Flexible, Conformal Phased Arrays with Dynamic Array Shape Self- Calibration
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Flexible, Conformal Phased Arrays with Dynamic Array Shape Self- Calibration Austin C. Fikes 1, Amirreza Safaripour, Florian Bohn, Behrooz Abiri, and Ali Hajimiri Caltech Holistic Integrated Circuits Lab, Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91011, USA [email protected] Abstract— Flexible and conformal phased arrays enable a mechanical resistive sensors are used to measure shape broad range of novel applications. One of the major challenges for deformation. The sensors add an additional interface, such systems is that they experience a change in their behavior significantly increasing the complexity of the overall system. when bent or deformed. A self-calibrating flexible phased array These drawbacks limit the scalability of the array and prevent can overcome this by estimating the relative position change of its generic arrays from adopting the calibration scheme. elements as they undergo local deformations. In this work, we demonstrate a dynamically flexible and conformal 8-element This work presents a flexible 8-element array with transmit phased array based on a custom CMOS transceiver unit. Beam- and receive capability and proposes a self-contained shape steering is demonstrated with the flexible array flat and with the calibration method using only the coupling between elements array conformed to convex and concave bend radii of ±120 mm. in the array. By using the transmit and receive capability to In addition, we propose and test a shape calibration method that measure the coupling between elements in the array, uses only the coupling between elements, using the flexible phase mechanical deformation of the array is measured. array. Keywords—flexible electronics, phased array, integrated II. FLEXIBLE PHASED ARRAY circuits, integrated circuits, calibration. A. System Overview I. INTRODUCTION The presented 1-D phased array consists of 8 Flexible, lightweight, and conformal phased arrays open a transmitter/receiver custom CMOS integrated circuits plethora of new applications ranging from RF active wearables operating at 10 GHz, each paired with a radiator. All to ultra-light weight space applications and many things in transceivers are phase locked to a shared reference signal. Fig. between. Despite their tremendous potential, they present a 1 shows the flexible phased array. The phased array is built on major challenge, as their electromagnetic performance is a flexible 4-layer polyimide and copper circuit board (total intimately tied to the physical dimensions and is thereby thickness ~12 mil). One side of the board holds the custom affected by shape modifications. For instance, the introduction CMOS IC, reference distribution network, and interface of a bend in a transmission line can adversely affect a circuit’s circuitry while radiators are mounted on the other side. The impedance matching or distort an antenna’s radiation pattern. radiator-side ground plane isolates the radiators from the other In the past, conformal design has been addressed by designing components. The components were positioned to maintain rigid, conformal RF systems for a specific, pre-determined flexibility around the axis along which the beam may be steered. shape [1]. Obviously, such rigid systems cannot conform to other shapes without a redesign and cannot be used in dynamically flexible systems such as electronics integrated with fabric. Phased arrays are particularly suited to flexible and conformal applications because they divide a given aperture into smaller elements, each experiencing small local deformation rather than a single large deformation [2]-[3]. These small deformations limit variations in the impedance matching at each element and the element patterns. However, the relative position of the elements must be ascertained to account for the shape deformation in such arrays, instead of calibrating radiator pattern and matching. This self-calibration is critical to proper operation of a flexible phased array system. A phased array can achieve the desired dynamic flexibility and conformability if it is electromagnetically insensitive to bending and capable of measuring and adjusting for changes in element position as the array deforms. For maximum utility, Fig. 1. Flexible Phased Array: (a) Circuit component side of flexible phased array. (b) In-plane view of flexible phased array. (c) Radiator side of flexible this shape calibration process should be self-contained, i.e., not phased array. reliant on external sensor(s) readout or other sources of information. In [4], an existing flexible phased array, B. Bend Tolerant Radiator signal using an integrated power amplifier (PA) or convert a received signal to baseband through a direct down-conversion The ideal radiator for a conformal phased array should receiver. The functions of the IC are controlled through a digital possess a broad, near-hemispherical radiation pattern oriented interface. normal to the conformed surface and have low sensitivity to A large NMOS switch between the outer balun arm and bending in impedance matching and pattern. Ground plane ground allows the receiver to see a higher impedance when the backed dipoles satisfy these requirements for a 1-D array. Each PA is not operating. The receiver is unmatched but has radiator is made from a single polyimide and copper sheet sufficient dynamic range for the high-power inter-element soldered to the 4-layer phased array board, as shown in Fig. 2a. coupling measurements used for shape calibration. By keeping The element pitch is 18 mm (0.6λ at 10 GHz) when the array is the NMOS switch closed and enabling the PA, the RFIC is flat. The antenna feed connects to a single-ended coplanar capable of taking a self-loop measurement (measuring its own transmission line leading to the CMOS IC. The feed from the output), which is used in the calibration process. There are two board to the radiating arms acts as a balun to drive the dipole independent phase control systems in the IC, each separately differentially. offering greater than 2π phase control. The first is the PLL- The volume above the ground plane and directly below a based phase control that controls the phase of the transmitted dipole’s radiating arms does not experience significant signal and the receiver mixer LO. The second is an IQ phase deformation with bending. Because the strongest electric fields rotator before the PA, which only affects the transmitted phase. are contained in this region, the radiator is less sensitive to The phase rotator can be programmed from an on-chip SRAM, bending. Fig. 2b and Fig. 2c present the measured pattern of the allowing data to be rapidly modulated onto the transmitted 4th element in the array when the array is flat and when it is signal. The IC is implemented in TSMC’s 65nm CMOS process convexly conformed to a bend radius of 120 mm. The similarity and the die photo can be found in Fig. 3b. of the pattern with and without bending illustrates the radiators’ low sensitivity to bending. Fig. 3. Transmit/Receive RFIC: (a) Integrated circuit block diagram. (b) Die photo. III. COUPLING SHAPE CALIBRATION The proposed coupling shape calibration uses mutual coupling between elements to determine array shape. Mutual coupling has previously been used for phase calibration of rigid arrays [5] but has not been explored as a shape calibration technique. As a flexible phased array is deformed, the relative positions of its radiating elements changes. By measuring the distance between elements, the shape of the array can be reconstructed. Flexible phased arrays naturally adapt frequency Fig. 2. Radiator Element: (a) Radiators of the array are shown while the array modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar as a distance is subjected to a 120mm bend radius deformation. (b) φ = 0 cut patterns from - measuring tool that can be implemented without significant 60° to +60° of the 4th element of the array, measured when the array is flat and when it is bent at a 120mm bend radius. (c) θ = 0 cut patterns. Both pairs of overhead to the array. patterns are normalized (dB) to the global maximum which occurs in the Bent Ideally, a bistatic radar measurement, which measures the Array, θ = 0 Cut. The simulated patterns are normalized to 0 degrees values of coupling path between two elements in the array, would be the flat measured results. The measured field is linearly polarized in the +θ sufficient to determine the distance between elements. However, direction. several non-idealities can hinder this measurement. In an array C. Transmitter/Receiver Integrated Circuit that is sufficiently dense to avoid grating lobes, the element The custom CMOS RFIC is responsible for generating and pitch is on the order of 0.5λ. This short distance limits the transmitting a high-power 10 GHz signal, as well as receiving amount of phase accumulated at baseband by the radar incident signals and down-converting them to baseband. The measurement between elements. Standard linear FMCW radar high-level block diagram of the IC is shown in Fig. 3a. The IC would observe a small fraction of a full period of the baseband uses a 2.5 GHz reference signal, which is converted to 10 GHz frequency corresponding to this return. Compounding the by an on-chip phase-locked loop (PLL) with a fixed 4x difficulty of measuring these short distances is the frequency- multiplication ratio. The output lock range of the PLL exceeds dependent phase response of active and passive components 9.9 GHz - 10.4 GHz. At 10 GHz the IC can either transmit the (such as amplifiers and transmission lines). The phase change of these components from the beginning to the end of an RF Next, the calibration procedure measures the element A chirp is insignificant in typical FMCW applications where the self-loop to find 휃 (푓) as follows: baseband signal extends for many cycles, dwarfing their effect. 퐴퐴 However, in short distance measurements, the phase change of 휃퐴퐴(푓) = 퐻푡푥퐴(푓) − 퐻푟푥퐴(푓).