DOCSLIB.ORG

Sovereignty, Liberalism and the Intelligibility of Attraction to Subsidiarity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sovereignty, Liberalism and the Intelligibility of Attraction to Subsidiarity The American Journal of Jurisprudence, Vol. 61, No. 1 (2016), pp. 109–132 doi:10.1093/ajj/auw003 Advance Access published 11 May 2016 Sovereignty, Liberalism and the Intelligibility of Attraction to Subsidiarity Maria Cahill* Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajj/article/61/1/109/1739878 by guest on 27 September 2021 Abstract: Although our attraction to subsidiarity may often be little more than skin deep, this article proposes that there is a hidden intelligibility to the phenomenon of its gaining increasing attention and prestige. That intelligibility can be discerned through a consideration of the archetype of authority that subsidiarity proposes: embedded authority, which acknowledges the existence of and mandates engagement with groups as groups. This archetype of embedded authority originally acted as a counterweight to the model of disembedded authority proposed by early theories of sovereignty, and in a similar way, subsidiarity’s consistent proposal of embedded authority currently operates as a counterweight to liberalism, with its individualistic emphasis. Against the backdrop of these diverging archetypes of authority, it becomes clearer that subsidiarity cannot be reduced to the status of a charming trinket to embellish liberalism’s public sphere. In fact, coming from an “alien” tradition, subsidiarity offers deep solutions to problems that liberalism itself cannot address. Keywords: Subsidiarity, Liberalism, Sovereignty, Theories of Authority What is it that draws us to subsidiarity? Whatever it is, whether a rule, principle, guideline or language,1 it currently enjoys considerable interest and growing * Lecturer in Law, University College Cork. Email: [email protected] 1 See, e.g., Paul Marquardt, “Subsidiarity and Sovereignty in the European Union,” Fordham International Law Journal 18 (1994): 628; Theodor Schilling, “Subsidiarity as a Rule and a Principle, or: Taking Subsidiarity Seriously,” Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper 10/95 (1995) (considering subsidiarity as a rule); Nicholas Barber, “The Limited Modesty of Subsidiarity,” European Law Journal 11 (2005): 308; Gra´inne de Bu´rca, “The Principle of Subsidiarity and the Court of Justice as an Institutional Actor,” Journal of Common Market Studies 36 (1998): 217-35; Thomas Horsley, “Subsidiarity and the European Court of Justice: Missing Pieces in the Subsidiarity Jigsaw,” Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (2012): 269; Aurdlian Portuese, “The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Principle of Economic Efficiency,” Columbia Journal of European Law 17 (2011): 234; A. G. Toth, “The Principle of Subsidiarity in the Maastricht Treaty,” Common Market Law Review 29 (1992): 1104 (considering subsidiarity as a principle); Christoph Henkel, “The Allocation of Powers in the European Union: A Closer Look at the Principle of Subsidiarity,” Berkeley Journal of International Law 20 (2002): 366 (considering subsidiarity as a guideline), and Gra´inne de Bu´rca, “Re-appraising Subsidiarity’s Significance after Amsterdam,” Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper 7/99 (1999) (discussing subsidiarity as a language). ß The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of University of Notre Dame. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected]. 110 M. Cahill prestige.2 Perhaps there is no rational basis for this. In Europe, for example, nearly sixty years of constitutional unsettlement have inevitably prompted us to excavate for venerable ideas to bring to light and dust off for re-use; perhaps subsidiarity is just one of a myriad of old things that we have turned to in desperation, but without any real interest in it for its own sake. Still, this article contends that there is intelligibility to our attraction to subsidiarity, whether or not that intelligibility finds resonance in the reality of our conscious sociological response thereto. Just as subsidiarity itself can and should be theorized in order to prevent it degenerating into a dogmatic and unintelligible preference for lower over higher levels,3 so too Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajj/article/61/1/109/1739878 by guest on 27 September 2021 our interest in subsidiarity can be theoretically probed to explore how it acts as a counter weight to one of the prevailing assumptions of our contemporary political philosophy. I do not mean simply that subsidiarity constitutes a backlash against centralization, although it is true, in a sense, that it does,4 and although this may very well be one of the reasons for its growing popularity.5 I mean that subsidiarity offers us a way of governing that can acknowledge the existence of and engage with groups as groups, thereby providing a counterbalance to the individualism which does not easily acknowledge the existence of groups as such, preferring to 2 Subsidiarity’s place in the European Union is well-established in the Preamble and Article 5 of the Treaty on the European Union as well as the Protocol on the Application of the Principles of Subsidiarity and Proportionality. It has recently been introduced into the Preamble of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms by means of Protocol 15. The United Nations Development Programme, 1999 Working Paper on Decentralisation, acknowledges subsidiarity in the context of decentralization. For evidence of aca- demic work discerning increasing support for subsidiarity outside of the European context, see ‘Subsidiarity in Global Governance’ Conference organized by Markus Jachtenfuchs and Nico Krisch at Hertie School of Governance on 19-20th June 2014; Global Perspectives on Subsidiarity, ed. Michelle Evans and Augusto Zimmermann (New York, Springer, 2014); Federalism and Subsidiarity, ed. James E. Fleming and Jacob T. Levy (NOMOS vol. 55) (New York, New York University Press, 2014); Steven Calabresi and Lucy Bickford, “Federalism and Subsidarity: Perspectives from US Constitutional Law,” Northwestern University Faculty Working Papers Paper 215 (2011); Alex Mills, “Federalism in the European Union and the United States: Subsidiarity, Private Law and the Conflict of Laws,” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 32 (2010): 369; Andreas Paulus, “Subsidiarity, Fragmentation and Democracy: Towards the Demise of General International Law?,” in The Shifting Allocation of Authority in International Law: Considering Sovereignty, Supremacy and Subsidiarity, ed. Tomer Broude and Yuval Shany, (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008), 193, Robert Vischer, “Subsidiarity as a Principle of Governance: Beyond Devolution,” Indiana Law Review 35 (2001): 103. 3 Maria Cahill, “Theorising Subsidiarity: Towards an Ontology-Sensitive Approach,” International Journal of Constitutional Law (forthcoming). 4 Subsidiarity may well have decentralizing effects but its purpose to afford due recognition to the natural authority of existing groups, and not decentralization for its own sake. Moreover, subsidiarity supposes that the state is the authority of last resort, acting in a subsidiary capacity to those groups. Decentralization and devolution, insofar as they assume that the state can bestow its authority on smaller units of organization and act through them, are in fact the opposite of subsidiarity! See, e.g., Russell Hittinger, “The Coherence of the Four Basic Principles of Catholic Social Doctrine: An Interpretation,” in Pursuing the Common Good: How Solidarity and Subsidiarity Can Work Together, ed. Margaret S. Archer and Paolo Donati, Pontifical Academy of the Social Sciences, Acta, vol. 14 (Vatican City: Pontifical Academy of the Social Sciences, 2008), 95-105, and. Vischer, “Subsidiarity as a Principle of Governance,” 103-107. 5 See, e.g., “From Subsidiarity to Success: The Impact of Decentralisation on Economic Growth,” Study Commissioned by the Assembly of European Regions, May 2009. Sovereignty, Liberalism and the Intelligibility of Attraction to Subsidiarity 111 deal directly with individuals.6 The suggestion is that, attraction to subsidiarity makes sense for its capacity to balance out the dominance of individualism,7 and therefore that, in a climate of political liberalism, it is to be anticipated that subsidiarity’s star should rise. Its origins date back to ancient Greece and Rome, such that when the word “subsidiarity” was coined in the twentieth century it self-consciously describes a historical reality that precedes the neologism by thousands of years.8 Its emergence in Catholic Social Thought was deeply contextualized amidst concerns for the conditions of workers, the primacy of the family, and specific and important func- Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ajj/article/61/1/109/1739878 by guest on 27 September 2021 tions that other naturally-occurring groups contribute to the common good, but taken as a whole, it constituted a response to any politico-philosophical ideology (not just socialism) which endorsed the idea of an all-powerful state. Essentially, it positioned itself against the early theories of sovereignty. Specifically, subsidiarity challenged the idea that authority could be disembedded in the way that the original theories of sovereignty had proposed. The archetype of disembedded authority will be depicted in detail; for now, suffice it to say that disembedded authority is au- thority that is, in principle, detached from the society over which it rules. That is not to accuse the holders of authority of being aloof or particularly ill adept at public relations, but to argue that the archetype of authority proposed features character- istics
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Political Ideas and Movements That Created the Modern World
    harri+b.cov 27/5/03 4:15 pm Page 1 UNDERSTANDINGPOLITICS Understanding RITTEN with the A2 component of the GCE WGovernment and Politics A level in mind, this book is a comprehensive introduction to the political ideas and movements that created the modern world. Underpinned by the work of major thinkers such as Hobbes, Locke, Marx, Mill, Weber and others, the first half of the book looks at core political concepts including the British and European political issues state and sovereignty, the nation, democracy, representation and legitimacy, freedom, equality and rights, obligation and citizenship. The role of ideology in modern politics and society is also discussed. The second half of the book addresses established ideologies such as Conservatism, Liberalism, Socialism, Marxism and Nationalism, before moving on to more recent movements such as Environmentalism and Ecologism, Fascism, and Feminism. The subject is covered in a clear, accessible style, including Understanding a number of student-friendly features, such as chapter summaries, key points to consider, definitions and tips for further sources of information. There is a definite need for a text of this kind. It will be invaluable for students of Government and Politics on introductory courses, whether they be A level candidates or undergraduates. political ideas KEVIN HARRISON IS A LECTURER IN POLITICS AND HISTORY AT MANCHESTER COLLEGE OF ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY. HE IS ALSO AN ASSOCIATE McNAUGHTON LECTURER IN SOCIAL SCIENCES WITH THE OPEN UNIVERSITY. HE HAS WRITTEN ARTICLES ON POLITICS AND HISTORY AND IS JOINT AUTHOR, WITH TONY BOYD, OF THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION: EVOLUTION OR REVOLUTION? and TONY BOYD WAS FORMERLY HEAD OF GENERAL STUDIES AT XAVERIAN VI FORM COLLEGE, MANCHESTER, WHERE HE TAUGHT POLITICS AND HISTORY.
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H
    Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I Hannes H. Gissurarson Twenty-Four Conservative-Liberal Thinkers Part I New Direction MMXX CONTENTS Hannes H. Gissurarson is Professor of Politics at the University of Iceland and Director of Research at RNH, the Icelandic Research Centre for Innovation and Economic Growth. The author of several books in Icelandic, English and Swedish, he has been on the governing boards of the Central Bank of Iceland and the Mont Pelerin Society and a Visiting Scholar at Stanford, UCLA, LUISS, George Mason and other universities. He holds a D.Phil. in Politics from Oxford University and a B.A. and an M.A. in History and Philosophy from the University of Iceland. Introduction 7 Snorri Sturluson (1179–1241) 13 St. Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) 35 John Locke (1632–1704) 57 David Hume (1711–1776) 83 Adam Smith (1723–1790) 103 Edmund Burke (1729–1797) 129 Founded by Margaret Thatcher in 2009 as the intellectual Anders Chydenius (1729–1803) 163 hub of European Conservatism, New Direction has established academic networks across Europe and research Benjamin Constant (1767–1830) 185 partnerships throughout the world. Frédéric Bastiat (1801–1850) 215 Alexis de Tocqueville (1805–1859) 243 Herbert Spencer (1820–1903) 281 New Direction is registered in Belgium as a not-for-profit organisation and is partly funded by the European Parliament. Registered Office: Rue du Trône, 4, 1000 Brussels, Belgium President: Tomasz Poręba MEP Executive Director: Witold de Chevilly Lord Acton (1834–1902) 313 The European Parliament and New Direction assume no responsibility for the opinions expressed in this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Liberalism and Realism: A
    International Journal of Business and Management Review Vol.1, No.4, pp.15-25, December 2013 Published by European Centre for Research Training and Development UK (www.ea-journals.org) LIBERALISM AND REALISM: A MATRIX FOR POLITICAL ECONOMY IKE NNIA MBA SR, PHD Department of Management, University Of Nigeria, Enugu Campus EZE UKAMAKA TERESA Inspector of Education, Ministry Of Education, Enugu State ABSTRACT: Politics and economics share an intimate relationship. To separate either in analysis is unfair, as it dismisses the interdependency between both schools of thought. Thus, in issues pertaining to the Political Economy, there is a fusion between politics and economics to obtain the most thorough and holistic understanding of both spheres. Political economy is concerned with the allocation of scarce resources in a world of infinite wants and needs. In order to allocate these resources, politics are used within a state to provide for the people. Of the different analytic frameworks there are two dominant perspectives: Liberalism and Realism. Liberalism can be attributed to a political doctrine that takes protecting and enhancing the freedom of the individual and their economic activities to be paramount in nation-states, while Realism is based on certain assumptions or premises that nation-states are the dominant actors within the political economy and the proper units of analysis. Other units of analysis are subordinated to the nation-state and therefore superfluous to integrate into evaluation. This paper is directed towards liberalism and realism paradigm; a matrix very useful in comprehending the behavior of the nation-state and in describing, explaining, and predicting political economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Law Or Liberalism? Gay Rights in the New Eastern Europe
    NATURAL LAW OR LIBERALISM? GAY RIGHTS IN THE NEW EASTERN EUROPE by Alexander Dmitrenko A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws Graduate Department of Faculty of Law University of Toronto O Copyright by Alexander Dmitrenko 2001 National Library Bibliothèque nationale du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 WeUington Street 395, rue Wellington OttawaON KiAON4 OttawaON KlAW Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence dowing the exclusive permettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or sell reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis in microform, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats. la forme de microfiche/film, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique. The author regains ownership of die L'auteur conserve la propriété du copyright in this thesis. Neither the droit d' auteur qui protège cette thèse. thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels may be printed or othemise de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés reproduced without the author's ou autrement reproduits sans son pemiission. autorisation. ABSTRACT Natural Law or Liberrillsm? Gay Rights in the New Eastern Europe Alexander Dmitrenko Master of Laws Degree Faculty of Law University of Toronto 200 1 This paper endeavours to chart a course for the advancement of gay and lesbian rights in the newly formed democracies of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). At the current time, most if not al1 CEE countries have decriminalized sodomy.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Peace and the Formation of Political Order Oliver P. Richmond1 Abstract Contrary to Most Debates About State Formation This A
    1 Peace and the Formation of Political Order Oliver P. Richmond1 Abstract Contrary to most debates about state formation this article outlines an alternative perspective on the shaping of political community- and the international- based upon the agency of actors engaged in peaceful forms of politics after war. Drawing on long standing critical debates it investigates the positive potential of ‘peace formation’, outlining the theoretical development of this new concept as a parallel process and often in opposition to modern state formation with which it is often bound up in. It also examines the limits of peace formation and its engagement with old and new types of power and conflict. This perspective on the formation of political order has implications for the international peace architecture and its evolution, including in terms of a shift from analogue to digital forms of peace. “Context trumps everything”2 “…Foucault created the twentieth century’s most devastating critique of the free subject- and then… liquidated it…. Power was distributed, dynamic and nodal… Foucault’s model of the 1 This article draws- and advances upon- on my book, Peace formation and political order in conflict-affected societies, OUP, 2016. Thanks to several reviewers for their very helpful comments. Oliver Richmond is a Research Professor in IR, Peace and Conflict Studies at Department of Politics, at the University of Manchester, UK. He is also International Professor, College of International Studies, Kyung Hee University, Korea and a Visiting Professor at the University of Tromso. His recent publications include Peace Formation and Political Order (Oxford University Press, 2016), Failed Statebuilding (Yale University Press, 2014) and A Very Short Introduction to Peace (Oxford University Press, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Liberal Democracy*
    THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LIBERAL DEMOCRACY* Sharun Mukand Dani Rodrik Department of Economics John F. Kennedy School of Government University of Warwick Harvard University Coventry CV4 7AL Cambridge, MA 02138 United Kingdom U.S.A. Revised January 2016 * The first draft of this paper was written at the Institute for Advanced Study, to which we are grateful for support. We also thank members of the IAS School of Social Science lunch table for useful discussions, as well as Carles Boix, William Ferguson, Sumon Majumdar, Jan-Werner Müller, Ira Katznelson, and commentators at presentations at Northwestern, London School of Economics, the NBER, Brown, and WINIR-Rio for helpful suggestions. -2- THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LIBERAL DEMOCRACY ABSTRACT We distinguish between three sets of rights – property rights, political rights, and civil rights – and provide a taxonomy of political regimes. The distinctive nature of liberal democracy is that it protects civil rights (equality before the law for minorities) in addition to the other two. When democratic transitions are the product of a settlement between the elite (who care mostly about property rights) and the majority (who care mostly about political rights), they generically fail to produce liberal democracy. This is because the minority has neither the resources nor the numbers to make a contribution to the settlement. We develop a formal model to sharpen the contrast between electoral and liberal democracies and highlight circumstances under which liberal democracy can emerge. We discuss informally the difference between social mobilizations sparked by industrialization and decolonization. Since the latter revolve around identity cleavages rather than class cleavages, they are less conducive to liberal politics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prospects for Peace Education in Cyprus: Exploring the Potential for Future Unified Education Through the Examination of a Bi-Communal School
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository THE PROSPECTS FOR PEACE EDUCATION IN CYPRUS: EXPLORING THE POTENTIAL FOR FUTURE UNIFIED EDUCATION THROUGH THE EXAMINATION OF A BI-COMMUNAL SCHOOL Marios Antoniou A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Education in the School of Education. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Lynda Stone Rebecca Bryant Madeleine Grumet George Noblit James Peacock ABSTRACT Marios Antoniou: The Prospects for Peace Education in Cyprus: Exploring the Potential for Future Unified Education through the Examination of a Bi-Communal School. (Under the direction of Dr. Lynda Stone) This dissertation is the product of the investigation of an educational institution in Cyprus, where supposed enemies share a classroom and a unifying school identity. In 2003, following the opening of a few checkpoints along the dividing line of the island that keeps apart Greek Cypriots in the south and Turkish Cypriots in the north since 1974, “The English School”, a prestigious public-private school in the south welcomed the enrollment of Turkish Cypriot students, thus becoming the island’s first and only bi-communal public-private secondary school. Schooling has historically been utilized as a tool for constructing unifying national identities. The British colonial exit strategy left Cyprus in confusion between the ethnos and the nation. Cypriots are trapped in an intractable conflict that is rooted in nationalism and education systems contribute to the perpetuation of the conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism Supplementary
    The European Trust Crisis and the Rise of Populism Supplementary Online Appendix Yann Algan Sergei Guriev Sciences Po and CEPR EBRD, Sciences Po and CEPR Elias Papaioannou Evgenia Passari London Business School and CEPR Université Paris-Dauphine Abstract This supplementary online appendix consists of three parts. First, we provide summary statistics, additional sensitivity checks and further evidence. Second, we provide details and sources on the data covering regional output and unemployment, trust, beliefs, attitudes and voting statistics. Third, we provide the classification of non-mainstream political parties’ political orientation (far-right, radical-left, populist, Eurosceptic and separatist) for all countries. 1 1. Summary Statistics, Additional Sensitivity Checks, and Further Evidence 1.1 Summary Statistics Appendix Table 1 reports the summary statistics at the individual level for all variables that we use from the ESS distinguishing between the pre-crisis period (2000-08) and the post-crisis period (2009-14). Panel A looks at all questions on general trust, trust in national and supranational institutions, party identification, ideological position on the left-right scale and beliefs on the European unification issue whereas in panel B we focus on attitudes to immigration. 1.2 Additional Sensitivity Checks Appendix Table 2 looks at the relationship between employment rates and voting for anti- establishment parties. Panel A reports panel OLS estimates with region fixed effects. Panel B reports difference-in-differences estimates. In contrast to Table 4, the specifications now include a dummy that takes on the value of one for core countries (Austria, France, Norway, Sweden) and zero for the periphery countries (Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Greece, Spain, Hungary, Ireland, Slovakia).
    [Show full text]
  • The Neoliberal Era: Ideology, Policy, and Social Effects
    1 Evans Sewell Neoliberalism DRAFT Re-revised 5-17-11 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE WITHOUT AUTHORS’ PERMISSION THE NEOLIBERAL ERA: IDEOLOGY, POLICY, AND SOCIAL EFFECTS Peter Evans and William H. Sewell, Jr. Prepared for Social Resilience in the Neo-Liberal Era edited by Peter Hall and Michele Lamont Forthcoming, 2013. Cambridge University Press. In the final three decades of the twentieth century, the world’s political economic framework underwent a far-reaching transformation from a state-centric to a neoliberal form (Sewell 2005). In the years following World War II, economies in all areas of the world had been governed by state-centered regulatory regimes. In the wealthy countries of North America, Western Europe, Japan, and the Antipodes, economies were based on free markets and private property, but they were carefully steered and regulated by democratic Keynesian welfare states. In the communist countries, almost all economic activity took place in authoritarian state institutions. And in most of the major countries of Africa, Asia, and Latin America, governments imposed ambitious schemes of state-led development. Over the course of the 1970s, state-led regulatory regimes entered into crisis. By the 1990s, the communist regimes had fallen or had been thoroughly transformed from within by introducing markets and privatizing production. The advanced capitalist 2 Evans Sewell Neoliberalism DRAFT Re-revised 5-17-11 countries had dismantled or watered down their regulatory states – by privatizing publicly owned enterprises, lifting capital controls, deregulating markets, and, more selectively, paring back welfare guarantees. And the vast majority of developing countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America had abandoned important elements of their nationalist development strategies and opened their borders to global flows of capital and goods – some on their own volition and others under the coercive urging of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism and World Politics Author(S): Michael W
    Liberalism and World Politics Author(s): Michael W. Doyle Source: The American Political Science Review, Vol. 80, No. 4 (Dec., 1986), pp. 1151-1169 Published by: American Political Science Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1960861 . Accessed: 15/10/2011 20:37 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Political Science Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The American Political Science Review. http://www.jstor.org LIBERALISMAND WORLDPOLITICS MICHAEL W. DOYLE Johns Hopkins University Building on a growing literaturein internationalpolitical science, I reexamine the traditional liberal claim that governments founded on a respect for individualliberty exercise "restraint" and "peacefulintentions" in theirforeign policy. I look at three distinct theoreticaltraditions of liberalism,attributable to three theorists: Schumpeter,a democratic capitalist whose explanation of liberal pacifism we often invoke; Machiavelli, a classical republicanwhose glory is an imperialismwe often practice;and Kant, a liberalrepublican whose theory of internationalismbest accounts for what we are. Despite the contradictionsof liberalpacifism and liberalimperialism, I find, with Kant and other democraticrepublicans, that liberalismdoes leave a coherent legacy on foreign affairs.Liberal states are different.They are indeedpeaceful.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Vaas to Explore the Dimensionality of the Policy Space: Experiments from Brazil, Peru, Scotland and Cyprus
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 Using VAAs to explore the dimensionality of the policy space: experiments from Brazil, Peru, Scotland and Cyprus Wheatley, Jonathan DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2012.051304 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-95094 Journal Article Originally published at: Wheatley, Jonathan (2012). Using VAAs to explore the dimensionality of the policy space: experiments from Brazil, Peru, Scotland and Cyprus. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5(3/4):318-348. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2012.051304 318 Int. J. Electronic Governance Vol. 5, Nos. 3/4, 2012 Using VAAs to explore the dimensionality of the policy space: experiments from Brazil, Peru, Scotland and Cyprus Jonathan Wheatley Centre for Research on Direct Democracy (c2d), University of Zurich, Aarau, Switzerland Email: [email protected] Abstract: Research into Voting Advice Applications (VAA) has hitherto been concerned with technical issues over the use of VAAs as a tool to help people vote. This paper shows that data generated by VAAs can also be used for research into how policy preferences of voters can be conceptualised in terms of a multi-dimensional policy space. Specifically, analysis of data extracted from VAAs deployed in Brazil, Peru, Scotland and Cyprus reaffirm the importance of existing concepts of Left and Right, as well as a second dimension of social conservatism versus social liberalism (sometimes known as GAL-TAN), as defining features of the policy space.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy and Deterrence Foundations for an Enduring World Peace
    Democracy and Deterrence Foundations for an Enduring World Peace DR. WALTER GARY SHARP SR. Air University Press Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama May 2008 Muir S. Fairchild Research Information Center Cataloging Data Sharp, Walter Gary. Democracy and deterrence : foundations for an enduring world peace / Walter Gary Sharp, Sr. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-58566-180-0 1. Deterrence (Strategy) 2. Democracy. 3. War—Prevention. I. Title. 327.172—dc22 Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of Air University, the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or any other US government agency. Cleared for public release: distribution unlimited. Air University Press 131 West Shumacher Avenue Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-5962 http://aupress.maxwell.af.mil ii Dedicated to my loving wife Anne Marie Sharp from whom all good in my life flows Contents Chapter Page DISCLAIMER . ii DEDICATION . iii FOREWORD . ix ABOUT THE AUTHOR . xi PREFACE . xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . xv 1 LIBERAL DEMOCRACY AND ITS GLOBAL INFLUENCE . 1 Features of a Liberal Democracy . 2 Global Political Trends . 7 Notes . 17 2 CONVENTIONAL THEORIES OF WAR AND WAR AVOIDANCE . 19 Conventional Thinking on the Cause of War . 21 Conventional Approaches to War Avoidance . 24 Deterrence as a Tool of War Avoidance . 31 The Law of Conflict Management . 35 The Future of Armed Conflict . 38 Notes . 40 3 THE DEMOCRATIC PEACE PRINCIPLE . 45 The Early Debate . 45 Contemporary Studies and Methodologies . 49 Explanations for the Democratic Peace Principle . 63 Challenges and Alternate Rationales .
    [Show full text]