Assembly Meeting Minutes: 17 October 2016
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
North Atlantic Energy Network January 2016
North Atlantic Energy Network January 2016 Orkustofnun (OS) - National Energy Authority of Iceland Norges Arktiske Universitet (UiT) - The Arctic University of Norway Energy Styrelsen - Danish Energy Agency Jarðfeingi - Faroese Earth and Energy Directorate Shetland Islands Council - Economic Development Service Greenland Innovation Centre 1 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The aim of the North Atlantic Energy Network project was to investigate how isolated energy systems in the North Atlantic can be connected to Norway and Greenland to form an electrical grid in the North Atlantic. Representatives of Greenland, Iceland, Faroe Islands, Shetland and Norway met in Copenhagen in the end of February 2015 to formulate how to tackle this question. Each country documented its status regarding energy production and potentials in the fields of renewable energy and the technological aspects were investigated. Greenland has a big hydropower and solar energy potential, which is not known in detail. Further work is needed to map the potentials. Due to lack of infrastructure and experience a cable connection between Greenland and the neighbouring countries is not realistic in the nearest future. It is technically possible to connect all of the neighbouring countries around Iceland with subsea cables. Iceland now produces about 18 TWh of electricity per year and could have the potential to double the production from geothermal and hydropower alone. There are many unclear aspects that need to be investigated further to draw a full picture of the pros and cons of interconnectors from Iceland. The legal and regulatory framework must be in place before a project of this kind can be realized and extensive grid reinforcements are needed to support export through a cable at a single connection point in Iceland. -
Nordic Grid Development Plan 2012 Foreword
Nordic Grid Development Plan 2012 Foreword The Nordic transmission system operators (TSOs) have a long history of successful cooperation within grid development. Three common Nordic grid master plans have been developed in the last ten years in the context of Nordel, the previous cooperative organization for the Nordic TSOs. Joint Nordic grid development is essential to support further development of an integrated Nordic electricity market, as well as increased capacity to other countries and integration of renewable energy sources (RES). The Nordic co-operation on grid development is now taking place within the wider regional context provided by the regional groups North Sea and Baltic Sea of ENTSO-E, the European organization for TSOs, in addition to bilateral co-operation when required. The Nordic Grid Development Plan 2012 is prepared as a response to the request from the Nordic Council of Ministers of October 25, 2010. The plan is prepared by Statnett, Svenska Kraftnät, Energinet.dk and Fingrid, and the Icelandic TSO Landsnet has provided input regarding the Icelandic grid. The plan presents the Nordic grid investment plans for the next ten years. 28. September 2012 Oslo Stockholm Copenhagen Helsinki Statnett SF Svenska Kraftnät Energinet.dk Fingrid Auke Lont Mikael Odenberg Peder Østermark Andreasen Jukka Ruusunen CEO CEO CEO CEO LIST OF TABLES....................................................................................................................... 2 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................ -
'A+' Rating Affirmed with a Stable Outlook Statnett SF
Research Update: Statnett SF 'A+' Rating Affirmed With A Stable Outlook February 26, 2020 Rating Action Overview PRIMARY CREDIT ANALYST - The Norwegian Energy Regulatory Authority (NVE) has announced that Statnett SF receives a Daniel Annas 100% efficiency score; this leads us to expect the company will capture in full the revenue cap Stockholm of its cost base. +46 (8) 4405925 daniel.annas - We expect continued ample rating headroom as our base-case scenario stipulated FFO to debt @spglobal.com to be close to 9% on average in coming years, and debt to EBITDA on average at about 8.5x, both SECONDARY CONTACT which we consider well commensurate with the 'bbb' stand-alone credit profile (SACP). Per Karlsson - We continue to view the regulatory environment for Norwegian as supportive, despite declining Stockholm weighted average cost of capital (WACC), because we view the framework as stable and (46) 8-440-5927 predictable; the WACC estimate for 2020 is 5.47%. per.karlsson @spglobal.com - We are therefore affirming our 'A+' rating and stable outlook on Statnett. ADDITIONAL CONTACT - Statnett's positive momentum in credit ratios post-2020 are hinged on RAB increasing as Industrial Ratings Europe planned, and without cost overruns. Corporate_Admin_London @spglobal.com Rating Action Rationale The regulator has announced Statnett as 100% efficient, which supports its credit ratios. On Jan. 31, the NVE announced Statnett's revenue cap, including an updated WACC estimation, at 5.47% and confirmation of a maintained 100% efficiency score. The WACC estimate decreased 35 basis points from the actual 5.82% reported in 2019, pointing to declining free-rate risk, computed as the average five-year swap rate from the most recent calendar year. -
Joint Messages Roundtable of European Energy Industrialists Brussels, 7 February 2013
w JOINT MESSAGES Roundtable of European Energy Industrialists Brussels, 7 February 2013 Empowering Market and Consumers The Roundtable of European Energy Industrialists, meeting in Brussels on 7 February 2013, represents companies that will invest more than € 75 billion by 2020. Between now and 2050, the energy industry as a whole will create millions of jobs and make a considerable contribution to economic growth. Eu- rope is now preparing its next vital steps towards a green energy transformation so comprehensive, that it overshadows all previous attempts at climate change mitigation around the world. By taking global leadership in realizing a low-carbon future, Europe's investment in infrastructure may foster a recovery from the economic downturn. Above all, the Roundtable of European Energy Industrialists believes that the future is electric, and that efficient electricity markets must be crucial in implementing this transformation. We therefore support the commitment of the European Commission to complete the internal energy market without delay. In summary, better markets, stronger grids, and smarter technologies are keys to Europe's energy transformation. – 1 – w 1. Better Markets The internal market is fundamental to efficient use of resources. In the short-term electricity market integration leads to increased liquidity and transparency in wholesale markets, more competitive prices and more freedom for consumers. In the long term, well-functioning electricity markets, stable regu- latory regimes and a robust emission-trading scheme will provide the signals for efficient investments. The reality, however, is that progress to complete the internal electricity market is slow and many ener- gy companies are having to deal with significant and rapid moves back to re-regulation of the sector at national levels. -
Methodology of Comparison 2013
METHODOLOGY OF COMPARISON 2013 Comparative Analysis of Sustainability Performance Methodological Remarks Convinced that a comparison of environmental, social and governance performance is of interest, not only to the Company itself, but also to its stakeholders, certain comparisons between Terna’s results and those of other com- panies are included in the 2013 Sustainability Report, as was the case in the preceding three years. Listed below are the main criteria adopted in the analysis, as an introduction to the reading and interpretation of the comparisons of individual indicators in the Report: • three panels of companies were identified: an industry panel, composed of the European transmission system operators and the major extra-European operators in terms of kilometres of lines managed; and two multi- industry panels, the first relative to large Italian companies (the 40 companies of the FTSE-MIB at 18 December 2013) and the second relative to the best international performers (the 24 world Sustainability Industry Group Leaders, identified by the RobecoSAM sustainability rating agency and disclosed at the publishing of the Dow Jones Sustainability Index of September 2013). The purpose of the three panels is to guarantee, also relative to the type of indicator reviewed, a comparison between companies with the same operational characteristics, an Italian comparison, and a comparison with the top international performers. The Terna figures do not contribute to the calculation of the average in the case of the RobecoSAM – Supersector Leaders panel; • the companies considered from among those in the three panels were those which publicise the information necessary for comparisons either on their websites, through the Sustainability Report (even if not prepared following the GRI guidelines) or through other documentation (HSE Report, financial report, etc.). -
Summer Outlook Report 2012 and Winter Review 2011/2012
SUMMER OUTLOOK REPORT 2012 AND WINTER REVIEW 2011/2012 European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity An Overview of System Adequacy: Summer Outlook Report 2012 and Winter Review 2011/2012 ENTSO -E Avenue Cortenbergh 100 • 1000 Brussels • Belgium • Tel +32 2 7410950 • Fax +32 2 741 0951 • [email protected] • www.entsoe.eu SUMMER OUTLOOK REPORT 2012 AND WINTER REVIEW 2011/2012 European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 3 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 4 3 METHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................... 5 3.1 SOURCE OF INFORMATION AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................... 5 3.2 AIMS AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................ 7 4 WINTER REVIEW .................................................................................................... 10 5 SUMMER OUTLOOK ............................................................................................... 11 5.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW ...................................................................................................................... 11 5.2 INDIVIDUAL COUNTRY PERSPECTIVE ANALYSIS ................................................................................. -
Future System Inertia 2
REPORT Future System Inertia 2 PARTICIPANTS Erik Ørum Energinet.dk Liisa Haarla Fingrid Mikko Kuivaniemi Fingrid Minna Laasonen Fingrid Anders Jerkø Statnett Inge Stenkløv Statnett Fredrik Wik Svenska kraftnät Katherine Elkington Svenska kraftnät Robert Eriksson Svenska kraftnät Niklas Modig Svenska kraftnät Pieter Schavemaker E-Bridge Consulting B.V. (PM) ENTSO-E AISBL • Avenue Cortenbergh 100 • 1000 Brussels • Belgium • Tel +32 2 741 09 50 • Fax +32 2 741 09 51 • [email protected] • www.entsoe.eu European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity Contents FUTURE SYSTEM INERTIA 2 ........................................................................................................1 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..........................................................................................................7 1.1 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE ................................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................ 7 1.3 NEXT STEPS ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 2. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 11 2.1 SCOPE FOR THE PROJECT .................................................................................................................................. -
Nordlink Benefits of the Nordlink Interconnector
NordLink Benefits of the NordLink interconnector The exchange of power enabled by NordLink will increase security of supply for the German and Norwegian grid and will allow exchange of renewable energies, especially hydroelectric power and wind power, between both countries. In addition it will give more stable electricity prices on both sides and, further on, also will facilitate Eur opean market integration. Driver of the energy transition / Integration of renewables NordLink is a cornerstone in the accomplishment of the energy transition. Since incorporation of the project in the federal national plan law (Bundesbedarfsplangesetz), the energy market necessity and urgent requirement for implementation of the project has been made statutory. The status “Project of Common Interest (PCI)” awarded by the European Union in accordance with the new guidelines for trans-European energy infrastructure underlines the high importance regarding socio-economic and energy market aspects of the project at a European level. NordLink – the “green cable” – will help to facilitate the integration of more renewable energy in Norway and in Germany. It will thus help to reduce CO2 emissions and reach climate goals. With its capacity of 1.400 megawatts, the interconnector can provide renewable energy for more than 3.6 million German households and will be able to export for example wind generated by approximately 466 wind turbines of 3 megawatts. This is comparable to the capacity of a large conventional power plant. European market integration NordLink is the first interconnector that directly connects Norwegian and German energy markets. This supports the integration of the Northwest European energy market, improves market efficiency and stabilises power prices. -
Minutes SDAC Joint Steering Committee Meeting 04/06/2020,13:30 – 17:00 CET, Conference Call
Minutes SDAC Joint Steering Committee Meeting 04/06/2020,13:30 – 17:00 CET, conference call Present parties 50Hertz Cropex EPEX Spot Litgrid PSE Terna Admie EirGrid (TSO) ESO MAVIR REE TGE Amprion Eirgrid (SEMO PX) EXAA Nasdaq REN Transelectrica APG ElecLink Fingrid Nemo Link RTE Transnet BW AST Elering GME NGIC SEPS TTG BritNed ELES HEnEx OKTE SONI (SEMO PX) TTN BSP Elia HOPS OMIE SONI (TSO) ČEPS EMCO Nord Pool HUPX OPCOM Statnett Creos Energinet IBEX OTE Svk Attending by phone Not present Present chairs, TF leaders, PMOs, observers BMTF leader/PMO Entso-e MRC OPSCOM leader MSD TSO co-leader OST Swissgrid EC JSC Secretary MRC OPSCOM PMO MSD PMO PCR chair & PMO TSO co-chair EMS MEPSO MSD NEMO co-leader NEMO co-chair Procedures TF leader Attending by phone Not present Meeting agenda # Topic For 1 Welcome, practicalities 1.1 Confirm quorum Inf 1.2 Adoption of the agenda Dec 1.3 Approval of minutes of past meetings/calls (incl. part for publication) Dec 1.4 Review open action points Inf 2 Strategy/governance – decisions required 2.1 Way forward Central Settlement Entity Inf 3 Important points to highlight and decisions requested by TFs 3.1 Status extension projects and communication towards EC Dec 3.2 MRC OPSCOM Dec 3.3 MSD Dec 3.4 Procedures TF Inf 3.5 BMTF Dec 3.6 JSC members questions to reports in back-up section Dis 4 Important points for SDAC from ENTSO-E/ NC/ NRAs/ ACER/ EC 4.1 Preparations for next TCG and MESC Inf 4.2 EC consultation on first light amendment of some relevant regulations incl. -
Minutes SDAC Joint Steering Committee Meeting 28/10/2020,11:00 – 17:00 CET, Conference Call
Minutes SDAC Joint Steering Committee Meeting 28/10/2020,11:00 – 17:00 CET, conference call Present parties 50Hertz Cropex EPEX Spot Litgrid PSE Terna Admie EirGrid (TSO) ESO MAVIR REE TGE Amprion Eirgrid (SEMO PX) EXAA Nasdaq REN Transelectrica APG ElecLink Fingrid Nemo Link RTE Transnet BW AST Elering GME NGIC/NGIFA2 SEPS TTG BritNed ELES HEnEx OKTE SONI (SEMO PX) TTN BSP Elia HOPS OMIE SONI (TSO) ČEPS EMCO Nord Pool HUPX OPCOM Statnett Creos Energinet IBEX OTE Svk Attending by phone Not present Present chairs, TF leaders, PMOs, observers BMTF leader/PMO Entso-e MRC OPSCOM leader MSD TSO co-leader OST Swissgrid EC JSC Secretary MRC OPSCOM PMO MSD PMO PCR chair & PMO TSO co-chair EMS MEPSO MSD NEMO co-leader NEMO co-chair Procedures TF leader Attending by phone Not present Meeting agenda # Topic For 1 Welcome, practicalities 1.1 Confirm quorum Inf 1.2 Adoption of the agenda Dec 1.3 Approval of minutes of past meetings/calls (incl. part for publication) Dec 1.4 Review open action points Inf 2 Strategy/governance 2.1 Exit plan for GB parties Dec 2.2 DAOA: clarification re. approval of updated operational procedures Dec 2.3 15 min MTU implementation project Dec 2.4 Assessment on synergies between regions and SDAC Inf 3 Important points to highlight and decisions requested by TFs 3.1 BMTF Dec 3.2 MRC OPSCOM – PART 1 Dec Lunch break 3.3 Confirm quorum Inf 3.4 MRC OPSCOM – PART 2 Inf 3.5 Interim Coupling Project Inf 3.6 MSD (20 min) Inf 3.7 Intraday auctions (IDA) Inf 3.8 CCP default – status reporting Inf 3.9 JSC members questions to reports in back-up section Dis 4 Important points for SDAC from ENTSO-E/ NC/ NRAs/ ACER/ EC 4.1 Joint SDAC & SIDC governance: “lean” implementation proposal Dis 4.2 Feedback from 22/09 TCG and 23/09 MESC Inf 5 Any other business 5.1 SDAC communication plan Inf 5.2 Qualified electronic signature – status investigation outcome Inf 5.3 Next meetings Inf 1 List of decisions # Topic Decision 1.2 Adoption of the The meeting agenda is approved. -
Afrr-Platform Accession Roadmap Version Description Date V1 Initial Version 24/4/2020
^Mhertz vdPC* ^mpr,on CepT EELES elia ENERGINET ^ESO hops pse FINGRID M AAMHE MAVIR " »^orriPAs* > REN Q '**5* - Statnett Så» swissgrid T5TenneT HTerna ^ tr"nsnetbw aFRR-Platform Accession roadmap Version Description Date V1 Initial version 24/4/2020 According to Implementation Framework for a European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with automatic activation (aFRRIF), Artide 5, Paragraph 4 (b) member TSOs shall develop accession roadmap withinthree months after approval of aFRRIF (date of approval 24/1/2020). The accession of member TSOs to aFRR-Platform (PICASSO) is planned in accordance with the following accession roadmap. PICASSO member TSOs and ENTSO-E Share this accession roadmap for informative purposes only and does not, in any case, representa firm, binding ordefinitive position of PICASSO on the content. The content is subject to change as the implementation progresses and new information becomes available. This accession roadmap will be updated at least twice a year to give stakeholders current information on the development. Explanatory notes Member TSOs below include an explanation for all aspects in the accession roadmap according to the aFRRIF: 5.4.(b)(i) the adaptation and implementation of terms and conditions for BSPs by each memberTSO Member TSOs deemed relevant to split the development of T&C and their entry into force to provide clarity to stakeholders. Entry into force of T&C in some TSOs does not have to be adherent to the connection and Go-live of such TSOs in aFRR-Platform. In practice, the updated T&C may be applied in advance. -
Decision Norned 101783 2
Public Version – this is a non-certified translation (leading is the original decision in Dutch, Netherlands Government Gazette of 23 December 2004, No. 248, page 17) Office of Energy Regulation DECISION Number: 101783_2-76 Subject: Decision on the application by TenneT for permission to finance the NorNed cable in accordance with section 31 (6) of the Electricity Act of 1998 This decision consists of the following parts: I. TenneT’s application 1 II. Public preparation 2 III. Consultation with TenneT and the Norwegian authorities 3 IV. Legal context 4 V. Utility of interconnector capacity 4 VI. Opinions received 6 VII. Assessment grounds 9 VIII. Socio-economic assessment of the application 9 IX. Market coupling 17 X. Incentives for TenneT 18 XI. Decision 21 Annex A: Conditions Annex B: Accounting Rules 1. On 31 August 2004, the Director of the Office of Energy Regulation (hereinafter "the Director of DTe") received a written application from TenneT B.V., the manager of the national high- voltage grid (hereinafter "TenneT"). In the application, TenneT requests permission to finance a high-voltage cable between the Netherlands and Norway (hereinafter "the cable") using the revenues, as referred to in section 31 (6) of the Electricity Act 1998 (hereinafter "the Electricity Act"). 2. TenneT and the Norwegian grid manager, Statnett SF (hereinafter "Statnett") intend to construct a high-voltage cable between the Netherlands and Norway (also referred to as the ‘NorNed cable’ or the ‘NorNed project’) and, by doing so, to create a direct connection between both high-voltage grids. According to the application, the cable has a length of 1 Public Version – this is a non-certified translation (leading is the original decision in Dutch, Netherlands Government Gazette of 23 December 2004, No.