CITY AND COUNTY OF SWANSEA

NOTICE OF MEETING

You are invited to attend a Meeting of the

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE

At: Council Chamber, CIVIC CENTRE, SWANSEA

On: Tuesday 23rd February 2010

Time: 2.00p.m. Members are asked to contact John Lock (Applications Manager) on 635731 or Phil Baxter (Area Team Leader) on 635733 should they wish to have submitted plans and other images of any of the applications on this agenda to be available for display at the Committee meeting.

AGENDA

1. Apologies for Absence.

2. Declaration of Interest

To receive Disclosures of Personal and Prejudicial Interests from Members in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Conduct adopted. (NOTE: Members are requested to identify the Agenda Item /minute number/ planning application number and subject matter that their interest relates).

3. Minutes of the meeting of the Area 2 Development Control Committee held on 2nd February 2010 and Site Visits held on 9th February 2010.

FOR DECISION

4. Proposed Downgrading and Diversion of Bridleway No. 22, Proposed Creation of an Alternative Bridleway, Community of Port Eynon

5. Town and Country Planning - Planning Applications. (a) Items for deferral/withdrawal. (b) Requests for site visits. (c) Determination of Planning Applications.

David M. Daycock Head of Legal & Democratic Services 16th February 2010 Contact: Jane Tinker 01792 636820

ACCESS TO INFORMATION LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1972 (SECTION 100) (AS AMENDED) (NOTE: The documents and files used in the preparation of this Schedule of Planning Applications are identified in the ‘Background Information’ Section of each report. The Application files will be available in the committee room for half an hour before the start of the meeting, to enable Members to inspect the contents). Item No. 2

Disclosures of Personal Interest from Members

To receive Disclosures of Personal Interest from Members in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Conduct adopted by the City and County of Swansea. You must disclose orally to the meeting the existence and nature of that interest.

NOTE: You are requested to identify the Agenda Item / Minute No. / Planning Application No. and Subject Matter to which that interest relates and to enter all declared interests on the sheet provided for that purpose at the meeting.

1. If you have a Personal Interest as set out in Paragraph 10 of the Code, you MAY STAY, SPEAK AND VOTE unless it is also a Prejudicial Interest.

2. If you have a Personal Interest which is also a Prejudicial Interest as set out in Paragraph 12 of the Code, then subject to point 3 below, you MUST WITHDRAW from the meeting (unless you have obtained a dispensation from the Authority’s Standards Committee)

3. Where you have a Prejudicial Interest you may attend the meeting but only for the purpose of making representations, answering questions or giving evidence relating to the business, provided that the public are also allowed to attend the meeting for the same purpose, whether under a statutory right or otherwise. In such a case, you must withdraw from the meeting immediately after the period for making representations, answering questions, or giving evidence relating to the business has ended, and in any event before further consideration of the business begins, whether or not the public are allowed to remain in attendance for such consideration (Paragraph 14 of the Code).

4. Where you have agreement from the Monitoring Officer that the information relating to your Personal Interest is sensitive information, as set out in Paragraph 16 of the Code of Conduct, your obligation to disclose such information is replaced with an obligation to disclose the existence of a personal interest and to confirm that the Monitoring Officer has agreed that the nature of such personal interest is sensitive information.

5. If you are relying on a grant of a dispensation by the Standards Committee, you must, before the matter is under consideration: (i) disclose orally both the interest concerned and the existence of the dispensation; and (ii) before or immediately after the close of the meeting give written notification to the Authority containing -

- details of the prejudicial interest; - details of the business to which the prejudicial interest relates; - details of, and the date on which, the dispensation was granted; and - your signature

Z:\Committees\A Agenda Pack\Cttees\Area 2\2008-09\08jun24\02 - Disclosures of Personal Interest.doc CITY AND COUNTY OF SWANSEA

MINUTES OF THE AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE

HELD AT THE CIVIC CENTRE, SWANSEA ON TUESDAY, 2ND FEBRUARY, 2010 AT 2.00 P.M.

PRESENT: Councillor R D Lewis (Chairman) presided

Councillor(s): Councillor(s): Councillor(s):

V A Bates-Hughes D I E Jones J T Miles A C S Colburn J W Jones C L Philpott A M Day M H Jones J C Richards W Evans S M Jones G Seaborne E W Fitzgerald J B Kelleher R J Stanton R Francis-Davies K E Marsh M Smith M E Gibbs P M Matthews D P Tucker W E A Jones

206. APOLOGIES

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors P R Hood- Williams, D H James, E T Kirchner, P M Meara, J Newbury, T H Rees, P B Smith, R L Smith, N J Tregoning and S M Waller Thomas.

207. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

In accordance with the Code of Conduct adopted by the City and County of Swansea, the following interests were declared:

Councillor D P Tucker - Planning Application No. 2009/0995 (Item 1) - personal.

208. MINUTES

RESOLVED that the Minutes of the Area 2 Development Control Committee held on 12th January, 2010 and the site visits held on 12th and 19th January, 2010 be agreed as correct records.

209. ITEMS FOR DEFERRAL

None.

210. ITEMS DEFERRED FOR SITE VISITS

RESOLVED that the undermentioned planning applications BE DEFERRED for SITE VISITS for the reasons outlined below:

Minutes of the Area 2 Development Control Committee (02.02.10) Cont’d

(Item 1) Application No. 2009/0095

Change of use of part of field from agriculture to camping for a maximum of 10 tented units for weekends and bank holidays from 31st May or Spring Bank Holiday whichever is the earlier until the second weekend in September or 9th September whichever is the later in any year at Eastern Slade Farm, Oxwich, Swansea.

Reason

To consider the impact of the development on the character of the area.

(Item 3) Application No. 2009/0890

Replacement detached dwelling at 70 Langland Bay Road, Langland, Swansea.

Reason

To assess the impact of the development given the concerns expressed about the demolition of the existing building and its proposed replacement.

(Item 4) Application No. 2009/1785

Demolition of existing dwelling (application for Conservation Area Consent) at 70 Langland Bay Road, Langland, Swansea.

Reason

To assess the impact of the development given the concerns expressed about the demolition of the existing building and its proposed replacement.

(Item 5) Application No. 2009/1271

Change of use from coffee shop (Class A3) and first floor holiday flat (Class C3) to one detached dwelling (Class C3), front canopy, porch and two new access at Compass Coffee Shop, Reynoldston, Swansea.

Minutes of the Area 2 Development Control Committee (02.02.10) Cont’d

Reason

To see the impact of the development given that it is a brownfield site.

(Item 12) Application No. 2009/1666

Side conservatory at The Dingle, Horton, Swansea.

Reason

To assess the impact of the development on the surrounding area.

(Item 19) Application No. 2009/1289

Two storey side extension, addition of pitched roof over existing flat roof, external alterations and provision of seven space car park at Llanrhidian Community Hall, Llanrhidian, Swansea.

Reason

To assess the impact of the development on the amenities of neighbouring residents.

211. SCHEDULE OF PLANNING APPLICATIONS UNDER THE TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990

The Head of Planning Services submitted a schedule of outline applications, reserved matters and planning applications. Amendments to this schedule were reported and are indicated below by (#).

RESOLVED that:

(1) the undermentioned planning applications BE APPROVED subject to the conditions outlined in the report and/or indicated below:

(Item 6) Application No. 2009/1280

Replacement bird hide and new footpath at Oxwich National Nature Reserve, Gower.

Minutes of the Area 2 Development Control Committee (02.02.10) Cont’d

(Item 7) Application No. 2009/1425

Conversion of existing barn to a holiday let and single storey front extension at Eastern Farm, Oldwalls, Gower, Swansea.

(Item 8) Application No. 2009/1565

Construction of decked area at Caravan F23, Greenway Holiday Park, Oxwich, Swansea.

(Item 9) Application No. 2009/1566

Construction of decked area with fencing at Caravan No. 179, Whitford Bay Leisure Park, Llanmadoc, Gower, Swansea.

(Item 10) Application No. 2009/1571

Single storey rear extension and increase to ridge and eaves height to part of rear wing to provide additional first floor accommodation at Fairy Lodge Farm, Burry, Swansea.

(Item 11) Application No. 2009/1596

Extension to existing shower block at Greenways Holiday Park, Oxwich, Swansea.

(Item 13) Application No. 2009/1697

Two storey rear extension, front porch and detached summer house, Bryn Eithin, Reynoldston, Gower, Swansea.

(Item 15) Application No. 2009/1763

Single storey side extension at 8 The Boarlands, Port Eynon, Swansea.

(Item 16) Application No. 2009/1779

Two storey side part single storey rear extension with addition of pitched roofs to existing two storey rear wing and existing single storey rear extension, two solar panels on the south elevation and an attached side pergola at Gambos End, Reynoldston, Swansea.

Minutes of the Area 2 Development Control Committee (02.02.10) Cont’d

(Item 17) Application No. 2009/1783

Single storey side extension at Rose Cottage, Perriswood, Penmaen, Swansea.

(Item 18) Application No. 2009/1784

Detached dwelling with integral double garage (amendment to planning permission 2005/0247 granted 31st May 2007) at former Pylewell Garage, Pitton Green, Rhossili, Swansea.

(2) the undermentioned planning applications BE REFUSED subject to the reasons indicated in the report and/or indicated below:

(Item 2) Application No. 2009/1580

Rear roof extension at 30 Frampton Road, Gorseinon, Swansea.

(Item 14) Application No. 2009/1755

Detached raised decked area and staircase at High Kiln Bank, Oxwich, Swansea.

212. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

The Committee was requested to exclude the public from the meeting during consideration of the following item on the grounds that it involved the likely disclosure of exempt information as set out in paragraph 18 of Part 4 of Schedule 12A of the Local Government (Access to Information) (Variation) (Wales) Order 2007.

The Public Interest Test, the Proper Officer (the Monitoring Officer) has determined in preparing this report that paragraph 18 should apply.

His view on the Public Interest Test is in relation to paragraph 18 that the Authority's statutory powers could be rendered ineffective or less effective where there is to be advance knowledge of its intention/the exercise of the Council's statutory power could prejudice by public discussion or speculation on the matter to the detriment of the Authority and the inhabitation of its area. On the basis that he felt that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighed the public interest in disclosing the information. Members were asked to consider these factors when determining the Public Interest Test, which they must decide when considering excluding the public from this part of the meeting.

Minutes of the Area 2 Development Control Committee (02.02.10) Cont’d

It was RECOMMENDED that as in all the circumstances of the case the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information, the public should be excluded.

The Committee having considered paragraph 18 and the public interests are applied by the Proper Officer (Monitoring Officer) resolved that the public interest in maintaining the exemption outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information and RESOLVED to exclude the public.

(CLOSED SESSION)

213. ENFORCEMENT PROGRESS REPORT

The report submitted informed the Committee of the current position in relation to all outstanding enforcement action authorised within the Area 2 Development Control Committee area.

RESOLVED that the report be noted;

The meeting ended at 2.48 p.m.

CHAIRMAN

Z: Area 2 Development Control Committee - 2 February 2010 (GB/CEB) 28 January 2010

CITY AND COUNTY OF SWANSEA

MINUTES OF THE AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE SITE VISITS

HELD ON SITE ON TUESDAY 9TH FEBRUARY 2010 AT 09.30AM

PRESENT: Councillor R D Lewis (Chairman) presided

Councillor(s): Councillor(s): Councillor(s): A C S Colburn E W Fitzgerald D P Tucker (d, e, f, only) W Evans K E Marsh

1. APOLOGIES

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors A M Day, P R Hood-Williams, D H James, S M Jones, R H Kinzett, E T Kirchner, S M Jones, P Matthews, P M Meara, J T Miles, J C Richards, M Smith, P B Smith, R L Smith and N J Tregoning.

2. DECLARATION OF INTEREST

In accordance with the Code of Conduct adopted by the City and County of Swansea, the following interest was declared:

Councillor R D Lewis - planning application No. 2009/1666 - personal - left during discussion thereof and Councillor D P Tucker presided.

3. TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING SITE VISITS

Following deferment for site visits at the meeting of the Area 2 Development Control Committee held on Tuesday 2nd February 2010, Members visited the undermentioned sites prior to their determination at the Committee scheduled for Tuesday 23rd February 2010.

a) Planning Application No 2009/0890 Replacement detached dwelling at 70 Langland Bay Road, Langland, Swansea.

b) Planning Application No 2009/1785 Demolition of existing dwelling (application for Conservation Area Consent) at 70 Langland Bay Road, Langland, Swansea.

c) Planning Application No 2009/0995 Change of Use of part of field from agriculture to camping for a maximum of 10 tented units for weekends and bank holidays from 31st May or Spring Bank Holiday whichever is the earlier until the 2nd weekend in September or 9th September whichever is the later in any year at Eastern Slade Farm, Oxwich, Swansea. d) Planning Application No 2009/1271 Change of use from coffee shop (Class A3) and first floor holiday flat (Class C3) to one detached dwelling (Class C3), front canopy, porch and two new accesses at Compass Coffee Shop, Reynoldston, Swansea. e) Planning Application No 2009/1666 Side conservatory at The Dingle, Horton, Swansea.

f) Planning Application No 2009/1289 Two storey side extension, addition of pitched roof over existing flat roof, external alterations and provision of 7 space car park at Llanrhidian Community Hall, Llanrhidian, Swansea.

The meeting ended at 12.45 pm.

CHAIRMAN Item No. 4

Report of the Head of Legal and Democratic Services

Area 2 Development Control Committee

23rd February 2010

Proposed Downgrading and Diversion of Bridleway No. 22 Proposed Creation of an Alternative Bridleway

Community of Port Eynon

Summary

Purpose: To consider removing Bridleway No. 22 from crossing an area of dunes and creating a public footpath via a different alignment through the dunes.

To create a Bridleway link to the beach from the County Highway.

Policy Framework: The Countryside Access Policy.

Consultation: All the usual organisations have been consulted which includes Councillor Lewis, The Clerk to the Parish Council of Port Eynon, Ms Locke (local representative of the British Horse Society), Mrs J. Hyett (Regional Access and Bridleway Officer), Mark Heston (British Horse Society Director of Access), The Countryside Council for Wales, Mr G. Bligh (previous local representative for the British Horse Society), The Ramblers Association, The Byways and Bridleways Trust, Corporate Property, Youth Hostel Association, Mr J.J. Rafferty, Mr V. Thomas, Mrs S. Morris, Dr White (all local residents) and Mrs C. Jones of “Morwenna”.

Recommendations: (a) The original Orders made to extinguish and create the paths shown on plan Nos. 1 and 2 be abandoned. (b) An Extinguishment Order be remade to remove Bridleway No. 22 between points A and B and provided no objections are made the Order be confirmed as unopposed but that confirmation be dependant upon ( c ).

(c) A concurrent Public Path Creation Order be made to register a public footpath via the route B-D-E-F and a public bridleway via the route A-B-C and if no objections are received be confirmed as unopposed.

1. Introduction

1.1. This Bridleway has been unavailable for use since the Council enclosed the area with fences in approximately 1977 at the time it first became involved in protecting the dunes. Restoration and stabilisation work is ongoing which would be adversely affected if the route was reopened.

1.2 There are a few paths through the dunes but none coincide with the Definitive Route.

1.3. The Bridleway cannot be accessed at its northern point due to the presence of a stone wall (at Point A as shown on Plan No. 1) built to prevent sand from accumulating on to the footway. The Bridleway terminates at a public footpath (shown at Point B on Plan No. 1) and therefore serves no purpose in that it does not link to any other highway of equal or higher status. Consequently equestrians would not be able to use this Bridleway to reach any other part of Port Eynon south of Point B.

1.4 There is no record of any complaint being received either concerning the lack of access via the Bridleway or that it serves no purpose beyond its termination at a public footpath at Point B.

Background

1.5 The original intention was to extinguish the Bridleway and create a Public Footpath via the beach (shown as A-B-C-D on Plan No. 2). Informal consultations were undertaken on the 8th May 2007 and no objections were received. Consequently the Director of Environment exercised her delegated authority to make a Public Path Creation and Extinguishment Order, the Orders were made and notice of their making published. Four objections were made.

1.6 Once objections are received the Council cannot confirm the Orders. It either must refer the Order to the Planning Inspectorate for determination or withdraw the Order. Under this Council’s Constitution an opposed Order that has been authorised by delegated decision must be reported to the relevant Area Committee and thereafter Cabinet for a decision as to whether to proceed with the Order.

1.7 All objectors were met on site at different meetings in an effort to find a satisfactory alternative. The present proposals shown on Plan No. 3 were agreed with the objectors. Mrs C. Jones of “Morwenna” also agreed as she had objected to the path being re-routed on the seaward side of her property (originally shown C-D or Plan No. 2).

1.8 The purpose of this report is to consider whether to refer the Orders to the Planning Inspectorate for determination or to withdraw those Orders and make another two which should be acceptable to all who have been consulted.

2. Methods Available to the Council to Downgrade A Public Bridleway to a Public Footpath

2.1 At the present time Bridleway No. 22 has been the subject of an Extinguishment Order. The issue is whether the Order can be confirmed.

Current Proposal

2.1 The proposed alternative routes are shown on plan No. 3 and a further Order e made to extinguish the currently registered Bridleway shown on Plan No.1.

2.2 Grounds for Making and Confirming a Public Path Extinguishment Order under Section 118 of the Highways Act 1980

Under paragraph (1) Section 118 to the Highways Act 1980, this Council must decide whether the path or way is needed for public use.

The informal consultation and negotiations have shown that the route of this Bridleway is not required. The Order was made on that basis.

2.3 The second test is whether or not it is expedient to confirm the Order by considering and having regard to:-

(a) The extent the path would, apart from the Order, likely to be used by the public;

(b) The effect the loss of the path would have in respect of land served by the path.

2.4 Case law has established that the confirmation of an Order would not be ruled out even if the path was going to be used by a limited number of persons, if for example there is an equally convenient alternative nearby.

2.5 As already indicated the Bridleway has been unavailable since 1977. No complaints have been received and the two regional representatives of the British Horse Society have agreed to its extinguishment provided an alternative means of access is provided to the beach. In their view access to the beach for riders is the most important reason for keeping a bridleway in this area.

2.6 Given the above, the Extinguishment Order can be justified if the alternatives being offered are considered satisfactory. Given the recent agreement by the objectors one can assume the Order could be confirmed unopposed. However, as the proposed alternatives are now different to those put forward in the earlier Order, the Extinguishment Order will have to be remade to give the public the opportunity to object.

Grounds for Making a Public Path Creation Order under Section 26 of the Highways Act 1980

3.1 This Council has to be satisfied there is a need for the public path and have regard to:-

(a) The extent to which the path should add to the convenience of persons resident in the area;

(b) The effect which the creation of the path or way would have on the rights of person interested in the land, account being taken of the compensation that may be payable.

3.2 As a result of the informal consultations undertaken and the concerns expressed by those who objected, it became apparent that:-

(a) They did not consider creating a public footpath along a beach to be desirable due to its submergence at spring high tides. Secondly, they say they note the gradual loss of sand at Port Eynon beach and are concerned that the route may become stoney and irregular;

(b) That there are a number of informal paths through the dunes and those who objected indicated they did not want to lose the right to walk via that area. In this regard it should be noted that there are already a series of boardwalks between Points D and X (shown on Plan No. 3) contained within the dunes, which is proposed to form part of this proposed alternative;

(c) The representative from the British Horse Society stated there ought to be a defined and legally recognised means of access for riders to the beach. They have agreed to the new position of this proposed Bridleway via B-C on Plan No. 3.

The committees were advised that there is a byelaw which prohibits horseriding from and including the months of May to September between the hours of 0900 and 1700.

Conclusion

4.1 There are sufficient grounds to satisfy the provisions of Section 118 to the Highways Act 1980 to confirm the Order to remove Bridleway No. 22, particularly as an alternative route will be provided for horse riders.

4.2 There are also satisfactory grounds to support the Creation Orders so that the public can use a more suitable route already in existence via the dunes.

Recommended:-

(a) The original Orders made to create and extinguish the path shown on Plan Nos. 1 and 2 be abandoned.

(b) An Extinguishment Order be re-made to remove Bridleway No. 22 betweens Points A and B shown on Plan No. 1 and provided no objections are made the Order be confirmed as unopposed, but that confirmation be dependent on (c).

(c) A concurrent Public Path Creation Order be made to register a public footpath via the route B-D-E-F and a Public Bridleway via the route A - B-C shown on Plan No. 3 and if no objections are received, be confirmed as unopposed.

Background papers:

Row -80

Contact Officer: Mr M.J. Workman Telephone: 636008

PROPOSED CREATION OF A PUBLIC FOOTPATH AND PUBLIC BRIDLEWAY COMMUNITY OF PORT EYNON

A  D B C

X

E

F

Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with Plan No 3 the permission of the controller of HMSO Crown Copyright City and County of Swansea licence no. 100023509 T h e t ot se B C o o e Borfa House ntr (PH) rg o w Fo Ty^ Borfa Caravan Park M e T r C r 14.6m a T h c C r e k e r o r PROPOSED CREATION ld e y fie Maranatha tt Leys Cottage air e F OF A PUBLIC FOOTPATH tag ot Sinks C ardCOMMUNITY OF PORT EYNON lly d Croft Acre ky T o y Ric h Sinks H lw he he e eg rs T T D rr la yes ) a p A a u C o M H um n P 4 F ( e e 1 M e a th s h 1 n lt a T C a n P 8 B i C lo z e o a v e l t r e C C ta le r o o g y C tt e tt a Car Park C o a g o tt g e t a e ta g g e 12.1m A e TCBs PC Dunes B T r a c k

r  e Dunes t a W

h ig P H ath (um n Proposed Public ) a C e Footpath M Scale 1 2500 ) m

u Sand (

h t Dunes a P

Sand Rock Rock and Shingle and Shingle P a t h Dunes ( u mDunes Sand Sand

)

T S ra lip c Dunes w k T a ra y c k

Morwenna P Lime Kiln a t (disused) h e ( l u g m P n i M ) a h t e h S a

( n d u n m H a i ) Old g d h Lifeboat n

Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with House a W S (Youth Hostel) a , the permission of the controller of HMSO t k e Plan No 2 c D r Crown Copyright o City and County of Swansea licence no. R 100023509 Quay Cottage Sea Cottage Rock and Shingle PC Dunes

T PROPOSED EXTINGUISHMENT r a c k OF BRIDLEWAY NO 22

COMMUNITY OF r PORT EYNON A e Dunes t a W

h ig P H ath (um n ) a e M

)

m

u Sand (

h t Dunes a P

Sand Rock Rock and Shingle and Shingle P a t h Dunes ( u m Dunes Sand Sand

)

T S ra lip c Dunes w k T a ra y c k  Morwenna P Lime Kiln a t (disused) h e ( l u g m P n i M ) a h t e h S a

( n d u

n m H a i ) Old g d h Lifeboat n

House a B W S (Youth Hostel) a , t k e c r o

R Exisiting Bridleway No 22 Quay Cottage Community of Port Eynon Sea Cottage Rock and Shingle Rock and Shingle

Salt Sand and Scale 1 2500 Cottage Shingle

Shingle Reproduced from the Ordnance Survey Map with the permission of the controller of HMSO Crown Copyright City and County of Swansea licence no. 100023509 Plan No 1

Quarries (disused) CITY AND COUNTY OF SWANSEA 1. BISHOPSTON DINAS A SIR ABERTAWE 5. COCKETT 7. DUVANT Report of the Head of Planning Services to the 8. FAIRWOOD Chair and Members of the Area 2 Development 9. GORSEINON Control Committee 10. GOWER 11. GOWERTON 12. KILLAY NORTH DATE: 23RD FEBRUARY 2010 13. KILLAY SOUTH 14. KINGSBRIDGE 29 18. LOWER LOUGHOR 20. MAYALS 9 27 23. NEWTON 35 18 24. OYSTERMOUTH 14 25. PENCLAWDD 27. PENLLERGAER 11 28. PENNARD 5 29. PENYRHEOL 25 32. SKETTY 35. UPPER LOUGHOR 7 8 12 36. WEST CROSS

13 32

20 10 36 28 1 23 24

Bryan Graham B.A. (HONS); Dip. T.P.; M.R.T.P.I. Head of Planning Services CONTENTS

ITEM APP. NO. SITE LOCATION OFFICER REC.

1 2009/0995 Eastern Slade Farm Oxwich Swansea SA3 1NA REFUSE Change of Use of part of field from agriculture to camping for a maximum of 10 tented units for weekends and bank holidays from 31st May or Spring Bank Holiday whichever is the earlier until the 2nd weekend in September or 9th September whichever is the later in any year

2 2009/0890 70 Langland Bay Road Langland Swansea SA3 4QR APPROVE Replacement detached dwelling

3 2009/1785 70 Langland Bay Road Langland Swansea SA3 4QR APPROVE Demolition of existing dwelling (application for Conservation Area Consent)

4 2009/1289 Llanrhidian Community Hall, Llanrhidian, Swansea, SA3 APPROVE 1EH Two storey side extension, addition of pitched roof over existing flat roof, external alterations and provision of 7 space car park

5 2009/1271 Compass Coffee Shop, Reynoldston, Swansea, SA3 REFUSE 1AN Change of use from coffee shop (Class A3) and first floor holiday flat (Class C3) to one detached dwelling (Class C3), front canopy, porch and two new accesses

6 2009/1666 The Dingle Horton Swansea SA3 1LB REFUSE Side conservatory

7 2008/0447 Land adjacent to Underhill Cottage, Horton, Swansea, APPROVE SA3 1LQ Detached dwelling

8 2009/0772 Talgarths Well, Middleton, Swansea, SA3 1PJ APPROVE Retention and completion of detached garage with storage area, associated landscaping works and retaining wall

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM APP. NO. SITE LOCATION OFFICER REC.

9 2009/0783 22 Porth Y Waun, Gowerton, Swansea, SA4 3BJ REFUSE Part two part first floor side/front extension and change of use of land to form part of residential curtilage

10 2009/1696 Driftwood, Oxwich, Swansea, SA3 1LS APPROVE Two storey side extension with front and side canopies and external alterations

11 2010/0003 626 Mumbles Road Mumbles Swansea SA3 4EA APPROVE Change of use of ground floor from pottery shop (Class A1) to cafe/restaurant (Class A3)

12 2010/0096 17A Wellfield Bishopston Swansea SA3 3EP REFUSE Increase in ridge height and rear roof extension with juliette balconies to provide living accommodation in roof space

13 2010/0015 Field 3478 Crickton Farm Llanrhidian Swansea SA3 1ED APPROVE Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2010/2011 seasons

14 2010/0017 Field 6362, Great Lunnon Farm Lunnon Swansea APPROVE Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons

15 2010/0018 Field 0785 Stavel Dene, Llanrhidian Swansea APPROVE Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons

16 2010/0020 Field 7429 Little Reynoldston Farm Reynoldston APPROVE Swansea Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 30th September during 2010/2011 seasons

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM APP. NO. SITE LOCATION OFFICER REC.

17 2010/0021 Field 2000, Stembridge Farm, Llanrhidian, Swansea APPROVE Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010/2011 seasons

18 2010/0022 Field 7267, Perriswood Farm, Nicholaston, Swansea APPROVE SA3 2HN Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during 2010/2011 seasons

19 2010/0023 Field 0031, Ivy Cottage Farm, Nicholaston, Swansea APPROVE Use of land for the siting for a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is earliest) to 31st October in 2010/2011 season

20 2010/0024 Field 7924, Blackhills Lane, Fairwood, Swansea APPROVE Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons

21 2010/0025 Field 0050, Eastmoor Farm, Rhossili, Swansea APPROVE Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2010/2011 seasons

22 2010/0026 Field 2872 Mewslade View, Middleton Swansea APPROVE Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons

23 2010/0027 Fields 2463 and 2854, Heatherbrae, Nicholaston, APPROVE Swansea SA3 2HL Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during 2010/2011 seasons

24 2010/0029 Field 0028, Little Hills Farm, Port Eynon, Swansea APPROVE Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM APP. NO. SITE LOCATION OFFICER REC.

25 2010/0030 Field 7608, Sunnyside Farm, Llandewi, Swansea APPROVE Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or the 1st April (which ever is the earlier) to 31st October 2010/2011 season

26 2010/0031 Field 8270, Fairwood Corner Farm, Fairwood, Swansea APPROVE SA2 7LB Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2010/2011 seasons

27 2010/0032 Field 3890, Barraston Hall Farm, Llangennith, Swansea APPROVE Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons

28 2010/0033 Field No. 2746 Orchard Park Farm Llanmadoc Swansea APPROVE SA3 1DE Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2010/2011 seasons

29 2010/0034 Field 2311 Lake Farm House Llandewi Swansea APPROVE Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons

30 2010/0080 The Croft, 3 Priors Town Llangennith, Swansea SA3 APPROVE 1HU Single storey rear extension with first floor living accommodation in the roof space incorporating recessed balcony

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010 AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 1 APPLICATION NO. 2009/0995 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Eastern Slade Farm Oxwich Swansea SA3 1NA Proposal: Change of Use of part of field from agriculture to camping for a maximum of 10 tented units for weekends and bank holidays from 31st May or Spring Bank Holiday whichever is the earlier until the 2nd weekend in September or 9th September whichever is the later in any year Applicant: Mr Eric G Beynon

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

This application was DEFERRED FOR A SITE VISIT at the Area 2 Development Control Committee meeting on 2nd February 2010 to consider the impact of the development on the character of the area. My report has been updated to include further letters of correspondence received and my recommendation of refusal remains unchanged.

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV21 In the countryside non-residential development will only be permitted where it can be demonstrated that it is beneficial for the rural economy, or it meets overriding social or economic local needs, or it is appropriate development associated with farm diversification, sustainable tourism or nature conservation, or it provides an acceptable economic use for brown field land or existing buildings, or it is essential for communications, other utility services, minerals or renewable energy generation. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV2 The siting of new development shall give preference to the use of previously developed land and have regard to the physical character and topography of the site and its surroundings. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 1 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0995

Policy EC21 Improvements to the environmental quality, conditions and facilities will be encouraged within existing camping, touring unit and static caravan sites and small increases in the number of pitches maybe permitted where justified by environmental improvements and where the overalls scale would not be increased. Change to the type of accommodation will only be permitted where there is no adverse impact on the landscape, would bring about environmental improvements and not require extensive additional infrastructure, nor cause harm to the natural heritage. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV27 Development that significantly adversely affects the special interests of sites designated as SSSI's and NNR's will not be permitted unless the need for the development is of such significance that it outweighs the national importance of the designation. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC17 Proposals for tourism and recreation developments of an appropriate scale in locations which relate acceptably to the existing pattern of development and/or their surroundings in terms of the nature of the proposal concerned will be permitted provided they comply with a specified list of criteria including standard of design, effect on landscape and nature conservation, effect of visitor pressure on sensitive locations, provide acceptable and safe access, would not cause a loss of best agricultural land. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

None

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site. EIGHT LETTERS OF OBJECTION, ONE JOINT LETTER OF OBJECTION (with 21 signatures) and 12 LETTERS OF SUPPORT have been received, which are summarised as follows:

OBJECTIONS

1. The applicant states that this application is done with the approval of local residents but the undersigned state that they were never approached by the applicant. 2. We were all pleased with the decision with regards to Greenways Leisure Park with regards to preventing the expansion of caravan and camping sites in the AONB, particularly in coastal locations such as ours. 3. There is an awful mess outside of the current site when the field is too wet for cars and causes obstructions, which will get worse is the application is approved. 4. The site is visible from the farm entrance, a public footpath, and from Port Eynon Bay and Port Eynon point. 5. There is a problem with people straying into our fields neighbouring the site. 6. The applicant should be applying for permission at Slade Farm not Eastern Slade Farm which is owned by my husband and his father. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 1 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0995

7. Oxwich has more than its fair share of campsites and the problems of water supply, sewerage disposal and the dangerous steep hill from Oxwich still pertain and believe that we have reached saturation point in Oxwich Green. 8. What is meant by a unit? 9. I have concerns about the extra traffic that this would incur. 10. The problems with cars needing to be towed from the field in wet weather would be compounded. 11. The growth from 20 tents and caravans to 40 camping pitches is not sustainable in an AONB. 12. Doubling the capacity does not constitute overspill and there is no need for overspill as there are 400 camping pitches available at Greenways. 13. I am concerned that the next application will be for a toilet block. 14. The issue of additional fields would further extend the unnatural character of the countryside and cause harm to the quality of the landscape. 15. I am subjected to any noise and traffic pollution and do not want to see an increase in these problems. 16. The application itself is confusing by applying for units rather than tents. 17. We are opposed to any extension to caravanning or camping in our small rural community. 18. The fields can be seen from the footpath to Eastern Slade Farm and from the footpath leading past Sealands and is not screened as indicated by the applicant. 19. Granting an extension to the site would conflict with the views expressed by the Highways Authority and the recent inquiry result. We assume that the term units include touring vans and camper vans. 20. Touring and motor caravans would be detrimental to highway safety and convenience for all road users but I would be supportive of tent overspill for Bank Holiday periods.

SUPPORT

1. We have always found the site to be well maintained and well organised in terms of site allocation and the number of people allowed in. 2. Since the new field is further from the road and local residences, it would not caused any extra disruption or noise and spreading the campers over a wider area would ease the wear and tear on the fields. 3. We appreciate that a balance has to be drawn up so that the beauty we all wish to enjoy is not destroyed but this site does not have the impact of rows and rows of static caravans. If this application provides a revenue stream to help this working farm survive it will be a positive thing for the future. 4. We should be supporting this sort of family run tourism particularly at a time when we are encouraging more people to take their holidays locally. 5. The additional space will reduce crowding and as the camping season is so short, makes sense for a few more visitors to be able to enjoy the beautiful Gower coast. 6. The acceptance of this application will assist farming in a way that does no long term damage to the landscape or land.

The Gower Society – Objects:

1. The camping/caravan site has had numbers well over its permission for the last couple of years; this Society and others have made repeated complaints about this illegality and the excessive number of units on site. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 1 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0995

2. The existing field is licensed for a maximum of 20 units of which no more that 5 may be touring vans and the remainder tents. This application doubles the quantity; it is not clear if the application is purely for tents, or for tents and caravans, or indeed tents, caravans and camper vans. We question what is a unit in this situation? Any approval for any site should specify the type of unit (e.g. touring caravan, camper van, tent or static caravan). If this is not done it could lead to some confusion and Appeals in the future. 3. The UDP refers to a maximum of 10% overspill in cases where there is a proven need, where the units are on the same field and where the existing facilities are sufficient. This application is for 100% increase with no proven need, in a separate filed and without evidence that the existing facilities are sufficient. 4. The proposed field shown on the plan is larger than the existing field, and if past experience is anything to go by, it will be filled rather than partially used for overspill. 5. There is no designated period for which the application refers to i.e. 2009 or 2010 and for how many years. 6. Access to and into this site is difficult and tortuous and totally inadequate for any increased numbers of vehicle movements. Two of the reasons why the recent Greenways Appeal, decision dated 23/03/09) failed was on the grounds of inadequate access as well as impact upon the landscape of the AONB. 7. We would wish to refer to para. 49 of the Appeal Inspectors report mentioned above where he emphasises the inadequacy, of the road for touring caravans. 8. It is very much against the UDP to allow such an increase particularly when the recent Greenways Public Inquiry has re-iterated the fact that there are 258 camping spacers at Greenways Holiday park at Oxwich Green. There is no need for such an extension when a large number of serviced pitches are readily available just up the road. 9. This site is already highly conspicuous, intrusive for close neighbours and is could be said to be badly managed, in view of the illegal number that have been allowed in recent years. 10. The applicant has claimed that the sit supports a number of jobs. This is clearly spurious as small low-key sites like this, without full facilities, are not labour intensive and should involve only a couple of hours per day. 11. We also understand that the applicant has stated that the neighbours have all been consulted and are supportive. This is not true; most are certainly not supportive.

To allow this increase would make an absolute mockery of the decision following the Greenways Public Inquiry earlier in the year. It would also drive a coach and horses through the current regulations governing such small sites in the Gower AONB i.e. it would set a most dangerous precedent.

Pennard Community Council – Objects:

A meeting was held to consider the planning application at Eastern Slade farm. The applicant spoke at the meeting and advised that the application was for tents even though on the form it says units. The Council have always considered units to mean tents and also touring caravans, camper vans and any other mobile camping unit. The applicant agreed to re-submit the application to clearly state tens to replace the word unit, so that the application is precise in the wording used to ensure there is no discrepancy in the future. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 1 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0995

Due to concerns that were expressed during the recent applications made by the nearby Greenways leisure Park and subsequent appeal, the greatest concern was the difficulty that caravans had when passing on Oxwich Hill. The Planning Inspector also agreed with this concern and was one of the reasons that the Greenways appeal was unsuccessful.

Penrice Community Council – Amended Comments “The Penrice Community Council considered this application again at its meeting on 16th September 2009 following advice that the applicant had submitted an e-mail to confirm that the application was only for 20 tents to be used as an overspill. The Council in view of this new information did not object to the application if it is to be for tents only.”

Penrice Community Council – two further letters received:

1. The first requesting that Committee Members have sight of the local letters of objection so that they are aware of the local feeling of opposition to the application 2. Second letter raises an objection below: “The Council decided previously that there was no objection to the original application made by Eastern Slade Farm. Council is aware that this application has changed from 20 units to 10 details as above. Following the previous meeting and decision, Council received 17 letters of objection from local residents highlighting various problems that had been experienced at this site, over the last few years that the Council was not aware of prior to its original decision. Copies of these letters are enclosed. Also the Council has been made aware that this application does not comply with the policies within the UDP. Concern was raised if this was permitted, an undesirable precedent would be set in an AONB. The Council now wish to object to the amended application due to the reasons above.”

Highways Observations – This application is for the provision of an extended camping facility at Eastern Slade Farm, Oxwich. The applicant proposes 20 additional camping pitches.

Detailed consideration was given to the access road known locally as Oxwich Hill, during a recent Public Inquiry. The inadequacies of the road were considered in relation to an appeal at Greenways for an increase in camping and touring caravan use. The appeal was subsequently dismissed on highway grounds due to conflict between towed caravans.

In this instance the use is for camping, where access is gained predominantly by cars, although some trailer tents may wish to use the facility, however this type of combination is not that common and unlikely to form a significant proportion of those using the site. National data suggests that for 20 camping pitches traffic movements will be minimal, amounting to approximately 5 movements at the peak time of 1000-1100, which is not the network peak time when residential traffic is at it worst.

The road leading to the site cannot easily accommodate the passing of vehicles as there are a number of restricted sections and few passing places which are not inter-visible. However, this situation is already present and the predicted additional traffic movements are unlikely to add significantly to this.

I recommend that on balance, no highway objections are raised for an additional 20 camping pitches as applied for. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 1 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0995

AMENDED PLANS (where the size of the field area to be used is reduced and the number of tented units reduced to 10 and only to be used as overspill for weekend and Bank Holidays from Spring Bank Holiday to 2nd week in September).

The application was advertised on site and twenty one individuals were consulted. FORTY FIVE LETTERS OF OBJECTION have been received, whose comments mainly reflect those previously submitted but also:

1. Proposals conflict with the Unitary Development Plan. The increase would be 50%. 2. Even one tent in the field will open the floodgates. 3. There is adequate space at Greenways. 4. The proposal would be harmful to the AONB and SSSI. 5. Extra pitches could be accommodated within the existing field. 6. Application in unenforceable as no Council staff work on weekends or Bank Holidays and there is a history of flouting the licence. The proposed field could hold up to 100 units. 7. Concerned that a further portaloo will follow.

The Gower Society – Still object.

1. The only redeeming feature of this application is the limitation to Bank Holiday/weekend periods within a limited number of months. 2. However, we view this application with a jaundiced air as this site is at present is totally unable to police itself and to adhere to the permission it already has for 20 units. 3. If allowed, what guarantee would there be that it would adhere to any new numbers/permissions? What sanctions would be applied to any deviation from permission? Without strictly imposed conditions, we are unable to support any permission for an increase in numbers. 4. This proposal is against the local authority’s self determined UDP policy which does not allow for any increase in camping permissions/new fields. There is no need for such an increase on this site as Greenways Oxwich site has more than enough vacant pitches to supply local demand. 5. We would suggest that any alteration in numbers, if allowed, be based on the following: No increase in the number of caravans at any time, a small increase in the number of tents, say from 15 to 20 maximum, that this increase is kept to the existing field for which there is camping permission, that there is no permission to extend the site into another field. 6. This site is visible in the AONB – any permission given should not compromise the AONB. 7. If any extension of permission be granted this must be stipulated as tents only.

APPLICANT’S STATEMENT

“Our licence is for 5 caravans/motor homes or camper vans. However, the only caravans we now take in are those that have previously been to our site over the years as we feel that the nature of the roads and inexperience in some drivers cause a lot of problems on our narrow roads throughout the summer months.

I can stress that the overspill, if we obtain planning permission, will only be used for tents.” AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 1 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0995

APPLICANT’S ADDITIONAL STATEMENT

“Eastern Slade Farm has been in the same family for over 105 years, we are currently working as a dairy farm in approximately 60 acres owned and 50 acres rented. The youngest generation (Tom, Jack and Harry Beynon) will be the fifth generation looking to carry on the farming tradition.

The current unsettled economic climate makes farming extremely hard and with dairy farmers leaving the industry on an average of 2 per day the future for our children seems insecure. As farmers we are constantly told to think of new ways to diversify and as the tourism industry in Gower expands this seems to be the way forward. We strive to be excellent guardians of our countryside but this costs us money to maintain our beautiful surroundings. Once in Gower there were 35 working dairy farms now sadly we are one of just five remaining.

Our small campsite has been running for over sixty years but the last ten years has seen the trend for camping increase and we feel there is a need to expand our site albeit on a small scale, we are farmers first and foremost with our next generation eager to follow in their ancestor’s footsteps. The site will remain small and basic which denotes the feedback we have been getting from people who have enjoyed the whole experience of being in tune with nature.

Our client base is from an extremely broad spectrum, from walkers, climbers, bird spotters, naturalist and families who want to remove their children from every day life and confinements of televisions, computers and play stations. We allow people to explore the surroundings and animal life, children are encouraged to visit the farm and see what actually happens on a dairy farm. Some children and parents have been lucky enough to witness the birth of a calf, children have been able to milk a cow something they wouldn’t have the opportunity to do normally and something that we as a family take so much for granted. Parents are able to relax while their children enjoy the environment and make new friends.

One father told me that his children’s two-week holiday had been something out of Swallows and Amazon and a wonderful experience for the whole family. They caught their own seafood, learnt to milk a cow, saw life being born they had learnt so much, which is not on any school curriculum.

I take pride in the fact that so many people come back year after year and stay for long periods of time, we run the site efficiently and that will not change. The site is very much run by myself and my three boys who enjoy sharing experiences with children from completely different backgrounds, and they enjoy showing children how life on a farm is and how hard it can be being on call 24 hours a day seven days a week.

This year has been extremely busy for us and in one week in the summer I turned away over 100 enquiries by phone and emails from people wanting to stay at my site because it is small and basic. More and more people want smaller sites with limited facilities and there just isn’t enough similar sites available. I was interviewed by Dixe Wills this summer who is a writer for the Guardian Newspaper and author of the Cool camping books, he is compiling another book called “Basic Campsite one acre and under” due to be published in April 2010, his research showed that sites similar to Eastern Slade are very few, three in the whole of Southwest Wales. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 1 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0995

My busiest periods are weekends, bank holidays and school holidays and if granted the overspill will help reduce the number of people who camp illegally in the area, as they have nowhere else to go, as they are unhappy about staying in the larger commercial sites, where there are too many distractions and noise.

The small revenue that our site generates is all ploughed back into the farm we do not take any wages from this income and our campers feel they are supporting a very desperate farming industry. The best thing we feel is that at the end of a busy summer the existing field reverts back into an agricultural field and no trace of a campsite is visible. Which is why people keep returning back to Eastern Slade”.

APPLICANT’S FURTHER STATEMENT

“After much discussion we would like to be able to resubmit our planning application for ten tents only for weekends (Friday and Saturday nights) and bank holidays (including Sunday night) only and from the period from Spring Bank Holiday (last bank holiday in May) until the second weekend in September inclusive.

The ten tents would be pitched behind the hedge with cars parked alongside each tent to allow privacy for each unit.”

APPLICANT’S ADDITIONAL STATEMENT

The applicant raises concerns about the letters of objection received and indicating that 4 letters from people with the same surname have been written in the same hand writing, there are 2 letters from an address in the village where the individuals don’t live at the address making a mockery of the process. “We understand that local residents are concerned about the ability to monitor and enforce any planning permission on bank holidays and weekends as there are no official council workers working. Mr Bowen states in his letter that he will be monitoring the site carefully. We would be very foolish to breech the licence if approved and receive an enforcement notice and possible a large fine”.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Full planning permission is now sought for the use of part of field 8878 at Eastern Slade Farm, Oxwich for overspill camping for up to 10 tented units for weekends and Bank Holidays from 31st May or Spring Bank Holiday (whichever is the earlier) to the second weekend in September or 9th September, whichever is the later in any year. The number of units proposed has been reduced from 20 units originally applied for.

Eastern Slade farm is a working farm which supplements its income by providing camping on field 8592 for up to 20 units. In this case the term “unit” comprises of tents and a maximum of 5 caravans/motor homes/camper vans. This use has taken place for many years and is well established. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 1 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0995

The main issue for consideration in this instance is the impact of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, impact upon the residential amenities of neighbouring residents and highway safety having regard to prevailing Unitary Development Plan policies. It is not considered that the provisions of the Human Rights Act raise any other overriding considerations.

Within the Gower AONB the primary objective of this designation is the preservation of the natural beauty of the area. This is further underlined by National planning policy guidance, Planning Policy Wales 2002, which emphasises that development control decisions affecting the AONB should respect this primary objective and favour the conservation of natural beauty and protect the character and appearance of the AONB from inappropriate development. With regards to the provision and extension of caravan and camping sites, TAN 13, states that “new and extended sites should be effectively screened and planted so as not to be visually intrusive. Sites should not as a rule be allowed immediately by the sea but should be set back a short distance inland where they are not visible from or along the coast.”

In line with this guidance, the following policies of the Swansea Unitary Development Plan apply. Policy EV2 seeks to ensure high quality development that protects the natural heritage of the area and Policies EV22 and EV26 of the Unitary Development Plan primarily seek to protect the landscape of the Gower AONB for its own sake and to preserve it for future generations, with particular emphasis on preserving its natural beauty.

Policy EC21 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 outlines criteria against which proposals for developments at existing caravan, touring unit and camping sites. It states that:

1. Small increases in the number of pitches may be permitted where justified in the context of environmental improvements and where it would not significantly increase overall scale of the operation. 2. Material changes to the type of accommodation provided will only be permitted where; a. There will be no adverse impact on the landscape b. The change would bring about environmental improvements, would not require additional infrastructure and services and would result in overall benefit to the character and appearance of the area in cases of limited change to static caravan pitches or to chalets. c. There would be no harm to natural heritage d. It is subject to a condition ensuring holiday occupancy.

This policy seeks to encourage improvements to the quality of existing sites for the benefit of visitors and to reduce their visual impact on the landscape. Whilst small increases may be permitted, in the amplification to this policy the Unitary Development Plan indicates that a “small increase” would not be greater than 10% of unit numbers or site area, and less in some cases and any increase would also be dependent on the suitability of utilising an existing strong physical boundary to contain the site, particularly at prominent coastal locations.

Policy EC17 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 refers to rural tourism and ensures that new tourism and recreation development is consistent with the primary objective of preserving the AONB. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 1 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0995

It states that tourism and recreation developments of an appropriate scale in locations which relate acceptably to the existing pattern of development and/or their surroundings in terms of the nature of the proposal concerned will be permitted provided they:-

i. are in keeping with the scale and character of the surrounding area ii. do not have significant adverse effects on landscape or nature conservation interests iii. do not create a significantly harmful level of visitor pressure at sensitive locations iv. can provide safe access for a variety of modes of transport without harming the character of adjacent lanes v. and when located on a farm would not lead to the loss of the best and most versatile agricultural land.

In this respect it should be recognized that the onus of proof is on the applicant to demonstrate how the proposal meets these criteria. No information has been submitted to illustrate how the proposal would broaden the range of accommodation available thus meeting a need to provide a greater range and quality of unserviced accommodation. It is merely an extension of an existing use. Policy EC21 allows for the provision of small overspill sites for short periods of time and should be a short term measure only, but the proposal states that the overspill would be used from 31st May (or Spring Bank Holiday weekend) to the second weekend of September (or 9th September at the latest) in any year for weekends and Bank Holidays within this time.

The site which has already been in use as an overspill site, is located closer to the cliff edge than the existing field and the intention of Policy EC21 is to essentially move development away from the coastline. In addition, the introduction of another 10 tents at this location would still significantly increase the scale of the existing operation, contrary to the requirements of Policy EC21 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008.

In terms of its impact on the character and appearance of the area, the field lies within a generally open landscape visible from public vantage points, and it is considered that it would represent a significantly harmful visual intrusion upon the coastline at this location and be detrimental to the generally rural/coastal character of the landscape. As the site lies within a larger field which is used by the applicant outside of the holiday season, it would not be possible for the site to be screened to reduce the visual impact, prevent any further encroachment into the field and ensure containment of the development.

Moreover, it is considered that the approval of this application would create an undesirable precedent for applications of a similar nature, which cumulatively would result in an adverse impact upon the sensitive landscape qualities and character of the AONB.

With regards to residential amenity, it is acknowledged that another ten tents would increase activity at the site. However, as the field is approximately 70m from the nearest neighbouring residents who would be most affected, it is not considered that any noise or disturbance would be so significant as to warrant a recommendation of refusal on this issue alone. Many objectors have referred to the recent appeal decision at Greenways Holiday Park which involved changing the use of the fields from tented use to a use that included touring caravans, camper vans and dormobiles. The Inspector dismissed the appeal making specific reference to the unsuitability of Oxwich Hill for vehicles with wider towed caravans. However, the current application only refers to tents and as such differs from the dismissed scheme at Greenways. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 1 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0995

Indeed, in terms of congestion or danger on the roadway, the Head of Transportation and Engineering has raised no highway objection to the proposal as the proposal is for tents only and this part of the proposal is considered to satisfy this criterion.

With regards to the additional letters received from Penrice Community Council, the letters sent to them have already been received by the LPA and a summary of the objections have been included in the report.

In conclusion and for the reasons outlined above the proposal, even with the reduced number of tented units, is still considered to constitute an unjustified form of development at this coastal location within the open countryside which would have a seriously detrimental effect on the character, appearance and natural beauty of this part of the Gower AONB. It is considered that there are no material considerations which would outweigh the provisions of the Development Plan and it is further considered that approval of this application would establish an undesirable precedent for the consideration of applications of a similar nature the cumulative effect of which would be a serious erosion of the character, appearance and natural beauty of the Gower AONB.

RECOMMENDATION

REFUSE for the following reasons:

1 The proposal would represent an unjustified and inappropriate form of development at this sensitive location within the open countryside, which would have a seriously detrimental impact on the character, appearance and natural beauty of the this part of the Gower AONB. The proposal therefore fails to accord with Policies EV2, EC21, EV22 and EV26 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008.

2 The proposal if approved, would create a precedent for proposals of a similar nature, the cumulative impact of which would be seriously detrimental to the visual amenities of the Gower AONB and prejudice the Council's overall planning policies which seek to resist inappropriate tourism developments. The proposal therefore fails to accord with Policies EC21, EV2, EV22 and EV26 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EV2, EV17, EV21, EV22, EV26, EV27

PLANS

Amended site location plan received 24th November 2009

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 2 APPLICATION NO. 2009/0890 WARD: Newton Area 2

Location: 70 Langland Bay Road Langland Swansea SA3 4QR Proposal: Replacement detached dwelling Applicant: Mr Robert Neale

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

This application was DEFERRED FOR A SITE VISIT at the AREA 2 Development Control Committee on the 2nd February 2009 in order to assess the impact of the development given the concerns expressed about the demolition of the existing building and its proposed replacement, however my recommendation of approval remains the same.

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV1 New development shall accord with a defined set of criteria of good design. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

Policy EV2 The siting of new development shall give preference to the use of previously developed land and have regard to the physical character and topography of the site and its surroundings. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

Policy EV9 Development within or adjacent to a Conservation Area will only be permitted if it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area or its setting. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV3 Proposals for new development and alterations to and change of use of existing buildings will be required to meet defined standards of access. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy HC2 Housing development within the urban area will be supported where the site has been previously developed, its development does not conflict with other policies, does not result in ribbon development, and the coalescence of settlements, overintensive development, loss of residential amenity, adverse effect on the character and appearance of the area, loss of urban green space, harm to highway safety, adverse effects to landscape, natural heritage, security and personal safety, infrastructure capacity, and the overloading of community facilities and services. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 2 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0890

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2009/1785 Demolition of existing dwelling (application for Conservation Area Consent) Decision: Grant Cons Area Consent Conditional Decision Date: 02/02/2010

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

Neighbours: This application was advertised on site and in the press as Development within a Conservation Area and two neighbouring dwellings were individually consulted. No letters of response were received.

Mumbles Community Council: Out of keeping with existing houses. Very modern style. In wrong situation and Conservation Area. Possible removal of trees to the rear.

Highways: This proposed replacement dwelling includes a large garage that will accommodate at least 4 cars. There will be no adverse affect on local highway safety conditions or any parking implications as a result of the proposal and I therefore recommend that no highway objections are raised.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Anthony Colburn.

Full planning permission is sought for a replacement contemporary style dwelling at No 70 Langland Bay Road. The existing property is a two storey detached dwelling. The property falls within both the settlement of Langland and the Langland Bay Conservation Area. The application site is prominent in the western finger of development with a green back cloth that stretches towards the golf club. It forms part of a ribbon of detached dwellings, all different, including bungalows, two storey houses – some of which have flat roofs.

Langland Bay is characterised by large detached dwellings widely spaced and set in the hillside amongst a backcloth of mature deciduous woodland which is protected by Tree Preservation Orders. This serves to lend a special semi-rural air to the area. The coastal area lies within the designated Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), and is also a part of the Heritage Coast. It is the most intensely used coastal tourist and recreation area in Gower offering a varied seascape of fine sandy bays and limestone rock. Langland Bay’s special character and appearance are due to this combination of fine coastal scenery, accessible sandy beaches and a relatively un-commercialised seafront, epitomised by the extensive bathing-hut sites. This small but popular seaside resort is visually ‘framed’ by the mature woodland which forms the backcloth to the bay. The gradation from sea to sand, promenade to beach-hut, hotels and flats to residential area above within the woodland setting, allows the resort to nestle within the bay rather than dominate it. “Green” areas still predominate visually; buildings, with a few exceptions, remain subservient. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 2 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0890

The main issues for consideration during the determination of this application are the impact of the development upon the visual amenity of the Langland Bay Conservation Area and the surrounding area, the impact upon the residential amenities of the neighbouring dwellings and highway safety having regard for the policies of the Swansea UDP. It is not considered that the provisions of the Human Rights Act raise any further additional issues.

Policy EV1, to which Policy HC2 is cross referenced, states that where there is scope; design should seek to improve the built environment. This also needs to be considered in the context of the Strategic objectives of the Plan, which amongst other things seek to upgrade the visual environment and image of the area, promote locally distinct, innovative design sensitive to the location and setting and to protect the countryside from development that would cause material harm.

Although the area lies within the Conservation Area there is no prevailing characteristic or dominant house type to suggest a specific architectural response on this site. In terms of the principle of development Conservation Area Policy EV9 seeks to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area or its setting. UDP Policy HC2 relates specifically to infill development within the built environment which allows for housing development where it can be demonstrated that the proposal would not involve overintensive development, ribbon development, a significant loss of residential amenity, significant adverse effect on the character and appearance of the area, the loss of important urban greenspace and an unacceptable impact upon highway safety. This policy is intended to avoid the erection of inappropriate new housing development that detracts from the character of the area. At the same time it is paramount that any new dwelling within a Conservation Area achieves a high quality design that responds to, protects and enhances the inherent qualities of the area whilst also respecting the residential amenity of surrounding properties. The site is also near the Gower AONB boundary and as such consideration must also be given to the impact on the wider area under Policy EV26.

Although the existing dwelling is a component of the identified character and it is in good condition, it is not of any special architectural merit. There is no objection to the principle of redevelopment subject to the acceptability and quality of the proposed replacement dwelling. The proposed replacement dwelling follows the established building line, the scale follows the existing eaves and the top floor is set back and in from the sides, and treated in a different material to make reference to a roof structure and create a top to the building. Although it is slightly wider on the eastern side, there is still a good sense of spacing to the adjacent dwellings. Overall the layout, scale and massing all preserve the character of the Conservation Area and the wider Gower AONB impact is acceptable.

The appearance is contemporary which references traditional modernist seaside dwellings. The use of white render also reflects the existing dwelling and others in the Conservation Area. The flat roof is an integral element of the design. Although the proposed dwelling is deeper this will not be highly visible and therefore would not detract from the Conservation Area, nor does it negatively impact on the adjacent properties. Overall it is considered that the proposed design adds interest and quality to the Conservation Area. It is significant to note that Planning Policy Wales 2002 advises that Local Planning Authorities should not attempt to impose a particular architectural taste or style arbitrarily and should avoid inhibiting opportunities for innovative design solutions. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 2 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0890

Turning to residential amenity, the proposed dwelling respects the building line of the existing house and the eaves level of the new flat roof respects the eaves level of the existing pitched roof. The proposed penthouse is set in from the front roof plane in a similar position to the existing hipped roof in order to reduce the physical nature of the proposed dwelling upon the neighbouring properties. The width of the proposed dwelling is comparable to the existing dwelling and given the topography of the site to the rear which rises steeply and the separation distances from the neighbouring properties it is not considered that the proposal would result in an unacceptable overbearing impact over and above the existing dwelling and as such in this respect the proposal is considered acceptable.

In terms of overlooking no windows are proposed on the side and rear elevations at garage level and lower ground level and the front elevation windows will not overlook the neighbouring properties. As such it is not considered these elements of the scheme raise any overlooking issues. In terms of the ground floor fenestration, again it is not considered that the front elevation windows raise any additional overlooking issues and the decked area will not allow overlooking into the private amenity space of the neighbouring properties and will only overlook garden areas which are within the public domain and as such these elements are considered acceptable. Turning to the flank elevation windows it is considered that overlooking from these windows can be mitigated against by implementing the boundary treatment indicated on the plans.

With regard the 1st floor plan the front facing fenestration will overlook land which is within the public domain and as such will raise no new overlooking issues over and above what was previously approved. Turning to the balcony and French doors serving bedrooms 3 and 4 and the study window, due to the rising land levels to the rear the proposed window and balcony would be set significantly lower than the boundaries with the neighbouring dwellings and as such will not raise unacceptable overlooking issues. With regard the balcony and French doors in the side elevation serving the proposed sitting room, whilst the window will overlook the front garden of No 68 Langland Road, this land is not private and is already within view from the public and as such is not considered unacceptable. The side balcony on the other hand will enjoy oblique views into the rear of No 68 Langland Road and as such a condition requiring a privacy screen is considered appropriate in order to overcome overlooking concerns.

Turning to the 2nd floor plan, the front facing elevation windows serving the master bedroom and front decked area will overlook land within the public realm and as such will not introduce new overlooking issues over and above what is currently experienced. The rear pool and timber decked area will not raise new overlooking issues due to the rising land levels to the rear and their siting at a lower level than the boundaries with the neighbouring properties. The proposal incorporates quite a large flat roof the majority of which on the east and west elevations will not be accessible and as such will not be usable residential amenity space and subject to a condition preventing its use will not result in unacceptable overlooking. With regard the windows situated within the flank elevations, all windows in these elevations either serve non-habitable rooms or are secondary windows and as such can be conditioned fixed shut and obscurely glazed in order to overcome concerns relating to overlooking. As such it is considered that the proposal represents an acceptable form of development which respects the residential amenities of the neighbouring properties, in compliance with Policies EV1 and HC2 of the Swansea UDP. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 2 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0890

The proposed redevelopment is considered acceptable at this location and would, it is considered, enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and add interest and additional variety to the street-scene. It would be necessary, however, to impose a condition on the respective Conservation Area Consent application that the demolition of the building is not commenced before a contract for the redevelopment of the site has been signed.

In terms of highway safety, having consulted the Head of Transportation and Engineering, there are no objections to the proposed replacement dwelling.

Notwithstanding the above, one letter of objection has been received from the Community Council largely raising concerns relating to the proposals impact upon the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. These issues have been addressed in the main body of my report. Concern has been raised to the potential loss of trees to the rear, however having consulted the Council’s Tree Preservation Officer it is considered that whilst the proposal proposes removing and replanting some specimen trees at the front and replanting following completion, plus the removal of small trees towards the rear, none of these are protected by TPO and therefore can see no reasonable reason for recommending refusal. Although the trees are within the Conservation Area such that a Section 211 Notice is normally required for removal, this would not be required should full planning consent be granted.

In summary the replacement dwelling demonstrates that a contemporary idiom can inform a sensitive, contextual approach to redeveloping this site. The design incorporates modern forms and materials to create a dwelling that respects the character and appearance of the immediate Conservation Area and wider area whilst also offering modern, flexible accommodation for its occupants. Therefore it is considered that the development complies with the principles of Policies EV1, EV2, EV3, HC2, EV26 and EV9 of the Swansea Unitary Development Plan. Approval of planning permission is therefore recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 The development shall be commenced not later than the expiration of 5 years from the date of this planning permission and shall be completed in accordance with the said application plans and conditions prior to any part thereof being brought into beneficial use, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1990 and to ensure that the development is completed in accordance with the plans approved by the City and County of Swansea, and so avoid any detriment to amenity or public safety by works remaining uncompleted.

2 Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995, (or any Order revoking or amending that Order), Classes A, B, C, D and E of Schedule 2 shall not apply. Reason: The development hereby approved is such that the Council wish to retain control over any future development being permitted in order to ensure that a satisfactory form of development is achieved at all times. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 2 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0890

3 Samples of all external finishes shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority in writing before the development is commenced. The scheme shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity.

4 All windows in the east and west elevations serving the second floor except those serving the master bedroom, as indicated on the approved plans shall be obscure glazed, and unopenable except for a fan light and shall be retained as such unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To safeguard the privacy of the occupiers of neighbouring residential properties.

5 This permission specifically excludes the use of the flat roof areas, indicated on the approved plans as gravel roof finish and for maintenance access only, as a roof terrace, roof garden or amenity area unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interest of residential amenity.

6 Before the development hereby permitted is first brought into beneficial use a 2m high privacy screen shall be erected on the balcony serving the sitting room along the east facing boundary facing No. 68 Langland Bay Road, in accordance with details to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The boundary screening shall thereafter be maintained in the condition as approved unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interest of residential amenity.

7 Before the development hereby permitted is occupied, the means of enclosing the boundaries of the site shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The means of enclosure shall also be erected prior to occupation and thereafter retained as such. Reason: In the interest of privacy protection.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: (EV1, EV2, EV3, EV9, EV26 and HC2)

2 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

3 Bats may be present. All British bat species are protected under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and are listed in Schedule 2 of the Conservation (Natural Habitats & c.) Regulations 1994. This legislation implements the EC Habitats & Species Directive in the UK making it an offence to capture, kill or disturb a European Protected Species or to damage or destroy the breeding site or resting place of such an animal. It is also an offence to recklessly / intentionally to disturb such an animal. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 2 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0890

If evidence of bats is encountered during site clearance, work should cease immediately and the advice of the Countryside Council for Wales sought before continuing with any work (01792 634960).

4 Birds may be present in the roof of this building please note it is an offence under the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) to intentionally (intentionally or recklessly for Schedule 1 birds) to: - Kill, injure or take any wild bird - Take, damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird while that nest in use or being built - Take or destroy an egg of any wild bird Care should be taken when working on buildings particularly during the bird nesting season March-August.

PLANS

Site location plan, PL01 location plan, PL02 existing site plan, PL03 existing floor plan, PL04 section 1, PL05 existing site section 2, PL06 existing street elevation, PL07 existing site survey, lower ground and ground floor plans, PL16 proposed sectional elevation 5 and 6, PL17 proposed sectional elevation 7, PL21 proposed north elevation received 30th June 2009. Amended plans: PL08 Rev A, PL09 Rev A, PL10 Rev A, PL11 Rev A, PL12 Rev A, PL13 Rev A, PL14 Rev A, PL15 Rev A, PL18 Rev A, PL19 Rev A and PL20 Rev A dated 16th September 2009.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 3 APPLICATION NO. 2009/1785 WARD: Newton Area 2

Location: 70 Langland Bay Road Langland Swansea SA3 4QR Proposal: Demolition of existing dwelling (application for Conservation Area Consent) Applicant: Mr Robert Neale

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

This application was DEFERRED FOR A SITE VISIT at the AREA 2 Development Control Committee on the 2nd February 2009 in order to assess the impact of the development given the concerns expressed about the demolition of the existing building and its proposed replacement, however my recommendation of approval remains the same.

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV10 Demolition of unlisted buildings that contribute to the character or appearance of a Conservation Area will not be granted unless fully justified. (City and County of Swansea & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2009/0890 Replacement detached dwelling Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 02/02/2010

2009/0890 Being considered and on this agenda for decision.

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

Neighbours: Two neighbouring dwellings were individually consulted and the application was advertised on site and in the press as Demolition of an existing dwelling in a Conservation Area. ONE LETTER OF OBJECTION was received which is summarised below:

1. Replacement house shows no sensitivity to the surrounding houses. 2. The prominent position of 70 Langland Bay Road would totally destroy the unity of the architectural landscape. 3. The house is an example of Modernist architecture which should be preserved for future generations and so that a precedent is not set for the wholesale destruction of a much loved landscape.

Mumbles Community Council – Objection. This is the only Art Deco design house in Langland Bay and no reasons have been given for its demolition. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 3 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1785

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Anthony Colburn.

Conservation Area Consent is sought for the demolition of the existing dwelling at 70 Langland Bay Road, Langland, Swansea. The current dwelling is of no special architectural merit and it is considered that its demolition would not detract from the overall character and appearance of the Conservation Area.

Langland Bay Conservation Area is characterised by large detached dwellings widely spaced and set in the hillside amongst a backcloth of mature deciduous woodland which is protected by Tree Preservation Orders. This serves to lend a special semi-rural air to the area. The coastal area lies within the designated Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB), and is also a part of the Heritage Coast. It is the most intensely used coastal tourist and recreation area in Gower offering a varied seascape of fine sandy bays and limestone rock. Langland Bay’s special character and appearance are due to this combination of fine coastal scenery, accessible sandy beaches and a relatively uncommercialised seafront, epitomised by the extensive bathing-hut sites. This small but popular seaside resort is visually ‘framed’ by the mature woodland which forms the backcloth to the bay. The gradation from sea to sand, promenade to beach-hut, hotels and flats to residential area above within the woodland setting, allows the resort to nestle within the bay rather than dominate it. “Green” areas still predominate visually; buildings, with a few exceptions, remain subservient.

Planning Application Ref: 2009/0890 is also reported to this Committee for decision and is a detailed proposal for the redevelopment of the site with a replacement contemporary dwelling house, which is being considered on a ‘one for one’ basis. The existing dwelling does not make any significant contribution to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and the new dwelling would be situated predominately on the same footprint as the existing dwelling which has been designed to respect the scale, character and form of the existing development within the landscape and Conservation Area. The proposed redevelopment is considered acceptable at this location and would present an opportunity to enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area, the Gower AONB and Langland Bay’s character in line with Policy EV10 of the Swansea UDP.

It would be necessary, however, to impose a condition that the demolition of the building is not commenced before a contract for the redevelopment of the site has been signed.

Notwithstanding the above, two letters of objection has been received largely raising concerns relating to the impact upon the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and the wider area and potential precedent for further demolition. However, the majority of these concerns, apart from those associated with the impact of the demolition upon the character and appearance of the Conservation Area are not material to this application for Conservation Area Consent because they relate largely to and are addressed as part of the replacement dwelling application (Ref: 2009/0890). AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 3 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1785

In response to the additional letter of objection from the Mumbles Community Council regarding the fact that this is the only Art Deco design house in Langland Bay and no reasons have been given for its demolition, the Local Planning Authority acknowledge that the existing dwelling does display an art deco appearance. However the dwelling design is not characteristic of the Langland Bay Conservation Area which is characterized by its landscape setting rather than its architectural qualities. The properties along this stretch also display a sense of individuality in their design and the report maintains that the proposed design would enhance the overall character and appearance of the area.

In conclusion, and having regard to all material considerations including the Human Rights Act, it is considered that demolition of this building would not unduly impact upon the visual amenities of the Langland Bay Conservation Area and as such complies with Policy EV10 of the Swansea UDP.

RECOMMENDATION:

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 The developer shall not commence any works for the demolition of the buildings before a contract for the carrying out of the works for the redevelopment of the site has been signed and planning permission granted for the redevelopment for which the contract provides and a date for the commencement of these works agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure that the character and appearance of the area is not detrimentally affected by the demolition works.

2 The demolition shall be undertaken not later than 5 years from the date of this consent and shall be completed in accordance with the said applications, plans, and conditions. Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 18 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 (as amended) and to ensure the demolition is undertaken within a reasonable period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: (Policy EV10 of the Swansea UDP)

2 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

3 Bats may be present. All British bat species are protected under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and are listed in Schedule 2 of the Conservation (Natural Habitats & c.) Regulations 1994. This legislation implements the EC Habitats & Species Directive in the UK making it an offence to capture, kill or disturb a European Protected Species or to damage or destroy the breeding site or resting place of such an animal. It is also an offence to recklessly / intentionally to disturb such an animal. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 3 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1785

If evidence of bats is encountered during site clearance, work should cease immediately and the advice of the Countryside Council for Wales sought before continuing with any work (01792 634960).

4 Birds may be present in the roof of this building please note it is an offence under the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) to intentionally (intentionally or recklessly for Schedule 1 birds) to: - Kill, injure or take any wild bird - Take, damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird while that nest in use or being built - Take or destroy an egg of any wild bird Care should be taken when working on buildings particularly during the bird nesting season March-August.

PLANS

Bat survey report, drawing number PL01- location plan, PL02- existing site plan, PL03- existing floor plan, PL04- section 1, PL05- existing site section 2, PL06- existing street elevation, PL07- existing site survey received 3rd December 2009

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Llanrhidian Community Hall, Llanrhidian, Swansea, SA3 1EH Proposal: Two storey side extension, addition of pitched roof over existing flat roof, external alterations and provision of 7 space car park Applicant: Llanrhidian Community Hall Trust Ltd

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

This application was DEFERRED FOR A SITE VISIT at the Area 2 Development Control Committee meeting on the 2nd February, 2010, to assess the impact of the development on the amenities of neighbouring residents. My report has been updated to include further letters of correspondence received, and my recommendation remains unchanged.

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV1 New development shall accord with a defined set of criteria of good design. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

Policy EV2 The siting of new development shall give preference to the use of previously developed land and have regard to the physical character and topography of the site and its surroundings. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

Policy EV3 Proposals for new development and alterations to and change of use of existing buildings will be required to meet defined standards of access. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV9 Development within or adjacent to a Conservation Area will only be permitted if it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area or its setting. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy AS6 Provision of car parking in accordance with adopted standards. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289

Policy EC17 Proposals for tourism and recreation developments of an appropriate scale in locations which relate acceptably to the existing pattern of development and/or their surroundings in terms of the nature of the proposal concerned will be permitted provided they comply with a specified list of criteria including standard of design, effect on landscape and nature conservation, effect of visitor pressure on sensitive locations, provide acceptable and safe access, would not cause a loss of best agricultural land. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy HC15 Proposals for new and improved local community and health facilities will be supported subject to compliance with a defined list of criteria including access ability, impact on amenity, effect on natural heritage and historic environment and impact on adjacent road network. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2006/1473 Part two storey part single storey side extension, first floor side extension and side conservatory to southern elevation, first floor balcony and canopy to northern elevation, first floor rear extension with external alterations and provision of new car parking area (7 spaces) with associated landscaping works Decision: Refuse Decision Date: 19/10/2006

2007/2823 Two storey extension, part two storey part single storey side extension and conservatory to southern elevation, first floor side extension, first floor balcony and canopy to northern elevation, first floor rear extension with external alterations and provision of new car parking area (7 spaces) with associated landscaping works Decision: Refuse Decision Date: 12/02/2008

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

ORIGINAL PLANS

The application was advertised on site and in the press as a Development within the Llanrhidian Conservation Area and ten individuals were consulted. TWO LETTERS OF OBJECTION were received which are summarised as follows:

1. The extensions to the hall were previously refused and the current proposal is bigger than before. 2. Previous concerns set out in response to previous schemes reiterated. The need for subtle and discrete development within Llanrhidian Village to ensure that its important rural character is retained. 3. A commercial type development is not needed or required by the community. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289

4. The flat roof of the existing hall ante rooms was given consent by the original owner of neighbouring property, who owned the wall, but there are concerns that there should be no further building on this boundary wall as there is no support for a ridge to be built on this wall. 5. The removal of the road boundary wall is unnecessary to allow access to the site. The site has a right of access to the south of the plot under a Deed of Indenture in the early 1900s which was not disclosed at the time of registration to the Land Registry when the Church registered the freehold title deed of a later date. 6. The Church should register their interest which they should have done from the outset. 7. The wall is an integral part of the site abutting common land and the access point should again be gated. Any recent fencing to the contrary can easily be removed. 8. Any easily accessible fire exit which provides a viewing point of Mount Pleasant should be refused as an infringement of the resident’s privacy. 9. Any residential/over night accommodation at the site should be refused as an overdevelopment/detrimental commercialism. 10. Any change of the main access door should be refused as it would impact on the residential enjoyment of Mount Pleasant especially if moved to the side where the present kitchen is situated. Car traffic and leaving/arriving will severely impact if granted. 11. The overall height of the building should not be increased as it dominates the landscape. 12. A 1950s update is most suitable with Crittal windows etc. and a sunken patio/yard adjoining the proposed renewal of the kitchen area. An outside small venue area linked to the traditional interior of the hall would be most advantageous. A parking area to the south of the site near the present original entrance can only assist and relieve the narrow lane of parked cars.

Highways Observations - This proposal is to improve the existing community hall at Llanrhidian. A new meeting room and toilets are proposed together with bunk room facilities. A car park is proposed that will accommodate 7 vehicles and whilst this is insufficient to accommodate all demand (based on parking guidelines) it is noted that currently no parking facilities are available.

The two bunk rooms are for male and female parties, therefore visitors to this are likely to arrive by mini bus. The remaining car parking spaces can be utilised for operational needs or disabled parking, however this is a matter for the hall management. Access into the parking area is proposed through the low boundary wall and will be single width, however as the road past the access is relatively quiet and likely to carry low speed traffic this is acceptable. The indicated layout does need to be amended in order to provide adequate manoeuvring space for vehicles to enter and leave the parking facilities.

On balance I consider that the proposed alterations are unlikely to attract a significant increase in traffic or parking demand and as some parking is being provided, this is likely to accommodate any additional demand brought about by the improved facilities and that necessary for the bunk room accommodation.

I recommend no highway objection subject to the car park aisle width being increased to 6m. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289

AMENDED AND ADDITIONAL PLANS RECEIVED

The car park layout has been amended to meet the required highway specification regarding 6m car park aisle, and an additional cross section plan has been received showing the relationship of the walk way to the car park to the neighbouring property’s garden land level. Neighbours and previous objectors were reconsulted and TWO LETTERS OF OBJECTION have been received that reiterate previous concerns and raise the following additional issues:-

1. Concerns that more time should be spent on this application as concerns raised in previous letter have not been attended to. 2. In particular concern that the application is largely unchanged from previous and is a backdoor attempt to make an occasional village hall into a full time commercial business. The two storey addition is to house bunk beds and washing/sleeping facilities whereby it becomes commercial accommodation on a 24 hour basis. 3. Remaining concerns that the fire escape will view neighbouring garden and could quite easily become the main entrance for the accommodation. 4. Concern that the community hall has only a short 20 year lease and when it returns to the church could be sold to private hands. This consideration should be taken into account as it may not benefit the community for the forseeable future. 5. The community hall only needs internal alteration. 6. The flat roof over the ante room rests on neighbour’s wall and is not a party wall. The applicants should build within their own land. 7. The report is inaccurate by referring to the boundary wall being tumbledown which is untrue and contrary to the Council’s findings in previous reasons to refuse permission on the effect of the works on the wall and character of the rural lane. Nothing has changed. The wall should be retained as it is and is a sensitive part of the village character and this area is historically significant to Llanrhidian. Existing access points adequately serve the hall and additional ones are not needed. 8. The bunk house accommodation will have 24 hour usage resulting in additional noise and traffic. 9. The shower room will overlook neighbour. 10. The proposal will not enhance tourism. 11. Any extension should be at ground floor level with reduced facilities and the car access at the existing point would reduce traffic hazards to young children. 12. The two storey extension will shade the neighbours garden and will be intrusive because it is on higher land and will dominate the neighbours.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

The application site is situated at Llanrhidian Community Hall, Llanrhidian, which is a small village settlement within the Gower Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

This application seeks full planning permission for the replacement of the existing flat roofed extensions on the southern (side) elevation with a two storey extension, as well as the addition of pitched roof over existing flat roof (rear) extension, external alterations to the community hall, and the associated provision of a 7 space car park and new access arrangements. The proposed refurbishments and extensions are intended to upgrade the facilities within this community hall which is considered no longer fit for purpose. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289

The community hall is located within the Llanrhidian Conservation Area and dates from the 19th century when it was erected as a school on steeply rising ground to the south of the Church. The building was opened as a Church Hall in 1934 when alterations were carried out, and has in recent years been used as a community hall. The surrounding area is characterised by the sporadic residential development along the lanes and spaces that surround the village core centred around the church which dates from the 12th/13th century. The application site is bounded by a lane to the north and west and by private gardens of neighbouring residential properties to the south and east, and faces common land on the opposite side of the adjacent lane to the west. The site is currently only accessed by a pedestrian gate off this lane.

The Design and Access Statement submitted with this application explains that in recent years the hall has been little used, but the recent demand for improved facilities for new clubs, societies and other local interest groups has resulted in the need for the proposed improvements and extensions to the building and grounds. In particular, the current proposal has been designed to facilitate the additional rooms and storage facilities needed to improve the viability of the building. The proposal aims to increase the accessibility of the building for all users, to improve the toilet, kitchen and storage facilities and provide an additional meeting room. The proposal also includes a small bunkhouse facility to be provided in the roof space of the side extension. The DAS also explains that the boundary walls are in reasonable state except for the stone wall alongside the lane which needs to be repaired.

Background planning history

Members should be aware that applications for the extension of the Community Hall and increase in size of the associated car park have been previously submitted and refused by this Authority in October 2006 (Ref: 2006/1473) and in February 2008 (Ref. 2007/2823). This latter application was refused for the following reasons:-

1. The excessive and unsympathetic siting, scale and design of the proposal would result in the introduction of incongruous and discordant features at this sensitive location which would have a detrimental visual impact upon the building to which they relate, the Llanrhidian Conservation Area and the Gower AONB, contrary to the requirements of Policies BE17 and BE2 of the Swansea Local Plan Review No.1

2. The proposed car parking area and new access which would result in the removal of part of an attractive stone wall would have an unacceptable urbanising effect and would be detrimental to the character and appearance of this rural lane, the Llanrhidian Conservation Area and Gower AONB contrary to the requirements of Policies BE17, BE2 and CL9 of the Swansea Local Plan Review No.1.

3. The increase in noise and activity that would result from the proposed car parking area would unacceptably impact upon the residential amenities that the occupiers of the adjoining property could reasonably expect to enjoy and as such is contrary to the requirements of Policy BE2 of the Swansea Local Plan Review No. 1.

Officers have subsequently provided advice to the applicant regarding appropriate amendments to the scheme, and the current scheme has been submitted seeking to address the previous reasons for refusal. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289

Main Issues

The principle of the church hall being used for community use is well established, and the main issues to be considered are therefore the visual impact of the proposed extension on the character and appearance of the original hall building and the impact of the proposed extension and new access and car parking arrangements on the character and appearance of the surrounding conservation area, the visual and residential amenities of neighbouring residential properties, and highway safety at this location having regard to prevailing Unitary Development Plan policies. There are in this instance no additional overriding considerations arising from the provisions of the Human Rights Act.

The most important material planning considerations when considering the proposed new development at this conservation area location are how it assimilates into the surrounding village character and landscape and how it sustains the special character of this area in line with the criteria of the prevailing UDP Policies EV1, EV2, EV9, EV26.

In addition to the primary objective to preserve and enhance the natural beauty of the Gower AONB, any new development at this location is required to respect the character and appearance of the conservation area and surrounding street scene and visual and residential amenity of neighbouring properties. To this end a high quality of design and materials is required for the proposed hall extension in relation to siting, scale, proportion, texture and colour, and similarly the new access and car park arrangements will have to incorporate a good standard of landscape design and be carefully finished in materials that are appropriate to this sensitive conservation area and AONB location.

In addition, to complement the above policy requirements, Policy AS6 requires appropriate access facilities and/or infrastructure for development proposals.

As the proposal includes bunk house accommodation, Policy EC17 is applicable and supports in principle proposals for tourism and recreation developments of an appropriate scale in suitable locations, subject to certain criteria. Similarly Policy HC15 supports new and improved local community facilities subject to certain criteria.

Visual Impact

The community hall is located within the conservation area on steeply rising ground to the south of the church and has an extensive area of land laid out to grass to the south. The Design and Access Statement explains that although the site is steep, excavations have proved that it will be able to extend into the slope without difficulty and the visual impact of the proposed extension will be reduced by the rising ground.

Proposed Extension to the Community Hall

The current proposals to refurbish and extend the community hall have been designed so that the extended building appears as an integrated whole, rather than a number of add on extensions. As such, it is considered that the two storey side extension has been sensitively designed with a homogenous design where the new roof maintains a uniform ridge line and the eaves height that respects the existing building. Moreover, it is considered that the siting of the extension on the southern side of the building will result in it being significantly screened by the existing building and the lay of the land, so that there is no adverse visual impact on the historic centre of the village to the north and in addition there will be no adverse impact on long distance views from the marsh beyond. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289

The northern elevation facing the church and central core of the village conservation area will remain unchanged.

In addition, the new front entrance will be enhanced by a strong entrance feature that relates well to the overall design of the building, and provides an improved link via a new path and front gateway to the neighbouring lane and immediate public realm. Whilst there is a raised pathway link from the first floor accommodation to the car park, based on the additional information received and careful consideration of the site and surrounds, it is not considered that this will result in any unacceptable visual harm to the site or surrounds. The replacement of the flat roof to the single storey rear extension with a pitched roof will further complement the resultant hall design. Finally it is considered that the new windows and doors to the extension have been designed to respect the character of the existing fenestration on the original hall building.

The existing hall is covered by a poor render and asbestos roof tiles, and it is considered that the external appearance of the overall building can be enhanced by the proposed repair of the existing render and replacement of roof tiles to match the new extension. However, as the building is located within the Llanrhidian Conservation Area and the Gower AONB, it is considered necessary to ensure that the materials used are of the highest quality to preserve and enhance the character of this area. Therefore, notwithstanding the materials indicated on the plans, it is considered necessary to condition the external materials so that samples are agreed with the Local Planning Authority. Similarly to ensure that the rainwater goods, eaves, windows and solar panels are of the highest quality and complement the existing building, further details of these features will be required by condition.

Proposed new access and car parking arrangements

As previously considered under the previous applications, the new access points to the hall and car park would involve the removal of two small sections of the existing stone wall which border the adjacent lane, (albeit one section would replace the existing entrance which would be blocked up). The Design and Access statement maintains, however, that the boundary walls along the lane are tumbledown and will become dangerous in the long term. The pedestrian gateway will be re-sited approximately 1.5m to the south of the existing gateway and provide improved pedestrian access for all users to the new main entrance to the hall, in line with current access requirements. The new vehicular access will be provided approximately 14.5m to the south of the existing building, and 4.5m from the gable end of the new extension. This access will involve the removal of approximately 6m of existing wall to provide the necessary splay, which narrows to 3.2m where it is set back 2.3m from the front lane. This entrance will be physically defined by new walls that curve into the new car park entrance. In addition the car park works will include a 1.2m high retaining wall on the southern boundary of the car parking bays, and steps to the new courtyard in front of the new hall access door. In addition, it is noted that as there is no current off street car parking facility for the hall, the car park proposal will help to reduce pressure for car parking on surrounding roads in the conservation area and on neighbouring protected common land.

Whilst it is acknowledged that one of the previous reasons for refusal related to the visual impact of the car parking area, this was based on the perceived cumulative effect of the hard surfacing works together with the associated engineering works and retaining structures that were previously considered to have an urbanising effect upon the character and appearance of the surrounding conservation area. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289

The current proposal has been supported by additional information, including the DAS and cross sectional details that demonstrate that apart from the new vehicular entrance, the proposed car parking works will be significantly screened by the existing hall building from views to the north. In addition, it is considered that subject to sensitive rebuilding of the boundary wall at the site of the new access arrangements, there will be limited visual impact on the immediate street scene. Moreover, it is considered that the proposed new boundary wall along the southern boundary will help screen the car park, and this could be further enhanced by suitable boundary hedging or shrubs.

However, given this sensitive conservation area location, it is considered necessary to ensure satisfactory materials are used for the car park surface, boundary and retaining walls, front apron to the access, to ensure a high standard of finish complementary to this conservation area location. In particular, it is considered that grasscrete or similar would be a more acceptable finish than the proposed stone dust over hardcore for the car park. Material samples will also be required for the boundary and retaining walls. These details and any supplementary planting considered necessary and reasonable, can be controlled by condition. On balance, therefore, it is considered that subject to sensitive use of appropriate materials and supplementary landscaping, this relatively modest car parking scheme is visually acceptable at this location.

Residential Amenity

Turning to residential amenity issues, it is not considered that the proposed extension would result in any unacceptable overbearing physical impact or direct overlooking of neighbouring properties, due to the orientation of the building in relation to surrounding properties. Similarly it is not considered that there will be any unacceptable physical or visual overbearance of neighbouring properties.

However, in response to concerns raised by the neighbouring owners of Mount Pleasant Farm, additional cross sectional plans of the proposed walkway, from the proposed fire exit from the first floor accommodation to the car park, have been submitted, which help clarify the extent of possible overlooking from this walkway. It is considered that these plans show that the neighbouring garden land at Mount Pleasant Farm lies at a lower level to the east, and on the basis of the information submitted it is considered that this part of the neighbouring garden will be substantially screened by the wall and drop in levels. In addition, the nearest gable elevation of the house is sited over 23m from the walkway and will be partly screened by the intervening barn. As such it is not considered that there will be any harm to the amenities currently enjoyed by the occupiers of this property through overlooking or loss of privacy.

Similarly, due to its position and height in the roof plane, it is not considered that there will be any unacceptable overlooking from the proposed velux window in the east facing slope of the side extension. In addition, it is not considered that the change to the main access door will have any adverse impact on the neighbouring property as it faces the front western access lane and not the property of Mount Pleasant Farm. Having regard to the concern raised reading loss of view, this is not a material planning consideration.

Whilst it was considered in previous applications that the proposed car parking area would have a detrimental impact in terms of noise and increased activity, upon the residential amenities of the occupiers of the nearest residential property to the south at Ashtree Cottage, these occupiers have not raised any objections. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289

In mitigation, however, it is considered that the proposed car park can only accommodate seven vehicles at any time which is relatively modest, given the probability that some private houses in this countryside locality probably have a larger than average number of private and working vehicles. Moreover, it is considered that the parking bays will be sited over 10m from the nearest gable elevation of the above neighbouring house, and it should be noted that apart from one small first floor window, this house presents a dead frontage to the application site. In addition to the new stone wall indicated on the revised plans, the car park proposal will also be separated by the intervening access lane from Ashtree Cottage. On this basis, it is not considered that there are sufficient grounds to refuse the proposed development in terms of traffic noise and disturbance to the neighbouring residents.

With regard to the proposed enhancement of the hall with extra facilities including the bunk rooms, it is not considered that the relatively modest nature and use of the proposal will result in any increased detriment to the amenities of the nearest residents of the surrounding area. Late representation from a neighbour raise concerns that the proposal will make an occasional village hall into a full time commercial business. As referred to above, the DAS explains that the need for the improved facilities are for community use (Class D1), including improved access, kitchen, hall and toilet facilities. The provision of two small bunk rooms and associated toilet/shower rooms in the attic of the new extension are intended to provide further revenue for the upkeep of the hall. The floorspace for the proposed bunk rooms and associated shower rooms will only account for only 11% of the overall floorspace of the proposed future facilities, and as such are considered ancillary to the main community hall use.

In conclusion, it is considered that the primary use as a community hall at this location is well established, and is sited in a sustainable location close to the village centre of Llanrhidian and its local church, village pub and restaurant. Moreover, it is considered that the proposal will enhance rather than detract from the residential and visual amenities of the surrounding area, and will meet community and sustainable transport objectives to provide locally based facilities close to residential communities.

Highways Issues

The Head of Transportation and Engineering has considered the proposed access and car parking layout and made the following comments. A car park is proposed that will accommodate 7 vehicles and whilst this is insufficient to accommodate all demand (based on parking guidelines) it is noted that currently no parking facilities are available.

The two bunk rooms are for male and female parties, therefore visitors to this are likely to arrive by mini bus. The remaining car parking spaces can be utilised for operational needs or disabled parking, however this is a matter for the hall management. Access into the parking area is proposed through the low boundary wall and will be single width, however as the road past the access is relatively quiet and likely to carry low speed traffic this is acceptable. The indicated layout does need to be amended in order to provide adequate manoeuvring space for vehicles to enter and leave the parking facilities.

On balance it is considered that the proposed alterations are unlikely to attract a significant increase in traffic or parking demand, and as some parking is being provided on site, this is likely to accommodate any additional demand brought about by the improved facilities and that needed for the bunk room accommodation. There is no highway objection subject to the car park aisle width being increased to 6m width. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289

In response to this highway requirement, amended plans have been submitted which will bring the car parking bays move approximately 1.5m nearer the southern boundary. This is not considered to have any significant increased adverse impact on the amenities of the occupiers of the neighbouring residential properties.

Other Material Considerations

The issues raised in the letters of objection received include concerns relating to the design, scale, height, and siting of the proposed extension and fire escape, and the impact of these proposals on the amenities of neighbouring properties and the rural character of Llanrhidian village, which have been addressed above in the main body of the report. In particular, it is considered that the overall design and layout of the proposed development, including the siting and design of the windows, has been designed to ensure there is no loss of residential amenity, including no loss of privacy through overlooking.

Similarly, the concerns raised regarding the car park and works to the wall are considered in detail above in the main body of the report. In particular, it should be noted that the above appraisal refers to the findings of the Design and Access Statement which states that the boundary walls are tumbledown condition. Based on the information submitted, it is considered that the current scheme has been sensitively designed to retain and repair the majority of wall and only remove small sections where necessary. However, the details of the materials used for the treatment of the wall and surfacing of the car park are crucial to ensure a high quality finish that visually enhances the conservation area. Also it should be noted that the landowner could remove the small sections of wall indicated without planning permission. There is case law that conservation area consent is only required if more than half the wall were removed.

The application proposals are not considered to impact on the historic lane access or common land or heritage conservation of this area of the village, or interfere with any current or future common land access by commoners. The proposed off street car parking will reduce pressure for parking not only on surrounding village roads but also may reduce current parking on the nearest common land on the opposite side of the lane. Note the objector’s reference to proposals to fence the common are separate matters not part of this application and would require Welsh Assembly approval, as well as planning permission. The nearest registered common land is located on the opposite side of the adjacent lane and does not abut the northern or western curtilage boundary walls of the application site.

As considered above in the main body of the report, it is considered that the bunk house accommodation has been proposed for the purposes of sustaining the community hall refurbishment and future viable use. The hall committee has discussed the scheme with the community at pre application stage. The residential accommodation provided by the bunk rooms is considered an ancillary use to the main hall use and will be managed by the hall committee. There is no evidence supporting the objector’s assertion that the new management committee for the hall is seeking to commercialise the site. On this basis, and the limited floorspace involved, it is considerd that the bunk room use will be ancillary to the main Class D1 use as a community hall. The proposal has been kept to a modest amount to ensure that there is limited residential impact on surrounding neighbours, and on this basis it is not considered that there will be any adverse impact on the character of the site. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289

The agent has served notice on the Diocese of Swansea and Brecon as owners of the site but no representation has been received from the church. Any access arrangements that require the permission of the church are private legal matters to be considered separately from the planning application. Similarly, notice has been served on the owners of the neighbouring property at Mount Pleasant Farm as the existing rear extension rests on the boundary wall owned by this property. Therefore, notwithstanding any planning approval granted for the pitched roof to this extension, separate consent would be required by the owners of Mount Pleasant Farm and this would be a private legal matter between the respective parties. Land ownership is a civil matter and the issue of the lease is not considered a material planning consideration.

Conclusions

In conclusion, and having regard to all material considerations including the Human Rights Act, it is considered that the revised scheme for the proposed community hall extension and new car parking and access arrangements has been sensitively designed to protect the residential and visual amenities of the area, and subject to conditions, will satisfactorily relate to the design of the existing hall building and will preserve and enhance the character and appearance of this part of the Llanrhidian Conservation Area and Gower Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty in line with the essential criteria of UDP Policies EV1, EV2 EV3, EV9, EV26, AS6. Moreover the proposal will provide improved community facilities and help sustain the hall through modest recreation/tourism revenue in line with the criteria of Policies HC15 and EC17 respectively. Approval is therefore recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 The development shall be commenced not later than the expiration of 5 years from the date of this planning permission and shall be completed in accordance with the said application plans and conditions prior to any part thereof being brought into beneficial use, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1990 and to ensure that the development is completed in accordance with the plans approved by the City and County of Swansea, and so avoid any detriment to amenity or public safety by works remaining uncompleted.

2 Notwithstanding the plans submitted, before the beneficial use of the new car park commences, the sections of wall to be rebuilt on the western highway boundary and southern access lane boundary, and the proposed retaining walls to the car park, as well as a gate to the car park, shall be completed in accordance with details to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The agreed works shall be maintained and retained as approved unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity and highway safety.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289

3 Notwithstanding the plans submitted, prior to the commencement of any development works to the car park and associated access, the surfaces shall be constructed with a grass reinforcing system in accordance with details to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority, and all works shall be completed and maintained in accordance with the approved details unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity.

4 Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, prior to the commencement of the proposed extension, the following materials samples will be erected on site and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority: - A sample panel of at least 1 metre square of render. - A sample tile. - A sample of external joinery including samples of window frames, door frames, doors, eaves, fascias and soffits.

All approved sample panels erected on site shall be retained on site until the completion of the works and all works shall be completed in accordance with the approved details unless agreed otherwise in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity.

5 Notwithstanding the details shown on any approved plan, a scheme for the storage of refuse within the curtilage of the site shall be implemented in accordance with details to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority prior to the beneficial occupation of the building. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity.

6 Notwithstanding the plans submitted, no development shall take place without the prior written approval of the Local Planning Authority of a scheme for the landscaping of the site. The landscaping scheme shall be carried out within 12 months from the completion of the development. Any trees or shrubs planted in accordance with this condition which are removed, die, become seriously diseased within two years of planting shall be replaced by trees or shrubs of similar size and species to those originally required to be planted. Reason: To ensure that the site is satisfactorily landscaped having regard to its location and the nature of the proposed development, and to accord with Section 197 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.

7 Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority, prior to the commencement of the external landscape works, a sample panel of all paving materials to the courtyard and a sample of the steps to the car park shall be erected on site and all materials approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. All approved sample panels shall be retained on site until the completion of the works . All works shall be completed in accordance with the approved details, and maintained and retained as such unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 4 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1289

8 Notwithstanding the plans submitted, details of the proposed solar panels at a scale of 1:10 (unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority) , shall be submitted and agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity.

9 Notwithstanding the plans submitted, details of any external lighting associated with the development of the community hall extension, new access and car parking shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Any proposed lighting scheme shall be implemented in accordance with agreed details and shall be retained and maintained as such unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity.

INFORMATIVES 1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: Policies EV1, EV2, EV3, EV9, EV26, AS6, EC17, and HC15.

2 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

3 Bats may be present. All British bat species are protected under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and are listed in Schedule 2 of the Conservation (Natural Habitats & c.) Regulations 1994. This legislation implements the EC Habitats & Species Directive in the UK making it an offence to capture, kill or disturb a European Protected Species or to damage or destroy the breeding site or resting place of such an animal. It is also an offence to recklessly / intentionally to disturb such an animal. If evidence of bats is encountered during site clearance, work should cease immediately and the advice of the Countryside Council for Wales sought before continuing with any work (01792 634960).

4 Birds may be present in the roof of this building please note it is an offence under the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) to intentionally (intentionally or recklessly for Schedule 1 birds) to: - Kill, injure or take any wild bird - Take, damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird while that nest in use or being built - Take or destroy an egg of any wild bird Care should be taken when working on buildings particularly during the bird nesting season March-August.

PLANS Design and Access Statement, 2808-1site plan, existing floor plan, existing elevations and proposed north elevation, 2808-02A block plan, proposed ground floor, 2808-3 proposed first floor, proposed elevations and sections received 25th August 2009. Additional cross section plan received 1st December 2009. Amended plan 2808-4/A layout plan received 15th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 5 APPLICATION NO. 2009/1271 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Compass Coffee Shop, Reynoldston, Swansea, SA3 1AN Proposal: Change of use from coffee shop (Class A3) and first floor holiday flat (Class C3) to one detached dwelling (Class C3), front canopy, porch and two new accesses Applicant: Mr R Holloway

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

This application was DEFERRED FOR A SITE VISIT at the Area 2 Development Control Committee 2nd February 2010 to assess the impact of the development given that it is a brownfield site. My recommendation of refusal remains unchanged.

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV1 New development shall accord with a defined set of criteria of good design. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC12 The conversion of existing buildings in the countryside to new uses that contribute to the local economy and the extensions of such buildings will be permitted subject to a defined set of criteria including the building's structural integrity, its ability to be converted without prejudicing the character of the building or its locality, the building's compatibility with its surroundings, issues of access and highway safety, and the building's past uses etc. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 5 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1271

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2005/1926 Retention of change of use from repair workshop to tea room (Class A3) with holiday flat (Class C3) at first floor and associated external alterations, new access, 12 no. space car park and formation of outside seating area (amendment to planning application 2002/1580 granted on 17th January 2003) Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 24/04/2006

2002/1580 Change of use of repair workshop to a tea room (Class A3) with holiday flat (Class C3) at first floor and associated external alterations Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 17/01/2003

2006/1745 Demolition of existing dwelling and construction of detached dwelling house Decision: Refuse Decision Date: 20/02/2007

2007/1604 Demolition of existing dwelling and construction of detached dwelling house Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 16/10/2007

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site and in the press as a Departure from the Local Plan. No response.

The Gower Society – Objects:

1. It is only a short time since this coffee shop was developed from a former auto-repair garage. 2. We are advised that considerable grants were obtained for this development on the grounds that it would assist the tourist industry. 3. A previous application for a holiday flat above the shop was also granted. 4. An application for demolishing the bungalow at the rear of the property was eventually given after many changes to the original design. 5. The shop could be a viable business if operated efficiently; the area needs this sort of tourist facility. 6. If this proposal should be allowed, then the ugly fence should be replaced with a hedge as originally present.

Highways Observations - I have no objection to this proposal in principle, however the alteration of the existing access needs to be amended to maximise on the available visibility and therefore should remain as currently. The new access to serve the converted coffee shop is satisfactorily located away from the bend. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 5 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1271

I recommend no highway objection subject to the submission of amended details indicating the retention of the current access in its current position

APPLICANT’S SUPPORTING STATEMENT is summarised as follows:

The property was developed from a failed business and at the time the advice we received was that we could only convert the building into another business.

We felt we had no choice other than put another business in its place and we were informed that if it was to fall down, we would not be able to replace this with any structure. We thought long and hard about it and decided that a coffee shop and holiday let may work. The project cost us a substantial amount of money and we felt that we were forced to turn the building into another business or lose the right to redevelop altogether. The original garage was devaluing our home because of the state of disrepair and it was hazardous. A similar building in Gower was recently allowed to become a dwelling without going through the process of trying a business there first.

The coffee shop and flat has not been successful financially and although we obtained a 4 star rating from the Welsh Tourist Board, we are still unable to secure bookings for it. It still requires one of us to work full time just to pay the bills. We have put both properties for sale and have vigorously tries to sell them together and separately but have received no offers. Our instructions to the Estate Agent were to market the property together and separately and we were prepared to accept offers on the coffee shop as a separate entity but received no offers in relation to the coffee shop.

To date we have received no offers and cannot go on working 7 days a week to try and make it work. We have no option than to try and change this property to a dwelling to try and sell it to stay in our home.

The holiday let market is saturated on Gower and people who have bought houses from out of the area let their houses unofficially. Since we opened a fish shop, 4 coffee shops and a restaurant with rooms doubling as a coffee shop plus numerous holiday lets have all been granted planning permission. Meanwhile affordable community housing is declining and being replaced by second homes and expensive detached dwellings that only a few can afford.

The position of the coffee shop is on a main road and has no public footpaths or public transport servicing the business. It is not at a destination area such as one of the beaches so the only way to attract customer is by car and car parking is limited. Also planning has restricted the use of the shop to not be used as a hot food takeaway.

We would like to be given the chance to stay in our home and at the same time create a new family home perhaps for a family in the community who otherwise would not be able to afford to live in Gower.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 5 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1271

Full planning permission is sought for a change of use of the Compass Coffee Shop with the holiday flat above in Reynoldston to a detached dwelling house with external alterations and the provision of two new vehicular accesses. The alterations include a new front porch and front canopy with the creation of a residential curtilage for the new dwelling in part of the existing car parking area, enclosed by a 1.2m high stone wall and the creation of a new access to provide a driveway to the existing dwelling to the rear, “Sunnybank”.

The main issues to be considered are the principle of a dwelling house at this location and the resultant effect upon the character and appearance of the area, having specific regard to Swansea Unitary Development Policies EV1, EV22, EV26, EV21 and EC12 and the planning history of the site.

Policy EV1 specifies that developments should comply with the criteria of good design. Policies EV22 and EV26 of the Swansea UDP seek to protect the environment and natural beauty of the countryside for its own sake. Within the Gower AONB the protection of natural beauty will be the primary objective. Policy EC12 refers to the conversion of existing buildings in the open countryside.

The application site was given planning permission to be partially rebuilt and converted to a holiday let and coffee shop from a car repair garage in 2003 (2002/1580 refers). A subsequent amended application was approved in 2006 (2005/1926 refers), which included the formation of a 12 space car park and the provision of an outside seating area. In both applications, the scheme was considered acceptable as it would contribute to the local economy and would have a positive impact upon the visual amenities of the area by removing an unsightly repair garage. There is no information on either file that shows that the applicants wanted to apply for anything else and were prevented from doing so. However, the Policies in place at that time were in favour of the re-use of the existing building to uses that supported the local economy and holiday accommodation.

In their supporting statement, the applicants state that they have run the business for the last few years and have tried to make it a success and that the conversion is their only option for them to try and stay in their home. Policy EC12 of the Unitary Development Plan which refers to the reuse of existing buildings in the open countryside states that residential use of non- residential buildings in the open countryside will not be supported unless evidence is provided that the premises has been actively marketed without success for appropriate business use or that the residential use is ancillary to a business reuse of the premises or that the resultant residential use will contribute to an identified local need for housing or for affordable housing in the location concerned.

The applicants have supplied some evidence that the premises has been marketed for sale but in the details submitted both the Coffee shop and dwelling have been marketed as one combined unit. It is considered that by not marketing the Coffee shop separately at a more affordable price, many prospective purchasers would have been put off from even enquiring about the business. The applicant has been advised to market the Coffee Shop separately but to date has failed to do so. The applicant has also been advised that if the premises were converted to one single holiday unit, then this would be supported by Policy. However, the applicant does not feel, for the reasons put forward in his supporting statement, that this would be a viable business option. It is also unclear from the evidence submitted what length of time the premises has been marketed for. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 5 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1271

In terms of visual amenity, the conversion of the building would not make a visual difference to the area over and above what is on site at present apart from the addition of a front porch and canopy. However, the change to the means of enclosure would be an improvement on the current situation on site as it would be more sympathetic to the area. Bearing this in mind, it is considered that if the premises were converted to a holiday let, a change to the means of enclosure would also be an improvement. The applicant mentions several times in his statement that the conversion would provide an affordable dwelling for local residents, however, no evidence has been provided to demonstrate how this would be achieved.

Turning to highway safety issues, the Head of Transportation and Engineering raises no highway objection subject to an amendment to the current access proposals which could be dealt with by condition. However, as the application is being recommended for refusal, it is considered unreasonable to request the applicant to go to the expense of submitting amended plans at this stage.

In conclusion therefore and having regard to all material considerations, including the Human Rights Act, the proposal is not considered an acceptable form of development at this location as it fails to comply with the provisions of Policies EV1, EV22, EV26, and EC12 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 and refusal is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

REFUSE, for the following reasons:

1 The change of use of the building to a detached dwelling constitutes an unjustified and inappropriate form of development within the open countryside and Gower AONB, contrary to Countryside Protection Policies EV1, EC12, EV22 and EV26 of the City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008.

2 Approval of this application would lead to the setting of an undesirable precedent the cumulative effect of which would lead to an unacceptable impact upon the character and appearance of the Gower AONB, contrary to the requirements of Policies EV1, EC12, EV22 and EV26 of the City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: Policies EV1, EV22, EV26 and EC12.

PLANS

Proposed floor plans, existing elevations, proposed elevations received 16th October 2009. Amended plans site location plan and existing block plan, proposed block plan and additional supporting statement received 1st December 2009

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 6 APPLICATION NO. 2009/1666 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: The Dingle Horton Swansea SA3 1LB Proposal: Side conservatory Applicant: Mrs Catherine Dorran

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

This application was DEFERRED FOR A SITE VISIT at the Area 2 Development Control Committee on 2nd February 2010 to assess the impact of the development on the surrounding area. My recommendation of refusal remains unchanged.

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy HC7 Proposals for extensions and alterations to existing residential dwellings will be assess in terms of; relationship to the existing dwelling, impact on the character and appearance of the streetscene, effect on neighbouring properties, and impact on car parking. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV9 Development within or adjacent to a Conservation Area will only be permitted if it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area or its setting. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV1 New development shall accord with a defined set of criteria of good design. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 6 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1666

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 91/1308 CONSERVATION AREA CONSENT TO DEMOLISH SHEET METAL/TIMBER GARAGES Decision: *HGCC - GRANT CONSENT WITH CONDITIONS Decision Date: 03/12/1991

2008/0337 One detached dwelling (outline) Decision: Refuse Decision Date: 28/04/2008

94/0920 ADDITION OF PITCHED ROOF TO TWO STOREY REAR EXTENSION AND SINGLE STOREY FLAT ROOF REAR EXTENSION Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 21/09/1994

91/1237 ERECTION OF GARAGE TO REPLACE EXISTING Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/11/1991

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site and in the press as a Development within the Horton Conservation area and two individual properties were consulted. No response.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Full planning permission is sought for a side conservatory at The Dingle, Horton. The proposed conservatory would measure 3m in depth by 5m in width with an overall lean-to height of 3m. The conservatory would be constructed out of white Upvc and will be sited flush with the main front wall of the dwelling.

The main issue to be considered in this instance is the visual impact of the proposed conservatory on the host dwelling together with the surrounding Conservation Area and AONB, having regard to the Policies HC7, EV9, EV22 and EV26 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008. Policy HC7 relates to criteria against which householder extension must be assessed and Policy EV9 states that all developments within a Conservation area will only be permitted if it will preserve or enhance its character. Policies EV22 and EV26 seek to protect the landscape of the Gower AONB for its own sake and to preserve it for future generations.

With regards to residential amenity, it is considered that detached nature of the dwelling would dictate that here would be no loss of residential amenity for occupiers of neighbouring properties through loss of light, privacy or overbearing physical impact. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 6 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1666

Whilst it is acknowledged that The Dingle has white Upvc windows and as such the use of white UPVC for the conservatory would be consistent with this, it is however considered that the siting and unsympathetic design of the conservatory on this attractive property in a highly visible area within the Horton Conservation Area would neither relate well to the overall appearance of the host dwelling nor preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. In addition, the prominence of the property from public vantage points also dictates that the conservatory would unacceptably detract from the visual amenities of the Gower AONB, thus conflicting with Policies EV1, HC7, EV9, EV22 and EV26 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008.

Whilst there is a hedge at the site frontage this is not considered sufficient to mitigate the harm identified above.

In conclusion therefore and having regard to all material considerations including the Human Rights Act, the proposed conservatory is not considered an acceptable form of development at this location, conflicting with the requirements of the prevailing Development Plan and refusal is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

REFUSE, for the following reason:

1 The proposed conservatory by virtue of its design and siting in such a visually prominent position would fail to preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Horton Conservation Area and Gower AONB contrary to Policies EV1, EV9, EV26 and HC7 of the City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan (2008) and the Council's Design Guide for Householder Development.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application:HC7, EV9, EV22, EV26, EV1.

PLANS

Site location plan, existing block plan, proposed block plan, existing ground floor plan, existing south and east elevation, proposed floor plan and south and east elevation, proposed north elevation received 4th December 2009

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 7 APPLICATION NO. 2008/0447 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Land adjacent to Underhill Cottage, Horton, Swansea, SA3 1LQ Proposal: Detached dwelling Applicant: Mr P Hughes

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

This application has been DEFERRED 4 times. It was DEFERRED FOR A SITE VISIT at the Area 2 Development Control Committee on 14th October 2008 to assess whether the site is appropriate infill. It was then DEFERRED at the Area 2 Development Control Committee on 4th November 2008 to allow for the submission of full details. It was then DEFERRED at the Area 2 Development Control Committee on 4th August 2009 to allow further consideration following the submission of full details. The application has since been amended further following a further DEFERRAL on 15th September 2009, and my recommendation is now for Approval.

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV1 New development shall accord with a defined set of criteria of good design. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

Policy EV2 The siting of new development shall give preference to the use of previously developed land and have regard to the physical character and topography of the site and its surroundings. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

Policy EV9 Development within or adjacent to a Conservation Area will only be permitted if it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area or its setting. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV16 Within the small villages identified on the Proposals Map, small-scale development will be approved only where it is appropriate to the location in terms of the defined criteria. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV3 Proposals for new development and alterations to and change of use of existing buildings will be required to meet defined standards of access. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 7 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2008/0447

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 92/0211 Erection of a dwelling (Outline)

Decision: Appeal Dismissed Decision Date: 12/11/1992

99/0637 Erection of a detached single storey double garage Decision: Appeal Dismissed Decision Date: 13/04/2000

2004/1197 Construction of one detached dwelling Decision: Refuse Decision Date: 05/10/2004

2007/1989 Construction of one detached dwelling Decision: Refuse Decision Date: 06/08/2008

2009/1081 Detached dwelling house Decision: Withdrawn Decision Date: 31/07/2009

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

Neighbours: The application was advertised on site in the form of a site notice and in the press as development within a Conservation Area. One letter of comment was received:

1. We would prefer a low rise property which would fit into the natural surroundings. 2. We do not object but would have you take this on board as it may help us with our future developments. 3. We would prefer it be on a lower level, the same as the existing house. 4. Concern over why we weren’t consulted.

Gower Society: Following comments:

1. The proposed outline plans do not show the impact that this could have on the Conservation Area and the AONB. 2. We are slightly concerned about over-development, any full permission must have regard to other property, the landscape and impact when seen from the road and further away on the beach etc.

Highways: This proposal is for a new dwelling on land adjacent to Underhill Cottage. Access will be directly from the main road through Horton near to the lane access serving Underhill Cottage. I am satisfied that a safe access and be provided together with suitable parking and turning facilities within the site. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 7 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2008/0447

I recommend no highway objection on condition that the developer;

1. Sets back the entrance gateway 5 metres from the edge of the existing carriageway and realigns the property boundaries to form 45 degree vision splays. 2. Ensures that the recessed area is not obstructed by any chain or other barrier and is kept open at all times. 3. Surfaces the recessed area to Highway Authority Satisfaction. 4. Ensures that the entrance gateway is no more than 150mm above or below the level of the near side carriageway. 5. Ensures that the drive gradient is no steeper than 1 in 6. 6. Provides a satisfactory turning space within the curtilage of the site. 7. Ensures that no surface water from within the site flows onto the highway.

Amended plans were received in order to try and address concerns raised by the Local Planning Authority.

Neighbours: ONE neighbouring dwelling was individually consulted and the application was advertised on site and in the press as development within a Conservation Area. No letters of response were received.

Gower Society: Following comment:

 This proposed building is sited in the Horton Conservation Area; therefore its design and impact on the landscape and surrounding area must be of paramount importance.  We note the new position of the proposed dwelling lower on the plot – this should create a lessened impact.  This is still a large property on this sloping site; we note that an attempt has been made to build it slightly into the slope.  We also note the improved fenestration impact.

Highways: The amended plans indicate in more detail the site layout and confirm that the existing access which is being utilised is already set back from the edge of the highway. New accesses are required to be set back by 5m and this access is set back less than that, however it is already in existence and has adequate visibility and I consider it unnecessary to require its alteration. No highway objections are raised.

APPRAISAL:

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis

Members will recall that this application has been deferred at this Committee on four separate occasions to allow for a site visit and then again following negotiations with the Local Planning Authority to allow for the submission of a scheme to overcome officer concerns.

This application seeks full planning permission for the erection of a detached dwelling on land which forms part of the residential curtilage of the property known as ‘Underhill Cottage’, Horton. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 7 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2008/0447

The application site is situated within the garden of an existing dwelling, which is located within the village of Horton. The dwelling has been re-designed in order to incorporate a more traditional design and a revised siting at a lower level. As such the proposed site comprises an infill plot between Underhill cottage and the road. The pattern of development in this rural village is characteristic of many small villages on Gower with a mix of dwellings spread out on a range of plot sizes, forming ribbons of development along the tight and narrow network of lanes.

The main issues for consideration with regard to this application relate to the suitability of the proposed dwelling on this infill plot at this location within the Horton Conservation Area and Gower AONB having regard to Policies EV1, EV2, EV9, EV16 and EV26 of the Swansea Unitary Development Plan. There are in this case considered to be no additional overriding issues for consideration having regard to the provisions of the Human Rights Act.

Horton is characterised by a mixture of housing types and with this in mind it is considered that for a dwelling to integrate seamlessly into the street-scene, issues such as scale, design, materials and external appearance are important material planning considerations.

Given the variation in house design exhibited at this location, there is no objection in principle to a sensitive design response which would accord with Policies EV1, EV2, EV16, EV9 and EV26 of the Swansea UDP, the aims of which are to protect and enhance the Conservation Area and wider Gower AONB, respect the character and appearance of the street scene and the amenity of neighbouring properties and ensure appropriate small- scale development within small villages on Gower. However the design of any new dwelling in this location has to strike a balance between a design that exhibits a strong composition and high quality materials with a need to ensure that the scale and massing of the proposed dwelling respects the character and appearance of the Conservation Area, the wider landscape, Gower AONB, street scene and the amenity of neighbouring properties.

The original plans were amended by reducing the height of the dwelling, incorporating alterations to the pattern of fenestration and a revised siting lower in the plot. As such in visual amenity terms it is considered that the proposed dwelling makes a significant and positive contribution to the character and appearance of the area. It is considered that the basic approach of single storey elements and its level break up the massing of the proposed dwelling. The level of the land to the rear dictates that the proposed dwelling will be split level in design and appearance and will result in the introduction of a traditional property of substance which will, it is considered, enhance the character and appearance of both the street-scene, the wider Gower AONB and the protected Conservation Area. It is considered that the dwelling incorporates a scale, height and massing which is comparable with other dwellings in the immediate vicinity and its revised siting at a lower level will ensure the proposal will not be significantly prominent or domineering when viewed from wider public vantage points. It is considered that given the high quality of materials proposed and its design that the proposal is considered appropriate in its wider setting. Furthermore it should also be noted that a number of dwellings in this part of Horton are highly prominent from the coast and as such the development will not appear out of keeping with the character and appearance of the landscape. As such the dwelling is considered to make a positive contribution to the area and complies with the principles of Policies EV1, EV2, EV9, EV16 and EV26 of the Swansea UDP. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 7 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2008/0447

Turning to residential amenities, the revised siting is in a similar position to the neighbouring Underhill Cottage and as such will not result in unacceptable overbearing or overshadowing upon the residential amenities of the neighbouring properties. The proposal will be sited towards the north-west of The Retreat and as such will not result in unacceptable overbearing or overshadowing upon this property. In terms of overlooking, the east and north facing elevations of the proposed dwelling will overlook the amenity area of the proposed property and as such will not raise unacceptable overlooking issues. The south facing elevation will face towards the gardens of The Retreat and No3 Underhill Lane and the ground floor windows in this elevation will not unacceptably overlook the neighbours. With regard the 1st floor fenestration, these 1st floor windows are at a significantly higher level than the Retreat and No3 Underhill Lane and this coupled with the separation distances from the boundaries of some 7m will ensure the proposal will not directly overlook the private amenity space of these neighbouring properties and as such is considered acceptable. With regard the balcony area, a privacy screen is proposed on the west facing elevation which will mitigate against unacceptable overlooking towards Underhill Cottage. The south facing views from the balcony area will not directly overlook the private residential area of the neighbouring dwellings given the differing land levels and separation distances. It is therefore considered that the proposal complies with Policies EV1 and EV16 of the Swansea UDP.

Having consulted the Head of Transportation and Engineering the amended plans indicate in more detail the site layout and confirm that the existing access which is being utilised is already set back from the edge of the highway. New accesses are required to be set back by 5m and this access is set back less than that, however it is already in existence and has adequate visibility and it is considered unnecessary to require its alteration. No highway objections are raised.

Two letters of comment were received from a neighbour and the Gower Society regarding the proposals potential impact upon the Conservation Area and Gower AONB, impact upon the wider landscape, potential overdevelopment of the site. The issues pertaining to which have been addressed in the main body of my report. A subsequent letter was received from the Gower Society acknowledging the merit of the amendments.

Concern has been raised regarding a neighbour not receiving a consultation letter. All immediately adjoining neighbours were consulted, the application was advertised in the press and on site in the form of a site notice.

In conclusion, and having regard to all material considerations including the Human Rights Act, it is considered that the proposal represents an acceptable form of infill development which respects the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and the wider Gower AONB whilst at the same time introducing a traditional dwelling which conserves the protected area. The proposal has been carefully designed to ensure that the development does not have an unacceptable impact upon the residential amenities of the neighbouring occupiers and as such it is considered that it complies with Policies EV1, EV2, EV9, EV16 and EV26 of the Swansea UDP. Approval is therefore recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following condition(s): AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 7 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2008/0447

1 The development shall be commenced not later than the expiration of 5 years from the date of this planning permission and shall be completed in accordance with the said application plans and conditions prior to any part thereof being brought into beneficial use, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1990 and to ensure that the development is completed in accordance with the plans approved by the City and County of Swansea, and so avoid any detriment to amenity or public safety by works remaining uncompleted.

2 Samples of all external finishes shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority in writing before the development is commenced. The scheme shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity.

3 Notwithstanding the provisions of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995, (or any Order revoking or amending that Order), Classes A, B, C and D of Part 1 of Schedule 2 shall not apply. Reason: The development hereby approved is such that the Council wish to retain control over any future development being permitted in order to ensure that a satisfactory form of development is achieved at all times.

4 Before the development hereby permitted is first brought into beneficial use a 2m high obscurely glazed privacy screen shall be erected on the balcony along the west facing boundary facing Underhill Cottage, in accordance with details to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The boundary screening shall thereafter be maintained in the condition as approved unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interest of residential amenity.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: (Policies EV1, EV2, EV3, EV9, EV16 and EV26).

2 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

3 Birds may be present in the roof of this building please note it is an offence under the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) to intentionally (intentionally or recklessly for Schedule 1 birds) to: - Kill, injure or take any wild bird - Take, damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird while that nest in use or being built - Take or destroy an egg of any wild bird Care should be taken when working on buildings particularly during the bird nesting season March-August.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 7 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2008/0447

4 Foul water and surface water discharges shall be drained separately from the site.

Reason: To protect the integrity of the public sewerage system.

No surface water shall be allowed to connect, either directly or indirectly, to the public sewerage system unless otherwise approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.

Reason: To protect hydraulic overloading of the public sewerage system, to protect the health and safety of existing residents and ensure no detriment to the environment.

Land drainage run-off shall not be permitted to discharge, either directly or indirectly, into the public sewerage system.

Reason: To prevent hydraulic overload of the public sewerage system and pollution of the environment.

The proposed development site is crossed by a public sewer with the approximate position being marked on the Statutory Public Sewer Record. Under the Water Industry Act 1991 Dwr Cymru Welsh Water has rights of access to it apparatus at all times. No part of the building will be permitted within 3 metres either side of the centreline of the public sewer.

Reason: To protect the integrity of the public sewer and avoid damage thereto.

If a connection is required to the public sewerage system, the developer is advised to contact Dwr Cymru Welsh Water's Network Development Consultants on 01443 331155.

PLANS

144B/706, 144B/705, 144B/702, 144B/701, 144B/710, 144B/704, 144B/607 dated 6th January 2010.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 8 APPLICATION NO. 2009/0772 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Talgarths Well, Middleton, Swansea, SA3 1PJ Proposal: Retention and completion of detached garage with storage area, associated landscaping works and retaining wall Applicant: Mr Derek O' Brien

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV1 New development shall accord with a defined set of criteria of good design. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 82/0363/03 DEMOLISH AND REBUILD DWELLING (BUNGALOW) Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 21/07/1982

2007/0852 Amendment to planning permission 2003/0293 for a replacement dwelling and detached garage granted 3rd June 2003, namely alterations to front porch and fenestration. Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 26/06/2007

2003/0292 Demolition of existing house and garage with construction of new detached dwelling with detached garage (Application for Conservation Area Consent) Decision: Withdrawn Decision Date: 24/02/2003

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 8 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0772

2003/0293 Replacement dwelling and detached garage Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 03/06/2003

2005/1391 Variation of conditions 4 6 and 9 of planning permission 2003/0293 granted on 3rd June 2003 Decision: Approve Conditional (S73) Decision Date: 01/08/2006

2003/0107 Two storey rear extension with rear balcony Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 23/05/2003

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

Original scheme – ‘Retention of detached garage’

Three properties were consulted; one letter of objection has been received from a neighbouring property, the comments of which are outlined below –

1. The building is in contravention of the Council’s Strategic Policy in being detrimental to the environment and a protected landscape.

2. The primary use of the structure in question is not considered to be for the use of a garage, it has no vehicular access and incorporates French doors, a catflap, solar panels and appears to have 2 stories even 3 if the dormer windows are attic space.

3. The building is considered to be obtrusive and disproportionate, it would be a scar on the landscape, its distance from the main dwelling house and its height and shape makes it appear a separate development to the main house. Its roofline, when viewed, from the coastal path is above the hill’s horizon making it very prominent on the hillside and subsequently spoils the views from surrounding coastal paths.

4. It is not on the site of the original dwelling house.

5. To the best of our recollection it was not a part of the original plans for the house and we would have objected to it at the time if consulted.

6. To override the Council’s decision on the grounds that ‘the steps required to comply with the requirements are excessive’ would be an abuse of the democratic process. It would undermine the Council’s effectiveness as a planning authority and set a precedent that – once built anything goes. I believe that the plans at Talgarth Well may previously have been subject of retrospective permission; if so, how many times can this be done without bringing the whole process into disrepute?

7. The owners should have been aware of local disquiet over size and impact of the house on the local environment through the initial planning process and the objections of neighbours to the destruction of the trees on the site. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 8 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0772

8. Gower is an area of outstanding natural beauty and deserves special protection. It’s rural character is already under pressure due to the proliferation of fences, shingle tracks, hard-standings and stables as farmers sell off agricultural land for recreational use of horse riders, over which the planning process seems to have little control.

9. There are also concerns raised in relation to the size and shape of the main dwelling house. We registered our concerns at the time, although we did not formally object. In the event what has been built is a disproportionately large house which dominates the hillside and can be seen for miles. It is wholly unsympathetic to the surrounding landscape – a jumble of angles and rooflines.

Gower Society – The development is indisputably in a most conspicuous position in an elevated position within the Gower AONB.

The domestic garage stands proud of the surrounding area; we query whether the floor slab level is as shown on the original drawings. Also, we ask if the total height from floor slab to ridge is also in compliance. We do note the extensive paved area adjacent to the house is shown as 33.46m, while the garage is at 37m. In our opinion the garage should have been closer to the house and at the same level i.e. 3.5m lower and much less conspicuous.

The garage appears to have been constructed with a possible domestic occupancy in mind; whatever your decision regarding the actual structure, we consider that there should be a condition preventing this i.e. it remains solely to be used as a domestic garage.

The basement room, as constructed, is an addition and clearly at odds with the approved drawings. However, the drawings submitted with this application show no indication of this basement, no internal structure and no dimensions. The site plan and the block plan are the same drawing with the same drawing number. In our opinion the drawings are inadequate for their purpose.

The solar panels do not help the visual impact from the South; why are they required for a garage? Their purpose is not indicated. They appear to be for hot water but two are usually sufficient for this purpose. Is such hot water to be used in a house which is 6 metres away?

The photographs supplied with the application show the vehicle entrance partly blocked with a panel of some sort, and what appears to be a patio door (or something similar) fitted to the remainder. The drawings show a vehicular door – this should be fitted if the garage is approved. The vehicle door should be grey to blend in with the walls. We also note that the windows differ from those in the drawing – they appear to be more suitable for a domestic dwelling. Has their position/size been altered?

It is regrettable that the original small inconspicuous residence that organically merged into the hillside has been replaced by this harsh and dominant development. This will be further exacerbated by the fact that the structures still has to be painted white. However, we note that the garage is now indicated as being stone clad – this would be less conspicuous. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 8 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0772

We ask that you view the offending garage development from the main road at Pitton, the track leading to Alverley above Great Pitton Farm, the Wales Coastal Footpath on the headland either side of Mewslade Bay. The photographs included with the application show how conspicuous the development already is, but it is worse from other vantage points.

We have no alternative but to object to this application as the garage appears to have been built not according to the original Application 2005/1391. We also consider it procedurally inappropriate to submit/accept an application whilst an Appeal is ongoing.

Rhossili Community Council – The plans as submitted are for a single storey garage, and do not correspond to what has already been built as it is currently built on two levels and does not have an opening to admit a car. Does that mean that the current building will be demolished and a new build constructed as per plans within this application?

If the plan is to cover the first floor of the building with an embankment to create a basement, we would question how this is to be achieved and why there is a door opening into this area at the current ground level? If an embankment is going to cover this door, how will the basement be accessed in the future is not detailed on the plans.

The finish on the proposed garage is not described in detail and any finish should match that of the house.

Amended scheme – ‘Retention and completion of detached garage with storage area, associated landscaping works and retaining wall’

Three neighbouring properties were re-consulted; one objection has been received from a neighbouring property, the comments of which are outlined below –

1. I have scrutinised the amendments online and I cannot see that a material affect on mitigating the impact of this building I would, therefore, object to this building for the reasons already detailed at length on the basis of it being unnecessarily intrusive in an area of outstanding natural beauty.

Gower Society – This garage is in a most conspicuous position.

The revised tree planting will eventually conceal the walls but there is no guarantee that this will be either successful, or indeed be maintained.

The revised stone walls with the increased height may be conspicuous but the landscaping may eventually conceal these.

The solar panels will always be conspicuous; we query why they are required on a garage.

It is essential that any future domestic occupancy of this structure is prevented by suitable caveat.

We are unable to determine from the plans (that were available to us) whether the garage is constructed higher than the original proposals. We have always maintained that this garage could have been concealed better – if constructed at a lower level and closer to the residence. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 8 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0772

We accept that the changes made seem to be an improvement on the earlier application, but we remain greatly concerned about the inevitable impact that this garage has on the landscape, and we maintain our objection to this development.

Highway observations – There are no highway safety implications with this garage retention. I recommend no highway objection.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

The application seeks consent for the retention and completion of a detached garage with storage area which will be located below the main floor area of the garage and will be accessed from in side the garage. The associated landscaping works relates to proposed planting to be situated around the garage and the retaining wall will run around the southern part of the garage and will reach a maximum height of approximately 1.6m. The application site is located at Talgarth’s Well near Middleton, Gower. The site lies on the south-eastern slopes of Rhossili Down and occupies a prominent and elevated position in the landscape.

A replacement dwelling and detached garage was approved at the site under application 2003/0293. Following this application 2005/1391 was approved for the variation of conditions 4, 6 and 9 of planning permission 2003/0293, these conditions related to details of levels, landscaping and the siting of the domestic curtilage. Subsequent to this an application (2007/0852) was submitted and approved for amendments to the existing planning permission for the replacement dwelling and a detached garage, namely alterations to the front porch and fenestration. An enforcement notice was issued with regard to the garage on the 26th March 2009. An appeal was subsequently lodged against this notice; this is currently held in abeyance.

It should be highlighted that the proposed garage differs from the garage approved under the 2003/0293 application in so far as it includes a basement area and includes a greater height and length. The structure approved in 2003 was approximately 4.2m in height by 5.4m in length and the proposed garage is approximately 6.6m in height by 7m in length. The issue regarding the height of the garage will, however, be partially mitigated by the raising in land levels to the south and east of the garage and the landscaping works to be carried out surrounding the structure.

Amendments were sought in relation to raising the levels around the garage and providing additional landscaping works surrounding the garage to ensure that the garage will be viewed as a single storey structure rather than a two storey structure which would be the case if the garage remained as it stands. The landscaping would also provide screening for the structure to minimise its impact. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 8 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0772

The main issues to be considered with regard to this application are the visual impact of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the dwelling and the surrounding area within the Gower AONB and sensitive countryside location and the impact on the residential amenity of the occupiers of the neighbouring properties having regard to Policies EV1, EV22 and EV26 of the Unitary Development Plan and the Supplementary Planning Guidance document entitled Design Guide for Householder Development. There are in this case considered to be no additional overriding issues for consideration having regard to the provisions of the Human Rights Act.

In terms of visual amenity, the proposed garage whilst located in a prominent position is considered to be acceptable given the amendments made to the proposals including the raising in levels and landscaping works which are considered to ensure that the proposal will be viewed as a less dominant feature within the context of the surrounding area. The scale and design of the garage is considered to be in keeping with the surrounding area and is relative to the design and proportions of the existing dwelling. The information on the application forms indicates that the walls of the garage will comprise of natural stone and that a slate tile for the roof will be used to match the main house. The garage has for the most been constructed, however, a condition is included to require samples of the walling materials for the garage to be submitted prior to the beneficial occupation of the garage to ensure sympathetic materials are utilised. There will also be a condition included to ensure that the garage is retained for parking of vehicles, general storage and purposes incidental to that use and shall not be converted to domestic living accommodation. The landscaping works and retaining wall are not considered to give rise to any detrimental visual impact given their sympathetic scale and siting. Furthermore, the proposals are considered to comply with Policy EV26 of the Unitary Development Plan which seeks to conserve and enhance the natural beauty of the Gower AONB.

In terms of residential amenity, the site lies in a relatively remote location with no neighbouring properties within close proximity of the proposed works. As such the proposals are not considered to have an impact on any neighbouring properties by way of either overbearance, overshadowing or overlooking.

In terms of highway safety issues, the Head of Transportation and Engineering Services has stated that there are no highway safety implications with this garage retention and, therefore, no highway objections are raised. The public footpath near this development has been officially diverted so is not affected by the development.

With regard to the concerns raised, all the relevant policies have been taken account of and as such the proposals are considered to be in keeping with the relevant policies. Whilst there are concerns that the garage will be used for other activities other than for vehicle uses, this can be controlled through the imposition of an appropriate condition restricting its use. Whilst the structure is considered to be located within a prominent position it is not considered to have a detrimental impact on the surrounding area given its sympathetic scale and design. With regard to it not being located on the site of the original dwelling, the garage is located within the agreed domestic curtilage and its siting is therefore considered to be satisfactory. As stated in the report the garage does differ from the garage approved under the 2003/0293 application, however, as specified, the proposed garage is not considered to have a harmful impact. The fact that the application is retrospective should not have a bearing on the outcome. As stated in the report it has been acknowledged that the application site is situated within the Gower AONB and the proposals are not considered to have a detrimental impact on this sensitive area. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 8 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0772

The issues raised in relation to the dwelling house on site are not considered relevant in this instance as the application relates solely to the garage and associated landscaping works and retaining wall. With regard to the slab levels, the slab level of the garage indicated on the proposed plans with this application are similar to those levels indicated on the plans previously approved and are, therefore, considered acceptable in this instance. Regarding the accuracy of plans, the amended plans now show the basement room and the other plans accompanied with this application are considered to be sufficient to determine this application. There is considered to be no reason why solar panels are not acceptable at this location and as such are not considered to be unacceptable given the minimal impact. The fenestration included within the proposed plans is considered to replicate the fenestration elsewhere on site. With regard to the use of materials, as stated in the report, a condition will be imposed requiring details of walling materials to be submitted. There have been concerns raised that the structure can be viewed from many vantage points, whilst this may be the case, for the reasons already discussed this does not make the development unacceptable.

In conclusion and having regard to all material considerations, it is considered that the proposals are satisfactory and will respect the character and appearance of the host dwelling and the surrounding area and the residential amenities of neighbours. Therefore, it is considered that the proposals comply with Policies EV1, EV22 and EV26 of the Unitary Development Plan and the Design Guide for Householder Development.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions;

1 The garage and associated landscaping and retaining works shall be completed in accordance with the said application plans and conditions prior to the garage being brought into beneficial use and thereafter retained as such, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To ensure that the development is completed in accordance with the plans approved by the City and County of Swansea, and in the interest of the amenities of the surrounding area.

2 The garage indicated in the submitted plans shall be retained for the parking of vehicles, general storage and purposes incidental to that use and shall not be used as or converted to domestic living accommodation. Reason: In order to safeguard the residential amenities of the area and in order to prevent the establishment of an unrelated and/or independent unit on the site.

3 Prior to the beneficial occupation of the garage, samples of the external finishes for the walls and door of the garage hereby approved shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The development shall be completed in accordance with the approved details and shall be retained and maintained as such unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 8 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0772

4 Notwithstanding the plans hereby permitted this permission relates to the garage and associated landscaping and retaining works only. Reason: For the avoidance of doubt.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: (Policies EV1, EV22 and EV26 of the Unitary Development Plan)

2 Birds may be present in the roof of this building please note it is an offence under the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) to intentionally (intentionally or recklessly for Schedule 1 birds) to: - Kill, injure or take any wild bird - Take, damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird while that nest in use or being built - Take or destroy an egg of any wild bird Care should be taken when working on buildings particularly during the bird nesting season March-August.

PLANS

Additional plan HG.04.58.100 Rev A existing site sections received 9th December 2009. Amended plans HG.04.58.GP Rev A garage plans, HG/04.58/01 Rev B site layout plan, HG.04.58.101 Rev B proposed site sections, HG.04.58.BP Rev A block plan, HG.04.58.LP Rev A location plan received 8th February 2010.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 9 APPLICATION NO. 2009/0783 WARD: Gowerton Area 2

Location: 22 Porth Y Waun, Gowerton, Swansea, SA4 3BJ Proposal: Part two part first floor side/front extension and change of use of land to form part of residential curtilage Applicant: Mr G Lloyd

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy HC7 Proposals for extensions and alterations to existing residential dwellings will be assess in terms of; relationship to the existing dwelling, impact on the character and appearance of the streetscene, effect on neighbouring properties, and impact on car parking. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV1 New development shall accord with a defined set of criteria of good design. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

Policy HC23 Development proposals that involve the loss of land for community recreation purposes will only be permitted where they comply with a defined set of criteria. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal LV/88/0384/03 DEVELOPMENT OF 319 RESIDENTIAL UNITS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 15/09/1988

LV/86/0177/01 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 24/06/1986

LV/86/0515/01 WESTERN AND EASTERN RESIDENTIAL AREAS - RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, ACCESS ROAD AND OPEN SPACE Decision: *HGDP - GRANT DEEMED PERMISSION Decision Date: 13/01/1987

LV/79/0264/01 EISTEDDFOD FIELD ETC Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 26/06/1979

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 9 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0783

LV/79/0407/02 ERECTION OF MAIN PAVILION, ARTS AND CRAFTS PAVILION AND OTHER TEMPORARY BUILDINGS COMMENCING AUGUST 1979 AND DISMANTLING OCTOBER 1980 CARAVAN PARK FOR 2 WEEKS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 18/03/1979

LV/82/0114/01 OPEN AIR MARKET Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/06/1982

2008/0757 Part two part first floor side/front extension and change of use of land to form part of residential curtilage Decision: Withdrawn Decision Date: 31/07/2008

2007/0382 Two storey side/front extension Decision: Withdrawn Decision Date: 03/04/2007

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The neighbouring properties were consulted; no correspondence has been received in respect of the proposal.

Highway Observations – Three parking spaces are indicated within the curtilage of the site. This is the maximum requirement for a residential dwelling. I recommend that no highway objections are raised.

APPLICANT’S STATEMENT

“In March 1994 I purchased 22 Porth Y Waun, Gowerton, at that time there was a parcel of wasteland between our boundary and the public footpath, there were several mounds of building waste which had been deposited there, and this was covered over by long grass, brambles and weeds.

We noticed that many people using the foot path were allowing their dogs to use this area to relieve themselves, consequently there was a build up of excrement, and the odour was appalling especially during the warm summer period.

In March 1995 my then 5 year old Daughter, Jamie Molly was diagnosed with Cancer and had to undergo 4 years of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy. I was advised by the Consultant Dr David Webb at Llandough Hospital, Cardiff, to keep Jamie away from Dogs, Cats, Pets, and animal excrement, because of her weak immune system.

Following this advice I had the long grass, brambles, and weeds cleared along with all the animal waste, and for the summer of 1995 maintained the parcel of land clearing the animal waste on a twice daily basis. The owners of the animals showed a total disregard for the mess their pets were creating and made no attempt to clean up after them. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 9 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0783

As it became clear that this parcel of land was never going to be maintained by the Council and after keeping it maintained myself for several months, I then fenced it off with a four foot wire fence to prevent the animals from fouling the area any more. This fence was erected in late September 1995 and I have maintained the land ever since. Eventually I purchased this land, which now forms part of my Planning Application.”

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Susan Mary Jones.

Full planning permission is sought for the construction of a part two storey, part first floor side/front extension and change of use of land to form part of the residential curtilage at No.22 Porth y Waun, Gowerton. The property is detached and occupies a modest plot at the hammerhead of a close development in an established residential area.

The applicant acquired a parcel of land to the north of the residential curtilage from the Local Authority on 11th June 2004. The land purchased provided a wooded buffer between what was the original curtilage of the property and the curtain of informal recreation space forming the perimeter of the Elba Recreation Ground.

An informal footpath runs parallel but outside of the new boundary which since being acquired has been fenced off and now effectively forms part of the garden area. On disposal the Local Authority placed several covenants on this land the Third Schedule Section (a) of which states Not to use the Property or permit the same to be used:- “Other than as a private domestic garden and not to erect any building thereon other than a garden shed greenhouse or other building for use as ancillary to a private dwelling.” These covenants are a civil matter and play no part in the determination of this application.

Planning permission has, however, never been granted for the change of use of this land to domestic curtilage.

The main issues for consideration with regard to this application relate to the impact of the proposal upon visual and residential amenities when considered against Policies HC7 and EV1 and the loss of public recreation space in respect of policy HC23 of the City and County of Swansea and the Supplementary Planning Guidance document entitled A Design Guide for Householder Development. There are in this case considered to be no additional issues arising from the provisions of the Human Rights Act, nor are there any highway safety issues to consider.

In respect of issues of visual amenity, the proposed scheme incorporates a design which fails, it is considered, to comply with the design principles outlined in the Supplementary Planning Guidance document entitled, “A Design Guide for Householder Development”. In this respect whilst the extension is set down from the existing ridgeline and set back from the front elevation of the main dwelling it is considered to be excessively wide. The Design Guide for Householder Development states that a side extension should be no greater than one-half of the frontage. This would give a maximum width of some 4.25 metres, the proposal has a width of 6.2 metres and as such the extension will, it is considered, fail to respect the proportions of the host dwelling proving detrimental to both the character of the dwelling and the associated street scene when viewed from public vantage points within the road. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 9 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0783

The proposal therefore fails to comply with the Supplementary Planning Guidance document entitled A Design Guide for Householder Development and the associated policies EV1 and HC23 of the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008.

The proposal also seeks planning permission for the retention of the use of part of the land upon which the extension will be sited and an area of land located along the side boundary to the north of the dwelling as domestic curtilage. The land was acquired by the applicant approximately 5 years ago and has been fenced to form part of the residential curtilage for this period. An officer site visit has confirmed that the recreational land was being used as residential amenity space and it is considered that the incorporation of this land gives rise to a deleterious impact upon the visual amenity and character of the surrounding area. It is considered that this landscaping strip provided an important visual break, introducing an area of greenery which contributes positively towards the character and appearance of the area. Policy HC23 reinforces that such sites make a significant contribution to the character and environmental quality of an area. No alternative provision of replacement land and no justification has been provided as part of the proposal.

Incorporation of this area of land into the residential curtilage, together with the associated re-siting of the boundary would appear visually intrusive, resulting in the partial loss of the landscaping area to the detriment of the character and appearance of the street scene and the surrounding area. It is also considered that the approval of this application would set an undesirable precedent for future developments of a similar nature in the area, the cumulative impact of which would have a further detrimental visual impact upon the surrounding area and would lead to the unjustified erosion of the recreation land which forms part of the Elba Recreation Ground.

Turning to residential amenity it is considered that given the siting of the proposed scheme with no immediate neighbours to this side elevation it is considered that there would be no impacts of an overshadowing, overlooking or overbearing nature that would be sufficient to justify a recommendation of refusal.

In conclusion, having regard to all material considerations including the Human Rights Act, the proposal is considered to represent an unsatisfactory form of development which fails to comply with current development plan Policies HC7, EV1 and HC23 of the City and County of Swansea and the Supplementary Planning Guidance document entitled A Design Guide for Householder Development and as such has an unacceptable impact on the character and visual amenities of the streetscene and area in which it is situated and on this basis refusal is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

REFUSE, for the following reasons:

1 The proposed extension by virtue of its scale and design would be out of keeping with and detrimental to the character of the existing dwelling and the visual amenities of the streetscene contrary to the provisions of Policies EV1 and HC7 of the Swansea Unitary Development Plan and the Design Guide for Householder Development.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 9 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/0783

2 The proposal represents the unjustified change of use of an area of recreation ground into the residential curtilage of 22 Porth Y Waun which is detrimental to the visual amenities of the area and gives rise to the unjustified loss of community recreation land contrary to Policies EV1 and HC23 of the Swansea Unitary Development Plan.

3 Approval of this application would set an undesirable precedent for similar developments in the area, the cumulative impact of which would have a significant visual impact upon the overall character and appearance of the surrounding area and lead to the erosion of the Elba Recreation Ground contrary to the provisions of Policies EV1 and HC23 of the Swansea Unitary Development Plan.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EV1, HC7 and HC3

PLANS

001 Site location & block plan, 002 existing elevations & floor plans, 003 proposed elevations, 004 proposed floor plans received 22nd May 2009

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 10 APPLICATION NO. 2009/1696 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Driftwood, Oxwich, Swansea, SA3 1LS Proposal: Two storey side extension with front and side canopies and external alterations Applicant: Mr Andrew Fowkes

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV1 New development shall accord with a defined set of criteria of good design. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

Policy EV9 Development within or adjacent to a Conservation Area will only be permitted if it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area or its setting. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV16 Within the small villages identified on the Proposals Map, small-scale development will be approved only where it is appropriate to the location in terms of the defined criteria. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy HC7 Proposals for extensions and alterations to existing residential dwellings will be assess in terms of; relationship to the existing dwelling, impact on the character and appearance of the streetscene, effect on neighbouring properties, and impact on car parking. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2009/0355 Two storey side extension Decision: Refuse Decision Date: 30/04/2009

2001/0913 Detached garage Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 03/08/2001

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 10 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1696

89/1699/03 CHANGE OF USE TO A GUEST HOUSE Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 14/02/1990

89/6133/06 BED + BREAKFAST SIGN. Decision: *HRC - REFUSE CONSENT Decision Date: 29/04/1992

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

Neighbours: This application was advertised in the press as development within a Conservation Area and on site in the form of a site notice and neighbouring occupiers were individually consulted. No letters of objection were received.

Glamorgan Gwent Archaeological Trust – No objection.

Highways Observations - Adequate parking is provided within the garage and on the garage forecourt. I recommend no highway objection.

APPRAISAL:

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Full planning permission is sought for the construction of a two-storey side extension with front and side canopies at Driftwood, Oxwich, Swansea. The existing dwelling is part of a pair of semi-detached properties situated within the village of Oxwich and within both the protected Oxwich Conservation Area and the wider Gower AONB.

In terms of planning history, planning permission was refused for a two storey side extension as it was considered that the proposed extension by virtue of its height, width, design and size was disproportionate to and at odds with the character and appearance of the existing dwelling, the pair of semi-detached dwellings, the street-scene, Conservation Area and wider Gower AONB, contrary to the provisions of the Development Plan and the Design Guide. A significant amount of pre-application discussions have taken place with a view to achieving an acceptable design solution and the current application has been submitted in order to try and overcome the concerns expressed with the previous refusal.

The main issues for consideration during the determination of this application are the impact of the proposal upon the character and appearance of the existing dwelling, the pair of semi-detached properties to which it relates, the Conservation Area and Gower AONB together with impact upon highway safety and the residential amenities of the neighbouring occupiers having regard for the previous refusal and the provisions of the Unitary Development Plan. It is not considered that the provisions of the Human Rights Act raise any additional issues.

Whilst this pair of semi-detached dwellings have been extended unsympathetically in the past, the pair still retain a certain amount of symmetry. In this respect any extension to this property should relate to and be proportionate with the host dwelling. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 10 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1696

The proposed alterations would involve the introduction of a two storey extension to the side (with front canopy) and a rear extension incorporating a rear gable and side canopy and alterations to the façade of the existing dwelling. The width of this extension has been reduced in line with the Design Guide to approximately half the width of the existing dwelling. This reduction ensures the extension is proportionate to and in keeping with the character and appearance of the existing property in line with the principles of Policies EV1 and HC7 of the Swansea UDP and the Design Guide.

The proposal involves alterations to the design of the existing dwelling elements of which will be incorporated into the design and character of the proposed extension. The existing dwelling has been unsympathetically extended in the past and the proposal will provide an opportunity to enhance the character and appearance of the dwelling, street-scene and Conservation Area by removing the incongruous west facing elevation and introducing a development which adds interest to the Conservation Area fundamentally improving the built environment. As such the extension would appear as a positive addition to the street- scene, which has an acceptable relationship with the existing dwelling and incorporates a set down and set back from the main façade making the extension appear subordinate to the main dwelling. It is considered, therefore, that the proposed extension would have a positive impact upon the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the pair of semi-detached dwellings to the benefit of the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and the wider Gower AONB. Materials will play an important role in the success of the finished scheme and as such a condition is recommended requiring the submission of all samples prior to the commencement of work. As such the proposal complies with Policies EV9, EV26, EV1, EV16 and HC7 of the Swansea UDP and the Design Guide.

Turning to impact upon residential amenity, the proposed extension is set well away from the boundaries with the adjoining neighbouring properties and as such the proposal would not result in unacceptable overbearing or overshadowing impacts which would be detrimental to the residential amenities of the neighbouring occupiers. Turning to overlooking, apart from a rear east facing window which can be conditioned obscurely glazed and fixed shut, it is not considered that the extension would result in unacceptable overlooking over and above what is currently experienced. Whilst the alterations to the frontage of the existing dwelling will see the first floor windows raised in elevation, given the combination of distance, the intervening carriageway and existing boundary enclosures it is considered that no harmful overlooking would be caused to the occupiers of ‘Asmara’ opposite. As such the development in residential amenity terms is considered acceptable.

In terms of impact upon highway safety, the Head of Transportation and Engineering has no objections to raise in this instance.

In conclusion and having regard to all material planning considerations including the Human Rights Act, the proposed extensions and alterations would, by virtue of their size, design and massing, result in the introduction of acceptable additions which have a positive impact upon the character and appearance of the existing dwelling, the pair of semi-detached dwellings, the street-scene, Conservation Area and the surrounding AONB. Therefore the proposal is considered to be an acceptable form of development, which is in compliance with Policies EV1, EV9, EV16, HC7, EV22 and EV26 of the Swansea UDP and the Supplementary Planning Guidance document entitled A Design Guide for Householder Development. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 10 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1696

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following condition(s):

1 The development shall be commenced not later than the expiration of 5 years from the date of this planning permission and shall be completed in accordance with the said application plans and conditions prior to any part thereof being brought into beneficial use, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1990 and to ensure that the development is completed in accordance with the plans approved by the City and County of Swansea, and so avoid any detriment to amenity or public safety by works remaining uncompleted.

2 Notwithstanding the approved plans samples of all external finishes shall be submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority in writing before the development is commenced. The scheme shall be implemented in accordance with the approved details. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity.

3 The first floor window in the east facing elevation, as indicated on the approved plan shall be obscure glazed, and unopenable except for a fan light and shall be retained as such unless otherwise agreed in writing with the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To safeguard the privacy of the occupiers of neighbouring residential properties.

4 No further windows, doors or openings shall be inserted in the east facing elevation of the extension unless otherwise approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To safeguard the privacy of the occupiers of neighbouring residential properties.

INFORMATIVES

1 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

2 Whilst the information held in the Historic Environment Record that is curated by the Glamorgan Gwent Archaeological Trust indicates that there are no recorded archaeological features within the application are, the record is not definitive, however, and features may be disturbed during the course of the work. In this event, please contact the Glamorgan Gwent Archaeological Trust on Tel: 01792 655208.

3 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: (EV1, EV9, EV16, EV26 and HC7)

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 10 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2009/1696

PLANS

Existing floor plans and elevations received 16th November 2009. Amended plans: site location plan, block plan, proposed floor plans, proposed elevations dated 5th January 2010.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 11 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0003 WARD: Oystermouth Area 2

Location: 626 Mumbles Road Mumbles Swansea SA3 4EA Proposal: Change of use of ground floor from pottery shop (Class A1) to cafe/restaurant (Class A3) Applicant: Mr & Mrs Adam & Anna Robertson

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV1 New development shall accord with a defined set of criteria of good design. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

Policy EV9 Development within or adjacent to a Conservation Area will only be permitted if it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area or its setting. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV40 Development proposals will not be permitted that would cause or result in significant harm to health, local amenity, natural heritage, the historic environment or landscape character because of significant levels of air, noise or light pollution. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy AS6 Provision of car parking in accordance with adopted standards. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV2 The siting of new development shall give preference to the use of previously developed land and have regard to the physical character and topography of the site and its surroundings. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 98/0552 CHANGE OF USE OF GROUND FLOOR FROM GUEST HOUSE (CLASS C1) TO RETAIL SHOP (CLASS A1) WITH MAISONETTE ON FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS AND ERECTION OF TWO STOREY REAR EXTENSION Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 02/06/1998

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 11 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0003

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site and in the Press as development within a Conservation Area and neighbour consulted. No responses have been received.

Environment Agency – No objection subject to advice about flood risk and surface water run-off.

Welsh Water – No objection subject to conditions/informatives.

Highways Observations - This proposal is to convert the existing shop to a Café/Restaurant. The premises are located at the junction of Village Lane with Mumbles Road and do not benefit from any on site parking for customers. Any customers visiting the premises therefore have to park on-street or in public car parks in the vicinity.

The existing shop whilst generating custom is likely to generate fewer customers than the proposal as the current use is more of a specialised nature. Customer parking would continue to have to be accommodated in public parking facilities either in the nearby car parks or within on-street spaces. The A3 use applied for also includes takeaway facilities and I would be concerned that this type of use could result in parking demand along the frontage in contravention of existing restrictions, as the short term demand for this use often results in customers parking inappropriately. In similar situations elsewhere, consideration has been given to imposing a restriction on takeaway use requiring the sale of hot food for consumption on the premises only and whilst this is not always successful in discouraging inappropriate parking, the presence of kerbside parking and the public car park in the vicinity of the premises would likely be used.

On balance therefore, I recommend that if consent is granted, a condition is imposed removing Takeaway use from the A3 use applied for.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to committee for decision at the request of Councillor Anthony Colburne.

Full planning permission is sought for the change of use of part of the ground floor from a Pottery Shop (Class A1) to café/restaurant (Class A3) at 626 Mumbles Road, Mumbles, Swansea. The application property is an end of terrace property situated at the junction of Village Lane with Mumbles Road. Although situated outside the defined Mumbles District centre, this stretch of Mumbles Road has a concentration of commercial uses, many of which operate within Class A3 (food and drink)of the Town and Country Planning Use Classes Order (1987). It is also part of the Mumbles Conservation Area.

The main issues for consideration in this instance relate to the acceptability of the use at this location and the potential impact of the application upon the visual and residential amenity of the area together with highway safety standards having regard to Policies EV1, EV2, EV9, EV40 and AS6 of the Swansea Unitary Development Plan.

The application property is a traditional Victorian end of terrace property with a traditional timber shop-front to the ground floor. No external alterations are proposed and as such the proposal is considered to preserve the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 11 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0003

It is inevitable that should consent be forthcoming the fascia signage will be replaced; however, the local planning authority will exercise further control over this under the control of advertisements regulations.

The current authorised use of the premises is as a retail outlet; however there are many Class A3 outlets in the immediate vicinity of the site together with Class A1 retail outlets. The entire frontage from 626 Mumbles Road to 612 and beyond is dedicated to commercial activity. On this basis, it is not considered that a refusal of the application can be justified in land use terms given the established mixed use nature of the locality. It is noted that to the south (rear) of the property the area gives way to a more residential environment, however, given the relatively small scale of the premises, it is not considered that the proposal will result in a level of activity over and above that already established in the vicinity to the detriment of local residents’ amenities. Furthermore, the Head of Environmental Management and Protection raises no objection to the proposal subject to compliance with a standard ventilation condition. However, in the interest of ensuring the amenities of nearby residents are entirely safeguarded, it is also considered appropriate to impose a condition limiting the hours of operation.

As stated earlier the premises are located at the junction of Village Lane with Mumbles Road and does not benefit from any on site parking for customers. Any customers visiting the premises therefore have to park on-street or in public car parks in the vicinity.

The existing shop whilst generating custom is likely to generate fewer customers than the proposal as the current use is more of a specialised nature. Customer parking would continue to have to be accommodated in public parking facilities either in the nearby car parks or within on-street spaces. The proposed Class A3 use applied for also includes takeaway facilities and the Head of Transpiration Engineering is concerned that this type of use could result in parking demand along the frontage in contravention of existing restrictions, as the short term demand for this use often results in customers parking inappropriately. In similar situations elsewhere, consideration has been given to imposing a restriction on takeaway use requiring the sale of hot food for consumption on the premises only and whilst this is not always successful in discouraging inappropriate parking, the presence of kerbside parking and the public car park in the vicinity of the premises would likely be used.

On balance therefore, the Head of Transportation and Engineering recommends that if consent is granted, a condition is imposed removing the Takeaway element from the Class A3 use applied for.

In conclusion and having regard to all material considerations including the Human Rights Act, the introduction of the proposed use at this location is considered acceptable and subject to the imposition of conditions controlling hours of operation and restricting the use of the premises to a restaurant/cafe use only, the amenities of surrounding residential occupiers will not be significantly harmed and highway safety standards will not be compromised. The proposal is therefore considered to comply with the provisions of Policies EV1, EV2, EV9, EV40 and AS6 of the Unitary Development Plan. Approval is therefore recommended. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 11 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0003

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 The development shall be commenced not later than the expiration of 5 years from the date of this planning permission and shall be completed in accordance with the said application plans and conditions prior to any part thereof being brought into beneficial use, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1990 and to ensure that the development is completed in accordance with the plans approved by the City and County of Swansea, and so avoid any detriment to amenity or public safety by works remaining uncompleted.

2 The restaurant shall no be open to customers outside of the following hours: (i) Weekdays and Saturdays: 09.00 hours to 23.00 hours (ii) Sundays: 09.00 hours to 22.00 hours Reason: In the interest of residential amenity

3 The premises shall be used for restaurant/cafe purposes only and for no other purpose (including any other purpose in Class A3 of the Schedule to the Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) Order 1987, or in any provision equivalent to that Class in any statutory instrument revoking and re-enacting that Order with or without modification). Use as a hot food takeaway is expressly excluded. Reason: The development hereby approved is such that the Council wish to retain control over any future development being permitted in order to ensure that a satisfactory form of development is achieved at all times.

4 Prior to the use commencing, a method of ventilation and fume extraction shall be implemented in accordance with a scheme to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To prevent any nuisance from fumes and/or cooking odours to the occupiers of neighbouring premises.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: Policies EV1, EV2, EV9, EV40 and AS6 of the Swansea Unitary Development Plan.

2 The developer is advised of the potential flood risks, and is further advised to install flood-proofing measures as part of the development. For further information, please see ODPM publication "Preparing for Floods: Interim Guidance for Improving the Flood Resistance of Domestic and Small Business Properties" This may be viewed on the Planning Portal website: www.planningportal.gov.uk

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 11 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0003

3 Foul water and surface water discharges shall be drained separately from the site to protect the integrity of the public sewerage system. No net increase of surface water shall be allowed to connect (either directly or indirectly) to the public sewerage system, to prevent hydraulic overloading of the public sewerage system, to protect the health and safety of existing residents and ensure no detriment to the environment. Land drainage run-off shall not be permitted to discharge, either directly or indirectly, into the public sewerage system, to prevent hydraulic overload of the public sewerage system and pollution of the environment.

4 The proposed development site is crossed by a public sewer. Under the Water Industry Act 1991 Dwr Cymru Welsh Water has rights of access to its apparatus at all times. No part of the building will be permitted within 3 metres either side of the centreline of the public sewer, to protect the integrity of the public sewer and avoid damage thereto.

5 If a connection is required to the public sewerage system, the developer is advised to contact Dwr Cymru Welsh Water's Network Development Consultants on 01443 331155.

PLANS

Access statement, site location plan, existing front elevation photo, existing side elevation photo, existing floor plan, proposed floor plan, existing and proposed elevations (no changes proposed to elevations received 7th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 12 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0096 WARD: Bishopston Area 2

Location: 17A Wellfield Bishopston Swansea SA3 3EP Proposal: Increase in ridge height and rear roof extension with juliette balconies to provide living accommodation in roof space Applicant: Mr and Mrs R Westerholm

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV1 New development shall accord with a defined set of criteria of good design. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy HC7 Proposals for extensions and alterations to existing residential dwellings will be assess in terms of; relationship to the existing dwelling, impact on the character and appearance of the streetscene, effect on neighbouring properties, and impact on car parking. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2005/2588 First floor side extension, single storey rear extension, front canopy and retention of use of land as residential curtilage Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 13/04/2006

80/0079/03 ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO DWELLING Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 28/02/1980

76/1422/03 ERECTION OF A DWELLING Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 27/01/1977

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS The proposal was advertised via direct notification to neighbouring properties. No letters of objection have been forthcoming. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 12 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0096

Highways – No highway objection. Adequate parking is available within the site.

APPRAISAL

The application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Keith Marsh.

Full planning permission is sought to raise the ridge height and construction of a full width rear roof extension with Juliette balconies to a detached dwelling at No.17A Wellfield, Bishopston, Swansea. The dwelling lies within the AONB where local and national policies require that a high standard of design needs to be met, this is regardless of how visible or prominent a proposed form of development is.

The proposed dormer roof extension measures approximately 9.4 m wide; 2.2m high and would occupy the majority of the rear roof plane. The existing ridge would be raised by approximately 0.55m to facilitate this.

Issues The main issues for consideration with regard to this application relate to the impact of the proposal upon visual and residential amenities having regard to the prevailing Unitary Development Plan policies and the Supplementary Planning Guidance document entitled ‘A Design Guide for Householder Development’. There are in this case considered to be no additional issues arising from the provisions of the Human Rights Act, nor are there any highway safety issues to consider.

The adopted supplementary Planning Guidance entitled “A design Guide for Householder Development” states in paragraph 5.6 that “A dormer roof extension should not compromise the roof form or dominate the plane of the original roof. To achieve this, it should be set up from the eaves, down from the ridge and not occupy too much of the width of the roof.”

The proposal would be partially visible from a surrounding Public Rights Of Way. It is considered that the proposed extension would not relate well to the roofscape in terms of its siting, size and proportion and as such would represent a dominant and visually incongruous feature which would upset the design and proportions of the existing dwelling to the detriment of the overall character and appearance of the area contrary to Policies EV1, EV26 and HC7 of the Unitary Development Plan.

The increase in the ridge height, however, is considered acceptable given the minimal increase and as such it would not detract from the character and appearance of the area.

In terms of residential amenity, given the nature of the development proposed and relationship with adjoining properties it would not be considered to give rise to any overbearing or overshadowing impacts. In terms of overlooking, whilst there may be some increase in overlooking due to the elevated position of the extension, views from the windows would face largely towards the applicants garden, therefore any such impact is not likely to be so harmful as to warrant a recommendation for refusal in this instance. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 12 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0096

Conclusion In conclusion, therefore and having regard to all material considerations including the Human Rights Act, it is considered that the proposed dormer roof extension represents an unsatisfactory form of development, which would have an unacceptable impact upon the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the surrounding area contrary to Policies EV1, EV26 and HC7 of the Swansea Unitary Development Plan and the Council’s Design Guide for Householder Development. Refusal is therefore recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

REFUSE, for the following reason:

1 The proposed dormer roof extension by virtue of its size, design and siting would be out of keeping with and detract from the character and appearance of the existing dwelling and the wider AONB contrary to Policies EV1, EV26 and HC7 of the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan and the Council's Supplementary Planning Guidance document entitled 'A Design Guide for Householder Development'.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EV1, EV26 & HC7.

2 Bats may be present. All British bat species are protected under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and are listed in Schedule 2 of the Conservation (Natural Habitats & c.) Regulations 1994. This legislation implements the EC Habitats & Species Directive in the UK making it an offence to capture, kill or disturb a European Protected Species or to damage or destroy the breeding site or resting place of such an animal. It is also an offence to recklessly / intentionally to disturb such an animal. If evidence of bats is encountered during site clearance, work should cease immediately and the advice of the Countryside Council for Wales sought before continuing with any work (01792 634960).

3 Birds may be present in the roof of this building please note it is an offence under the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) to intentionally (intentionally or recklessly for Schedule 1 birds) to: - Kill, injure or take any wild bird - Take, damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird while that nest in use or being built - Take or destroy an egg of any wild bird Care should be taken when working on buildings particularly during the bird nesting season March-August.

PLANS

12/09/23/1- site location plan 1:1250, 12/09/23/1- site layout plan (block plan 1:500), 12/09/23/3- existing layout, 12/09/23/4- proposed layout received 20th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 13 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0015 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 3478 Crickton Farm Llanrhidian Swansea SA3 1ED Proposal: Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mrs A E Jeffreys

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2007/2594 Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 31/01/2008

99/1481 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

2001/1643 Use of land for a caravan rally for approximately 25 units from 26th to 28th July 2002 (inclusive) Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 16/11/2001

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 13 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0015

2001/1942 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2002/1064 Use of land for a caravan rally for approximately 20 units from 25th July - 27th July 2003 (inclusive) Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 19/07/2002

2003/2395 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2004

2004/0263 Use of land for a caravan rally for approximately 20 units from 10th September to the 12th September 2004 (inclusive) Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 25/06/2004

2005/2296 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

2006/2708 Creation of additional vehicular access Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 31/05/2007

2007/0844 General purpose agricultural building (application for prior approval of the Local Planning Authority) Decision: Prior Approval Is Not Required Decision Date: 04/05/2007

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1. In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 13 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0015

2. These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches(28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3. We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 3478, Crickton Farm, Llanrhidian.

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. The current application again proposes to site 5 caravans for a longer period than that which is normally applied for i.e. Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October. However, from the extension to the last two seasons, it is not considered that the addition of an extra month at either end of the usual season applied for unduly impacts upon the visual amenities of the area or the traffic network and adds another dimension to the usual tourism portfolio of the AONB. Moreover, no policy objections have been received to the extension of time and no complaints were received with regards to the extended seasons during 2008 and 2009. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

It should also be noted that as this application will come before the Local Planning Authority for renewal for the 2012/2013 seasons, the site can continue to be monitored to ensure no unacceptable impact is caused, and further approval of the extension dates can be reviewed at that time.

In conclusion therefore and having regard to all material considerations, It is considered that the application complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008, as no season dates are specifically indicated within the policy, and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions: AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 13 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0015

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22,EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan : Received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 14 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0017 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 6362, Great Lunnon Farm Lunnon Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mr V M Jones

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2007/2630 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2008

99/1476 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 14 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0017

2001/1932 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2382 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2004

2005/2302 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

Ilston Community Council – No objection

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1. In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2. These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches(28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3. We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 6362, Great Lunnon Farm. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 14 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0017

The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. There are no policy objections and the site will not as a result of its temporary nature detract significantly from the visual amenities of the AONB. The application therefore complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22,EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 15 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0018 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 0785 Stavel Dene, Llanrhidian Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Miss E M Shepherd

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 81/1440/03 CONTINUATION OF USE AS A CARAVAN SITE (I/E. NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS) Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 26/11/1981

83/1473/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION TO USE FIELD AS A CARAVAN SITE FOR 5 TOURING CARAVANS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/12/1983

85/0068/03 PERMISSION TO SITE NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 28/02/1985

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 15 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0018

85/1739/04 CONTINUATION OF USE AS A CARAVAN SITE FOR FIVE TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO THE CARAVAN CLUB. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 19/12/1985

86/1771/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR FIVE TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB DURING THE 1987 + 1988 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/01/1987

88/1996/04 CONTINUATION FOR A PERIOD OF 2 YEARS FROM 1.1.89 FOR CONSENT 2/1/86/1771 DATED 29.1.87 FOR NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 31/01/1989

2007/2628 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 01/02/2008

99/1498 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

2001/1944 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2002/0017 Use of land for a caravan rally for approximately 30 units from 12-14th July 2002 (inclusive) Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/02/2002

2003/2393 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2004

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 15 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0018

2004/0759 Use of land for caravan rally for approx. 40 units from 28th May - 1st June 2004 (inclusive) Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 06/05/2004

90/1631/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF FIVE TOURING CARAVANS DURING THE 1991 AND 1992 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 15/01/1991

92/1423 REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY CONSENT FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS DURING THE 1993 AND 1994 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/01/1993

95/0052 REMOVAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) DURING THE 1995 & 1996 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 24/02/1995

97/1711 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1998 AND 1999 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 16/01/1998

2005/2295 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1. In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2. These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches(28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3. We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 15 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0018

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 0785, Stavel Dene, Llanrhidian. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. There are no policy objections and the site will not as a result of its temporary nature detract significantly from the visual amenities of the AONB. The application therefore complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22,EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 15 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0018

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 16 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0020 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 7429 Little Reynoldston Farm Reynoldston Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 30th September during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mrs S Arnold

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2007/2629 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2008

99/1491 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 16 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0020

2001/1936 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2379 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2004

2005/2308 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

82/1181/03 CONTINUATION OF USE AS A CARAVAN SITE Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 25/11/1982

81/1443/03 CONTINUATION OF USE AS A CARAVAN SITE (I.E. NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS) Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 26/11/1981

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches (28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 30th September during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 7429, Little Reynoldston Farm, Reynoldston. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. There are no policy objections and the site will not as a result of its temporary nature detract significantly from the visual amenities of the AONB. The application therefore complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 30th September during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22,EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Access statement, site location plan received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 17 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0021 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 2000, Stembridge Farm, Llanrhidian, Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: G E Gordon

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 83/1427/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION TO USE FIELD FOR FOR SITING OF 3 CARAVANS FOR 28 DAYS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/12/1983

84/0105/03 PERMISSION TO USE AS SITE FOR UP TO FIVE TOURING CARAVANS FOR TWENTY EIGHT DAYS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/03/1984

85/1758/04 CONTINUATION OF USE AS A CARAVAN SITE FOR NOT MORE THAN FIVE TOURING CARAVANS BELONG- ING TO MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 27/02/1986 AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 17 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0021

86/1767/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR FIVE TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB DURING THE 1987 + 1988 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/01/1987

88/1983/04 CONTINUATION FOR A PERIOD OF 2 YEARS FROM 1.1.89 FOR CONSENT 2/1/86/1767 DATED 29.1.87 FOR NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 31/01/1989

90/1635/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF FIVE TOURING CARAVANS DURING THE 1991 AND 1992 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 15/01/1991

92/1420 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY CONSENT FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS DURING THE 1993 AND 1994 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/01/1993

95/0065 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER) TO THE 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1995 AND 1996 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 24/02/1995

97/1712 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1998 AND 1999 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 16/01/1998

2007/2603 Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 31/01/2008

99/1487 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 17 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0021

2001/1943 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2377 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 09/01/2004

2005/2292 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches(28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 2000, Stembridge Farm, Llanrhidian. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 17 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0021

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. The current application again proposes to site 5 caravans for a longer period than that which is normally applied for i.e. Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October. However, from the extension to the last two seasons, it is not considered that the addition of an extra month at either end of the usual season applied for unduly impacts upon the visual amenities of the area or the traffic network and adds another dimension to the usual tourism portfolio of the AONB. Moreover, no policy objections have been received to the extension of time and no complaints were received with regards to the extended seasons during 2008 and 2009. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

It should also be noted that as this application will come before the Local Planning Authority for renewal for the 2012/2013 seasons, the site can continue to be monitored to ensure no unacceptable impact is caused, and further approval of the extension dates can be reviewed at that time.

In conclusion therefore and having regard to all material considerations, It is considered that the application complies with the requirements of Policies EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008, as no season dates are specifically indicated within the policy, and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 17 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0021

PLANS Site location plan and access statement received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 18 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0022 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 7267, Perriswood Farm, Nicholaston, Swansea SA3 2HN Proposal: Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mr B Williams

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2007/2601 Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 31/01/2008

2001/1939 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2388 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 09/01/2004 AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 18 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0022

2005/2303 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

81/0839/03 3 CARAVANS AND 6 TENTS FOR A PERIOD OF MAY TO SEPTEMBER Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 30/07/1981

80/0471/03 SITING OF 3 CARAVANS AND 4 OR 5 TENTS FOR PERIOD BETWEEN MAY AND END OF AUGUST Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 08/05/1980

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

Ilston Community Council – No objection

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches(28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 7267, Perriswood Farm, Nicholaston. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 18 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0022

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. The current application again proposes to site 5 caravans for a longer period than that which is normally applied for i.e. Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October. However, from the extension to the last two seasons, it is not considered that the addition of an extra month at either end of the usual season applied for unduly impacts upon the visual amenities of the area or the traffic network and adds another dimension to the usual tourism portfolio of the AONB. Moreover, no policy objections have been received to the extension of time and no complaints were received with regards to the extended seasons during 2008 and 2009. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

It should also be noted that as this application will come before the Local Planning Authority for renewal for the 2012/2013 seasons, the site can continue to be monitored to ensure no unacceptable impact is caused, and further approval of the extension dates can be reviewed at that time.

In conclusion therefore and having regard to all material considerations, It is considered that the application complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008, as no season dates are specifically indicated within the policy, and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 18 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0022

PLANS

Site location plan & access statement received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 19 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0023 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 0031, Ivy Cottage Farm, Nicholaston, Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting for a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is earliest) to 31st October in 2010/2011 season Applicant: Mr P R Williams

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2007/2607 Use of land for the siting for a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is earliest) to 31st October in 2008/2009 season Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2008

98/1021 FIRST FLOOR REAR CONSERVATORY EXTENSION Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 21/08/1998

99/1477 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999 AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 19 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0023

2001/1934 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 29/01/2002

2003/2384 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 20/01/2004

2005/2304 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/02/2006

2007/2093 Use of land for the siting of 20 touring caravans Decision: Refuse Decision Date: 31/10/2007

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

Ilston Community Council – No objection

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches(28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 19 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0023

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Field 0031, Ivy Cottage farm Nicholaston is situated on the southern side of the main south Gower Road, close to the main junction in Nicholaston which serves the cluster of housing at Nicholaston. The field has been in use for a number of years as a small seasonal site for a maximum of 5 touring caravans during the period Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October annually. Permission is now sought to renew this temporary consent for the 2010 and 2011 seasons.

Previous permissions (2003/2384, 2005/2304 and 2007/2607) had a condition imposed to prevent caravans from being sited within 15 metres of the eastern boundary of the field where it adjoins the adjacent residential properties, in order to protect their amenity, following complaints about noise and disturbance. It is therefore recommended that this condition be re-imposed for this application. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

In conclusion therefore and having regard to all other material considerations, including the Human Rights Act, it is considered that the proposed renewal of planning permission for the 2010 and 2011 seasons represents a satisfactory use of the land which accords with Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 and approval is therefore recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 Prior to the siting of any caravans on site, a 15m exclusion zone shall be marked out along the eastern boundary of the site by a 1m high post and wire fence in accordance with a scheme to be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Once approved, the fence shall remain throughout the 2010/2011 seasons unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: In the interests of the residential amenities of the occupiers of nearby residential properties.

2 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

3 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 19 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0023

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan, Access Statement : Received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 20 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0024 WARD: Fairwood Area 2

Location: Field 7924, Blackhills Lane, Fairwood, Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mrs C S Slack

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2007/2631 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 15/01/2008

99/1497 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 20 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0024

2001/1931 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2381 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 09/01/2004

2005/2299 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

76/1536/03 TOURING CARAVANS AND CAMPING Decision: *HRP - REFUSE PERMISSION Decision Date: 07/04/1977

83/1469/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION TO USE FIELD AS A CARAVAN SITE FOR 5 TOURING CARAVANS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/12/1983

83/1561/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION TO USE FIELD FOR THE SITING OF 6 TENTS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/12/1983

85/0410/03 CAMPING SITE. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 25/04/1985

86/0186/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR 6 TENTS FOR UP TO 28DAYS DURING THE 1986 SEASON. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 24/04/1986

86/1749/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR FIVE TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB DURING THE 1987 + 1988 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/01/1987 AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 20 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0024

88/0659/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF SIX TENTS FOR UP TO 28 DAYS DURING THE 1988 SEASON. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 07/06/1988

88/1968/04 CONTINUATION FOR A PERIOD OF 2 YEARS FROM 1.1.89 FOR CONSENT 2/1/86/1749 DATED 29.1.87 FOR NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 04/04/1989

90/1628/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF FIVE TOURING CARAVANS DURING THE 1991 AND 1992 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 28/12/1990

92/1425 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF FIVE TOURING CARAVANS DURING THE 1993 & 1994 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/01/1993

95/0041 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF FIVE TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1995 & 1996 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 03/03/1995

97/1698 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1998 AND 1999 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 16/01/1998

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches (28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 20 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0024

3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 7924, Blackhills Lane, Fairwood. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is matter for the applicants themselves.

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. There are no policy objections and the site will not as a result of its temporary nature detract significantly from the visual amenities of the AONB. The application therefore complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 20 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0024

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 21 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0025 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 0050, Eastmoor Farm, Rhossili, Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mrs K Beynon

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2007/2605 Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 31/01/2008

99/1488 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

2001/1948 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002 AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 21 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0025

2003/2380 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 09/01/2004

2005/2309 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches(28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 0050, Eastmoor Farm, Rhossili.

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. The current application again proposes to site 5 caravans for a longer period than that which is normally applied for i.e. Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October. However, from the extension to the last two seasons, it is not considered that the addition of an extra month at either end of the usual season applied for unduly impacts upon the visual amenities of the area or the traffic network and adds another dimension to the usual tourism portfolio of the AONB. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 21 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0025

Moreover, no policy objections have been received to the extension of time and no complaints were received with regards to the extended seasons during 2008 and 2009. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

It should also be noted that as this application will come before the Local Planning Authority for renewal for the 2012/2013 seasons, the site can continue to be monitored to ensure no unacceptable impact is caused, and further approval of the extension dates can be reviewed at that time.

In conclusion therefore and having regard to all material considerations, It is considered that the application complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008, as no season dates are specifically indicated within the policy, and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM APPLICATION NO. 2010/0026 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 2872 Mewslade View, Middleton Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mrs B Howe

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2007/2620 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2008

99/1489 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 21 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0025

2001/1946 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2390 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 09/01/2004

2005/2305 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches (28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 2872,Mewslade View, Middleton. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 21 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0025

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. There are no policy objections and the site will not as a result of its temporary nature detract significantly from the visual amenities of the AONB. The application therefore complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan and access statement received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 22 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0026 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 2872 Mewslade View, Middleton Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mrs B Howe

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2007/2620 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2008

99/1489 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 22 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0026

2001/1946 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2390 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 09/01/2004

2005/2305 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches (28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 2872,Mewslade View, Middleton. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 22 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0026

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. There are no policy objections and the site will not as a result of its temporary nature detract significantly from the visual amenities of the AONB. The application therefore complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan and access statement received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 23 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0027 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Fields 2463 and 2854, Heatherbrae, Nicholaston, Swansea SA3 2HL Proposal: Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mrs J M Lloyd

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 81/1438/03 CONTINUATION OF THE USE AS A CARAVAN SITE (I. E. NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS) Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 26/11/1981

82/1176/03 CONTINUATION OF USE AS A CARAVAN SITE Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 25/11/1982

83/1474/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION TO USE FIELDS AS A CARAVAN SITE FOR 5 TOURING CARAVANS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/12/1983

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 23 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0027

85/0079/03 PERMISSION TO SITE NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 28/02/1985

85/1735/04 CONTINUATION OF USE AS A CARAVAN SITE FOR FIVE TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO THE CARAVAN CLUB. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 19/12/1985

86/1758/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR FIVE TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB DURING THE 1987 + 1988 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/01/1987

2007/2602 Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 31/01/2008

88/1992/04 CONTINUATION FOR A PERIOD OF 2 YEARS FROM 1.1.89 FOR CONSENT 2/1/86/1758 DATED 29.1.87 FOR NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 31/01/1989

90/1644/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF FIVE TOURING CARAVANS DURING THE 1991 AND 1992 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 15/01/1991

92/1409 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF FIVE TOURING CARAVANS DURING THE 1993 & 1994 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/01/1993

95/0061 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1995 AND 1996 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 03/03/1995

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 23 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0027

97/1713 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1998 AND 1999 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 16/01/1998

99/1479 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICH EVER IS THE EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

2001/1937 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2386 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 09/01/2004

2005/2301 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

Ilston Community Council – No objection

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches(28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 23 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0027

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010/2011 seasons at Fields 2463 & 2854, Heatherbrae, Nicholaston.

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. The current application again proposes to site 5 caravans for a longer period than that which is normally applied for i.e. Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October. However, from the extension to the last two seasons, it is not considered that the addition of an extra month at either end of the usual season applied for unduly impacts upon the visual amenities of the area or the traffic network and adds another dimension to the usual tourism portfolio of the AONB. Moreover, no policy objections have been received to the extension of time and no complaints were received with regards to the extended seasons during 2008 and 2009. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

It should also be noted that as this application will come before the Local Planning Authority for renewal for the 2012/2013 seasons, the site can continue to be monitored to ensure no unacceptable impact is caused, and further approval of the extension dates can be reviewed at that time.

In conclusion therefore and having regard to all material considerations, It is considered that the application complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008, as no season dates are specifically indicated within the policy, and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditionS:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 23 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0027

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan & access statement received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 24 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0029 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 0028, Little Hills Farm, Port Eynon, Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mr P C A Griffin

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2007/2587 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2008

99/1486 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 24 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0029

2001/1933 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2383 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2004

2005/2300 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

80/0436/03 SITING OF 3 CARAVANS FOR 28 DAYS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 08/05/1980

81/0011/03 CARAVAN SITE TO BE USED BY CARAVAN CLUB Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 26/02/1981

81/1473/03 PROPOSED RALLY MAY 28TH - JUNE 1ST 1982 Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 26/11/1981

80/0468/03 WEEKEND CARAVAN RALLY JUNE 20TH - 22ND 1980 Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 08/05/1980

81/1450/03 CONTINUATION OF USE AS A CARAVAN SITE (I.E. NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS) Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 26/11/1981

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 24 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0029

2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches (28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 0028, Little Hills Farm, Port Eynon. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. There are no policy objections and the site will not as a result of its temporary nature detract significantly from the visual amenities of the AONB. The application therefore complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 24 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0029

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Access statement, site location plan received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 25 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0030 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 7608, Sunnyside Farm, Llandewi, Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or the 1st April (which ever is the earlier) to 31st October 2010/2011 season Applicant: Mrs J James

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2007/2609 Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or the 1st April (which ever is the earlier) to 31st October 2008/2009 season Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2008

99/1490 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 25 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0030

2001/1938 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2387 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 09/01/2004

2005/2297 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

81/1165/03 SITING OF NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/10/1981

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches(28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 25 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0030

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 7608, Sunnyside Farm, Llandewi. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. There are no policy objections and the site will not as a result of its temporary nature detract significantly from the visual amenities of the AONB. The application therefore complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan, Access Statement : Received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 26 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0031 WARD: Fairwood Gower Area 2

Location: Field 8270, Fairwood Corner Farm, Fairwood, Swansea SA2 7LB Proposal: Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mrs H Griffiths

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 81/1436/03 CONTINUATION OF THE USE AS A CARAVAN SITE (IE NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS) Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 26/11/1981

82/1174/03 CONTINUATION OF USE AS CARAVAN SITE Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 25/11/1982

83/1468/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION TO USE FIELD AS A CARAVAN SITE FOR 5 TOURING CARAVANS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/12/1983

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 26 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0031

85/0087/03 PERMISSION TO SITE NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 28/02/1985

85/1743/04 CONTINUATION OF USE AS A CARAVAN SITE FOR FIVE TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO THE CARAVAN CLUB. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 19/12/1985

86/1770/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR FIVE TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB DURING THE 1987 + 1988 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/01/1987

90/1632/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF FIVE TOURING CARAVANS FOR THE 1991 AND 1992 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 28/12/1990

92/1421 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY CONSENT FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS DURING THE 1993 AND 1994 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/01/1993

95/0064 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1995 AND 1996 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 24/02/1995

97/1695 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OF 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1998 AND 1999 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 16/01/1998

2007/2599 Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 31/01/2008

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 26 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0031

99/1496 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

2001/1949 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2392 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2004

2005/2310 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

Ilston Community Council – No objection

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1. In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2. These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches(28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3. We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 26 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0031

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 8270, Fairwood Corner Farm, Fairwood.

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. The current application again proposes to site 5 caravans for a longer period than that which is normally applied for i.e. Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October. However, from the extension to the last two seasons, it is not considered that the addition of an extra month at either end of the usual season applied for unduly impacts upon the visual amenities of the area or the traffic network and adds another dimension to the usual tourism portfolio of the AONB. Moreover, no policy objections have been received to the extension of time and no complaints were received with regards to the extended seasons during 2008 and 2009. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

It should also be noted that as this application will come before the Local Planning Authority for renewal for the 2012/2013 seasons, the site can continue to be monitored to ensure no unacceptable impact is caused, and further approval of the extension dates can be reviewed at that time.

In conclusion therefore and having regard to all material considerations, It is considered that the application complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008, as no season dates are specifically indicated within the policy, and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following condition:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 26 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0031

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan received 6th January 2010

ITEM 27 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0032 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 3890, Barraston Hall Farm, Llangennith, Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mr J Taylor

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 27 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0032

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 82/0349/03 SITING OF FIVE CARAVANS FOR TWENTY EIGHT DAYS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 11/05/1982

83/1467/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION TO USE FIELD AS A CARAVAN SITE FOR 5 TOURING CARAVANS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/12/1983

85/0073/03 PERMISSION TO SITE NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO THE MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 28/02/1985

85/1756/04 CONTINUATION OF USE AS A CARAVAN SITE FOR NOT MORE THAN FIVE TOURING CARAVANS BELONG- ING TO MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 27/02/1986

86/1765/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR FIVE TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB DURING THE 1987 + 1988 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/01/1987

88/1985/04 CONTINUATION FOR A PERIOD OF 2 YEARS FROM 1.1.89 FOR CONSENT 2/1/86/1765 DATED 29.1.87 FOR NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 31/01/1989

90/1641/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF FIVE TOURING CARAVANS DURING THE 1991 AND 1992 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 15/01/1991

92/1417 RENEWAL OF TEMP CONSENT FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS DURING THE 1993 AND 1994 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/01/1993

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 27 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0032

95/0059 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO THE 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1995 AND 1996 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 03/03/1995

97/1707 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1998 AND 1999 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 16/01/1998

82/0112/04 RENEWAL OF PERMISSION TO SITE THREE CARAVANS FROM 09.07.82 TO 31.08.82 Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 25/03/1982

2007/2608 Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2008

99/1495 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 04/01/2000

2001/1947 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2391 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2004

2005/2307 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005 AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 27 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0032

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

Llangennith, Llanmadoc and Cheriton Community Council – No objection but are concerned that a caravan has been left in the adjacent field that does not appear to be for the use of the residents of Barraston hall and perhaps enforcement action should be considered.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches(28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 3890, Barraston Hall Farm, Llangennith. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

With regards to the comments made by the Community Council, their letter has been forwarded to the Enforcement Section for investigation.

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. There are no policy objections and the site will not as a result of its temporary nature detract significantly from the visual amenities of the AONB. The application therefore complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions: AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 27 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0032

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan and access statement received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 28 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0033 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field No. 2746 Orchard Park Farm Llanmadoc Swansea SA3 1DE Proposal: Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mr A Hoskin

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 80/0504/03 SITING OF 3 TOURING CARAVANS FOR 28 DAYS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 08/05/1980

83/1593/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION TO USE FIELD FOR SITING OF 3 CARAVANS FOR 28 DAYS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/12/1983

85/0179/04 SITE 5 TOURING CARAVANS FOR 28 DAYS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 28/03/1985

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 28 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0033

86/0169/03 USE AS A CARAVAN SITE FOR NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 24/04/1986

86/1746/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR 5 TOURING CARAVANS BELONGING TO MEMBERS OF THE CARAVAN CLUB DURING THE 1987 + 1988 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 29/01/1987

88/1995/04 CONTINUATION FOR A PERIOD OF 2 YEARS FROM 1.1.89 FOR CONSENT 2/1/86/1746 DATED 29.1.87 FOR NOT MORE THAN 5 TOURING CARAVANS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 31/01/1989

90/1630/04 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF FIVE TOURING CARAVANS DURING THE 1991 AND 1992 SEASONS. Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 28/12/1990

92/1426 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PLANNING PERMISSION FOR A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS FROM 1ST JANUARY 1993 FOR THE SITING OF FIVE TOURING CARAVANS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 26/01/1993

95/0051 RENEWAL OF TEMPORARY PERMISSION FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1995 & 1996 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 24/02/1995

97/1710 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 1998 AND 1999 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 16/01/1998

82/0397/03 TEMPORARY SITE FOR THREE CARAVANS FOR TWENTY EIGHT DAYS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 25/06/1982

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 28 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0033

2007/2604 Use of land for the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st of March to 30th November during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 31/01/2008

99/1485 USE OF LANDFOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

2001/1941 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2396 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2004

2005/2298 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches(28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 28 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0033

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 2746, Orchard Park, Llanmadoc.

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. The current application again proposes to site 5 caravans for a longer period than that which is normally applied for i.e. Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October. However, from the extension to the last two seasons, it is not considered that the addition of an extra month at either end of the usual season applied for unduly impacts upon the visual amenities of the area or the traffic network and adds another dimension to the usual tourism portfolio of the AONB. Moreover, no policy objections have been received to the extension of time and no complaints were received with regards to the extended seasons during 2008 and 2009. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves.

It should also be noted that as this application will come before the Local Planning Authority for renewal for the 2012/2013 seasons, the site can continue to be monitored to ensure no unacceptable impact is caused, and further approval of the extension dates can be reviewed at that time.

In conclusion therefore and having regard to all material considerations, It is considered that the application complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008, as no season dates are specifically indicated within the policy, and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following condition:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from 1st March to 30th November during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 28 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0033

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Management and Protection of the City and County of Swansea.

3 This consent is issued without prejudice to any other consents or easements that may be required in connection with the proposed development.

PLANS

Site location plan and access statement received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 29 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0034 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: Field 2311 Lake Farm House Llandewi Swansea Proposal: Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2010/2011 seasons Applicant: Mr and Mrs A Bryant

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV22 The countryside throughout the County will be conserved and enhanced for the sake of its natural heritage, natural resources, historic and cultural environment and agricultural and recreational value through: i) The control of development, and ii) Practical management and improvement measures. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EC22 Control of camping and touring caravans on farms and storage of touring caravans. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

App No. Proposal 2007/2623 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2008/2009 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2008

99/1478 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 29 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0034

2001/1935 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2385 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2004

2005/2306 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

2006/2472 Single storey rear extension to provide self contained unit Decision: Refuse Decision Date: 04/01/2007

2007/0300 Single storey rear extension Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 14/03/2007

99/1478 USE OF LAND FOR THE SITING OF 5 TOURING CARAVANS FROM GOOD FRIDAY OR 1ST APRIL (WHICHEVER IS THE EARLIER) TO 31ST OCTOBER DURING THE 2000 AND 2001 SEASONS Decision: *HGPC - GRANT PERMISSION CONDITIONAL Decision Date: 22/12/1999

2001/1935 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2002/2003 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 07/01/2002

2003/2385 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2004/2005 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 08/01/2004

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 29 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0034

2005/2306 Use of land for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to 31st October during 2006/2007 seasons Decision: Grant Temporary Permission Decision Date: 02/12/2005

2006/2472 Single storey rear extension to provide self contained unit Decision: Refuse Decision Date: 04/01/2007

2007/0300 Single storey rear extension Decision: Grant Permission Conditional Decision Date: 14/03/2007

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site by site notice. No response.

The Gower Society – Comments as follows:

1 In the main the CL sites (caravan Club certified locations) on Gower are well managed and the site owners adhere to the club rules. 2 These rules are very stringent in that they prevent long term stays on pitches (28 day maximum) as well as having very strict ruling on numbers as well as additional cars and tents.. 3 We are aware however, of certain sites that do not adhere to the Club rules; in particular, the allowing of seasonal pitches – in some cases outside Easter to 31st October as well as winter storing.

We think that it would be appropriate for you to stress these points to the applicants and ask them to inform their site owners that such non-compliance could result in the loss of their licences. We know only too well that once patterns are established it becomes difficult to change them.

Highway Observations – No highway objection to renewal of temporary consent.

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Temporary planning permission is sought for the siting of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010/2011 seasons at Field 2311, Lake Farm House, Llandewi. The concerns of the Gower Society are noted but the behaviour of the site owners and subsequent potential loss of the site licence from the Caravan Club is a matter for the applicants themselves. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 29 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0034

This site is well established and has been used at various times throughout recent years. There are no policy objections and the site will not as a result of its temporary nature detract significantly from the visual amenities of the AONB. The application therefore complies with the requirements of Policy EC22 of the Unitary Development Plan 2008 and approval is recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 This permission relates to the siting of a maximum of 5 touring caravans from Good Friday or 1st April (whichever is the earlier) to the 31st October during the 2010 and 2011 seasons. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

2 The land owners shall maintain a daily record of caravans sited on this land, such records to be open for inspection by the Local Planning Authority at any time and maintained as a permanent record for such purpose. Reason: To enable the Local Planning Authority to review the situation at the end of that period.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EC22, EV22, EV26

2 The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Head of Environmental Health Services of the City and County of Swansea.

3 The site shall be kept in a neat and tidy condition at all times and compliance with this requirement will be taken into account in the consideration of any subsequent application for the renewal of this consent.

PLANS

Access statement, site location plan received 6th January 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 30 APPLICATION NO. 2010/0080 WARD: Gower Area 2

Location: The Croft, 3 Priors Town Llangennith, Swansea SA3 1HU Proposal: Single storey rear extension with first floor living accommodation in the roof space incorporating recessed balcony Applicant: Mrs Tracey Williams

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

POLICIES

Policy Policy Description Policy EV1 New development shall accord with a defined set of criteria of good design. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008).

Policy EV9 Development within or adjacent to a Conservation Area will only be permitted if it would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Conservation Area or its setting. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy EV26 Within the Gower AONB, the primary objective is the conservation and enhancement of the area's natural beauty. Development that would have a material adverse effect on the natural beauty, wildlife and cultural heritage of the AONB will not be permitted. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

Policy HC7 Proposals for extensions and alterations to existing residential dwellings will be assess in terms of; relationship to the existing dwelling, impact on the character and appearance of the streetscene, effect on neighbouring properties, and impact on car parking. (City & County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008)

SITE HISTORY

None

RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS

The application was advertised on site and in the press as development within a Conservation Area and neighbouring properties were consulted; no correspondence has been received in respect of the proposal.

Highway Observations – Adequate parking is available within the site. No highway objection.

Llangennith, Llanmadoc and Cheriton Community Council – No objection but concern over the front facing dormer. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 30 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0080

APPRAISAL

This application is reported to Committee for decision at the request of Councillor Richard Lewis.

Full planning permission is sought for the construction of a single storey rear extension with first floor living accommodation and recessed balcony at The Croft, 3 Priors Town, Llangennith. The property is a detached bungalow and occupies a modest plot within an established rural residential area within the village and Llangenith Conservation Area.

The proposed balcony and rear extension would provide a bedroom and lounge room. The proposed rear extension measures 6.8m in width, 4.7m in depth, 2.7m to the eaves and 5.4m to the ridge. The recessed portion of the balcony will be clad in cedar wood, with the vertical elements finished in painted render.

The main issues for consideration with regard to this application relate to the impact of the proposal upon visual and residential amenities and whether the proposal preserves or enhances the character and appearance of the Conservation Area and Gower AONB, when considered against Policies HC7, EV1, EV9 and EV26 of the City and County of Swansea and the Supplementary Planning Guidance document entitled A Design Guide for Householder Development. There are in this case considered to be no additional issues arising from the provisions of the Human Rights Act, nor are there any highway safety issues to consider. The proposal originally included a rear dormer but this has now been removed from the scheme following negotiation.

In response to the consultation received from the Community Council, the dormer was located on the rear elevation and not the front as indicated in the response.

In respect of issues of visual amenity, the proposed scheme incorporates a design including a pitched roof which is considered, to comply with the design principles outlined in the Supplementary Planning Guidance document entitled, “A Design Guide for Householder Development”. The proposed rear extension, given the use of cedar cladding and matching materials to limit its visual prominence from surrounding vantage points and the incorporation of suggested design changes results in a proposal that is considered to preserve the character and appearance of the Llangennith Conservation Area in accordance with Policies EV1, EV9, EV26 and HC7 of the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan 2008.

Turning to residential amenity it is considered that the proposal would not result in a loss of privacy to the adjacent property as there are no side windows at first floor and the views from the recessed balcony would be predominantly over the applicants own private garden area and would not provide a wider field of view to the detriment of the privacy of adjacent occupiers. The extension due to its siting and design is not considered to have an overbearing or overshadowing impact on the occupiers of the adjacent property. The proposal complies with the 45 degree code due to the distance between the adjacent property and the existence of a garage within the curtilage of the adjacent property. The proposal in this instance is considered to comply with Policies EV1 and HC7 of the Unitary Development Plan and the Householder Development Design Guide. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 30 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0080

In conclusion, having regard to all material considerations including the Human Rights Act, the proposal is considered to represent a satisfactory form of development that preserves the character and appearance of the Llangennith Conservation Area and wider Gower AONB and the amenities of adjoining occupiers in accordance with current development plan Policies HC7, EV1, EV9 and EV26 of the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan and the Supplementary Planning Guidance document entitled A Design Guide for Householder Development. Approval is therefore recommended.

RECOMMENDATION

APPROVE, subject to the following conditions:

1 The development shall be commenced not later than the expiration of 5 years from the date of this planning permission and shall be completed in accordance with the said application plans and conditions prior to any part thereof being brought into beneficial use, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Reason: To comply with the provisions of Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1990 and to ensure that the development is completed in accordance with the plans approved by the City and County of Swansea, and so avoid any detriment to amenity or public safety by works remaining uncompleted.

2 The materials used in the development hereby approved shall match those of the existing building. Reason: In the interests of visual amenity.

INFORMATIVES

1 The development plan covering the City and County of Swansea is the City and County of Swansea Unitary Development Plan. The following policies were relevant to the consideration of the application: EV1, EV26 & HC7.

2 Birds may be present in the roof of this building please note it is an offence under the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) to intentionally (intentionally or recklessly for Schedule 1 birds) to: - Kill, injure or take any wild bird - Take, damage or destroy the nest of any wild bird while that nest in use or being built - Take or destroy an egg of any wild bird Care should be taken when working on buildings particularly during the bird nesting season March-August.

3 Bats may be present. All British bat species are protected under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife & Countryside Act 1981 (as amended) and are listed in Schedule 2 of the Conservation (Natural Habitats & c.) Regulations 1994. This legislation implements the EC Habitats & Species Directive in the UK making it an offence to capture, kill or disturb a European Protected Species or to damage or destroy the breeding site or resting place of such an animal. It is also an offence to recklessly / intentionally to disturb such an animal. AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE – 23RD FEBRUARY 2010

ITEM 30 (CONT’D) APPLICATION NO. 2010/0080

If evidence of bats is encountered during site clearance, work should cease immediately and the advice of the Countryside Council for Wales sought before continuing with any work (01792 634960).

PLANS

L(90)01 existing site plan and block plans, L(90)02 proposed site and block plans, L(99)01 existing ground floor plan, L(99)02 existing elevations, L received 19th January 2010 (99)03Cproposed ground and first floor plans, L(99)04 C proposed elevations received 16th February 2010

AREA 2 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE (37)

Councillors:

Swansea Administration Councillors: V A Bates-Hughes P M Meara A M Day W K Morgan E W Fitzgerald J Newbury N A Holley (Non Voting) C L Philpott J W Jones D Price Mary H Jones T H Rees S M Jones R J Stanton J B Kelleher N J Tregoning R D Lewis (Chair) D P Tucker (Vice Chair) K E Marsh S M Waller Thomas

Labour Councillors: M C Child E T Kirchner W Evans P M Matthews R Francis-Davies J T Miles D H James J C Richards W (Billy) E A Jones D W W Thomas D I E Jones P B Smith

Conservative Councillors: A (Tony) C S Colburn R H Kinzett (Non Voting) P R Hood-Williams (Non Voting) M Smith

Communities of Swansea Councillors: M E Gibbs R L Smith G Seabourne