation of the environmental mitigation measures and respective monitoring. Any complaints and/or grievances should be reported to the Head of the Village for resolution. If the grievance/complaint is not resolved at the level of the Village Head, the same will be forwarded to the Implementation Unit (PIU)/PPK. The DSC through the Environment and/or Resettlement Engineer will assist the PIU/PPK to resolve the grievance/complaint. If it is still not resolved at the level of the PIU/PPK, the grievance/complaint will then be referred to the Balai (Regional Implementing Agency), which will be assisted by the respective DSC, Kasatker and PPK for final resolution. This grievance redress mechanism is show in Figure 8.

Figure 8: Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM)

43 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

PART IV: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4.1. Conclusions 33. This AEMR 2015 of the RRDP is compiled for the submission to ADB. This AEMR presents the status of environmental monitoring and mitigation measures (as specified in the IEE) undertaken by the contractors and DSCs working for the Regional Roads Development Project in Central and East Java as well as West and North Kalimantan in 2015. The conclusions drawn from this AEMR are presented in the following. 34. The AMDAL and UKL-UPL approvals and/or Environmental Permits as the GOI’s mandatory requirements exist for the road construction in Central Java, West and North Kalimantan. However, there are no records indicating that this environmental approval and permit exist for the CW-04 road construction (East Java) and for parts of the CW-06 road construction (West Kalimantan), and therefore confirmation with this regard is required. 35. The UKL-UPL approvals and/or Environmental Permits have been secured for some asphalt mixing plants and quarries/borrow pits operated by the contractors/sub-contractors working for the road construction in West Kalimantan and Central Java. However, there are no records indicating that this environmental approval and permit exist for the mentioned facilities operated for the road construction in North Kalimantan and East Java. 36. The proposed addition of the 12.3 km Sambas - Tanjung Harapan road section, located in Sambas District of West Kalimantan Province, requires the preparation of a new environmental approval and permit. The road design was being undertaken, and therefore the preparation of the environmental approval and permit had not been confirmed in 2015. 37. Baseline environmental sampling and periodic environmental monitoring during the construction phase, as required by the IEE, have not been conducted by the DSCs due to the absence of their respective Environmental Specialist at that time. 38. The conduct of environmental monitoring, as specified in the IEE, has been partial by the DSCs due the absence of their respective Environmental Specialist and incomplete record/monthly reports indicating whether the monitoring has been regularly conducted and the results reported. The inability to submit the required Monthly Environmental Reports can be attributed to the failure of some of the Contractors and the DSC to hire their Environmental Officers. 39. Most of the responsibilities of the Directorate General of Highways, SDEA, Project Management Unit, and Core Team Consultants to implement the EMP have been undertaken. Only few of them are either not yet implemented or partially implemented due to changes in the RRDP organization and some scope of works not defined in the ToR/Contract. 40. There are considerable gaps reported for the DSCs and their respective contractors in fulfilling their responsibilities on the EMP due to the absence of their respective environmental specialists/officers and incomplete records indicating whether the implementation of the EMP responsibilities have been undertaken. 41. ADB Project Review Missions were conducted in 2014 and 2015 to review the implementation and progress of the RRDP. CTC accompanied the Missions and

44 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

conducted its own inspections in 2014. CTC did not undertake the site inspection in 2015 as its Environmental Specialist resigned in that year. Non-conformances and corresponding corrective actions were identified and followed up for those requiring immediate actions. Some corrective actions are implemented as ongoing activity as part of the construction activity. 42. Five (5) community complaints were reported and followed up in 2015 and these related to the construction activities in West Kalimantan and East Java. The complaints were associated with airborne dust, garbage, Improvement of traffic signs, mud overflow onto the road, and request of villagers to reinstall the removed culverts. No community grievance redress mechanism was reported for 2015

4.2. Recommendations 43. Based on the aforementioned conclusions of the 2015 AEMR report, the following recommendations are presented in this report. 44. The absence of AMDAL and UKL-UPL approval as well as Environmental Permit for the road construction works, asphalt mixing plants and quarries/borrow pits identified in this report should be confirmed in the next reporting. 45. The conduct of monitoring for ambient air quality, surface water quality and noise level as required in the IEE of RRDP should be prioritized by the DSCs to enable assessment of the impact of the ongoing works on the quality of the environment. This is applicable for those work packages with baseline data. For work packages without baseline data, the results can be compared with the statutory standards. 46. The DSCs should immediately hire their respective Environmental Specialists to undertake their obligations for an informed and consistent implementation of the environmental monitoring and mitigation measures as well as submitting the monthly environmental monitoring report in a regular and timely manner; and the DSC should improve supervision of the Contractors on strictly implementation of the mitigation measures. 47. The DSC should monitor compliance of the Contractors to government requirements for the UKL-UPL of the asphalt mixing plants and quarries to be included in the Monthly Environmental Reports as well as for the AMDAL of some road sections. 48. The Contractors should be consistent in implementing mitigation measures and conducting regular orientation for the workers on good housekeeping practices, especially in the asphalt mixing plants. 49. The Monthly Environmental Reports, submitted by the DSC to PMU and CTC, should not only contain the DGH’s checklist of environmental mitigation and monitoring, but also updates on the following: • recent status of immediate corrective actions taken to observed non-compliances and the status of action plans for non-compliances with long term preventive actions taking into consideration the due dates indicated; • the existence of the AMDAL and UKL-UPL approvals as well as Environmental Permits that have not been identified for the work packages in East Java, West and

45 2015 Annual Environmental Monitoring Report Regional Roads Development Project (RRDP)

North Kalimantan; • develop notes/documentation on meetings and consultations with stakeholders including courtesy calls and informal discussions with Village Chiefs and/or the local government and other stakeholders and government offices; and • properly document any complaints and grievances including follow-up actions.

46 APPENDI X A Implementation of Environmental Mitigating Measures – Construction Phase Appendix A: Implementation of Environmental Mitigation Measures – Construction Phase( “F” – Fully Implemented “P” – Partially Implemented “N” – Not Implemented )

Issue / Potential DSC3 DSC-1 Mitigation measures Impact CW -04 CW-05 CW-06 CW-07 CW-08 CW-09 CW-10 CW-11 1. Soil and Material

Issue: (i) At construction sites and other areas affected by project Utilization of activities, the topsoil (about 15 cm) will be kept and refilled after F F F F F F F F productive land excavation is over to minimize the impact on productive lands. (ii) It may be necessary to construct new access roads to aggregate sites, and place them through agricultural lands. These Potential impact: F F F F F F F F temporary roads will be made along existing farm tracks so as to Loss of fertility of avoid losses to agricultural lands. arable land (iii) Contractors shall present proposed construction road alignments and hauling schedule for approval by the DSC before F F F F F F F F construction is to commence.

(iv) In unavoidable circumstances, suitable compensation will be paid to people whose land will be temporarily acquired for the duration of the operations. The compensation will cover for loss of income F F F F F F F F for the duration of acquisition and land restoration.

(v) Contractors shall avoid as much as possible, usage of productive agricultural land. If such land is used, the contractor shall restore F F F F F F F F them to their original state after completion of civil works.

Issue: (i) Contractors will be encouraged to recycle reclaimed asphalt Reclaimed pavement in cold mixes or aggregate in granular or stabilized pavement surface material for subgrade and base layers and village access road maintenance and to use recyclable materials as much as N N N N N N N N possible. The material that cannot be reused will be taken to Potential impact: specific official waste dumping sites approved by the Bapedalda. Generation of spoils/solid waste (ii) All suitable material obtained from roadway excavation work will be used for construction of embankment/ earthen shoulders. P F F F F F F Issue: (i) Erosion control and slope stabilization measures shall be Soil erosion provided such as: (a) side ditches and berms, rock lining and slope walls along the road, where appropriate. (b) proper drainage system (c) shrub buffer strips sites in areas of high F N F F F F F F Potential impact: erosion risk (d) cross drainage to accommodate floodwater/run- High suspended solid contents of off in case subproject roads are on elevated fills that will obstruct river, sedimentation. natural drainage. (ii) On hill slopes and other potentially erodible places along the roadside, appropriate vegetation that retards erosion will be F F F F F F F F planted. (iii) On sections with filling and cutting, the slopes will be protected by N N N N N N N N mild slope and planted with appropriate vegetation. (iv) As much as possible, construction activities in hilly areas are to N N N N N N N N be undertaken during dry season only. Issue: (i) Spoils shall only be disposed to areas approved by local F F N N N N N N Spoils Disposal and authority. stockpiling of (ii) Spoil disposal shall not cause sedimentation and obstruction of construction materials flow of watercourses, damage to agricultural land and densely F F N N N N N N vegetated areas.

Potential impact: (iii) The spoils disposal site shall be located at least 50 m from Damage to surface water courses and shall be protected from erosion by F F N N N N N N productive land, avoiding formation of steep slopes and grassing. deterioration of (iv) Water courses (rivers, canals, etc.) shall be kept free of water quality and N N N N N N N N obstruction of excavation spoil and construction debris, floating and submerged. watercourses (v) Spoil and construction materials stockpile area shall be located away from waterbodies and under no circumstances will these N N N N N N N N materials be dumped into watercourses. Issue: (i) A balanced cut and fill approach will be designed for each road Slope Stability link. Excess cut, if any, will be used to shape the embankment side slopes, strengthening the toe of the high slopes road bench N N N N N N N N and filling the low lying public lands and for plantation in pre- Potential impact: approved areas. Erosion and (ii) Embankments shall be monitored during construction for signs of landslides erosion; long-term material stockpiles will be covered to prevent N N N N N N N N wind erosion. (iii) Retaining structures will be constructed for protection of slopes from landslides and existing vegetation cover shall be left N N N N N N N N undisturbed during construction whenever possible. (iv) Removal of vegetation and cutting of trees will be done N N N N N N N N judiciously and limited to minimum possible extent. (v) Vegetative cover shall be provided on slopes by planting grass N N N N N N N N and creepers on erosion and landslide prone sections. (vi) To the extent feasible, the length and steepness of cut and fill slopes will be minimized particularly at borrow, quarry and spoil N N N N N N N N sites. (vii) Silt dikes and runoff ditches will be installed where appropriate to N N N N N N N N prevent silt from entering farmland and water bodies. 2. Water Issue: (i) Drainage works shall be constructed as designed based on the N N N N N N N N Construction of historical flood data and flood forecasting. bridges/drainage (ii) Ensure bridge works shall not cause obstruction of river flow and structures in N N N N N N N N streams/rivers flooding of adjacent area. (iii) In sections along rivers and streams, earth and stones will be Potential impact: properly disposed of so that they do not block rivers and streams, N N N N N N N N Flood, inundation, resulting in adverse impact on water quality and flow regime. mudflow, pollution, (iv) Slope stabilization measures (e.g., planting of fast growing native and adverse effects species of grass and shrubs, etc.) shall be implemented on on runoff flow N N N N N N N N pattern exposed surfaces along river embankments to reduce material wash-away material. (v) Cofferdams, silt fences, sediment barriers or other appropriate devices shall be provided during bridge works to prevent migration of silt during excavation and boring operations within N N N N N N N N streams. Dewatering and cleaning of cofferdams will be performed to prevent siltation by pumping from cofferdams to a settling basin or a containment unit.

(vi) In bridge demolition sites, efforts will be made to avoid "dropping the bridge" into rivers/streams. This will be done by "sawing" appropriate sections of the bridge and using cranes to lift these N N N N N N N N sections away, or alternatively by construction of a platform onto which the bridge could be dropped.

Issue: Siltation (i) Provide slope stabilization measures on exposed surfaces by planting grass and creepers and implementation of other suitable N N N N N N N N Potential impact: measures to reduce washing away of materials. Deterioration of (ii) Construction materials containing fine particles, e.g. limestone or surface water quality laterite, shall be stored in an enclosure such that sediment laden N N N N N N N N water does not drain into nearby watercourses, but rather percolates slowly into the soil. (iii) Sediment laden construction water will be discharged into settling N N N N N N N N lagoons or tanks prior to final discharge. (iv) Construct retaining structures such as gabion baskets, rip-rap, N N N N N N N N etc. for river bank protection.

Issue: (i) Bitumen shall not be allowed to enter either running or dry Spills from Bitumen streambeds and nor will be disposed of in ditches or small waste P F F P P P P P Plants disposal sites prepared by the contractor. (ii) Bitumen storage and mixing areas as well as storage areas for Potential impact: other petroleum products used in the preparation of the bitumen Contamination of mixture shall be protected against spills and all contaminated soil water table or must be properly handled according to national and local surface drainage – regulations. As a minimum, these areas must be provided with could come from concrete flooring and surrounded by an embankment to readily spilled bitumen or contain and clean-up spills. petroleum products P F F P P P P P used to thin the bitumen. Bitumen is stored in drums which may leak or which are often punctured during handling after long periods (> 6 months in the elements) of storage.

3. Air, Noise, and Vibration Issue: (i) The contractor will submit a dust suppression program prior to Air pollution construction. The plan will detail action to be taken to minimize dust generation including specific locations, schedule, etc. (e.g., F F F F F F F spraying of roads with water, vegetation cover in borrow sites), Potential impact: and will identify equipment to be used. Gaseous and dust emissions causing (ii) Construction equipment will be maintained to a good standard health hazard to and idling of engines will be discouraged. Machinery causing F F F F F F F F workers and nearby excessive pollution (e.g., visible smoke) will be banned from residents. construction sites. (iii) All construction equipment and vehicles shall have valid certifications indicating compliance to vehicle emission F F F F F F F F standards. (iv) Siting of asphalt plants will be more than 1 km of settlements and F F F F F F F F other sensitive receptors (schools, hospitals, etc.) (v) Necessary environmental clearance shall be obtained prior to establishment and operation of asphalt mixing plants. N N N N N N N N

(vi) On rainless day undertake watering, at least twice per day, on dusty and exposed areas at construction yards, materials stockpile, construction sites, access roads, quarry areas, borrow F F F F F F F F sites and other project areas where residential sites and other sensitive receptors are located nearby. (vii) Mixing and crushing plants/operations will be equipped with dust suppression devices such as water sprays. Operators will wear F F F F F F F F dust masks and ear protection. (viii)Tightly cover trucks transporting construction materials (sand, soil, cement, gravel, etc.) to avoid or minimize spills and dust F F F P P P P P emission. (ix) Impose speed limits on construction vehicles to minimize dust emission along areas where sensitive receptors are located F F F F F F F F (houses, schools, hospitals, etc.).

Issue: (i) As much as possible, locate high vibration generation sources N N N N N N N N Noise and vibration over 50m from residential sites and other structures. from construction (ii) Regularly maintain and repair construction machinery and activities F F F F F F F F vehicles to keep these in good condition.

Potential impact: (iii) Noisy construction activities shall be stopped from 21:00 to 06:00 Disturbance/ in areas where sensitive receptors such as settlements, hospital, F F F F F F F F etc. will be affected. nuisance to settlements and (iv) Inspection will be done before construction equipment enter into other sensitive construction sites to ensure that these are in good condition and P P P P P P P P receptors. are fitted with suitable noise suppression devices. (v) Impose speed limits on construction vehicles to minimize noise emission along areas where sensitive receptors are located F F F F F F F F (houses, schools, hospitals, etc.). (vi) Install noise control walls (3.0 - 4.5m high, thick materials) at high noise sources that affect sensitive receptors (hospital, schools, N N N N N N N N etc.). (vii) Provide workers near sources of loud noise with protection N N N N N N N N devices such as ear plugs.

Issue: (i) Blasting will be carried out only with permission of Bapedalda and N N N N N N N N Rock blasting other concerned agencies, using a pre-established schedule. (ii) All the statutory laws, regulation, rules etc., pertaining to Potential impact: acquisition, transport, storage, handling and use of explosives will N N N N N N N N Explosion and noise be strictly followed. (iii) The timing will be made available to the local people within 500m of the blasting site in all directions, depending on the total charge N N N N N N N N used. (iv) Blasting will be held only during day time and shall be carried out N N N N N N N N not using high powered explosives. (v) W here possible blasting mats will be used to reduce noise levels N N N N N N N N when blasting is carried out. 4. Quarry and N N N N N N N Borrow Sites Issue: (i) The maximum gradient after refurbishment of each borrow/quarry slope shall not exceed as average value 1:3. After implementing Operation of quarry N N N N N N N N and borrow areas terraces and drainage system, vegetation cover shall be provided by seeding grass and planting both bushes and trees. Potential impact: (ii) Upon completion of extraction activities, quarry and borrow pits Loss of topsoil and shall be dewatered and fences shall be installed, as appropriate, N N N N N N N N disfigurement of to minimize health and safety risks. landscape, dust and (iii) Quarry areas and borrow pits will be left in a tidy state with stable air pollution, health N N N N N N N N and safety risks side slopes and proper drainage in order to avoid erosion (iv) To avoid drowning when pits become water-filled, measures such as fencing, providing flotation devices such as a buoy tied to a N N N N N N N N rope, etc. shall be implemented.

5. Hazardous Substances Waste Issue: (i) Hydrocarbon, toxic material and explosives will be stored in designated sites. Vehicle maintenance and refueling will be Storage of F F F F F F F F hydrocarbon, toxic, confined to areas in construction sites designed to contain spilled and explosive lubricants and fuels. chemicals (ii) Spill waste will be disposed at approved disposal sites. F F F F F F F F

Potential impact: (iii) Adequate precaution will be taken to prevent oil/lubricant/hydrocarbon contamination of channel beds. Spillage Contamination from F F F F F F F F harmful and toxic if any will be immediately cleared with utmost caution to leave no chemicals (paints, traces. fuel and lubricants, oils and explosives). (iv) All areas intended for storage of hazardous materials will be quarantined and provided with adequate facilities to combat F F F F F F F F emergency situations complying with all the applicable statutory stipulation. (v) The personnel in-charge of these sites will be properly trained and these areas will be access controlled and entry will be F F F F F F F F allowed only under authorization. (vi) Store fuel and hazardous substances in paved areas with roof and embankment. If spills or leaks do occur, undertake F F F F F F F F immediate clean up. (vii) Ensure availability of spill clean-up materials (e.g., absorbent pads, etc.) specifically designed for petroleum products and other F F F F F F F F hazardous substances where such materials are being stored. (viii)Segregate hazardous wastes (oily wastes, used batteries, fuel drums) and ensure that storage, transport and disposal shall not F F F F F F F F cause pollution and shall be undertaken consistent with national and local regulations. (ix) Ensure all storage containers are in good condition with proper F F F F F F F F labeling. (x) Regularly check containers for leakage and undertake necessary F F F F F F F F repair or replacement.

(xi) Store hazardous materials above flood level. F F F F F F F F (xii) Equipment maintenance and refueling areas shall be provided with drainage leading to an oil-water separator that will be F F F F F F F F regularly skimmed of oil and maintained to ensure efficiency.

(xiii)Discharge of oil contaminated water shall be prohibited. F F F F F F F F Issue: (i) Solid wastes/garbage will be collected in bins and disposed of Solid waste from regularly to sites approved or licensed by local authorities, contractor’s yard according to a brief and basic waste management plan prepared F F F F F F F F and construction by the contractor and approved by DSC, prior to the camps commencement of civil works. (ii) Prohibit burning of construction and domestic wastes. F F F F F F F F Potential impact: (iii) Do not permit disposal of solid wastes into canals, rivers, other Contamination from watercourses, agricultural field and public areas. Disposal shall F F F F F F F F solid waste only be to areas approved/licensed by local authorities. (iv) Properly collect and segregate solid wastes at worker camps and construction sites. Use rubbish bins for containing domestic F F F F F F F F solid wastes (v) Segregate reusable and recyclable wastes. F F F F F F F F (vi) All worn out parts, equipment and empty containers of hazardous substances (oil, paint, lubricant, bitumen, etc.) must F F F F F F F F be removed from the site to a proper storage location designated by PMU/DSC. (vii) There will be no site-specific landfills established by the contractors. All solid waste will be collected and removed from F F F F F F F F the work camps and disposed in local waste disposal sites. 6. Ecological Environment Issue: (i) A tree-cutting and replanting scheme will be prepared within the Flora first four months of the start of civil works to compensate for N N N N N N N N cleared areas during construction. Potential impact: (ii) Orientation will be provided to the workers on proper Damage to implementation of mitigation measures to protect the N N N N N N N N vegetation environment. (iii) The contractor shall prohibit cutting of trees for firewood and for N N N N N N N N use in for construction-related activities (iv) Vegetative cover (e.g., grasses and shrubs) stripped from the N N N N N N N N construction sites will be used for landslide and slope protection. (v) Construction vehicles will operate within the corridor of impact, i.e., approximately within ROW, to avoid damaging soil and vegetation. It will be most important to avoid soil compaction around trees. Generally, the rule will be to avoid driving heavy N N N N N N N N equipment or trucks anywhere into the ’drip-line’ of a tree (defined as imaginary line around a tree where rainwater falls freely to ground unimpeded by the tree’s foliage).

(vi) No trees will be removed without prior approval of Bapedalda. N N N N N N N N (vii) The contractor will not use or permit the use of wood as a fuel for the execution of any part of the Works, including but not limited to N N N N N N N N the heating of bitumen and bitumen mixtures, and to the extent practicable shall ensure that fuels other than wood are used for cooking, and water heating in all his camps and living accommodations (viii)Contractor shall not buy or use wood from the illegal sources N N N N N N N N (that come from the illegal logging) (ix) No construction camps, asphalt mixing plants, material storage N N N N N N N N sites are to be located in the forest areas. (x) Contractor will take all precautions necessary to ensure that damage to vegetation is avoided due to fires resulting from execution of the works. The Contractor will immediately suppress N N N N N N N N the fire, if it occurs, and shall undertake replanting to replace damaged vegetation.

Issue: (i) Workers shall be prohibited from hunting wild animals. N N N N N N N N Fauna (ii) As much as possible, bridge works will be scheduled in dry season to minimize adverse impacts to fishery, river water quality N N N N N N N N Potential impact: and other aquatic resources. Impact on Fauna

APPENDIX B Air Quality, Water Quality and Noise Level Monitoring Data

Air Quality and Noise Level

AMDAL CW-06: Tebas-Singkawang Section 1 and Section 2 AMDAL CW-06 Tebas-Singkawang Section 1 and Section 2 AMDAL CW-06 Tebas-Singkawang Section 1 and Section 2 AMDAL CW-06 Tebas-Singkawang Section 1 and Section 2 AMDAL CW-06 Tebas-Singkawang Section 1 and Section 2

Air Quality, Water Quality and Noise

UKL-UPL CW-05 Quarry CW-05 Sosok-Tayan, Tanjung-Batas Kota Sanggau Quarry - Water Quality CW-05 Sosok-Tayan, Tanjung-Batas Kota Sanggau Quarry - Air Quality and Noise

Air Quality, Water Quality and Noise

CW-06 Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP) CW-06 Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP) Water Quality CW-06 Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP) Air Quality and Noise

Air Quality, Water Quality and Noise

CW-06 Quarry CW-06 Quarry Water Quality CW-06 Quarry Air Quality and Noise

Air Quality, Water Quality and Noise Level

CW-07 AMDAL Simpang Tanjung-Aruk CW-07 ANDAL Simpang Tanjung-Aruk Air Quality CW-07 ANDAL Simpang Tanjung-Aruk Water Quality

Air Quality, Water Quality and Noise Level

CW-07 Asphalt Mixing Plant (AMP) CW-07 AMP Air Quality CW-07 AMP Water Quality

Air Quality, Water Quality and Noise Level

CW-07 Quarry CW-07 Quarry Air Quality CW-07 Quarry Water Quality APPENDIX C Photographs

1. Dry stockpile and base coarse material at CW-04. Can cause wind blown dust to affect nearby residential area.

2. Explosives storage area at package CW-04. The storage area is far from residential areas and with warning signs.

3. Embankment area at CW-04. There is a need to improve slope protection measures to prevent landslide and keep the material from encroaching into the adjacent property.

4. Road works and Earthworks (cut and fill, blasting) at CW-04. Permit for spoil disposal area need to be secured.

5. There is yet no allowed disposal area for excavated materials/spoils for CW-04. Securing of the necessary permit is still ongoing.

1. No warning signs on dangerous portion of the road (muddy and slippery) where drainage works are ongoing at CW-06.

2. Insufficient warning signs along road works at CW-06. Traffic management should be implemented in busy areas.

3. There is yet no allowed disposal area for excavated materials/spoils for CW-06. Securing of the necessary permit is still ongoing.

1. Insufficient access bridges for residents to their houses (CW-07).

2. There is yet no allowed disposal area for excavated materials/spoils. Securing of the necessary permit is still ongoing for CW-07.

3. Insufficient warning signs along road and drainage works along CW-07 alignment.

4. Insufficient watering at CW-07. Road is dusty and can affect workers, vegetation and residents in immediate vicinity.

5. Slopes is high and steep in some work areas at CW-07. Evaluate if necessary to use slope protection measures to prevent erosion and mitigate impact to adjacent vegetation and for safety.